state board update: accountability system march 2013
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
State Board Update:Accountability
System
March 2013
![Page 2: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Current System is Confusing
![Page 3: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
No Child Left Behind Waiver
![Page 4: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HB 555 Passed in December 2012
![Page 5: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Report Card Measures Grouped into 6 Components
Component grades and overall grade begin in August 2015
New Report Card Based on Letter Grades
![Page 6: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Measures Phased In
2012-2013 Up to 9 Measures
2013-2014 Up to 16 Measures
2014-2015 Up to 17 Measures
2015-2016 & Beyond Up to 18 Measures
![Page 7: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Prepared for Success
K-3 Literacy
Graduation Rate
Gap Closing
Progress
Achievement
Overall Grade
Overall Grade & Components
![Page 8: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Report Card Components
AchievementPerformance Index Performance Indicators
Graduation Rate4 Year Graduation Rate 5 Year Graduation Rate
![Page 9: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Report Card Components
Gap ClosingAnnual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
ProgressValue-Added Overall, Gifted, Lowest 20% and Students with Disabilities
![Page 10: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Report Card Components
K-3 LiteracyK-3 Literacy Improvement
![Page 11: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Report Card Components
Prepared for SuccessCollege Admission Test, Dual Enrollment, Industry Credentials, Honors Diplomas, Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate
![Page 12: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Ohio’s New Local Report Card
![Page 13: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Accountability Committee Created
Held Six Meetings
Adopt Rules for Report Card
Role of the State Board
![Page 18: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
March – Present
April – Intent to Adopt
May – Public Hearings & JCARR
June – Final Adoption
Timeline for 2012-2013 LRC rules
![Page 19: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Review Recommendations
for 2012-2013
![Page 20: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Achievement Component
Performance IndicatorsPerformance Index
Michael Collins
![Page 21: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
State Indicators
2012-2013 Report Card
![Page 22: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
State Indicators – 75% Proficient
State Indicators Letter Grade
State Indicators Percentage
A 90% - 100%
B 80% - 89.9%
C 70% - 79.9%
D 50% - 69.9%
F < 50%
![Page 23: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
State Indicators
Letter Grade
State Indicators
Percentage
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 369 60.5%
B 80% - 89.9% 90 14.8%
C 70% - 79.9% 65 10.6%
D 50% - 69.9% 48 7.9%
F < 50% 38 6.4%
Total 610 100.0%
NA
![Page 24: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
State Indicators
Letter Grade
State Indicators
Percentage
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 1652 53.8%
B 80% - 89.9% 353 11.5%
C 70% - 79.9% 213 6.9%
D 50% - 69.9% 217 7.1%
F < 50% 635 20.7%
Total 3070 100.0%
NA 156
![Page 25: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
State Indicators
Letter Grade
State Indicators
Percentage
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 20 8.7%
B 80% - 89.9% 8 3.5%
C 70% - 79.9% 9 3.9%
D 50% - 69.9% 27 11.7%
F < 50% 166 72.2%
Total 230 100.0%
NA 34
![Page 26: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
State Indicators – 75% Proficient
60%15%
11%
8%6%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
9%
4% 4
%
12%
72%
Community Schools
54%
12%
7%
7%
21%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 27: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
State Indicators
2013-2014 Report Card
Change in Law
![Page 28: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
State Indicators – 80% Proficient
State Indicators Letter Grade
State Indicators Percentage
A 90% - 100%
B 80% - 89.9%
C 70% - 79.9%
D 50% - 69.9%
F < 50%
![Page 29: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
State Indicators
Letter Grade
State Indicators
Percentage
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 244 40.0%
