stakeholder perspectives in a cookstove implementation project in rural mexico karin troncoso,...
Post on 18-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Stakeholder perspectives in a cookstove implementation
project in rural Mexico
Karin Troncoso, Alicia Castillo Leticia Merino and Elena Lazos
National University of Mexico (UNAM)
• In Mexico 25 million people use fuelwood in open fires mainly for cooking
• The use of fuelwood has negative health and environmental impacts
• Since the 70’s, a technology that addresses these 2 problems has been developed: The Improved Cookstove
• The interest for ICS came first from governments and environmental organizations that became concerned about the possible link between fuelwood harvesting and deforestation
• Exposure to smoke was later identified as a serious health problem, especially for women and small children
• Therefore, the designs of improved cookstoves have been driven mainly by the perceptions of external stakeholders, and actual people’s perceptions have played a minor role.
• The adoption of improved cookstoves has been limited, due to several factors:– Problems with the technologies– Problems with the diffusion methodology– Cultural aspects
Case study
• The implementation program carried out by GIRA, a local NGO
Project location:
Purépecha Region
19 municipalities220,000 fuelwood users
30 communities
1,500 ICS built
Improvement of life quality in rural homes
through the sustainable use of fuelwood in the
Purépecha RegionHealthstudy
Indoor air pollution
study Efficiencystudy
Diffusion,construction,
follow up
giragrupo interdisciplinario
de tecnología ruralapropiada
Greenhouse gas emissions
study
Social perceptions
study
Patsari cookstove
Technology:
Research questions
• How was the strategy followed by the NGO in this implementation project?
• How was the relation between the different stakeholders of the implementation project?
• What are the constraints faced by these projects?
Research methodology
• A qualitative research methodology was followed, which explains actions from the stakeholders’ perspectives
• Interviews were made to:– Researchers– Students– Development worker– Stove builders– NGO team– Technicians– Users
Results
Diffusion strategy
• The project followed an adaptative management strategy, giving place to three different ICS models
• The diffusion focused on women
• There was a follow up of the ICS
• In the first stage women had to pay 30% of the value. The second and third models were given for free as a reward for women’s participation in the studies
Relations between stakeholders
• Managing the relation between the studies and the implementation was a complex issue:– Lack of joint planning– Lack of a shared vision– Lack of communication– Lack of clarity with regards to the NGO’s
support to the study teams
Relation between the project and the users
• Many women got tired of the studies; they were not explained the extent of their involvement
• The diffusion of three different models caused problems
• Women were aware about the health problems and low efficiency addressed by ICS
• Women who adopted an ICS were in general satisfied
• Women did not know who had built their ICS
Stakeholder visions
• Two different visions on the approach to be followed by implementation projects were observed: A people-centered vision, and a technology-centered vision
Technology-centered vision
People-centered vision
Project
Focus on technology improvements as a way to ensure better adoption rates Diffusion by replicable technology kits It is unfeasible to offer a comprehensive follow-up
The adoption is a process and takes time The project requires involvement with the user’s situation A participatory work would have enabled a better performance of the teams and a better project outcome
User The user is responsible for the use she makes of the technology
The users are not aware of the need to change their cooking habits The implementer shares responsibility in the adoption
Technology-centered vision
People-centered vision
Strengths
Less expensive diffusion process Faster process The project can cover more communities
Favors the participation and considers the specific needs of every user
Weaknesses
Users are usually unaware of the need to change their cooking habits Without a project the NGO ability to obtain resources for the ICS is lost
Slow and expensive process
Project constraints• The diffusion program was constrained by the
NGO’s commitment with the donors• Technology requires external supplies• The studies took the NGO out of their diffusion
scheme • The studies involved a number of problems
regarding their approach with the users• Low adoption rates involved problems for the
studies• The NGO needs to decide which of the two
visions better represent its objectives
Thank you