s&p ratings report 170m pedfa bonds

Upload: emily-previti

Post on 04-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 S&P Ratings Report 170M PEDFA Bonds

    1/5

  • 8/13/2019 S&P Ratings Report 170M PEDFA Bonds

    2/5

    Summary:

    Pennsylvania Economic Development FinancingAuthority

    Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; GeneralObligation

    Credit Profile

    US$98.998 mil jr gtd parking rev bnds (Dauphin Cnty) (Capitol Region Parking Sys) ser 2013B 1-4 due 01/01/2054

    Long Term Rating AA/Stable New

    US$70.999 mil jr insured/gtd parking rev bnds (Dauphin Cnty) (Capitol Region Parking Sys) ser 2013C 1-3 due 01/01/2054

    Long Term Rating AA/Stable New

    Rationale

    Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'AA' long-term rating and stable outlook to Pennsylvania Economic

    Development Financing Authority's (PEDFA's) parking system revenue bonds (Capitol Region Parking System) series

    2013B junior guaranteed parking revenue bonds and 2013C junior insured/guaranteed parking revenue bonds. At the

    same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed its 'AA' rating, with a stable outlook, on Dauphin County's general obligation

    (GO) bonds outstanding.

    The rating is based on Dauphin County, Pa.'s GO pledge. The series B and C bonds are junior-lien bonds, payable from

    parking revenues after operating expenses and series A debt service. The series A bonds have a senior lien and will be

    paid from parking revenues, including a parking lease with the commonwealth's department of general services (DGS)

    for more than 50% of off-street spaces within the parking system, which consists of 7,694 off-street spaces and 1,260

    on-street spaces (for more information on the series A bonds, please refer to the analysis published Dec. 3, 2013, on

    RatingsDirect). Pursuant to the series 2013B guaranty agreement, Dauphin County will pledge its full faith, credit, and

    taxing power for the budgeting and appropriation and punctual payment of debt service on the series B bonds.

    Pursuant to the series 2013C guaranty agreement, in the event that Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. (AGM) fails to

    make debt service payments under the terms of the bond insurance policy, the county is pledging its full faith, credit,

    and taxing power for the budgeting, appropriation, and payment of debt service.

    The trust estate for the bonds consists of parking revenues excluding gross receipts taxes payable to Harrisburg and

    parking lease payments from the DGS; a first-priority lien on the open-end leasehold mortgage, security agreement,

    fixture filing, and assignment of leases and rents; and the authority's rights under the asset transfer agreement, the

    lease, the DGS parking lease, and the PEDFA intergovernmental cooperation and servicing agreements. The

    authority's annual rate covenant consists of two tests. One is that parking system revenue is sufficient to cover current

    expenses, debt service on the bonds, replenishment of debt service reserve funds (if any), asset manager performance

    and operator performance fees, city payments and additional rent, sums payable to the authority, and amounts needed

    WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT DECEMBER 3, 2013 2

    1223342 | 301020913

  • 8/13/2019 S&P Ratings Report 170M PEDFA Bonds

    3/5

    to maintain the capital reserve requirement. The other part of the rate covenant is that revenues net of current

    expenses are not less than 125% of the debt service on all bonds (series A, B, and C bonds). A rate covenant violation

    may not be an event of default under the indenture, if certain remedial procedures are followed. The additional bonds

    test for the series A bonds requires that PEDFA demonstrate 3.0x debt service coverage (based on gross revenues) of

    the current and proposed senior bonds. Any additional debt for series A, B, or C bonds is subject to county and AGM

    consent.

    Debt service on the series B and C junior-lien bonds escalates from approximately $6.6 million in 2015 to $11.8 million

    in 2044 (year 30) after which the series A bonds are retired. From 2045 (year 31) onward to final maturity in 2054 (year

    40), debt service is level at approximately $24.1 million, assuming mandatory sinking fund payments. The full debt

    service payment represents 6% of the county's adjusted 2012 governmental fund expenditures, escalated at 2% per

    year.