B 80% - 89.9% 87 14.3%
C 70% - 79.9% 109 17.9%
D 50% - 69.9% 93 15.2%
F < 50% 77 12.6%
Total 610 100.0%
NA
![Page 30: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
State Indicators
Letter Grade
State Indicators
Percentage
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 1264 41.2%
B 80% - 89.9% 309 10.1%
C 70% - 79.9% 261 8.5%
D 50% - 69.9% 343 11.2%
F < 50% 893 29.1%
Total 3070 100.0%
NA 156
![Page 31: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
State Indicators
Letter Grade
State Indicators
Percentage
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 13 5.7%
B 80% - 89.9% 4 1.7%
C 70% - 79.9% 10 4.3%
D 50% - 69.9% 22 9.6%
F < 50% 181 78.7%
Total 230 100.0%
NA 34
![Page 32: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
State Indicators – 80% Proficient
40%
14%
18%
15%
13%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
6%2% 4
%
10%
79%
Community Schools
41%
10%8%
11%
29%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 33: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Performance Index
Performance Index Letter Grade
Performance Index Percentage
A 90% - 100%
B 80% - 89.9%
C 70% - 79.9%
D 50% - 69.9%
F < 50%
![Page 34: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Performance Index Letter
Grade
Performance Index
Percentage
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 30 4.9%
B 80% - 89.9% 444 72.8%
C 70% - 79.9% 118 19.3%
D 50% - 69.9% 18 3.0%
F < 50% 0 0.0%
Total 610 100.0%
NA
![Page 35: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Performance Index Letter
Grade
Performance Index
Percentage
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 215 7.1%
B 80% - 89.9% 1830 59.6%
C 70% - 79.9% 647 21.1%
D 50% - 69.9% 361 11.6%
F < 50% 19 0.6%
Total 3072 100.0%
NA 154
![Page 36: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Performance Index Letter
Grade
Performance Index
Percentage
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 3 1.3%
B 80% - 89.9% 28 11.7%
C 70% - 79.9% 68 28.3%
D 50% - 69.9% 124 51.7%
F < 50% 17 7.1%
Total 240 100.0%
NA 24
![Page 37: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Performance Index
5%
73%
19%
3%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
1%
12%
28%
52%
7%
Community Schools
7%
60%
21%
12%
1%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 38: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Weighted Acceleration3302.01(A) …the department shall assign additional weights to students who have been permitted to pass over a subject in accordance with a student acceleration policy… If such a student attains the advanced score… the department shall assign to the student an additional proportional weight, as approved by the state board.
1.3 Selected for Consistency
![Page 39: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 40: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Safe Harbor
Not later than March 31, 2013, the State Board of Education shall submit to the
General Assembly… recommendations to create a one-year safe harbor for districts
and schools for the first year of the PARCC assessments.
House Bill 555
![Page 41: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Safe Harbor
The recommendation shall include a method to exempt [schools and
districts] from sanctions and penalties prescribed by law based on report card
ratings.
House Bill 555
![Page 42: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Safe Harbor Sanctions
• Challenged School District
• Academic Distress Commission
• Educational Choice scholarships
• Community school closure
• Public school restructuring
![Page 43: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Safe Harbor Recommendation
• Report actual grade
• If safe harbor is met, calculate adjusted grade
• Sanctions for schools and districts based on adjusted grades
![Page 44: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Performance IndexB
IndicatorsB
No Component or Overall Grade
Example: 2013-2014
5 Year Grad RateC
4 Year Grad RateC
AMOsC
Value-Added: All Students
B
![Page 45: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Achievement
DProgress
B
GradRate
C
K-3 Literacy
B
AMOs
C
Prep for Success
B
Overall Grade
C
Indicators
BPI
FDrop in Performance Index (PI) grade, affecting overall grade
Example: 2014-2015
First Year of PARCC Assessments
![Page 46: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Safe Harbor?
Safe harbor statistical calculation(Met or Not Met)
Maintain performance compared to other schools and districts?
