spring 2012 - auc intranet - home...spring 2012 page 2 the office of institutional research/auc...

The Office of Institutional Research/AUC

LEAD and MEPI Students’

Feedback Survey

Prepared by

Ola Anwar The Office of Institutional Research/AUC

Spring

2012


Table of Contents Page

Executive Summary 3

Part I: General Demographics Information Please identify yourself 4 Gender 4 What is your cohort number? 4

Part II: LEAD Students 6

Section I: a. Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? 7 b. Please specify Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 7 Section II: Student life values: Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 13 Section III: Cross tabulations questions. 16 Section IV: Please suggest any areas for improvement. 35 Please feel free to add any other comments. 37

Part III: MEPI Students 38 Section I: a. Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? 39 b. Please specify Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 39 Section II: Student life values: Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 43 Section III: Cross tabulations questions. 46 Section IV: Please suggest any areas for improvement. 65 Please feel free to add any other comments. 65


Executive Summary

Introduction

As part of the Leadership for Education and Development Program (LEAD) and Middle East Partnership

Initiative Tomorrow's Leaders (MEPI TL) at the American University in Cairo (AUC), the LEAD/MEPI TL

program, conducted in cooperation with the Office of Institutional Research (IR) an online survey to

solicit the LEAD/MEPI TL students’ feedback about their coordinators within the LEAD/MEPI program

mission and objective. The LEAD/MEPI TL office intends to use the survey findings to improve their

program.

In May 16th, 2012 the Office of Institutional Research, emailed survey invitations to 275 students (233

LEAD and 42 MEPI). Two survey email reminders were sent on May 24 and June 12, 2012 and the survey

remained accessible until June 20th, 2012. When the survey was closed, from them there were 88 LEAD

students (37.8%) and 27 MEPI students (64.3%) completed the survey.

Methodology and Organization of the Report

This report is divided into three Parts.

Part I, general demographics’ information are presented as frequencies and as charts.

Part II, LEAD students and divided into four sections. Section I, includes the students’ evaluations to the

coordinators as frequencies and as charts. Student’s life values are presented in Section II, as

frequencies and as charts. In Section III, cross tabulation questions are presented in frequency tables. In

Section IV, the respondents’ comments and suggestions for more improvement are presented.

Part III, MEPI students and divided into four sections. Section I, includes the students’ evaluations to the

coordinators as frequencies and as charts. Student’s life values are presented in Section II, as

frequencies and as charts. In Section III, cross tabulation questions are presented in frequency tables. In

Section IV, the respondents’ comments and suggestions for more improvement are presented.


The LEAD students presented 76.5% and the MEPI students presented 23.5%. Students’ gender

was 33% ‘male’, and 67% ‘female’.

The students’ cohort number was reported as follows: 4.3% of the students were from ‘cohort #

4’, 4.3% from ‘cohort #5’, 9.6% from ‘cohort # 6’, 16.5% from ‘cohort #7’; 40.9% from ‘cohort #8;

2.6% of the students were from ‘cohort # 9’; 2.6% of the students were from ‘cohort #10’, 7%

from ‘cohort #11’; 10.4% from ‘cohort #12’ and 1.7% did not report this question .

Table 1

Students' Category Frequency Percent

LEAD Student 88 76.5%

MEPI Student 27 23.5%

Total 115 100%

Figure 1

Table 2

Gender Frequency Percent

Male 38 33.0%

Female 77 67.0%

Total 115 100%

Figure 2

Part I

Students’ Demographics Information


Table 3

Cohort # Frequency Percent

4 5 4.3%

5 5 4.3%

6 11 9.6%

7 19 16.5%

8 47 40.9%

9 3 2.6%

10 3 2.6%

11 8 7.0%

12 12 10.4%

Missing 2 1.7%

Total 115 100%

Figure 3


Part II

LEAD Students


In this section, when the LEAD students were asked “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all

students with equality?”, 65.9%% reported “Yes”, 29.5%% reported “No” and 4.5% did not answer this

question.

For the question, “My coordinator has an understanding of AUC’s liberal education system”, 45.5%

of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 35.2% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 3.4%

reported ‘disagree’, 1.1% reported ‘strongly disagree’.

For the question, “Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient”, 29.5% of the

students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’, 14.8% reported

‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.1% of the students did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD’s

overall outcomes and objectives”, 26.1% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 40.9% reported

‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 9.1% reported ‘disagree’, 6.8% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and

2.3% did not answer this question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of

activities”, 25% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.5% reported ‘agree’, 19.3% reported

‘neutral’, 12.5% reported ‘disagree’, 2.3% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 3.4% did not report this

question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting

deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation”, 42% of the students reported ‘strongly

agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’, 5.7% reported ‘disagree’, 1.1% reported

‘strongly disagree’ and 2.3% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students”, 27.3% of

the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 39.8% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 10.2%

reported ‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2.3% did not answer this question.

For the question, “My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback”, 23.9% of the students reported

‘strongly agree’, 26.1% reported ‘agree’, 25% reported ‘neutral’, 17% reported ‘disagree’, 6.8%

reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.1% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post

training assignments, reflection forms and group projects)”, 21.6% of the students reported

‘strongly agree’, 46.6% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 13.6% reported ‘disagree’, 2.3%

reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.1% did not answer this question.

Part II Section I


For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic

engagement activities in real life”, 29.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 40.9% reported

‘agree’, 11.4% reported ‘neutral’, 9.1% reported ‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and

3.4% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential”, 25% of the

students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 17% reported ‘neutral’, 13.6% reported

‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2.3% did not answer this question.

For the question, “My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed”,

34.1% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.5% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’,

5.7% reported ‘disagree’, 9.1% reported ‘strongly disagree’, and 1.1% did not report this question.


Descriptive Analysis For

Part II Section I

Table 4

Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?

Frequency Percent

Yes 58 65.9%

No 26 29.5%

Missing 4 4.5%

Total 88 100%

Table 5

Strongly

Agree Agree Neutral Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Missing data

Total

My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system

40 31 13 3 1 - 88

45.5% 35.2% 14.8% 3.4% 1.1% 0% 100%

Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.

26 32 11 13 5 1 88

29.5% 36.4% 12.5% 14.8% 5.7% 1.1% 100%

My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.

23 36 13 8 6 2 88

26.1% 40.9% 14.8% 9.1% 6.8% 2.3% 100%

My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.

22 33 17 11 2 3 88

25.0% 37.5% 19.3% 12.5% 2.3% 3.4% 100%

My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g meeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation).

37 32 11 5 1 2 88

42.0% 36.4% 12.5% 5.7% 1.1% 2.3% 100%

My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.

24 35 13 9 5 2 88

27.3% 39.8% 14.8% 10.2% 5.7% 2.3% 100%

My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback. 21 23 22 15 6 1 88

23.9% 26.1% 25.0% 17.0% 6.8% 1.1% 100%

My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).

19 41 13 12 2 1 88

21.6% 46.6% 14.8% 13.6% 2.3% 1.1% 100%

My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life.

