south staffordshire council sad...i south staffordshire site allocations dpd – options...
TRANSCRIPT
South Staffordshire Council
South Staffordshire Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Options Consultation (March 2014) Habitats Regulations Assessment Review March 2014
i
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Notice
This report is prepared by Atkins Limited for the sole and exclusive use of South Staffordshire Council in response to their particular instructions. No liability is accepted for any costs claims or losses arising from the use of this report or any part thereof for any purpose other than that for which it was specifically prepared or by any party other than South Staffordshire Council. No information provided in this report can be considered to be legal advice.
Document History
JOB NUMBER: 5079339.004
DOCUMENT REF: P:\GBBMA\DE2\Div54\Ecology Jobs\5079339 South Staffs HRA work (CES)\004\40\Reporting\South Staffordshire Allocations DPD - HRA Review - Final Draft to Client.docx
Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date
1 Draft for Client Comment C Sellars - J Box J Box 15/06/12
2 For client issue J Glossop M Oakley J Box J Box 14/02/14
ii
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Table of Contents
Section Pages
1. Introduction and Background 1
Background to this Assessment 1 Background to Habitats Regulations Assessment 1 Outline of this HRA Review Report 2
2. Methodology 3
The Plan 3 Determination of the International Sites included in the HRA 3 Obtaining Information on International Sites with the Potential to be Affected 4 Review of the DPD 4 Information Used to Inform HRA Review 5 Consultation 6 Assessing the Likely Significant Effects of the Plan 6
3. The International Sites 7
4. Plan Details 11
5. Findings of the HRA Review 13
Groundwater Flows 13 Summary of Key Findings 14
6. Recommendations 24
7. Conclusions 27
Tables
Table 3.1: Information about Mottey Meadows SAC 7 Table 3.2: Information about Cannock Chase SAC 8 Table 3.3: Information about Cannock Extension Canal SAC 9 Table 5.1: Results of the HRA Review 15
Appendices
Appendix A: Response from Environment Agency in relation to Humber Estuary and Severn Estuary International Sites 30
Appendix B: Environment Agency Confirmation of No Likely Significant Effects on Cannock Chase SAC from Reduced Abstraction Rates at Milford and Bednall 31
1
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
1. Introduction and Background
Background to this Assessment
1.1. This Habitats Regulations Assessment Review has been carried out by Atkins Limited (Atkins) on behalf of South Staffordshire Council for the South Staffordshire Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Issues & Options Consultation (March 2014).
1.2. The Site Allocations Document – Issues and Options Consultation is hereafter referred to as the DPD. The DPD contains a total 133 potential allocation sites in sixteen locations across South Staffordshire. The allocation sites identified are potential sites only that are currently being considered by the Council for future housing and employment development. This is a high level strategic document that will be issued for public consultation (in March 2014) in order to determine the final list of allocation sites to be included in the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document.
1.3. The allocation sites identified in the DPD conform to the proposed distribution of housing identified in the South Staffordshire Core Strategy
1 and the sites identified as suitable in the
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA)2
. The Issues and Options Consultation DPD is based on these documents in order identify the final allocation sites (i.e. those that are most suitable and sustainable) for inclusion in the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document.
1.4. The Options Consultation DPD will be put out for public consultation in March 2014. The Consultation DPD will be split into five documents, one for each locality within the district, with specific workshops for each locality. The consultation will run for a minimum of 12 weeks.
Background to Habitats Regulations Assessment
1.5. Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA) is required by Regulation 61 the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) (the Habitat Regulations) for all plans and projects which may have likely significant effects on European sites and are not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the European site. The Habitats Regulations state that projects and/or plans must be assessed in combination with other projects and plans. Although impacts from an individual project or plan may have no likely significant effect on an international site, cumulative impacts from other plans and projects may result in an in combination effect on one or more interest features of the international site
3.
1.6. European sites include Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), candidate SACs (cSAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA). HRA is also required, as a matter of UK Government policy, for potential SPAs (pSPA), possible SACs (pSAC) and proposed and listed Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar sites) for the purposes of considering plans and projects which may affect them
4. Hereafter all of the above designated nature conservation sites are
referred to as ‘international sites’.
1.7. The stages of HRA process are:
Stage 1 – Screening: To test whether a plan or project either alone or in combination with
other plans and projects is likely to have a significant effect on an international site;
Stage 2 – Appropriate Assessment: To determine whether, in view of an international
site’s conservation objectives, the plan (either alone or in combination with other projects
1 South Staffordshire Core Strategy Development Plan Document (Adopted 11
th December 2012)
2 South Staffordshire Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2013)
3 Habitat Regulations Guidance Note 4: Alone or In Combination, English Nature, May 2001.
4 Paragraph 118 of National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012)
2
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
and plans) would have an adverse effect (or risk of this) on the integrity of the site with
respect to the structure, function and conservation objectives of the international site. If
adverse impacts are anticipated , potential mitigation measures to alleviate impacts should
be proposed and assessed;
Stage 3 – Assessment of alternative solutions: Where a plan is assessed as having an
adverse impact (or risk of this) on the integrity of an international site, there should be an
examination of alternatives (e.g. alternative locations and designs of development); and,
Stage 4 – Assessment where no alternative solutions remain and where adverse
impacts remain: In exceptional circumstance (e.g. where there are imperative reasons of
overriding public interest), compensatory measures to be put in place to offset negative
impacts.
HRA Review
1.8. This report completes a review of each of the allocation sites within the DPD, undertaken as part of the initial stages of HRA Stage 1 screening process. This HRA Review will highlight whether any of the allocation sites are likely to lead to significant effects on the international sites within and adjacent to South Staffordshire. The HRA Review also makes recommendations, where relevant, on how likely significant effects could be avoided (e.g. by excluding certain allocation sites from the future Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document). Recommendations are also made for any additional information that should be included in the Publication Document of the DPD to help prevent likely significant effects on international sites occurring when this final draft of the DPD is produced.
1.9. The potential for likely significant effects of the Plan on the Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC in combination with other projects and plans have not been considered in this HRA Review. This is because the purpose of this document is to review the effects of the DPD alone and to make recommendations about how the Plan can be amended going forward to avoid any likely significant effects.
1.10. The HRA Review will help to satisfy Natural England (and other statutory bodies) that the HRA process is being followed and that due consideration has been paid to the Habitat Regulations throughout the development of the Site Allocations DPD.
1.11. Stage 1 of the HRA process (Screening) will be completed once the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document has been produced.
