speech delivered by chief justice maria lourdes p. a...
TRANSCRIPT
Speech delivered by Chief Justice Maria Lourdes P. A. Sereno during the 2017 The Search for Outstanding Judges and Clerks of Court 26th Awarding Ceremonies on October 20, 2017 at the Manila Hotel
Thank you very much, friends. Please take your seats.
This is, indeed, a very important occasion for all of us and specially in
these times when we really need icons of excellence. So I’d like to pay
particular honors to all those whom I have always looked up to. Of course,
[retired Supreme Court Associate] Justice Bernardo Pardo. Your unswerving
devotion to your country, specially that you are Chair Emeritus [of the Society
for Judicial Excellence] and you have led so many reform programs in the
judiciary, including the MCLE (Mandatory Continuing Legal Education), I’d like
to acknowledge that now. Please let’s give a warm round of applause (applause)
to Justice Pardo. [Retired Supreme Court Associate] Justice Angelina Sandoval-
Gutierrez, of course, the pillar of the Society for Judicial Excellence. Indeed,
Justice Helen, you have taught me a lot of things. We have gone through a lot in
the Judicial and Bar Council and again I see the same stamp of excellence that
you have given to your work in the Society for Judicial Excellence. (applause)
You have my unswerving support, Justice Helen, in all your endeavors.
2
I will also pay my deepest respect now and appreciation to a former
colleague in the Judicial and Bar Council, [retired Court of Appeals] Justice
Aurora Santiago-Lagman [former JBC Regular Member, Representing the
Private Sector.] Auring, we miss you a lot (applause) in the JBC. [Hon. Maria
Milagros] “Mitoy” [N. Fernan-Cayosa, JBC Regular Member Representing the
Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)] is here. She knows how much we miss
you. Of course, we also miss [Retired Supreme Court Associate] Justice
[Angelina Sandoval-] Gutierrez [JBC Regular Member Representing Retired SC
Justices] terribly.
Members of the Abad Santos-Madrigal family; Atty. Efren Goño; M[r]s.
Rafaelita Goño [Philippine Constitution Association VP for Women’s Group]
(applause); [representatives of the Madrigal family] Atty. [Rosemarie E.] “Rose”
Opis-Malasig and Atty. Antonio [R.] Malasig, please rise to be acknowledged; and
of course, GMA Network [Inc.]’s representative Atty. Jose Vener [C.] Ibarra
[GMA Network, Inc. Research, Contracts, and Litigation lawyer], kindly convey
to your principals our deep gratitude for the unwavering support you have
provided the Society’s annual awarding ceremony;
3
Members of the judiciary; and I’d like to just say that I’m so happy that
I’m here with not only Justice Helen, Justice Bernie, Justice Auring, I was seated
with [Court of Appeals] Justice Manuel [M.] Barrios, [Court of Appeals] Justice
Mario [V.] Lopez, [Court of Appeals] Justice Edgardo [P.] Cruz, and [retired
Court of Appeals] Justice Myrna [Dimaraman-]Vidal. Thank you very much for
keeping us company. Of course, [Court of Appeals] Justice [Apolinario] “Paul”
[D.] Bruselas. Paul, muntik ka nang makalimutan [I almost forgot], but you
know I never forget you.
Members, officers of the IBP (Integrated Bar of the Philippines) led by its
President, I saw [Atty. Abdiel Dan Elijah S.] “Ade” Fajardo, who suddenly became
famous overnight. Please stand up to be recognized (applause) so everyone will
know who the famous Ade Fajardo is. (laughter) They don’t get the joke, ‘no?
Aaaah, naku. Atty. [Domingo Egon Q.] Cayosa, thank you, EVP (Executive Vice
President) of the IBP; Atty. Mitoy Cayosa of the JBC, the real better half of the
Cayosa couple (laughter); Atty. [Alicia Risos-]Vidal [President, Women Lawyers
Association of the Philippines and former Chair, IBP Committee on Bar
Discipline]; and the other officers of the IBP; retired and incumbent members
of the judiciary, specially of the Court of Appeals; members of the Society for
Judicial Excellence; my fellow workers in the judiciary; the fantastic hosts we
4
have had this afternoon, [Retired] Court Administrator [Zenaida N.] Elepaño
and [Sandiganbayan] Justice Oscar [C.] Herrera [Jr.]; the Supreme Court Choir;
all the family, friends of the awardees. And of course, people now in this table
are now famous. You please stand up for the last time so that we can give you a
round of applause, the staff of Judge [Janet Abergos-]Samar [Metropolitan Trial
Court, Branch 32, Quezon City and recipient of this year’s Outstanding
Metropolitan Trial Court Judge Award, Don Antonio P. Madrigal Awardee].
