special education
DESCRIPTION
Special Education. Program Study 2006-2007. Our Special Education Team. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Special Education
Program Study
2006-2007
Our Special Education Team
“Thirty years ago, Congress announced that more than half of American children with disabilities were not receiving appropriate educational services. Today, American Schools have a world-class system for differentiating instruction for all students, regardless of cognitive, emotional or physical limitations. That’s quite an accomplishment, and something about which educators should be proud.” -- Pamela Wheaton Shorr, District Administration, May 2006
Special Education at LSH
The Program Study• 1st study since 1991-92
• All staff surveyed April 06
• June 2006 administrators and teachers identified expectations
• Summer 06 all worked on “chapters”
• During year worked with team of 5 reps
Special Education at LSH
Highlights of Study: Program description defines job
responsibilities of SpEd teachers
Due Process Flow Chart
Comparison to Other Districts
NWEA Results … beginning steps to data analysis; Viewpoint is needed!
Special Education at LSH
Data from MDE tells us:
Higher percentage (nearly 10%) of SpEd students graduate from LSH than State
Fewer SpEd students drop out from LSH compared to State
Avoidance of racial bias in Special Ed Identification
Special Education at LSH
STRENGTHS: Over 90% GenEd staff is willing to modify
instruction
SpEd staff provides services to nearly all special needs within the district
We made AYP in 1st year of plan
Collaboration between SpEd and GenEd is valued and practiced
Special Education at LSH
After a year of study, we are here to
offer the top ten special education
challenges that affect schools
in Le Sueur-Henderson,
with our solutions for each.
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #1(not in priority order)
STANDARDS - a Two-Fold Challenge:
SpEd teachers deliver Academic Standards at many grade levels and in many content areas -- for students with different disabilities and widely divergent needs
Find texts and tools to meet the standards while matching and/or accommodating individual student learning needs
Our Solution
Meet with General Education teachers to brainstorm ideas and resources
Evaluate possible resources
Order materials
Use materials with students
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #2(not in priority order)
Following legal protocols for mandated DUE PROCESS PAPERWORK
• Assessment, conducting student evaluations
• IEP reports
• Progress reports
• Maintaining files
• Team meeting preparation and follow-up
• Third Party Billing
Prep time for instructional planning and collaborating with GenEd gets eaten up with paperwork and compliance
Our Solution
Meet with district administrators to develop solutions
Implement the recommendations
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #3(not in priority order)
TECHNOLOGY Develop student skills in technology to
prepare for life
Getting the equipment that works with current tech requirements into the Special Ed classrooms
Purchasing software that will have the greatest impact on student achievement
Our Solution
Work with district tech team to determine needs
Request software funds to “catch up”
Review needs and make recommendations annually
Be part of the technology rotation
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #4(not in priority order)
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Addressing Assistive Technology use is required as part of the IEP process
Our staff needs to learn more about assistive technology and how it benefits our students
Our Solution
Invite outside experts Thanks to Closing the
Gap! Request Assistive
Technology evaluation of needs (MVED)
Select and purchase Access training on
selected technology
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #5(not in priority order)
TEAMING WITH GENERAL ED
Continued need to communicate and collaborate with general ed staff for• Student Programming
• Modifications
• Accommodations
• Progress
• Differentiating in the classroom
Our Solution
Include special ed rep on all curriculum area reviews
Expand co-teaching pilot
Continue participation in Time for Teams
Continue August collaboration meetings for SpEd and GenEd
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #6(not in priority order)
Information Overload!• New mandates / IDEIA• Statewide Testing Requirements
Need site, district, Ed District support• Knowledge of SpEd teachers’ responsibilities• Current Best Practices and Good Job Design• Access to specially designed instructional resources
Without this help, we do it ourselves and:• We Lose student contact time• Our energies are focused on program management
HELPWANTED
Our Solution
Request MVED leadership attend our Child Study meetings
Frequent classroom visits Centralized training from
MVED for districts Centralized speakers Monthly 1/2 day Info
meetings with school reps
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #7(not in priority order)
ACHIEVEMENT MEASURES
IDIEA reauthorization requires • research-based assessments• accountability for achievement and recording
progress
District initiatives• using Formative Assessment• Using Data to Inform instruction
Our Solution
Request District Staff Development Team include training in formative assessments in 07-08
Learn how to use Sagebrush for tracking and analyzing student achievement
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #8(not in priority order)
New IDEIA (Individuals with Disabilities Education
Improvement Act) also requires that instruction in
special education program and relatedservices provided in the IEP
must be
research-based
Our Solution
Reach out to MSUM partners
Teachers investigate tools & strategies this summer
Seek training on new tools & strategies
Request subscriptions to professional journals
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #9(not in priority order)
DISTRICT-WIDE COMMUNICATIONSpecial Educators often work alone, in isolation. They need:
• Time to collaborate with each other about strategies and tools
• Time to engage in meaningful conversations about their job and job stress
• A forum for thinking through and discussing conflict, confusion, and the demands of their jobs
Our Solution
Meet as a K-12 team in August retreat
Meet consistently throughout the year with agendas set by the team
Special Ed’s Greatest Challenge #10(not in priority order)
EFFECTIVE STAFFING DECISIONS
Challenge presented by administrators in June 2006:
• Can we describe the Special Ed workload in quantifiable terms?
• What is an objective way to determine assignments and staffing in SpEd?
Our Solution
Develop a workload analysis based on services and responsibilities of each teacher based on a design in place in Hastings
Create a spreadsheet to calculate workload ratios which could be easily revised
Work with administration to interpret data and refine the model as needed.
Special Education at LSH
The Mission of Special Education
at LSH is to
empower studentswith complex social and educational challenges
to recognize and optimizetheir full potential.
Special Education at LSH
Questions?
Special Education Student Percentages 2006-2007
(Not including Speech-Language)
11.70%13.79%
18.50%
23.26%
10.81%
18.18%
12.70%
22.22%
15.31%
11.86%
7.87%
11.48%10.28%
12.84%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
StateAveDistrict
Ave GR 1 GR 2 GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 GR 9GR 10 GR 11 GR 12
Grade
# of Students
Special Education Student Percentages 2006-2007
(Not including Speech-Language)
18.50%
23.26%
10.81%
18.18%
12.70%
22.22%
15.31%
11.86%10.28%
12.84%11.48%
7.87%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
GR 1 GR 2 GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 GR 9GR 10 GR 11 GR 12
Grade
# of Students
Percentage Breakdown by Disability(Not including Speech-Language)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
StateDistrict
GR 1GR 2GR 3GR 4GR 5GR 6GR 7GR 8GR 9GR 10GR 11GR 12
Grade
Percentage
OTHERASDDCDOHDEBDSLD
Special Education Students by Disability
12
3 1 1 2 2 1 1
1
2
7
47
3
10
25
2
64
1
4
2
2
3
3
22
61
3
3
5
1
4
5 24
3
1
1
1
14
11
1
1
1
1
1
31
1
5
1
1
1
6
4
4
0
5
10
15
20
25
ECSE
K
GR 1 GR 2 GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 GR 9GR 10GR 11GR 12
Grade
# of Students
OTHER
ASD
DCD
OHD
EBD
SLD
Speech/Lang.
Dev. Delay