Outline of this HRA Review Report
1.12. Following this introduction:
Section 2 of this report sets out the methodology used for the HRA Review;
Section 3 provides details relating to the international sites (including their Conservation
Objectives and site sensitivities);
Section 4 outlines details of the DPD;
Section 5 details the results of the HRA Review for the international sites;
Section 6 provides recommendations for the Publication Document of DPD; and,
Section 7 provides the conclusions of the HRA Review.
3
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
2. Methodology
The Plan
2.1. The first step of the HRA process is to gather all available information regarding the Site Allocations DPD. This information is pivotal for the analysis of the DPD and its impact on international sites.
2.2. This includes a review of the Plan to determine if any of the proposals within the DPD are directly connected with, or necessary to, the nature conservation management of the international sites included in the HRA process.
2.3. A summary of the DPD and its contents is given in Section 4.
Determination of the International Sites included in the HRA
2.4. The international sites that should be included in the HRA must also be identified. An initial review of the Plan in light of the Habitats Regulations was undertaken at the beginning of the HRA Review process. This initial review looked at the geographic extent or zone of influence of any impacts which could arise as a result of the Plan and considered which international sites should be included within the assessment.
2.5. All international sites within South Staffordshire and up to 20 km from its boundaries were identified
5. There is one international site within South Staffordshire: the Mottey Meadows SAC.
This site is designated for its lowland hay meadows.
2.6. There are also an additional six international sites present within 20 km of the South Staffordshire district boundary:
Cannock Chase SAC: Located directly adjacent to the north-eastern boundary of South
Staffordshire;
Cannock Extension Canal SAC: Located approximately 750 m east of South Staffordshire,
near Wyrley Common, Cannock;
Fens Pools SAC: Located approximately 2.5 km east of South Staffordshire, in Pensnett,
Dudley;
Midland Meres and Mosses Ramsar Site (Phase 2 site): Located approximately 4.2 km
north of South Staffordshire, near Newport, Stafford;
Pasturefields Saltmarsh SAC: Located approximately 6.1 km north-east of South
Staffordshire, near Hixon, Stafford; and,
West Midland Mosses SAC: Located approximately 10 km north-east of South
Staffordshire, near Stowe-by-Chartley, Stafford.
2.7. There are no cSACs, pSPAs or pRamsar sites present within South Staffordshire or within 20 km of the boundary of South Staffordshire.
5 The Environment Agency Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) and Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) guidance
notes that a proposal to construct an coal or oil fired power station should consider impacts on European sites up to 15 km away (Page 4 of the Habitats Directive – Work Instruction: Appendix 7 Technical and Procedural Issues Specific to IPC and PPC produced by the Environment Agency in July 2004). The most recent England Leisure Visits report states that people will travel up to 17.3 km to a countryside destination (England Leisure Visits: Summary of the 2005 Leisure Visits Survey, Natural England, 2005). These distances have been rounded up to 20
km on a precautionary basis to ensure that all sites that may be impacted by a new development are considered as part of the HRA process.
4
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
2.8. The allocation sites within the DPD are of a localised nature and focus on an increase in housing and employment in the district. Significant effects from the Plan are considered very unlikely to extend far beyond the Plan boundary. There are unlikely to be significant emissions to air or water which could be generated through developments such as large scale power stations, quarry operations and large scale pig or poultry units as allocation sites for these types of development are not included in any of allocations present in the DPD.
2.9. It is recognised that indirect effects such as recreational pressures may lead to effects outside of the Plan boundary and there are some international sites which may have features that are sensitive to disturbance. The following international sites have been eliminated from the HRA Review process because the sites are not considered to be vulnerable to recreational or disturbance effects from allocations within the DPD: Midland Meres and Mosses Ramsar Site (Phase 2 site), Pasturefields Saltmarsh SAC and West Midland Mosses SAC. This is because the allocations in the Core Strategy and the nature of the designated features of these international sites are such that it is extremely unlikely that there will be any likely significant effects on these sites given their distance from the boundary of South Staffordshire.
2.10. The Fens Pools SAC is designated for its population of great crested newts, a European protected species. The vulnerabilities of the SAC relate to water quality, loss of terrestrial habitat and changes to ponds used by great crested newts to breed within (e.g. through desiccation, human disturbance, fish introductions and pollution). Due to distance and the lack of links between the Plan boundary and the SAC, the allocation sites in the DPD will not have any effect on the habitats on which the great crested newts depend. Therefore, the Fens Pools SAC has been eliminated from this HRA Review process.
2.11. The inclusion in this HRA Review of the Severn Estuary SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites and the Humber Estuary SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites has also been considered. These international sites were included in the HRA of the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy. Consultation with the Environment Agency as well as South Staffordshire Water (SSW) and Severn Trent Water (STW) (the two local water utility companies that provide the water for South Staffordshire) was completed as part of this HRA Review. The Environment Agency has confirmed that no licences within the region that covers South Staffordshire have been found to have likely significant effects on the Severn Estuary SAC, SPA and Ramsar sites or the Humber Estuary SAC, SPA and Ramsar sites (see Appendix A). One change to the licence at Keadby Power Station was required to ensure no significant effects on the Humber Estuary international sites (the licence was changed to include a condition that when the power station next has planned outage (2014) changes would be made to the fish screens on the intake and to the return system to prevent impingement of lamprey, one of SACs qualifying species). As such, there is no need to include the Severn Estuary SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites and the Humber Estuary SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites within this HRA Review.
2.12. Therefore this HRA Review focuses on possible likely significant effects of the DPD on the following international sites: Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC. Further information on the reasons for designation for each of these sites is included in Section 3 below.
Obtaining Information on International Sites with the Potential to be Affected
2.13. The Conservation Objectives and Favourable Conditions Tables for Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC have been obtained from Natural England for the purpose of this assessment
6.
Review of the DPD
2.14. The DPD was reviewed to identify if any of the allocation sites in the Plan are likely to have a significant effect on the international sites.
6 Information taken from Information on Natura 2000 Sites in the West Midlands prepared for Natural England by
Treweek Environmental Consultants (Version 2, dated 14/07/09)
5
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
2.15. The assessment of the DPD and its allocation sites has taken account of Natural England guidance
7.
2.16. Where possible likely significant impacts have been noted, recommendations on how to avoid these impacts have been made. Furthermore, recommendations to strengthen the Publication Document DPD when it is produced, in relation to its consideration of international sites, have also been made.
2.17. The assessment of the DPD for the purpose of this HRA Review is summarised in Table 5.1 (see Section 5 below) which contains the following information:
Allocation Site Reference;
Assessment of whether or not the allocation site will have a likely significant effect on the
international sites and a justification for this finding; and
Recommendations for the final Core Strategy.
