state’s rights and the national bank

31
State’s Rights and the National Bank Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism Part 6

Upload: elda

Post on 22-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

State’s Rights and the National Bank. Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism Part 6. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: State’s Rights and the National Bank

State’s Rights and the National Bank

Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism Part 6

Page 2: State’s Rights and the National Bank

When the War of 1812 ended, British manufacturers wanted to destroy their American competitors by flooding the U.S. market with inexpensive goods. In response, Congress in 1816 passed a tariff to protect the infant American industries. The tariff was increased in 1824 and again in 1828. Jackson’s vice president was John C. Calhoun of South Carolina. The two men opposed each other over the Tariff.

Page 3: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• This was a tax that increased the price of foreign-made goods. By 1828, the tariff had been raised twice.

Page 4: State’s Rights and the National Bank

Although Calhoun supported the tariff at first, he came to oppose it. He called the Tariff of 1828 a Tariff of Abominations, because he believed that it hurt the South.

Page 5: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Southerners had little industry of their own. They believed that they were paying more for goods in order to support industry in the North.

Page 6: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Calhoun believed the South had the right to disobey the tariff based on the principle of nullification. This principle held that states could nullify federal laws that they felt were unconstitutional.

Page 7: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Calhoun went even further. He believed that if the government forbid a state from nullifying a federal law, that state had the right to leave the union.

Page 8: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• In 1830, the Senate debated the tariff – as well as the issue of nullification. Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts opposed states; efforts to nullify a federal law.

Page 9: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Senator Robert Hayne of South Carolina defended nullification.

Page 10: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• In 1832, Congress passed a new tariff.• The issue of nullification erupted again.

Page 11: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• South Carolina declared the new tariff invalid.• The state threatened to secede, or leave the Union.

Page 12: State’s Rights and the National Bank

This made President Jackson furious. He threatened to send federal troops to collect the tariff revenues.

Page 13: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Henry Clay worked out a compromise that kept South Carolina in the union.

Page 14: State’s Rights and the National Bank

Jackson Attacks the National Bank

Page 15: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• South Carolina’s action wasn’t the only thing that stirred Andrew Jackson’s anger. The President also took on the second national bank, the Bank of the United States (BUS) in Philadelphia.

Page 16: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Jackson viewed the bank as an agent of the wealthy and elite – a group he deeply distrusted.

Page 17: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Jackson tried to shut the bank down by taking money out of it and putting it in other banks. In an attempt to save the bank, the bank’s president called for all loans to be repaid.

Page 18: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• This caused many businesses to go bankrupt. As a result, the bank lost much support. In 1836 the national bank went out of business.

Page 20: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• In 1835, Jackson’s bank war nearly cost him his life. Richard Lawrence, who thought that he was King Richard III of England, believed the United States owed him a large sum of money. He felt Jackson’s actions against the bank were preventing him from receiving him the money he was owed.

Page 21: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Lawrence thought that if he killed Jackson, Martin van Buren (Jackson’s Vice President) would allow for the bank to be reestablished, enabling him to get his money back. Unfortunately for Lawrence, his gun did not fire. He pulled out a second pistol but that one misfired. Jackson tried to beat him to death with his cane.

Page 22: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• A new political party, the Whig Party, emerged in an effort to limit the power of the presidency.

Page 23: State’s Rights and the National Bank
Page 25: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• By 1837, many of the banks Jackson had put money in during the bank fight had failed. This helped cause the Panic of 1837.

Page 27: State’s Rights and the National Bank
Page 28: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• In the 1840 presidential election, Van Buren lost to Whig candidate William Henry Harrison.

• He became the 9th president of the United States.

                                                           

Page 29: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• Harrison died from a cold which turned into pneumonia soon after taking office.

Page 30: State’s Rights and the National Bank
Page 31: State’s Rights and the National Bank

• His vice president, John Tyler, became 10th president. Tyler did not agree with many of the Whig policies. As a result, the party was unable to enact many of its programs.