stable stems and the chow-novikov t-structure in motivic stable … · 2020. 5. 5. · d2e3 m p3il...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Stable stems and the Chow-Novikov t-structurein motivic stable homotopy category
Zhouli Xu
MIT
May 4, 2020
-
The Classical Adams Spectral Sequence
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 480
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
The classical Adams spectral sequence
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
h0 h1 h2 h3
c0
Ph1 Ph2
h23
d0
h4
Pc0
e0
P2h1
f0
c1
P2h2
g
Pd0
h4c0
i
P2c0
Pe0
P3h1
j
P3h2
d20
k
h24
∆h22
P2d0
h5
n
d0e0+h70h5
d1
∆h1h3
l
P3c0
p
P2e0
P4h1
e20
Pj
m
P4h2
t
Pd20
x
e0g
d0i
h3h5
e1
∆h23
P3d0
h5c0
∆h1d0
Pd0e0
P2i
f1
Ph1h5
g2
d0j
P4c0
c2
∆h20e0
P3e0
P5h1
Ph2h5
∆h1e0
d30
P2j
d0k
P5h2
g2
∆h22d0
P2d20
h23h5
h5d0
∆h1g
d20e0
Pd0i
Mh1
∆h2c1
d0l
i2
P4d0
Ph5c0
∆h22e0
∆h20iP∆h1d0
P2d0e0
h3c2
h5e0
Mh2
d0e20
Pd0j
P5c0
h5f0
d0m
ij
P4e0
P6h1
h5c1
C
∆h22g
P∆h1e0
Pd30
P3j
h3g2
gn
d0e0g
d20i
P6h2
D1
d1g
e0m
P∆h22d0
P3d20
Ph5d0
MP
∆h1d20
Pd20e0
P2d0i
G
h5i
∆2h22
e20g
d20j+P∆c0d0
P5d0
gm
il
P2∆h1d0
P3d0e0
P4i
Ph5e0
gt∆2h1h3
∆h1d0e0
d40
P2d0j
P6c0
Q2
h5j
e0g2
Pd0m
Pij
P5e0
P7h1
D2
∆h22d20
P2∆h1e0
P2d30
P4j
Md0
∆h1e20
d30e0
Pd20i
P7h2
Mh4
B4
g3
d20l
d0i2
P4d20
D3
A′A+A′
∆x
∆h22n
jm
P∆h1d20
P2d20e0
P3d0i
h25
H1
h5n
∆e1
∆e1+C0
Me0∆2h23
∆h1e0g
MP2h1
d20e20
Pd20j+P2∆c0d0
P2i2
P6d0
h6
C′ X2
d20m
d0ij
P3∆h1d0
P4d0e0
A′′
h3Q2
∆2h1h4
∆h22d0g
∆2h21d0
P∆h1d0e0
Pd40
P3d0j
P7c0
h3D2
Mg
Ph5j
∆h22m
∆2h0e0
d0e30
P2d0m
P2ij
P6e0
P8h1
∆1h23
G0
B5
B5 + D′2
nm
d0e0m
P∆h22d20
P3∆h1e0
P3d30
P5j
n1Q3
X3 C′′
∆2c1
lm MPd0
∆h1d30
Pd30e0
P2d20i
P8h2
d2
h3A′
∆g2
∆2h0g
e40
d30j
Pd0i2
P5d20
p′
h3H1
D′3+?h2G0
P (A+A′)
∆2h1g
d0gm
∆h20d20e0
MP3
P2∆h1d20
P3d20e0
P4d0i
h3h6
p1+h20h3h6
d1e1
MPe0
m2+∆2h21g
∆h1d20e0
P∆2h0d0
d50
P2d20j+P3∆c0d0
P7d0
h6c0
x71,6
d0Q2
∆2h4c0
∆2h2g
Mj
g2n
e30g
d30k
P2il
P4∆h1d0
P5d0e0
P6i
Ph1h6
h23D2
h4Q2+h23D2
d0D2
e0gm
d0im
P∆2h21d0
P2∆h1d0e0
P2d40
P4d0j
P8c0
h4D2
Md20
P∆2h0e0 ∆h1d0e20
d40e0
P2d20k
P3ij
P7e0
P9h1
h3n1Ph2h6
x74,8
d0B4
e20g2
d30l
P2im
P4∆h1e0
P4d30
P6j
h3d2
x75,7
Mh24
∆h3g2
g2m
d0jm
MP2d0
P∆h1d30
P2d30e0
P3d20i
P9h2
h4D3
x76,6
h23H1
x76,9
Md0e0
g2t
∆2d20
∆h1e30
MPi+∆2h0d20
d30e20
P2d20l
P3ik
P6d20
h23h6
h6d0
x77,7m1
x77,8
gQ2
M∆h1h3
e0B4
∆2h0ke0g
3
d30m
P2jm
P3∆h1d20
P4d20e0
P5d0i
h4h6
t1
x78,9
x78,10
e0A′
MP2e0
d0km
P∆h1d20e0
MP4h1
Pd50
P3d20j
P4i2
P8d0
x1
Ph6c0
∆2n
Me20
∆2d0e0
MPj+∆2h0d0e0
∆h1e20g
d20e30
P2d20m
P3il
P4∆h20i P5∆h1d0
P6d0e0
e2
h6e0
P2h1h6
∆2d1
gB4
∆3h1h3
∆2h0lg4
d20e0m
P2km
P2∆2h21d0
P3∆h1d0e0
P3d40
P5d0j
P9c0
h6f0
c1H1
h3x74,8
gA′
∆2p
∆h22gn
MPd20
∆h22e30
P2∆2h0e0
∆h1d40
Pd40e0
P3d20k
P4ij
P8e0
P10h1
h6c1
h4Q3
e1g2
gH1
P2h2h6
gC0
Me0g
∆2e20
Md0i+∆2h0e
20
∆h1e0g2+∆2h0e
20
d0e40
P2d0e0m
P3im
P5∆h1e0
P5d30
P7j
h6g+h2e2
gC′
∆2m
MP∆h22
d0e20m
MP3d0
d20il
P2∆h1d30
P3d30e0
P4d20i
P10h2
f2
Px76,6
∆2t
∆h20B4
M∆h1d0
MPd0e0
d0m2
∆h1d30e0
P∆2h0d20
d60
P3d20l
P4ik
P7d20
c3
x85,6
Ph6d0
∆2x
Mg2
∆2e0g
Md0j+∆2h0e0g
∆h22gm
e50
P∆2h1d20
d40k
MP5
P3jm
P4∆h1d20
P5d20e0
P6d0i
h4h6c0
h6i
gG0
∆2e1
∆3h23
B4j
gnm
e30m
MP3e0
∆h22d40+P∆
2h31d20
P2∆h1d20e0
∆2P3h0d0
P2d50
P4d20j+h60 ·∆2P3h0d0
P9d0
x87,7
gQ3
∆h1H1
P2h6c0
gC′′
M∆h1e0
∆3h1d0
Md30
∆h22e0g2
P∆2d0e0
MP2j
∆h1d20e
20
d50e0
Pd40i
P3d0ij
P6∆h1d0
P7d0e0
P8i
g22
Ph6e0
∆g2g
∆2f1+?∆g2g
P3h1h6
∆2g2
Md0k
∆2h0e0i
e40g