2.18. Allocation sites have been assessed as falling into one of three categories:
Red: Allocation site that is extremely likely to lead to likely significant effects on an
international site. The allocation site will therefore require detailed assessment (and
mitigation) as part of the HRA of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document –
Publication Document (including Stage 1 – Screening and Stage 2 – Appropriate
Assessment);
Amber: Allocation site that may lead to likely significant effects on an international site. The
allocation site may require detailed assessment (and mitigation) as part of the HRA of the
Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document (including Stage 1 –
Screening and potentially Stage 2 – Appropriate Assessment);
Green: Allocation site will not lead to likely significant effects on an international site. Stage
1 – Screening of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document
is likely to conclude that there will be no significant effects on the international site from the
allocation.
2.19. The Site Allocations DPD issued to Atkins for the purpose of this HRA Review included the maps showing the locations of the potential allocation sites only. The number of houses or type of employment site to be provided are also not specified. Furthermore, no supporting text has been provided. As such this HRA Review assesses the location of each potential allocation site only.
Information Used to Inform HRA Review
2.20. Documents that have been reviewed for additional information on Cannock Chase SAC and to help inform this HRA Review include:
Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty: Management Plan 2009-14 (Final
Draft, Cannock Chase AONB Unit, 2009);
Cannock Chase AONB Visitor Survey 2000; (Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Beauty
(AONB) Unit);
The West Midlands Regional Planning Body Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Phase
II Revision of the Regional Spatial Strategy for the West Midlands (October 2007);
Evidence Base relating to Cannock Chase SAC and the Appropriate Assessment of Local
Authority Core Strategies (Footprint Ecology, November 2009);
Cannock Chase Visitor Impact Mitigation Strategy (Footprint Ecology, March 2010);
7 The Habitats Regulations Assessment of Local Development Documents – Revised Draft Guidance, David
Tyldesley and Associates for Natural England (February 2009)
6
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Cannock Chase SAC Visitor Observation Study – (Footprint Ecology, June 2012)
Cannock Chase ANOB Visitor Survey – (Footprint Ecology, February 2013);
Cannock Chase ANOB Visitor Survey: Map Annex – (Footprint Ecology, September 2012);
Impacts of Recreation to Cannock Chase SAC (Footprint Ecology, September 2012); and,
Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report (Footprint Ecology, December 2012).
Consultation
2.21. This HRA Review will be sent to Natural England for their comments and approval.
Assessing the Likely Significant Effects of the Plan
2.22. Likely significant effect is defined as any effect that may reasonably be predicted as a consequence of a plan or project that may affect the conservation objectives of the features for which the site was designated, but excluding trivial or inconsequential effects. Likely significant effect is defined within the Habitats Regulations Guidance Note 3
8 (English Nature 1999) and
would include any of the following:
Causing change to the coherence of the site or to the Natura 20009 series (e.g. presenting a
barrier between isolated fragments, or reducing the ability of the site to act as a source of
new colonisers);
Causing reduction in the area of habitat or of the site;
Causing direct or indirect change to the physical quality of the environment (including the
hydrology) or habitat within the site;
Causing ongoing disturbance to species or habitats for which the site is notified;
Altering community structure (species composition);
Causing direct or indirect damage to the size, characteristics or reproductive ability of
populations on the site;
Altering the vulnerability of populations etc to other impacts;
Causing a reduction in the resilience of the feature against external change (for example its
ability to respond to extremes of environmental conditions); and,
Affecting restoration of a feature where this is a conservation objective.
2.23. HRA is an iterative process. Where necessary, suggestions can be made of how to amend the Plan to avoid likely significant effects on an international site. This iterative approach has been adopted as part of this HRA Review: recommendations for the Plan have been provided to South Staffordshire Council as part of this document.
2.24. The precautionary principle (as enshrined in the Habitats Regulations) has been taken into account during this HRA Review. The precautionary principle is used when an HRA cannot objectively demonstrate that there will be no likely significant effects on the international sites. If this occurs the subsequent stages of HRA must be completed for the project or plan.
8 Produced by English Nature in 1999
9 Natura 2000 sites are ‘international sites’ as defined earlier in this report.
7
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
3. The International Sites
3.1. This section includes information about Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC, their designation status, their location in relation to the Plan boundary, a brief description of each international site, their conservation objectives and their sensitivities
10.
Table 3.1: Information about Mottey Meadows SAC
Site Designation
Status
Mottey Meadows SAC
Location of
International Site
Mottey Meadows SAC is located within South Staffordshire.
The closest settlement to the SAC is Wheaton Aston, located approximately
0.8 km east of the international site.
Brief Description of
the European Site
Mottey Meadows is designated for its Annex I habitats: lowland hay
meadows (Alopecurus pratensis, Sanguisorba officinalis). The site holds a
relatively large area of the habitat (approximately 40 ha).
The site contains grassland with limited influence of agricultural
intensification and so demonstrates good conservation of structure and
function. There are transitions to other dry and wet grassland types. The site
is important for a range of rare meadow species, including fritillary Fritillaria
meleagris at its most northerly native locality.
Conservation
Objectives
To maintain the lowland hay meadows in favourable condition, with particular
reference to the MG4 and MG8 NVC communities.
Sensitivities of the
International Site
The site is vulnerable for a number of reasons, including the threat of:
Increase in water levels: Waterlogging from increased flooding levels
has potential to affect the site, particularly if nutrient-rich water is able to
lie on the meadows for any length of time. This may facilitate competition
by more generalist plant species, leading to a loss of species that make
up the designated habitat;
Changes in water quality leading to eutrophication: This may change
the composition and structure of the vegetation on the site and may lead
to the invasion by generalist native and non-native species;
Physical damage: Site-specific management requires grazing and/or
mowing annually. Early grazing may affect Snake’s-head Fritillary
populations, whilst poaching, stock feeding and late flooding also cause
problems;
Changes in air quality leading to eutrophication: As with water
pollution inputs, increases the risk of competitive exclusion by other plant
species, changes vegetation composition and structure; and,
Changes in air quality leading to acidification: The vegetation of this
site is sensitive to increased acidification, which will change the
vegetation composition and structure.
10
Conservation Objectives and Sensitivities have been taken from Information on Natura 2000 Sites in the West
Midlands prepared for Natural England by Treweek Environmental Consultants (Version 2, dated 14/07/09).
8
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Table 3.2: Information about Cannock Chase SAC
Site Designation
Status
Cannock Chase SAC
Location of
International Site
Cannock Chase SAC is located in Staffordshire, to the north of Cannock. It
is located directly adjacent to the north-eastern boundary of South
Staffordshire.
Brief Description of
the International Site
The area of lowland heath that forms Cannock Chase SAC is the most
extensive in the Midlands. The character is intermediate between the upland
or northern heaths of England and Wales and those of southern counties.