26 36 10 8 5 3 88

29.5% 40.9% 11.4% 9.1% 5.7% 3.4% 100%

My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.

22 32 15 12 5 2 88

25.0% 36.4% 17.0% 13.6% 5.7% 2.3% 100%

My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.

30 33 11 5 8 1 88

34.1% 37.5% 12.5% 5.7% 9.1% 1.1% 100%


Figure 5


Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Please specify:

Negative comments:

1. She sometimes treat some students well unlike others

2. Students who are used to visit her office regularly are the ones who take the biggest share of

her interest. Those who do not, she does not even know their names and she does not ask

about them. For example, we did presentations this semester. Her close students got 16 out of

16 although they were not that perfect whereas the rest do not exceed 11 or 12 out of 16 and

she kept picking their mistakes in a non-constructive way!!

3. She is not fair at all and she does not equally treat all of students. She discriminates between

Christians and Muslims. She is very tough and not fair with Muslims while she is so generous to

Christians in grades, help and the manner of speaking and the way she treats them.

4. She is biased towards the feminist element in the cohort; she goes out a lot with them. She

can't isolate her personal life and her professional one. she is still very immature in taking

decisions

5. Our coordinator treats students who she likes well and gives them the highest grades in LPI.

Also, when some of us ask her about the semester abroad she tells them to give up because

they do not have the opportunity. During our presentations, some of us did not exert any effort

and they just got high marks while others who (I witnessed the situation) really exerted great

effort didn't get fair marks because our coordinator simply does not like them.

6. Yes, but she needs to try harder as some students still feel that they are not treated equally and

fairly.

7. She does not treat us equally and she does not hear anything but her own voice. Once I asked

her to change that date of Portfolio, which was only 2 days after our finals, because of the

presidential elections that were only 2 days after our finals, the same two days and we had to

travel to vote in our own governorate, she refused and only said, "I do not like to change my

decisions"!!!!!

8. She prefers some students and deal with them better than others.

9. She is completely far from equality. She loves some students, so she gives them more time,

more grades, accept their excuses, even if they do not make sense: 1- In a presentation, she

told one of those she loves, to say anything more, she even suggested for him some aspects to

mention and left him to add present them in an extra two minutes. 2- Once she disagreed with

one student and said to her, "if you do not like it, leave it" meaning the scholarship.

10. she is more biased to some students than to the rest of the students and she does not treat us

equally

11. There is a different treatment somehow in dealing with students. she sometimes ignores

serious excuses like academic circumstances

12. I think in the presentations, my coordinator was not that fair in grading the presentations. For

example, she allowed someone to re do the presentation! We did not know the rubric or the

criteria for grading. the thing was not that serious


13. I think her mood affects her attitudes a lot!

14. May be she tries but doesn't succeed in doing so. she gives some students, who are close to

her, the chance to talk with her , meet her without appointment, and spend around two hours

with them in the office talking, and others not. She takes some students' opinions about

changes in the programs and schedules and others not.

15. she discriminates between students, for example: when we did our presentation she allowed a

student to repeat his presentation because she wasn't satisfied with his presentation on the

other hand she didn't give other students enough time to present and she always interrupted

them and told them to finish and hurry because she wanted to take the bus; moreover, it wasn't

a professional presentation because she didn't pay attention to some students because she was

thinking about the bus and gave us bad grades.

16. She likes students more than others and sometimes i feel ignored while i am in the same session

with them all. She asks for some opinions and just as if i do not exist in that situation she likes to

advise students more than others. She understands some students' situations and gives them

some privileges and because she does not have the same level of information and

understanding for others, she does not give them this privilege.

Positive Comments 1. She gives us more trainings and sessions to be good

2. She is great

3. Yes, no one is treated in a different or special way.

4. Our coordinator is just AWESOME!!

5. She always make sure that she sets with every one when needed

6. Although she may have close relationship with some of the student but she treat us all equally

and fairly.

7. She's fair to all regardless of who they are or where they're from.

General Comments 1. Most of the cases all the students get the chance to express themselves freely, but I guess that

there might be a thing between agreement with the coordinator's opinions in overall or what is

known in the LEAD office community as (attitude) and LPI grades. Some of office staff face any

opposing point of view as a negative attitude while whoever doing so might be trying to tell his

opinion in brief the staff need to be more welcoming to opposing point of views from students

with open mind and students too need to deliver their opinion accurately.

2. I have not seen her treating us differently or with bias


In this section, the students indicate to what extent their life values were significant.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political

beliefs, culture, etc. ..), 25% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 14.8%

reported ‘neutral’, 12.5% reported ‘disagree’, 6.8% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not report

this question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students”, 23.9% of the students

reported ‘strongly agree’, 30.7% reported ‘agree’, 21.6% reported ‘neutral’, 12.5% reported ‘disagree’,

6.8% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not answer this question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with

his/her opinion”, 35.2% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 28.4% reported ‘agree’, 13.6% reported

‘neutral’, 8% reported ‘disagree’, 10.2% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not report this

question.

For the question, “My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed”, 25% of the students

reported ‘strongly agree’, 43.2% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neural’, 6.8% reported ‘disagree’, 5.7%

reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself”, 28.4% of

the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 28.4% reported ‘agree’, 13.6% reported ‘neutral’, 12.5% reported

‘disagree’, 11.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’, and 5.7% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions (i.e. selection process,

semester abroad, etc..)”, 23.9% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 33% reported ‘agree’, 20.5%

reported ‘neutral’, 4.5% reported ‘disagree’, 13.6% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not answer

this question.

For the question, “My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and

professional growth when needed”, 29.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 35.2% reported

‘agree’, 13.6% reported ‘neutral’, 5.7% reported ‘disagree’, 11.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5%

did not report this question.

For the question “My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development

opportunities”, 31.8% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 17% reported

‘neutral’, 3.4% reported ‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 5.7% did not answer this

question.

Part II Section II


For the question, “My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are:

integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility”, 38.6% of the

student reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.5% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’, 2.3% reported

‘disagree’, 2.3% reported ‘strongly disagree' and 6.8% did not report this question.


Part II Section II

Table 6

Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Missing Data

Total

My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)

22 32 13 11 6 4 88

25.0% 36.4% 14.8% 12.5% 6.8% 4.5% 100%

My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.

21 27 19 11 6 4 88

23.9% 30.7% 21.6% 12.5% 6.8% 4.5% 100%

My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.

31 25 12 7 9 4 88

35.2% 28.4% 13.6% 8.0% 10.2% 4.5% 100%

My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.

22 38 13 6 5 4 88

25.0% 43.2% 14.8% 6.8% 5.7% 4.5% 100%

My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.

25 25 12 11 10 5 88

28.4% 28.4% 13.6% 12.5% 11.4% 5.7% 100%

My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad, etc..).

21 29 18 4 12 4 88

23.9% 33.0% 20.5% 4.5% 13.6% 4.5% 100%

My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when needed.

26 31 12 5 10 4 88

29.5% 35.2% 13.6% 5.7% 11.4% 4.5% 100%

My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.

28 32 15 3 5 5 88

31.8% 36.4% 17.0% 3.4% 5.7% 5.7% 100%

My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility.

