µsr of free radicals - triumf.info · un accélérateur de la démarche scientifique canadienne...
TRANSCRIPT
Owned and operated as a joint venture by a consortium of Canadian universities via a contribution through the National Research Council Canada Propriété d’un consortium d’universités canadiennes, géré en co-entreprise à partir d’une contribution administrée par le Conseil national de recherches Canada
Canada’s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics Laboratoire national canadien pour la recherche en physique nucléaire
et en physique des particules
Accelerating Science for Canada Un accélérateur de la démarche scientifique canadienne
µSR of Free Radicals
Iain McKenzie | CMMS | TRIUMF
What is a Radical?
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 2
• Radicals are atoms or molecules with one or more unpaired electrons.
What is a Radical?
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 3
7 valence electrons
(2 from each bond and
1 unpaired electron) C CH3CH3C
Mu
H H
• Radicals are often highly reactive as it is usually energetically favorable for them to attain “closed shell configuration”
reactants! intermediates[ ]! products
• Through a better understanding of the properties of the intermediates, we can better control chemical reactions
Why Study Radicals?
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 4
radicals carbenes
carbocations carbanions
• Production of radicals often requires nasty mix of chemicals (e.g. Fenton’s reagent) and/or irradiation.
• Reactive radicals are difficult to study with traditional spectroscopic techniques (EPR, UV-Vis, IR)
Difficulties in Studying Radicals
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 5
Signal ~ [R!]
R! + R! R!R Termination reaction
R! R!
Matrix Isolation Spin Trapping
R! R
• Radicals produced by addition of Mu to an unsaturated bond
Muoniated Radicals
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 6
• Extremely dilute (no self termination reactions) • Distribution of radicals depends on relative addition rates
– Mu adds preferentially to less substituted end of C=C bond – Addition to isolated C=C bond faster than addition to phenyl ring – Addition to C=C ~100x faster than to C=O
C CH2
H3C
H3C
C CH3CH3C
Mu
H H
Mu
• Electron has a spin of 1/2
Hfccs and Spin Density
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 7
!
" :ms = +1 2
# :ms = $1 2
!
"! r ( ) = "#
! r ( ) + "$ ! r ( )
!
"SPIN ! r ( ) = "#! r ( ) $ "% ! r ( )
Electron density Spin density
• The hfcc is directly proportional to the unpaired spin density at the nucleus
!
AX =2µ03h
geµB gXµX"
# $ %
& ' (SPIN ! r = 0( )
Electron and Spin Density in C6H6Mu
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 8
Blue: "# > "$ Positive spin density
Green: "# < "$ Negative spin density
Electron density Spin density
• AX is the strength of the interaction between the spin of the electron and the magnetic dipole of the nucleus X
• Muon and nuclear hfccs provide information about the structure, configuration and conformation of the radical
Hyperfine Coupling Constants
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 9
C CH
H
H
HMu + C C
Mu
HHH
H
Aµ Ap
(1)
Ap (2)
!-protons
"-protons
AX= AX(isotropic) + AX
(dipole)
"-muon
Transverse Field Muon Spin Rotation
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 10
µ+#
Sample
Positron Detector
Spin-polarized
muon beam
B
e+
Muon Detector
Electronic Clock
Transverse Field Muon Spin Rotation
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 11
$12
Diamagnetic frequency $D
$43
Aµ
CD2Mu
!
"D = #µB
!
Aµ(MHz) = "43 # "12
Transverse Field Muon Spin Rotation
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 12
!
"R = "µ ± 12 Aµ
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
!R1
Energy
B/Aµ
!R2
e--µ+-p+
• Requires high concentration (~1 M) of precursor to prevent loss of polarization.
Limitations of TF-µSR
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 13
P12R ! 1
2 hM! 2
! 2 +""122
#
$%
&
'(
1/2
• hM is the initial fraction of muon polarization in Mu
• ! is the first-order reaction rate • %&12 is the change in
precession frequency between Mu and the radical
• You can’t tell the muon where to go i.e. multiple muoniated radicals are formed, often ones you don’t want
-0.004
-0.003
-0.002
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950
Magnetic Field / Gauss
RF A
sym
metr
y
Radio Frequency Muon Spin Resonance
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 14
Bres
!
