BGUWISAP - 20111

Spectral and Algebraic Instabilities in Thin Keplerian Disks: I – Linear

Theory

Edward Liverts

Michael Mond

Yuri Shtemler

BGUWISAP - 20112

Accretion disks – A classical astrophysical problem

Original theory is for infinite axially uniform cylinders. Recent studies

indicate stabilizing effects of finite small thickness. Coppi and Keyes,

2003 ApJ., Liverts and Mond, 2008 MNRAS have considered modes

contained within the thin disk.

Weakly nonlinear studies indicate strong saturation of the instability.

Umurhan et al., 2007, PRL.

Criticism of the shearing box model for the numerical simulations and its

adequacy to full disk dynamics description. King et al., 2007 MNRAS,

Regev & Umurhan, 2008 A&A.

Magneto rotational instability (MRI) Velikhov, 1959, Chandrasekhar,

1960 – a major player in the transition to turbulence scenario, Balbus

and Hawley, 1992.

BGUWISAP - 20113

Algebraic Vs. Spectral Growth

spectral analysis

ni tnt

f t f e ( , ) ( ) r r

Spectral stability if nIm 0

- Eigenvalues of the linear operatorn

for all s n

Short time behavior

1000eR

f

f tG t Max

f(0)

( )( )

(0)

Transient growth for Poiseuille flow.

Schmid and Henningson, “Stability and Transition in Shear Flows”

BGUWISAP - 20114

To investigate the linear as well as nonlinear

development of small perturbations in realistic thin disk

geometry.

Goals of the current research

Derive a set of reduced model nonlinear equations

Follow the nonlinear evolution.

Have pure hydrodynamic activities been thrown out too hastily ?

Structure of the spectrum in stratified (finite) disk. Generalization to

include short time dynamics. Serve as building blocks to nonlinear

analysis.

BGUWISAP - 20115

Magneto Rotational Instability (MRI)

Governing equations

.00,v

,4

,v-v

,1v 2

2

Bt

Bc

jBBdt

Bd

Bjc

rc

dt

d s

tzbbzB ,,v,v,

BGUWISAP - 20116

z

R0

H0

Thin Disk Geometry

Vertical stretching

z

0

0

H

R

1

z

Supersonic rotation:

1sM

r

BGUWISAP - 20117

2 2

2

dP

dt n

Vj B

Vertically Isothermal Disks

( , ) ( , ) ( ) P r n r T r

*2*

4 P

B

Vertical force balance:2 2/2 ( )( , ) ( ) H rn r N r e

Radial force balance:3/2( ) ( ) , (r)=V r r r r

Free functions: The thickness is determined by

.

( )T r( )H r ( ) ( ) / ( )H r T r r

( )N r

BGUWISAP - 2011

• I. Dominant axial component • II. Dominant toroidal component

Two magnetic configurations

0 ( , )

( , )

z zB B r

B B r

0 0

( , )

( , )

z zB B r

B B r

( )B r

Magnetic field does not influence lowest order equilibrium

but makes a significant difference in perturbations’

dynamics.

Free function: ( )zB r Free function: ( )B r

8

BGUWISAP - 20119

Linear Equations: Case Iz

zBzB2 2/2 ( )( , ) ( ) H rn r N r e

Self-similar

variable

( )

H r

0B Consider

2 2

2

( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )

z

N r H r rr

B r

2 2 2( ) ( ) ( )sH r r C r

BGUWISAP - 20111010

2

( ) 12 ( ) 0

( ) ( )

1 ( ) 10

2 ( ) ( )

( ) 0

ln( ) 0

ln

r r

r

r r

r

V Brr V

t r n

V BrV

t r n

B Vr

t

B V dr B

t d r

The In-Plane Coriolis-Alfvén System

2 /2( ) n e

2 2

2

( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )

z

N r H r rr

B r

No radial derivatives Only spectral instability possible

Boundary conditions

, 0 rB

BGUWISAP - 201111

The Coriolis-Alfvén System

n2 /2( ) n e

2( ) sec ( ) n h b

22 /2sec ( ) h b d e d

2

b

Approximate profile

Change of independent

variabletanh( ) b

1

2

Spitzer, (1942)

BGUWISAP - 201112

The Coriolis-Alfvén Spectrum

,ˆ( )( ) 0 rK K V L L

2[(1 ) ]

d d

d d L

Legendre operator

2 22

( )3 2 9 16

2

rK

b

ˆ( , , ) ( , ) , ( ) ( )f r t f r e r r i t

,ˆ ( ) r kV P ( 1) , 1,2,K k k k

3

BGUWISAP - 2011

The Coriolis-Alfvén Spectrum

13

BGUWISAP - 201114

The Coriolis-Alfvén Dispersion Relation

2 22

( )3 2 9 16

2

rK

b ( 1)k k

2 4 2 ( )ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( 6) 9(1 ) 0 , cr

r

2

( 1)3

crb

k k

Universal condition for

instability:

ˆ 1 cr

Number of unstable modes increases with .

BGUWISAP - 201115

The Coriolis-Alfvén Dispersion Relation-The MRI

Im , Re Im

( 1) 0.42cr k max ˆIm for 3

Im

BGUWISAP - 2011

( ) 0( )

( ) ( ) 0

z

z

V nr

t n

nr n V

t

ˆ ˆ( ) ( 1) 0n n

The Vertical Magnetosonic System

2 22

2 2

ˆˆ(1 ) 2 0

1

d nn

d

ˆ( , , ) ( , )

( ) ( )

f r t f r e

r r

i t

2( ) sec ( ) n h b

tanh( ) b

16

BGUWISAP - 201117

Continuous acoustic spectrum

21 1 2 2( ) 1 ( ) ( )n c f c f

2

11

( ) ( )1

f

2

21

( ) ( )1

f

2 21

Define: 2( ) 1 ( )n g

2 2 22

2 2 2

1(1 ) 2 2 0

1

d g d gg

d d

Associated Legendre

equation

BGUWISAP - 201118

Continuous eigenfunctions

1( )f

2 ( )f

BGUWISAP - 201119

Linear Equations: Case II z

B

( , )

( , )

z zB B r

B B r

2 2/2 ( )( , ) ( ) H rn r N r e

Axisymmetric perturbations are spectrally stable.

