standard i · web view: software, computer hardware, tvs, and vcrs used to support the nursing...
TRANSCRIPT
Systematic Program Evaluation PlanSYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard I
Mission/Philosophy/ Conceptual Framework
DefinitionsMission: A philosophy or creed focusing on the character, role development, values, and contributions of graduates for the nursing profession and the communities they serve.
Philosophy: Provides a viewpoint and implies a system of values and beliefs. It gives meaning to experiences, and directs behavior and attitudes.
Conceptual framework: A concept, theory, or basic idea around which an educational framework is organized and developed.
Philosophy level of achievement: 100% of the nursing faculty agree that the RN-BSN Nursing Mission, philosophy, and conceptual framework are congruent with the Olympic College Mission, Vision, and Value Statements.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement.
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Mission
Philosophy (Vision)
Conceptual framework
RN-BSN Student Handbook, college catalog, and online
Nursing faculty and Associate Dean of Nursing
Annually in spring
Comparative analysis of Nursing Unit Mission, philosophy, and conceptual framework with and Olympic College Mission, Vision, and Values Statements
Congruence between Nursing and Olympic College
All RN-BSN Program syllabi reflect Nursing Mission Statement.
Reflected in RN-BSN Handbook.
1
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard I
Mission/Philosophy/ Conceptual Framework
(continued)
DefinitionsMission: A philosophy or creed focusing on the character, role development, values, and contributions of graduates for the nursing profession and the communities they serve.
Philosophy: Provides a viewpoint and implies a system of values and beliefs. It gives meaning to experiences, and directs behavior and attitudes.
Conceptual framework: A concept, theory, or basic idea around which an educational framework is organized and developed.
Philosophy level of achievement: 100% of the nursing faculty agree the RN-BSN Nursing Mission, philosophy, and conceptual framework are congruent with the Olympic College Mission, Vision, and Value Statements.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement.
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
2016-20172017-20182018-2019
100% of the nursing faculty agree the RN-BSN Nursing Mission, philosophy, and conceptual framework are congruent with the Olympic College Mission, Vision, and Values statements.
2
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard I
Faculty, administrator, and students participate in governance as defined by the governing organization and nursing education unit.
Definitions
Faculty: Faculty teaching in the RN-BSN Program.
Administrator: Associate Dean of Nursing.
Students: Those admitted into the RN-BSN Program.
Level of achievement: Nursing Program is represented on Olympic College Campus Committees (including governance).
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Governance of institution
Faculty meeting minutes
Campus Committee meeting minutes
IPC minutes
IAM minutes
RN-BSN Student/Faculty Governance Committee Meeting Minutes
Faculty
Associate Dean of Nursing
Yearly Faculty will document participation in campus committees in professional development files, division faculty meetings.
IPC and IAM minutes
RN-BSN faculty Governance meeting minutes
The Nursing Program has representation on campus governance and college-wide committees.
2018-2019A nursing representative participated on the budget committee.
2016-20172017-20182018-2019 A nursing representative participates on college-wide accreditation, budget, FCC, AHE, ATD, safety, harassment, distance learning, Learning Assessment Council, RN-BSN Faculty Curriculum Team, RN-BSN admissions, and hiring committees.
RN-BSN Student/Faculty Governance Committee.2016-20172017-20182018-2019 Associate Dean of Nursing participates in bi-monthly President’s Council meetings, IAM, Mission Fulfillment Team, and IPC.
Continue faculty and student attendance and participation.
Associate Dean of Nursing will participate in Instructional Administrators Meetings (IAM) and Instructional Policies Committee (IPC), and President’s Council, Mission Fulfillment Team as scheduled.
RN-BSN student representatives will participate in quarterly student/faculty governance meetings.
3
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN(continued) Strategies that have been or will be used to
address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
RN-BSN faculty meetings
RN-BSN faculty meeting minutes
Faculty
Associate Dean of Nursing
Quarterly and as needed
Evaluation of content of meetings
RN-BSN meeting minutes will reflect issues raised by students/faculty and actions to be taken.
RN-BSN Team consistently attend scheduled RN-BSN Curriculum Program meetings.
*please see meeting minutes for fall 2016-summer 2019.
Students participate in governance of the organization and nursing unit
Campus Committee meeting minutes
Student/Faculty governance committee meeting minutes.
Committees will meet as scheduled quarterly in fall, winter and spring.
4
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard I
Policies of Nursing Unit Consistent with Governing Institution
Definition: Policies of nursing unit consistent with governing institution. Level of achievement: 100% of policies of nursing unit are consistent with the policies of the governing institution or differences are justified by program purposes.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Policies of nursing unit
Differences are justified by the nursing unit goals and objectives.
Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)
Nursing faculty As new policies specific to nursing are revised or established
Comparative review of nursing policies and college-wide policies
Met.
2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Level of achievement met: There are no policies relative to faculty or to program operation specific to the Nursing Program. Nursing is consistent with other faculty policies. These are available in the CBA and policies and procedures for Olympic College faculty.
Same.
RN-BSN faculty load is 450 hrs. per year.
2016-2019:RN-BSN class size limited to 25 in writing intensive courses.
.
5
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard I
Nursing Student Program Policies and Procedures
Definition: Directions that guide RN-BSN Program activities for prospective and in-program students and faculty.
Level of achievement: 100% of nursing faculty agree that RN-BSN Program policies and procedures are congruent with the governing institution, accessible, non-discriminatory, and consistently applied. Differences are justified by nursing education unit purposes.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used for
Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Academic Admission,Progression,Grading,Retention,Withdrawal,Dismissal,Graduation requirements
AdmissionProcedure Packet
RN-BSN Student Handbook
Associate Dean of Nursing in collaboration with nursing faculty
Annually or as needed
Review and compare policies and procedures with college policies and identify rationale for any differences.
Review and approval by Instructional Policies Council (IPC)
Level of achievement met.
100% of RN-BSN faculty agree that policies in place are congruent with governing institution, accessible, non-discriminatory, and consistently applied.
Policies that differ are justified. They are: Competitive
admissions Progression standards CPR for Healthcare
Providers Immunizations Professional liability
insurance
Students receive information in RN-BSN info sessions, brochures, catalog, nursing web site, student handbook, and syllabi.
2019: Non-discrimination, sexual misconduct (and other discrimination and harassment), disability and pregnancy-related adjustments and accommodations, and authorized absences for reasons of faith or conscience policies were added to Olympic College
2019: Progression plan policy was amended in the RN-BSN program.
Continue annual review.
2016-2019:Personalized educational plans created annually by the RN-BSN recruiter. Students are required to sign and return.
2019: New college policies and RN-BSN program policy were added to the RN-BSN Program Student Handbook and online.
Non–academic Complaint procedure,Grade appeal,Non-discrimination, Sexual harassment
OC catalogOC website
6
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard I
Nursing Program Public DocumentsDefinition: Written documents that describe the program purpose, curriculum, and requirements for progression and graduation.
Level of achievement: All public documents are accurate and consistent.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area (s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Admission procedure
Application packet,OC catalog,RN-BSN brochure, information session PowerPoint,RN-BSN Student Handbook and Website
RN-BSN Recruiter
Annually and as needed
Comparative analysis
2016-20172017-20182018-2019Public documents are accurate and consistent.
Continue annual review, and update as needed.