d40l
d30i2
P3∆2h21d0
P4∆h1d0e0
P4d40
P6d0j
P10c0
h6j
∆2c2
M∆h22d0
∆3h20e0
e20gm+∆3h31d0
MP2d20
∆h22d30e0
P3∆2h0e0
P∆h1d40
P2d40e0
P3d30i
P5ij
P9e0
P11h1
x90,10
M2
P3h2h6
M∆h1g
∆3h1e0
Md20e0
gm2
∆2d30
MPd0i
∆h1d0e30
d40e20
Pd40j
P4im
P6∆h1e0
P6d30
P8j
h24D3
x91,8
h6d20
x91,11
∆h22A′
Md0l+h60x91,11
g3n
∆2h0e0j
d0e0g3
d40m
MP4d0
d30ij
P3∆h1d30
P4d30e0
P5d20i
P11h2
g3
h6k
x92,10
∆h22H1
∆2g2
mQ2
M∆h22e0
∆3h22d0
MP∆h1d0
e0g2m
MP2d0e0
∆h22d20e
20
P2∆2d20
MP3i+P2∆2h0d20
P∆h1d30e0
Pd60
P4d20l
P5ik
P8d20
h24h6
∆h22h6
x93,8
∆h3H1
∆∆1e0
P2h6d0
tQ2
∆3h1g
Md0e20
∆2d20e0
MPd0j
∆h1e40
P∆2h0d0i
d30e30
d50i
P4jm
P5∆h1d20
P6d20e0
P7d0i
h6n
x94,8
h6d0e0
y94,10
∆2Mh1
∆3h2c1
Md0m
∆2d0l
MP∆h20e0
e20g3
∆2i2
d30e0m
MP4e0+P2∆2h21d
20
d30ik+P2∆2h21d
20
P3∆h1d20e0
MP6h1
P3d50
P5d20j+h130 ·∆2i2
P6i2
P10d0
h6d1
x95,7
∆h1h3h6
h6l
∆x71,6
P3h6c0
M∆h22g
∆3h22e0
MP∆h1e0
g3m
∆3h20i
P∆3h1d0
MPd30
∆h22d20e0g
P2∆2d0e0
MP3j+P2∆2h0d0e0
∆h1d50
Pd50e0
P4d20m
P5il
P7∆h1d0
P8d0e0+P6∆h50i
7
-
The Classical Adams E8-page
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 480
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
The E∞-page of the classical Adams spectral sequence
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
h0 h1 h2 h3
c0
Ph1 Ph2
h23
d0 h30h4
h1h4
Pc0
P2h1
h2h4
c1
P2h2
g
Pd0
h4c0
h20i
P2c0
P3h1 P3h2
d20
h24
n
h100 h5
h1h5
d1
∆h1h3
P3c0
p
P4h1
h0h2h5
d0g
P4h2
t
h22h5
x
h20h3h5
h1h3h5
h5c0
h3d1
∆h1d0
P2h20i
f1
Ph1h5
g2
P4c0
∆h20e0
P5h1
Ph2h5
d30
P5h2
g2
h23h5
h5d0
∆h1g
Mh1
∆h2c1
d0l
Ph5c0
∆h22e0
P∆h1d0
h70Q′
Mh2
d20g
P5c0
P6h1
h5c1
C
h3g2
gn
P6h2
d1g
e0m
MP
∆h1d20
h0h5i
e20g
P4h20i
P6c0
P7h1
h1Q2
Md0
∆h1d0g
P7h2
g3
d20l
h25
h5n
∆e1+C0
∆2h23
h1H1
X2+C′
h250 h6
h1h6
h2D3
h2A′
h3Q2
∆2h1h4
P7c0
Mg
Ph5j
∆h1g2
P8h1
r1
B5+D′2
d0e0m
Q3+n1
∆2c1
P8h2
h3A′
h22h6
p′
h3(∆e1+C0)
h30h3h6
h1h3H1
h1D′3
m2+∆2h21g
h1h3h6
h6c0
h1p1
h3A′′
h23Q2
d0Q2
∆2h4c0
∆2h2g
P6h20i
Ph1h6
h4Q2+h23D2
h0d0D2
e0gm
P8c0
h0h4D2
Md20
∆h1d0e20
P9h1
h3(Q3+n1)
Ph0h2h6
x74,8
e20g2
h0h3d2
P9h2
h4A
d1g2
x76,9
h23h6
h6d0
h1h4D3
m1
h1x76,6
h0x77,7
M∆h1h3
h60h4h6
x78,9
e0A′
h1h4h6
h2x76,6
Ph6c0
h1x78,10
∆2n
Me20
P4h70Q′
h1x1
c1A′
P2h1h6
∆2d1
g4
P9c0
h2h4h6
h23n1
gD3
∆2p
P10h1
h6c1
h25g
e1g2
P2h2h6
h6g+h2e2
gC′
P10h2
h2gD3
Px76,6
∆2t
M∆h1d0
h1f2
x85,6
h2h4Q3
Ph6d0
∆2x
Mg2
∆h1g3
h4h6c0
h30h6i
M∆h20e0
h21c3
x87,7
gQ3
∆h1H1
P2h6c0
∆2h3d1
P8h20i
h1x87,7 + g22
∆2f1+?∆g2g
P3h1h6
P10c0
P11h1
M2
P3h2h6
M∆h1g
gm2
h24D3
∆h22A′
Md0l+h60x91,11
P11h2
h0g3
h1x91,8
x92,10
∆2g2
M∆h22e0
MP∆h1d0
h30h24h6
h30 · ∆h22h6
P2h6d0
e0x76,9
Md0e20
h1h24h6
h21g3
h6n
x94,8
d1H1
y94,10
∆h1h3H1
∆2Mh1
∆3h2c1
h2g3
h6d1
∆h1h3h6
e1Q2
∆2Mh21+?M∆h22g
P3h6c0
g3m
P6h60Q′
8
-
Adams differentials
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
Up to 6 differentials, we have complete info on E8 through 90.
§ 71-stem, d5 on h1p1,
§ 77-stem, d2 on x77,7,
§ 83-stem, d9 on h6g ` h2e2,§ 85-stem, d9 on x85,6,
§ 87-stem, d6 on ∆h1H1,
§ 87-stem, d9 on x87,7.
Theorem (Chua)
d2px77,7q “ h30x76,6.
Theorem (Burklund - Isaksen - X.)
d5ph1p1q “ 0.
-
Adams differentials
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
Up to 6 differentials, we have complete info on E8 through 90.
§ 71-stem, d5 on h1p1,
§ 77-stem, d2 on x77,7,
§ 83-stem, d9 on h6g ` h2e2,§ 85-stem, d9 on x85,6,
§ 87-stem, d6 on ∆h1H1,
§ 87-stem, d9 on x87,7.
Theorem (Chua)
d2px77,7q “ h30x76,6.
