ssrn-id1884285

Upload: neil-edmondson

Post on 05-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    1/23Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1884285

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    2/23Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1884285

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    3/23Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1884285

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    4/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    5/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    6/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    7/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    8/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    9/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    10/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    11/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    12/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    13/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    14/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    15/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    16/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    17/23

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    18/23

    Figure 1: Patterns of Union Strength

    AustraliaAustria

    Belgium

    Canada

    DenmarkFinland

    France

    Germany

    Greece

    Ireland

    Italy

    Japan

    Netherlands

    New Zealand

    Norway

    Portugal

    Spain

    Sweden

    Switzerland

    United Kingdom

    United States20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 20 40 60 80Union density

    Patterns of Union Power

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    19/23

    Figure 2: Labor Law and Union Strength

    Australia

    Austria

    Belgium

    Canada

    DenmarkFinland

    France

    Germany

    Greece

    Ireland

    Italy

    Japan

    Netherlands

    New Zealand

    Norway

    Portugal

    Spain

    Sweden

    Switzerland

    United Kingdom

    United States

    0

    .5

    1

    1.5

    2

    .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7Collective labor laws index

    Labor Law and Union Strength

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    20/23

    Figure 3: Labor Law and Excess Coverage

    Australia

    Austria

    Belgium

    Canada

    Denmark

    Finland

    France

    Germany

    Italy

    Japan

    Netherlands

    Norway

    Portugal

    Spain

    Sweden

    Switzerland

    United Kingdom

    United States0

    20

    40

    6

    0

    80

    .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7index_industrial4a

    Fitted values excov

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    21/23

    Bivariate

    Correlations Ghent Wage Coordination Extension Works Council Union Power Hold Up

    Ghent 1.000

    Wage Coordination 0.2630 1.0000

    Extension -0.0892 0.3269 1.0000

    Works Council -0.2293 0.2632 0.7480 1.0000

    Union Power -0.1848 0.1226 0.2475 0.1217 1.0000Hold Up -0.5438 -0.3053 -0.1834 -0.0702 -0.2776 1.0000

    Table 1: Bivariate Correlation Matrix

    Table 2: Descriptive Labor Law Statistics

    Extension Works Council Union Power Hold Up

    HDHC countries

    Belgium 1 1 0.25 0.5

    Denmark 0 0 0.25 0.25Finland 1 0 0.25 0

    Norway 0 0 0.5 0.5

    Sweden 0 0 0.5 0.25

    HDHC Mean 0.4 0.2 0.35 0.3

    LDHC countries

    Australia 1 0 0.75 0.5

    Austria 1 1 0 0.75

    France 1 1 0.5 1

    Germany 1 1 0.25 0.5

    Greece 1 1 0.5 0.25

    Italy 0 0 0.5 1

    Netherlands 1 1 0.5 0.5

    Portugal 1 1 0.75 0.25

    Spain 1 1 0.75 0.25

    LDHC Mean 0.89 0.78 0.5 0.56

    LDLC countriesCanada 0 0 0.5 0.25

    Ireland 0 0 0.25 0.75

    Japan 0 0 0.5 0.5

    New Zealand 0 0 0.25 0.75

    Switzerland 1 0 0.5 0.75

    United Kingdom 0 0 0 0.75

    United States 0 0 0.25 0.75

    LDLC Mean 0.14 0 0.32 0.64

    Overall Mean (s.d.) 0.52 (0.51) 0.38 (0.50) 0.40 (0.22) 0.52 (0.27)

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    22/23

    OLS Density Controls Labor Law Combined Reduced (Extension) Reduced (WC)

    Ghent system 48.7***

    (7.8)

    40.0***

    (5.1)

    46.1***

    (8.1)

    44.8***

    (7.3)

    Wage coordination 16.5(1.6)

    26.5**(2.5)

    25.0**(2.5)

    23.5**(2.3)

    Extension 0.0(0.0)

    -6.0(-1.0)

    -9.7**(-2.3)

    Works council -13.5(-1.2)

    -5.0(-0.8)

    -8.9*(-2.0)

    Union power -38.2*

    (-2.1)

    -13.9

    (-1.3)

    Hold up -48.1***

    (-3.3)

    -8.0

    (-0.8)

    Adj. R-squared 0.79 0.38 0.82 0.82 0.83

    N. obs. 21 21 21 21 21

    Table 3: OLS Union Density, t-scores in parentheses

    OLS Coverage Controls Labor Law Combined Reduced (Extension) Reduced (WC)Ghent system 21.42

    (1.44)

    55.80***

    (3.93)

    48.81***

    (3.33)

    59.20***

    (4.41)

    Wage coordination 41.29

    (1.66)