The dry heath communities present belong to National Vegetation
Classification types H8 (Calluna vulgaris - Ulex gallii) and H9 (Calluna
vulgaris – Deschampsia flexuosa) heaths (British Plant Communities Volume
2: Mires and Heaths, J.S. Rodwell, 1998). These habitats are the primary
reason for the selection of the site.
Cannock Chase has the main British population of hybrid bilberry (Vaccinium
x intermedium), a plant of restricted occurrence. There are also important
populations of butterflies and beetles, as well as European nightjar and five
species of bats.
Also present are northern Atlantic wet heaths with cross leafed heath (Erica
tetralix). This habitat is a qualifying feature of the SAC but is not the primary
reason for the selection of this site.
Conservation
Objectives
Maintain European dry heaths and North Atlantic wet heaths with Erica
tetralix (cross-leaved heath) in a favourable condition, with particular
reference to the NVC communities present: H8, H9 and M16.
Sensitivities of the
International Site
The site is vulnerable for a number of reasons, including the threat of:
Recreational pressure and disturbance: A variety of activities are
popular on-site, including horse-riding, mountain biking, dog-walking,
orienteering and informal activities – all contribute to erosion and
fragmentation (see below);
Fragmentation: A consequence of site management and of visitor
pressure, affecting plant communities through increased isolation and
access for competitive species;
Burning and/or grazing: Often required to maintain open heathland,
helping prevent invasion by scrub and grasses;
Invasive species: These species affect the extent and distribution of
habitats on site. Individual species, for example gorse and bracken, that
are natural components of the heathland community can have a
damaging effect on the site if allowed to become dominant through lack
of management. Other species such as heather beetle and phytophthora
can affect individual species;
Succession of habitats: Management is required to prevent succession
to woodland, including non-native species such as pine;
Changes in air quality leading to eutrophication: Heathlands are
naturally low nitrogen habitats and therefore inputs of nitrogen tend to be
detrimental in increasing the relative competitive advantage of grasses
and scrub (see also invasive species above);
Changes in air quality leading to acidification: Acidification of
heathland ecosystems, through aerial inputs of nitrogen and sulphur, may
change the species composition of the habitat and lead to premature
death of desired species;
9
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Toxic contamination: Direct contamination of habitats through toxic
pollutants, leading to direct mortality;
Reduction in water levels: Erica tetralix is restricted to wetter or
waterlogged ground. Therefore abstraction that causes drying will affect
distribution and abundance; and,
Changes in water quality leading to eutrophication: The vegetation
of wet heath is particularly sensitive to nutrient nitrogen, whether from
atmospheric or aquatic sources.
Table 3.3: Information about Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Site Designation
Status
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Location of
International Site
The SAC is located near Wyrley Common in Cannock. It is located
approximately 750 m east of the boundary of South Staffordshire.
Brief Description of
the International Site
Cannock Extension Canal SAC is designated for the Annex II species that it
supports: floating water plantain (Luronium natans). Cannock Extension
Canal is an example of anthropogenic, lowland habitat supporting floating
water-plantain at the eastern limit of the plant’s natural distribution in
England.
A very large population of the species occurs in the Canal, which has a
diverse aquatic flora and rich dragonfly fauna, indicative of good water
quality.
The low volume of boat traffic on this terminal branch of the Wyrley and
Essington Canal has allowed open-water plants, including floating water-
plantain, to flourish, while depressing the growth of emergents.
Conservation
Objectives
Maintain habitat for floating water-plantain, with particular reference to open
standing water habitats in which it occurs.
Sensitivities of the
International Site
The site is vulnerable for a number of reasons, including the threat of:
Recreational pressure and disturbance: Floating water plantain
requires relatively undisturbed water. Excessive quantities or higher
speed boat traffic may cause physical damage and destruction;
Change in water quality leading to eutrophication: Polluted runoff is
likely to affect the quality of the water where floating water plantain is
found. This increases biological oxygen demand, reducing the levels of
dissolved oxygen in water and increasing mortality of aquatic flora and
fauna;
Changes in water quality leading to increase sediment load:
Discharge of water carrying a high sediment load can affect water clarity;
Changes in water quality leading to toxic contamination: Road
drains discharge to the site and could carry pollutant in the event of a
spillage from, for example, a road tanker;
New supply affecting water quality: Any changes, for example canal
restoration, that require a new water source could affect the chemical
composition of the water;
Changes in air quality leading to eutrophication and acidification:
Increased levels of nitrogen, and perhaps sulphur will have detrimental
effects on water quality (and an increased effect in combination with
impacts of runoff, see above);
10
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Invasive species: Introductions of species such as American pondweed
may out-compete floating water-plantain; and,
Physical disturbance: Restoration to provide an additional connection
to the canal network could result in a flow through the canal which could
have a damaging effect to the plant communities present.
11
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
4. Plan Details
4.1. The Site Allocations DPD outlines the allocation sites currently being considered by South Staffordshire Council to deliver housing and employment across the area.
4.2. The DPD includes a total of 133 allocation sites in 16 villages across South Staffordshire including:
Bilbrook: Four potential allocation sites - 209, 210, 211, 213 and two potential Employment
allocation sites – E7, E8;
Brewood: Five potential allocation sites – 053, 054, 055, 068, 376
Cheslyn Hay: Eight potential allocation sites – 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 424
Codsall: Ten potential allocation sites – 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 228, 406, 419, 425;
Coven: Seven potential allocation sites – 080, 082, 084, 085, 086, 087, 100;
Essington: Six potential allocation sites – 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 157
Featherstone: A total of ten potential allocation sites – 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 395,
396, 397, 433 and eight potential employment sites – E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E9, E10;
Great Wyrley: Eight potential allocation sites – 134, 136, 137, 138, 139, 141, 145, 440, 441
Huntington: Six potential allocation sites (for safeguarded land) – 012, 013, 014, 015, 016,
017
Kinver: Seven potential allocation sites – 270, 271, 272, 273, 274a, 274b, 409;
Pattingham: Seven potential allocation sites –249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 401, 421;
Penkridge: Seven potential allocation sites – 001, 003, 004, 005, 006, 420, 430;
Perton: Six potential allocation sites – 238a, 239, 241, 246a, 402, 407;
Swindon: Five potential allocation sites – 312a, 313, 314, 315, 437;
Wheaton Aston: Ten potential allocation sites – 089, 090, 091, 092, 094, 93/377, 378, 379,
422, 426;
Wombourne: A total of 16 potential allocation sites – 279, 280, 281a, 281b, 282, 283, 284,
285, 287/288, 289, 300, 302, 415, 416, 417, 438
4.3. The number of houses and/or proposals for employment at each allocation site has not been identified as part of the DPD. However, the development to be provided in each village will adhere to the proposals outlined in the Core Strategy. For example, the number of houses will comply with ‘Core Policy 6 – Housing Delivery’ of the Core Strategy. However, the distribution of the housing numbers across site(s) within each village has not yet been determined and will be formulated through the Options Consultation DPD (e.g. distribution may be centred on one allocation site or spread across several allocation sites).
