state monitoring visit montgomery county schools week of april 18, 2016

14
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Upload: gillian-owens

Post on 01-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

STATE MONITORING VISIT

Montgomery County Schools

Week of April 18, 2016

Page 2: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

North Carolina Monitoring Activities

Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all

students with disabilities

Page 3: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Alignment to State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SRP/APR)

The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) has implemented an accountability framework designed to more directly support states in improving the results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families. Section 616(a)(2) of the IDEA requires that the primary focus of IDEA monitoring be on improving educational results and functional outcomes for children with disabilities, and ensuring that states meet the IDEA program requirements.

Therefore, data for the Part B Compliance Indicators collected through this monitoring activity include:

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

Indicator 17: State Systemic Improvement

Page 4: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Alignment to the EC Division Strategic Plan

Strategy A: Provide customized support for LEAs

Objective A-1: Ensure every LEA has tools to measure fidelity of intervention and effectiveness of services

Objective A-2: Ensure every LEA collects, analyzes, and utilizes valid and reliable data, including data profile, to make informed decisions

Strategy D: Implement an effective general supervision system

Objective D-4: Implement monitoring activities to ensure compliance with State and Federal Statutes and Regulations

Page 5: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Alignment to the LEA Self-Assessment/Practice Profile

Core Element 1: Policy Compliance and Monitoring

The LEA provides training on the legal requirements of IDEA, Article 9, and NC Policies Governing Children with Disabilities

The LEA has an effective system for internal monitoring and general supervision to include IEP implementation

LEA uses effective methods and practices for resolving complaints/disputes (formal and informal) within required timelines.

Page 6: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

NC’s Monitoring Mechanisms

On-site Reviews

Program Compliance Review

Targeted On-Site Visit

Focused Monitoring

Program Review

Data Base Review

Page 7: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Program Compliance Review

Ensure compliance on a five year cycle

Identify and correct areas of noncompliance

Provide technical assistance

Page 8: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Core Components

Student Record Review

Interviews: EC Process

Service Verification

Related Services Verification

LEA Resources/Website

Licensure

Page 9: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

What Will the Auditors Do?

Two weeks prior to visit, will send list of students whose folders will be monitored

10 from each high school

15 total from the other schools in the district

Monitoring Visit

Record Review Protocol on each selected student

Post Secondary Record Review (high school folders)

Service Verification

Student Monitoring Sample Student Profile

Interviews of school administrators, EC teachers, and related service providers at selected school sites

Page 10: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Special Education Student Record Review Protocol

I. Informed Consent (CNSNT)

II. Prior Written Notice (PWN)

III. Initial Evaluation/Reevaluation (EVAL)

IV. Eligibility (EL)

V. IEP Development and Implementation (IEP)

VI. Secondary Transition (TRAN)

Page 11: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Will Receive Report Summary Page

Shows the Question; Number of Records That Met Standard; Percentage; Any Corrective Action Required

80% or Greater Meeting Standard Requires No Additional Training

Student Deficit Sheet

Any noncompliant issues on a student’s record must be fixed with holding an IEP meeting

Shows the area of noncompliance and provides a reason why the area is noncompliant

Page 12: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Student Monitoring Sample Profile

Folders on students that have been selected

Each student

Attendance

Discipline: OSS

Grades on report cards

Scores on state testing

Use a rubric to determine score

Page 13: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

Interviews

Child Find Process

Key Elements to Consider in Discipline

Process of Transferring Students Coming from Out-of-State

Secondary Transition

Page 14: STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016

End of Visit

Discuss preliminary findings with LEA, including a review of student specific deficit sheets and service verification findings

Explain available technical assistance and the correction process

Help the LEA develop preliminary plans to ensure correction of all noncompliance within required timelines