The RN-BSN Recruiter is tasked with keeping all program information current, consistent, and accurate.
RN-BSN Student Handbook reviewed and revised every summer.
Program progression
RN-BSN brochure,OC catalog,RN-BSN Student Handbook
BSN degree requirements
OC catalogApplication packetBSN websiteRN-BSN Student Handbook
7
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard I
Nursing Program ComplaintsDefinition: Expression of dissatisfaction about something or someone that is the cause or subject of protest. A formal allegation against a party or institution usually expressed in a signed, written statement.
Level of achievement: No more than three complaints are made against the RN-BSN Program per year. 100% of written documentation of Nursing Program complaints will reflect compliance with stated Olympic College procedures. Complaints are used for program improvement, if appropriate.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area (s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Grade appeals procedure
Associate Dean of Nursing files
Associate Dean of Nursing
Ongoing, as complaints arise
Review, investigate, discuss, and analyze the complaint for accuracy, validity, and consistency, per stipulated policy and procedures.
Rationale: To ensure students are not treated capriciously and arbitrarily and that policies and procedures are accurately followed.
2016-2017:No formal complaints
2017-2018:No formal complaints
2018-2019:No formal complaints
See Standard IV on Self-Study
2016-2019:Nursing Programs report directly to VPI.
Current policies and procedures are same.
Student complaint procedure
Vice President of Student Services files
Associate Dean of Nursing
Sexual harassment policy
Human Resources Office
Vice President of Students Services
Non-discrimination policy
Associate Dean of Nursing
Director of Human Resources
8
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard I
Student/Faculty Governance Committee (SFGC)
Definition: Committee whose purpose is to solicit student feedback on program components. The RN-BSN SFGC will be a conduit for ongoing assessment, evaluation, revision, and development, leading to an excellent RN-BSN program.
Level of achievement: Two student representatives from each cohort will meet quarterly with the RN-BSN Curriculum Committee.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
Student/faculty governance
Meeting minutes RN-BSN Curriculum Committee
Quarterly, excluding summer
Discussion and meeting minutes
*please see meeting minutes for fall 2016-summer 2019.
Continue to meet quarterly.
9
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Nursing Administrator (Associate Dean of Nursing)
Definitions
Nursing Administrator: A nurse who is academically and experientially qualified for the Nursing Administrator position, and who has the authority and responsibility for development and administration of the program. Level of achievement: Nursing Administrator has a Master of Nursing degree and a doctoral degree in either nursing or a health or related educational field (WAC 246-840-517) with experience in teaching and administration. Associate Dean of Nursing has authority and responsibility for program development and administration.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Associate Dean of Nursing
Associate Dean of Nursing position description
Associate Dean of Nursing
Annually by Human Resources and Nursing Program.
Compare Associate Dean of Nursing position description to the minimum desired qualifications as specified by the Washington NCQAC.
The Associate Dean of Nursing meets the academic requirements with a Master of Nursing and PhD degrees and more than 20 years of nursing practice. She taught and developed curricula in the ADN program, transition to associate degree (TADN) program and RN-BSN Program at Olympic College as well as the Advanced Practice Immersion graduate program at Seattle University. Her leadership experience in policy development, multi-disciplinary project management, current knowledge in evidence-based practices, innovative teaching strategies, and curriculum development provides a background for
Associate Dean continues to attend conferences to develop administrative skills and abilities. 2012-2013: Enrolled in EdD Program2013-2014 Enrolled in EdD Program2014-2015 Enrolled in EdD Program2015-2016 Enrolled in EdD Program
Faculty will evaluate Associate Dean’s performance each spring.
2016-2017 earned doctorate.Assumed pro-tem position on the Nursing Care Quality Assurance Commission (NCQAC)2018-2019.Interim Associate Dean appointed as former dean resigned. Interim Associate Dean is also experientially qualified with 45 years nursing practice and expertise in curriculum development and
10
leadership as the Associate Dean of Nursing at Olympic College.
The Associate Dean of Nursing, per faculty review, has the authority and responsibility for the development and administration of the program.
education. 2019-2020New Associate Dean assumed position in August 2019.
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
11
Standard II
Nursing faculty are academically and experientially qualified.
Definitions
Nursing faculty: Theory and Fieldwork nursing instructors in the RN-BSN program. Level of achievement: All full-time nursing faculty have a minimum of a Master of Nursing degree, have at least five years of Fieldwork expertise, and meet Washington (WA) NCQAC requirements. All part-time nursing faculty meet WA NCQAC requirements. All RN-BSN faculty engage in professional development activities.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Faculty members’ academic and experiential qualifications
Human Resources:faculty personnel files
Tenure binders/PortfoliosPost tenure review documentation
Executive Director of Human Resources
Associate Dean of Nursing
Faculty
Upon hiring
Annually in spring
TenureQuarterly for 3 yearsEvery 5 years
Human Resources and Nursing Screening Committees review qualifications in comparison with expectations of NCQAC and accreditation.
Comparison to PCEC guidelines.
Attainment of professional development goals.
Classroom observation.
1. All full-time and part-time nursing faculty have a Master of Nursing degree or higher and meet NCQAC standards.
2. All faculty engage in professional development activities that allow for maintenance of expertise in areas of responsibility.
3. All tenure track and tenured faculty received approval of tenure committee.
Increase number of doctoral prepared nursing faculty as enrollment increases. 2013-20142014-2015Two current faculty are in year two of an EdD program. 2015-20162016-2017One current faculty is enrolled in EdD program.2017-20182018-2019
Continue current standards. 2013-2014Three adjunct, and one tenure-track nursing faculty are PhD prepared.2014-2015Three adjunct, and one tenured nursing faculty are PhD prepared.
2015-20163 adjunct and 3 tenured faculty with doctorates.
2017-20183 adjunct and 3 tenured faculty with doctorates.
2018-20192 adjunct and 4 tenured faculty with doctorates.
2015-2016Two faculty awarded doctorates. 2017-2018Faculty for Community Health and Population Theory course promoted to County Health Department director. Certified in Public Health.
Electronic Tenure binders/Portfolios were instituted. 2018-2019 One faculty awarded doctorate.
12
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Nursing faculty are academically and experientially qualified.
Area of qualification:Teaching
Definitions: The scholarship of teaching is conducted through: application of knowledge of the discipline or specialty area in the teaching-learning process; the development of innovative teaching and evaluation methods; program development; learning outcome evaluation; and professional role modeling.
Level of achievement: 100% of RN-BSN tenured faculty Professional Development Plans (PDPs) will reflect application of nursing knowledge in the teaching-learning process, the development of innovative teaching and evaluation methods, program development, learning outcome evaluation, and professional role modeling.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Teaching Professional Development Plans (PDP)
Tenure track faculty
Faculty Every five years
PDP Individual faculty evaluations and peer evaluations available in faculty files.
See appendix on faculty development in Self-Study
2016-2017Interactive synchronous distance education developed for Nursing Informatics course2018-2019 Interactive. 2017-2018Interactive synchronous distance education developed for Nursing Research course.
Participation in faculty development opportunities encouraged.
2013-20142015-20162016-20172017-2018 one course by interactive television2018-2019 two courses by interactive television
2017-2018 Nursing Informatics taught by Interactive television 2018-2019Nursing Research taught by Interactive television
Associate Dean of Nursing
Quarterly, for non-tenured and adjunct faculty, per CBA
Student evaluations for non-tenured faculty
Student and peer evaluations
13
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Nursing faculty are academically and experientially qualified.
