sreekanth r, rangarajan s, anand g -system simulation€¦ · driveline optimization 3- fe...
TRANSCRIPT
PWT CAE| System Simulation GT-SUITE User Conference | Jan 15, 2018
Passenger Car baseline Fuel Economy Validation with Test data on IDC & FE Improvement
Strategies Prediction to improve CAFE Ratings
Sreekanth R, Rangarajan S, Anand G
-System Simulation
| 2
CONTENTSOutcome of the Seminar
1. Modelling & Validation of FE on Indian Driving Cycle in GT-SUITE.
2. Modelling FE improvement ideas using GT-SUITE as POC.
FE Challenges for Automotive
Industry
FEBaseline validation on Indian Driving
Cycle(IDC)
Component level FE ideas
1. Driveline optimization
2.Drag Coefficient & LOW RRC Tires
ECU control logic FE ideas
1. Stop-Start
2. Power-Eco mode
Summary, Conclusions
and
Future Scope
| 3
Contents
Introduction
Baseline Fuel Economy validation on IDC
FE improvement ideas
Summary & Conclusions
Challenges & Future scope
| 4
How to balance them..??
Background- FE Challenges
1- INTRODUCTION
| 5
Vehicle FE improvement concept freeze
Challenges in Real World Testing Benefits with 1D GT-SUITE Simulation
Challenges and Motivation
• Vehicle performance evaluation
• Modeling using simulation tools in upstream development stages (Limited/no test data)
• Prototyping & final test
.
1- INTRODUCTION
• Prototype
• Cost involved
• Vehicle test facility
• Complexity
• No Prototype
• Less Cost
• Less efforts
• Good accuracy withRepeatability
detailed physics of
system to be modeled !!
| 6
Physical Layout-Chassis Dyno Simulation Layout in GT-SUITE
Deliverables
1D GT-SUITE vehicle model
1- INTRODUCTION
FE Improvement
• Transmission Optimization
• Drag Coefficient & Low RRC Tires
• Start-Stop
• Power-Eco Modes
FE Validation
• Vehicle Modelling
• FE Validation on IDC
| 7
Simulation Steps
1- INTRODUCTION
Co
mp
on
en
t
Le
ve
l
Co
mp
oe
nt
Le
ve
l
imp
rove
me
nt
Sys
tem
Le
ve
l
PO
C v
alid
ati
on
Modeling & System Integration
• Drive model
• Engine, ECU (Simple / Detailed
FRM), Fuel Cut off logic.
• Transmission, TCU
• Carbody
Driving Cycle
• Fuel Economy simulation on
IDC
FE improvement
• Component level improvement
• ECU logic improvement
Driving Cycle
• IDC
• Real World Driving Cycle/
Customer driving cycle
Component
System Level
Control Logic
Validation
IDC (Indian Driving Cycle)
• Vehicle speed & gear position target as timeprofile.
• Drive model: Speed target PID.
• Engine: Map based model with EngineBSFC map.
• Transmission: 6 speed MT gear box & FDR.
• Drag coefficient and Tire rolling resistancetarget data.
• Stop-Start logic and Power-Eco modeaccelerator pedal map scaling.
• FE validation of baseline
• Validation of Stop-Start and Power Ecomode POC with real world FE improvementdata from OEMs(Open claims/resources)
| 8
Baseline FE validation on IDC
2- Baseline FE validation on IDC
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Veh
icle
sp
eed
(Km
ph
)
Time(sec)
Indian Driving Cycle(IDC Cycle)
Vehicle Speed(Kmph) Gear(-)
Gear(-)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Engin
e s
peed(R
PM
)
Time(sec)
Engine speed_IDC Cycle
Baseline configuration
IDC Cycle data:
Engine speed:
3500
| 9
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Fuel
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n(g
ram
s)
Time(sec)
Baseline cumulative fuel consumption
Baseline
Baseline model Fuel Consumption-Simulation:
2- Baseline FE validation on IDC
700
Baseline FE validation on IDC
Test(Chassis Dyno) Simulation
Fuel E
conom
y(K
mpl)
15
23
-2.4%
Baseline FE Validation:
| 10
Driveline optimization
3- FE improvement POC 1
Driveline optimization:
Engine speed comparison:
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Engin
e s
peed(R
PM
)
Time(sec)
Engine speed comparison
Baseline configuration Optimized configuration
30
03500
0 6000
20
Driveline inputs in GT-SUITE:
| 11
Base line simulationDriveline optimization
Fuel Consumption comparison:
FE improvement:
Cumulative Fuel Flow
Baseline Driveline Optimization
3- FE improvement POC 1
Fuel C
onsum
ption(g
ram
s)
Time (s)0
700
1200
Driveline optimization
Fuel E
conom
y(K
mpl)
15
23
+3 %
| 12
Factors impacting Air drag:
