State of Competitiveness

Report

GUILLERMO M. LUZGUILLERMO M. LUZGUILLERMO M. LUZGUILLERMO M. LUZ

Private Sector Co-Chairman

National Competitiveness CouncilNational Competitiveness CouncilNational Competitiveness CouncilNational Competitiveness Council

Our Vision

� To develop more competitive Philippines

� To instill a Culture of Excellence in Governance

� To use Public-Private Sector Partnerships as a

development enginedevelopment engine

Mandate : Executive Order 44

� Advise the President on policy matters affecting competitiveness of the country

� Promote and develop competitiveness strategies and push for the implementation of an action agenda for competitiveness and link it to the Philippine Development Plan the Philippine Development Plan

� Provide inputs to the Philippine Development Plan, Investment Priorities Plan, Export Development Plan

� Recommend to Congress proposed legislation regarding country competitiveness

� Strategize and execute steps to improve Philippine competitiveness rankings

NCC

EDUCATION & HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

(HRD)

Grace Mirasol

INFRASTRUCTURE

Elmer Lucero

TRANSACTION COST & FLOWS

BUSINESS PERMIT & LICENSING

SYSTEM (BPLS)

PERFORMANCE GOVERNANCE

SYSTEM(PGS)

Malou Gesilva

IMPROVED BUDGET

TRANSPARENCY

Sarah Lope

POWER & ENERGY

A. Barbero

ANTI-CORRUPTION

Angie Tayona

JUDICIARY

Elmer Lucero

NATIONALIT GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

Malou Gesilva

AGRI-BUSINESS

Jonathan Cabaltera

SECRETARIAT

COUNTRY BRAND

(BPLS)

Kim Barquilla

NATIONAL

SINGLE

WINDOW

(NSW)

PHILIPPINE

BUSINESS

REGISTRY

(PBR)

Dir. Ernani Dionisio

NAIA & MACTAN-CEBU

PEP School feeding

Working Group Date Time

1. Education & HR Development Every 2nd Thursday of the month 10:00 AM

2. Infrastructure Every 2nd Friday of the month 10:00 AM

3. BPLS Every 2nd Monday of the month 02:30 PM

4. PGS Every 2nd Wednesday of the month 02:30 PM

5. Anti-Corruption Every 3rd Thursday of the month 02:30 PM

6. Judiciary Every 4th Friday of the month 02:30 PM

7. Improved Budget Transparency Every 2nd Tuesday of the month 01:00 PM

8. National IT Governance Framework

9. Agribusiness

10. PBR

Schedule of monthly meeting per Working Group

Our Mission

To build up long-term competitiveness of the

Philippines through –

opolicy reforms

project implementationoproject implementation

o institution-building

operformance monitoring

ogoal-setting

Work Program

� Benchmark against key global competitiveness indices

� Map each indicator to the agency responsible

� Focus on lowest-ranking indicators� Focus on lowest-ranking indicators

� Track city competitiveness and key indicators

� Working Groups concentrate on specific projects

� Link Competitiveness Plan to Philippine Development Plan, National Budget, LEDAC, Cabinet Agenda

2011 Performance

World Economic Forum GCI +10

IFC Ease of Doing Business - 2(following a +14 re-rating due to methodology change)

IMD World Competitiveness Report - 2IMD World Competitiveness Report - 2

Transparency International +5

Millennium Challenge Account Pass

Country Brand Index -13

Where we are today

� WEF Global Competitiveness Report : No. 75 / 142 (2011)No. 7 of 8 in ASEAN

� IFC Doing Business Survey : No. 136 / 183 (2011)No. 7 of 8 in ASEANNo. 7 of 8 in ASEAN

� IMD World Competitiveness Report : No. 43/59 (2012)No. 5 of 5 in ASEAN

� FutureBrand’s Country Brand Index : No. 78 / 113 (2012)No. 15 of 20 in Asia Pacific