34 33 11 2 2 6 88

38.6% 37.5% 12.5% 2.3% 2.3% 6.8% 100%


Figure 6


[The cohort #] by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]

Table 7A

My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system.

Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 3 2 - - - 5

60.0% 40.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 6 5 - - - 11

54.5% 45.5% 0% 0% 0% 100%

7 14 3 1 1 - 19

73.7% 15.8% 5.3% 5.3% 0% 100%

8 14 19 11 2 1 47

29.8% 40.4% 23.4% 4.3% 2.1% 100%

Total 39 31 12 3 1 86

45.3% 36.0% 14.0% 3.5% 1.2% 100%

Table 7B


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 2 1 1 - - 4

50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 3 - - - 4

25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 7 2 2 - - 11

63.6% 18.2% 18.2% 0% 0% 100%

7 7 6 1 4 1 19

36.8% 31.6% 5.3% 21.1% 5.3% 100%

8 8 19 7 9 4 47

17.0% 40.4% 14.9% 19.1% 8.5% 100%

Total 25 31 11 13 5 85

29.4% 36.5% 12.9% 15.3% 5.9% 100%

Part II – Section III Cross Tabulation Questions


Table 7C

My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall

outcomes and objectives. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 2 - - 1 4

25.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 25.0% 100%

5 - 3 - 2 - 5

0% 60.0% 0% 40.0% 0% 100%

6 5 3 2 - - 10

50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 6 8 2 2 1 19

31.6% 42.1% 10.5% 10.5% 5.3% 100%

8 10 19 9 4 4 46

21.7% 41.3% 19.6% 8.7% 8.7% 100%

Total 22 35 13 8 6 84

26.2% 41.7% 15.5% 9.5% 7.1% 100%

Table 7D


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 2 1 - 1 - 4

50.0% 25.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%

5 2 1 2 - - 5

40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 2 1 1 1 10

50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 100%

7 3 11 2 1 1 18

16.7% 61.1% 11.1% 5.6% 5.6% 100%

8 9 17 12 8 - 46

19.6% 37.0% 26.1% 17.4% 0% 100%

Total 21 32 17 11 2 83

25.3% 38.6% 20.5% 13.3% 2.4% 100%


Table 7E

My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving

on time and active class participation). Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 3 2 - - - 5

60.0% 40.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 3 2 - - 10

50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 6 10 2 1 - 19

31.6% 52.6% 10.5% 5.3% 0% 100%

8 20 14 7 4 1 46

43.5% 30.4% 15.2% 8.7% 2.2% 100%

Total 36 31 11 5 1 84

42.9% 36.9% 13.1% 6.0% 1.2% 100%

Table 7F


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 4 - - - 5

20.0% 80.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 6 3 1 - - 10

60.0% 30.0% 10.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 7 4 5 2 1 19

36.8% 21.1% 26.3% 10.5% 5.3% 100%

8 9 21 5 7 4 46

19.6% 45.7% 10.9% 15.2% 8.7% 100%

Total 24 34 12 9 5 84

28.6% 40.5% 14.3% 10.7% 6.0% 100%


Table 7G

My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.

Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 2 - 1 - 4

25.0% 50.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%

5 1 3 0% 1 - 5

20.0% 60.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0% 100%

6 4 1 2 3 - 10

40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 0% 100%

7 7 4 6 1 1 19

36.8% 21.1% 31.6% 5.3% 5.3% 100%

8 7 13 13 9 5 47

14.9% 27.7% 27.7% 19.1% 10.6% 100%

Total 20 23 21 15 6 85

23.5% 27.1% 24.7% 17.6% 7.1% 100%

Table 7H

My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training

assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 3 - 1 - 5

20.0% 60.0% 0% 20.0% 0% 100%

6 4 4 1 1 - 10

40.0% 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0% 100%

7 5 5 6 3 - 19

26.3% 26.3% 31.6% 15.8% 0% 100%

8 6 26 6 7 2 47

12.8% 55.3% 12.8% 14.9% 4.3% 100%

Total 18 40 13 12 2 85

21.2% 47.1% 15.3% 14.1% 2.4% 100%


Table 7I

My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real

life. Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 4 - - - 5

20.0% 80.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 6 3 1 - - 10

60.0% 30.0% 10.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 8 7 1 2 1 19

42.1% 36.8% 5.3% 10.5% 5.3% 100%

8 9 19 7 6 4 45

20.0% 42.2% 15.6% 13.3% 8.9% 100%

Total 25 35 10 8 5 83

30.1% 42.2% 12.0% 9.6% 6.0% 100%

Table 7J


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 - 2 1 - 4

25.0% 0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 100%

5 1 3 1 - - 5

20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%

6 4 3 - 2 - 9

44.4% 33.3% 0% 22.2% 0% 100%

7 5 8 3 2 1 19

26.3% 42.1% 15.8% 10.5% 5.3% 100%

8 11 16 9 7 4 47

23.4% 34.0% 19.1% 14.9% 8.5% 100%

Total 22 30 15 12 5 84

26.2% 35.7% 17.9% 14.3% 6.0% 100%


Table 7K


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 4 - - - 5

20.0% 80.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 3 2 - - 10

50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 8 10 - 1 - 19

42.1% 52.6% 0% 5.3% 0% 100%

8 13 14 8 4 8 47

27.7% 29.8% 17.0% 8.5% 17.0% 100%

Total 29 33 10 5 8 85

34.1% 38.8% 11.8% 5.9% 9.4% 100%


Cross tabulation question [The cohort # by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]

Table 8A

My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs,

culture, etc..) Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 1 1 1 - 4

25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0% 100%

5 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 2 2 1 - 10

50.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0% 100%

7 4 9 3 2 1 19

21.1% 47.4% 15.8% 10.5% 5.3% 100%

8 10 17 6 7 5 45

22.2% 37.8% 13.3% 15.6% 11.1% 100%

Total 21 31 13 11 6 82

25.6% 37.8% 15.9% 13.4% 7.3% 100%

Table 8B


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 2 1 2 - 10

50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 0% 100%

7 4 8 3 3 1 19

21.1% 42.1% 15.8% 15.8% 5.3% 100%

8 9 13 12 6 5 45

20.0% 28.9% 26.7% 13.3% 11.1% 100%

Total 20 27 18 11 6 82

24.4% 32.9% 22.0% 13.4% 7.3% 100%


Table 8C

My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her

opinion. Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

5 2 1 - 1 - 4

50.0% 25.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%

6 6 1 1 2 - 10

60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 20.0% 0% 100%

7 8 7 3 - 1 19

42.1% 36.8% 15.8% 0% 5.3% 100%

8 13 13 7 4 8 45

28.9% 28.9% 15.6% 8.9% 17.8% 100%

Total 30 24 12 7 9 82

36.6% 29.3% 14.6% 8.5% 11.0% 100%

Table 8D


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 3 - - - 4

25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 3 - - - 4

25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 4 3 3 - - 10

40.0% 30.0% 30.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 7 11 1 - - 19