Area of qualification:Practice
Definitions: Fieldwork expertise in nursing as evidenced by professional certifications, master’s degree or higher, and other specialty credentials and peer evaluations of practice.
Level of achievement: 40% of full-time RN-BSN faculty will have professional certifications. 100% will have a Master of Nursing or higher and 20% will have specialty credentials.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Expertise in Fieldwork practice
Professional Development Plans (PDP)
PCEC Minutes
Curriculum Vitae
Specialty certificates
Peer evaluations
Faculty
Associate Dean of Nursing
Annually Review of PDP
Curriculum Vitae
Peer evaluation tool
100% have Master of Nursing degreeWith emphasis in community health or maternal child nursing Advanced practice certification. 2013-2014 2014-20152015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Specialty Credentials2013-2014 100%2014-2015 75%2015-2016 33%2016-2017 50%2017-2018 50%2018-2019 50%
One faculty (2016) employed in areas of nursing specialization to substantiate current Fieldwork expertise.
2013-20142014-20152015-20162016-2017One faculty employed in community health specialty area. 2017-2018Two faculty employed in community health specialty. 2018-2019Two faculty are employed in areas of nursing specialization to substantiate current Fieldwork expertise
14
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Nursing faculty are academically and experientially qualified.
Area of qualification: Service
Definitions: Participation on committees for the college, RN-BSN program, or community committees. Includes mentoring of students and faculty.
Level of achievement: 100% of full-time RN-BSN faculty will serve on college committees, RN-BSN program committees, and/or community committees.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Service Meeting minutes or committee rosters
Faculty
Associate Dean of Nursing
Year Meeting rosters of college or RN-BSN program committees
Community meeting minutes
Holk (2013-2019)Curriculum CommitteeBSN TeamBSN Student/Faculty Governance KCHP/OC CommitteeDestination ImaginationCCNE-Continuous Improvement Process Report CommitteeEvaluation CommitteeTenure Committees (3) Faculty and dean search committees Wareham (2013-2019)Faculty Curriculum CouncilEvaluation CommitteeCurriculum Committee Doherty (2013-2019)Tenure Committees (3)Evaluation CommitteeCurriculum CommitteeBSN Team CommitteeCCNE-Continuous Improvement Process Report Committee Mulligan ((2013-2019)Distance Learning CommitteeBSN Student/Faculty GovernanceBSN Team CommitteeCurriculum Committee, chairCCNE-Continuous Improvement Process Report CommitteeTechnology CommitteeTenure Committees (4)Faculty Search Committees 2 for
Holk (2013-2019)Curriculum CommitteeBSN TeamBSN Student/Faculty Governance KCHP/OC CommitteeDestination ImaginationCCNE-Continuous Improvement Process Report CommitteeEvaluation CommitteeTenure Committees (3) Wareham (2013-2019)Faculty Curriculum CouncilEvaluation Committee
2017-20182018-2019Minerva Holk, President of Sigma © chapter 2018-2019 Interim Associate Dean of Nursing
Allison Wareham, Sabbatical 2019-2020
15
nursing and 2 for other disciplinesTreasurer for Navy Nurse Corps Association
Curriculum Committee Doherty (2013-2019)Tenure Committees (3)Evaluation CommitteeCurriculum CommitteeBSN Team CommitteeCCNE-Continuous Improvement Process Report Committee Mulligan ((2013-2019)Distance Learning CommitteeBSN Student/Faculty GovernanceBSN Team CommitteeCurriculum Committee, chairCCNE-Continuous Improvement Process Report CommitteeTechnology Committee
16
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Nursing Faculty are academically and experientially qualified
Area of qualification:Scholarship
Definition: Scholarship in nursing is defined as those activities that systematically advance the teaching, and practice of nursing through rigorous inquiry that (1) is significant to the profession; (2) is creative; (3) can be documented; (4) can be replicated or elaborated; and (5) can be peer-reviewed through various methods (AACN Position Statement, 1999). Level of achievement: 100% of RN-BSN faculty will actively engage in scholarship activities: attend a national or local professional conference or obtain continuing education credits.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
The collective talents of the faculty reflect scholarship through teaching, application, and the integration and discovery of knowledge as defined by the governing organization within the nursing education unit.
Faculty
Human Resources
Professional Credit Evaluation Committee(PCEC)
Faculty Annually in spring
Faculty determine individual goals for each year, and activities to reach those goals.
Scholarship activities for each faculty member are reviewed during the tenure process, the faculty assessment cycle, and PCEC meetings.
100% of RN-BSN faculty are engaged in scholarly activities. Professional development funds are adequate.
Minerva Holk & Anne Mulligan are affiliate clinical faculty at UWT. Sabbatical of three faculty supported. 2016-2017: Two faculty Presentation at the American Association of the Colleges of Nursing Baccalaureate Education Conference Inclusion of Military Medics into a Veterans Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program2017-2018: Presentation at Sigma Theta Tau Region 1 Policy Education and Advocacy for Military Medics and Licensed Practical Nurses transitioning into an Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program 2018-2019 International Conference CCBA Development and Support of Veteran Military Medics and Licensed Practical Nurses
2014-2015Two faculty on sabbatical for doctoral research for two quarters. 2019-2020 One faculty supported for one quarter sabbatical for scholarly work.
Continue to promote scholarly activities among all faculty.2014-20152015-20162016-20172017-20182018-2019 Continue to promote scholarly activities among all faculty.Associate Dean continues on Advisory Board School of Nursing UWT.Varied membership in professional nursing organizations e.g., AACN, Sigma Theta Tau
2013-2014Associate Dean invited to Advisory Board School of Nursing UWT.
2018-2019Interim Associate Dean of Nursing invited to Advisory Board School of Nursing UWT.
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
17
Standard II
Faculty Professional Development Resources
Definition: Funds used to update faculty knowledge.
Level of achievement: At least one nursing faculty is funded to attend a national conference annually.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Professional Credit Evaluation Committee (PCEC)
PCEC meeting minutes
Vice President of Instruction
Dean for Workforce Development
PCEC
Annually Budget sheets reviewed for resources available to nursing faculty.
Professional development funds are adequate.
Documentation available in 5-year tenure review for full-time faculty.
Continue to encourage faculty to pursue professional development opportunities. National conference funds available and used annually. Attendance at local conferences is robust. Continue to pursue opportunities for Industry-based professional development
Professional - Technical
Workforce Development Office
Dean for Workforce Development
Instructional funds
$300 discretionary fund
Vice President Instruction
Industry-based professional development
Workforce Development Office
Dean for Workforce Development
Annually Budget sheets
18
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Faculty Utilization
Definitions
Faculty: Tenured and tenure-track academic employees. Level of achievement: 100% of full-time faculty teach 450 contact hours per year for the RN-BSN program. Instructor to student ratios will not exceed 1:12 in the fieldwork area or 1:35 in theory and for writing intensive courses 1:25.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Number and utilization of full-time and part-time faculty meet the needs of the nursing education unit to fulfill its purposes.
Schedule adjustment forms
Associate Dean of Nursing
Quarterly Quarterly assessment of needs and how needs were meet
100% of full-time faculty teach 450 contact hours per year.