Our target

• WEF Global Competitiveness Report

No. 30 or higher by 2016

• IFC Doing Business Survey

No. 50 or higher by 2016 No. 50 or higher by 2016

• IMD World Competitiveness Report

No. 20 or higher by 2016

• FutureBrand’s Country Brand Index

No. 30 or higher by 2016

• No. 2 or 3 in ASEAN in all rankings

Impact : Inclusive Growth

o Higher FDI (new investments of 3-4% of GDP), from US$1.7

billion in 2010

o Double export growth to US$120 billion by 2016 with new

products and services to account for 30% of exports

o GDP Growth of 7-8% per yearo GDP Growth of 7-8% per year

o Job Growth / Lower Unemployment

o Lower Poverty Incidence : 26.5% in 2009 to 16.6% by 2015

o Growing C socioeconomic class(currently 8.6%); shrinking DE

class (currently 91%)

Sources: NSCB (Breakdown: 2010 Baseline- US$ 51.39 (goods) US$ 12.27(services) , 2016 Target- US$ 91.5 B (goods) & US$ 28.9 B

(services),

Chapter 3 Phil Development Plan (Competitive Industry Sector ), NEDA Targets; Phil. Labor and Employment Plan 2011-2016

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

GDP per capita (US$)

Why does it matter?Why does it matter?

Cambodia

China

Indonesia

Philippines

Vietnam

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

Source: IMF 2011

Why does it matter?Why does it matter?

Indonesia

MalaysiaViet Nam8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

FDI inflows (US$ million)

Source: UN 2011

Philippines

-2,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

OUR CHALLENGEWhere we stand in international metrics

OUR CHALLENGE

World Economic Forum

Global Competitiveness Rankings

2011 2010 2009 20082011 2010 2009 2008

PHILIPPINES 75 85 87 71

WEF - Global competitiveness index

PHILIPPINES vs ASEAN

Over-all rankings

COUNTRIES 2011 2010 2009 2008

SINGAPORE 2 3 3 5

MALAYSIA 21 26 24 21

BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 28 28 32 39

THAILAND 39 38 36 34

INDONESIA 46 44 54 55

VIETNAM 65 59 75 70

PHILIPPINES 75 85 87 71

CAMBODIA 97 109 110 109

� Other ASEAN Countries not included in the Survey: Laos & Myanmar

ASEAN Competitiveness RankingsASEAN Competitiveness RankingsASEAN Competitiveness RankingsASEAN Competitiveness Rankings

80th

60th

90th

70th

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

India

China

Indonesia

Malaysia

Singapore

Thailand

Global Competitiveness Index

Perc

entil

e

Bottom

60th

20th

10th

40th

30th

Median

India

Cambodia

Philippines

VietnamTop 53%

Key Drivers

Macroeconomic Management * +14

Technological Readiness +12

FDI and Technology Transfer +22

Internet Users +24Internet Users +24

Internet Bandwidth +25

Market Efficiency for Goods + 9

Institutions (Governance) * + 8

Key Constraints

Institutions (Governance) * + 8

Infrastructure * - 1

Air Transport Infrastructure - 3

Quality of Electricity Supply - 3

Innovation + 2

Labor Market Efficiency - 2Labor Market Efficiency - 2

Education *

Higher education & training + 2

Science & Math education quality - 2

Quality of primary education -11

24.4

18.3

16.5

7.9

5.7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Corruption

Inefficient government bureaucracy

Inadequate supply of infrastructure

Policy instability

Tax rates

Percent of responses (weighted totals)

The most problematic factors for

doing business in the Philippines in 2011

5.6

5.6

4.6

2.5

2.2

2.0

1.9

1.9

0.5

0.5

Crime and theft

Tax regulations

Restrictive labor regulations

Inadequately educated workforce

Access to financing

Inflation

Government instability/coups

Poor work ethic in national labor …

Foreign currency regulations

Poor public health

INDICATORS RANKING (2010) RANKING (2011) change

OVER-ALL RANKING 85/139 75/142 + 101st pillar: INSTITUTIONS 125 117 + 81.01 Property rights 99 105 - 6

PHILIPPINE COMPETITIVENESS RANKING

WEF GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS REPORT 2010 & 2011

2010 2010 2011 2011RED – bottom 20% (111 th – 139th) 25 indicators (113 th – 142nd) 21 indicators

PURPLE – bottom 40-21% (83 rd – 110th) 37 indicators (85 th – 112th) 36 indicators

ORANGE – bottom 50 – 41% (69 th – 82nd) 20 indicators (71 st– 84th) 17 indicators

BLACK (1 st – 68th) 29 indicators (1st – 70th) 37 indicators111 indicators 111 indicators