36.8% 57.9% 5.3% 0% 0% 100%

8 8 18 8 6 5 45

17.8% 40.0% 17.8% 13.3% 11.1% 100%

Total 21 38 12 6 5 82

25.6% 46.3% 14.6% 7.3% 6.1% 100%


Table 8E


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 2 1 - - 4

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%

5 1 1 1 1 - 4

25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0% 100%

6 4 2 3 1 - 10

40.0% 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% 0% 100%

7 7 6 1 2 2 18

38.9% 33.3% 5.6% 11.1% 11.1% 100%

8 11 13 6 7 8 45

24.4% 28.9% 13.3% 15.6% 17.8% 100%

Total 24 24 12 11 10 81

29.6% 29.6% 14.8% 13.6% 12.3% 100%

Table 8F

My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester

abroad, etc..). Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 4 1 2 2 1 10

40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 100%

7 5 7 5 - 2 19

26.3% 36.8% 26.3% 0% 10.5% 100%

8 7 16 11 2 9 45

15.6% 35.6% 24.4% 4.4% 20.0% 100%

Total 20 28 18 4 12 82

24.4% 34.1% 22.0% 4.9% 14.6% 100%


Table 8G

My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth

when needed. Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 2 - 1 - 4

25.0% 50.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%

5 2 2 - - - 4

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 3 1 1 - 10

50.0% 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0% 100%

7 8 7 2 - 2 19

42.1% 36.8% 10.5% 0% 10.5% 100%

8 9 17 8 3 8 45

20.0% 37.8% 17.8% 6.7% 17.8% 100%

Total 25 31 11 5 10 82

30.5% 37.8% 13.4% 6.1% 12.2% 100%

Table 8H


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 2 - 1 - 4

25.0% 50.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%

5 3 1 - - - 4

75.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 4 5 1 - - 10

40.0% 50.0% 10.0% 0% 0% 100%

7 8 7 4 - - 19

42.1% 36.8% 21.1% 0% 0% 100%

8 12 15 10 2 5 44

27.3% 34.1% 22.7% 4.5% 11.4% 100%

Total 28 30 15 3 5 81

34.6% 37.0% 18.5% 3.7% 6.2% 100%


Table 8I

My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity,

professionalism, inclusivity, studentcenteredness and social responsibility. Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 3 - - - 4

25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5 3 1 - - - 4

75.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

6 5 5 - - - 10

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

7 10 8 - - - 18

55.6% 44.4% 0% 0% 0% 100%

8 14 15 11 2 2 44

31.8% 34.1% 25.0% 4.5% 4.5% 100%

Total 33 32 11 2 2 80

41.3% 40.0% 13.8% 2.5% 2.5% 100%


Cross tabulation questions

[Gender by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]

Table 9A

My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system.

Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Gender

Male 16 9 4 - - 29

55.2% 31.0% 13.8% 0% 0% 100%

Female 24 22 9 3 1 59

40.7% 37.3% 15.3% 5.1% 1.7% 100%

Total 40 31 13 3 1 88

45.5% 35.2% 14.8% 3.4% 1.1% 100%

Table 9B


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 9 14 3 3 - 29

31.0% 48.3% 10.3% 10.3% 0% 100%

Female 17 18 8 10 5 58

29.3% 31.0% 13.8% 17.2% 8.6% 100%

Total 26 32 11 13 5 87

29.9% 36.8% 12.6% 14.9% 5.7% 100%

Table 9C

My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall

outcomes and objectives. Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 9 14 1 3 - 27

33.3% 51.9% 3.7% 11.1% 0% 100%

Female 14 22 12 5 6 59

23.7% 37.3% 20.3% 8.5% 10.2% 100%

Total 23 36 13 8 6 86

26.7% 41.9% 15.1% 9.3% 7.0% 100%


Table 9D


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 8 10 4 5 - 27

29.6% 37.0% 14.8% 18.5% 0% 100%

Female 14 23 13 6 2 58

24.1% 39.7% 22.4% 10.3% 3.4% 100%

Total 22 33 17 11 2 85

25.9% 38.8% 20.0% 12.9% 2.4% 100%

Table 9E


on time and active class participation). Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 12 9 5 1 - 27

44.4% 33.3% 18.5% 3.7% 0% 100%

Female 25 23 6 4 1 59

42.4% 39.0% 10.2% 6.8% 1.7% 100%

Total 37 32 11 5 1 86

43.0% 37.2% 12.8% 5.8% 1.2% 100%

Table 9F


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Gender

Male 8 13 3 4 - 28

28.6% 46.4% 10.7% 14.3% 0% 100%

Female 16 22 10 5 5 58

27.6% 37.9% 17.2% 8.6% 8.6% 100%

Total 24 35 13 9 5 86

27.9% 40.7% 15.1% 10.5% 5.8% 100%


Table 9G


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Gender

Male 10 6 10 2 - 28

35.7% 21.4% 35.7% 7.1% 0% 100%

Female 11 17 12 13 6 59

18.6% 28.8% 20.3% 22.0% 10.2% 100%

Total 21 23 22 15 6 87

24.1% 26.4% 25.3% 17.2% 6.9% 100%

Table 9H

My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training

assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 6 13 4 5 - 28

21.4% 46.4% 14.3% 17.9% 0% 100%

Female 13 28 9 7 2 59

22.0% 47.5% 15.3% 11.9% 3.4% 100%

Total 19 41 13 12 2 87

21.8% 47.1% 14.9% 13.8% 2.3% 100%

Table 9I

My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real

life. Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 12 8 2 5 - 27

44.4% 29.6% 7.4% 18.5% 0% 100%

Female 14 28 8 3 5 58

24.1% 48.3% 13.8% 5.2% 8.6% 100%

Total 26 36 10 8 5 85

30.6% 42.4% 11.8% 9.4% 5.9% 100%


Table 9J


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 10 10 5 3 - 28

35.7% 35.7% 17.9% 10.7% 0% 100%

Female 12 22 10 9 5 58

20.7% 37.9% 17.2% 15.5% 8.6% 100%

Total 22 32 15 12 5 86

25.6% 37.2% 17.4% 14.0% 5.8% 100%

Table 9K


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 14 9 2 2 1 28

50.0% 32.1% 7.1% 7.1% 3.6% 100%

Female 16 24 9 3 7 59

27.1% 40.7% 15.3% 5.1% 11.9% 100%

Total 30 33 11 5 8 87

34.5% 37.9% 12.6% 5.7% 9.2% 100%


Cross tabulation question [Gender by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]

Table 10A

My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs,

culture, etc..) Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 7 13 3 2 - 25