    11.04

    (0.59)

    Extension 15.89

    (1.01)

    9.99

    (0.88)

    30.07***

    (3.62)

    Works council 13.01

    (0.83)

    25.82**

    (2.21)

    35.02***

    (4.63)

    Union power 16.12

    (0.64)

    49.66**

    (2.50)

    42.29*

    (1.96)

    54.90***

    (2.91)

    Hold up -13.75

    (-0.69)

    36.56*

    (1.98)

    30.75

    (1.52)

    35.22*

    (1.96)

    Adj. R-squared 0.18 0.22 0.61 0.63 0.52

    N. obs. 21 21 21 21 21

    Table 4: OLS Union Coverage, t-scores in parentheses

    OLS E/R Density Controls Labor Law Combined Reduced (Extension) Reduced

    (WC*Hold Up)

    Ghent system -12.23(-0.72)

    9.37(0.45)

    Wage coordination 28.00

    (1.69)

    31.58

    (1.17)

    36.35

    (1.44)

    32.64

    (1.43)

    Extension 19.68(1.24)

    15.92(0.98)

    24.82**(2.33)

    Works council 16.17

    (0.99)

    16.99

    (1.01)

    Union power -24.74

    (-0.96)

    -18.69

    (-0.66)

    Hold up 18.96(0.92)

    34.03(1.23)

    33.81(1.70)

    WC*Hold up 49.07***(2.93)

    Adj. R-squared 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.30 0.35

    N. obs. 20 20 20 20 20

    Table 5: OLS Employer Density, t-scores in parentheses

  • 7/31/2019 SSRN-id1884285

    23/23

    GLM Density Controls Labor Law Combined Reduced (Extension) Reduced (WC)

    Ghent system 2.1416***

    (11.62)

    1.6984***

    (4.73)

    1.9937***

    (8.86)

    1.8833***

    (7.26)

    Wage coordination 0.8433

    (1.51)

    1.3350*

    (1.83)

    1.2931*

    (1.80)

    1.2998*

    (1.84)

    Extension -0.0046

    (-0.01)

    -0.2891

    (-1.07)

    -0.4544*

    (-1.73)

    Works council -0.6364***

    (-3.26)

    -0.2812

    (-1.31)

    -0.4542*

    (-1.82)

    Union power -1.8505***

    (-2.87)

    -0.7841**

    (-2.13)

    -0.4864

    (-1.44)

    -0.6706**

    (-2.44)

    Hold up -2.3616***

    (-3.43)

    -0.4770

    (-1.09)

    AIC 1.0787 1.3182 1.4453 1.2573 1.2578

    N. obs. 21 21 21 21 21

    Table A1: GLM Union Density, t-scores in parentheses

    GLM Coverage Controls Labor Law Combined Reduced (Extension) Reduced (WC)

    Ghent system 1.2402***

    (2.78)

    3.0588***

    (5.28)

    2.4826***

    (3.52)

    3.2315***

    (6.69)

    Wage coordination 1.7365(1.26)

    0.2767(0.25)

    Extension 0.6356

    (1.17)

    0.3100

    (0.65)

    1.4190***

    (3.52)

    Works council 0.7394

    (1.75)

    1.4982***

    (3.74)

    1.7984***

    (5.82)

    Union power 0.8839

    (0.98)

    2.6419***

    (3.70)

    1.9419**

    (2.18)

    2.9021***

    (3.86)

    Hold up -0.6733

    (-0.69)

    2.0704***

    (2.65)

    1.4750

    (1.43)

    2.1186***

    (3.06)

    AIC 1.1849 1.3438 1.4281 1.2732 1.2403

    N. obs. 21 21 21 21 21

    Table A2: GLM Union Coverage, t-scores in parentheses

    GLM E/R Density Controls Labor Law Combined Reduced (Extension) Reduced (WC)

    Ghent system -0.5031

    (-1.28)

    0.4478

    (0.88)

    Wage coordination 1.9820

    (1.33)

    1.5474

    (1.45)

    1.637062

    (1.38)

    1.3550

    (1.08)

    Extension 0.8507

    (1.37)

    0.7160

    (1.08)

    1.0660***

    (2.78)

    Works council 0.7273

    (1.23)

    0.7953

    (1.11)

    Union power -1.1676

    (-1.41)

    -1.0136

    (-1.08)

    Hold up 0.8554

    (1.29)

    1.6180**

    (2.19)

    1.5155**

    (2.04)

    WC*Hold up 2.2650***

    (3.83)

    AIC 1.2934 1.4131 1.5869 1.3155 1.2123

    N. obs. 20 20 20 20 20

    Table A3: GLM Employer Density, t-scores in parentheses