Theorem (Burklund - Isaksen - X.)
d5ph1p1q “ 0.
-
Adams differentials
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
Up to 6 differentials, we have complete info on E8 through 90.
§ 71-stem, d5 on h1p1,
§ 77-stem, d2 on x77,7,
§ 83-stem, d9 on h6g ` h2e2,§ 85-stem, d9 on x85,6,
§ 87-stem, d6 on ∆h1H1,
§ 87-stem, d9 on x87,7.
Theorem (Chua)
d2px77,7q “ h30x76,6.
Theorem (Burklund - Isaksen - X.)
d5ph1p1q “ 0.
-
Hopf classes and Kervaire classes
§ hj : Hopf classes
§ h0, h1, h2, h3 survive and detect 2, η, ν, σ.
§ Adams: d2phjq “ h0h2j´1, for n ě 4.
§ h2j : Kervaire classes
§ h2j , 0 ď j ď 5 survive and detect θj .
§ Hill-Hopkins-Ravenel: For j ě 7, h2j supports a nonzero differential.
§ h26 is still open.
Question
What are the differentials that h2j , j ě 7 support?
-
Hopf classes and Kervaire classes
§ hj : Hopf classes
§ h0, h1, h2, h3 survive and detect 2, η, ν, σ.
§ Adams: d2phjq “ h0h2j´1, for n ě 4.
§ h2j : Kervaire classes
§ h2j , 0 ď j ď 5 survive and detect θj .
§ Hill-Hopkins-Ravenel: For j ě 7, h2j supports a nonzero differential.
§ h26 is still open.
Question
What are the differentials that h2j , j ě 7 support?
-
Hopf classes and Kervaire classes
§ hj : Hopf classes
§ h0, h1, h2, h3 survive and detect 2, η, ν, σ.
§ Adams: d2phjq “ h0h2j´1, for n ě 4.
§ h2j : Kervaire classes
§ h2j , 0 ď j ď 5 survive and detect θj .
§ Hill-Hopkins-Ravenel: For j ě 7, h2j supports a nonzero differential.
§ h26 is still open.
Question
What are the differentials that h2j , j ě 7 support?
-
Hopf classes and Kervaire classes
Easy to show for all j ,
§ d2ph2j q “ 0,
§ d3ph2j q “ 0.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph2j q “ 0, for all j .
Work in progress: For j large enough,
§ d5ph2j q “ 0,
§ d6ph2j q “ 0.
-
Hopf classes and Kervaire classes
Easy to show for all j ,
§ d2ph2j q “ 0,
§ d3ph2j q “ 0.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph2j q “ 0, for all j .
Work in progress: For j large enough,
§ d5ph2j q “ 0,
§ d6ph2j q “ 0.
-
Hopf classes, Kervaire classes and ???
Question
What about h3j , h4j , ¨ ¨ ¨ ?
§ h4j “ 0 in Ext for j ě 1.ñ Only need to discuss h3j .
§ h3j survives for 0 ď j ď 4.
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ d4ph35q “ h30g3.§ h20g3 detects θ4θ5.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph3j q “ h30gj´2` possible other classes, for j ě 6.
-
Hopf classes, Kervaire classes and ???
Question
What about h3j , h4j , ¨ ¨ ¨ ?
§ h4j “ 0 in Ext for j ě 1.ñ Only need to discuss h3j .
§ h3j survives for 0 ď j ď 4.
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ d4ph35q “ h30g3.§ h20g3 detects θ4θ5.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph3j q “ h30gj´2` possible other classes, for j ě 6.
-
Hopf classes, Kervaire classes and ???
Question
What about h3j , h4j , ¨ ¨ ¨ ?
§ h4j “ 0 in Ext for j ě 1.ñ Only need to discuss h3j .
§ h3j survives for 0 ď j ď 4.
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ d4ph35q “ h30g3.§ h20g3 detects θ4θ5.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph3j q “ h30gj´2` possible other classes, for j ě 6.
-
Hopf classes, Kervaire classes and ???
Question
What about h3j , h4j , ¨ ¨ ¨ ?
§ h4j “ 0 in Ext for j ě 1.ñ Only need to discuss h3j .
§ h3j survives for 0 ď j ď 4.
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ d4ph35q “ h30g3.§ h20g3 detects θ4θ5.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph3j q “ h30gj´2` possible other classes, for j ě 6.
-
Hopf classes, Kervaire classes and ???
Question
What about h3j , h4j , ¨ ¨ ¨ ?
§ h4j “ 0 in Ext for j ě 1.ñ Only need to discuss h3j .
§ h3j survives for 0 ď j ď 4.
Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ d4ph35q “ h30g3.§ h20g3 detects θ4θ5.
Theorem (Burklund - X.)
§ d4ph3j q “ h30gj´2` possible other classes, for j ě 6.
-
The open case θ6Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ h30h35 survives and detects xθ4, 2, θ5y .
§ For any α P xθ4, 2, θ5y, if ηα “ 0, and 0 P xα, η, 2y, then θ6 exists.
126
2 $$
η
!!126
θ5
125
α2
θ563
2
312
124
α
62
θ5 22
30 θ4((0
S126f // X
g // S0
-
The open case θ6Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ h30h35 survives and detects xθ4, 2, θ5y .
§ For any α P xθ4, 2, θ5y, if ηα “ 0, and 0 P xα, η, 2y, then θ6 exists.
126
2 $$
η
!!126
θ5
125
α2
θ563
2
312
124
α
62
θ5 22
30 θ4((0
S126f // X
g // S0
-
The open case θ6Theorem (Isaksen - Wang - X.)
§ h30h35 survives and detects xθ4, 2, θ5y .
§ For any α P xθ4, 2, θ5y, if ηα “ 0, and 0 P xα, η, 2y, then θ6 exists.
126
2 $$
η
!!126
θ5
125
α2
θ563
2
312
124
α
62
θ5 22
30 θ4((0
S126f // X
g // S0
-
Cellular Motivic Stable Homotopy Category SHpkqcell
§ S1,0: simplicial sphere S1
§ S1,1: A1 ´ t0u “ Gm
§ Stabilization with respect to S2,1
§ 1: the motivic sphere spectrum
§ HFp: motivic mod p Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere
§ MGL: algebraic cobordism spectrum
§ Motivic analogue of classical computational tools exist!
-
Cellular Motivic Stable Homotopy Category SHpkqcell
§ S1,0: simplicial sphere S1
§ S1,1: A1 ´ t0u “ Gm§ Stabilization with respect to S2,1
§ 1: the motivic sphere spectrum
§ HFp: motivic mod p Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere
§ MGL: algebraic cobordism spectrum
§ Motivic analogue of classical computational tools exist!
-
Cellular Motivic Stable Homotopy Category SHpkqcell
§ S1,0: simplicial sphere S1
§ S1,1: A1 ´ t0u “ Gm§ Stabilization with respect to S2,1
§ 1: the motivic sphere spectrum
§ HFp: motivic mod p Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere
§ MGL: algebraic cobordism spectrum
§ Motivic analogue of classical computational tools exist!