28.0% 52.0% 12.0% 8.0% 0% 100%

Female 15 19 10 9 6 59

25.4% 32.2% 16.9% 15.3% 10.2% 100%

Total 22 32 13 11 6 84

26.2% 38.1% 15.5% 13.1% 7.1% 100%

Table 10B


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 8 9 4 4 - 25

32.0% 36.0% 16.0% 16.0% 0% 100%

Female 13 18 15 7 6 59

22.0% 30.5% 25.4% 11.9% 10.2% 100%

Total 21 27 19 11 6 84

25.0% 32.1% 22.6% 13.1% 7.1% 100%

Table 10C

My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her

opinion. Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 9 11 2 3 - 25

36.0% 44.0% 8.0% 12.0% 0% 100%

Female 22 14 10 4 9 59

37.3% 23.7% 16.9% 6.8% 15.3% 100%

Total 31 25 12 7 9 84

36.9% 29.8% 14.3% 8.3% 10.7% 100%


Table 10D


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 8 13 1 2 1 25

32.0% 52.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.0% 100%

Female 14 25 12 4 4 59

23.7% 42.4% 20.3% 6.8% 6.8% 100%

Total 22 38 13 6 5 84

26.2% 45.2% 15.5% 7.1% 6.0% 100%

Table 10E


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Gender

Male 10 9 2 3 1 25

40.0% 36.0% 8.0% 12.0% 4.0% 100%

Female 15 16 10 8 9 58

25.9% 27.6% 17.2% 13.8% 15.5% 100%

Total 25 25 12 11 10 83

30.1% 30.1% 14.5% 13.3% 12.0% 100%

Table 10F

My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester


Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 8 8 6 2 1 25

32.0% 32.0% 24.0% 8.0% 4.0% 100%

Female 13 21 12 2 11 59

22.0% 35.6% 20.3% 3.4% 18.6% 100%

Total 21 29 18 4 12 84

25.0% 34.5% 21.4% 4.8% 14.3% 100%


Table 10G

My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth

when needed. Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 9 9 3 3 1 25

36.0% 36.0% 12.0% 12.0% 4.0% 100%

Female 17 22 9 2 9 59

28.8% 37.3% 15.3% 3.4% 15.3% 100%

Total 26 31 12 5 10 84

31.0% 36.9% 14.3% 6.0% 11.9% 100%

Table 10H


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 11 8 4 1 1 25

44.0% 32.0% 16.0% 4.0% 4.0% 100%

Female 17 24 11 2 4 58

29.3% 41.4% 19.0% 3.4% 6.9% 100%

Total 28 32 15 3 5 83

33.7% 38.6% 18.1% 3.6% 6.0% 100%

Table 10I

My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity,

professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility. Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 11 11 1 1 - 24

45.8% 45.8% 4.2% 4.2% 0% 100%

Female 23 22 10 1 2 58

39.7% 37.9% 17.2% 1.7% 3.4% 100%

Total 34 33 11 2 2 82

41.5% 40.2% 13.4% 2.4% 2.4% 100%


“Cohort #” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”

Table 11


By Cohort

Total

Yes No

Cohort # 4

4 - 4

100% 0% 100%

5 2 2 4

50.0% 50.0% 100%

6 8 2 10

80.0% 20.0% 100%

7 15 4 19

78.9% 21.1% 100%

8 27 18 45

60.0% 40.0% 100%

Total 56 26 82

68.3% 31.7% 100%

“Gender” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with

equality?”

Table12

Does the coordinator try his/her best to

treat all students with equality?

By Gender

Total

Yes No

Gender

Male 20 5 25

80.0% 20.0% 100%

Female 38 21 59

64.4% 35.6% 100%

Total 58 26 84

69.0% 31.0% 100%


Q. 7: Please suggest any areas for improvement:

1. She is doing her best to make us good leaders

2. The coordinator must listen to us more and she has to know that she is there to make our lives

easier not to make it more complicated by refusing our requests and keep asking us to do things

with explaining any reasons. Easier and more effective communication please. The trainings,

the retreats and the sessions we take with LEAD are not beneficial at all and most of us think

they just waste our time and we do not learn something new through them; you can see this

through our evaluation after every session.

3. 1. for the past few semesters, retreats were fun, i won't deny that, but there was minimal

benefits out of it if any, I would say budgets should be spent more wisely. like for example, we

visited governorates and discussed with governors in our first year, which is when we didn't

have such necessary skills to be able to really 'discuss' and make the most use out of the

program. then, when we were one or two years from graduation, which is when we should be

more challenged, or even given more practical and professional trainings, we only went on

outings and retreats. it was good, but it was not structured like a cohort retreat, there were no

collective or team activities that got us as a team to work with or even get to know each other

better, but every group considered it a different outing. Which i don't believe is the objective of

the retreat. 2. Major advantages, that we get as LEAD students, aren't clearly communicated

to us, like for example the option that the LEAD can cover conference expenses if the student is

participating in an international conference. I personally did not know anything about this, until I

asked, only after my department couldn't get me a conference grant and my professor asked if

my scholarship program could cover it. In the end, it wasn't covered because I asked less than

one month ahead, but what annoyed me is that this is a right we should be clearly informed of,

imagine that every student gets the chance to have one conference completely covered, which

would help much in their development, and has no idea about this. 3. I do not personally feel

that the office cares about the best for the LEAD students, if so, why doesn't it inform students

who have credits to pay that the sooner they pay for it, the better for them? why doesn't it

spend the budget in a way that ensures that as LEAD students graduate they are extremely

developed not just 'had a nice time'. 4. Why didn't the office discuss with us Islam Kamel's

case, and put into consideration he was almost done! we all know the reason he got his F grades

is that he was involved in some serious situation in Tahrir, we all believe the LEAD office could

have done more and literally saved Islam future. 5. As a graduating senior, I am really very

thankful, that I am lucky enough to have had a full scholarship at AUC, I do not want to send a

wrong message, and say it was full of mistakes. But it is not only a full scholarship! it's not paying

my expenses for buses, courses and books, it's supposed to developing me too, and I do find the

Part III Section IV

LEAD General comments


LEAD program responsible for thinking about all the ways that can develop students, not leave

that to student's suggestions specifically during finals week!. LEAD program should think of the

most beneficial trainings and events and encourage students to go and participate and LEAD and

help us develop throughout the process. I hope the LEAD program solves these issues and

provides better opportunities to current LEAD students, because they deserve better.

4. treating students with equality

5. She is the best and I’m honestly saying the truth not for any extra points :D as you know she is

leaving , so all what I’m saying is just to show how much she is amazing. i just want to say that

any word of appreciation will not be sufficient to express how much am grateful to have her as

coordinator and a friend. I'm really going to miss her and wish her the best of luck.

6. The coordinator has to look for what's best for the students and walk them through it, but not

choose the easy path that makes them in safety and waste an opportunity for them.

7. I think it would be better if the coordinator can effectively separate between work and

friendship. I think that the coordinator is a good friend for some student while others want to

keep this as a healthy work professional relationship.

8. Training should be meeting students' expectations.

9. she needs to listen to us when we ask her to push the deadlines a little bit.

10. I hope that the training sessions won't clash with important events held by the university like

the career mart in the coming years.

11. I would prefer to change her. Or at least put someone above her to find her/him when she

treats us like this

12. there should be more discussion and democracy in making decisions

13. I suggest changing her a survey per semester will not be enough. Also, I suggest a supervisor to

watch her as she is really too unprofessional especially with some of us who disagree with her.