"RF = #µBres $12 Aµ
• Measure Aµ for slowly formed radicals (slow Mu addition or dilute solutions)
$RF = 10 MHz H3C
C
H3C
OMu
Level Crossing Resonance
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 15
µ+#Sample
Forward Positron Detector
Backward Positron Detector
Spin-polarized muon beam
e+
B
Time integrated asymmetry
A = NF ! NB
NF + NB
Level Crossing Resonance
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 16
!1 Resonance !
0 Resonance
!
Bres"0 =
12
Aµ # Ak$µ # $k( )
#Aµ + Ak$e
%
& ' '
(
) * *
!
Bres"1 =
Aµ
2#µ
$Aµ
2#e
Pol
ariz
atio
n E
nerg
y
Magnetic Field
muon-proton spin flip-flip !M = 2
muon-proton spin flip-flop !M = 0
muon spin flip !M = 1
!
"e"µ"p
!
"e"µ#p
!
"e#µ"p
!
"e#µ#p
ALC-µSR of Mu13C60
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 17
Percival et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 245, 90
Identification of Muoniated Radicals
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 18
TF-µSR Precession frequencies
RF-µSR Resonance field
ALC-µSR Resonance fields
Hyperfine Coupling Constants
Temperature Dependence of HFCs
Muon hfc (Aµ)
Distribution of unpaired electron
Nuclear hfcs (H, D, 13C, 14N'.)
Configuration and conformation Intramolecular motion
Solid
• # carbon: nucleus with significant unpaired electron spin density
• # proton: attached to an # carbon
• $ carbon: one removed from # carbon
• $ proton: attached to an $ carbon
• ( carbon: one removed from $ carbon
• ''''.
Nomenclature
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 19
More probable
Hyperfine Coupling of !-Nuclei
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 20
(a)! (b)!
C H H H C H H
H
• #-nuclei lie in nodal plane but have negative spin density due to spin polarization of the bond
!
AX =QX"#
• ") is the )-electron population at the adjacent carbon atom
• Qp ~ -75 MHz
McConnell equation
for #-nuclei
Muoniated Cyclohexadienyl Radical
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 21
H
H H
H H
Mu
H
Para (1H #) Ap = -36.8 MHz " ~ +0.49
Meta (2H #) Ap = +7.5 MHz " ~ -0.10
Ortho (2H #) Ap = -25.5 MHz " ~ +0.35
Methylene (1H $) Ap = 125 MHz
Muon ($) Aµ = 514.6 MHz
Spin density around ring 2(0.35)+2(-0.10)+1(0.49)
~1
Out-of-plane Vibrations of !-Protons
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 22
• Out-of-plane vibrations cause the magnitude of # proton hfccs to decrease
• Direct overlap of nuclei with SOMO gives positive spin density contribution than partially counteracts negative spin density due to spin polarization
AX T( ) !AX!e"E! /kBT
!=0
#
$e"E! /kBT
!=0
#
$
Hyperfine Coupling of "-Nuclei
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 23
• L: orientation independent mechanisms (~0 – 10 MHz)
• M: spin density arising from hyperconjugation (~140 MHz)
• * is the angle between C-X bond and SOMO
• ") is the spin density on adjacent carbon
RC
HH
H
R
!"
More overlap with
SOMO
Less overlap with
SOMO
!
Ap" = L +M cos2 #[ ]$%
• The preferred configuration of the radical can be determined from measuring the magnitude and temperature dependence of the hfcc.
Pseudo-Methyl Groups
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 24
R RC
R1
R2R3R RC
R1
R2
R3
AR1= L +M( )!"
AR2 (3)= L + 1
4M( )!"
AR1(2 )= L + 3
4M( )!"
AR3= L!"
dAR1
dT< 0
dAR2 (3)
dT> 0
dAR1(2 )
dT< 0
dAR3
dT> 0
Freely rotating: AR = L + 12M( )!"
Temperature Dependence of " Hfccs
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 25
!
" A µ
!
ApCH2!
