splenda: safe sugar substitute or sweet deception?

7
SPLENDA: SAFE SUGAR SUBSTITUTE OR SWEET DECEPTION? By Lisa Weiss

Upload: moira

Post on 23-Feb-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

By Lisa Weiss. Splenda: Safe Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?. Why Should I Question Splenda?. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s7w6UHmiDw. No calorie sweetener for coffee, tea, baking “Made from sugar so it tastes like sugar” Too good to be true?. What is Splenda?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

SPLENDA: SAFE SUGAR SUBSTITUTE OR SWEET

DECEPTION?

By Lisa Weiss

Page 2: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

Why Should I Question Splenda?

o No calorie sweetener for coffee, tea, baking

o “Made from sugar so it tastes like sugar”

o Too good to be true?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s7w6UHmiDw

Page 3: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

What is Splenda?

http://www.d-et.com/eng/sucralose.aspo Sucraloseo Discovered in 1976o Comes from sucrose (sugar) but

chlorine is substituted for three hydrogen/oxygen molecules

o Not recognized by the body as a carbohydrate

o 600 times sweeter than sugar

Page 4: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

How Safe is Splenda?

o Over 20 years of evaluationo FDA approvals in 1998, 1999o Approved for use in over 80

countrieso Multiple studies found sucralose

poorly absorbed (15%)o Only 2-3% metabolizes

Page 5: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

So What’s the Problem?

o Discovered while researching pesticides

o No large scale human studieso Most studies conducted by

manufacturerso FDA denied approval for 10 yearso Studies show up to 27% not

excreted o Chlorine highly toxic if broken

downo Numerous side effects in case

studieso Actually does contain some

calories

Page 6: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

Conclusion

Trusted organizations prove Splenda

is safe.

Toxic chlorine may be

absorbed into the body.

Splenda should be used minimally, if at all.

Page 7: Splenda:  Safe  Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

Works CitedBrusick, D , V.L. Grotz, R Slesinksi and C.L. Kruger. "The Absence Of Genotoxicity Of Sucralose." Food And Chemical Toxicology July

2010. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T6P-50PCMGN-

5&_user=10&_coverDate=11%2F30

2F2010&_alid=1618282925&_rdoc=7&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_zone=rslt_list_item&_cdi=503>.

 

Grotz, V. L, Ian C. Munro. "An Overview Of The Safety Of Sucralose." Regulatory Toxicology And Pharmacology May 2009. Web. 24 Jan.

2011. <www.elsevier.com/locate/yrtph>.

 

Mercola, Joseph and Dr. Kendra Degen Pearsal. Sweet Deception : Why Splenda, Nutrasweet, And The FDA May Be Hazardous To Your

Health. Nashville, TN, USA: Nelson Books, 2006. Print.

 

"Sucralose: Is It Safe?." Nyam News July 2005. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.paho.org/English/CFNI/NyamnewsJuly1-205.pdf>.

 

"What is Sucralose." All About Sucralose. Calorie Control Council, 2011. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.sucralose.org/default.asp>.  IMAGES Splenda packet:Front:http://splits59.com/blog/?p=241Back:http://routingbyrumor.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/whats-in-that-little-blue-packet-sweet-deception-from-domino-foods-inc/