4.4. Within the Core Strategy the villages are grouped into five localities. Each locality area and the number of houses to be provided in each village (in accordance with the Core Strategy are outlined below. It is important to note that these numbers take account of applications approved between 2010 and 2013 and are subject to Member and community approval before they can be taken to constitute the required allocation for each village:
Locality Area 1 – Northern Area: Penkridge (0 dwellings);
12
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Locality Area 2 – North-Western Area: Brewood (53 dwellings), Coven (40 dwellings) and
Wheaton Aston (21 dwellings);
Localilty Area 3 – North-Eastern Area: Cheslyn Hay (52 dwellings), Great Wyrley (87
dwellings), Essington (0 dwellings) and Featherstone (43 dwellings);
Locality Area 4 – Central Area: Bilbrook (102 dwellings), Codsall (221 dwellings), Perton
(163 dwellings) and Pattingham (3 dwellings); and,
Locality Area 5 – Southern Area: Kinver (86 dwellings), Wombourne (176 dwellings) and
Swindon (23 dwellings).
4.5. The Core Strategy, through Policy GB2 - Land Safeguarded for Longer Term Needs (White Land), states that areas of land will be safeguarded for future development. This includes land within the greenbelt. These areas will not be built upon within the Core Strategy period (e.g. no housing will be constructed on these sites before 2028). The Site Allocations DPD identifies six potential sites for safeguarded land within Huntingdon. No development is currently proposed on these sites (pre 2028).
13
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
5. Findings of the HRA Review
5.1. None of the proposals within the Plan are directly connected with or necessary to the management of Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC or Cannock Extension Canal SAC.
5.2. The findings of the HRA Review are provided in Table 5.1 below. As outlined in Section 2 above, allocation sites have been assessed as falling into one of three categories:
Red: Allocation site that is extremely likely to lead to likely significant effects on an
international site. The allocation site will therefore require detailed assessment (and
mitigation) as part of the HRA of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document –
Publication Document (including Stage 1 – Screening and Stage 2 – Appropriate
Assessment);
Amber: Allocation site that may lead to likely significant effects on an international site. The
allocation site may require detailed assessment (and mitigation) as part of the HRA of the
Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document (including Stage 1 –
Screening and potentially Stage 2 – Appropriate Assessment);
Green: Allocation site will not lead to likely significant effects on an international site. Stage
1 – Screening of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document
is likely to conclude that there will be no significant effects on the international site from the
allocation.
Groundwater Flows
5.3. The Environment Agency (EA) has confirmed that their Review of Consents (RoC) process determined that there were no likely significant effects on Cannock Extension Canal SAC or Mottey Meadows SAC from the abstraction licences held by South Staffordshire Water (SSW) and Severn Trent Water (STW) (see Appendix A).
5.4. Furthermore both the EA and Natural England have confirmed, through the RoC process, that none of the SSW abstraction points are having significant effects on any international sites (including Cannock Chase SAC). SSW has confirmed that there is no deficit in water supplied for the South Staffordshire area over the next 25 years and that there will be no change to current consented abstraction licences and no schemes for new water resources. As such SSW has not been required to progress to the next stage of the RoC process and have had no HRA work completed on their Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP)
11. SSW can therefore
supply water to the increased levels of housing in the areas of South Staffordshire that SSW supply without this operation leading to likely significant effects on the three international sites.
11
Personal communication with Matt Hudson (Water Resource Manager at South Staffordshire Water) on
30/06/2010.
14
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
5.5. STW and the EA have confirmed that the RoC Stage 4 carried out in March 2010 concluded the abstraction licences at Milford and Bednall could adversely impact the qualifying features of Cannock Chase SAC at fully licensed rates (see Appendix A). To ensure no adverse effect on site integrity of this SAC, the Milford licence needs to be reduced by 6 megalitres a day (Ml/d) and the licence at Bednall needs to be varied to reduce the average daily rate of abstraction by 0.5Ml/d to 2.81Ml/d
12. The water abstraction at these points have been reduced accordingly and
the EA will limit the abstraction at both points until STW are able to provide evidence of that abstraction at the fully licensed quantity does not lead to significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC.
5.6. The STW WRMP13
concludes that it has the capacity to supply water to its local authorities over the WRMP period (2010 to 2035) which covers the length of the DPD document. The WRMP has been subject to HRA Stage 1 Screening
14 and this has concluded that there are no likely
significant effects on international sites (including Cannock Chase SAC).
5.7. Given the abstraction limits that have been enforced by the EA at Milford and Bednall, and the conclusion of the HRA of STW WRMP, water can be supplied by STW to the additional housing proposed in South Staffordshire without causing likely significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC.
5.8. Taking into account all of the information provided above, the effects of water abstraction from increased levels of housing in South Staffordshire on Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC can be screened out of this HRA Review.
Summary of Key Findings
Mottey Meadows SAC
5.9. Likely significant effects on Mottey Meadows SAC may only occur from potential allocation sites proposed in one village location: Wheaton Aston. Allocation sites in this location have been assessed as being amber (i.e. allocation site(s) that may lead to likely significant effects on an international site and may require detailed assessment (and mitigation) as part of the HRA of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document).
5.10. No likely significant effects are anticipated from any of the allocation sites proposed in the remaining fifteen of the villages on Mottey Meadows SAC (including Penkridge , Brewood, Coven, Cheslyn Haye, Great Wryley, Essington, Featherstone, Bilbrook, Codsall, Perton, Pattingham, Kinver, Wombourne, Swindon and Huntington).
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
5.11. There are no likely significant effects on Cannock Extension Canal SAC anticipated from any of the allocation sites proposed in any of the sixteen village locations.
Cannock Chase SAC
5.12. Likely significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC may only occur from potential allocation sites proposed in fourteen village locations: Penkridge, Brewood, Coven, Wheaton Aston, Cheslyn Haye, Great Wryley, Essington, Featherstone, Codsall, Bilbrook, Perton, Kinver, Wombourne and Huntington. Allocation sites in these locations have been assessed as being amber (allocation sites may lead to likely significant effects on an international site and may require detailed assessment (and mitigation) as part of the HRA of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document).
