BfatmM–atdasdsdi.ParEupsc

Brexit andaced by thhe Europe

member staMultiannua– both withas to the ao the EU

divisions and “net restates will differencessimple “ndivision. T.e., the

Poland andand Romanreferred to European, ountil now, mprotection structural common ag

EU –

d the eve Europea

ean Union ates to refl Financial

h regard to mounts of

U’s prioritbetween “

ecipients” amost like

s might gonet paye

The VisegrCzech R

d Slovakia, nia (in thi

as the Cor CEE, memainly ass

of the funds and

gricultural

Sbudcons

volving chn Union arand the reform the ul Framewoits source

f money chties. The “net contamong thely deepen,o further r”-“net r

rad countrepublic, as well ass text, coentral andember statociated witamounts

d monies policy. Yet

Squadget side

Poli

Agni

hallenges re forcing est of the upcoming ork (MFF) es as well hannelled

existing ributors”

e member , but the than the

recipient” ries (V4), Hungary, Bulgaria

ollectively d Eastern es) were, th strong

of the for the

t now,

Policy

aringnegoring

cyBri

ieszka Ład

awsucotein redecococotrewireshwobeof incwotare

y Brief | 01

g theotiatCEE

ef

a

ware of tupport the osts for arrorism or

the worlgion is st

evelopmentountries caohesion poountries weatment oith their pduction in

hifting the ould certaieing left bef the rest crease in tould, in ilwind for gion.

.2018

e cirions

E pe

the new necessity

activities sstrengthend. At the till struggt. That isll for furthe

olicy, and would likeof their coeers in W

n this supfunds to

inly bring ehind and

of Europehe existingthe long populist f

rcle?afte

rspe

challengesof incurrinsuch as ning the E

e same timgling with s why ther financina majority

e to seeountries’

Western Euport in fa

o new chaabout feebeyond the, and cag differenc

run, proforces in t

? er Brective

s, they ng more fighting U’s role me, the weaker

he CEE ng of the y of the e equal farmers rope. A vour of

allenges lings of

he reach ause an es. This

ovide a he CEE

exit es

TupthHRfotodbCwwdDdbpaaaa

Cc

Tcfu2

Te

Sh

*tathp

The aim ofupcoming perspective he challeng

Hungary, PRomania wifollow. As tho begin, the

descriptionsbody of theCEE’s viewwritten non-with civil sedescribed December discussing obeginning, presented, fat the opiagricultural, and securityare formulat

Current beconcerning

Today, the countries arunds. Their

2016 fell be

Table 1: EUexpenditure

Source: http://ec.europa.e

The numbersaken into conshey depend

projects’ implem

f this papeMFF negof the CE

ges that thPoland, Sloill face and he negotiate analysis w

s and initial e text is a

ws based -papers aservants an

countries2017-Janu

or commensome gen

followed by inions on

cohesion y policies. ted at the en

nefits andg the MFF

Central andre net recipr operating between 6.9

U and selecand

eu/budget/figure

s given are fosideration thatfrom the pa

mentation.

er is to anotiations f

EE region, he Czech vakia, Bulgpriorities th

tions are owill focus opositions.

a descriptioon the an

s well on ind experts s, conducuary 2018,nting on theneral posita more detthe futureas well asShort commnd of the te

d future ch

d Eastern pients of Ebudgetary band 0.5 bil

cted membrevenue

es/interactive/ind

for 2016. It nt they differ evayments’ tim

alyse the from the including Republic,

garia and hey might

only about n general The main

on of the nalysis of interviews from the

cted in , without

em. At the tions are tailed look e of the s external mentaries xt.

hallenges

European U budget

balance in lion euro.

ber states’ 2016

dex_en.cfm

eeds to be very year as

metable and

In larrecanagcoin co42FigfunSt

Soinveperhttppol

2014 - 2rgest absoceiving 82.5

nd 32.1 bgricultural ohesion poli

the years ountries was2.5% (Czechgure 1: Pending in putate 2015-20

urce: Percentavestment per Mer Member ps://cohesiondalicy-funding-in-p

Squaring

020, as tholute net 5 billion eurbillion euro

policy. Thcy funding i2015-2017 s between h Republic)ercentage oublic invest017

age of cohesember State. BaState to puta.ec.europa.euublic-investmen

the circle?

he country income, P

ro for coheso for the he percenin public inv in the six 61.2% (Po

). of cohesiotment per

sion policy fuased on Share oublic investmeu/Country-Level/nt-p/7bw6-2dw3/

| page 2

with the Poland is sion policy

common ntage of vestments

analysed land) and

n policy Member

unding in pubof Cohesion Polient 2015-201/-of-cohesion-

3/data

blic icy 17,

T(Wwthama

TatoaimshTththbEinbUind“sfr1sKthUbOgpa“f

1 hn2 BC3 Blih84 Mcreeh

This is still84.2%), bu

Western Euwith 35%). hat the iss

amounts ofmust be hagendas.

The exit of amongst theo the EU b

and France)mpact on fsuggest thathowever, reThis would he UK debahe UK wil

budget as aEU internanstance, Nobenefit fromUK in the nternal mardata from tstructural grom the UK2 to 13 billi

some expeKingdom alshe actual e

UK’s exit frobillion euroOettinger degap should programs (oand the othfresh mone

See the numb

http://ec.europan.cfm.

J. Núñez FerrBrexit on the ECEPS policy b

M. Khan, JunBrexit shortfall.ift cap on comhttps://www.ft.c88f7-5465a6ce

V. D'AgostinoMFF ongoing dcombines the necognizing the

elephants in thhttp://www.farm

l much lesut much mropean couThese nu

sue of the f funds thahigh on t

the Unitede three highbudget (tog),1 will havefuture EU t the scale

emain at a possibly beate, and sel either co

a condition oal market orway), or t

m trade tarevent it r

rket.2 Accohe Europea

gap” in the K leaving is ion euro anerts, givenso benefits effective buom the EU o per yeeclared tha

be filled or, in other her half of iey.”4

bers under: a.eu/budget/fi

rer and D. RinEU Budget: A nrief No. 347, 7

ncker asks EU. EU Commissmon budget, 8com/content/ee1a00. o, Thoughts andebate: Is therneed to finance importance ahe room”? 12 Jm-europe.eu/2

ss than in more than untries (starmbers cleanext MFF

at they willhe CEE

d Kingdom,hest net co

gether with e a seriousfinances. Eof this impa“manageab

e the result econdly, theontribute toof participat

(similarly the EU budgiffs imposeremains ouording to than CommisEU budgetestimated tnually.3 Acc

n that thefrom the EU

udgetary cobudget migear. Comat 50% of tby cuts towords, by

it should co

gures/interact

naldi, The Impnon-catastroph7 September 2

U states to maksion president8 January 201

ec984ab2-f495

nd reflections re a strategy wce new challenand role of “thJanuary 2018,2018/01/.

Portugal in other

rting there arly show and the bring in countries’

which is ontributors

Germany s negative Estimates act could, ble” level. of, firstly,

e fact that o the EU ting in the

to, for get would

ed on the utside the e newest ssion, the t resulting to be from cording to e United U budget, ost of the ght be 6.6 missioner the Brexit o existing

savings), ome from

tive/index_e

act of hic event, 2016, p. 5. ke up for t seeks to 18, 5-11e7-

on the next which nges by he ,

Mapr

AfitsfinshthePoanVisincanophomicoparesuwimeopthea cothitheFin

At thaasarefunexTh

5 BPrepuof t6 JCroaftehtteveDeVisRopolhtt397nisprioFra7 I.CoVoCohttme

apping references

fter the Eur “Reflection

nances” on 2hared their e CEE regoland, the Cnd/or in thsegrad Groclude somend Eastern ppose overowever, awaight be lo

ommon articularly, main the

upported thout, howean by “adpinions of their strong E

direct toonvergence,is issue mue debatesnancial Fram

the same tat the new c

s climate che sufficiennds, althou

xpense of thhat is why

Bulgaria, as theesidency in 20blish any specthis period.

