SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

PILAPIL JIMMY RAÑADA SSO-II/MSS-OIC TEAM HEAD 990187

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM-5:00 PM

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

07/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 07/01/2015 JOVE L. COLASITO 07/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

Compliance to ARTA requirements 10 ARTA ratings obtained 92% ARTA rating obtained 92.39% 100% 10.00

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 80 Application/s reviewed 25,936 100% 80.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained Branch Service Quality Rating: 90% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 MONIQUE S. ALCANTARA JOVE L. COLASITO 59.99 below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015_____ to DECEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications reviewed within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -Simple/Complex Corrections -Salary Loan applications -Educational Loan applications -UMID

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

INSTRUCTIONS

PART I PART II

ACCOMPLISHMENT AND APPROVAL OF PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT COMPUTATION OF THE ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND RATING1. This form shall be accomplished in one (1) copy only. 1.

2. - Effectiveness refers to the column heading “% of Accomplishment".

- Timeliness refers to the column “% Output Submitted/Completed within Commitment Date/Total Output”.

3. 2. Rating is obtained through the following:

-

Definition of terms:

- Major Final Output (MFO) is a good or service that an employee is mandated to deliver to his/her clients. - Total Score is the sum of all weighted score obtained by the Branch/Department/Office/Unit in all MFOs.

- Success Indicator (SI) is a yardstick consisting of performance target/s and performance measure/s. - Numerical Rating is the equivalent rating of the Total Score, e.g. 5.

- - Adjectival Rating is the equivalent description of the numerical rating, e.g. 5=Outstanding.

3.

- 4.

- 5.

6.

4.

5. SUBMISSION SCHEDULE1.

6. 2.

3.

7.

ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS

Unless justified and accepted by the PMT, non-submission of the fully accomplished IPCR to PMERD within the specified dates shall be a ground for:1.

2.

3. Failure on the part of the Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head to notify their subordinates on their unsatisfactory or poor performance during a rating period shall be a ground for an administrative offense for neglect of duty.

The Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) Form is divided into 3 parts namely, the Commitment Contract, Performance Commitment and Actual Accomplishment and Rating. The Commitment Contract and the Performance Commitment portions shall be accomplished by the Ratee in agreement with his/her Immediate Supervisor before the start of the rating period, while the Actual Accomplishment and Rating portion shall be accomplished by the Ratee with his/her Immediate Supervisor at the end of the rating period, based on the agreed upon Performance Commitment.

Using the Semestral Performance Report, the Supervisor shall obtain the actual accomplishment of the Ratee.

The approved Office Performance Commitment and Review (OPCR) Form shall serve as basis for the accomplishment of the IPCR.

The Ratee shall write the Major Final Output/s (MFO/s) and the corresponding Success Indicator/s (SI/s) for Strategic/Core/Support Functions, whichever is applicable. Insert additional rows if necessary. Weighted Score is the product obtained after multiplying the "% accomplished" by the "weight allocation" for

each output.

Strategic Function pertains to key program/project that has a significant impact on the OPCR of the department and scorecard of the organization as a whole, identified during the organization's planning session.

After the final rating is obtained, the Ratee must agree or disagree with his/her performance rating and shall affix his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form

Core Function pertains to an activity inherent to the branch/department/office/unit based on the branch's/department's/office's/unit's functions/mandate.

The Immediate Supervisor and Next Higher Supervisor (if applicable) shall recommend his/her approval of the Ratee's rating by affixing his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form.

Support Function pertains to either an activity that is not within the regular functions of the ratee or membership in a committee that require considerable amount of time and effort and is duly covered by an Administrative/ Office Order.

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall approve the accomplished IPCR by affixing his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form.

The Immediate Supervisor may put in qualitative comments, observations and recommendations in the 'Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes' box, if necessary.Each MFO shall have a corresponding weight allocation to be determined by the Supervisor and Ratee,

aligned with the weight allocation of the said MFO in the approved OPCR.

The Ratee, Immediate Supervisor (Team Head, if applicable) and Next Higher Supervisor (Section Head) shall discuss and agree upon the Performance Commitment by affixing their signatures and date in the Commitment Contract portion of IPCR.