1.01 Property rights 99 105 - 61.02 Intellectual property protection 103 102 + 11.03 Diversion of public funds 135 127 + 81.04 Public trust of politicians 134 128 + 61.05 Irregular payments and bribes 128 119 + 91.06 Judicial independence 111 102 + 91.07 Favoritism in decisions of government officials 131 118 +13

1.08 Wastefulness of government spending 118 109 + 9

1.09 Burden of government regulation 126 126 01.10 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes 122 115 + 7

INDICATORS RANKING (2010) RANKING (2011) change

1.11 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging

regulations 116 118 - 2

1.12 Transparency of government policymaking 123 120 + 3

1.13 Business costs of terrorism 126 130 - 4

1.14 Business costs of crime and violence 104 112 - 8

1.15 Organized crime 106 102 + 4

1.16 Reliability of police services 105 112 - 7

1.17 Ethical behavior of firms 129 118 + 11

1.18 Strength of auditing and reporting standards 75 62 + 13

1.19 Efficacy of corporate boards 56 52 + 4

1.20 Protection of minority shareholders’ interests 80 84 - 4

1.21 Strength of investor protection* 109 111 - 2

INDICATORS RANKING (2010) RANKING (2011) change

2nd pillar: INFRASTRUCTURE 104 105 - 12.01 Quality of overall infrastructure 113 113 02.02 Quality of roads 114 100 + 142.03 Quality of railroad infrastructure 97 101 - 42.04 Quality of port infrastructure 131 123 + 82.05 Quality of air transport infrastructure 112 115 - 32.06 Available airline seat kilometers* 28 28 02.07 Quality of electricity supply 101 104 - 32.08 Fixed telephone lines* 106 103 + 32.09 Mobile telephone subscriptions* 88 92 - 4

3rd pillar: MACROECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 68 54 + 14

3.01 Government budget balance* 62 71 - 93.02 National savings rate* 74 70 + 43.03 Inflation* 73 69 + 43.04 Interest rate spread* 75 50 + 253.05 Government debt* 102 89 + 133.06 Country credit rating* 75 63 + 12

4

7

Philippines ASEAN (excl. PHL)GCI score

Philippines on the 12 pillars of the GCIPhilippines on the 12 pillars of the GCIPhilippines on the 12 pillars of the GCIPhilippines on the 12 pillars of the GCI

3.2 3.1 5.0 5.4 4.1 4.1 3.9 4.0 3.5 4.6 4.1 2.81

117 105 54 92 71 88 113 71 83 36 57 108Philippines

pillar rank

Priority Areas based on WEF Survey - 2012INDICATORS RANKING AGENCIES CONCERNED

1st pillar: Institutions

1.03 Diversion of public funds 127 DBM, Ombudsman, COA

1.04 Public trust of politicians 128 Ombudsman, Multisectoral

Anti-Corruption Council,

Congress, Senate, LGUs

1.05 Irregular payments and bribes 119 Ombudsman, COA

1.06 Judicial independence 102 DOJ, Courts, Supreme Court

1.07 Favoritism in decisions of government officials 118 Cabinet1.07 Favoritism in decisions of government officials 118 Cabinet