Joint Paper of oatia, Romanier 2020, 2 Map://www.visegents-in-2017-1

eclaration of thsegrad Group omania and Sllicy (CAP) afteps://www.minr729/version/1/

sters%2002.06orities for the amework, 5.ja

Musiałkowskohesion Policyolume 1:1(1) 2ommunity Studp://www.pecsa

e%201%20Iss

Squaring

CEE o

opean Comn paper on28 June 20opinions in

gion analysCzech Repuhe joint deup, some o

e other partEuropean

rall budgetare that theower. In tagricultural the cohes

main buby “adeq

wever, speequate”. Bo

he region, cEuropean adool for s,7 and, accoust be a ke on the mework.

time, the Cchallenges hange, migtly urgent gh this sho

he current pHungary a

e country hold018, will remaicific national p

the Visegrad Gia and Sloveniarch 2017, gradgroup.eu/c170203/joint-phe ministers ofcountries as wovenia on the er 2020, 2 Junrol.gov.pl/cont/file/Declaratio6.2017.pdf, anpost-2020 Munuary 2017.

a, “European ” in: The Revie017, The Polis

dies Associatioa.edu.pl/sites/ue%201.pdf.

the circle?

overall

mmission prn the future017, some cn non-papesed in thisublic and Roeclarations of them extetners.6 Thecountries gt cuts. The amount atheir opini policy

sion policy udgetary quate” resecifying whoth policies

consistentlydded value strengtheniording to theey building

next Mu

EE countriethe EU fac

gration or teto requir

ould not bepriorities in and Poland

ding the EU-Cin neutral and

positions befor

Group, Bulgaria on Cohesio

calendar/selecpaper-of-the, af agriculture ofwell as of Bulg common agri

ne 2017, tent/downloadon%20of%20tnd Non-paper ultiannual Fina

Union Valuesiew of Europeash European on PECSA, p./default/files/d

| page 3

budget

resented e of EU countries ers (from s paper: omania)5

of the ended to Central

generally hey are, available on, the

and, should

priorities sources,

hat they s, in the y confirm

and are ng EU e region, block in ltiannual

es agree es, such errorism, re more e at the funding. call for

ouncil will not

re the end

ria, on Policy

cted-and Joint f the garia, icultural

d/61849/3the%20Mion the V4

ancial

s in the an Affairs,

148, ocs/Volu

inathwthlaththsfaplepcinswdeafremu

TpaEvbthpfumirththimTathmpaCEoahEpthmpbpfe

ncreasing tand and hemselves,

witness its hat the net arger amouhe budget’she CEE sta

spending mairer. They

performanceegislation opolicies anconcentration the opinsavings, hewhere it isdifferences effect, the Eand thus triendly. Thi

expectationsmention buurgently in n

The CEE spropose thaassessmentEuropean avalue shoulbased on he diff

policies helulfil the

main priorrrespective he methodheir mplementatThey do agree that he cen

managed programs (as Horizon 2Connecting Europe Faor Erasmautomaticallhave European projects do hat not al

managed projects conbe even moprinciple caeeling to th

the paymeare also rather reduction. payers will

unts withouts structure ates proposmore effectivy opt for e, simpliof the cohesd for a f

on on resultion of the

elp the mons most nee

among mEU should athe entire is would als of thosureaucracy need of refo

states at the t of

added ld be

how ferent lp to EU’s

rities, of

d of

tion. not

only ntrally

(such 2020,

acility, mus+) ly

a added valnot always l sectoral from Bru

nducted at re effectiven bring moe local com

nts into thready to

than, rathFurthermornot be willi

t broader rand its gove making thve and its a closer

ification sion and agfurther andts. This sho

CEE regioney reach eded and member slso make itsEU, more

so help to se Europea

as the aorm.

lue, while have it. Thprojects s

ussels. Sthe local le, and the suore of an o

mmunity, wh

e budget o do so her than re, aware ing to pay eforms to vernance, he budget

divisions focus on of the

gricultural d deeper ould bring, on, some the fields eliminate tates. In s policies, e citizen-meet the

ans who rea most

national his implies hould be ometimes

evel might ubsidiarity ownership hich in the

wipragmastrcaedecpebemo

Coeq

Allgroteraretheba

FigSt

SoPoReBrefunww7/6

der perspeiorities. How

gainst the ganaged prress the im

ase, the invducation dconomicallyeople’s undee a tool ovements.

ommon agqual treatm

l of the Coup of net rms, and Pe among the case of P

alances of u

gure 2: CAPtates, 2014-

ource: Directoolicy Departmeesearch for AGexit on the Ending, ww.europarl.eu602007/IPOL_

Squaring

ctive also swever, the Ceneral ideaograms. Fportance ofestment in

does not , it also erstanding in fending

gricultural ent needed

CEE countrCAP benefoland, Rom

he top five Poland, thisp to 3.1 bill

P net balan-2016 avera

orate-General ent Structural GRI CommitteEU budget aEuropean uropa.eu/RegD_STU(2017)60

the circle?

suits the ECEE states

a of having For exampf Erasmus+young peomerely pincreases

of Europe g off the

policy (Cd

ries belongficiaries in amania and

CAP recips translates lion euro.

nces of EU age

for Internaland Cohesion

ee – Possible and, in particu

Union Data/etudes/S

02007_EN.pdf

| page 4

uropean s are not centrally le, they +. In this ople and pay off

young and can populist

CAP) –

g to the absolute Hungary

pients. In into net

Member

Policies. n Policies, impact of

ular, CAP 2017,

STUD/201f, p. 28.

TBthcadwHathninmthTincrebbgobamPCthocdre20Gthofi 8 phd9 thRph3n10

ppr.h82]_

The VisegBulgaria, Rhe two-pilla

composed oand the sdevelopmenwith the AgHogan,8 as and call for he CAP and

need to ncreasing member stahe impleme

The CAP nstruments complementeplace,

based suppbe implgradually, ason a vbasis, takiaccount themember Poland, theCAP recipiehe analyse

opts for retacurrent dimension elation to

27 GDP 0.43% of thGDP), as ohis policy e

object to theinancing the T.Bielecki, Ile

polscy rolnicy?http://wyborczadostana-w-przy

Joint Declarahe Visegrad G

Romania and Spolicy (CAP) afhttps://www.mi39729/version/nisters%2002.0

0 Ministerstwopolityka rolna pprzyjęty przez ., Warszawa 2

http://www.min8415/version/120_wer%2020_final.pdf.

rad countomania an

ar CAP, withof direct pasecond on

nt. With thagriculture Cwell as its a better c

d other EU enhance the com

ates in planentation of financial

should t, but not

grant-port and emented s well as voluntary ng into

e specific states.9

e biggest ent from

ed group, aining the

financial in

the EU-(today

he EU-27 only such aeffective. 10 e idea of the direct pay

e z Unii dostan?, 30.Novembea.pl/7,75399,2yszlym-budze

ation of the minGroup countrieSlovenia on thfter 2020, 2 Juinrol.gov.pl/co/1/file/Declara06.2017.pdf.