The Immediate Supervisor shall submit to the Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head, for review, the accomplished IPCR within 5 days before the start of the rating period.

The original copy of the approved IPCR shall be kept by the Immediate Supervisor to serve as basis for monitoring and assessing the accomplishment of the Ratee within the rating period. The Immediate Supervisor shall provide the Ratee a copy of the approved IPCR as his/her reference.

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall return to the Immediate Supervisor the approved IPCR within 3 days from receipt of the said form.

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall submit to the Performance Management and Employee Relations Department (PMERD) the approved IPCR with ratings along with the Summary List of Individual Performance Ratings on or before July 20 for the 1st semester performance rating period and on or before January 20 for the 2nd semester of the previous year's rating period.

Based on the Ratee's accomplishment, the Immediate Supervisor shall conduct coaching or mentoring, whenever necessary.

Ratee’s disqualification from performance-based personnel actions which would require the rating for the given period such as promotion, training or scholarship grants and performance enhancement bonus, if the failure of the submission of the report form is the fault of the Ratee.

An administrative sanction will be imposed for violation of reasonable office rules and regulations and simple neglect of duty for the supervisors or employees responsible for the delay or non-submission of the individual Performance commitment report based on deadline set by PMERD.

INSTRUCTIONS

PART II

COMPUTATION OF THE ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND RATING

Effectiveness refers to the column heading “% of Accomplishment".

Timeliness refers to the column “% Output Submitted/Completed within Commitment Date/Total Output”.

Rating is obtained through the following:

Total Score is the sum of all weighted score obtained by the Branch/Department/Office/Unit in all MFOs.

Numerical Rating is the equivalent rating of the Total Score, e.g. 5.

Adjectival Rating is the equivalent description of the numerical rating, e.g. 5=Outstanding.

SUBMISSION SCHEDULE

ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS

Unless justified and accepted by the PMT, non-submission of the fully accomplished IPCR to PMERD within the specified dates shall be a ground for:

Failure on the part of the Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head to notify their subordinates on their unsatisfactory or poor performance during a rating period shall be a ground for an administrative offense for neglect of duty.

Commitment Contract, Performance Commitment and Actual Accomplishment and Rating. The Commitment Contract and the portions shall be accomplished by the Ratee in agreement with his/her Immediate Supervisor before the start of the rating period, while the Actual Accomplishment and Rating portion shall be accomplished by

at the end of the rating period, based on the agreed upon Performance Commitment.

Using the Semestral Performance Report, the Supervisor shall obtain the actual accomplishment of the Ratee.

Weighted Score is the product obtained after multiplying the "% accomplished" by the "weight allocation" for each output.

After the final rating is obtained, the Ratee must agree or disagree with his/her performance rating and shall affix his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form

The Immediate Supervisor and Next Higher Supervisor (if applicable) shall recommend his/her approval of the Ratee's rating by affixing his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form.

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall approve the accomplished IPCR by affixing his/her signature and date in the space provided for in the form.

The Immediate Supervisor may put in qualitative comments, observations and recommendations in the 'Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes' box, if necessary.

The Immediate Supervisor shall submit to the Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head, for review, the accomplished IPCR within 5 days before the start of the rating period.

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall return to the Immediate Supervisor the approved IPCR within 3 days from receipt of the said form.

The Branch/Department/Office/Unit Head shall submit to the Performance Management and Employee Relations Department (PMERD) the approved IPCR with ratings along with the Summary List of Individual Performance Ratings on or before July 20 for the 1st semester performance rating period and on or before January 20 for the 2nd semester of the previous year's rating period.