1.08 Wastefulness of government spending 109 DBM, COA, NEDA, OP

1.09 Burden of government regulation 126 DBM, NEDA, OP

1.10 Efficiency of legal framework in settling

disputes

115 DOJ, Courts, Supreme Courts,

Ombudsman, Sandiganbayan

1.11 Efficiency of legal framework in

challenging regulations

118 DOJ, Courts, Supreme Court

1.12 Transparency of government policymaking 120 Cabinet, NEDA

1.13 Business costs of terrorism 130 DND, DILG, PNP

1.17 Ethical behavior of firms 118 DOLE, DTI, SEC, PEZA, BOI,

Private Sector

INDICATORS RANKING AGENCIES CONCERNED

2nd pillar: Infrastructure

2.01 Quality of overall infrastructure 113 DPWH, DOTC

2.02 Quality of roads 100 DPWH

2.04 Quality of port infrastructure 123 DPWH, DOTC, PPA

2.05 Quality of air transport infrastructure 115 DOTC

2.07 Quality of electricity supply 104 DOE

2.08 Fixed telephone lines 103 NTC

Priority Areas based on WEF Survey

4th pillar: Health and primary education

4.04 Tuberculosis incidence* 119 DOH

4.09 Quality of primary education 110 DepEd

5th pillar: Higher education and training

5.04 Quality of math and science education 115 DepED, DOST, private sector

6th pillar: Market efficiency

6.06 Number of procedures required to

start a business*

134 SEC, DTI, BIR, SSS, Pag-Ibig,

PhilHealth, LGUs

6.07 Time required to start a business* 112 SEC, DTI, BIR, SSS, Pag-Ibig,

PhilHealth, LGUs

6.13 Burden of customs procedures 128 DOF, BOC

INDICATORS RANKING AGENCIES CONCERNED

7th pillar: Labor market efficiency

7.04 Hiring and firing practices 113 DOLE

7.05 Redundancy costs* 118 DOLE-NWPC

12th pillar : Innovation

12.01 Capacity for innovation 95 DOST

12.02 Quality of scientific research institutions 106 DOST, CHED

Priority Areas based on WEF Survey

12.02 Quality of scientific research institutions 106 DOST, CHED

12.03 Corporate R & D 85 Private Sector

12.04 University-Industry Collaboration 83 Academe, Private Sector

12.05 Govt procurement of advanced tech 126 DOST

12.06 Availability of scientists and engineers 97 CHED, Academe

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX

Quality of Education, ranking (2010)

PH BR CAM IND MAL SIN THAI VIET

Primary

Education 99 23 111 55 30 3 73 78

Education

System69 31 82 40 23 1 66 61

Science 112 27 111 46 31 1 57 51Science

and Math 112 27 111 46 31 1 57 51

Internet

access76 38 110 50 36 5 43 49

Source : WEF

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX

Technological readiness, ranking

(2010)PH BR CAM IND MAL SIN THAI VIET

Availability

of latest

tech

62 58 103 77 35 20 64 102

Firm-level

absorption59 71 93 65 30 15 66 60

FDI and tech

transfer88 87 38 54 16 3 34 31

Internet

users112 13 137 107 39 16 86 83

Broadband

subs84 69 107 99 62 22 88 77

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX

Innovation, ranking (2010)PH BR CAM IND MAL SIN THAI VIET

Capacity for

innovation80 83 101 30 25 17 56 32

Quality of sci

research inst108 91 106 44 32 11 59 63

Company R&D 85 80 82 26 16 8 48 33

University-

Industry R&D85 60 115 38 22 6 42 62

G procurement

of advanced

tech products

129 33 65 30 8 2 59 18

Availability of

scientists and

engineers

96 39 90 89 29 11 65 87

Patents per

million pop’n71 39 90 89 29 11 65 87

COUNTRIES 2012 2011 2010 2009

SINGAPORE 1 1 1 1

THAILAND 17 16 12 13

MALAYSIA 18 23 23 20

VIETNAM 98 90 93 92

Doing Business Survey: IFC Ease of Doing Business ReportPhilippines vs ASEAN

VIETNAM 98 90 93 92

BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 83 86 96 88

INDONESIA 129 126 122 129

PHILIPPINES 136 134 144 140CAMBODIA 138 138 145 135

IFC Ease of Doing Business Report , 2009 – 2012Philippine Global Ranking

Indicators

2012

(183

economies)

2011

(183

economies)

2010

(183

economies)

2009

(181

economies)

Over-all ranking 136 134 144 140

Starting a business 158 155 162 155

Dealing w/ construction

permits

102 98 111 105

Getting electricity 54 57 - -Getting electricity 54 57 - -

Employing Workers - - 115 126

Registering Property 117 109 102 97

Getting Credit 126 116 127 123

Protecting Investors 133 131 132 126

Paying Taxes 136 127 135 129

Trading across borders 51 54 68 58

Enforcing contracts 112 114 118 114

Resolving Insolvency 163 161 153 151

IMD World Competitiveness Report

2012

OVERALL RANKING

Country 2012 ranking 2011 ranking change

SINGAPORE 4 3 -1

MALAYSIA 14 16 + 2

THAILAND 30 27 -3

INDONESIA 42 37 -5

PHILIPPINES 43 41 -2

IMD World Competitiveness Report

20122012 RANKING 2011 RANKING CHANGE

Econ Performance

SINGAPORE 9 5 -4

MALAYSIA 10 7 -3

THAILAND 15 10 -5

INDONESIA 32 32 0INDONESIA 32 32 0

PHILIPPINES 42 29 -13

Gov’t Efficiency

SINGAPORE 2 2 0

MALAYSIA 13 17 +4

THAILAND 26 23 -3

INDONESIA 28 25 -3

PHILIPPINES 32 37 +5

Millenium

Challenge Account

The Philippines is monitored by MCA on 20 key performance indicators

The performance bar or threshold is set against a country’s economic classification