o Rolnictwa i Rpo 2020 – polsRadę Ministró

2017, nrol.gov.pl/con

/file/Priorytety170516%20[p

tries, as d Slovenia

h the first payments forne financiat, they staCommissioncurrent com

coordinationpolicies. Thits efficie

mpetencies nning and c

the CAP m

an approacPoland ande national s

yments.

ną w przyszłymer 2018,

22717489,ile-zecie-polscy-rolnisters of agrices as well as ohe common agune 2017,

ontent/downloation%20of%20

Rozwoju Wsi, skie priorytetyów w dniu 16 m

ntent/downloady%20WPR%2przyjeta%20pr

well as a, support illar being r farmers, ing rural ay in line naire Phil mponents between hey see a ency by

of the controlling measures.

ch makes d Hungary states co-

m budżecie

z-unii-nicy.html culture of of Bulgaria, gricultural

ad/61849/30the%20Mi

Wspólna y. Dokument maja 2017

d/61603/330po%2020

rzez%20RM

FuanthetreWlevav Figva

So20htt/pu01a408

ThpecoothtopcaAspane 11 C202htt/pu01a408

urthermore, nd Romaniae Baltic Seatment ofestern Eurvels of direcverage (266

gure 3: Direalues for 20

ource: CAP ex15-2020, 13 Nps://publicatio

ublication/541faa75ed71a1/l843483.

hey believeer hectare sountry, whilher specpography, a

alculating ths it is expaper, equecessary to

CAP explained20, 13 Novemps://publicatio

ublication/541faa75ed71a1/l843483.

Poland, a, togetherStates, caf their fa

ropean couct paymentseuro per he

ect paymen15

plained. DirecNovember 201ns.europa.eu/f0184-759e-11anguage-en/fo

the amoushould be e currentlyific condiare taken ine amount olained in tal direct

o make the

d. Direct paymmber 2017,

ns.europa.eu/f0184-759e-11anguage-en/fo

Slovakia, r with Croaall for thearmers anunterparts, s are belowectare).11

nts in €/ha,

ct payments fo7, /en/publication1e7-b2f2-ormat-PDF/so

unt paid to the same

y labour coitions, sunto consideof direct pathe Polish

paymene common

ments for farm

/en/publication1e7-b2f2-ormat-PDF/so

Bulgaria atia and e same nd their as their

w the EU

average

or farmers

n-detail/-

ource-

farmers in every

osts and uch as eration in ayments.

position ts are market

mers 2015-

n-detail/-

ource-

Squaring the circle? | page 5

cmrecuIttrccthinafoscincaththpbfumcwRpaaTopththShepPaoswidam

12

13

awCaR

competitive meet theequirement

challenges),use of the at would alsreaty goal

cohesion ancitizens. Pohe decisionntensity of ago should or current

solution prcountries wncrease thcountries average payhe paymenhe average

position, thebe a more eunds, but

more savicountries would be smRepublic or priority, eamounts areas the PolishThere are aof the Cpriorities difhe agriculthe same

Slovakia andhave many established post-commuPolish, Romagricultural other handsmaller famwhy the Eurdea of suppand mediummuch more

2 Ministerstwo3 According to

agricultural holwas an averagCzech Republiaverages (beloRomania and H

(as all Ee same ts and to, as well aagricultural so be an ims in the nd for the oland claimns concerni

productionnot decide and future

roposed bwould be, the amount

receiving yments andnts for thoe. Accordine result wouequal spread

it would angs, as the amou

maller. For Hungary thven thoue on the sh ones. lso some o

CAP budgeffer in the ural structuin all the d the Czechlarge farmson the ba

unist state fmanian and

structure, d, is div

mily entitiesropean Comporting rathm-sized fae support

o Rolnictwa i Ro Eurostat, thedings in any o

ge of 133 hectaic, while someow 10 hectaresHungary.

U farmers standard

o face thas for a suresources i

mplementatifield of equal righ

ms, furthermng the amo

n made mathe level o

e CAP goaby the mthough, to ts in the

below d decrease ose above ng to this

uld not only ding of the also bring in some

unts paid the Czech

his is not a ugh their same level

other areas et where region, as ure is not countries.

h Republic s that were asis of the farms. The Hungarian on the

vided into .13 That is mmission’s her smaller arms sees

in the lat

Rozwoju Wsi, ie largest averaof the EU Memares recorded

e of the smalles) were found

have to ds and he same ustainable n the EU. on of the economic

hts of EU more, that ounts and any years of support als.12 The mentioned

tter three

ibid. age size of mber States for the

est in

coSlosuwe CoexIn rescaMa20

SoEusochttphes

ountries thaovaks and

upport for laell.

ohesion poxisting gap

2015, msidents (27

apita GDP bap 1: Struc020

ource: Europeaurope, Our Futcial and territop://ec.europa.sion-report

an in the Czechs w

rge agricult

olicy – thes in develoore than %) lived in

below 75% octural funds

an Commissioture. Seventh rorial cohesion,eu/regional_p

former twwill be catural busine

e way to mopment

one in fa region w

of the EU avs eligibility

on, My Regionreport on econ, p. IX, policy/en/inform

wo. The lling for

esses as

minimise

four EU ith a per verage. 2014 –

n, My nomic,

mation/co

Squaring the circle? | page 6

MCPBbreTCpcCscincreinsEcassecsinAoabtoeinO1p1c

14

Otehh15

Ca16

CthEimPs

Most of thCentral anPortugal, SBulgaria andbelow 50% egions.14

The VisegraCroatia andpolicy as convergenceCentral andstated in thcohesion pnvestment creating jobelated to tntegration. should remaEU budget countries aadded valuseen in allsocial and evaluations contributes social incluncluding thAs a study of Economicand direct ebenefits to otal econom

euro from imn the ViseOver this pe

20 billion policy. That

5 contributcohesion po

4 European Co

Our Future: Seerritorial cohes

http://ec.europahesion-report/.

5 Joint Paper oCroatia, Romaafter 2020, ibid

6 How do EU-Cohesion Poliche Ex post eva

EU-15 countriemplementationPolish Ministry summary, p. 6,

hese regiod Eastern

Spain and d Romaniaof the EU a

ad Group, d Slovenia

the maine between Eastern Eheir joint d

policy is thpolicy sup

bs. Its objthe fundamThat is wh

ain one of tafter 2020

also argue e of cohel its dimenterritorial

showingto growth

sion in a ose in nonprepared bc Developm

export benefthe EU-15

mic benefitsmplementingegrad couneriod, the E

euro grosis equivale

tions for tholicy in tho

ommission, Meventh report osion, Brusselsa.eu/regional_

of the Visegrania and Slove

d.

