Upload File

sss03 mof 03 - world meteorological organization · cvvvv 2008 200 yeosu 200 150 73 e 30 23 e 23...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
28

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 2: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 3: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 4: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 5: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 6: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 7: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 8: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 9: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 10: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 11: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 12: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 13: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 14: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 15: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 16: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 17: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 18: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 19: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 20: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 21: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 22: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 23: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 24: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 25: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 26: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 27: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75
Page 28: SSS03 MOF 03 - World Meteorological Organization · CVVVV 2008 200 Yeosu 200 150 73 E 30 23 E 23 -23 -50 25 RMSE 10.64 8.99 RMSE 15.69 1494 Comparison between and CWW for 1/600 75

Mul$%Scale*Data*Assimila$on*for* Fine%Resolu$on*Models**50 100 150 200 −1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 state distribution (a) obs: rmse=0.150 guess: rmse=0.275 true guess obs 50 100

“Best” permutation for each model type determined by ranking RMSE, variance ratio, bias, and R 2 (Table 5). Arizona favored less complex variable permutations

RMsE Lecture

Picasa - Home - IPHANportal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/atas/19790588reuniaoordinaria12_denovembro.pdf--n,cvvvv L 1/(0 (JIVES c ,Cv-v5v _ou acv a on-am . tv v clpvo e£cu . gun Acv _ LCL,

Quantifying the contribution of glacier runoff to ... contribution... · raw inflow data for all their reservoirs (F. Weber, BC Hydro, personal communication, 2011). The RMSE for

Deep Learning Theory and Practiceweb.cecs.pdx.edu/~willke/courses/510/lectures/lecture1.pdf · The results and aftermath of the Netflix Prize • 10% improvement = RMSE from 0.9525

Optimized DNI forecast using combinations of nowcasting ... · 1 CIEMAT, Madrid , Spain; 2 DLR, Tabernas , Spain, 3 SMHI, Norrköping, Sweden, ... comparisons. RMSE of combined method

Data Mining - Gunadarma Universitylintang.staff.gunadarma.ac.id/Downloads/files/34245/Introduction... · (Akurasi, AUC, RMSE, etc) ... Klastering sering digunakan sebagai tahap awal

Modeling Rehydration Behavior of Dried Figsjast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-804-en.pdf · and aloe vera (Vega-Gálvez et al., ... RMSE/SSE/ 2 and the highest R2 value was ... diameter

Linda Mearns, NCAR Chris Mattmann, JPL Jinwon Kim, UCLA ... › NASA_NCA › internal... · * Metrics calculation: Bias, RMSE, Correlations in conjunction with * Visualization using

Distributed Computing in Finance: Case Model Calibration · β1 0.88268 0.8590 β2 0.014546 0.1690 β∗ 3 2.6581 2.2606 γ 0.7260 κ -0.6270 RMSE in sample 1.0496 0.9835 RMSE out-of

Greeley-Evans School District 6 RMSE Grade 1 RMSE Grade 1 ... · RF 1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words, syllables, and sounds (Phonemes) b. Orally produce single-syllable

s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com...cVVVV 32 . åKikaIs the guw, Love Of 35 . 36 Mew Of 37 . HAWAIIANTRAVELOGUE @LOVELYPEPÅ BY ALEXANDRA PEREIRA HER GET ÕLLECTION LOVÉLYPEPÅ AT HAWAII

Modelagem hidrológica e hidráulica aplicada ao mapeamento ... · RMSE = 1.41 m and CV (RMSE) = 0.04). In urban areas distant from the river, however, flood levels were over-estimated,

NAEFS Upgrade (Version 5) · 2015. 11. 25. · Period: 20150411 - 20150516 . CONUS Statistical Verification again Observation ( T2m) RMSE @ 6 fhr RMSE @ 12 fhr . CONUS Statistical

