species at risk act :
DESCRIPTION
K O D A K. Species at Risk Act :. Implications for Pacific Fisheries. January 7, 2004. SARA. THE PROPOSED SPECIES AT RISK ACT. Most provisions entered into force June 2003 Prohibitions will enter into force June 2004. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Species at Risk Act:
K O
D A
K
January 7, 2004
Implications forPacific FisheriesImplications forPacific Fisheries
2
SARASARA protects wildlife at risk from becoming extinct or lost in the wild, with the ultimate objective of helping their numbers to recover.
The Act covers all wildlife species listed as being at risk nationally and their critical habitats
Most provisions entered into force June 2003
Prohibitions will enter into force June 2004
SARA applies directly to aquatic species, migratory birds, species on federal lands
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans is the competent Minister for aquatic species
under SARA aquatic species are defined as in the Fisheries Act
THE PROPOSED SPECIES AT RISK ACT
3
Risk Categories
“Endangered” “at significant risk of biological extinction”
“likely to become Endangered if limiting factors not reversed”
“Threatened”
“Special Concern” “particularly sensitive to human activities or natural events”
“assessed and OK”“Not at Risk”
“Extinct, Extirpated” “gone from the world or from Canada”
“insufficient evidence to support status determination”
“Data Deficient”
4
D PROTECTION
(Min. F&O)
ERECOVERY(Min. F&O)
Species at Risk Act:Aquatic species
Automatic Prohibitions
Permits/Agreements
Mandatory Recovery Planning
Stewardship Programs / Incentives
Critical Habitat
C LEGAL LISTING (Gov. in Council)
• Endangered, Threatened
C LEGAL LISTING (Gov. in Council)
• Endangered, Threatened
B RESPONSE STATEMENTS
(Min. of Environment)
B RESPONSE STATEMENTS
(Min. of Environment)
A ASSESSMENT (COSEWIC)
A ASSESSMENT (COSEWIC)
5
SARA - aquatic species SARA Schedule 1 now includes 34 endangered and threatened
aquatic species (29 in Pacific) - prohibitions will be in effect June 2004 (unless modified by permits or recovery strategy provisions) and recovery strategies must be developed
COSEWIC (Committee on Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada) has assessed an additional 28 species (10 in Pacific) since January 2002 - addition to Schedule 1 must be considered by GIC
An additional 12 SARA Schedule 2 species must be reassessed by COSEWIC and considered by GIC
COSEWIC candidate list includes a number of aquatic species to be assessed in coming years
Definition of “species” includes “distinct populations”; some of the above are populations
6
SARA - aquatic species (2) A wide range of aquatic species assessed or likely to be assessed
as endangered or threatened by COSEWIC are candidates for protection and recovery under SARA, for example:
Marine widespread species taken in fisheries (northern abalone, bocaccio,
salmon, northern and spotted wolffish, cusk) marine mammals important for aboriginal subsistence (beluga whales,
eastern Arctic bowhead) marine mammals important for ecotourism or impacted by human
activities (killer whales, right whale, blue whale)
Freshwater widespread species impacted by fisheries (white sturgeon) fish and molluscs impacted by agriculture, urban development,
transportation ( salish sucker, nooksack dace)
7
Fisheries implications Potential restrictions on commercial and recreational
fisheries (target or bycatch species), for example:
change fishing seasons or areas
need to develop selective gear or live release methods
Potential restrictions on other activities impacting fish and fish habitat
marine: navigation, tourism (whale-watching)
inland waters: forestry, agriculture, mining, urban development
Potential impacts for Aboriginal economic self-sufficiency and food/social/ceremonial harvests
8
Fisheries implications (2)
Delivery on new SARA obligations will be, as much as possible, in context of existing programs for aquatic species
fisheries management plans will have to include measures to protect and recover listed species
habitat issues for listed species will have to be addressed
Overall goal is to develop cooperative approaches to implementation
9
Implementing SARA: coho example
Interior Fraser coho widely distributed throughout Pacific coast abundance declined through 80s & 90s strict conservation measure established in 98 incidental catch in many fisheries
10
SARA Implementation - CohoAssessment: previous assessments (DFO 1998) expressed concern
about stock status assessed as “endangered” by COSEWIC May 2002 Status Report available on SARA Public Registry Legal listing:
DFO will lead consultations with provincial government, First Nations, industry, other interested stakeholders on adding interior coho to Schedule 1 of SARA