5.13. No likely significant effects are anticipated from any of the allocation sites proposed in the remaining two villages on Cannock Chase SAC (including Pattingham and Swindon).
12
The Environment Agency has determined that there would be no likely significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC
from these reduced abstraction rates. Natural England has confirmed they are in agreement with this conclusion (see Appendix B).
13 Water Resources Management Plan – Final Version (June 2010), Severn Trent Water.
14 The findings of this report were summarised in Section 4.4.6 of Severn Trent Waters WRMP.
15
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Table 5.1: Results of the HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
LOCALITY AREA 1 – NORTHERN AREA
Penkridge (0 dwellings)
001 Given the distance of the allocation sites in Penkridge from the Cannock Extension Canal SAC (all
approximately 10.8 km away) it is unlikely that impacts from the development at any of these allocation sites
would extend to this SAC. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality, air quality and
increased recreation.
The allocation sites are all located over 7.7 km away from Mottey Meadows SAC. Given this distance it is not
anticipated that the development at these allocation sites would lead to a deterioration in air quality at this
SAC. Mottey Meadows SAC is not a tourist destination and as such there are no likely significant effects
from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Penkridge. Furthermore, Mottey Meadows
SAC will be protected from a decrease in water quality and to alterations in groundwater flow by policies in
the overarching Core Strategy (Policy EQ7 – Water Quality and Policy EQ1 – Protecting, Enhancing and
Expanding Natural Assets respectively). All development will be expected to comply with the policies and
supporting text within the Core Strategy.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is approximately 5 km west of the allocation sites identified in Penkridge. Cannock
Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in Penkridge
it may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2 – Cannock Chase
Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of suitable alternative
natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a case by case basis)
in order to avoid this occurring. As outlined above all development will be expected to comply with the
policies and supporting text within the Core Strategy.
The Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document should include a cross-reference to Policies EQ1, EQ2 and
EQ7 and re-iterate their key points. This will help to protect all three
international sites.
The Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document must commit to mitigation measures that accord with the
findings of the Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report15
and any other relevant evidence which emerges. In order to comply this
report the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document may need to provide suitable alternative natural greenspace
or any other suitable mitigation measures as part of all allocation sites
within 15 km of the Cannock Chase SAC. The requirement for
developer contributions towards mitigation for new residential
accommodation within all allocation sites within 15 km of the SAC (with
additional measures for large developments of 50+ houses) must also be
stated. These measures may change and therefore, the Site Allocations
Development Plan Document – Publication Document must include the
most up to date mitigation measures. These measures will help to avoid
increased recreational pressure on Cannock Chase SAC and thus avoid
any likely significant effects on this international site.
003
004
005
006
420
430
LOCALITY AREA 2 – NORTH-WESTERN AREA
Brewood (53 dwellings)
053 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Brewood and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 4.9 km, 13.2 km and 11.6 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs (see reasons outlined for allocation sites in Penkridge
above). This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality and air quality. Mottey Meadows SAC and
Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist destinations and as such there are no likely significant
effects from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Brewood.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Brewood it may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2
Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of
suitable alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a
case by case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
As outlined for Penkridge above.
054
055
068
15
Most recent version at the time of writing this report is the Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report (Footprint Ecology, December 2012).
16
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
376
Coven (40 dwellings)
080 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Coven and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 8.4 km, 10.7 km and 10.8 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality
and air quality. Both Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist
destinations and as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of
development in Coven.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Coven may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2 Cannock
Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of suitable
alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a case by
case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
As outlined for Penkridge above.
082
084
085
086
087
100
Wheaton Aston (21 dwellings)
089 Mottey Meadows SAC
Mottey Meadows SAC is located approximately 600 m west of the nearest allocation site (378). Development
in Wheaton Aston, although in close proximity to Mottey Meadows SAC, is unlikely to have a significant effect
on the international site through a deterioration in air quality due to the small number of dwellings proposed to
be constructed. The SAC is further protected from changes in air quality due to two policies in the
overarching Core Strategy16
(Policy EV11 – Sustainable Travel which states that all proposals for
development must include provisions for sustainable transport and Policy EV5 – Rural Employment which
states the carbon emission reductions all developments are expected to achieve). The SAC will also be
protected from a decrease in water quality and to alterations in groundwater flows by two other policies in the
overarching Core Strategy (Policy EQ7- Water Quality and Policy EQ1 – Protecting, Enhancing and
Expanding Natural Assets respectively).
Mottey Meadows SAC is not a tourist destination. The potential allocation sites in Wheaton Aston are
located in close proximity to the SAC. There are public rights of way that link the village to the SAC.
However, these footpaths pass along the edge of the SAC only (no public access is present within the SAC
itself).
Cannock Extension Canal SAC and Cannock Chase SAC
Given the distances between the allocation sites in Wheaton Aston and these two international sites (at their
It is strongly recommended that Allocation Sites 089, 094 and the New
Housing Site (378) Suggestion to the North of 089 are not taken forward
within the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document. These allocation sites will bring development closer to Mottey
Meadows SAC, outside the existing development boundary of Wheaton
Aston.
The Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document should include a cross-reference to Policies EV5, EV11,
EQ1, EQ2 and EQ7 and re-iterate their key points. This will help to
protect all three international sites.
The Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document must commit to mitigation measures that accord with the
findings for the Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report
and any other relevant evidence which emerges. In order to comply with
this report the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication
Document may need to provide suitable alternative natural greenspace or
any other suitable mitigation measures as part of all allocation sites within
15 km of the Cannock Chase SAC. The requirement for developer
090
091
092
094
16
All policies within the Core Strategy must be considered by developers when planning applications are put forward to the Local Planning Authority. All development will be expected to comply with the policies and supporting text within the Core Strategy.
17
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
093 and 377 closest, approximately 17.3 km and 13.3 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality
and air quality. Cannock Extension Canal SAC is not popular tourist destination and as such there are no
likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Wheaton Aston.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Cannock
Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Wheaton Aston may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2 -
Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of
suitable alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a
case by case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
contributions towards mitigation for new residential accommodation within
all allocation sites within 15 km of the SAC (with additional measures for
large developments of 50+ houses) must also be stated. These
measures may change and therefore, the Site Allocations Development
Plan Document – Publication Document must include the most up to date
mitigation measures. These measures will help to avoid increased
recreation on Cannock Chase SAC and thus avoid any likely significant
effects on this international site.
378
379
422
426
439
442
LOCALITY AREA 3 – NORTH-EASTERN AREA
Cheslyn Hay (63 dwellings)
115 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Cheslyn Haye and the three international sites (at their
closest, approximately 14.3 km, 4.3 km and 6.8 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development
at these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality,
and air quality. Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist
destinations and as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of
development in Cheslyn Haye.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Cheslyn Haye may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2
Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of
suitable alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a
case by case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
As outlined for Penkridge above.