Pan-Sharpening With a Hyper-Laplacian Penalty · Gaussian, RMSE = 2.385 Laplacian,RMSE=1.58 Hyper−Laplacian,RMSE=0.961 Figure 3. Fitting curves to empirical image gradient data

WG3a-Activities and PT ConSAT - COSMO model · • Spread and RMSE in the 1 h assimilation cycle : improved spread vs. RMSE TBctrl = setup of Bick et al (2016) as reference (no radial

Chapter 1 Introduction - National Chiao Tung University · I CVVVV L =−µ − (2-1) Where Cox is the gate oxide capacitance per unit area, W is channel width, L is channel length,

Predicting Product Sales - Galit Shmueli...MSE 265931.331 MAPE 29.3046096 MAD 459.255529 CFE -17487.9831 MFE -437.199578 TSE -38.0789823 RMSE 515.685302 Holts Winters Smoothing Output

RMSE Standard deviations from a arithmetic mean or RMS deviations reflects uncertainties in experiments. always positive (due to the square). Smaller RMSEs

Aerosol.modelling.aspects:.update. … observations&at&background& airbase stationsin&2014. M86 G14 Average 19.96 19.11 bias N0.32 N1.17 RMSE 7.27 7.06 correlation 0.68 0.72 Atmosphere

RMSE - ijbse.ut.ac.ir

Metrics for Regressors Week 2 Video 4. Metrics for Regressors Linear Correlation MAE/RMSE Information Criteria

A Strategy for Using Bias and RMSE as Outcomes in Monte

NUR FAZIRAH BINTI JUMARI - eprints.utm.myeprints.utm.my/id/eprint/41907/5/NurFazirahJumariMFKK2013.pdfthe lower RMSE for each type of MFI studied. vi ABSTRAK Salah satu cabaran utama

Research Methods...Decision Tree Bayesian & Causality Time Series ALGORITHMS & COMPUTING MLE ITERATIVE (MapReduce & Spark) R SPSS STATISTICS & Visualization RMSE Confusion Matrix ROC

Regression - University of Wisconsin–Madisonpages.cs.wisc.edu/~dpage/cs760/Regression.pdf · • linear regression • RMSE, MAE, and R-square • logistic regression • convex

SPIO - Home of Stability of Lycra... · 2019. 3. 28. · Fig. 4 RMSE results of the upper limbpre andpost lycra soft ortho- Fig. 5 RMSE pesults of the upper limb pre and post Lycra

Objectives Differentiate accuracy, precision, error, and uncertainty. Discuss the dimensions of geographic data quality. Discuss how to compute RMSE for

Overall Statistics RMSE WRF-UA: 159 W m -2 WRF-UCSD: 171 W m -2 STDERR ‘Bias-corrected RMSE’

Assessment of the Gravimetric Method to … Text/vol19/3-Mahdawi.pdfKlute method. Considering calculated logarithmic RMSE between two mentioned methods, it was confirmed the gravimetric

Image Quality Assessment Plug‐in (RMSE and SSIM)kyungs.bol.ucla.edu/software/quality_assessment/quality...3/26/11 1 Image Quality Assessment Plug‐in (RMSE and SSIM) Kyung Sung,

RMS Express – Winlink Global Radio E-Mail System€¦ · § ISNAP V1.0 Incident Snapshot for Counes / Tribal NaAons § RMSE V1.5 Hospital Bed Report (Marion County FL) § RMSE V1.1

Introduction and early results of JRA-55C : subset of JRA ... · FigFFiiggFig....AAAA RMSE RRMMSSEERMSE of ooffof 6 666hrlyhhrrllyyhrly NH NNHHNH geopotentialgeopotential heighthheeiigghhttheight

R2 RMSE=scientificfinding.gau.ac.ir/uploading... · R MAE2 RMSE C&RT_Z C&RT_X C&RT_Y C&RT_D C&RT_ZY C&RT_ZD C&RT_ZXY C&RT_ZXYD C&RT_ZYD C&RT_ZX C&RT_ZXY. RMSE=.1 2. Bostan A. P. and