If Met, adjusted safe harbor grades
used to determine sanctions
![Page 47: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Achievement
BProgress
B
GradRate
C
K-3 Literacy
B
AMOs
C
Prep for Success
B
“Safe Harbor” Overall Grade
B
Indicators
B“Safe Harbor” PI
B
Example: 2014-2015 – Safe Harbor
Sanctions based on Adjusted Grade
2013-2014 PI grade used
![Page 48: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 49: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Graduation Rate
4 Year Rate 5 Year Rate
Stephanie Dodd
![Page 50: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
4 Year Graduation Rate
Grad Rate – Four Year Letter Grade
Grad Rate – Four Year Percentage
A 93% - 100%
B 89% - 92.9%
C 84% - 88.9%
D 79% - 83.9%
F < 79%
![Page 51: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Grad Rate Four Year
Letter Grade
Grad Rate Four Year
Percentage
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A 93% - 100% 247 40.50%
B 89% - 92.9% 171 28.00%
C 84% - 88.9% 109 17.90%
D 79% - 83.9% 43 7.00%
F < 79% 40 6.60%
Total 610 100.00%
![Page 52: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Grad Rate Four Year
Letter Grade
Grad Rate Four Year
Percentage
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 93% - 100% 271 36.97%
B 89% - 92.9% 187 25.51%
C 84% - 88.9% 123 16.78%
D 79% - 83.9% 57 7.78%
F < 79% 95 12.96%
Total 733 100.00%
![Page 53: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Grad Rate Four Year
Letter Grade
Grad Rate Four Year
Percentage
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 93% - 100% 1 1.80%
B 89% - 92.9% 1 1.80%
C 84% - 88.9% 3 5.40%
D 79% - 83.9% 1 1.80%
F < 79% 50 89.30%
Total 56 100.00%
![Page 54: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
4 Year Graduation Rate
40%
28%
18%
7%
6%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
2% 2%5% 2
%
89%
Community Schools
37%
26%
17%
8%
13%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 55: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
5 Year Graduation Rate
Grad Rate – Five Year Letter Grade
Grad Rate – Five Year Percentage
A 95% - 100%
B 90% - 94.9%
C 85% - 89.9%
D 80% - 84.9%
F < 80%
![Page 56: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Grad Rate Five Year
Letter Grade
Grad Rate Five Year
Percentage
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A 95% - 100% 152 25.00%
B 90% - 94.9% 245 40.20%
C 85% - 89.9% 119 19.50%
D 80% - 84.9% 55 9.00%
F < 80% 38 6.20%
Total 609 100.00%
![Page 57: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Grad Rate Five Year
Letter Grade
Grad Rate Five Year
Percentage
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 95% - 100% 167 23.00%
B 90% - 94.9% 270 37.20%
C 85% - 89.9% 134 18.50%
D 80% - 84.9% 65 9.00%
F < 80% 90 12.40%
Total 726 100.00%
![Page 58: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Grad Rate Five Year
Letter Grade
Grad Rate Five Year
Percentage
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 95% - 100% 2 4.40%
B 90% - 94.9% 1 2.20%
C 85% - 89.9% 2 4.40%
D 80% - 84.9% 4 8.90%
F < 80% 36 80.00%
Total 45 100.00%
![Page 59: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
5 Year Graduation Rate
25%
40%
20%
9%
6%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
4% 2%4%
9%
80%
Community Schools
23%
37%
18%
9%
12%
Traditional Buildings
![Page 60: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 61: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Gap Closing
Annual Measurable Objectives(AMOs)
C. Todd Jones
![Page 62: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
AMOLetter Grade
AMO Percentage
A 90% - 100%
B 80% - 89.9%
C 70% - 79.9%
D 60% - 69.9%
F < 60%
![Page 63: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
AMOLetter Grade
AMO Percentage
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 28 4.6%
B 80% - 89.9% 207 33.9%
C 70% - 79.9% 142 23.3%
D 60% - 69.9% 83 13.6%
F < 60% 150 24.6%
Total 610 100.0%
![Page 64: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
AMOLetter Grade
AMOPercentage
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 776 25.5%
B 80% - 89.9% 507 16.7%
C 70% - 79.9% 310 10.2%
D 60% - 69.9% 303 10.0%
F < 60% 1143 37.6%
Total 3039 100.0%
![Page 65: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
AMOLetter Grade
AMOPercentage
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A 90% - 100% 24 12.8%