15 Member Scy in the V4? Raluation and foes as a result on in V4 countr

y of Economic ,

ons are lon Europe,

Southern a, per capitaaverage in

Bulgaria, perceive

n tool to n the Wesuropean re

declaration he fundampporting groectives are

mentals of y, in their othe key pilla0.15 The mthat the

esion policynsions – e– and ha how m

h, employmnumber of-cohesion y the Polish

ment showsfits and dire

5 point to es of approx.g the cohesntries in 20U-15 contri

ss to the ent to 80% o

e implemeose four co

My Region, My on economic, s, September 2_policy/en/info

ad Group, Bulgenia on Cohes

States benefit fReport preparforecast of benof Cohesion P

ries, commissiDevelopment

ocated in Greece, Italy. In

a GDP is nearly all

Romania, cohesion

achieve stern and egions. As

of 2017, ental EU owth and e directly European opinion, it ars of the

mentioned European y can be economic, ve made much it

ment and f regions, countries. h Ministry s, indirect ect capital estimated 97 billion

sion policy 007-2015. ibuted ca. cohesion

of the EU-ntation of ountries.16

y Europe, social and 2017, p. 2, ormation/co

garia, ion Policy

from the red within nefits to Policy ioned by t, Executive

AlsrecocobydirancoThstatheporeglesstauncoregneinfcothepofuta orintsainccoopmegounco4.0Buav20becoEU htt_E17 EEUandhtt36418 Eadjhttexpona

so, the Euport on ec

ohesion estountries beny investmenrectly (comnd indirectohesion couhese findinates, clearle budget a

olicy, althougions, shouss developeates undenavoidable, onsiderationgions whic

etworking fluence on

ountry. To ese saved

ossible, as ture cohesifew importientation, tegrated ap

ame time, thcreasing th

ohesion polpinion, resember statood econnemploymenountries (Cz0%, Polanulgaria: 6.2verage: 7.3%0.5%)18 woue not as voohesion pU countries ps://www.ewaN.pdf.

European ComU Finances: thd territorial cop://europa.eu/43_en.htm.

Eurostat, Unejusted, Novemp://ec.europa.plained/index.ally_adjusted,

uropean Coconomic, soimates that

nefit from spnts in cohespanies fromly (as hintries incre

ngs, accordy demonst

are unavoidugh generaluld pay speed regions. erstand so

they should alsh may, dueeffects, hathe developsave some

d funds stated in thon policy stant elemen

flexibility,pproach andhey do not he national icy, as it w

shuffle thees. As regomic situnt rates

zech Repubnd: 4.5%, %, Slovakia%, Spain: 1uld probablyocal for socpolicy ascould be.

aluacja.gov.pl/

mmission - Fae Seventh rephesion, Bruss/rapid/press-re

mployment ramber 2017, eu/eurostat/stphp/File:Unem_November_2

ommission’ocial and tt the non-cpill-overs gesion countrm these coigher inco

ease trade).ding to thrate that if

dable, the clly targetingcial attentioWhile the a

ome cuts believe

so be given e to spill-oave a sipment of the money aas efficiehe joint pa

should be bnts such as, propord simplicitysupport theco-funding

would only,e burden gards priorituation anin the V

blic: 2.5%, HRomania:

a: 6.5% w16.7% and y motivate cial aspect

s the s

/media/33003/

act Sheet, Theport on economsels, 9 Octobeelease_MEMO

ates, seasonal

tatistics-mployment_ra2017_(%25)_F

’s latest territorial cohesion enerated ries both ountries) mes in 17 he CEE f cuts in cohesion g all EU on to the analysed

to be proper

to those over and gnificant

he entire and use ntly as

aper, the ased on s result-rtionality, y. At the e idea of g in the

in their to the

ties, the nd low Visegrad Hungary: : 4.7%, hile EU-Greece: them to

ts in the southern

/EU15_ES

e Future of mic, social r 2017,

O-17-

lly

ates,_seasF2.png.

Squaring the circle? | page 7

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-3643_en.htm.

AccapAscsassTEFCthspreimbpthvthuth

A–t

TthCaspcgCBala

19

Otephh20

GP21

N

An importancould makecurrent leveabsorption. perhaps, cuAccording tspending, contracted mspending oalready beestates, is tosame time dThis tendenEuropean UFurthermoreCommissionhe current

starting morperiod, haseasonably mplementatbroadly simperiod.19 Thhe good ab

valid one. The current

used againshe amount

Alliance bu– the possihe cohesio

The group ohe above

Cohesion Pas open to similarly to tprevious mucountries wgroups undeCohesion PBetter Spenargued for atter insiste

9 European Co

Our Future, Seerritorial cohes

p.177, http://ec.europahesion-report/.

0 Bulgaria, CroGreece, HungaPortugal, Roma

1 Austria, GermNetherlands an

nt argumene for keepels could

The leveurrently notto the Eurmeasured

money, i.e. of which ten signed inoday slightlduring the pcy, though,

Union, not je, accordinn, the rate ot programmre slowly thas now caug

be tion rates f

milar to thohus, ultimatebsorption oThe region slower spe

st the entireof money d

uilding in bbility of a r

on policy

of countriese-mentionedolicy after 2further Wes

the last MFFulti-annual bwere divider the namePolicy”20 annding”.21 Whhigher funded on the

ommission, Meventh report osion, Brussels

a.eu/regional_

oatia, the Czeary, Lithuania,ania, Slovakia

many, Finlandnd Sweden

nt the CEE ping funds be their sl of absot really saopean Com

by the the level ofthe contran the giveny lower tha

previous MF, concerns ust the CE

ng to the of project seming perioan in the 20ght up, an

expectedfrom now oose in the ely, the arg

of funds shofears, how

ending rate e cohesion pdevoted to it

budget negrevived coa

s that in 201d Declara2020 percest EuropeaF negotiatiobudget rouned into twes of the “Fnd the “Fhile the formds for coheneed to lim

My Region, My on economic, s, September 2

_policy/en/info

ech Republic, E, Latvia, Maltaa, Slovenia an

d, France, Italy

countries at their

successful rption is, tisfactory. mmission,

level of f funds for cts have

n member an at the FF period. the entire

EE region. European election in od, while 007–2013 nd it can that

on will be previous

gument of ould be a ever, that could be

policy and t.

gotiations alition on

17 signed ation on eives itself n support

ons. In the nd, the EU wo main Friends of riends of

mer group esion, the mit public

y Europe, social and 2017,

ormation/co

Estonia, a, Poland, d Spain

y, the

spexadConato

HorouCoreaasdeintBuinfcruBafunfinfordigcowhinfneSeSloeqfarcosudifdifthethecrojussusulotcoFrthewofunFuthemiSlothe

Exfo

Thtodpr

pending anxpenditures dditional gohesion” ulamely a larg

cohesion p

owever, it und, if esohesion” coasons. First

s homogeevelopment terests. Foulgaria thfrastructure ucial spendaltic States nding innov

nd themselvr them sucgital ag

ompetitivenehile despitefrastructure eed of furthecondly, whovakia or

qual level rmers, othe

oalition areupportive. Efferent pafferences ineir readinese more so oss-fields cst one ga

upporters. Iuch countriet about CAP

oncentrated ench positioe CEE counould need nds for urthermore, e Eurozoneight divide ovakia mighe rest.

xternal andr not forge

he new chday are a miorities of E

Squaring

d considerto be the

growth. Ttimately acge part of t

projects.

is expectestablished, ould be wetly, the coun

enous in and, subs

r example, e develo

(e.g., roding prioritywish to co

vation. The ves somewhch issues genda, ess matter e the implem

projects, ther investmhile the Bal

Romania of direct

er countriese, as meEven thougrt of then the regioss to build as possibly

constellationathering ofn the last

es like PolaP, left this is

on coheson is not yentries mightto fight magriculture the issue

e and goalsthe region,

ht have diffe

d security petting the E

hallenges thmotivating faU funding a

the circle?

red the qukey to ge

The “Frienchieved thethe budget

ted that ththe “Frie

eaker for twntries are n

their esequently, for Roma

opment ooads) remy, while th

oncentrate mVisegrad c

here in betwas innovatresearch

r more andmentation there is st

ments in thltic States, would opt payments

s from the entioned,

gh this cone budget,on might iother coality at the enn will be buf cohesionMFF nego

and, which ssue to Fraion. This t

et clear enot be afraid t

much more by them

of membes connected, as the euerent priorit

policy – CEEast

hat the Eactor to chaand, for exa

| page 8

uality of enerating nds of eir goal, devoted

his time ends of wo main no longer conomic in their

ania and f hard

mains a he small more on countries ween, as tion, the

and d more, of many till some his area.