-
Cellular Motivic Stable Homotopy Category SHpkqcell
§ S1,0: simplicial sphere S1
§ S1,1: A1 ´ t0u “ Gm§ Stabilization with respect to S2,1
§ 1: the motivic sphere spectrum
§ HFp: motivic mod p Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere
§ MGL: algebraic cobordism spectrum
§ Motivic analogue of classical computational tools exist!
-
Cellular Motivic Stable Homotopy Category SHpkqcell
§ S1,0: simplicial sphere S1
§ S1,1: A1 ´ t0u “ Gm§ Stabilization with respect to S2,1
§ 1: the motivic sphere spectrum
§ HFp: motivic mod p Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere
§ MGL: algebraic cobordism spectrum
§ Motivic analogue of classical computational tools exist!
-
Over Spec CTheorem (Voevodsky)
π˚,˚HFp “ Fprτ s, |τ | “ p0,´1q.
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1Ñ p1.§ p1{τ : the cofiber of τ .
Theorem (Isaksen)
motAdamsNovikovSSpp1{τq collapses at E2.
Theorem (Gheorghe - Wang - X.)
p1{τ -Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq
Alternative proofs: Krause, and Pstra̧gowski.
-
Over Spec CTheorem (Voevodsky)
π˚,˚HFp “ Fprτ s, |τ | “ p0,´1q.
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1Ñ p1.§ p1{τ : the cofiber of τ .
Theorem (Isaksen)
motAdamsNovikovSSpp1{τq collapses at E2.
Theorem (Gheorghe - Wang - X.)
p1{τ -Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq
Alternative proofs: Krause, and Pstra̧gowski.
-
Over Spec CTheorem (Voevodsky)
π˚,˚HFp “ Fprτ s, |τ | “ p0,´1q.
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1Ñ p1.§ p1{τ : the cofiber of τ .
Theorem (Isaksen)
motAdamsNovikovSSpp1{τq collapses at E2.
Theorem (Gheorghe - Wang - X.)
p1{τ -Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq
Alternative proofs: Krause, and Pstra̧gowski.
-
Over Spec CTheorem (Voevodsky)
π˚,˚HFp “ Fprτ s, |τ | “ p0,´1q.
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1Ñ p1.§ p1{τ : the cofiber of τ .
Theorem (Isaksen)
motAdamsNovikovSSpp1{τq collapses at E2.
Theorem (Gheorghe - Wang - X.)
p1{τ -Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq
Alternative proofs: Krause, and Pstra̧gowski.
-
Isomorphism of spectral sequences
Theorem (Gheorghe - Wang - X.)
algNovikovSSpBP˚q – motAdamsSSpp1{τq.
Exts,2wBP˚BPpFp, Ia´s{I a´s`1q
Algebraic Novikov SS
��
– // Exta,2w´s`a,wA pFprτ s,Fpq
Motivic Adams SS
��Exts,2wBP˚BPpBP˚,BP˚q
– // π2w´s,w pp1{τq.
-
Strategy of Stem-wise Computations
§ Compute Ext over C.§ Compute algNovikovSSpBP˚q, including all differentials.
§ algNovikovSSpBP˚q – motAdamsSSpp1{τq§
p1 ÝÑ p1{τ ÝÑ Σ1,´1p1
pull back Adams differentials from p1{τ to p1.§ Apply ad hoc arguments such as shuffling Toda brackets.
§ Invert τ .
-
Strategy of Stem-wise Computations
§ Compute Ext over C.§ Compute algNovikovSSpBP˚q, including all differentials.§ algNovikovSSpBP˚q – motAdamsSSpp1{τq
§p1 ÝÑ p1{τ ÝÑ Σ1,´1p1
pull back Adams differentials from p1{τ to p1.§ Apply ad hoc arguments such as shuffling Toda brackets.
§ Invert τ .
-
Strategy of Stem-wise Computations
§ Compute Ext over C.§ Compute algNovikovSSpBP˚q, including all differentials.§ algNovikovSSpBP˚q – motAdamsSSpp1{τq§
p1 ÝÑ p1{τ ÝÑ Σ1,´1p1
pull back Adams differentials from p1{τ to p1.§ Apply ad hoc arguments such as shuffling Toda brackets.
§ Invert τ .
-
Strategy of Stem-wise Computations
§ Compute Ext over C.§ Compute algNovikovSSpBP˚q, including all differentials.§ algNovikovSSpBP˚q – motAdamsSSpp1{τq§
p1 ÝÑ p1{τ ÝÑ Σ1,´1p1
pull back Adams differentials from p1{τ to p1.§ Apply ad hoc arguments such as shuffling Toda brackets.
§ Invert τ .
-
General Questions
Questions
§ Can this p1{τ method be applied to other fields?
§ What about the non-cellular part?
-
General Questions
Questions
§ Can this p1{τ method be applied to other fields?§ What about the non-cellular part?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
§ X : smooth projective scheme over k ,
§ ξ: virtual vector bundle over X ,
§ ThpX , ξq: its Thom spectrum.
Definition (Chow-Novikov t-structure)
§ SHpkqtě0: full subcategory generated by ThpX , ξqunder colimits and extensions.
§ SHpkqtă0: objects Y such that for any object X P SHpkqtě0,
rX ,Y sSHpkq “ 0.
This defines a t-structure.
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
§ X : smooth projective scheme over k ,
§ ξ: virtual vector bundle over X ,
§ ThpX , ξq: its Thom spectrum.
Definition (Chow-Novikov t-structure)
§ SHpkqtě0: full subcategory generated by ThpX , ξqunder colimits and extensions.
§ SHpkqtă0: objects Y such that for any object X P SHpkqtě0,
rX ,Y sSHpkq “ 0.
This defines a t-structure.
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
§ X : smooth projective scheme over k ,
§ ξ: virtual vector bundle over X ,
§ ThpX , ξq: its Thom spectrum.
Definition (Chow-Novikov t-structure)
§ SHpkqtě0: full subcategory generated by ThpX , ξqunder colimits and extensions.
§ SHpkqtă0: objects Y such that for any object X P SHpkqtě0,
rX ,Y sSHpkq “ 0.
This defines a t-structure.
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
§ X : smooth projective scheme over k ,
§ ξ: virtual vector bundle over X ,
§ ThpX , ξq: its Thom spectrum.
Definition (Chow-Novikov t-structure)
§ SHpkqtě0: full subcategory generated by ThpX , ξqunder colimits and extensions.
§ SHpkqtă0: objects Y such that for any object X P SHpkqtě0,
rX ,Y sSHpkq “ 0.
This defines a t-structure.
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
§ X : smooth projective scheme over k ,
§ ξ: virtual vector bundle over X ,
§ ThpX , ξq: its Thom spectrum.
Definition (Chow-Novikov t-structure)
§ SHpkqtě0: full subcategory generated by ThpX , ξqunder colimits and extensions.
§ SHpkqtă0: objects Y such that for any object X P SHpkqtě0,
rX ,Y sSHpkq “ 0.
This defines a t-structure.