In 2011, the Philippines was classified a Low Income Country. In 2012, the classification was raised to Lower classification was raised to Lower Middle Income Country, reflecting higher GNI per capita. Thus, the bar has been set higher.

The Philippines must pass one-half of all indicators, including Rule of Law and Control of Corruption.

The country is constantly working on ways to improve its performance on these and other competitiveness indicators.

2012 Plan

o Continuous tracking of global reports

o Regional / Local Competitiveness Councils

o Industry Roadmaps

o National Competitiveness Assessment and Plan

Continuous tracking and improvements in …

WEF – Global Index

Governance and Bureaucracy

Infrastructure

IFC Doing Business Report

Starting a Business

Construction PermitsInfrastructure

Macroeconomic management

Education

Labor Market

Technological Readiness

Innovation

Construction Permits

Credit information

Enforcing Contracts

Resolving Insolvency

Regional Competitiveness Committees

o Create regional / local competitiveness councils composed

of public and private sectors

o Build template of indicators so regions can track their

competitiveness for comparison with national andcompetitiveness for comparison with national and

international regions

o Involve universities in data-collection and analysis

o Build pipeline for technical training and capacity-building

o 12 committees being set up as of 6/2012

Industry Roadmaps

• As competitive environment is created, industry and individual firms are drivers of growth and wealth creation.

• DTI will invite industries to prepare 5 - 10 year industry roadmaps

• Roadmaps should describe –• Roadmaps should describe –– State of industry today

– Other country competitors

– Potential of industry for value and employment growth

– Projected investments by industry players

– Policy environment required by industry (e.g., regulatory, infrastructure, human resources, financial, etc.)

National Competitiveness Assessment and Plan

o Annual assessment of performance indicators

o Global performance indicators linked to 6-year Philippine

Development Plan

o Creation of Long-Term Strategic Plano Creation of Long-Term Strategic Plan

o Preparation of Annual Operating Plans

o Emphasis on execution and delivery

o Creation of special unit within OP or expansion of PMS

mandate

Building Blocks

National Competitiveness

Plan

Working GroupsIndustry

Roadmaps

Regional Competitiveness

Committees

COUNTRIES WITH COMPETITIVENESS COUNCILS/COMMITTEES

We are not alone• Australia

• Argentina

• Bahrain

• Brazil

• Canada

• Chile

• Korea

• Mexico

• New Zealand

• Panama

• Philippines

• Russia• Chile

• Colombia

• Croatia

• Dominican Republic

• Egypt

• India

• Ireland

• Japan

• Russia

• Saudi Arabia

• Singapore

• Sweden

• United Kingdom

• United Arab Emirates

• United States

STATUS : 10 committees already set up as of July 2 012

NCC

Reg. 4 A

CALABARRegion

4B

MIMAROPA

Reg. 5 Bicol

Reg. 6

Western

Reg. 12

Soccksarge

CAR

(Baguio)

Reg. 3 Central Luzon

Pampanga

NCCWestern Visayas

Iloilo, Bacolod

Reg. 7

C. Visayas

CebuReg. 8

E. Visayas

Tacloban

Reg. 10

Northern Mindanao

CDO

Reg. 11

Southern Mindanao

Davao

Soccksargen

Gen. San

Region 9Zamboanga

Proposed Organizational Set-up / Activities

Regional Competitiveness Committee( 50%Public and 50% Private sector reps and academe)

Regional Development Council/Business Chambers

Executive Director/Project Director

Data Collection on

Competitiveness Indicators

Capability Building and

Training

Monitoring and Evaluation

•Annual Enterprise survey

•Customer Satisfaction Survey

• Field M & E• BPLS Baseline Data

Validation

Executive Director/Project Director

MONITORING & EVALUATION

1) Annual Enterprise Surveys

� Large-scale public opinion surveys conducted through face-to-face interviews

� Can be run among businessmen in Metro Manila and selected cities where there is a high concentration of business activity such as NCR (350 respondents), CALABA (75), Cebu (100), CDO/Iligan (75), Davao (100), Iloilo (100), Angeles (100) for a total of 900. (100), Angeles (100) for a total of 900.

