state of north carolina division of highways a …
TRANSCRIPT
-L- STA. 13+00.00BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4433
-L- STA. 19+25.00END TIP PROJECT B-4433
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 40 ON SR 1932
OVER DURHAM CREEK TRIBUTARY
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
V
=
=
=
440
650
60 MPH
ADT
ADT
2019
2039
FUNC CLASS =
SUB-REGIONAL TIER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO. F. A. PROJ. NO. DESCRIPTION
NO.TOTALSHEETS
N.C.SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
09/08/99
B-4433 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYSSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
11/5/2018
X:\
NC
DO
T\
B-4433\
Hy
draulics\
PE
RMIT
S_
Envir
on
me
ntal\
Dra
win
gs\b4433_rdy
_tsh.d
gn
User:b
ca
mp
CO
NT
RA
CT:
TIP P
ROJE
CT:
B-4433
AR
TM
E
N
N
A
S
O H
DE
P
TOF TRA
SPO
RT
TIO
N
TA
TE
OF N RTC
A
RO
LIN
A
VICINITY MAP
OFFSITE DETOUR
TGSENGINEERS
PROJECT LENGTH
=
=
=
PROJECT ENGINEER
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
Prepared For:
By:
RALEIGH, NC 27603
SUITE 200
706 HILLSBOROUGH ST
TGS ENGINEERS
C-0275
CORP. LICENSE NO.:
PH (919) 773-8887
4
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
V. MARCUS LOWERY, PE
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4433
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4433
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4433
See Sheet 1C-1 For Survey Control SheetSee Sheet 1B For Conventional Plan Sheet SymbolsSee Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
0.118 mile
PE
BEAUFORT COUNTY
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
SEPTEMBER 25, 2018
AUGUST 20, 2019
NCDOT DIVISION 2 CONTACT
HEATHER C. LANE, P.E.LOCAL RURAL
TTST = 6%
DU
RH
AM
CR
EE
K
TRIB
UT
AR
Y
{
{
-L- SR 1932 (MARYS CHAPEL CHURCH ROAD)
LOCATIONPROJECT
Edward
33
33
1932
1932
1950
19501949
1932
1936
1942
1947
1003
1936
306
Durha
m Creek
Tributary
Durham Creek
Durha
m Creek
RAILWAY
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
TUTEN RDTO
SR 1950
TO NC 33
-L- STA. 15+76.31BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 16+63.69END BRIDGE
R/W & UTIL
CONST.
38362.1.FD2 BRZ-1932(5)
AR
TM
E
N
N
A
S
O H
DE
P
TOF TRA
SPO
RT
TIO
N
TA
TE
OF N RTC
A
RO
LIN
A
0.017 mile
0.101 mile
RIG
HT O
F
WA
Y PLA
NS
BRZ-1932(5)
38362.3.FD1 BRZ-1932(5)
IICLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD _______.
38362.2.2
PERMIT DRAWINGS
SHEET 1 OF 8PERMIT DRAWING
NA 2011
NAD 83/
b4433_rdy_tsh.dgn 11/5/2018 3:29:30 PM TGS
Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts StreamNo. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) -L- 19+15 to 19+50 LT 1 @ 50', 1@35' CSU Bridge < 0.01
TOTALS*: < 0.01 0 0 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2016 09 09 SHEET 6 OF 8
WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARYWETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Beaufort CountyB-4433
38362.1.FD2
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
12/17/18
Permanent Wetland Impacts = < 0.01 Ac
ROAD CROSSING BRIDGE
PARALLEL IMPACT
ZONE 1 (ft2)
ZONE 2 (ft2)
TOTAL (ft2)
ZONE 1 (ft2)
ZONE 2 (ft2)
TOTAL (ft2)
ZONE 1 (ft2)
ZONE 2 (ft2)
1 @ 50', 1 @ 35' CSU Bridge -L- 15+50 to 16+00 LT X 225.0 140.0 365.0
1 @ 50', 1 @ 35' CSU Bridge -L- 15+50 to 16+00 RT X 160.0 150.0 310.0
1 @ 50', 1 @ 35' CSU Bridge -L- 16+45 to 16+95 LT X 220.0 130.0 350.0
1 @ 50', 1 @ 35' CSU Bridge -L- 16+45 to 16+95 RT X 300.0 170.0 470.0
TOTAL: 905.0 590.0 1495.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NOTES:Total Buffer Impacts = 0.04 Ac
Rev. SEP 2016 SHEET 7 OF 8
PROJECT: 38362.1.FD2B-4433
12/17/2018
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Beaufort County
IMPACT
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
TYPE
SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE / TYPESTATION
(FROM/TO)
ALLOWABLE MITIGABLEBUFFER
REPLACEMENT
ZONE 1 (ft2)
ZONE 2 (ft2)
0 0
TOTAL: 0 0
Rev. Jan 2009
WETLANDS IN BUFFERS
SITE NO.STATION
(FROM/TO)
WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
SHEET 8 OF 8
PROJECT: 38362.1.FD2B-4433
12/17/2018
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Beaufort County
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)17BP.2.R.93 TIP No.: B-4433 County(ies): Beaufort Page 1 of 1
TIP Number: Date:
Phone: Phone:Email: Email:
County(ies):CAMA County?
Yes
Design/Future: Year: 2016 Existing: Year:
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
Yes NoNo
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)Supplemental Classification:
Forest, Cropland, and Rural Residential
Durham Creek Tributary 29-21-(1)
0.3
625.00Project Description
Proposed Project
Tar-PamlicoRiver Basin(s): City/Town:
0.4Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:(Description of Minimization of Water Quality Impacts)
Yes
Address:
5/31/2018
BeaufortEdward
William (Galen) G. Cail, PE
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:TGS Engineers (Ben Henegar, PE)NCDOT Contact:
919-707-6711
Suite 200Raleigh, NC 27603
Contractor / Designer:
919-773-8887 ext. 123
706 Hillsborough Street
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1590 Mail Service Center Address:
General Project InformationSF-06004038362.1.FD2
Impairments:Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
Replacement of Bridge No. 060040 on SR 1932 (Mary's Chapel Church Rd.) over Durham Creek Tributary in Beaufort County, NC. The proposed 85' long by 30' wide two span bridge would replace the existing 61' long by 26' wide two span bridge. The proposed grade will be about 1' above existing ground within the vicinity of the bridge and roughly matching existing ground outside of the bridge.
Bridge No. 060040 is within the Tar-Pamlico River Drainage Basin and shall adhere to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into Durham Creek Tributary. Stormwater runoff from the the proposed bridge is to flow to two traffic bearing grated inlets at the north end of the bridge where it will be diffused with a riprap pad at the proposed pipe outlet. All proposed runoff is discharged as far away from the stream and at the lowest velocities as practicable. The proposed deck runoff will outlet outside of buffers.
Tar-PamlicoBuffer Rules in Effect:N/A
None
300
Two 10' paved travel lanes with 2' paved shoulders (4.83' with guardrails).
Waterbody Information
2016
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing SiteProject Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1): Class CNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
ac.Two 10' paved travel lanes with 5'-10' grassed shoulders.
300
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? NoDeck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)