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq§ Hopkins-Morel, Levine:
MGL˚,˚ is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.Chow-Novikov degree 0 part “ MU˚.
§ X P SHpkqtě0 ñMGL˚,˚X is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ Y P SHpkqtă0 ñ
MGL˚,˚Y “ colim π˚,˚Σ´2n,´nThpGr ,V q ^ Y“ colim rΣ˚,˚1^ Σ2n,nDpThpGr ,V qq,Y sSHpkq“ 0 on ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
MGL˚,˚Y is in ă 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.§ X P SHpkq♥ ñ MGL˚,˚X is in Chow-Novikov degree 0.
Question
What is this heart?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq§ Hopkins-Morel, Levine:
MGL˚,˚ is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.Chow-Novikov degree 0 part “ MU˚.
§ X P SHpkqtě0 ñMGL˚,˚X is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ Y P SHpkqtă0 ñ
MGL˚,˚Y “ colim π˚,˚Σ´2n,´nThpGr ,V q ^ Y“ colim rΣ˚,˚1^ Σ2n,nDpThpGr ,V qq,Y sSHpkq“ 0 on ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
MGL˚,˚Y is in ă 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.§ X P SHpkq♥ ñ MGL˚,˚X is in Chow-Novikov degree 0.
Question
What is this heart?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq§ Hopkins-Morel, Levine:
MGL˚,˚ is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.Chow-Novikov degree 0 part “ MU˚.
§ X P SHpkqtě0 ñMGL˚,˚X is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ Y P SHpkqtă0 ñ
MGL˚,˚Y “ colim π˚,˚Σ´2n,´nThpGr ,V q ^ Y“ colim rΣ˚,˚1^ Σ2n,nDpThpGr ,V qq,Y sSHpkq“ 0 on ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
MGL˚,˚Y is in ă 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.§ X P SHpkq♥ ñ MGL˚,˚X is in Chow-Novikov degree 0.
Question
What is this heart?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq§ Hopkins-Morel, Levine:
MGL˚,˚ is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.Chow-Novikov degree 0 part “ MU˚.
§ X P SHpkqtě0 ñMGL˚,˚X is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ Y P SHpkqtă0 ñ
MGL˚,˚Y “ colim π˚,˚Σ´2n,´nThpGr ,V q ^ Y“ colim rΣ˚,˚1^ Σ2n,nDpThpGr ,V qq,Y sSHpkq“ 0 on ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
MGL˚,˚Y is in ă 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ X P SHpkq♥ ñ MGL˚,˚X is in Chow-Novikov degree 0.
Question
What is this heart?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq§ Hopkins-Morel, Levine:
MGL˚,˚ is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.Chow-Novikov degree 0 part “ MU˚.
§ X P SHpkqtě0 ñMGL˚,˚X is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ Y P SHpkqtă0 ñ
MGL˚,˚Y “ colim π˚,˚Σ´2n,´nThpGr ,V q ^ Y“ colim rΣ˚,˚1^ Σ2n,nDpThpGr ,V qq,Y sSHpkq“ 0 on ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
MGL˚,˚Y is in ă 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.§ X P SHpkq♥ ñ MGL˚,˚X is in Chow-Novikov degree 0.
Question
What is this heart?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq§ Hopkins-Morel, Levine:
MGL˚,˚ is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.Chow-Novikov degree 0 part “ MU˚.
§ X P SHpkqtě0 ñMGL˚,˚X is in ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
§ Y P SHpkqtă0 ñ
MGL˚,˚Y “ colim π˚,˚Σ´2n,´nThpGr ,V q ^ Y“ colim rΣ˚,˚1^ Σ2n,nDpThpGr ,V qq,Y sSHpkq“ 0 on ě 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.
MGL˚,˚Y is in ă 0 Chow-Novikov degrees.§ X P SHpkq♥ ñ MGL˚,˚X is in Chow-Novikov degree 0.
Question
What is this heart?
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
MGL-ModU // SHpkqF
oo // τtď01-Mod
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥ » FunˆphPMopMGL,Setq,
§ SHpkq♥ » τtď01-Mod♥ » C -Comod, C “ FU.
Restricting to cellular subcategories,
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥cell » MU˚-Mod,
§ SHpkq♥cell » MU˚MU-Comod,§ τtď01cell-Modcell » StablepMU˚MU-Comodq
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
MGL-ModU // SHpkqF
oo // τtď01-Mod
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥ » FunˆphPMopMGL,Setq,
§ SHpkq♥ » τtď01-Mod♥ » C -Comod, C “ FU.
Restricting to cellular subcategories,
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥cell » MU˚-Mod,
§ SHpkq♥cell » MU˚MU-Comod,§ τtď01cell-Modcell » StablepMU˚MU-Comodq
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
MGL-ModU // SHpkqF
oo // τtď01-Mod
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥ » FunˆphPMopMGL,Setq,
§ SHpkq♥ » τtď01-Mod♥ » C -Comod, C “ FU.
Restricting to cellular subcategories,
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥cell » MU˚-Mod,
§ SHpkq♥cell » MU˚MU-Comod,§ τtď01cell-Modcell » StablepMU˚MU-Comodq
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
MGL-ModU // SHpkqF
oo // τtď01-Mod
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥ » FunˆphPMopMGL,Setq,
§ SHpkq♥ » τtď01-Mod♥ » C -Comod, C “ FU.
Restricting to cellular subcategories,
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥cell » MU˚-Mod,
§ SHpkq♥cell » MU˚MU-Comod,§ τtď01cell-Modcell » StablepMU˚MU-Comodq
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
MGL-ModU // SHpkqF
oo // τtď01-Mod
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥ » FunˆphPMopMGL,Setq,
§ SHpkq♥ » τtď01-Mod♥ » C -Comod, C “ FU.
Restricting to cellular subcategories,
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥cell » MU˚-Mod,
§ SHpkq♥cell » MU˚MU-Comod,
§ τtď01cell-Modcell » StablepMU˚MU-Comodq
-
Chow-Novikov t-structure on SHpkq
MGL-ModU // SHpkqF
oo // τtď01-Mod
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥ » FunˆphPMopMGL,Setq,
§ SHpkq♥ » τtď01-Mod♥ » C -Comod, C “ FU.
Restricting to cellular subcategories,
Theorem (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)
§ MGL-Mod♥cell » MU˚-Mod,
§ SHpkq♥cell » MU˚MU-Comod,§ τtď01cell-Modcell » StablepMU˚MU-Comodq
-
Motivic Adams and Adams-Novikov spectral sequences
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere,
§ p1t“0: cellularization of τtď0p1,
§ p1t“0-Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq,§ X P p1t“0-Mod♥cell ñ BPGL˚,˚X is a BP˚BP-comodule.
Work in progress: (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)For X P p1t“0-Mod♥,
§ motAdamsNovikovSSpX q collapses,§ motAdamsSSpX q – algNovikovSSpBPGL˚,˚X q.
-
Motivic Adams and Adams-Novikov spectral sequences
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere,
§ p1t“0: cellularization of τtď0p1,
§ p1t“0-Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq,
§ X P p1t“0-Mod♥cell ñ BPGL˚,˚X is a BP˚BP-comodule.