14. She should treat students equally and care more for our academic life not only the activities.

15. She needs to be more flexible. this doesn't mean to break the rules I am totally against that but

some sometimes I feel that she somehow aggressive

16. I guess, the way of communication can be improved, no need for complementing students too

much to the extent that i don't feel it real. she can encourage us without this over

complementing We should be informed with the criteria or the rubric for the grading.

17. Our coordinator has many great and professional skills that I, honestly, benefit from. But i think

she should give all of us the same chances to express ourselves. She doesn't give me feedback,

except when I ask her! But I think it's better to give me feedback, when she notice something

about me and won't wait till she give me the LPI to improve myself. I think it's better to keep

feeding me with notices and advice to improve myself faster and better.

18. My coordinator has a non-friendly approach while dealing with professional requirements, so i

suggest that she deals with us from the perspective of understanding and being on our side and

at the same time, follow the LEAD rules and we will submit the requirements but in a more

loving way bearing in mind that she wants to follow the rules but she totally understand how we

feel and why we are asking for certain things. In other words, i need to feel her trust and care

for my benefit while applying LEAD regulations.


19. Equality between students; not to prefer one to the other. Less meetings and training.

Training, retreats and meetings to be more effective and useful.

Q.8: Other comments:

Negative Comment:

1. She is unfair

2. We need: 1-more care from the coordinator; she has never sent any individual mails!! 2-

accepting our valid excuses. 3-easier and more effective communication. 4-more organized

and effective sessions with more efficient and interesting topics. 5-mor consideration about

our busy time and about our academic life while deciding on the timing of any session or

any retreat or deadlines. 6-more consideration about our values, especially for Muslims.

While asking us for doing some team building games.

3. The rules of the LEAD program are not strict at all. When I ask my coordinator about

something related to LEAD regulations, the answer is always "It depends on the situation" I

have some decisions to make that are very important and related to a strict yes or no.

4. The coordinator should be changed

5. I just hope to feel justice even justice in applying injustice to feel that our work is not invain.

6. I guess there is also a kind of discrimination between students! I can see that. However, I did

not have something personal to be honest!

7. I don't really feel comfortable with my coordinator, because she doesn't listen to me, and if

she doesn't take my words as real. I feel afraid of her. She disappoints me every time I tell

her any problem I face.

8. She is neither fair nor democratic. She doesn't take our opinions in making decisions and

choosing retreats places or sessions topics.

Positive Comments:

1. Thank you LEAD program, I appreciate your efforts so far, and appreciate the surveys I hope

our points will be considered.

2. She is one of the best coordinators of the office. Thank you and thanks to her for everything.

I am learning a lot and changing because of the environment offered for me

General comments:

1. She needs to be more fixable and accept our excuses.

2. We should have the chance to choose the trainings that we need not the coordinator.

3. Hoda is the best coordinator i have ever dealt with. She is so professional and caring. She gives

me all the help i need and she always tries to make me realize who i am. Although it has been

only one year since she became the coordinator of LEAD 7, but i really learnt a lot from her. She

really made me grow up and look at other things from different ways.


Part III

MEPI Students


In this section, when the MEPI students were asked “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all

students with equality?”, 88.9%% reported “Yes”, 3.7%% reported “No” and 7.4% did not answer this

question.

For the question, “My coordinator has an understanding of AUC’s liberal education system”,

students reported only 85.2% ‘strongly agree’ and 14.8% reported ‘agree’,

For the question, “Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient”, 55.6% of the


‘disagree’, and no one reported ‘strongly disagree’.

For the question, “My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD’s

overall outcomes and objectives”, 63% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported

‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 3.7% did not

answer this question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of

activities”, students reported only 59.3% ‘strongly agree’ and 40.7% reported ‘agree’.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting

deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation”, 70.4% of the students reported ‘strongly

agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, 11.1% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly

disagree’.

For the question, “My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students”, 59.3% of

the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37% reported ‘agree’, 3.7% reported ‘neutral’, no one

reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’.

For the question, “My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback”, 48.1% of the students reported

‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported ‘agree’, 22.2% reported ‘neutral’, 7.4% reported ‘disagree’, no one

reported ‘strongly disagree’.

For the question, “My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post

training assignments, reflection forms and group projects)”, 51.9% of the students reported

‘strongly agree’, 33.3% reported ‘agree’, 11.1% reported ‘neutral’, 3.7% reported ‘disagree’, no one

reported ‘strongly disagree’.

Part III Section I


For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic

engagement activities in real life”, 66.7% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported

‘agree’, 11.1% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’.

For the question, “My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential”, 51.9% of the


‘disagree’, 3.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’.

For the question, “My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed”,

63% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, 18.5% reported ‘neutral’, no

one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’.

Descriptive Analysis

For

Part III Section I

Table 13


Frequency Percent

Yes 24 88.9%

No 1 3.7%

Missing 2 7.4%

Total 27 100%%


Table 14

Strongly


Strongly disagree

Missing Data

Total

My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system

23 4 - - - - 27

85.2% 14.8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%


15 9 2 1 - - 27

55.6% 33.3% 7.4% 3.7% 0% 0% 100%

My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.

17 5 4 - - 1 27

63.0% 18.5% 14.8% 0% 0% 3.7% 100%


16 11 - - - - 27

59.3% 40.7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g meeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation).

19 5 3 - - - 27

70.4% 18.5% 11.1% 0% 0% 0% 100%


16 10 1 - - - 27

59.3% 37.0% 3.7% 0% 0% 0% 100%


13 6 6 2 - - 27

48.1% 22.2% 22.2% 7.4% 0% 0% 100%

My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).

14 9 3 1 - - 27

51.9% 33.3% 11.1% 3.7% 0% 0% 100%

My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life.

18 6 3 - - - 27

66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 0% 0% 0% 100%


14 5 5 2 1 - 27

51.9% 18.5% 18.5%% 7.4% 3.7% 0% 100%


17 5 5 - - - 27

63.0% 18.5% 18.5% 0% 0% 0% 100%


Figure 14

Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Please specify:

She's fair to all regardless of who they are or where they're from.

She doesn't treat anyone in a special way, everyone is equally helped and equally encouraged to

participate in different activities.


In this section, the students indicate to what extent their life values were significant.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political

beliefs, culture, etc. ..), 70.4% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported ‘agree’, no one

reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students”, 55.6% of the students

reported ‘strongly agree’, 37% reported ‘agree’, no one reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly

disagree’ and 7.4% did not answer this question.

For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with

his/her opinion”, 70.4% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported ‘agree’, no one

reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed”, 63% of the students

reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, no one reported ‘neural’, 3.7% reported ‘disagree’, no

one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself”, 63% of the

students reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, 3.7% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported

‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’, and 7.4% did not report this question.

For the question, “My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions (i.e. selection process,

semester abroad, etc..)”, 59.3% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, 3.7%

reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 11.1% did not answer this

question.

For the question, “My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and

professional growth when needed”, 63% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, .22.2% reported

‘agree,’ 3.7% reported ‘neutral’, 3.7% reported ‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4%

did not report this question.

