State of the Network NETWORK 11

MEGAN HOUGARD, CHIEF

JANUARY 5, 2017

Network 11 Theory Of Action

Implement a standards-based curriculum;

Follow an effective data-driven instruction cycle;

Create and sustain intentional cultures of achievement; and

Provide necessary supports for students, teachers, staff, families and administrators

Students will graduate from our schools prepared for high school and college success.

IF WE…

THEN

Celebrations

High School Fair - Over 800 8th grade studentsWinter Break Basketball Tournament - 18 teamsRobotics Competition - All 4 Network 11 STEM Schools Represented, 3 teams going to State

Upcoming Events

Spelling Bee, January 24thArts Expo, February 14th and 15thSTEM Design Challenge, Tentative Date of March 10thMath Pi Day, 3.14Intramural Basketball Tournament, June

N11: Enrollment

42 Schools

• 16,128 Students• 9 High Schools* 33

Elementary Schools

• 8,200 Males • 7,928 Females• 2,675 Diverse

Learners

Data Source: CPS Dashboard 1/5/2017

*9 Total HS:

6 accountability

3 Specialty

Network 11 Demographics

● We have seen a 31.4% decline in PK-8 residents residing in the Englewood boundaries between 2008 and 2015

● On an elementary level, we are seeing higher enrollment numbers than students residing within the boundaries. Charter schools do not play a large role in the increased enrollment numbers.

● We have seen a 28% decline in 9-12 residents residing in the Englewood boundaries between 2008 and 2015

● In 2008 the 4 neighborhood High Schools made up 73% of total HS enrollment in the area. In 2015 those same 4 High Schools made up only 21% of enrollment. Charter/alternative schools made up 46% of the enrollment. Robeson has suffered the most significant student loss over this time period

What Does SQRP Measure?

N11: SY16 SQRP Elementary Schools

Good StandingProvisional SupportIntensive Support

COOK (3.4)

KIPLING (3.4)

OGLESBY (3.4)

BOND (3.3)

PARKER (2.8) FULTON (3.3) RYDER (3.9)

EARLE (2.7) TURNER-DREW (3.3) SHERWOOD (3.9)

LANGFORD (2.7) BARTON (3.2) FOSTER PARK (3.8)

HENDERSON (2.6) NICHOLSON (3.2) JOPLIN (3.7)

HOLMES (2.6) RANDOLPH (3.2) CUFFE (3.6) EVERS (4.6)

BASS (2.5) WENTWORTH (3.2) LIBBY (3.6) GREEN (4.6)

MAYS (2.5) FORT DEARBORN (3) OTOOLE (3.5) WACKER (4.5)

JACKSON M (1.9) KING ES (2.3) KERSHAW (2.7) WESTCOTT (3.5) DAVIS M (4.3)

Level 3 (Less than 2.0) Level 2 (2.0 to 2.9) Level 2+ (3.0 to 3.4) Level 1 (3.5 to 3.9) Level 1+ (4.0 or more)

SY16 1 School 10 Schools 22 Schools

SY15 3 Schools 14 Schools 16 Schools

Change - 2 Schools - 4 Schools + 6 Schools

N11: SY16 SQRP High Schools

Good StandingIntensive Support

HARPER HS (2.3)

HOPE HS (2.3)

ROBESON (1.6) TEAM HS (2.2) SIMEON (3.6) LINDBLOM (3.8)

Level 3 (Less than 2.0) Level 2 (2.0 to 2.9) Level 2+ (3.0 to 3.4) Level 1 (3.5 to 3.9) Level 1+ (4.0 or more)

1 School 3 Schools 0 Schools 1 School 1 School

Southside (2.6)*

*Southside: Good Standing despite inability rating

SY16 4 Schools 3 Schools

SY15 4 Schools 3 Schools

Change No Change No Change

SY16 NWEA Reading Attainment & Growth Percentile Comparison

The table to the right summarizes how we did as a school last year in Reading. The attainment percentile is across the horizontal axis and growth percentile is across the vertical axis.

The 28 schools above the 50th percentile line grew their students more in reading than similar schools.