Work in progress: (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)For X P p1t“0-Mod♥,
§ motAdamsNovikovSSpX q collapses,§ motAdamsSSpX q – algNovikovSSpBPGL˚,˚X q.
-
Motivic Adams and Adams-Novikov spectral sequences
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere,
§ p1t“0: cellularization of τtď0p1,
§ p1t“0-Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq,§ X P p1t“0-Mod♥cell ñ BPGL˚,˚X is a BP˚BP-comodule.
Work in progress: (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)For X P p1t“0-Mod♥,
§ motAdamsNovikovSSpX q collapses,§ motAdamsSSpX q – algNovikovSSpBPGL˚,˚X q.
-
Motivic Adams and Adams-Novikov spectral sequences
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere,
§ p1t“0: cellularization of τtď0p1,
§ p1t“0-Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq,§ X P p1t“0-Mod♥cell ñ BPGL˚,˚X is a BP˚BP-comodule.
Work in progress: (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)For X P p1t“0-Mod♥,
§ motAdamsNovikovSSpX q collapses,§ motAdamsSSpX q – algNovikovSSpBPGL˚,˚X q.
-
Motivic Adams and Adams-Novikov spectral sequences
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere,
§ p1t“0: cellularization of τtď0p1,
§ p1t“0-Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq,§ X P p1t“0-Mod♥cell ñ BPGL˚,˚X is a BP˚BP-comodule.
Work in progress: (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)For X P p1t“0-Mod♥,
§ motAdamsNovikovSSpX q collapses,
§ motAdamsSSpX q – algNovikovSSpBPGL˚,˚X q.
-
Motivic Adams and Adams-Novikov spectral sequences
§ p1: HFp-completed sphere,
§ p1t“0: cellularization of τtď0p1,
§ p1t“0-Modcell » StablepBP˚BP-Comodq,§ X P p1t“0-Mod♥cell ñ BPGL˚,˚X is a BP˚BP-comodule.
Work in progress: (Bachmann - Kong - Wang - X.)For X P p1t“0-Mod♥,
§ motAdamsNovikovSSpX q collapses,§ motAdamsSSpX q – algNovikovSSpBPGL˚,˚X q.
-
Postnikov Tower
Postnikov tower for p1 w.r.t. the Chow-Novikov t-structure:
��p1tě2
��
//p1t“2
p1tě1
��
//p1t“1
p1 p1 // p1t“0
§ p1t“n: cellular spectrum such that
BPGL˚,˚p1t“n “ Chow-Novikov degree n part of BPGL˚,˚.
-
Postnikov Tower
Postnikov tower for p1 w.r.t. the Chow-Novikov t-structure:
��p1tě2
��
//p1t“2
p1tě1
��
//p1t“1
p1 p1 // p1t“0
§ p1t“n: cellular spectrum such that
BPGL˚,˚p1t“n “ Chow-Novikov degree n part of BPGL˚,˚.
-
Computing Stable Stems over k
Apply the motivic Adams spectral sequences:
��motASSpp1tě2q
��
// motASSpp1t“2q algNSSpBPGL˚,˚p1t“2q
motASSpp1tě1q
��
// motASSpp1t“1q algNSSpBPGL˚,˚p1t“1q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1t“0q algNSSpBPGL˚,˚p1t“0q
-
Stable Stems over C
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ Zprτ, v1, v2, ¨ ¨ ¨ s,
§ Chow-Novikov degree: |τ | “ 2, |vi | “ 0.§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k: Σ0,´kBP˚,
§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k ` 1: 0.§ p1“2k “ Σ0,´kp1{τ , k ě 0§ p1“2k`1 “ ˚.
motASSpΣ0,´2p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´2p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´2BP˚q
motASSpΣ0,´1p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´1p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´1BP˚q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{τq algNSSpBP˚q
-
Stable Stems over C
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ Zprτ, v1, v2, ¨ ¨ ¨ s,§ Chow-Novikov degree: |τ | “ 2, |vi | “ 0.
§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k: Σ0,´kBP˚,
§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k ` 1: 0.§ p1“2k “ Σ0,´kp1{τ , k ě 0§ p1“2k`1 “ ˚.
motASSpΣ0,´2p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´2p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´2BP˚q
motASSpΣ0,´1p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´1p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´1BP˚q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{τq algNSSpBP˚q
-
Stable Stems over C
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ Zprτ, v1, v2, ¨ ¨ ¨ s,§ Chow-Novikov degree: |τ | “ 2, |vi | “ 0.§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k : Σ0,´kBP˚,
§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k ` 1: 0.
§ p1“2k “ Σ0,´kp1{τ , k ě 0§ p1“2k`1 “ ˚.
motASSpΣ0,´2p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´2p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´2BP˚q
motASSpΣ0,´1p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´1p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´1BP˚q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{τq algNSSpBP˚q
-
Stable Stems over C
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ Zprτ, v1, v2, ¨ ¨ ¨ s,§ Chow-Novikov degree: |τ | “ 2, |vi | “ 0.§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k : Σ0,´kBP˚,
§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k ` 1: 0.§ p1“2k “ Σ0,´kp1{τ , k ě 0§ p1“2k`1 “ ˚.
motASSpΣ0,´2p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´2p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´2BP˚q
motASSpΣ0,´1p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´1p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´1BP˚q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{τq algNSSpBP˚q
-
Stable Stems over C
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ Zprτ, v1, v2, ¨ ¨ ¨ s,§ Chow-Novikov degree: |τ | “ 2, |vi | “ 0.§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k : Σ0,´kBP˚,
§ Chow-Novikov degree 2k ` 1: 0.§ p1“2k “ Σ0,´kp1{τ , k ě 0§ p1“2k`1 “ ˚.
motASSpΣ0,´2p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´2p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´2BP˚q
motASSpΣ0,´1p1q
��
// motASSpΣ0,´1p1{τq algNSSpΣ0,´1BP˚q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{τq algNSSpBP˚q
-
Stable Stems over R
§ π˚,˚HFp “ Fprρ, τ s|τ | “ p0,´1q, |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ ρ : Σ´1,´11Ñ 1, ρ : Σ´1,´1p1Ñ p1§ p1{ρ: cofiber of ρ
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1{ρ ÝÑ p1{ρ§ p1{pρ, τq: its cofiber - a 4 cell complex.
§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.
-
Stable Stems over R
§ π˚,˚HFp “ Fprρ, τ s|τ | “ p0,´1q, |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ ρ : Σ´1,´11Ñ 1, ρ : Σ´1,´1p1Ñ p1§ p1{ρ: cofiber of ρ
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1{ρ ÝÑ p1{ρ§ p1{pρ, τq: its cofiber - a 4 cell complex.
§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.
-
Stable Stems over R
§ π˚,˚HFp “ Fprρ, τ s|τ | “ p0,´1q, |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ ρ : Σ´1,´11Ñ 1, ρ : Σ´1,´1p1Ñ p1§ p1{ρ: cofiber of ρ
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1{ρ ÝÑ p1{ρ
§ p1{pρ, τq: its cofiber - a 4 cell complex.