    The PEDFA bonds are being issued concurrently with Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority's

    (LCSWMA) series 2013A and B bonds as part of the "Harrisburg Strong" recovery plan approved by the

    commonwealth legislature (and filed by the office of the receiver created by the commonwealth legislature) to set the

    city on a sustainable fiscal path. We understand that the two transactions should generate approximately $400 million

    in net proceeds, which together with various concessions, will defease all of the Harrisburg Authority's Resource

    Recovery Facility's (RRF) existing debt at closing. Harrisburg's leveraging of the RRF and its required debt service

    payments were primary drivers of its fiscal stress. The city stopped making payment on the RRF bonds, which resulted

    in Dauphin County stepping in with its second guaranty on the series 2003D and E bonds for which it has paid more

    than $25 million to date, with total principal of $105 million still outstanding. Dauphin County also provided a working

    capital loan of $34.685 million by issuing a bond anticipation note through PNC Bank to avoid a default under the 2007

    indenture. For more information on the LCSWMA bonds, please refer to the analyses published Oct. 29, 2013 and Nov.

    28, 2013, respectively, on RatingsDirect.

    In addition to defeasing the existing RRF debt, the transaction will repay the county's working capital note and provide

    reimbursement of $8.5 million for guaranty payments made in 2013. In the longer term, residual parking revenues after

    the series B and C bonds are repaid will reimburse the county $20 million for guaranty payments made and other

    expenses incurred; however, this is unlikely to occur until approximately year 35 of the transaction.

    The 'AA' GO rating on Dauphin County reflects our assessment of the following credit factors:

    Strong local economy based on the broad and diverse Harrisburg metropolitan statistical area, which serves as the

    state capital and county seat;

    Strong budgetary flexibility albeit with the potential for drawdowns over the next two years;

    Adequate budgetary performance in fiscal 2012;

    Very strong liquidity, with strong access to external liquidity;

    Very weak debt and contingent liability profile; and

    Strong management based on existing policies.

    For more information on the GO rating, please refer to the analysis published Nov. 28, 2013, on RatingsDirect.

    WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT DECEMBER 3, 2013 3

    1223342 | 301020913

    Summary: Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; GeneralObligation

  • 8/13/2019 S&P Ratings Report 170M PEDFA Bonds

    4/5

    Outlook

    The stable outlook reflects our view of Dauphin County's stable local economy and proven willingness to support its

    debt and contingency obligations. We believe that the proposed PEDFA and LCSWMA transactions will reduce the

    county's liquidity risk and provide budgetary relief in the near term; however, longer term contingent liability riskremains if parking revenues are insufficient to make debt service payments or if flow control legislation is not

    extended. It is our view that the county will continue to take the actions necessary to reduce these risks. While we do

    not anticipate raising the rating within the two-year outlook horizon, we could lower the rating if the county fails to

    maintain available reserves at target levels and restore structural balance. We believe that a high degree of budgetary

    flexibility is necessary for the county, given its exposure to contingent liabilities.

    Related Criteria And Research

    Related Criteria

    USPF Criteria: Local Government GO Ratings Methodology And Assumptions, Sept. 12, 2013

    USPF Criteria: Contingent Liquidity Risks, March 5, 2012

    Related Research

    S&P Public Finance Local GO Criteria: How We Adjust Data For Analytic Consistency, Sept. 12, 2013

    Ratings Detail (As Of December 3, 2013)

    Dauphin Cnty GO

    Long Term Rating AA/Stable Affirmed

    Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings

    affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use

    the Ratings search box located in the left column.

    WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT DECEMBER 3, 2013 4

    1223342 | 301020913

    Summary: Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; GeneralObligation

  • 8/13/2019 S&P Ratings Report 170M PEDFA Bonds

    5/5

    S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P

    reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,

    www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com

    (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information

    about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

    S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective

    activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established

    policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

    To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain

    regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P

    Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any

    damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

    Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and

    not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase,

    hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to

    update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment

    and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does

    not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be

    reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

    No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part

    thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval

    system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be

    used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or

    agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not

    responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for

    the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL

    EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR

    A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING

    WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no

    event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential

    damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused bynegligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

    Copyright 2013 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.

    WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT DECEMBER 3, 2013 5

    1223342 | 301020913