specifications for omc telescope in advirgo r. gouaty, e. tournefier estimation of carrier hom power...
TRANSCRIPT
Specifications for OMC telescope in AdVirgo
R. Gouaty, E. Tournefier
• Estimation of carrier HOM power at the dark port
• Constraints on OMC waist and position of the waist
• OMC telescope in Virgo
12/05/2010 2
High Order Mode power at the dark port (1/4)
• Waist mismatch couples Laguerre-Gauss HOM into TEM 00 (resonant in OMC). Constraints on OMC waist depends on HOM power at the dark port
• LMA simulation with differential thermal lensing in input mirror substrates:NDRC cavity (gouy = 20°) – SRC zero tuning - FP cavities with Finesse = 880Realistic focal lens: f1 = 40 km / f2 = 60 kmFP cavities detuning: L = 10-11 m Same power in HOMs and TEM 00
PHOM ≈ P00 ≈ 0.1 W
• Simple analytical model: (underestimates total HOM power by a factor 4)
HOM power varies with: - power recycling gain Grec for TEM00- Signal recycling gain GSRC for LG mode- SR transmission
3
High Order Mode power at the dark port (2/4)
What do we expect with FP finesse = 450 ? New mirror transmissions
- power recycling gain Grec for TEM00- Signal recycling gain GSRC for LG mode- SR transmission
x 2 (probably conservative in NDRC)
x 2?
4
High Order Mode power at the dark port (3/4)
Gain in SRC cavity with Finesse = 880
Gain in SRC cavity with Finesse = 450100
10
1
SRC zero tuning (TEM00 anti-resonant) • At SRC zero tuning, GSRC (HOM) does not vary with FP finesse
Analytical model
5
High Order Mode power at the dark port (4/4)
What do we expect with FP finesse = 450 ? New mirror transmissions
- power recycling gain Grec for TEM00- Signal recycling gain GSRC for LG mode- SR transmission
x 2
x 2≈ cst
HOM power increases by a factor 4
For TEM 00: reduction of finesse compensates increase in Grec and TSR
Power does not change
Conclusion (with FP finesse = 450): PHOM ≈ 4 x P00
04/03/2010 6
Constraints on OMC waist (1/2)
Waist of incident beam: w0 + wPHOM ≈ 0.4 WP00 ≈ 0.1 W
OMC waist: w0 ≈ 236 μm
• Effect of a waist mismatch
Coupling of HOMs to TEM00 inside OMC (w/w0)²
Contribution to Shot Noise < 1% (w/w0)² < 0.02 x (P00/PHOM)
Requirement on waist size w < 17 μm
04/03/2010 7
Constraints on OMC waist (2/2)
• Effect of an error on the position of the waist: z
Incident beam:PHOM ≈ 0.4 WP00 ≈ 0.1 W
OMC waist: w0 ≈ 236 μm
Coupling of HOMs to TEM00 inside OMC (z/kw0²)²
Contribution to Shot Noise < 1% (z/kw0²)² < 0.02 x (P00/PHOM)
Requirement on waist position z < 2.3 cm
04/03/2010 8
Effect of beam astigmatism
• Waist mismatch induced by astigmatism:VIR-0256A-10 (M. Granata):
waists of PRM1 calculated for gouy = 20°, incidence angle =0.9°wx = 2.0 mmwy = 2.5 mm w/w0 ≈ 25%
At the entrance of OMC: w ≈ 59 μm Waist mismatch due to astigmatism might exceed the specifications!
• Error on waist position ?z ≈ LPRM1-PRM2(1/cos(i) – 1) ≈ 1.2 mm Error on waist position due to beam astigmatism should be negligible.
04/03/2010 9
OMC Telescope in Virgo
04/03/2010 10
Virgo OMC bench
Incoming beam (w=2 cm)
L1, f = 2 m
L3, f = 45 cm
L2, f = 10 cm
OMC (w=140 μm)
04/03/2010 11
Virgo OMC Telescope
L1, f = 2m
L2, f = 10cm L3, f = 45cmOMC
w=2 cm w=1 mm
• Distance L1-L2: determines the size of the waist
• Position of L3: determines the position of the waist
Tuning of waist sizeTuning of waist position