standard 6 & 8
TRANSCRIPT
Paul MarshallPD Lead Consultant
Region [email protected]
EVAAS PDRegion 5 September 19th
Region 7 October 10th
SBE Policy on Standard 6
• The Department of Public Instruction will complete the sixth and eighth standard ratings after the results of the 2011 – 2012 testing program have been finalized and approved by the State Board of Education, and the EVAAS value-added scores have been calculated. This population should take place in late September 2012.
Evaluation Tools
Standards 1-5
Some Assessments to Measure Growth
Standard 8 Standards 1-7
End of GradeEnd of Course
VoCATs
Standard 6
End of GradeEnd of Course
VoCATs
From the MET…
Observation Tools
Assessments to Measure Growth
Student Survey
ExploringPilot in 47 LEAs
in 2011-12
What We Have
Standards 6 & 8 – The Basics
Teachers
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
Principals (and other Administrators)
1 65432 7 8Strategic Leadership
InstructionalLeadership
Cultural Leadership
Human Resource
Leadership
ManagerialLeadership
External Development
Leadership
Micro-political
Leadership
Academic Achievement
Leadership
04/13/23 • page 5
Growth Model
Teachers
Principals
6Contribute to Academic
Success
Academic Achievement
Leadership8Academic Achievement
Leadership
Standard 6 and 8 are measures of
Growth
04/13/23 • page 6
Proficiency vs Growth
Scenario Proficient Growth
5th grader begins the year reading at a 1st grade level. Ends the year reading at a 4th grade level.
5th grader begins the year reading at a 7th grade level. Ends the year reading at the 7th grade level.
NO
NO
YES
YES
Growth Model
Teachers
Principals
6Contribute to Academic
Success
Academic Achievement
Leadership8Academic Achievement
Leadership
We will use
Educator Value-Added Assessment System
EVAAS
for standards 6 & 8 when possible
04/13/23 • page 8
Growth Model
Teachers
Principals
6Contribute to Academic
Success
Academic Achievement
Leadership8Academic Achievement
Leadership
How do Value-Added models work?
•They measure growth by predicting how well a student will do on an assessment.
How do they predict how well the student will do?
•They look at previous test scores and estimate how well the student should do at the end of the year. Every student must grow based on where they start.
04/13/23 • page 9
Ratings
Teachers
Principals
6Contribute to Academic
Success
Academic Achievement
Leadership8Academic Achievement
Leadership
How will the ratings on Standards 6 & 8 work?
04/13/23 • page 10
Teacher Ratings Categories
Teachers
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
5 Rating CategoriesNot Demonstrated
Developing
Proficient
Accomplished
Distinguished
3 Rating CategoriesDoes Not Meet Expected Growth
Meets Expected Growth
Exceeds Expected Growth
04/13/23 • page 12
Teacher Ratings in 2011-12Rationale - MET Research - Standard 6 & 8 - Status - Support
▲
School-wide
EVAAS Growth
Teacher EVAAS Growth
70% 30%Weighted Average
Yearly Rating•Does not Meet Expected Growth
•Meets Expected Growth
•Exceeds Expected Growth
Why is school-wide EVAAS growth included?
• To encourage collaboration and collective ownership of overall outcomes.
Note: In 2011-12, teachers without individual EVAAS growth will have school-wide growth for Standard 6.
6
Teacher Ratings in 2011-12
Yearly Rating•Does not Meet Expected Growth
•Meets Expected Growth
•Exceeds Expected Growth
Sixth standard ratings available in two locations:
1.Rating only will be back-populated into the McREL tool and available to see on the 2011 – 2012 summary rating forms
2.Rating and component data available in EVAAS
6 Teacher-level EVAAS reports available on September 11 (estimated)
Teacher sixth standard ratings available at end of September
Teacher Ratings in 2012-13
School-wideEVAAS Growth
Teacher EVAAS Growth
Weighted Average
Yearly Rating•Does not Expected Growth
•Meets Expected Growth
•Exceeds Expected Growth
6Student Surveys
(?)
2012 – 2013 is the first year of data for all teachers and school administrators who have their own data
Possible additional element
04/13/23 • page 16
Principal Ratings
• Standards 8 rating will be determined using school-wide EVAAS growth
School-wideEVAAS Growth
Yearly Rating•Does not Meet Expectations
•Meets Expected Growth
•Exceeds Expected Growth
8
04/13/23 • page 17
Ratings
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
1 65432 7 8Strategic Leadership
InstructionalLeadership
Cultural Leadership
Human Resource
Leadership
ManagerialLeadership
External Development
Leadership
Micro-political
Leadership
Academic Achievement
Leadership
Teachers
Principals
Key Note on Ratings•Every educator is evaluated every year
•Each standard and rating stands on its own (1 out of 6, not 1/6)
•Ratings are used to create professional development plans each year
•Ratings are used to determine status
Status
What is the difference between Ratings and Status?
04/13/23 • page 20
Status
Ratings Status• Teachers
6 separate ratings to help teachers grow each year
• Principals8 separate ratings to help principals grow each year
• A single overall status that is determined once a principal or teacher has three years of growth data to populate 6 or 8
• Categories for Status1. In Need of Improvement
2. Effective
3. Highly Effective
04/13/23 • page 21
Status and Standard 6 & 8
• An educator receives an effectiveness status only once they have 3 years of data on Standard 6 or 8
• A 3-year rolling average of growth data from standard 6 or 8 is used as part of determining overall status
04/13/23 • page 22
3-Year Rolling Average
6 6 Contribute to Academic
Success
Contribute to Academic
Success61.9 + -2.5 + 1.2
1.9Met Expected Growth
-2.5Did not meet Expected Growth
1.2Met Expected Growth
Rating from 2012 - 2013
Rating from 2013 - 2014
Rating from 2014 - 2015
Standard Standard Standard
3
= .2 Met Expected Growth
3- year average rating on standard 6 for
determining status
Note: A similar methodology applies to principals as well.Note: The values above represent values from the MRM model in EVAAS.
04/13/23 • page 23
Three Years of Data
04/13/23 • page 24
Any three years of data attributable to a teacher or principal will be combined and used:
•Any grades•Any subjects•Any schools•Any districts
The three years of data do not start until they are specific to that teacher and his or her students
Status
So once a educator has a three-year average rating for Standard 6 or 8, how is status determined?
04/13/23 • page 25
Status
• The Three Status Categories are
1. In Need of Improvement
2. Effective
3. Highly Effective
04/13/23 • page 26
Teacher Status
In Need of Improvement Effective Highly
Effective
Standards 1-5In the year
Standard 6Three-year rolling average
6 6 62 years ago
1 year ago
Thisyear+ + /3)
)
1 5432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Any rating lower than proficient
And/Or
Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
Proficient or Higher
on Standards1-5
And
Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth
Accomplished
or Higher on
Standards1-5
And
Exceeds Expected Growth
What Will Teachers See?
• Ratings on Standards 1 – 5 of the Educator Evaluation System (as recorded in online tool)
• Standard 6 rating (current year and 2 prior years)
• Three-year rolling average of student growth values and accompanying Standard 6 rating(for Status determination)
• Overall Effectiveness Status
04/13/23 • page 29
Detail on the Sixth Standard Rating
What questions do you have??