A CH2Mu = 13 " A µ + 2
3 ApCH2
• C-Mu bond preferentially aligns with SOMO
Methylene Groups in C6H6Mu
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 26
• Hfccs depend on spin density on both adjacent carbons • Methylene (CHMu) group not free to rotate • Reduction of $ hfccs due to scissor motion of CHMu
group (slightly increases *)
Ap! = L +M cos2"!" #$ #C1
$ + #C5$( )
2
• Asymmetric bond stretching potential results in C-Mu bond being longer than C-H bond.
• Hfcc becomes increasingly positive with increasing bond length (although |Aµ| decreases if Aµ is negative).
Isotope Effects on Bond Length
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 27
rC-Mu + 1.049 rC-H
13C Hfccs
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 28
Ci H C Ci Cj Ci Cj
!," spin polarization
Karplus Fraenkel equation for planar
radicals
!
aCi= SCi + QCX
X
j=1
3
"#
$ % %
&
' ( ( )Ci
+ QXCC )C j
j=1
3
"
!
SCi = -12.7 G
= +19.5 G
!
QCHC
!
QCiC j
C = +14.4 G
!
QC jCi
C = -13.9 G
• µSR spectra do not give direct access to the radical structure. This must be inferred.
• Magnetic properties of a radical often depend on the subtle interplay of several different effects.(e.g. vibrational averaging, solvent effects, substituent effects'.)
• Quantum calculations are used to – support and compliment the experimental results to determine
the electronic and geometric structure of the radical starting from its spectral properties
– evaluate the role of different effects on determining the magnetic properties of a radical
Quantum Calculations
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 29
• Use unrestricted method (treats # and $ electrons separately) to correctly account for spin polarization.
• Density functional methods (such as B3LYP) give isotropic hfcc that are in good agreement with experimental values and are practical for larger radicals.
• The larger the basis set, the more accurate the wavefunction but the computational time is much longer
• Benchmark your calculations against closely related known systems
Ab Initio Calculations
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 30
• How do stable carbenes react with a simple free radical?
Mu Adducts of Carbenes
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 31
Aµ 278.8 MHz
AC(C2) 136.0 MHz
AN(N1) 8.3 MHz
AN(N3) 8.3 MHz
Ap(CH3C5) -
Aµ 401.0 MHz
AC(C2) 7.4 MHz
AN(N1) 0.5 MHz
AN(N3) 4.0 MHz
Ap(CH3C5) 53.1 MHz
B3LYP/6-311G**//B3LYP/EPR-III
Mu Adducts of Carbenes
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 32
• Structure assigned by comparing hfccs with DFT calculations of possible radicals.
0 100 200 300 400
Frequency / MHz
Fourier
Pow
er
D
R
R
Aµ = 246.4 MHz
8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.0 9.1
Magnetic Field / kG
A+ -
A–
AN = 13.7 MHz
3.1 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.1 5.5
Magnetic Field / kG
A+ -
A–
AC = 139.6 MHz
Delocalized electron
Dipolar Coupling
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 33
B || z
*
B || z
*
r
• Judge whether the unpaired electron is mostly in the positive or the negative sector of a double cone with opening angle * = 54.7°
Point dipole
3cos2! !1r3
3cos2! !1r3
Dipolar Coupling of !-Nuclei
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 34
Dipolar Coupling of "-Nuclei
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 35
• Hyperfine tensor can be represented as an ellipsoid
• Dipolar coupling is traceless
Motional Averaging
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 36
!
Bxx + Byy + Bzz = 0
ALC Lineshapes
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 37
!
P z B,"( ) = 1#0.5q2Pz
0
$ 2%( )2 + q2 + &µ2 B # Bres
'1( )2
!
P z B( ) = P z B,"( )0
#
$ f "( )2# sin"d"
q = ! 34Dµ|| sin! cos!
Dµ: magnitude of dipolar hfcc *: angle between unique axis and magnetic field.
Powder %1 shape obtained by integrating over all * and weighting by probability f(*).
Bres!1 =
12!µ
"12!e
#
$%%
&
'(( Aµ
iso + 12 Dµ
|| 3cos2" "1( ))*
+,
Motional Averaging of C6H6Mu
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 38
Byy + 0 Bxx = 8.6 MHz Bzz = - 8.6 MHz
Bzz Bxx
Byy
!