Low Attainment, high growth

High Attainment, high growth

Low Attainment, low growth

High Attainment, low growth

SY16 NWEA Math Attainment & Growth Percentile Comparison

The table to the right summarizes how we did as a school last year in Math. The attainment percentile is across the horizontal axis and growth percentile is across the vertical axis.

The 19 schools above the 50th percentile line grew their students more in Math than similar schools.

Low Attainment, high growth

High Attainment, high growth

Low Attainment, low growth

High Attainment, low growth

Network 11 NWEA Student Metrics The tables below detail the % of students at grade level and the % of students who met their

annual growth targets in Reading and Math over the last three years.

Primary Literacy Growth SY16 BOY to EOY

Well Below Benchmark Below Benchmark At or Above Benchmark

SY16 EOY Totals 742 students, 32.7% 305 students, 13.4% 1224 students, 53.9%

# and % of Schools who met

or exceeded average growth

from BOY to EOY on TRC*

Grade (N) %

K 13 41.9%

1 16 51.6%

*Only 31 out of 33 schools used TRC to measure primary in K and 1st grade. 2nd grade End of Year testing is optional.

SY16 BOY to EOY TRC PerformanceThe tables below look at TRC Proficiency at each testing period: Beginning, Middle and End of

Year.

TRC Performance TRC Spanish Performance

SY17 MOY Performance: Attendance

Attendance SY15 SY16SY17 YTD

SY17 Goal

+/- goal

N11 K-8th 94.3% 95.0% 95.6% 95.9% -0.3%N11 9th - 12th 89.8% 90.1% 91.7% 91.9% -0.2%

* Q1 trends over time are difficult to measure due to the contingency strike day on 10/11. Network 11

schools had a daily attendance of 82.9% (ES) and 73.8% (HS).

Over the last three years, the Network outpaced the

District in attendance growth, increasing 1.6% points

compared to a district wide increase of 0.3% points.

On-Track and GPA

Metric SY15 SY16 SY17 Q1

On-Track 54.4% 58.4% 62.3%

% of 6th-8th Students with 3.0 annual GPA -- 24.5% 34.5%

% of 3rd, 6th, 8th graders promoted 83.7% 87.1% --

Freshman On-Track 86.9% 86.3% 85.0%

Sophomore On-Track -- 83% 88%

% of High School Students with 3.0

annual GPA

40.0% 38.2% 51.1%

The Network continues to focus on improving student grades and on-track rates. We track this data every 5 weeks

by grade level and Diverse Learner status.

Students are on-track if they earn a C or higher in both reading and math and have attendance rate of 95% or

higher.

HS On-Track and GPAThe Network continues to focus on improving student grades and on-track rates. We track this data weekly by grade level and Diverse Learner status.

Metric SY15 SY16 SY17 Q1

Freshman On-Track 86.9% 86.3% 85.0%

Sophomore On-Track -- 83% 88%

% of Students with 3.0 annual GPA 40.0% 38.2% 51.1%

Post-Secondary Metrics

Metric Class of 2014 Class of 2015 Class of 2016

Cohort Graduation Rates 65.3% 72.1% 73.0%

One Year Dropout 6.1% 3.5% 3.1%

College Enrollment 63.9% 61.0% --

College Persistence 69.9% -- --

SY16 Summer Bridge

Due to efforts during the SY16 school year, 108 less students were retained or 3.4% less of students in promotion grade levels. Schools held parent meetings and monitored students who were at risk of being retained. N11 has continued to decrease the # of students retained for two years.

# of Students Retained % of Students RetainedYear 3rd 6th 8th Total 3rd 6th 8th TotalSY14 418 307 118 843 29% 23% 8% 19.6%SY15 362 229 57 648 25% 17% 5% 16.3%SY16 293 223 24 540 19% 17% 2% 12.9%

Change -56 -78 -61 -195 -6.2% -0.4% -2.9% -3.4%

Thank You for Your Support

Network 114655 S. Dearborn, Room 309B | Chicago, Il 60609(773) 535-8230 ph | (773) 535-7598 fx

Megan J. Hougard, Chief of Schools: mjhougard@cps.edu

Cheryl D. Watkins PhD, Deputy Chief of Schools: cdwatkins@cps.edu