Poland, for an for all

possible not so

ncerns a these nfluence tions, all nd some uilt – not n policy otiations, cared a

ance and time the

ough and that they

for the mselves. ership in d to that uro-state ties from

EE opts

U faces ange the ample, to

aafoTthacethboHdSeaodnsadatiwoapEu

InnCscbfisnthSpoRsswag

22

inreSAInsn

allocate morand causes or increasin

The CEE che CEE cou

advantages countries ementering thehere seems

by that provone of the mHowever, wdefinition ofSome southeastern neiand would operations, developmenneighbourhosome counalso by disproportioautomaticallime, the ea

when, at theor challengeand the processes inEastern Paunstable.

n conseqnegotiationsCzech Repuspending thchallenges cboth neighighting the

southern nnecessary, he cost of

Still, this issprioritized nofficial positRomania wosupport Mostress Ukrawill be not aa few yeargovernment

2 The Easternnitiative which elations betwe

States and its sAzerbaijan, Ben this framewotabilisation an

neighbours.

re funds forof migratio

ng the EU’ountries suuntries, sec

of integmphasized e Europeas to be a cviding secumain challe

what is lacf what is ahern EU coghbourhoodrather diresuch as

nt policy ood. As a ntries, like

the Banate amouly in this diast is left bee same timees connect

economn this and oartnership22

quence, is, Poland, ublic might hat adequaconnected wbourhoods.

e causes oneighbourhobut believethe EU’s

sue is not tnow, and tions. One ould rather oldova, whaine. It is pas vocal in trs ago, ast has mu

Partnership ( aims to deep

een the Europsix Eastern ne

elarus, Georgiaork, the EU focnd resilience o

r fighting theon and terro’s role in tupport this curity was ogration thamost stronn Union.

consensus irity for its c

enges the Ecking is a a threat to

ountries perd as a saect funds

that in in the

result, accPoland (s

altic Staunt of monrection. At ehind in thie, the war ited with de

mic transother countr

make th

n the Slovakia

insist on a ately addrewith develo. They agof migratioood is moe it should eastern nethe most urthere are can only exmention th

hile Slovakpossible thathis respect the currech cooler

(EaP) is a jointpen and strengpean Union, itseighbours: Arma, Moldova ancuses on incre

of the EU's Eas

e sources orism, and he world. idea. For

one of the at these ngly while Currently, in the EU citizens is EU faces.

common o the EU. rceive the

afe region to global Mali or southern

cording to supported

ates), a ney goes the same is respect n Ukraine emocracy

sformation ries of the is region

upcoming or the

future EU esses the pments in gree that on in the ore than not be at

eighbours. rgent and no clear

xpect that e need to

kia would at Poland t as it was ent Polish

bilateral

t policy gthen s Member menia, nd Ukraine. easing the stern

relbehisUkthecutheUkoththeproBaReproboregSe

In pedosuanpufraCoPococoindto naWfinprotheexobenanreg

23 T(GeReandHeand20cooshothrinsecoresin s

lations withecause of storical evekraine at the state of it

urrently influe rights okraine in thher hand, sese two obably focualkans, andepublic anojects such

oost the dgion23 or pea region ar

terms oferceived neoes not meupport all pny reservaturchases amework ooperation oland and ountries likeonsiderable dustry will those of Ho

amely, big estern Eu

nanced direoposed Pole Hungarian

xpanding thbligation ofntities reprend larger gions.

This strategy cermany, Austr

epublic, Slovend five non-EU

erzegovina, Mod was propose10 and endorsoperation betwould address seats, lack of ro

sufficient energonomic develosearch and innsafety and sec

Squaring

Ukraine thdifferent

ents. Hunghe EU levets bilateral ruenced maif the Hun

he field of tability in Ucountries.

us its attent be here jo

nd Hungarh as the Ddevelopmenprojects reare also impo

f hard seced to invesean that trojects in tions. Joint of equipmof Perm(PESCO) Hungary,

e Slovakia military in

suffer as morizon 2020and strongrope will

ectly from tlish solutionn way of th

he regulatiof creating senting botpartners f

covers parts oria, Hungary, Cnia, Bulgaria, Rcountries (Se

ontenegro, Uked by the Eurosed in 2011. Bween the counsuch challengoad and rail trgy connectionopment, uncoonovation systecurity.

the circle?

han the forminterpretat

gary’s supel might deprelations, winly by the

ngarian mineducation.

Ukraine is crBulgaria

tion on the oined by thery. For B

Danube Strant of the alized in thortant.

curity issust more in tthe CEE cthis regardt procuremment withanent Straise concwhile the do not ha

ndustry, thmechanisms0 will predomg companiwin the

the EU bun that is in inking is, thons to incl

a consorth smaller, from differ

of nine EU couCzech RepubRomania and

erbia, Bosnia akraine and Moopean CommiBetter coordinantries and regiges as environransport (as wns), uneven soordinated edu

ems and short

| page 9

mer one tions of port for pend on

which are issue of

nority in On the

rucial for would

Western e Czech Bulgaria, ategy to riparian

he Black

ues, the this area countries without ent and

hin the tructured cerns in

smaller ave any hat their s similar minate – es from tenders

udget. A line with

herefore, ude the rtium of medium

rent EU

untries lic, Slovak Croatia)

and ldova) ission in ation and ions mental

well as ocio-cation, comings

InE

AdpcPEhcre

TcdnreuEocreinathOstodsVaimaEimoIta

24

tohbctohec25

ch26

'rh27

k9cp4

ntroducingEU budget

A cross-cudiscussions policy afteconditionalitParticularly, EU budget, have been conditions espect for c

The debate countries reduring the 2not comply efugees. As

understood European sof thinking,certain recipesponse ton the refugealso subseqhe EU bu

Oettinger sashould conso respect fo

denies it isuggested Vera Jouroapproach ismplementedalthough theEU membemplementedon the issuets Preside

against s

4 Juncker rejeo human rights

https://www.neberlins-call-tie-conditionality/; o reform cohe

https://www.eueu/news/francecohesion-funds

5 E. Maurice, Cconditions for Ehttps://euobser

6 E. Zalan, Jusrule of law', 31https://euobser

7 E. Stasik, Jukurka z pienięd9.January 2018chce-przykr%Cpieni%C4%99d42076043.

g more co– scepticis

tting issuerelated ma

er 2020 ty as it per

some netsuch as Garguing fo

that wouldcommon rul

was launcefused to u015-2016 rwith the res the cohes

to be aolidarity, ac reducing pient count

o that countee crisis. O

quently suggudget comaid in May

sider linkingor the rule os his ideaby EU ju

ova in aus directed d by Polaere is no coer states d. Neither ie in the Eurnt, Jean Csuch con

ects Berlin’s cats conditionaliteweurope.eu/a-cohesion-fundA. Robert, Frasion funds, 13

uractiv.com/see-and-germans/. Commission hEU funds, 30 Mrver.com/institstice commiss October 201

rver.com/politiuncker nie chcdzmi. "Rozwią8, http://www.