Instructor-to-student ratios are below 1:35 in theory courses and are at or below 1:12 in Fieldwork courses.
Continue to search for full time faculty 2013-20142014-2015One new tenure track faculty2015-20162016-20172017-20182018-2019
Maintain current instructor-to-student ratios. Nursing Program Advisor/BSN Recruiter faculty position retained, new person hired for position
19
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard II
Faculty ProfessionalDevelopment Resources
Definition: Funds utilized to update faculty knowledge.
Level of achievement: All faculty have access to funds annually for professional development. At least one nursing faculty is funded to attend a national conference annually.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revisio
n
Professional Credit Evaluation Committee(PCEC)
PCEC meeting minutes
Vice President Instruction
Dean for Workforce Development
PCEC
Annually Budget sheets Professional development funds are adequate.
All faculty show evidence of professional development.
Documentation available in resource room.
2013-20142014-2015Minerva Holk, Sigma Theta Tau Leadership Conference2015-20162016-2017Sue Riddle, Anne Mulligan & Minerva Holk, AACN2017-2018Anne Mulligan & Minerva Holk, Sigma Theta Tau International Conference2018-2019
Carl Perkins GrantsVocational Funding
Workforce Development Office
Dean for Workforce Development
Instructional funds
$400 discretionary fund
Vice President Instruction
20
Industry-based professional development
Workforce Development Office
Dean for Workforce Development
Annually Budget sheets
21
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Supportive ServicesDefinition: Services that foster the development and achievement of individual students’ personal and education goals.
Level of achievement: 80% of in-program students will rate supportive services good to excellent.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Financial aid
Access services
Advising and counseling center
Career center
Multicultural center
Tutoring services
Safety and security
Child care services
Pre-RN-BSN advising
Writing center
Graduate survey
Mid-Point and End of Program Survey
Office of the Vice President of Student Services
Faculty
Nursing Program Advisor
Associate Dean of Nursing
Vice President of Student Services
Annually Annual student satisfaction surveys,
Graduate satisfaction surveys at one and three years
Midpoint2013-2014 all criteria met2014-2015 all criteria met2015-2016 all criteria met2016-2017 all criteria met2017-2018 all criteria met2018-2019 all criteria met End of program2013-2014 all criteria met2014-2015 all criteria met2015-2016 all criteria met2016-2017 all criteria met2017-2018 all criteria met2018-2019 all criteria met 1 Year Post survey comments2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met2018-2019 in process
Ongoing revision of survey master plan Ongoing pursuit of support for survey completion at Nursing Advisory Board meetings and in all work settings.
2014-20153-year post survey review discontinued due to low return rate. Survey modified for automated raw data analysis. 2016-2017
While criteria met, special support in financial aid for RN BSN students’ needs instituted.
22
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Educational and Financial RecordsLevel of achievement: 100% of RN-BSN faculty agree that policies are in place for financial and educational records and that they are followed by the institution.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Policies concerned with educational and financial records are established and followed by the institution or nursing education unit.
College policies and procedures
Dean of Registration and Records
Director of Admissions and Outreach
Associate Dean of Nursing
Faculty
Nursing Programs Advisor/BSN Recruiter
Whenever policies are established or changed
When new clerical personnel are in place
Compare policies to FERPA and NCQAC regulations and to what is being done for accuracy and congruence.
In program student files are locked and kept in the nursing programs Office2013-2014 met2014-2015 met2015-2016 met2016-2017 met2017-2018 met2018-2019 met
RN-BSN applications, program plans, and class schedules archived after graduation.
23
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
BudgetDefinition: RN-BSN budget provides funding for Office supplies, professional development, and equipment for the RN-BSN Program.
Level of achievement: Budget allocations are adequate to meet the RN-BSN Program needs.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
RN-BSN program budget
Nursing Program Administrative Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
Nursing Budget Representative
Quarterly and annually
Comparative analysis of budgets for other disciplines
Identification of needs of RN-BSN program and comparison with budget resources available
Level of achievement met. Adequate budget
2014-20152015-20162016-20172017-20182018-2019 Budget process is stable with state allocation of $6,300 per year per FTE. Other income from 45 upper division credits of student tuition.
2013-2014Received additional $37000 budget allocation.
2019-2020 House Bill 5158 Workforce Development Funds – Nurse Educator Salary and Retention 26.5% increase for nursing faculty in Community and Technical Colleges.
24
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard II
Computer/AV Technology to Support Nursing Program
Definition: Software, computer hardware, TVs, and VCRs used to support the Nursing Program.
Level of Achievement: (1) Computer hardware is replaced per IT recycle schedule and/or when unable to support software systems. (2) Computer technology and software are replaced when they no longer support current scientific knowledge and/or Fieldwork practice standards.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Faculty, staff, student computer software
Teaching station in each classroom:TV/VCR, DVD, ELMO, and computer in each classroom and specialized rooms have ITV capability
Distance learning, web-enhanced or hybrid in Canvas©
RN-BSN faculty meeting minutes
Nursing Program Office
IT Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
Faculty
Nursing Program Budget Representative
Information Technology (IT)
Annually and as needed
Instructional Technology department procedures
Software evaluated for in-program use by faculty expert in content area
Student satisfaction survey
Technology adequate to support nursing curriculum.
2018-2019 Initiated further discussion with Distance Learning council to move forward with development of hybrid courses in compliance with WAC.
2013-20142014-20152015-20162016-20172017-20182018-2019Faculty active member of college-wide distance learning council. Electronic portfolio development OngoingPERLA software updates done on nursing faculty computers.2018-2019 RN-BSN student continue to use technology-rich learning modality
2013-2014Discontinued pursuit of hybrid teaching-learning model in favor of a face to face program in compliance with current WAC. 2017-2018New campus building with a room used by RN-BSN students equipped with technology- rich active learning modalities.
25
classroom
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Physical Facilities Definition: Building that houses Nursing Program faculty and staff Offices, classrooms, labs, restroom, and educational records area.
Level of achievement: 80% of graduates, faculty, and staff will rate physical facilities good to excellent.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Classrooms
Faculty Offices
Program Assistant’s Office
Student study space
Bookstore
Restrooms
Food services
RN-BSN meeting minutes
Facility Committee meeting minutes
Vice President of Administrative Services, Olympic College Bremerton
Dean
Associate Dean of Nursing
Annually Qualitative interviews of faculty, staff, and students
Staff satisfaction survey annually.Student Satisfaction at mid-point2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met2018-2019 Met End of program2013-2014 all criteria met2014-2015 all criteria met2015-2016 all criteria met2016-2017 all criteria met2017-2018 all criteria met2018-2019 all criteria met 1 Year Post survey comments2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met
2013-20142014-20152015-20162016-2017All rooms use for RN-BSN courses are in a state of the art soundly constructed building.Student and faculty surveys indicate satisfaction. 2017-20182018-2019With use of two building, satisfaction surveys and remain good to excellent.
2017-2018One RN -BSN course moved to newly opened campus building with theater arts auditorium for student presentations and one technology rich course
One and three years after graduation
Graduate surveys
Annually in spring
Student satisfaction surveys
26
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard II
Library Media Center Definition: A place where books, periodicals, reference material, audiovisual materials, and online computerized indexes and databases are housed.