(applause) But I think [Clerk of Court Ms. Cora] Marzan [MeTC, Branch 39,
Quezon City, and this year’s Outstanding Branch Clerk of Court (Multi-Sala,
First-Level Court) Awardee] and Atty. [Diosfa C. Toledanes-]Valencia [Regional
Trial Court, Branch 150, Makati City, and Outstanding Branch Clerk of Court
(Multi-Sala, Second-Level Court) Awardee], you also have your own contingent,
right? Are your friends here also? Can we please acknowledge the friend of Atty.
Valencia? (applause) The moral support is important. Atty. Marzan. Atty.
Marzan? (applause.) Yes, okay. Such a kind of support given us in every
occasion is always, always precious in our eyes.
And so I’d like to, again, I reiterate my commitment to support the
Society for Judicial Excellence. Even if (applause) every year, I say the same
thing. But this time, I have actually conveyed privately and several times that I
5
wish the cash awards were larger. And so I think unless I get a notice of
disallowance from COA (Commission on Audit), a letter from the Society, I think
I can justify to COA why we need to increase the awards for (applause) next
year’s and the next coming years’ awards because PhP50,000, PhP30,000,
PhP25,000, maybe one blow out in Vikings will wipe that out (laughter). So
let’s stretch it a bit. Maybe it can reach six figures, ‘no? So why don’t we try?
So we are always encouraged by the fact that the Society for Judicial
Excellence, year in and year out — and this is year 26 — … underscores the
fact that there is so much faithfulness to the very important task of recognizing
excellence where it is due. And so we continue to hold successfully these
annual awards. Thanks to a group of people who pore over nominations to pick
out the most deserving public servants in the judiciary. So I really understand
fully why everyone has to get a beautiful statuette. So I hope that all those who
could not be paid for the hours that they had rendered will consider the
statuette as a sufficient reminder of the gratitude of the public, especially those
of us who understand what the awards mean as sufficient recompense.
Definitely, the request for the Society of Judicial Excellence, I don’t think you
contemplate asking for honoraria for the… (laughter) but because I know that
it is out of love that you are looking at this job of looking over the nominations
6
and asking the applicants to prove that they, indeed, deserve those
nominations.
It has taken a lot of your time, especially of the Justices who are very,
very busy with their own work to go through the nominees’ documents. I’m
sure you asked around the background and the output and the achievements
of each. I’m sure that Justice Helen, who has become a famous celebrity
interviewer now — her stature in the Philippine judiciary is something like
Simon Cowell’s reputation in “America’s Got Talent.” And you have poured
yourself [into] and proven that although it was not an easy feat that you have
dedicated yourselves to, the fact that you continue to observe this tradition
which was started in 1991, you understand that this award basically inspires
and motivates the rest of us. And I can tell you, especially the two clerks of
court, you know when I heard about what you had been doing, color-tabbing
the files and making sure [of] all the entries in the electronic courts, you know a
naughty thought entered my mind: What if I issue a special designation order
pulling you into my office so you can color-tab all my files as well? It would not
be a bad idea, ‘no? (applause)
7
I think we have to have this continuous cross-breeding of lessons. While
the electronic court system was conceived in the Supreme Court as something
that we need to do, your management skills that you had been applying even
when we were fully on manual mode, you applied it to the electronic court
mode and so I have something like just 180 case files in Makati? In Quezon City.
And just how many in Makati? Less than a hundred? 179. So just imagine if we
can continue repeating to the nation that because we started this conversation,
this homegrown talent, these really fantastic people being given all the tools
that they need, bringing down their caseload to just these manageable levels.
Just imagine the kind of change that we will create in the thinking of the
Filipino, right? And Ade and Egon, can I have your candid assessment now? If
this is the story that we are going to bring to the Filipino public, is this going to
be very impressive? Yes. (applause)
Of course, if we tell them that we have a marathoner for a first-level
judge who looks at her work as a marathon daily plodding of excellent work,
Judge Samar, then we can basically tell people that “Look, we have a very, very
revitalized judiciary, and this is the judiciary that everyone should look forward
to’ so that (applause) I am even saying, if we want the clerks of courts to have
an “O” or a “VS” in their SPMS (Strategic Performance Management System) for
8
their Performance-Based Bonus, why don’t we have a reduction goal, ‘no? And
[Ms]. Marzan and Atty. Valencia, you can basically say, “We were able to do it,” of
course we are humble, “but we were able to do it”— that there is no reason
why all the courts in the Metropolitan Manila area, specially those who have
the e-court system already, cannot reduce the docket to that much level. You
agree that this is a goal that we can achieve? And this is something that I can
talk [to] IBP with. Because if we are going to bring the SPMS which we are now
implementing nationwide first time, I want to tell the IBP, first time we will
have a nationwide metric system, never done before. And we can have and set
this as the gold standard for what we had been saying is the gold standard for
public service that we are setting in the judiciary. People will change their
mind about the Rule of Law. People will give due process a second chance.