Examine non-axisymmetric perturbations.

( ) , - , , ( ) ( )

r drr t

H r H r

BGUWISAP - 201120

Two main regimes of perturbations dynamics

I. Decoupled inertia-coriolis

and MS modes

II. Coupled inertia-coriolis

and MS modes

A. Inertia-coriolis waves driven

algebraically by acoustic

modes

B. Acoustic waves driven

algebraically by inertia-coriolis

modes

BGUWISAP - 201121

I.A – Inertial-coriolis waves driven by MS modes

1 10

( ) ( )

[ ( ) ]10

( )

z

z

z

bV n

n

n Vn

n

b V

2

2

( ) ( )( )

( )sN c

B

The magnetosonic

eigenmodes

ˆ( , , , ) ( , ) i ikf f e

22

2

ˆ ˆ( ) 1 ( ) ˆ( 2) 0( ) 1 ( ) 1

d b n db nb

n d nd

BGUWISAP - 201122

WKB solution for the eigenfunctions

Turning points at *

The Bohr-Sommerfeld

condition*

2 2

*

1( ) ( 1) , ( ) ( * )

2 4d m

1MS m ˆ( , , , ) ( , ) i ikf f e

BGUWISAP - 201123

The driven inertia-coriolis (IC) waves

1 0

0

2 { , , } { , , }

1{ , , }

2

rz z

r z

VV L n V b L n V b

VV K n V b

IC operator Driving MS

modes

2

ˆ[ ( ) ]1 1 1ˆˆ( ) ( ) exp[ ]( ) ( )1

MS zr MS

MS

i d vv D ik b i ik

d

1

( )r

rdv

bdS

ln( )

dD

d

BGUWISAP - 201124

II – Coupled regime

Need to go to high axial and azimuthal wave numbers

1, zk k

22

2

12 2 ( ) ( ) {[ ( ) 1] ( ) }r z r

r r r r r zd b db db

k k k k b k k bd dd

22

2

1[(1 ) ( ) ]z

z z r rd b

k k b k k bd

3( , ) ( )

2r r rk k D k

BGUWISAP - 201125

Instability

BGUWISAP - 201126

Hydrodynamic limit

Both regimes have clear hydrodynamic limits.

Similar algebraic growth for decoupled regime.

Much reduced growth is obtained for the coupled regime.

Consistent with the

following hydrodynamic

calculations:

Umurhan et al. 2008

Rebusco et al. 2010

Shtemler et al. 2011

BGUWISAP - 201127

II – Nonlinear theory

),()1((4

1)1(

22

1

Ov

vv

b

bb

v

vL

v

v

tr

zr

zr

Ar

),()1( 22

Ob

bv

v

vb

b

bL

b

b

tr

zr

zr

Ar

),(1

)1(8

11

22

22

O

v

bbvL

v

t z

rzs

z

BGUWISAP - 201128

Weakly nonlinear asymptotic model

.)(,,3

21427

cc i

~A

Ginzburg-Landau equation

3AAt

A

Landau, (1948)

Phase plane

BGUWISAP - 201129

Numerical Solution

...)()()()()()(),( 3)3(

,2)2(

,1)1(,, yPtvyPtvyPtvytv zzzz

BGUWISAP - 201130

Weakly nonlinear theory, range I

.)(,,3

2,04])3(2][2[ 14

27222cc i

)].()([)(

)()(),(

1

)()( 20

218

74

32

176

yPyPtAb

byPtA

v

v

c

crcr

)561)((

)1()(42

2

tC

tBvz

).(10

),(9

4

),(35

8

3

32

4

AOB

dt

dC

AOACdt

dB

AOABAdt

dA

nmmn ndPP

1

1 12

2)()(

BGUWISAP - 201131

Nonlinear theory, range II

)()()()(

),()()()(

4422

3311

PtCPtC

PtBPtBvz

).(7

20

),(5

6

5

1

),(13

35

52

245

104

315

),(17

49

52

105

104

385

),()175

8

75

8(

33

4

331

2

3242

3

3242

1

321

AOBdt

dC

AOBBdt

dC

AOACCdt

dB

AOACCdt

dB

AOBBAAdt

dA

BGUWISAP - 201132

Generation of toroidal magnetic field

)]()()[( 20 PPtAb

...)()()()()()(),( 3)3(

2)2(

1)1( yPtbyPtbyPtbytb

rtdr

dbb r

BGUWISAP - 201133

Conclusions

It is shown that the spectrum in a stratified disk (the finite thickness) contains a discrete part and a continuous one for AC and MS waves respectively. In the linear approximation, the AC and MS waves are decoupled. There is a special critical value of parameter plasma beta for which the system becomes unstable if

Both main regimes of perturbations dynamics, namely decoupled (coupled) AC and MS modes, are discussed in detail and compared with hydrodynamic limits.

It was found from numerical computations that the generalization to include nonlinear dynamics leads to saturation of the instability.

The nonlinear behavior is modeled by Ginzburg-Landau equation in case of weakly nonlinear regime (small supercriticality) and by truncated system of equations in the case of fully nonlinear regime. The latter is obtained by appropriate representation of the solutions of the nonlinear problem using a set of eigenfunctions for linear operator corresponding to AC waves

c0c