For the question “My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development

opportunities”, 74.1% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, no one reported

‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not answer this question.

Part III

Section II


For the question, “My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are:

integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility”, 66.7% of the

student reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, no one reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’ or

‘strongly disagree' and 7.4% did not report this question.


Part III Section II

Table 15

Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Missing Data

Total

My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)

19 6 - - - 2 27

70.4% 22.2% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%


15 10 - - - 2 27

55.6% 37.0% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%

My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.

19 6 - - - 2 27

70.4% 22.2% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%


17 7 - 1 - 2 27

63.0% 25.9% 0% 3.7% 0% 7.4% 100%


17 7 1 - - 2 27

63.0% 25.9% 3.7% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%

My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad, etc..).

16 7 1 - - 3 27

59.3% 25.9% 3.7% 0% 0% 11.1% 100%

My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when needed.

17 6 1 1 - 2 27

63.0% 22.2% 3.7% 3.7% 0% 7.4% 100%


20 5 - - - 2 27

74.1% 18.5% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%

My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility.

18 7 - - - 2 27

66.7% 25.9% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%


Figure 15


[The cohort #] by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)] Table 16A

My coordinator has an understanding of

AUC's liberal education system.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100%

10 3 - 3

100% 0% 100%

11 6 2 8

75.0% 25.0% 100%

12 11 1 12

91.7% 8.3% 100%

Total 23 4 27

85.2% 14.8% 100%

Table 16B


Total Strongly


Cohort #

4 1 - - - 1

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 2 1 - 3

0% 66.7% 33.3% 0% 100%

10 3 - - - 3

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

11 3 4 - 1 8

37.5% 50.0% 0% 12.5% 100%

12 8 3 1 - 12

66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 0% 100%

Total 15 9 2 1 27

55.6% 33.3% 7.4% 3.7% 100%

Part III – Section III

Cross Tabulation Questions


Table 16C

My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link

them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 2 1 3

0% 66.7% 33.3% 100%

10 3 - - 3

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 3 1 3 7

42.9% 14.3% 42.9% 100%

12 10 2 - 12

83.3% 16.7% 0% 100%

Total 17 5 4 26

65.4% 19.2% 15.4% 100%

Table 16D

My coordinator encourages

participatory planning and

implementation of activities.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100%

10 3 - 3

100% 0% 100%

11 2 6 8

25.0% 75.0% 100%

12 9 3 12

75.0% 25.0% 100%

Total 16 11 27

59.3% 40.7% 100%


Table 16E

My coordinator encourages commitment to

professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving on time and

active class participation). Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 1 2 - 3

33.3% 66.7% 0% 100%

10 3 - - 3

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 2 3 3 8

25.0% 37.5% 37.5% 100%

12 12 - - 12

100% 0% 0% 100%

Total 19 5 3 27

70.4% 18.5% 11.1% 100%

Table 16F

My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among

students. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 3 - 3

0% 100% 0% 100%

10 3 - - 3

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 2 6 - 8

25.0% 75.0% 0% 100%

12 10 1 1 12

83.3% 8.3% 8.3% 100%

Total 16 10 1 27

59.3% 37.0% 3.7% 100%


Table 16G


Total Strongly


Cohort #

4 1 - - - 1

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

9 1 1 - 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 0% 33.3% 100%

10 3 - - - 3

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

11 2 - 5 1 8

25.0% 0% 62.5% 12.5% 100%

12 6 5 1 - 12

50.0% 41.7% 8.3% 0% 100%

Total 13 6 6 2 27

48.1% 22.2% 22.2% 7.4% 100%

Table 16H

My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post

training assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 - - - 1

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 1 2 - 3

0% 33.3% 66.7% 0% 100%

10 3 - - - 3

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

11 2 4 1 1 8

25.0% 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 100%

12 8 4 - - 12

66.7% 33.3% 0% 0% 100%

Total 14 9 3 1 27

51.9% 33.3% 11.1% 3.7% 100%


Table 16I

My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership

and civic engagement activities in real life. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 1 2 3

0% 33.3% 66.7% 100%

10 3 - - 3

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 2 5 1 8

25.0% 62.5% 12.5% 100%

12 12 - - 12

100% 0% 0% 100%

Total 18 6 3 27

66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 100%

Table 16J


Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 - - - - 1

100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 1 1 - 1 3

0% 33.3% 33.3% 0% 33.3% 100%

10 3 - - - - 3

100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

11 3 1 3 1 - 8

37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 12.5% 0% 100%

12 7 3 1 1 - 12

58.3% 25.0% 8.3% 8.3% 0% 100%

Total 14 5 5 2 1 27

51.9% 18.5% 18.5% 7.4% 3.7% 100%


Table 16K

My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives

support if needed. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 - 1 2 3

0% 33.3% 66.7% 100%

10 3 - - 3

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 5 1 2 8

62.5% 12.5% 25.0% 100%

12 8 3 1 12

66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100%

Total 17 5 5 27

63.0% 18.5% 18.5% 100%


Cross tabulation question [The cohort # by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]

Table 17A

My coordinator encourages diverse

perspectives (i.e. discussions in

religion, political beliefs, culture,

etc..)

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100%

10 2 - 2

100% 0% 100%

11 4 4 8

50.0% 50.0% 100%

12 10 1 11

90.9% 9.1% 100%

Total 19 6 25

76.0% 24.0% 100%

Table 17B

My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with

students. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100%

10 2 - 2

100% 0% 100%

11 4 4 8

50.0% 50.0% 100%

12 7 4 11

63.6% 36.4% 100%

Total 15 10 25

60.0% 40.0% 100%


Table 17C

My coordinator encourages me to

express my opinion freely even if I disagree with

his/her opinion.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100%

10 2 - 2

100% 0% 100%

11 6 2 8

75.0% 25.0% 100%

12 9 2 11

81.8% 18.2% 100%

Total 19 6 25

76.0% 24.0% 100%

Table 17D


Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Disagree

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100%

10 2 - - 2

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 3 5 - 8

37.5% 62.5% 0% 100%

12 10 1 - 11

90.9% 9.1% 0% 100%

Total 17 7 1 25

68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%


Table 17E

My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can

express myself. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100%

10 2 - - 2

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 3 5 - 8

37.5% 62.5% 0% 100%

12 10 1 - 11

90.9% 9.1% 0% 100%

Total 17 7 1 25

68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%

Table 17F

My coordinator explains the reason behind

decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester


Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Cohort #

4 1 - - 1

100% 0% 0% 100%

9 1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100%

10 2 - - 2

100% 0% 0% 100%

11 3 5 - 8

37.5% 62.5% 0% 100%

12 9 1 - 10

90.0% 10.0% 0% 100%

Total 16 7 1 24

66.7% 29.2% 4.2% 100%


Table 17G

My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when

needed. Total

Strongly Agree


Cohort #

4 1 - - - 1

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

9 1 - 1 1 3

33.3% 0% 33.3% 33.3% 100%

10 2 - - - 2

100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

11 4 4 - - 8

50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 100%

12 9 2 - - 11

81.8% 18.2% 0% 0% 100%

Total 17 6 1 1 25

68.0% 24.0% 4.0% 4.0% 100%

Table 17H

My coordinator encourages participation

in different learning/development

opportunities. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 3 - 3

100% 0% 100%

10 2 - 2

100% 0% 100%

11 4 4 8

50.0% 50.0% 100%

12 10 1 11

90.9% 9.1% 100%

Total 20 5 25

80.0% 20.0% 100%


Table 17I

My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC

student life values which are: integrity,

professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and

social responsibility.