116
118
119
120
424
Great Wyrley (87 dwellings)
18
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
134 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Wyrley and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 15.7 km, 2.5 km and 6.3 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at these
allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality, and air
quality. Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist destinations and
as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of development in
Great Wyrley.
The Cannock Extension Canal SAC is relatively close to the potential allocation sites. However,
development in these locations is unlikely to have a significant effect on this SAC through changes to air
quality due to the requirements of two policies in the overarching Core Strategy including Policy EV11 –
Sustainable Transport (which states that all proposals for development must include provisions for
sustainable transport) and Policy EV5 – Rural Employment (which states the carbon emission reductions all
developments are expected to achieve).
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Cheslyn Hay may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2
Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of
suitable alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a
case by case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
As outlined for Penkridge above.
In addition the Site Allocations Development Plan Document –
Publication Document should include a cross-reference to Policies EV5
and EV11 and re-iterate their key points in relation to sustainable
development. This will help to protect all three international sites. 136
137
138
139
141
145
440
441
Essington (0 dwellings)
150 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Essington and the three international sites (at their
closest, approximately 14.8 km, 5.7 km and 10.6 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development
at these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality,
and air quality. Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist
destinations and as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of
development in Essington.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Essington may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2 Cannock
Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of suitable
alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a case by
case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
As outlined for Penkridge above.
151
152
153
154
157
Featherstone (43 dwellings)
19
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
167 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Featherstone and the three international sites (at their
closest, approximately 11.5 km, 7.7 km and 10.7 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development
at these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality,
and air quality. Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist
destinations and as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of
development in Featherstone.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination and should any of these allocations be taken forward in
Featherstone may lead to an increase in the number of people visiting this SAC. However, Policy EQ2
Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation of the overarching Core Strategy states that the provision of
suitable alternative natural greenspace within development proposals may be required (to be assessed on a
case by case basis) in order to avoid this occurring.
As outlined for Penkridge above.
168
169
170
171
172
395
396
397
433
E1 – Employment site suggestion
E2 – Employment site suggestion
E3 – Employment site suggestion
E4 – Employment site suggestion
E5 – Employment site suggestion
E6 – Employment site suggestion
E9 - Employment site suggestion
E10 - Employment site suggestion
20
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
LOCALITY AREA 4 – CENTRAL AREA
Bilbrook (102 dwellings)
209 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Bilbrook and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 10.9 km, 12.6 km and 15 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at these
allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality, and air
quality. Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist destinations and
as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of development in
BIlbrook.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
All allocation sites lie on the edge of the 15 km zone of influence for Cannock Chase SAC identified by the
Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report. This SAC is a popular tourist destination. This
document states that additional large developments (of 50+ houses) may need to supply additional mitigation
measures to protect the Cannock Chase SAC from the effects of increased recreational pressure. As a total
of 105 dwellings are to be provided within Bilbrook, and the potential distribution of these houses is currently
unknown, it is possible that development at this location may lead to significant effects on Cannock Chase
SAC through recreational pressure.
The HRA Screening of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document
– Publication Document must consider the allocation sites in this location
to determine if significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC are likely.
In addition, it may be necessary for the Site Allocations Development
Plan Document – Publication Document to commit to mitigation measures
that accord with the findings for the Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase
SAC Mitigation Report and any other relevant evidence which emerges.
This may include the provision of suitable alternative natural green space
and developer contributions. The required measures may change with
new evidence coming to light and therefore, the Site Allocations
Development Plan Document – Publication Document must include the
most up to date mitigation measures. These measures will help to avoid
increased recreation on Cannock Chase SAC and thus avoid any likely
significant effects on this international site.
210
211
213
E7 - Employment site suggestion
E8 – Employment site suggestion
Codsall (221 dwellings)
220 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Codsall and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 8.6 km, 14 km and 15.6 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at these
allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality, and air
quality.
Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC are not popular tourist destinations and as such
there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Codsall.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
All allocation sites lie on the edge of the 15 km zone of influence for Cannock Chase SAC identified by the
Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report. This SAC is a popular tourist destination. This
document states that additional large developments (of 50+ houses) may need to supply additional mitigation
measures to protect the Cannock Chase SAC from the effects of increased recreational pressure. As a total
of 222 dwellings are to be provided within Codsall, and the potential distribution of these houses is currently
unknown, it is possible that development at this location may lead to significant effects on Cannock Chase
SAC through recreational pressure.
As outlined for Bilbrook above.
221
222
223
224
225
228
406
419
425
Perton (163 dwellings)
21
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
238a Given the distances between the allocation sites in Swindon and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 11.9 km, 16.6 km and 18.8 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality,
air quality and from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Swindon.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC and Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Although all allocation sites lie outside of the 15 km zone of influence identified by the Footprint Ecology
Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report this document states that additional large developments (of 50+
houses) may need to supply additional mitigation measures to protect the Cannock Chase SAC from the
effects of increased recreational pressure. As a total of 166 dwellings are to be provided within Perton, and
the potential distribution of these houses is currently unknown, it is possible that development at this location
may lead to significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC through recreational pressure.
As outlined for Bilbrook above.
239
241
246a
402
407
Pattingham (3 dwellings)
249 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Swindon and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 12.9 km, 20 km and 22.2 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at these
allocation sites would extend to the SACs, especially as such a small number of houses are proposed at this
location. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality, air quality and from increased recreation
levels as a result of development in Swindon.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase Extension Canal or Cannock Chase SAC.
None required.
250
251
252
253
401
421
LOCALITY AREA 5 – SOUTHERN AREA
Kinver (86 dwellings)
270 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Swindon and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 28.2 km, 32.2 km and 27.6 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality,
air quality and from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Swindon.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC and Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Although all allocation sites lie outside of the 15 km zone of influence identified by the Footprint Ecology
Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report, this document states that additional large developments (of 50+
houses) may need to supply additional mitigation measures to protect the Cannock Chase SAC from the
As outlined for Bilbrook above.
271
272
273
22
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
274a effects of increased recreational pressure. As a total of 91 dwellings are to be provided within Kinver, and
the potential distribution of these houses is currently unknown, it is possible that development at this location
may lead to significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC through recreational pressure.