B 80% - 89.9% 12 6.4%
C 70% - 79.9% 6 3.2%
D 60% - 69.9% 6 3.2%
F < 60% 139 74.3%
Total 187 100.0%
![Page 66: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
AMOs
5%
34%
23%
14%
25%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
13%
6%3%3%
74%
Community Schools
26%
17%
10%10%
38%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 67: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 68: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Progress
Value Added:Overall
Gifted StudentsLowest 20%
Students with Disabilities
Bryan Williams
![Page 69: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Value-Added
Value-Added Letter Grade
Value-Added Gain Index
A > = 2.0
B >= 1 and < 2
C >= -1 and < 1
D >= -2 and < -1
F < -2
![Page 70: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Value-Added: OverallValue Added: Overall Letter
Grade
Value Added: Overall Gain
Index
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 216 35.4%
B >= 1 and < 2 86 14.1%
C >= -1 and < 1 155 25.4%
D >= -2 and < -1 62 10.1%
F < -2 92 15.1%
Total 611 100.0%
NA 3
![Page 71: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Value-Added: OverallValue Added: Overall Letter
Grade
Value Added: Overall Gain
Index
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 702 29.6%
B >= 1 and < 2 335 14.1%
C >= -1 and < 1 674 28.4%
D >= -2 and < -1 223 9.4%
F < -2 436 18.4%
Total 2370 100.0%
NA 856
![Page 72: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Value-Added: OverallValue Added: Overall Letter
Grade
Value Added: Overall Gain
Index
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 55 24.6%
B >= 1 and < 2 29 12.9%
C >= -1 and < 1 62 27.7%
D >= -2 and < -1 29 12.9%
F < -2 49 21.9%
Total 224 100.0%
NA 40
![Page 73: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Value-Added: Overall
35%
14%25%
10%
15%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
25%
13%
28%
13%
22%
Community Schools
30%
14%28%
9%
18%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 74: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Value-Added: Gifted Students
![Page 75: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Value Added: Gifted Letter
Grade
Value Added: Gifted Gain
Index
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 79 12.9%
B >= 1 and < 2 93 15.2%
C >= -1 and < 1 275 45.0%
D >= -2 and < -1 86 14.1%
F < -2 45 7.4%
Total 578 94.6%
NA 36
![Page 76: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Value Added: Gifted Letter
Grade
Value Added: Gifted Gain
Index
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 244 12.9%
B >= 1 and < 2 311 16.5%
C >= -1 and < 1 877 46.4%
D >= -2 and < -1 272 14.4%
F < -2 186 9.8%
Total 1890 100.0%
NA 1336
![Page 77: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Value Added: Gifted Letter
Grade
Value Added: Gifted Gain
Index
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 0 0.0%
B >= 1 and < 2 0 0.0%
C >= -1 and < 1 2 50.0%
D >= -2 and < -1 0 0.0%
F < -2 2 50.0%
Total 4 100.0%
NA 260
![Page 78: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Value-Added: Gifted
14%
16%
48%
15%
7%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
50%50%
Community Schools
13%
17%
46%
14%
10%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 79: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Value-Added: Lowest 20% in Achievement
![Page 80: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Value Added: Lowest 20% Letter Grade
Value Added: Lowest 20% Gain Index
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 108 18.2%
B >= 1 and < 2 86 14.5%
C >= -1 and < 1 269 45.4%
D >= -2 and < -1 66 11.1%
F < -2 63 10.6%
Total 2163 100.0%
NA 1090
![Page 81: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Value Added: Lowest 20% Letter Grade
Value Added: Lowest 20% Gain Index
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 268 12.5%
B >= 1 and < 2 393 18.4%
C >= -1 and < 1 1020 47.8%
D >= -2 and < -1 273 12.8%
F < -2 182 8.5%
Total 2163 100.0%
NA 1090
![Page 82: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Value Added: Lowest 20% Letter Grade
Value Added: Lowest 20% Gain Index
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 43 20.8%
B >= 1 and < 2 33 15.9%
C >= -1 and < 1 73 35.3%
D >= -2 and < -1 29 14.0%
F < -2 29 14.0%
Total 207 100.0%
NA 57