C4%99ca%C4dzmi-rozwi%C

onditionalitsm prevails

e, howeverainly to the

is the irtains to thet contributoGermany oor introducd help uples.24

ched after uphold EU refugee crisallocation qsion policy sa demonstccording to

these funry could bery’s lack of

Other conditgested. For mmissioner y 2017 thag access to of law,25 howa. The sa

ustice comutumn 201against theand and onsensus athat it shs there a cropean ComClaude Junditionality.

all to tie Cohesty, 2 June 201article/juncker-ds-human-righrance and Ger3 October 201ection/future-ny-seek-to-refo

hints at politicaMay 2017, tutional/13806sioner links EU7, ical/139720.

ce przykręcać ązanie w zgodzdw.com/pl/jun

4%87-polsce-kC4%85zanie-w

ty to the s

r, in the cohesion

issue of e budget.

ors to the r France,

cing such phold the

some EU solidarity

is and did quotas for should be ration of this way

nds to a e a direct f solidarity ions were example, Günther

at the EU EU funds wever, he ame was missioner 7.26 This e reforms Hungary, mong the hould be onsensus mmission. ncker, is 27 Yet,

sion funds 7, -rejects-hts-rmany seek 7,

orm-

al

63. U funds to

Polsce zie",

ncker-nie-kurka-z-w-zgodzie/a-

ultmeFudecoun(inaswhthedir

Acco– goshgein hoBuupevsuwaonnofrothe

ColawCEMiabarehaagmacowhcoeccacoarecoamcotheFuhewaEUcabreTrsothe

timately, thember staturthermore, ecision ononditionality nanimously ncluding thes a result) hether it woe EU Courective.

ccording toonditionality meaning a

o” area. Thared by enerally cal

this respeolding the ulgaria will pcoming moven the Eurupport the ay. Possiblynly to countot inviting tom this mone stick.

onditionalityw is also EE countrinister has ble to blocke implemen

as no conflicgainst such ain argum

ountries – mhich are direondition is conomic anase of mohesion). Me of the

onnection smount of fuohesion polie Europeanurthermore, eard from tants to punU law, it wiall the giveeaking the eaty rathe

ociety, whiche governm

Squaring th

he governmtes will m

it is unn the im

must by all

e ones that as a par

ould requireuncil as be

o all CEEconnected

ccepting rehis positioBulgaria, ling for stro

ect. HoweveEU Co

probably nonths. It seropean Comidea of pu

y, some funtries that ahem wouldney. The ca

y connectedunanimousies. The already sta

k the budgented. But evct regardinga form of

ment raisemainly by Poectly affecte

that one nd political migration –Moreover, th

opinion hould be m

unds in theicy and the

n Semester some op

the region nish a counll be much n governmrules by usr than to h might, in ment’s po

he circle? |

ments of make the dnclear whemplementat

be member

would be prt of the Me a majorityeing a pa

E countrie to migratio

efugees – ion might e

a border onger EU ser, as the

ouncil prenot be vocaeems, thoummission dunishing in nds will be

accept refugd mean resarrot would

d with the sly rejected

Polish Eated that Pet if such sven Slovakig the rule oconditiona

ed by theoland and ed – agains

e should nissues (or

– migratiohose two c

that a made betwe framewore implemen

by a given pinions hav

that, if onntry for not more impo

ment to accsing Article

punish thepart, disag

olicy. Cutt

page 10

the EU decision. ether a tion of reached

states punished MFF, or y vote in art of a

es, any on policy s a “no-

even be country

solidarity country

sidency, al in the ugh, that does not

such a directed

gees, so signation replace

rule of by the uropean

Poland is solutions a, which

of law, is lity. The e CEE Hungary

st such a not link r, in the on and countries stronger

ween the k of the tation of country.

ve been ne really

obeying ortant to

count for 7 of the e entire

gree with ting or

saa

Mc

Arepthaaflathocobthcp

McssEthdofos7RSRcit4joa2mcre 28

Ca29

2coabc0

suspending ammunition arguments.

Managemencross-regio

A further gegion is to

programmeshe right bal

and the speand regionslexibility fo

authorities sheir spec

operational countries woof stakeholdbalance bethe policy

controls, asprocedures.

Most of the countries sesystem of csuch as HEurope Facheir region

different funof centrally ror the ana

show, the s7.45% for Republic, 6Slovakia, 5.8Romania, wcountries tht is betwee404 analyseoined the altogether 22020, whilemillion eurocompanies egion are

8 Joint Paper oCroatia, Romaafter 2020, ibid

9 Statistics of 2020 – short reconcerns 404 cof submitted apagreements forbefore, 30 Sepcontent/upload0-404_calls.pd

these funto pop

nt of EU ponal coope

general posensure in

s (not onlyance betweecific needs. Accordingr national, should be cific objec

programould like to

ders’ competween the and the les well as 28

Central anee the nee

centrally maHorizon 20cility, to mn and devnding fields.redistributealysed regsuccess ratePoland, 8.9

6.35% for H85% for Buwhile for at joined th

en 15.6% aed projects

EU afte278 million e the EU-.29 The reaand institnot com

of the Visegrania and Slove

d.

Polish participeport after 404calls evaluatedpplications anr the impleme

ptember 2017,ds/2017/10/Podf.

ds would pulists’ an

rogrammeration

stulate of all implem

y in cohesioeen thematis of membg to this id

regional acreated to

ctives witmmes. Th

see a cleaetences andresult orien

evel of chea simplifi

nd Eastern ed for reforanaged prog020 or Coake them

velop links . Today, thd funds is vion. As the in Horizo96% for thHungary, 9

ulgaria and the EU-1

he EU beforand 8.3%. s, the couner 2004

euro from-15 receiveason is simutions in

mpetitive en

ad Group, Bulgenia on Cohes

pation in FP H4 calls, The and by the EC ind signed gran

entation of proj http://en.kpk.

oland_in_HOR

also give nti-Europe

s – more

the CEE ented EU on policy) ic support ber states dea, more and local

o address thin the

he CEE ar division d call for a ntation of ecks and cation of

European rming the grammes, onnecting fairer for between

e division very weak e figures n 2020 is he Czech 9.01% for 5.85% for 5 – the re 2004 – From the

ntries that received

m Horizon ed 3,733

mple – the the CEE nough in

garia, ion Policy

Horizon nalysis n the area nt jects gov.pl/wp-

RIZON_202

cococodeactheCeleaCEusAsunasReto Wcoextheinfprolinresquansutenbema

ThnosorecRoto Coauis EuthacaA PowocodifanimdifshanEaproon

omparison wounterparts ompanies froeveloped ancquiring funey win teentral and ads to distEE countriesed to build s matters snused after s no grants esearchers

countries estern rese

ome to the xample, in Ge quality frastructureovided, nobk between sult of co

ualified resend projects uch programndency inc

ehind the Wany in the re

he CEE couot against ome of thcipients froomania, eve

apply dommission uthorities, a

considereuropean onat call for c

an make thesolution

oland and sould be tooalitions cofferent reginother idea

mplementingfferent size

hould help snd not onlyastern Euoposal wou

nly for SMEs

Squaring th

with their Wto bid for

om Westernnd have mnds over thnders morEastern Eutortions. Foes, cohesion

very new, mstand, howtheir initiaare won fofrom the Cwhere ther

earchers haregion. At

Germany onof the

. As no gebody can cthis infras

hesion funearchers in

that couldmmes as Hcreases the

Western partegion.