Level of achievement: Nursing holdings are replaced when they no longer support current scientific knowledge and/or Fieldwork practice standards. 80% of students will rate library resources good to excellent.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Books
Periodicals
AV material
Computer technology,
Nursing faculty meeting minutes
Nursing Program Office
Library Review Committee (RN-BSN Curriculum Committee and library faculty)
Annually and as needed
Review of current library holdings
Student and graduate satisfaction surveys
Library Media Center has strong holdings to support nursing curriculum. Classes taught at the Bremerton campus are close to main library
2017-2018 Library faculty developed an online module for literature search review for winter
All RN’s in the state of Washington have access to University of Washington Health Sciences Library.Continue review annually and as
2015-2016 Presentation practice room remodeled in library For
27
such as online library catalog databases
resources. Midpoint2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met2018-2019 Met End of program2013-2014 all criteria met2014-2015 all criteria met2015-2016 all criteria met2016-2017 all criteria met2017-2018 all criteria met2018-2019 all criteria met 1 Year Post survey comments2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met2018-2019 Met
BNURS 340. Students complete one literature search with librarian faculty.
needed. 24/7 “Ask a Librarian” services are available on-line. Library faculty participate in student orientation and in BNURS 350 and BNURS 340.
electronic database budget: 2013-2014: $27,698
2014-2015:$27,304
2015-2016: $31,927
2016-2017:$24,599
2017-2018: $30,149.
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard III
Nursing Curriculum Including teaching-learning practices
Definition: A cohesive, coherent plan of study developed by the nursing faculty that flows from the RN-BSN Program’s philosophy and conceptual framework. A logical progression of course outcomes designed to meet program/student outcomes that prepare graduates for positions requiring baccalaureate preparation.
Level of Achievement: At least 95% of RN-BSN faculty agree that the curriculum is a cohesive, coherent plan of study that prepares graduates for positions requiring a baccalaureate degree.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
RN-BSN curriculum
RN-BSN facultymeeting minutes
Curriculum Committee meeting
Faculty
Associate Dean of Nursing
RN-BSN
Quarterly and annually
Analysis of data (in-program student evaluation, graduate and employer survey data, advisory
All faculty agree that the curriculum prepares graduates for baccalaureate RN positions
2014-20151. BNURS450
Professional Development and Seminar I, added content related to group dynamics and peer review.
Continue to maintain connections between courses.
2016-2017
2013-2014:BNURS 412- Deleted textbook requirement, changed to current evidence-based articles on healthcare leadership theories, change theory, finance, and current issues in healthcare leadership.
28
minutes Curriculum Committee
board input, and quality of available Fieldwork experiences) to determine trends, strengths, and areas in need of improvement
RN-BSN curriculum reviewed quarterly and yearly.
Quarterly review by RN-BSN Curriculum Committee
Faculty course reviews
and is a cohesive, coherent plan of study.
Table 14 in the CIPR (2019) shows the general education distribution requirements for the RN-BSN curriculum.
2. Ethics faculty attend UW ethics conference and revision made to BNURS410 Ethics in Nursing.
3. BNURS411 and BNURS409 changes to organization of content related to community assessment.
4. BNURS 411 professional behaviors.
2017-2018:1. Created Fieldwork
Evaluation Form for direct measure of student learning by faculty.
2. Reviewed curricular threads related to genomics.
BNURS 4501. Developed format
for online portfolio creation in google sites.
2017-20182018-2019
Links between theory and fieldwork.
BNURS 411Professional Values/Role Development link to course outcomes identified and included in syllabus
2017-2018BNURS 450
Minor changes to formatting of electronic portfolio. Students provided PowerPoint with instructions
BNURS 340 Genomic content
moved from BNURS 340 to BNURS 402.
BNURS 408 Review leadership and
add Professional Values/Role Development.
BNURS 409 Fewer guest speakers Give class time for
group work. BNURS 411
Add Professional Values/Role Development to course outcome
Orientation to Fieldwork.
2018-2019:BNURS 408- Minor revision to Fieldwork Evaluation Form. BNURS 450- Changes to portfolio development due to changes in Google sites.
2019-2020: Revision to nomenclature from community to population health.
29
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard III
General Education Courses
Definition: Courses in the arts, sciences, and humanities provide a forum for the study of values, ethical principles, and the physical world as well as opportunities to reflect and to apply knowledge to professional practice. Level of achievement: At least 80% of graduates will rate general education courses good to excellent, in the following areas: content, relevance, sequencing, rigor, and student input.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
30
Foreign Language: 10 credits in one language May also be fulfilled with two years in high
school of a single foreign language. Students educated in another language through the eighth grade, can waive this requirement.
Mathematics Requirement fulfilled by advanced math or
statistics (with petition).
Quantitative/Symbolic Reasoning: 5 credits
Writing: 15 credits Must include 5 credits of English composition
and 10 additional credits of writing-intensive coursework.
Humanities: 15 credits College-level foreign language credits can be
applied toward this requirement and may be completed while in ADN or RN-BSN program.
Social Sciences: 15 credits May be completed in ADN and/or BSN
programs.
Natural Sciences: 28 credits Must include 5 credits of college-level
chemistry, 10 credits of anatomy and physiology (can be met via examination), 3 credits of microbiology (can be met via examination), 5 credits of advanced math (can be petitioned) and 5 credits of statistics.
Electives: 65 credits General education requirements
Nursing Program Office
Graduate surveys
Associate Dean of Nursing, in collaboration with RN-BSN nursing faculty and general education faculty
Annually in spring, one year post-graduation
Graduate survey
Pending. New electives created for upper division humanities and social sciences: 2018-2019Pathophysiology Advanced
Discussion regarding relevancy is ongoing. Students matriculating from other programs may skew data.
2018ENGL 328 changed from British Literature Advanced to Literature and Medicine
HUM 320 Changed from Women in America- Advanced to Women and Gender Studies-Advanced
31
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard III
Textbooks Definition: Books used to support the RN-BSN Program curriculum.
Level of Achievement: Textbooks are up-to-date and reflect, as appropriate, current professional nursing standards and evidence-based practice. RN-BSN Curriculum Committee will review and select textbooks for adoption.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Textbooks Annual textbook list
Nursing Program Office
Faculty
Annually Comparative analysis between content-specific texts regarding current nursing practice and student learning needs
RN-BSN textbooks are current and appropriate.
Considering books that meet the OER or cost less than $50.
Annual review of current texts 2013-2014
BNURS 412 Deleted textbook.
BNURS 430: new textbook selected.
2011-2012:BNURS 430 Communication book discontinued
BNURS 407: Select textbooks removed from requirementsBNURS 410 discontinued textbook; current articles
32
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard III
Program Design
Definition: Program design provides an opportunity for students to achieve program/student outcomes and acquire knowledge, skills, values, and competencies necessary for professional nursing practice.
Level of achievement: 100% of RN-BSN faculty agree that program design provides opportunity for students to achieve program/student outcomes and acquire knowledge, skills, values, and competencies necessary for professional nursing practice.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Program design provides an opportunity for students to achieve program/student outcomes and acquire knowledge, skills, values, and competencies necessary for professional nursing practice.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessments (SLOA)
RN-BSN faculty meeting minutes
RN-BSN Curriculum Committee meeting minutes
Faculty
Associate Dean of Nursing
Ongoing each quarter
Summarized yearly
Employer surveys
Student Learning Outcomes Assessments
Graduate surveys
Faculty discussion
Professional portfolio review midpoint and end of program student satisfaction surveys
Annual student satisfaction surveys
2018-2019 2017-20182016-2017
100% of faculty agree that program design provides opportunity for students to achieve program outcomes and acquire knowledge, skills, values, and competencies necessary for nursing practice.