Total

Strongly Agree Agree

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100%

10 2 - 2

100% 0% 100%

11 4 4 8

50.0% 50.0% 100%

12 10 1 11

90.9% 9.1% 100%

Total 18 7 25

72.0% 28.0% 100%


Cross tabulation questions

[Gender by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]

Table 18A

My coordinator has an understanding of

AUC's liberal education system.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 9 - 9

100% 0% 100%

Female 14 4 18

77.8% 22.2% 100%

Total 23 4 27

85.2% 14.8% 100%

Table 18B


Total Strongly


Gender

Male 4 4 1 - 9

44.4% 44.4% 11.1% 0% 100%

Female 11 5 1 1 18

61.1% 27.8% 5.6% 5.6% 100%

Total 15 9 2 1 27

55.6% 33.3% 7.4% 3.7% 100%

Table 18C

My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link

them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 5 3 1 9

55.6% 33.3% 11.1% 100%

Female 12 2 3 17

70.6% 11.8% 17.6% 100%

Total 17 5 4 26

65.4% 19.2% 15.4% 100%


Table 18D


participatory planning and

implementation of activities.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 6 3 9

66.7% 33.3% 100%

Female 10 8 18

55.6% 44.4% 100%

Total 16 11 27

59.3% 40.7% 100%

Table 18E


on time and active class participation).

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 7 1 1 9

77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 100%

Female 12 4 2 18

66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 100%

Total 19 5 3 27

70.4% 18.5% 11.1% 100%

Table 18F

My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among

students. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 6 3 - 9

66.7% 33.3% 0% 100%

Female 10 7 1 18

55.6% 38.9% 5.6% 100%

Total 16 10 1 27

59.3% 37.0% 3.7% 100%


Table 18G


Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 3 4 2 - 9

33.3% 44.4% 22.2% 0% 100%

Female 10 2 4 2 18

55.6% 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 100%

Total 13 6 6 2 27

48.1% 22.2% 22.2% 7.4% 100%

Table 18H

My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post

training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).

Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 4 4 1 - 9

44.4% 44.4% 11.1% 0% 100%

Female 10 5 2 1 18

55.6% 27.8% 11.1% 5.6% 100%

Total 14 9 3 1 27

51.9% 33.3% 11.1% 3.7% 100%

Table 18I

My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership

and civic engagement activities in real life.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 7 - 2 9

77.8% 0% 22.2% 100%

Female 11 6 1 18

61.1% 33.3% 5.6% 100%

Total 18 6 3 27

66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 100%


Table 18J


Total Strongly


Strongly Disagree

Gender

Male 4 2 3 - - 9

44.4% 22.2% 33.3% 0% 0% 100%

Female 10 3 2 2 1 18

55.6% 16.7% 11.1% 11.1% 5.6% 100%

Total 14 5 5 2 1 27

51.9% 18.5% 18.5% 7.4% 3.7% 100%

Table 18K

My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives

support if needed. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 5 3 1 9

55.6% 33.3% 11.1% 100%

Female 12 2 4 18

66.7% 11.1% 22.2% 100%

Total 17 5 5 27

63.0% 18.5% 18.5% 100%


Cross tabulation question [Gender by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]

Table 19A

My coordinator encourages diverse

perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion,

political beliefs, culture, etc..)

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 7 1 8

87.5% 12.5% 100%

Female 12 5 17

70.6% 29.4% 100%

Total 19 6 25

76.0% 24.0% 100%

Table 19B

My coordinator encourages a two way

dialogue with students. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 3 5 8

37.5% 62.5% 100%

Female 12 5 17

70.6% 29.4% 100%

Total 15 10 25

60.0% 40.0% 100%

Table 19C

My coordinator encourages me to

express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 6 2 8

75.0% 25.0% 100%

Female 13 4 17

76.5% 23.5% 100%

Total 19 6 25

76.0% 24.0% 100%


Table 19D


Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Disagree

Gender

Male 5 3 - 8

62.5% 37.5% 0% 100%

Female 12 4 1 17

70.6% 23.5% 5.9% 100%

Total 17 7 1 25

68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%

Table 19E

My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can

express myself. Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 5 2 1 8

62.5% 25.0% 12.5% 100%

Female 12 5 - 17

70.6% 29.4% 0% 100%

Total 17 7 1 25

68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%

Table 19F

My coordinator explains the reason behind

decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad,

etc..).

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral

Gender

Male 6 2 - 8

75.0% 25.0% 0% 100%

Female 10 5 1 16

62.5% 31.3% 6.3% 100%

Total 16 7 1 24

66.7% 29.2% 4.2% 100%


Table 19G

My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when

needed. Total

Strongly Agree


Gender

Male 4 3 1 - 8

50.0% 37.5% 12.5% 0% 100%

Female 13 3 - 1 17

76.5% 17.6% 0% 5.9% 100%

Total 17 6 1 1 25

68.0% 24.0% 4.0% 4.0% 100%

Table 19H


participation in different

learning/development opportunities.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 6 2 8

75.0% 25.0% 100%

Female 14 3 17

82.4% 17.6% 100%

Total 20 5 25

80.0% 20.0% 100%

Table 19I

My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values

which are: integrity, professionalism,

inclusivity, student centeredness and social

responsibility.

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Gender

Male 5 3 8

62.5% 37.5% 100%

Female 13 4 17

76.5% 23.5% 100%

Total 18 7 25

72.0% 28.0% 100%


Cohort #” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”

Table 20

Does the coordinator try his/her best to

treat all students with equality?

Total

Yes No

Cohort #

4 1 - 1

100% 0% 100%

9 2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100%

10 2 - 2

100% 0% 100%

11 8 - 8

100% 0% 100%

12 11 - 11

100% 0% 100%

Total 24 1 25

96.0% 4.0% 100%

“Gender” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”

Table 21

Does the coordinator try

his/her best to treat all students with

equality?

Total

Yes No

Gender

Male 8 - 8

100% 0% 100%

Female 16 1 17

94.1% 5.9% 100%

Total 24 1 25

96.0% 4.0% 100%


Please suggest any areas for improvement:

1. My coordinator is perfect

2. Group organization needs to be more explained and taken seriously by the MAPI's

3. She is perfect the way she is.

4. The separation between MEPI and LEAD offices because I believe it's about time MEPI develops

its own system.

Please feel free to add any other comments:

There were no any students’ comments.

Part III Section IV

MEPI General Comments

spring 2012 - auc intranet - home...spring 2012 page 2 the office of institutional research/auc...

Documents