![Page 83: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Value-Added: Lowest 20%
18%
15%
45%
11%
11%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
21%
16%
35%
14%
14%
Community Schools
13%
18%
48%
13%
9%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 84: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Value-Added: Students with
Disabilities
![Page 85: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Value Added: Students with
Disabilities Letter Grade
Value Added: Students with Disabilities Gain Index
School Districts Based on 2012
Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 116 19.0%
B >= 1 and < 2 108 17.7%
C >= -1 and < 1 241 39.4%
D >= -2 and < -1 78 12.8%
F < -2 46 7.5%
Total 589 96.4%
NA 25
![Page 86: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Value Added: Students with Disabilities Letter Grade
Value Added: Students with Disabilities Gain Index
Traditional Buildings Based
on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 287 13.9%
B >= 1 and < 2 379 18.4%
C >= -1 and < 1 978 47.5%
D >= -2 and < -1 245 11.9%
F < -2 170 8.3%
Total 2059 100.0%
NA 1167
![Page 87: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Value Added: Students with Disabilities Letter Grade
Value Added: Students with Disabilities Gain Index
Community Schools Based on
2012 Data
Count Percentage
A > = 2.0 18 13.6%
B >= 1 and < 2 18 13.6%
C >= -1 and < 1 61 46.2%
D >= -2 and < -1 16 12.1%
F < -2 19 14.4%
Total 132 100.0%
NA 207
![Page 88: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Value-Added: Students with Disabilities
19%
18%39%
13%
8%
Schools Districts
A B C D F
14%
14%
46%
12%
14%
Community Schools
14%
18%
48%
12%
8%
Traditional Build-ings
![Page 89: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 90: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
K- 3 Literacy
Tom Gunlock
2013-2014 – Measure Graded
2014-2015 – Component Graded
![Page 91: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
2013-2014 – Measures Reported
2014-2015 – Component Graded
Prepared for Success
Debe Terhar
![Page 92: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Communications and Feedback
![Page 93: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Next Steps
![Page 94: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
March – PresentApril – Intent to Adopt
May – Public Hearings & JCARRJune – Final Adoption
Timeline for 2012-2013 LRC rules
![Page 95: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
LRC Rollout TimelineAugust 2013
New Graded Measures
Performance Indicators
Performance Index
4 Year Graduation Rate
5 Year Graduation Rate
Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs)
Value-Added: All Students
Value-Added: Gifted Students
Value-Added: Lowest 20% in Achievement
Value-Added: Students with Disabilities
New Graded ComponentNone
![Page 96: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
LRC Rollout TimelineAugust 2014
New Graded ComponentNone
New Graded Measure
K-3 Literacy Improvement
New Reported MeasuresCollege Admission Test
Dual Enrollment
Industry Credentials
Honors Diploma
Advanced Placement
International Baccalaureate
![Page 97: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
LRC Rollout TimelineAugust 2015
Overall Grade Calculated
New Graded Components
Achievement
Progress
Gap Closing
Graduation Rate
K-3 Literacy
Prepared for Success
New Graded Measure
None
New Reported MeasureCollege & Career Ready Assessment
![Page 98: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
LRC Rollout TimelineAugust 2016
Overall Grade Calculated
New Graded Measure
Value-Added: High School
New Reported MeasureNone
New Graded ComponentNone
![Page 99: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Questions
![Page 100: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Dropout Prevention and Recovery
Academic Performance Rating and Report
Card System
March 2013
![Page 101: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
HB 555 Passed in December 2012
![Page 102: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Enact rules for dropout prevention and recovery (DOPR) performance levels and benchmarks
![Page 103: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Benchmarks for
7 Report Card Indicators
No indicator ratings in 2013
2013