2018-2019 2017-20182016-2017
Data from faculty, discussion, portfolio review and SLOA 100% reflect achievement of program outcomes.
2019-2020Investigating hybrid and distance learning course delivery for some BNURS courses.
Continue to assess program design on ongoing basis.
33
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard III
Fieldwork FacilityResources
Definition: Environment that allows RN-BSN students to meet program outcomes and role development in provider of care, manager of care, and member of the profession.
Level of achievement: 100% of faculty and 80% of students and graduates will rate fieldwork facilities good to excellent in providing fieldwork experiences that facilitate student achievement of program/student outcomes.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used for
Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
Fieldwork facility
RN-BSN faculty minutes
Graduate survey
In-program student evaluations of fieldwork sites
Nursing Program Office
Full-time faculty overseeing fieldwork courses
Quarterly and annually
Graduate survey one- and three-years’ post-graduation
Review of faculty minutes, fieldwork agency evaluation forms, and graduate surveys
Analysis of faculty, graduate, and student data to assess quality of fieldwork facilities
Qualitative evaluation of fieldwork site by faculty
Annual student satisfaction surveys
2018-2019 2017-20182016-2017
100% of faculty verbally report that the level of achievement is being met at this time.
2018-2019 2017-20182016-2017
100% of students report level of achievement is being met.
Fieldwork groups limited to no more than five students each.
Agency availability provided to students during fieldwork orientation. This allows informed decision making
Faculty have no more than three fieldwork sites/student groups, preferably two.
2016-20172017-20182018-2019Updated fieldwork preceptor handbook.
Fieldwork preceptor
Nursing Program Office
RN-BSN Fieldwork faculty
Completion of BNURS 408-411
Preceptor evaluation tool
34
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard III
Fieldwork Agency Contracts Definition: A legally binding contract between Olympic College and the health agency.
Level of Achievement: Contracts are signed and in place for all fieldwork experiences. Contracts meet current needs of RN-BSN program for educational experiences and conform to College legal requirements.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment Assessment Method Findings Used for
Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Fieldwork agency contracts
Fieldwork agency agreement notebook in the Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
Fieldwork Placement Liaison
College Procurement Officer
Legal Counsel when appropriate
Annuallyand as needed
Files reviewed for current contracts for all fieldwork agencies.
Fieldwork agency agreements reviewed to ascertain control of education and continuity of educational experience.
College legal representative reviews contracts when new content is proposed by agencies.
2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Current Health Agency Agreement is in place for each individual fieldwork facility.
2016-20172017-2018New fieldwork site added. Investigate additional fieldwork sites
Continue annual review
35
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard IV
Faculty Assessment Definition: The assessment process is qualitative and formative, and is designed to promote and encourage academic growth and development.
Level of achievement: All tenured, probationary, and adjunct faculty are assessed per the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA).
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program Improvement Development Maintenance Revision
Tenured CollectiveBargaining Agreement
Human Resources
Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
TenureCommittees
Every five years
Academic Employee Assessment Procedure is completed per faculty contract.
Level of achievement met.
2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met2018-2019 Met
All FT RN-BSN faculty are currently tenured.
Adjunct faculty are evaluated quarterly.
2018-2019 – Dr. Anne Mulligan successfully completed 5-year review.
Probationary Quarterly
Adjunct Quarterly
Faculty job description
CollectiveBargaining Agreement
OC Associationfor Higher Education (OCAHE)
CBA is renegotiated every four years.
Negotiated via collective bargaining.
Faculty hiring committees write specific job descriptions for each discipline.
Level of achievement met.
2013-2014 Met2014-2015 Met2015-2016 Met2016-2017 Met2017-2018 Met2018-2019 Met
Job description is stable.
36
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard IV
Program Satisfaction(Employer)
Definition: The perceived level of approval of the RN-BSN Program by the employers of graduates. Employers’ approval of graduates’ functioning in the role of a professional, baccalaureate-prepared nurse.
Level of achievement: 80% of employers will rate that the graduate has acquired knowledge, skills, and values necessary for baccalaureate nursing practice.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Employers of graduate
Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
One year after graduation
Qualitative;Employer Satisfaction Survey at one-year post gradQ 30
2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
2014-2015Three-year post grad employer survey discontinued.
37
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLANStandard IV
Program Satisfaction
GraduatesIn-program students
Definition: Graduates’ perceived level of approval of the RN-BSN Program, including the educational environment, the curriculum, policies, learning resources, professional preparation, and facilitation of personal development. Included data on certifications, employment, and program/student outcomes.
Level of achievement: At least 80% of graduates will rate program satisfaction good to excellent.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
RN-BSN graduates
Certification rates
Employment rates
Program/student outcomes
Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
RN-BSN faculty
End of program and one year after graduation
End of Program, Graduation surveys
Rationale: Data are analyzed to determine actual program satisfaction compared to expected level of achievement. Results are used to identify strengths and areas for improvement for program and/or tools.
.
Student satisfaction
Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
RN-BSN faculty
Annually in spring
Student satisfactionQ 21Q 1.21
2013-20142014-20152015-20162016-20172017-20182018-2019
Final RN-BSN student satisfaction survey met for all areas.
2017-2018 Turned survey data over to ISS resulting in numbering changes
38
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Graduate Survey Definition: Nursing roles requiring advanced nursing education beyond the basic baccalaureate preparation. Academic preparation for advanced nursing may occur at the master’s and/or doctoral level.
Level of achievement: At least 20% of graduates plan to enroll in graduate study within three years of graduation.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopme
nt Maintenance Revision
Enrolled in graduate program
Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
One year after graduation
One-year post graduation survey Q 27Q 2.31
2013-2014 58.33%2014-2015 55.56%2015-2016 50% 2016-2017 0%2017-2018 62.5%2018-2019 100%
2017-2018 Turned survey data over to ISS resulting in numbering changes
Ongoing discussion with UW/T graduate program and employers/nursing advisory committee
Added “communication with faculty” as a strategy to capture graduates continuing with graduate studies.
39
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Promotion/Job change Definition: Number of graduates employed in a position or reporting an increase in job responsibilities, for which the program prepared them, within one to three years post-graduation.
Level of achievement: At least 30% of graduates will report a change in job description or increased in responsibilities.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Promotion
Job change
Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
One year after graduation
One-year post graduation surveyQ 26Q 2.29
2013-2014 50%2014-2015 67%2015-2016 50%2016-2017 50%2017-2018 67%2018-2019 100%
40
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Employment Definition: Working as a registered nurse.
Level of achievement: 100% of RN-BSN graduates who seek employment are employed as registered nurses.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of Assessment
Assessment Method
Findings Used for Program
ImprovementDevelopment Maintenance Revision
Employment Nursing Program Office
Associate Dean of Nursing
One year after graduation
One-year post graduate surveyQ 22Q 2.22
2013-2014 100%2014-2015 88.892015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
41
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Graduation Rates
Definition: A student will graduate within four years of taking the first BNURS course.