§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.
-
Stable Stems over R
§ π˚,˚HFp “ Fprρ, τ s|τ | “ p0,´1q, |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ ρ : Σ´1,´11Ñ 1, ρ : Σ´1,´1p1Ñ p1§ p1{ρ: cofiber of ρ
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1{ρ ÝÑ p1{ρ§ p1{pρ, τq: its cofiber - a 4 cell complex.
§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.
-
Stable Stems over R
§ π˚,˚HFp “ Fprρ, τ s|τ | “ p0,´1q, |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ ρ : Σ´1,´11Ñ 1, ρ : Σ´1,´1p1Ñ p1§ p1{ρ: cofiber of ρ
§ τ : Σ0,´1p1{ρ ÝÑ p1{ρ§ p1{pρ, τq: its cofiber - a 4 cell complex.
§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.
-
Stable Stems over R at p “ 2
Theorem (Hu-Kriz, Hill)
BPGL˚,˚ “ Z2
»
—
—
—
—
–
ρ,v0, τ
2v0, τ4v0, τ
6v0, τ8v0, ¨ ¨ ¨
v1, τ4v1, τ
8v1, ¨ ¨ ¨v2, τ
8v2, ¨ ¨ ¨¨ ¨ ¨
fi
ffi
ffi
ffi
ffi
fl
{
»
—
—
—
—
–
v0 “ 2ρv0 “ 0ρ3v1 “ 0ρ7v2 “ 0¨ ¨ ¨
fi
ffi
ffi
ffi
ffi
fl
and the generators satisfy the further relations
τ 2i`1¨jvi ¨ τ 2
k`1¨lvk “ τ 2i`1pj`2k´i lqvivk
when i ď k, as if the class τ were an element in this ring.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.
§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.
§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R§ Chow-Novikov = 0: Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s “ BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov = 1: ρ ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´1,´1BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 2: ρ2 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{ρv0 “ Σ´2,´2BP˚{2.§ Chow-Novikov = 3:ρ3 ¨ Z2rv0, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ s{pρv0, ρ3v1q “ Σ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 4:ρ4BP˚ ‘ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´4,´4BP˚{p2, v1q ‘ Σ0,´2BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov = 5:ρ5BP˚ ‘ ppρ ¨ τ 2v0 “ 0qBP˚ “ Σ´5,´5BP˚{p2, v1q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 6: ρ6BP˚ ‘ ρ2 ¨ τ 2v0BP˚ “ Σ´6,´6BP˚{p2, v1q.§ Chow-Novikov = 7: ρ7BP˚ “ Σ´7,´7BP˚{p2, v1, v2q.
§ Chow-Novikov = 8: ρ8BP˚ ‘ τ4v0BP˚‘τ 4v1BP˚τ 4v0¨v1´τ 4v1¨v0
“ Σ´8,´8BP˚{p2, v1, v2q ‘ pΣ0,´4BP˚ ` Σ2,´3BP˚{2q.
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R
0 // Σ|vn`1|BP˚{Invn`1 // BP˚{In // BP˚{In`1 // 0.
BP˚{In can be inductively realized by p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ , vnq.§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.§ p1t“1 » Σ´1,´1p1{pρ, τ, 2q.§ p1t“2 » Σ´2,´2p1{pρ, τ, 2q.§ p1t“3 » Σ´3,´3p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“4 » Σ´4,´4p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q _ Σ0,´2p1{pρ, τq.§ p1t“5 » Σ´5,´5p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“6 » Σ´6,´6p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“7 » Σ´7,´7p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, v2q.§ p1t“8 » Σ´8,´8p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, v2q _ X , X “ cofiber of:
Σ´2,´3p1{pρ, τqpv0,v1q // Σ´2,´3p1{pρ, τq _ Σ0,´4p1{pρ, τq
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R
0 // Σ|vn`1|BP˚{Invn`1 // BP˚{In // BP˚{In`1 // 0.
BP˚{In can be inductively realized by p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ , vnq.
§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.§ p1t“1 » Σ´1,´1p1{pρ, τ, 2q.§ p1t“2 » Σ´2,´2p1{pρ, τ, 2q.§ p1t“3 » Σ´3,´3p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“4 » Σ´4,´4p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q _ Σ0,´2p1{pρ, τq.§ p1t“5 » Σ´5,´5p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“6 » Σ´6,´6p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“7 » Σ´7,´7p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, v2q.§ p1t“8 » Σ´8,´8p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, v2q _ X , X “ cofiber of:
Σ´2,´3p1{pρ, τqpv0,v1q // Σ´2,´3p1{pρ, τq _ Σ0,´4p1{pρ, τq
-
Low Chow-Novikov degrees over R
0 // Σ|vn`1|BP˚{Invn`1 // BP˚{In // BP˚{In`1 // 0.
BP˚{In can be inductively realized by p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, ¨ ¨ ¨ , vnq.§ p1t“0 » p1{pρ, τq.§ p1t“1 » Σ´1,´1p1{pρ, τ, 2q.§ p1t“2 » Σ´2,´2p1{pρ, τ, 2q.§ p1t“3 » Σ´3,´3p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“4 » Σ´4,´4p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q _ Σ0,´2p1{pρ, τq.§ p1t“5 » Σ´5,´5p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“6 » Σ´6,´6p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1q.§ p1t“7 » Σ´7,´7p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, v2q.§ p1t“8 » Σ´8,´8p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1, v2q _ X , X “ cofiber of:
Σ´2,´3p1{pρ, τqpv0,v1q // Σ´2,´3p1{pρ, τq _ Σ0,´4p1{pρ, τq
-
Stable Stems over R at p “ 2
motASSpp1tě3q
��
// motASSpΣ´3,´3p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1qq
algNSSpΣ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1qq
motASSpp1tě2q
��
// motASSpΣ´2,´2p1{pρ, τ, 2qq
algNSSpΣ´2,´2BP˚{2q
motASSpp1tě1q
��
// motASSpΣ´1,´1p1{pρ, τ, 2qq
algNSSpΣ´1,´1BP˚{2q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{pρ, τqq algNSSpBP˚q
More purely algebraic parts!
-
Stable Stems over R at p “ 2
motASSpp1tě3q
��
// motASSpΣ´3,´3p1{pρ, τ, 2, v1qq
algNSSpΣ´3,´3BP˚{p2, v1qq
motASSpp1tě2q
��
// motASSpΣ´2,´2p1{pρ, τ, 2qq
algNSSpΣ´2,´2BP˚{2q
motASSpp1tě1q
��
// motASSpΣ´1,´1p1{pρ, τ, 2qq
algNSSpΣ´1,´1BP˚{2q
motASSpp1q motASSpp1q // motASSpp1{pρ, τqq algNSSpBP˚q
More purely algebraic parts!