untries are, the centra

he EU prm the regi

en stress hodirectly to

than ts the Rom

ed much ne. Those changes sue programmproposed, supported o have a onsisting oons. In thea can be a condition

es must rusmaller comy those inropean reuld be to hs.

he circle? |

Western Er the fundsn Europe a

more experhe years, re often thuropean onor examplen funds hamodern equ

wever, theyl funding r

or their expEE region ere are granave no incethe same tne hears p

Polish reneral ovecreate the

structure (thnd spendin the given

d be realisHorizon 202e sense of ts of Europ

however, gal managerogrammes.on, for exaow much eao the Eto the

manian bureworse th

CEE goveuggest that mes more e

for examby the Hun

rule for of partnere Czech Re heard, n that compun togethermpanies in n the Centegion. A have an ex

page 11

uropean s. The re better ience in and so, han the es. This

e, in the ve been uipment.

y remain uns out, loitation. emigrate nts, and entive to time, for raise for research

erview is needed

he direct ng), well

country ed from 20. This

lagging e felt by

generally ment of . Some ample in asier it is uropean national

eaucracy han the ernments

reforms effective.

mple, by ngarians building

rs from Republic,

namely, panies of r, which general

tral and further

xtra line

OTEthcpthbsratrbmGtrwTJbN1thinEsinitlipreitthMthtainJCm 30

M31

sphcwp432

re2hcJEhee

Own resourThere is European Uhe budget n

countries stpotential prohat can br

budget. Accsystem of ationalised,ransparent.

based own mechanismsGNI-based raditional o

work well anThe EuropJanuary 201be at the leNational Inc

.0%.31 Polahe same ncrease tEuropean Ustates do soncrease frots GNI for thke to becom

possible.32 Pemarks abots contributhe increas

Multiannual he 1% ceilaken into cn the V4 noJanuary 201Concerning might increa

0 Non-paper o

Multiannual Fin1 T. Bielecki, N

spójności, więkpraworządnośćhttp://www.dw.ci%C4%99cia-wi%C4%99kszpraworz%C4%42098270.

2 Z. Kovacs, Geady to contrib

2018, https://dailynewchief-hungary-.Valero, Hung

European budghttps://www.eueu/news/hungaeuropean-budg

rces – howa strong

Union that needs to betress they aoposals for ring more icording to th

own resou, simplified For this

resource s should

own reown resourcnd should bpean Com18 that the fevel of 1.1%come (GNI)and and Hutime that their conUnion’s buo. Hungary

om its currehe next fundme a net coPoland hasout the readtions. A gee of the t

Financial ling of the

consideratioon-paper on18.

other possase the bud

on the V4 priornancial FrameNowy budżet Uksze składki i pć, 10 January com/pl/nowy-

-w-polityce-sp%ze-sk%C5%82

%85dno%C5%

Government obute more to E

wshungary.coready-contribu

gary and Polanget,

uractiv.com/seary-and-polanget/.

w to get newargument

the revenue reformed. are ready t

new own rincome intohe V4 non-purces needd and ma

purpose, tand the cbe abolish

esource aces (custome maintainemission afuture budg

%-1.2% of t. The curreungary anno

they are tributions dget if all

y is talking ent 0.89% toding cycle aontributor ass only madediness for ineral statetotal amou

FrameworEU GNI s

on can also the future

sible resoudget’s reve

rities for the poework, Ibid. UE. Cięcia w ppytania o 2018, bud%C5%BC%C3%B3jno%2adki-i-pytania9B%C4%87/a

ffice chief: HuEU budget, 9 J

m/governmenute-eu-budgetnd defend larg

ection/future-d-defend-large

w funds t in the e side of The CEE o discuss resources o the EU paper, the ds to be

ade more the VAT-correction hed. The and the

ms duties) ed.30 greed in

get should the Gross nt level is ounced at ready to to the member

about an o 1.2% of and would s soon as e general ncreasing ment that nt of the rk above should be

be found MFF from

urces that nues, the

ost-2020

polityce

Cet-ue-%C5%9Bci-a-o-a-

ungary January

t-office-t/ and ger

er-

anthegediswhdischstaPoananthesystaMoSzpoNodisauEmcoforEUcoregETbesoancocoprosucoEvoffprosoA intcomeEUscPo CoThbuIn poonneop

nalysed coueir own pr

eneral budscussed. Thhether thescussion ar

hances to beates. In its oland evenny new ownnd rejects pe regressive

ystem. Howatements orawiecki azymański, Possibilities. ot for thescussions uctioning umission Trould be percr raising owU-level poountries, incgion, see pTS as a soue especiallources are nd this ontributions ountries frooblems with

uch a masontribution ven though ficial positioobably also

ource of owngeneral

troduction oncerning oean for theU – whicceptically inoland.

onclusionshe negotiatiudgetary fra

consequeositions migne might exegotiations. pinions are s

Squaring th

untries haveroposals, aget’s goalshey have ra solutionsre reasonae approvednon-paper opposes

n resourcesproposals te nature of

wever, accoof Prime and EuropePoland is re

first timeon raising

under the rading Sysceived as a

wn resourcesolicy tool. cluding thoproblems liurce of revey vocal, astill primarwould mextraordin

om the reh carbon emssive scalein the enethe analys

on in this o object to n resources

challenge or expans

wn resource further fech is ge

n countries

s ons on the

amework areence, the ght appearxpect at the

On somstill lacking,

he circle? |

e not comeas they cls should raised doubs that areable and had by all the on the fututhe introdu

s in the EUthat would f the own reording to th

Minister e Minister eady to dis

e are theg revenue

greenhoustem (ETSa natural cas as it alrea

However,ose from thinked to usenue. Polanas Polish rily based o

make theinarily highgion havemissions bue, as their ergy mix issed states field yet, tthe idea of

s. concerni

sion of sces is what ederalisationenerally pe

like Hung

future multre only just

countriesr very gene beginning me points, or a given

page 12

up with aim the first be

bts as to e under ave any member

ure MFF, uction of U budget

deepen esources he latest Mateusz Konrad

scuss all

ere also es from se gas

S). ETS andidate ady is an , some he CEE sing the nd could

energy on coal, r ETS . Other similar

ut not on carbon

s lower. have no they will f such a

ng the solutions

this will n of the erceived ary and

ti-annual starting.

s’ initial eral, as of such

s, clear n country

https://dailynewshungary.com/government-office-chief-hungary-ready-contribute-eu-budget/

dthrreoogthrevbd

HdRaafaa

GbbwaasfofuhctitospmsfoaacocooL

Asdthc

33

reRhre34

does not wahat has alunning debesources in

of discussioof the V4 cgoals shoulhen the deach these

volume of bottom-up different from

However, sodrawn. OnRepublic, Has well as alike, due tace. Still, o

as one cohe

Generally, tbudget cutsbecause of with the senand agriculanalysed costructure of or farmersunds and d

higher co-coming fromime, the CEo increase

security polproviding emitigating tsolution supor how to e

and securityand cohesiocountries’ pover their ccountries aofficial positon own resLevel Group

Analysing tstates, it isdebate on the opinion

consistently

3 Future financecommendatio

Resources, Bruhttp://ec.europaeport/index_e4 Ibid.

ant to assesready been

bates (for en the Monti ons. As statconcerning ld be ident

discussion e goals shthe budgeapproach m the previo

ome conclun some iHungary, Po

Bulgaria ato the simone should erent entity

the region s are neces

Brexit. Hontiment thature shouldountries cathe CAP a

financed do not agr-funding inm national bEE countriee spendinglicy, espec

external bohe causes

pported by Pextend expey policy wion funds invpayments iurrent 1%

also share ion towardsources pre

p chaired by

the positios already the MFF wns of the

confirms

cing of the EUons of the Higussels, Decema.eu/budget/mn.cfm.