![Page 104: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Add benchmark for 1 additional indicator
Prescribe Overall Rating Designation (not to be used until 2015)
2014
![Page 105: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Graduation Rates:4 Year Graduation Rate 5 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate7 Year Graduation Rate8 Year Graduation Rate
2013 RuleReport Card Indicator Benchmarks
![Page 106: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
2013 RuleReport Card Indicator Benchmarks
High School Assessment Passage
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
![Page 107: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Additional HB 555 Charges
Review Ohio dropout prevention and recovery data
Consult with Ohio stakeholders
Consult with other states’ departments of education
![Page 108: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Arizona
California
Colorado
Florida
Texas
![Page 109: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Ohio is the only state establishing a report
card system that includes high stakes
consequences
![Page 110: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Review RuleRecommendations
for OAC 3301-102-10
![Page 111: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Graduation Rate
4 Year Rate 5 Year Rate6 Year Rate7 Year Rate8 Year Rate
![Page 112: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
DOPR Ratings
4 Year Graduation
Rate Benchmarks
SchoolsBased on 2011 Data
Count Percentage
Exceeds Standards
30% - 100% 21 25.3%
Meets Standards 7% - 29.9% 40 48.2%
Does Not Meet Standards
0% - 6.9% 22 26.5%
Total 83 100.0%
![Page 113: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
DOPR Ratings
5 Year Graduation
Rate Benchmarks
Schools Based on 2011 Data
Count Percentage
Exceeds Standards
39% - 100% 18 25.4%
Meets Standards 12% - 38.9% 35 49.3%
Does Not Meet Standards
0% - 11.9% 18 25.4%
Total 71 100.1%
![Page 114: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
DOPR Ratings
6, 7, 8 Year Graduation
Rate Benchmarks
Schools Based on 2011 Data
Count Percentage
Exceeds Standards
39% - 100% Not Available
Not Available
Meets Standards 12% - 38.9% Not Available
Not Available
Does Not Meet Standards
0% - 11.9% Not Available
Not Available
![Page 115: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
High School Assessment
Passage
![Page 116: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
DOPR Ratings
High School Assessment
Passage RateBenchmarks
Schools Based on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
Exceeds Standards
59% - 100% 22 25.9%
Meets Standards 18% - 58.9% 41 48.2%
Does Not Meet Standards
0% - 17.9% 22 25.9%
Total 85 100.0%
![Page 117: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
![Page 118: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
DOPR Ratings
AMOBenchmarks
SchoolsBased on 2012 Data
Count Percentage
Exceeds Standards
33% - 100% 4 25.0%
Meets Standards 5% - 32.9% 8 50.0%
Does Not Meet Standards
0% - 4.9% 4 25.0%
Total 16 100.0%
![Page 119: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
By March, 2015
Based on analysis of 2013 and 2014 dropout prevention and recovery data
Review performance levels and amend benchmarks if warranted
Statement of Intent
![Page 120: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Next Steps
![Page 121: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
March –Intent to Adopt
April – JCARR Filing
May – Public HearingsJune – Final Adoption
Timeline for 2013 DOPR rule
![Page 122: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
DOPR Report Card Rollout Timeline
2012-2013
- 4, 5, and 6 Year Graduation Rate- High School Assessment Passage- AMOs- No ratings
2013-2014
- 4, 5, 6, and 7 Year Graduation Rate- High School Assessment Passage- AMOs- Indicators rated- Growth reported, if available- Student outcomes reported
2014-2015
- 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 Year Graduation Rate
- High School Assessment Passage- AMOs- Growth- Indicators rated- Student outcomes reported- Overall DesignationSchools first identified for closure 2015-2016
![Page 123: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Success for Each Student
![Page 124: State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649e995503460f94b9bb0c/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Questions