Dµ"
!
Dµ"
!
Dµ||
!
Dµ"
!
Dµ"
!
Dµ||
Dµ|| = -6.8 MHz
Dµ|| = +5.8 MHz
ALC Lineshapes
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 39
17000 18000 19000 20000 21000 22000
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
Polarization
Magnetic Field / G17000 18000 19000 20000 21000 22000
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
Polarization
Magnetic Field / G
Dynamics of Muoniated Norbornyl Radical
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 40
• Asymmetric shape indicates Dµ
|| < 0 • Preferred rotation around indicated axis. • Decreasing |Dµ
||| with increasing temperature due to wobbling of rotation axis.
303 K
234 K
183 K
173 K
Calculated Aμ Exp. Aμ
1 618 235.4
2 764 154.9
Organosilicon Radicals
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 41
1
2
Difference between calculated and experimental Aµ values means these are not the radicals are formed.
• Observation of secondary radical formed by radical addition to silylene
• Confirmed by observing products of equimolar 1 and 2
Organosilicon Radicals
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 42
Organometallic Radicals
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 43
• How does H/Mu react with ferrocene?
Fe Fe FeMuH
Mu
FeMu
H
Mu
endo exo
Cp Adducts 17 electrons
Ferrocene Fe Adduct 19 electrons
• What are the structures of the resulting radicals?
ALC-µSR of Ferrocene
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-6
-4
-2
0
10 K 25 K 37 K 50 K 62 K 75 K
Cor
rect
ed In
tegr
al A
sym
met
ry /
%
Magnetic Field / T
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 44
%1 Resonance 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
230
235
240
245
250
0 20 40 60 80 1000.2
0.3
0.4
Am
plitu
de /
a.u.
|Aµ| /
MH
zTemperature / K
FWH
M /
T
Temperature / K
Aµ0 = 250.5±0.6 MHz
Aµ1 = 126±13 MHz
%E = 1.4±0.1 kJ mol-1
ALC-µSR of Ferrocene
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 45
0 2 4 6 88
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Asy
mm
etry
/ %
Time / µs
10 K 37 K 50 K 75 K 100 K
(a) (b)
! µ / µs-1
Temperature / K
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
230
235
240
245
250
0 20 40 60 80 1000.2
0.3
0.4
Am
plitu
de /
a.u.
|Aµ| /
MH
z
Temperature / K
FWH
M /
T
Temperature / K
,e and ,µ increasing with temperature
Chemical reaction?
DFT Calculations of Mu Adducts of Ferrocene
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 46
UB3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)
more stable by 79.8 kJ mol-1
R. M. Macrae, Physica B 374-375, 307 (2006)
Aµexo
21 MHz
Aµendo
-3 MHz AµFe
-304 MHz
Reaction of Mu with Aromatic Compounds
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 47
No addition at tertiary carbons*
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
Mu
H
CH3
CH3
Mu
Mu
Mu
HMu
H
Mu
H
Mu
HMu H
Brodovitch et al. Can. J. Chem. 81, 1 (2003)
Strained Aromatic Compounds
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 48
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
Mu
Mu
H
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H
Mu
Mu
[2.2]paracyclophane
exo endo bridge
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
Mu
Mu
H
H2C CH2
H2C CH2
H
Mu
Mu
12.6o
ALC-µSR of [2.2]Paracyclophane
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 49
0.6 0.8 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
Cor
rect
ed A
sym
met
ry /
%
Magnetic Field / T
%1 Endo
%1 Bridge
%1 Exo
Exo Aµ = 530.9 MHz %1 = 1.95 T 67±1 % Endo Aµ = 169.9 MHz %1 = 0.62 T 22±1 % Bridge Aµ = 469.0 MHz %1 = 1.72 T 11±1 %
UB3LYP/6-311G(d,p)//UPBE0/EPR-II
• µSR is a powerful technique for characterizing free radicals in the solid, liquid or gas phases
References • E. Roduner, Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 337 (1993) • C. J. Rhodes, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1379
(2002) • I. McKenzie and E. Roduner, Naturwissenschaften 96,
873 (2009)
Conclusions and References
August 16, 2011 µSR of Free Radicals 50