ss a certainn mentione

example, onreport33) at ted in the nthe future tified first, about reso

hould start et be decidshould maous negotia

sions can aissues theoland and and Romailar challennot take t

in all respec

is aware tssary – andowever, it dt funds for d be reduall for retaand direct only from

ree with then cohesiobudgets. At es see the g for extecially in therder protec

s of migratPoland andenditures fothout reduc

volves incrento the EUGNI level. a lack of

s the other sented by

y Mario Mon

ns of the noticeable

will be very region, t

its strong

U. Final report gh Level Groupmber 2016, mff/hlgor/final-

n proposal ed in the n own EU

this point non-paper MFF, the and only

ources to and the

ded. This ake them ations.

already be e Czech Slovakia,

nia, think nges they his group cts.

hat some d not only disagrees cohesion

ced. The aining the payments the EU e idea of n policy the same necessity

ernal and e field of ction and tion. One d Hungary or external cing CAP easing the U budget The CEE f a clear proposals the High-

nti.34

member that the

sharp. In the CAP European

and p on Own

adstrBecostatheis cobalanstrtheexthecothestrcostrquEusuregeff

ThIt susutwcobeof thestrburolwocodrEucogogococotheMiItawh

35 HcomBe36 Fbrehtteueu-

dded valuerengtheningertelsmann ome to theate of the Ce direct pay

inefficient,ompetition. Tasing paymend while neructures ande quoted C

xactly the ote system

onsiderationey say todrengthening

ohesion poliressed by tuestion by urope. On thupport with ogion’s cafectiveness

he debate ois not surpr

upport introdurprising thawo countrieonditionalitiee put in forc

a linkage e Europearess the udget, therle. At the ould like ountries thaift away uropean vaould be seeood approvernments ountries, sucohesion funde documeninistry of Faly, need anho feel the

How Europe cmpetences am

ertelsmann StifF.Eder, Berlin eakers , 30.Maps://www.politrope-germany-rule-breakers

Squaring th

e and is g EU

Stiftung st conclusioCAP, mainyments syst, as it leaThe report eents on the

eglecting hed national laCEE countrther way aro

should the size oay is not t

g EU conveicy, which hthe CEEs,

some exhe other haother EU-mall for and coordi

on conditionrising that tducing any at Hungarys that wou

es linked to e, have combetween co

an Semesteeconomic

reby diminsame timeto have at do not fofrom com

alues. Suspen by someroach. F

of Wech as Germds and rulent preparedFinance in n explanatioey have su

can deliver. Opmong the EU aftung, Gueterslooks into free

ay 2017, tico.eu/article/y-berlin-looks-is/

he circle? |

a direct convergen

tudy, howevn that the ly the alloctem to the Eads to a especially c

e amount ofeterogeneityabour markries’ opinioound, as thmainly taof the farmthe case. Svergence thhas been shas been

xperts in and, what m

member statebetter sp

ination.

nality remainthe region dconditions,

y and Polauld be affrule of law

me up with ohesion poer. They

meaning ishing its

e, the Coma tool to

ollow EU rummonly apending the EU officiaFurthermoreestern E

many (the line of law camd by the spring 20

on for their uffered an

ptimising the dand its membesloh 2017, pp.ezing funds fo

/poland-rule-ofinto-freezing-f

page 13

tool for ce. A ver, has

current cation of EU level,

lack of criticized f utilised y in farm kets. 35 In ons, it is ey claim ke into

m, which Similarly, hanks to so much put into Western

might find es is the pending,

ns open. does not nor is it and, the fected if

w were to the idea

olicy and want to of the political

mmission punish

ules and accepted e funds als as a e, the uropean nkage of me up in German 17)36 orcitizens, injustice

division of er states, 33-42.

or EU rule-

f-law-funds-for-

pEwthrEthorecETptaitsthoa–HaarecBimEewpCmcpifadsmTthO 37

zW38

39

nh4a

paying for tEuropean sowhen needehe given ules. How

European chat punishin

opposite effeed card to t

could simplyEuropean rhThe pro-Eupart of Euraken for grts 87% supshould no hough the f

or nearly a positive – 53%, PoleHungarians and Czechsaverage)38 eminder th

can be sucBritish refermpression EU while receffectively awhy, despitepayers concCEE statesmight have acould see phenomenaf money is tand put intodevelopmenstill remain. mind duringThe joint tahe Budge

Oettinger, sq

7 B. Roguska,

z badań 50, CeWarsaw 2017.

8 Standard Eu9 G. Oettinger

net beneficiariehttps://ec.europ4-2019/oettingeand-net-benefi

he CEE reolidarity, yeed during thcountry br

wever, evecountries hang CEE citiect – that ratheir governy make themhetoric. ropean pubrope that franted, inclupport for inlonger be

figures still half of Cimage of es – 50%, – 42%, les

s – 30%, witthe exam

hat anti-Euccessful in rendum alsof contributceiving too abused bye their undecerns and s stress than opposite

themselv such as tetaken from o other puntal gaps b

This aspeg the upcsk ahead wet Commquaring the

Jakiej Unii chentre for Publi

urobarometer 8r, A new deal bes, blog post fpa.eu/commiser/blog/new-dciaries_en.

egion in theet not gettinhe refugee creaks the en some ave raised zens mightather than snments, sucm bolder in

blic attitudefor years huding in Pontegration ie a certain

show that aCEE citizethe EU (BRomanian

ss for Slovath 40% beinple of Breropean prothe long

so showedting too mulittle in retu

y populists.erstanding new challe

hat the bude effect. CEes as vierrorism or the cohesiorposes eve

between thect should b

coming negwill be, as issioner, circle.39

hcą Polacy? Kc Opinion Res

88, Autumn 20between net pfrom 25 Octobssion/commisseal-between-n

e name of g support

crisis, or if common Western

concerns t bring the showing a ch moves their anti-

es in this had been oland with n 2017,37

nty. Even a majority

ens have Bulgarians s – 47%, ks – 38% ng the EU exit is a opaganda run. The that the

uch to the rn can be . That is of the net nges, the dget cuts E citizens ctims of migration on basket

en though e regions be kept in gotiations. stated by Guenther

Komunikat search,

017. payers and ber 2017, sioners/201net-payers-

DrEuAna p

ThBieva

Cover phoFineas/VlasProof read Address | CGabriele ScSenior ProjProgram ThBertelsmanTelephone Mobile Fax Gabriele.scwww.bertel Dr. AgnieszDirector of t/Senior AnaInstitute of Telephone Fax agnieszka.lwww.isp.org

r. Agnieszkuropean nalyst in thprivate Pol

he author elecki, Bru

aluable rema

Squaring th

to stimil Šesták/foing: Elena Ro

Contact chöler ect Manager he Future of En Stiftung

+49 05241 +49 0172 5+49 05241

choeler@bertesmann-stiftun

zka Łada the European alyst Public Affairs +48 22 55642+48 22 55642ada@isp.org.g.pl

ka Łada is tProgramm

he Instituteish think ta

would like ssels correarks.

he circle? |

fotolia.com ozbicka

Europe

81-81205 5207 790 81-681205

elsmann-stiftung.de

Programme

288 262 pl

the Directome and e of Public ank.

to thank espondent,

page 14

ng.de

or of the Senior

Affairs,

Tomasz for his