3- FE improvement POC 2
Note: CAR model only for representation
Drag inputs in GT-SUITE:
Air drag reduction
| 13
Fuel Consumption comparison:
Cumulative Fuel Flow
Baseline Aerodynamic drag reduction
3- FE improvement POC 2
Fuel C
onsum
ption(g
ram
s)
Time (s)
700
0 1200
Air drag reduction
15
23
Base line simulationAir drag reduction
FE improvement:
Fuel E
conom
y(K
mpl)
+3 %
15
23
| 14
Low RRC Tires + Tire pressure up
Factors impacting Tire rolling resistance:
construction
Tire Pressure
Tire Size
Pattern
3- FE improvement POC 3
Tire model inputs in GT-SUITE:
| 15
Fuel Consumption comparison:
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Fuel
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n(g
ram
s)
Time(sec)
Cumulative Fuel Flow
Baseline Low RRC Tires
3- FE improvement POC 3
700
Low RRC Tires
Base line simulation
Low RRC tires + Tire pressure UpFE improvement:
Fuel E
conom
y(K
mpl)
15
23
+7 %
| 16
Stop-Start System
Start-Stop control modelled in GT-SUITE:
• Vehicle speed= 0 Kmph &
• Engine speed = Idle speed &
• Driver accelerator demand = 0 % &
• Coolant temperature > ex: 35 deg.C
Traffic
condition
Engine
Stop-Start
Selection
Stop-Start
Control in
GT-SUITE
4- FE improvement POC 4
Stop-Start in GT-SUITE:
| 17
Fuel Consumption comparison:
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Fuel
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n(g
ram
s)
Time(sec)
Cumulative Fuel Flow
Baseline Start-Stop System
4- FE improvement POC 4
700
Stop-Start System
Base line simulation
Stop-Start
Fuel E
conom
y(K
mpl)
15
23
+6.7 %
FE improvement:
| 18
Power-Eco Mode:
POWER-ECO Mode modelled in GT-SUITE:
facilitates driver to select between the 2 modes “Power” and “ECO”.
ECO mode provides better fuel economy by limiting the maximum
Torque cure.
Simulation Carried on Real
World Driving cycle
4- FE improvement POC 5
Pedal Map in GT-SUITE:
Note: While using RWDC with ECO-Mode, the zones with high vehicle
acceleration are not followed by simulation vehicle due to low max. torque in
ECO mode.
| 19
Fuel Consumption comparison on Real World Driving Cycle:
4- FE improvement POC 5
0
30
20
0 6000
Power-Eco Mode:
Base line simulation
Eco mode
Fuel E
conom
y(K
mpl)
15
23
+6.3 %
FE improvement:
| 20
ECO MODE
W.r.to Base
Driver aggressiveness monitoring
systems are being implemented
Base
+3%
+6%
FE Summary & Conclusions for IDC & Real World Drive Cycle
5- Summary
+7%
W.r.to BaseSTART-STOP
FE improvement varies based on Drive
Cycle Conditions. Technologies to gain
FE without compromise in cabin comfort
are in development
+3%AERO-KIT
W.r.to Base
Low drag vehicle designs are being
developed
Ex: eliminating ORVMs, Plasma
aerodynamics
+3%
W.r.to Base
DRIVELINE OPTIMIZATION
AT, CVT, DCT Drivelines
W.r.to Base
LOW RRC TIRES + Tire
pressure up
Low weight tires, Advanced material are
the future
+7%
+6%
IDC cycle
IDC cycle
IDC cycle
IDC cycle
Real World Cycle
| 21
Challenges in FE improvement ideas
Aero dynamic drag
•Reducing air drag will affect the air flow in frontal area and leads to lesser cooling efficiency in Radiator and intercooler etc.
•Reducing the height and width of the car will reduce the frontal area which will reduce the drag force. But which will make uncomforatability of passengers seating.
Lower Rolling
resistance•Reduced traction effect (Braking distance/Skidding)during rain or wet climatic condition .
•Poor Stability/rattling noise in High speeds.
Eco modes & Engine
start/stop •Eco mode:
•Lower performance feel.
•Engine start/stop:
•Impact on starter motor life.
•Passenger’s discomfortness due HVAC cut off.
Poor Stability & more braking
distance
Air flow
Engine start/stop
5- Summary
| 22
Future scope
Integration of lubrication, ETM, HVAC and Vehicle cooling
Advanced engine technologies & Co-Simulation
Hybrid powertrain configurations
Efficient thermal and waste heat management
Energy synthesis and optimization
5- Summary
| 23
Acknowledgments
Dan Marsh, P.Dimitrakopoulos & Jonathan Zeman - Gamma Technologies, USA. Amit Patankar & Sandeep Jain – ESI Group, India. Vinayaga Moorthy –DGM, Powertrain CAE, RNTBCI, Chennai, India.
| 24
Thank You