Level of achievement: 75% of students will graduate within four years of taking the first BNURS course.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used
for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
Program statistics
RN-BSN statistics Office of the RN-BSN Advisor/ Recruiter
Quarterly and yearly
Review of enrollments, withdrawals, and progression
(Adjusted)2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%
42
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Program/Student Expected Outcome
Leadership
Definition: Leadership (Manager of Care, Member of the Profession)The graduate will apply leadership skills as evidenced by: • Providing, coordinating, designing and evaluating client care in a variety
of settings. (Synthesis, Evaluation)• Advocating quality health care for individuals, families, groups and
communities through understanding health care delivery systems, as shaped by public health policies and societal issues. (Application, Synthesis)
• Developing policies and strategies to promote cost-effective, quality care for health and wellness. (Synthesis)
• Generating communication, collaboration, negotiation, delegation, coordination and evaluation of interdisciplinary teams. (Synthesis, Evaluation)
• Fostering readiness in others to alter responses and actions in professional practice. (Evaluation)
Level of achievement: 1.80% of respondents on graduate survey; student satisfaction survey, and
employer survey will rate achievement of leadership competencies good to excellent.
2.100% of student portfolio reflections on leadership will document achievement of the leadership program/student expected outcome.
3.80% of students will state BNURS 412 (SLOA) helped them develop or achieve the student expected outcome of leadership.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used for
Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
1. Student satisfaction survey RN-BSN
Curriculum Team Committee
Yearly at RN-BSN team meeting
Aggregate data analysis of: Student
satisfaction survey
Graduate Survey
Employer survey
SLOA Portfolio
Student satisfaction survey2013-2014 96%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 98%2016-2017 94%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
On-going direct measure rubric used to document student achievement of Leadership outcomes at end of program as evidenced at community health presentations.
2. Graduate survey Graduate survey2013-2014 95%2014-2015 98%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 98%2017-2018 95%2018-2019 100%
3. Employer survey Employer survey2013-2014 91%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 92%2017-2018 100%
43
2018-2019 100%4. Student Learning
Outcome Assessment (SLOA)
SLOA BNURS 4122013-2014 100%2014-2015 94%2015-2016 86%2016-2017 96%2017-2018 93%2018-2019 86%
5. Portfolio Portfolio2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
44
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Program/Student Expected Outcome
Analytic Reasoning
Definition: Analytic Reasoning (Provider of Care, Manager of Care)The graduate will utilize and apply analytical reasoning in professional practice as evidenced by:• Integrating research and scholarship modalities in the nursing process
for the care of individuals, families, groups and communities. (Synthesis)• Synthesizing information, questioning discrepancies and inconsistencies
to enhance care and promote health. (Synthesis, Evaluation)• Recognizing assumptions regarding clinical practice, research and
theory in challenging habitual approaches to thinking and acting. (Application)
• Utilize insight, creative analysis and reasoning for critical thinking in all aspects of professional practice. (Synthesis, Evaluation)
• Critiquing research findings to determine applicability and appropriateness in theory-based practice. (Evaluation)
• Applying epidemiology, clinical research, outcomes research, social science and health systems information in identifying efficient, evidence-based quality approaches to care. (Application)
Level of achievement: 1. 80% of respondents on graduate survey, student satisfaction, and
employer survey will rate achievement of analytic reasoning competencies good to excellent.
2. 80% of students will state BNURSE 340, 350, 403 helped them develop or achieve the program/student expected outcome of analytic reasoning.
3. 100% of student portfolio reflections on analytic reasoning will document achievement of the analytic reasoning program/student expected outcome.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used
for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
1. Student satisfaction survey RN-BSN
Curriculum Team Committee
Yearly at RN-BSN team meeting
Aggregate data analysis of: Student
satisfaction survey
Graduate Survey
Employer survey
SLOA Portfolio
Student satisfaction survey2013-2014 97%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 99%2016-2017 81%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 99%
On-going direct measure rubric used to document student achievement of Analytic Reasoning outcomes at end of program as evidenced at community health presentations.
2. Graduate survey Graduate survey2013-2014 99%2014-2015 98%2015-2016 90%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 92%2018-2019 100%
3. Employer survey Employer survey2013-2014 94%
45
2014-2015 96%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
4. Student Learning Outcome Assessment (SLOA)
SLOA BNURS 340, 2013-2014 86%2014-2015 82%2015-2016 95%2016-2017 86%2017-2018 95%2018-2019 88%BNURS 350, 2013-2014 75%2014-2015 90%2015-2016 89%2016-2017 87%2017-2018 81%2018-2019 100%BNURS 4032013-2014 78%2014-2015 ND2015-2016 94.3%2016-2017 91%2017-2018 85%2018-2019 ND
5. Portfolio Portfolio2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
46
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Program/Student Expected Outcome
Community, Health and Wellness
Definition: Community, Health and Wellness (Manager of Care, Provider of Care) The graduate will promote health and wellness in the community as evidenced by:• Assessment of global environmental factors that impact the health status of individuals, families, groups and communities. (Comprehension)
• Implementing nursing care that is directed toward creating, modifying and enhancing environments to promote optimal health. (Evaluation)
• Assisting individuals, families, groups and communities to incorporate attitudes and behaviors that maintain wellness within the cultural frameworks in which they make decisions. (Synthesis)
Level of achievement: 1. 80% of respondents on graduate survey, student satisfaction, and
employer survey will rate achievement of Community, Health and Wellness competencies good to excellent.
2. 80% of students will state BNURSE 402, 408, 409, 411 helped them develop or achieve the program/student expected outcome of Community, Health and Wellness.
3. 100% of student portfolio reflections on Community, Health and Wellness will document achievement of the Community, Health and Wellness program/student expected outcome.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used
for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
1. Student satisfaction survey RN-BSN
Curriculum Team Committee
Yearly at RN-BSN team meeting
Aggregate data analysis of: Student
satisfaction survey
Graduate Survey
Employer survey
SLOA Portfolio
Student satisfaction survey2013-2014 97%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 96%2016-2017 50%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
On-going direct measure rubric used to document student achievement of Community, Health and Wellness outcomes at end of program as evidenced at community health presentations.
2. Graduate survey Graduate survey2013-2014 97%2014-2015 99%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 88%2018-2019 100%
3. Employer survey Employer survey2013-2014 96%2014-2015 87%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
4. Student Learning Outcome Assessment
SLOA BNURS 402,
47
(SLOA) 2013-2014 60%2014-2015 70%2015-2016 83%2016-2017 96%2017-2018 92%2018-2019 75%BNURS 408, 2013-2014 82%2014-2015 73%2015-2016 89%2016-2017 90%2017-2018 95%2018-2019 100%BNURS 409, 2013-2014 96%2014-2015 90%2015-2016 96%2016-2017 96%2017-2018 85%2018-2019 89%BNURS 4112013-2014 89%2014-2015 85%2015-2016 85%2016-2017 96%2017-2018 93%2018-2019 75%
5. Portfolio Portfolio2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
48
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Program/Student Expected Outcome
Professional Values/Role Development
Definition: Professional Values/Role Development (Member of the Profession) The graduate will demonstrate professional values as evidenced by:• Integrating caring behaviors encompassing empathy, listening,
genuineness, warmth, sensitivity and respect for human dignity in professional nursing practice. (Synthesis)
• Demonstrating professional role behaviors including autonomy, altruism, integrity, social justice, ethical principles and self-regulation. (Application)
• Applying the theoretical body of knowledge specified in the Washington State Nurse Practice Act, the ANA: Standards of Clinical Practice, Code of Ethics and Social Policy Statement. (Application)
• Demonstrating accountability for one’s own practice. (Application)• Engaging in ongoing independent, self-directed, life-long learning.