Ratee’s disqualification from performance-based personnel actions which would require the rating for the given period such as promotion, training or scholarship grants and performance enhancement bonus, if the failure of the

An administrative sanction will be imposed for violation of reasonable office rules and regulations and simple neglect of duty for the supervisors or employees responsible for the delay or non-submission of the individual Performance

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

FEROLINO JANET ALCORIZA SENIOR CLERK 090428

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM-5:00 PM

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

07/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 07/01/2015 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 07/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 60 Application/s evaluated 13,315 100% 60.00

20 100.00% 100% 20.00

10 Reports consolidated 100.00% 100% 10.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained Branch Service Quality Rating: 90% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH JOVE L. COLASITO 59.99 below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015_____ to DECEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications evaluated within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -Simple/Complex Corrections -Salary Loan applications -Educational Loan applications -Sickness/Maternity reimbursement -UMID

Transmittal lists (TL) with documents attached released

TL with documents attached released within the approved committed processing time for 2015

Reports on daily transactions consolidated within commitment date

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

F

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

LAGO SAMBITORY CANOY JR. SENIOR MEMBER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICE SECTION E-CENTER GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM- 5:00 PM

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

10/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

RUBEN L. ROMERO 10/01/2015 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 10/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 90 Application/s evaluated 3,270 100% 90.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained Branch Service Quality Rating: 90% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH JOVE . COLASITO 59.99 below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015___ to DECEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications evaluated within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -Simple/Complex Corrections -Salary Loan applications -Educational Loan applications -Sickness/maternity reimbursement -UMID

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

F

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

CLERINO LILIAN

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

07/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 07/01/2015 JOVE L. COLASITO 07/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

0.00

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 80 Application/s evaluated 100.00% 100% 80.00

10 100.00% 100% 10.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained 90.00% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 95-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 90-94.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 75-89.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 74.99-below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015_____ to DECEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications evaluated within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -Funeral claim checks -ACOP

Reports on fact of death/birth/etc submitted

Reports on fact of death/birth/ etc submitted within the approved committed processing time for 2015

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

F

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

LOZADA ROGER BACALA JUNIOR MEMBER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE 100194

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM- 5:00 PM

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

07/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 07/01/2015 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 07/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

0.00

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 90 Application/s evaluated 8,502 100% 90.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained Branch Service Quality Rating: 90% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH JOVE L. COLASITO 59.99 below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015_____ to DECEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications evaluated within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -ACOP -Pregnant Women -Senior Citizen -PWD

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

F

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

ROMERO MILA JUDITH MOVILLA SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 892859

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM- 5:00 PM

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

07/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 07/01/2015 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 07/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

0.00

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 90 Application/s evaluated 8,272 100% 90.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained Branch Service Quality Rating: 90% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH JOVE L. COLASITO 59.99 below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015___ to SEPTEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications evaluated within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -Simple/Complex Corrections -Salary Loan applications -Educational Loan applications -Sickness/maternity reimbursement -UMID

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

F

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) EMPLOYEE ID NO.

GARCIA DIEGO BALOFEÑOS JUNIOR MEMBER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE 130083

BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME

MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS CITY BRANCH SOUTH MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM- 5:00 PM

C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T

07/01/2015

Ratee's Signature DateAPPROVED BY:

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 07/01/2015 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH 07/01/2015

Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G

CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

Strategic Function/s

0.00

Core Function/s

Compliance to SLA on processing time 90 Application/s evaluated 4,092 100% 90.00

Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality rating obtained Branch Service Quality Rating: 90% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s

0.00

TOTAL 100 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5

Adjectival Rating O

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALEScore Adjectival

JIMMY R. PILAPIL 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)

Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)

I agree with the Performance Rating 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)

I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)

02/12/16 MARIA TERESA S. JUANICH JOVE L. COLASITO 59.99 below 1 Poor (P)

Ratee's Signature Date Date Date

POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable)

SECTION/TEAM (if applicable)

I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period _JULY 2015___ to DECEMBER 2015__.

WEIGHTALLOCATION

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT(MFO)

SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI)(Target + Measure)

% ACCOMPLISHED

WEIGHTED SCORE

REMARK (Use separate sheet, if necessary)

Applications evaluated within the approved committed processing time for 2015. -Complaints/counselling -Simple/Complex Corrections -Salary Loan applications -Educational Loan applications -UMID

The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with me by my immediate supervisor.

Numerical

Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofNext Higher Supervisor

Signature over Printed Name ofBranch/Dept./Office/Unit Head

Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS PMT on 02 February 2016.

F