Minister of Environment (consult with Minister of F+O) must recommend to GIC whether to add to list, not to add to list, or refer back to COSEWIC for further information or consideration
11
SARA Implementation - CohoAutomatic prohibitions: will enter into force when the species is added to the list:
forbidden to kill or harm except under permit or consistent with provisions of a recovery strategy
Permits: harm to the species can be authorised under certain
conditions: “incidental harm” (eg bycatch); harm allowable under recovery strategy; scientific research
must show that the harm would not jeopardise survival or recovery of the species
will be based on scientific assessments of whether the extent of harm is biologically allowable
12
SARA Implementation - Coho
Recovery strategy development must be complete within one year of listing for
“endangered” species will be based on available scientific information and on
input from stakeholders, provincial governments a recovery team has been established, led by DFO SARA specifies required contents:
identify threats, strategy to address threats identify critical habitat, to extent possible… population and distribution objectives timing of action plan
13
Habitat protection: COSEWIC referred to damage to habitat as a threat
SARA requires us to identify critical habitat in recovery strategy; or, if not possible, to provide a schedule of studies to determine critical habitat
Implementation of recovery strategies and action plans
Will require cooperation of industry, to operate in accord with recovery strategy provisions
Possible access to stewardship funding to help adapt fishing methods
Fisheries management plans, permits will be modified in accordance with provisions of recovery strategy
SARA Implementation - Coho
14
Other species relevant to the Pacific
Bocaccio ‘threatened’, COSEWIC Nov 2002 listing proposal must be developed would require recovery strategy high fishery impacts
Northern abalone “threatened”, COSEWIC 1999 On Schedule 1 recovery strategy and action plan completed Fishery closed since 1990
15
Other species relevant to the Pacific
Sakinaw Lake and Cultus Lake sockeye “endangered”, COSEWIC by emergency May 2003 listing proposal must be developed would require recovery strategy – recovery team
established, process underway High fishery impacts
Killer whales – southern resident population “endangered”, COSEWIC 2001 on Schedule 1 Recovery strategy development underway
16
Other species relevant to the Pacific
Leatherback turtle “endangered” on Schedule 1 must develop measures to limit harm to sustainable levels,
as prohibitions will begin June 2004 recovery strategy completed in 2003
Sea Otter “threatened” on Schedule 1 Recovery strategy completed in 2002 Action plan development under way multi-stakeholder recovery team limited fishery impacts
17
Other species relevant to the Pacific
29 endangered or threatened Some others include:
White sturgeon Northern and transient killer whales Northern right whale Blue whale Sei whale Several freshwater species (3 dace populations, 2
lamprey, Salish sucker, 3 sculpin, 9 stickleback)
18
SARA implementation - summary Cooperative approach with fishing industry will be
essential to successful implementation This is a new Act and we don’t have all the answers: your
feedback is important as we move to implement Recovery strategies must be based on practical measures,
in line with sound fisheries management: could include bycatch restrictions, changes to gear, areas,
seasons need to ensure that integrated fishery management plans
support protection and recovery will require developing measurable objectives for recovery and
means to determine progress toward these
19
Conclusions SARA implementation will require balancing protection and
recovery of species at risk with maintaining sustainable fisheries
Decisions must be based on sound science and assessment of risks
Full involvement of affected people will be key to making sound decisions input to decisions on whether to list modify fishery management plans in accordance with SARA
requirements contribute to development and implementation of recovery
strategies and action plans operate in accordance with agreed measures
20
Conclusions (2)
SARA implementation is approaching prohibitions for Schedule 1 threatened and endangered
species begin June 2004 (eg northern abalone, sea otters, killer whales)
recommendation on whether to add further species to list (salmon, bocaccio,)
ensure 2004 fishery management plans accommodate SARA requirements (groundfish, pelagic, shellfish, others ?)
development of recovery strategies, action plans, management plans (salmon, killer whales, blue whale, freshwater species)