People will say, “Let us not give up on our institutions.” Let us stop blaming
institutions, especially institutions that are fast on the way to reforming
themselves. (applause)
And I hope that the IBP will join us in this story because Egon was there
yesterday when I had a very frank conversation with the RTC judges. And I said,
“Look, we have gone a long way already. Things that we never thought were
possible [are] possible now: continuous trial system, which sends fear still in
9
the hearts of our judges and especially our prosecutors and defense lawyers
and this is being monitored very closely by the IBP, has a chance really of being
successful.”
I recognize every reform, specially of dramatic reform measures, can be
very painful. But we are not about to shirk simply because it will be a painful
moment for each of us. If the 54 pilot courts, the volunteer courts who
volunteered to go on continuous trial, can prove that there is a big chance of
success, there is absolutely no reason for any Filipino to doubt that our judges,
aided by the clerks of court, aided by the court stenographers, the process
servers, the utility workers, the legal researchers, and the court decongestion
officers (CDOs), there is one here, right? The CDOs? We can all move towards
really a very, very fast system. The only thing we need to do is to convince the
Filipinos not to give up on institutions, respect the reforms that are ongoing.
Because at the end of the day, politics will always be there, but the duty of the
judiciary is to ignore politics and to just do our job as fairly, as fast, and as
excellently as we can.
Who people will elect and who will be in political offices is not — is not
— our duty to look after. We are only going to look after the complaints that
10
have been brought before us, especially when it comes to protection of
constitutional rights. But in the protection of constitutional rights and in
ensuring that there is speedy adjudication of all, we observe what are
established precedents, try to come up with the most just decision that we can
possibly do, and in our day-to-day operations, innovate so that reform and the
speed and excellence of our work [are] accurately felt by our people.
What we must all try with all our hearts to avert is the Filipinos’ seeming
desire for shortcuts now. No country can ever hope to be a modern and
respected country if it settles for shortcuts. And it is the judiciary that can
prove that we are willing to put in, day in and day out, minute after minute, the
work that it necessary to build strong stable blocks for a modern democracy —
one that will allow our country to stay united for decades and generations to
come. And so I recognize that there is an urgency at this particular time in our
history. The urgency stems from the fact that the story of good institutions that
are working is not being propagated sufficiently. It is not being understood. We
remain the most enigmatic branch of government. My role, your role,
everybody’s role in this room is basically misunderstood. They think that we
are taking advantage of our education to put one over lesser educated people,
or those who are not within the legal system. What they don’t appreciate is
11
that we are actually the spine and the framework by which this society is not
tearing each other apart.
Can you just imagine a society where there is no law and where it is not
respected? Then that society is in a state of anarchy where everyone is going
on his own way, trying to seek retribution where he can and where everyone
takes revenge upon the other without the other side being heard at all. That is
not the society that we have sworn ourselves to build. As lawyers, when we
took our oath, we knew that we had to pay fealty to the Constitution and to the
laws because that is the only way for us to live peacefully. But people are
impatient. They want to give up on us. We must not let them. That is why
regardless of whatever storm I am going through, I have had only one message
for all the judges and employees: Focus on your work. Zone out the politics. I
will face whatever I need to face, but you must dedicate yourselves to your
work and I will set for you an example of fighting for truth and righteousness.
What I only ask of you is in your own specific corner of the world, you do the
same to the best of your abilities.
I don’t know how much time we have as a country to engage in this
national conversation where we can talk about the fundamental values that
12
make us truly Filipino. Do we really truly value each other? Do we value human
life and dignity? Do we value giving the other side the right to speak his mind
and to be heard? Is it something fundamentally important to us that we listen
to each other? If these are the values you also hold dear, then fight for the
judiciary with all you have. Fight for its independence. Fight for the fact that we
need to protect our judges and court personnel from the pressures of politics,
from the pressures of partisan forces. We cannot afford to be slack in our
defense of constitutional rights because that is the only meaning that actually
counts for us. We are lawyers simply because we value what is just and what is
fair.
So with all my heartfelt thanks to the members of the screening
committees, to the board of judges, to the trustees, to the supporters of this
very visionary endeavor that has run for all of these 26 years. I thank you for
never giving up on this process, and I thank everyone in this room for
believing that in this place that God has given us in our particular place in the
sun, we Filipinos still value the judiciary. We value its traditions. We honor its
truth. We honor the righteousness and the justice that it seeks to provide to
every Filipino. So keep up the good work and mabuhay kayong lahat! God bless
our country! (applause)