(Synthesis)• Increasing public awareness regarding the roles and values of the
Professional Nurse as they relate to health care. (Synthesis)• Participating in professional nursing activities. (Application)Level of achievement: 1. 80% of respondents on graduate survey, student satisfaction, and
employer survey will rate achievement of Professional Values/Role Development competencies good to excellent.
2. 80% of students will state BNURSE 407, 410, 430, 450, 451 helped them develop or achieve the program/student expected outcome of Professional Values/Role Development.
3. 100% of student portfolio reflections on Professional Values/Role Development will document achievement of the Professional Values/Role Development program/student expected outcome.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used
for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
1. Student satisfaction survey RN-BSN
Curriculum Team Committee
Yearly at RN-BSN team meeting
Aggregate data analysis of: Student
satisfaction survey
Graduate Survey
Employer survey
SLOA Portfolio
Student satisfaction survey2013-2014 97%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 94%2016-2017 97%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
On-going direct measure rubric used to document student achievement of Professional Values/Role Development outcomes at end of program as evidenced at community health presentations.
2. Graduate survey Graduate survey2013-2014 96%2014-2015 97%2015-2016 96%2016-2017 98%2017-2018 98%2018-2019 100%
3. Employer survey Employer survey2013-2014 97%
49
2014-2015 98%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2018-2019 100%
4. Student Learning Outcome Assessment (SLOA)
SLOA BNURS 407,2013-2014 81%2014-2015 81%2015-2016 80%2016-2017 82%2017-2018 73%2018-2019 77%BNURS 410,2013-2014 100%2014-2015 85%2015-2016 84%2016-2017 77%2017-2018 72%2018-2019 94%BNURS 430,2013-2014 77%2014-2015 76%2015-2016 96%2016-2017 82%2017-2018 67%2018-2019 81%BNURS 450,2013-2014 100%2014-2015 63%2015-2016 73%2016-2017 68%2017-2018 75%2018-2019 81%BNURS 4512013-2014 97%2014-2015 85%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 93%2017-2018 92%2018-2019 100%
5. Portfolio Portfolio2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
50
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Program/Student Expected Outcome
Scholarly Inquiry
Definition: Scholarly Inquiry (Member of the Profession, Manager of Care, Provider of Care) The graduate will demonstrate scholarly inquiry as evidenced by:• Using nursing theorists, models and ethical frameworks to make clinical
decisions. (Evaluation)• Independent and collaborative decision making, clinical judgment and
creative problem solving. (Synthesis, Evaluation)• Critiquing, applying and promoting use of evidence-based findings in
practice to reduce risk and maintain or restore the health of clients. (Evaluation)
• Planning, implementing and evaluating care of individuals, families, groups and communities. (Synthesis, Evaluation)
Level of achievement: 1. 80% of respondents on graduate survey, student satisfaction, and
employer survey will rate achievement of Scholarly Inquiry competencies good to excellent.
2. 80% of students will state BNURSE 340, 403, 411 helped them develop or achieve the program/student expected outcome Scholarly Inquiry.
3. 100% of student portfolio reflections on Scholarly Inquiry will document achievement of Scholarly Inquiry program/student expected outcome.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used
for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
1. Student satisfaction survey RN-BSN
Curriculum Team Committee
Yearly at RN-BSN team meeting
Aggregate data analysis of: Student
satisfaction survey
Graduate Survey
Employer survey
SLOA Portfolio
Student satisfaction survey2013-2014 96%2014-2015 97%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 99%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
On-going direct measure rubric used to document student achievement of Scholarly Inquiry outcomes at end of program as evidenced at community health presentations
2. Graduate survey Graduate survey2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 97%
3. Employer survey Employer survey2013-2014 94%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
4. Student Learning Outcome Assessment
SLOA BNURS 340
51
(SLOA) 2013-2014 77%2014-2015 68%2015-2016 81%2016-2017 86%2017-2018 80%2018-2019 88%
BNURS 403, 2013-2014 82%2014-2015 ND2015-2016 91%2016-2017 91%2017-2018 95%2018-2019 ND
BNURS 4112013-2014 63%2014-2015 71%2015-2016 70%2016-2017 79%2017-2018 68%2018-2019 65%
5. Portfolio Portfolio2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
52
SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
Standard IV
Program/Student Expected Outcome
Communication
Definition: Communication (Member of the Profession, Manager of Care, Provider of Care) The graduate will demonstrate effective communication; an ongoing and dynamic process, as evidenced by:• Effectively communicating in many forms (e.g. verbal, nonverbal, written
and technological) with individuals, families, groups, communities and members of the health care team. (Application)
• Addressing the health needs of individuals, families, groups and communities through exploring, defining and clarifying data. (Evaluation)
• Providing teaching and emotional support to individuals, families, groups, communities and health care team members. (Evaluation)
• Assisting clients to interpret the meaning and validity of health care information. (Evaluation).
Level of achievement: 1. 80% of respondents on graduate survey, student satisfaction, and
employer survey will rate achievement of Communication competencies good to excellent.
2. 80% of students will state BNURSE 350, 402, 407, 412, 430, 450, 451 helped them develop or achieve the program/student expected outcome Communication.
3. 100% of student portfolio reflections on Communication will document achievement of Communication program/student expected outcome.
Strategies that have been or will be used to address the area(s) identified as needing improvement
Component Documentation Person Responsible
Frequency of
AssessmentAssessment
MethodFindings Used
for Program Improvement
Development Maintenance Revision
1. Student satisfaction survey RN-BSN
Curriculum Team Committee
Yearly at RN-BSN team meeting
Aggregate data analysis of: Student
satisfaction survey
Graduate Survey
Employer survey
SLOA Portfolio
Student satisfaction survey2013-2014 96%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 99%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
On-going direct measure rubric used to document student achievement of Communication outcomes at end of program as evidenced at community health presentations.
2. Graduate survey Graduate survey2013-2014 98%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
3. Employer survey Employer survey2013-2014 94%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 100%
4. Student Learning SLOA
53
Outcome Assessment (SLOA)
BNURS 350, 2013-2014 75%2014-2015 68%2015-2016 89%2016-2017 70%2017-2018 76%2018-2019 86%BNURS 407, 2013-2014 85%2014-2015 81%2015-2016 86%2016-2017 68%2017-2018 86%2018-2019 100%BNURS 412, 2013-2014 93%2014-2015 80%2015-2016 86%2016-2017 89%2017-2018 69%2018-2019 87%BNURS 430, 2013-2014 93%2014-2015 90%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 91%2017-2018 100%2018-2019 94%BNURS 450, 2013-2014 100%2014-2015 71%2015-2016 78%2016-2017 59%2017-2018 60%2018-2019 88%BNURS 4512013-2014 85%2014-2015 70%2015-2016 93%2016-2017 100%2017-2018 92%2018-2019 88%
5. Portfolio Portfolio2013-2014 100%2014-2015 100%2015-2016 100%2016-2017 100%2018-2019 100%
54