� A series of FGDs conducted in these areas, in April –May in order to finalize survey agenda, sampling methodology and draft questions.

� Actual survey period should start in May (June at the latest) in time for the September 14 Integrity Summit presentation.

MONITORING & EVALUATION

• Customer Satisfaction Feedback Surveys

Quick-response, self-administered surveys covering one specific topic at a

time. First survey covered BPLS and was conducted from Jan 10 – Feb 10.

• Field Monitoring & Evaluation

In-depth field monitoring of specific Local Government Units engaged in the

Business Permits and Licensing System project (BPLS). The visits will review Business Permits and Licensing System project (BPLS). The visits will review and validate processes and forms being used as well as conduct interviews with LGU officials in charge of the process and with businessmen who have used the process. Twenty field visits will be conducted over the course of the year.

• Baseline Data CollectionCollection of basic data before and after programs are conducted in order to measure progress over time

CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING

Customer Service Excellence for the LGUs/ BPLOs (c/o CIC) Aims to enhance LGUs/BPLO’s technical knowledge, professional

attitude, and customer-orientation

Local Investment Promotion (c/o BOI)Appreciation seminar for local executives, line-agencies and private

sector organization representatives on their roles in investmentsector organization representatives on their roles in investment

promotion. It highlights the different investment promotion tools

and strategies that can be used by the different localities to

promote their area as an investment destination

Urban PlanningWith populations growing and resources limited, it is important for

LGUs and regions to properly undertake urban planning for optimal

resource management

Bicol Competitiveness Committee

Functions:

a� To monitor the LGUs on selected competitiveness

indicators�

b� To assess productivity enhancing programs of various agencies�

c� To advocate the enrolment of LGUs and key line c� To advocate the enrolment of LGUs and key line

agencies on different competitiveness systems� and

d� To propose policy and administrative reforms to improve local

competitiveness

P

R

O

P

O

Chairperson

• DTI Director

Co-Chairperson

• Private Sector

DTI shall act as the

Secretariat to the Committee

Sample - Regional Competitiveness Committee Structur e

O

S

A

L

Secretariat to the Committee

Membership

• AROs

• Academe

• Private Sector

* Executive Director/Project Director, overseer

PROPOSED INDICATORS

Assessing Local Economic Development/ Competitiveness

Broad Indicators I: Dynamism of local economy

II: Responsiveness of LGU to business needs

III: Infrastructure & Risk Assessment

IV: Quality of life

V: Cost of doing business

VI: Human resources and training

RDC - University Partner ( data collection)

RCC Dialogue

Convened 10 RCCs on June 25-26, 2012, Quest Hotel, Cebu City

• 64 participants from Regions 3, 4A, 4B, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 12, (RDC chair, co-chair, sectoral committee chairs, business chambers heads, academe presidents, DTI, NEDA, DILG and other relevant government agencies Regional Directors, development partners included USAID, INVEST, GIZ, LGSP-LED)

• Discussion/brainstorming/agreements:

- RCC organizational structure, functions and membership composition;

- Proposed framework for data gathering of Competitiveness

Indicators;- Possible areas of partnership among NCC, RCC and development

funders.

• Moving forward activities/assignments:

1. Framework on competitiveness indicators c/o Ms. Ofie Templo ofINVEST

2. list of RCC members (50% from public and 50% private sectors and academe) chair, co-chair, Exec. Director/Project Director

3. RDC Resolution papers or equivalent documents for the 3. RDC Resolution papers or equivalent documents for the creation/adoption of RCC

• NCC to conduct RCC orientation meetings in CAR, Region 4B (MIMAROPA) and other interested regions to join

• Next RCC Dialogue by 2nd week of September 2012

6/F, 361 Sen. Gil Puyat Avenue, Makati City

Telefax No. 890-4861/751-3404

Thank you !!!

email address: admin@competitive.org.ph

www.competitive.org.ph

www.governance.org.ph

facebook.com/Compete.Philippines

twitter.com/ncc_philippines