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2
§ q: power of an odd prime,
§ Fq: finite field with q elements,
§ π˚,˚HF2 “#
F2rτ, us{u2, Sq1τ “ 0 if q ” 1 mod 4,F2rτ, ρs{ρ2, Sq1τ “ ρ if q ” 3 mod 4.
|τ | “ p0,´1q, |u| “ |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ π˚,˚HZ2 “#
Z2 if p˚, ˚q “ p0, 0q,pZ{pqw ´ 1qq^2 if p˚, ˚q “ p´1,´wq and w ě 0.
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ π˚,˚HZ2 b BP˚.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2
§ q: power of an odd prime,
§ Fq: finite field with q elements,
§ π˚,˚HF2 “#
F2rτ, us{u2, Sq1τ “ 0 if q ” 1 mod 4,F2rτ, ρs{ρ2, Sq1τ “ ρ if q ” 3 mod 4.
|τ | “ p0,´1q, |u| “ |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ π˚,˚HZ2 “#
Z2 if p˚, ˚q “ p0, 0q,pZ{pqw ´ 1qq^2 if p˚, ˚q “ p´1,´wq and w ě 0.
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ π˚,˚HZ2 b BP˚.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2
§ q: power of an odd prime,
§ Fq: finite field with q elements,
§ π˚,˚HF2 “#
F2rτ, us{u2, Sq1τ “ 0 if q ” 1 mod 4,F2rτ, ρs{ρ2, Sq1τ “ ρ if q ” 3 mod 4.
|τ | “ p0,´1q, |u| “ |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ π˚,˚HZ2 “#
Z2 if p˚, ˚q “ p0, 0q,pZ{pqw ´ 1qq^2 if p˚, ˚q “ p´1,´wq and w ě 0.
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ π˚,˚HZ2 b BP˚.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2
§ q: power of an odd prime,
§ Fq: finite field with q elements,
§ π˚,˚HF2 “#
F2rτ, us{u2, Sq1τ “ 0 if q ” 1 mod 4,F2rτ, ρs{ρ2, Sq1τ “ ρ if q ” 3 mod 4.
|τ | “ p0,´1q, |u| “ |ρ| “ p´1,´1q.
§ π˚,˚HZ2 “#
Z2 if p˚, ˚q “ p0, 0q,pZ{pqw ´ 1qq^2 if p˚, ˚q “ p´1,´wq and w ě 0.
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ π˚,˚HZ2 b BP˚.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2
§ π˚,˚HZ2 “#
Z2 if p˚, ˚q “ p0, 0q,pZ{pqw ´ 1qq^2 if p˚, ˚q “ p´1,´wq and w ě 0.
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ π˚,˚HZ2 b BP˚.
§ Chow-Novikov degree 1 part of π˚,˚BPGL “$
’
&
’
%
Σ´1,´1BP˚{2 if q ” 3 mod 4,Σ´1,´1BP˚{4 if q ” 5 mod 8,Σ´1,´1BP˚{8 ¨ 2m if q ” 1 mod 8.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2
§ π˚,˚HZ2 “#
Z2 if p˚, ˚q “ p0, 0q,pZ{pqw ´ 1qq^2 if p˚, ˚q “ p´1,´wq and w ě 0.
§ π˚,˚BPGL “ π˚,˚HZ2 b BP˚.§ Chow-Novikov degree 1 part of π˚,˚BPGL “
$
’
&
’
%
Σ´1,´1BP˚{2 if q ” 3 mod 4,Σ´1,´1BP˚{4 if q ” 5 mod 8,Σ´1,´1BP˚{8 ¨ 2m if q ” 1 mod 8.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2§ Hoyois-Kelly-Østvær computed the mod 2 Steenrod algebra over Fq,
§ Wilson-Østvær computed πn,0 for#
0 ď n ď 20 if q ” 1 mod 4,0 ď n ď 18 if q ” 3 mod 4.
Proposition (Wilson-Østvær)
§ d2pτgq “ uh20g , if q ” 5 mod 8,§ d2pτgq “ 0, if q ” 1 mod 8,§ d2pτ 2gq “ ρτh20g or 0, if q ” 3 mod 4.
Using Chow-Novikov degree ď 3 part of π˚,˚BPGL,
Proposition (Bachmann-Kong-Wang-X.)
When q ” 3 mod 4, d2pτ 2gq “ 0.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2§ Hoyois-Kelly-Østvær computed the mod 2 Steenrod algebra over Fq,§ Wilson-Østvær computed πn,0 for
#
0 ď n ď 20 if q ” 1 mod 4,0 ď n ď 18 if q ” 3 mod 4.
Proposition (Wilson-Østvær)
§ d2pτgq “ uh20g , if q ” 5 mod 8,§ d2pτgq “ 0, if q ” 1 mod 8,§ d2pτ 2gq “ ρτh20g or 0, if q ” 3 mod 4.
Using Chow-Novikov degree ď 3 part of π˚,˚BPGL,
Proposition (Bachmann-Kong-Wang-X.)
When q ” 3 mod 4, d2pτ 2gq “ 0.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2§ Hoyois-Kelly-Østvær computed the mod 2 Steenrod algebra over Fq,§ Wilson-Østvær computed πn,0 for
#
0 ď n ď 20 if q ” 1 mod 4,0 ď n ď 18 if q ” 3 mod 4.
Proposition (Wilson-Østvær)
§ d2pτgq “ uh20g , if q ” 5 mod 8,§ d2pτgq “ 0, if q ” 1 mod 8,
§ d2pτ 2gq “ ρτh20g or 0, if q ” 3 mod 4.
Using Chow-Novikov degree ď 3 part of π˚,˚BPGL,
Proposition (Bachmann-Kong-Wang-X.)
When q ” 3 mod 4, d2pτ 2gq “ 0.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2§ Hoyois-Kelly-Østvær computed the mod 2 Steenrod algebra over Fq,§ Wilson-Østvær computed πn,0 for
#
0 ď n ď 20 if q ” 1 mod 4,0 ď n ď 18 if q ” 3 mod 4.
Proposition (Wilson-Østvær)
§ d2pτgq “ uh20g , if q ” 5 mod 8,§ d2pτgq “ 0, if q ” 1 mod 8,§ d2pτ 2gq “ ρτh20g or 0, if q ” 3 mod 4.
Using Chow-Novikov degree ď 3 part of π˚,˚BPGL,
Proposition (Bachmann-Kong-Wang-X.)
When q ” 3 mod 4, d2pτ 2gq “ 0.
-
Stable Stems over Fq at p “ 2§ Hoyois-Kelly-Østvær computed the mod 2 Steenrod algebra over Fq,§ Wilson-Østvær computed πn,0 for
#
0 ď n ď 20 if q ” 1 mod 4,0 ď n ď 18 if q ” 3 mod 4.
Proposition (Wilson-Østvær)
§ d2pτgq “ uh20g , if q ” 5 mod 8,§ d2pτgq “ 0, if q ” 1 mod 8,§ d2pτ 2gq “ ρτh20g or 0, if q ” 3 mod 4.
Using Chow-Novikov degree ď 3 part of π˚,˚BPGL,
Proposition (Bachmann-Kong-Wang-X.)
When q ” 3 mod 4, d2pτ 2gq “ 0.
-
Thank you!