274b
409
Wombourne (176 dwellings)
279 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Swindon and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 20.2 km, 18.7 km and 24.1 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality,
air quality and from increased recreation levels as a result of development in Swindon.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC and Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Although all allocation sites lie outside of the 15 km zone of influence identified by the Footprint Ecology
Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report this document states that additional large developments (of 50+
houses) may need to supply additional mitigation measures to protect the Cannock Chase SAC from the
effects of increased recreational pressure. As a total of 256 dwellings are to be provided within Wombourne,
and the potential distribution of these houses is currently unknown, it is possible that development at this
location may lead to significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC through recreational pressure.
As outlined for Bilbrook above.
280
281a
281b
282
283
284
285
287/288
289
300
302
415
416
417
438
23
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Allocation Site Reference
Likely Significant Effects on International Sites?
Justification of Finding Recommendations Mottey
Meadows SAC
Cannock Extension Canal SAC
Cannock Chase SAC
Swindon (23 dwellings)
312a Given the distances between the allocation sites in Swindon and the three international sites (at their closest,
approximately 21.6 km, 21.1 km and 26.8 km respectively) it is unlikely that impacts from development at
these allocation sites would extend to the SACs, especially as such as small number of houses are proposed
at this location. This includes effects on groundwater flows, water quality, air quality and from increased
recreation levels as a result of development in Swindon.
Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on Mottey
Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase Extension Canal or Cannock Chase SAC.
None required.
313
314
315
437
SAFEGUARDED LAND
Huntington (0 dwellings)
012 Given the distances between the allocation sites in Huntington and the Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock
Extension Canal SAC (at their closest, approximately 13.5 km and 6.9 km respectively) it is unlikely that
impacts from development at these allocation sites would extend to the SACs. This includes effects on
groundwater flows, water quality, and air quality. Neither of these SACs are not popular tourist destinations
and as such there are no likely significant effects from increased recreation levels as a result of development
in Huntington. Therefore there are no likely significant effects predicted from the potential allocation sites on
Mottey Meadows SAC or Cannock Chase Extension Canal.
Cannock Chase SAC is a popular tourist destination. A total of five allocation sites (for the purpose of
safeguarded land) are located on the eastern edge of Huntington, approximately 1.2 km west of the SAC
(Allocation Sites 012, 013, 014, 015, and 017). Should the land be safeguarded there is the potential for
future development to bring the development limit of this village closer to the Cannock Chase SAC. The
number and distribution of housing on any of the allocation sites identified for this location could lead to an
increase in the number of people visiting the SAC and, also given the close proximity of the allocation sites to
the SAC, a deterioration in air quality (through development related traffic and the waste management site
suggestion).
It is strongly recommended that Allocation Sites located on the eastern
side of Huntington are not taken forward within the Site Allocations
Development Plan Document – Publication Document. This includes
following allocation sites: 012, 013, 014, 015, and 017. These allocation
sites will bring the development limit of Huntington closer to Cannock
Chase SAC.
The HRA Screening of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document
– Publication Document must consider the allocation sites in this location
to determine if significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC are likely. This
may include the need for detailed air quality impact assessments. The
Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document
must commit to mitigation measures that accord with the findings for the
Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report and any other
relevant evidence which emerges. In order to comply with this report the
Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document
may need to provide suitable alternative natural greenspace or other
suitable mitigation measures as part of all allocation sites within 15 km of
the Cannock Chase SAC. The requirement for developer contributions
towards mitigation for new residential accommodation within all allocation
sites within 15 km of the SAC (with additional measures for large
developments of 50+ houses) must also be stated. These measures may
change and therefore, the Site Allocations Development Plan Document
– Publication Document must include the most up to date mitigation
measures. These measures will help to avoid increased recreation on
Cannock Chase SAC and thus avoid any likely significant effects on this
international site.
013
014
015
016
017
24
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
6. Recommendations
6.1. It is recommended that the following measures are taken forward in the publication draft of the DPD. These measures will help to avoid and/or reduce the likelihood of any likely significant effects on Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Extension Canal SAC and Cannock Chase SAC.
Recommendation 1: Commitment to HRA
6.2. It is recommended that the Council make a commitment to completing the necessary stages of the HRA process of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document.
6.3. The supporting text of the Consultation Draft of the DPD should include words based on the following text:
“Under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) the relevant stages of the Habitats Regulations Assessment process will be completed of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document. This will include the completion of a Stage 1 – Screening report to determine if the allocation sites could have likely significant effects alone or in combination with other projects and plans on European sites and sites of international importance for nature conservation. If necessary, Stage 2 - Appropriate Assessment will also be completed.”
6.4. This will demonstrate to Natural England that the necessary stages of the HRA process will be completed on the document as it is developed.
6.5. Furthermore, the HRA process completed on the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document must pay particular attention to the allocation sites in the following locations to determine if significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC are likely: Penkridge, Brewood, Coven, Wheaton Aston, Cheslyn Hay, Great Wryley, Essington, Featherstone, Codsall, Bilbrook, Perton, Kinver, Wombourne and Huntington. This may include the need for detailed air quality impact assessments.
6.6. The HRA process must also pay particular attention to the allocation sites in the following location to determine if significant effects on Mottey Meadows SAC are likely: Wheaton Aston.
Recommendation 2: HRA Text to Be Included In the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document
6.7. Text relating to the HRA process should be included within the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document.
6.8. This should include a form of words similar to those below. The exact wording should be finalised once the HRA process has been completed:
A Habitats Regulations Assessment has been undertaken of this DPD as required by Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) in order to see whether its proposals could have the potential to result in likely significant effects upon European sites and sites of international importance for nature conservation that include:
Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) designated under European Council Directive 92/43/EEC(a) on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild
25
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Fauna and Flora (the Habitats Directive) and candidate SACs;
Special Protection Areas (SPA) designated under the European Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the Conservation of Wild Birds (the Birds Directive);
Proposed and listed Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar sites), possible SACs (pSACs) and potential SPAs (pSPAs) for which the UK Government has as a matter of policy chosen to apply the Habitats Regulations Assessment procedures even though these are not European sites as a matter of law (National Planning Policy Framework, para 118).
There is one European site within South Staffordshire: Mottey Meadows SAC near Wheaton Aston. There are also two European sites in close proximity to the South Staffordshire Council boundary: Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC. The first stage of the Habitats Regulations Assessment process (HRA) Stage 1 Screening of the Core Strategy has found that there are no likely significant effects on these three European sites
17. Further information on the HRA process and how it will
be taken forward for future projects and plans arising from this DPD is explained in the HRA Assessment.(a copy of the which can be found on the Council’s website at www.sstaffs.gov.uk)
Recommendation 3: Cross Reference to Policies within the South Staffordshire Core Strategy
6.9. It is recommended that the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document includes cross-references to policies within the Core Strategy
18 that are of particular
importance to the allocation site proposals and. how the international sites will be protected from development. This includes the following policies:
Policy EQ1 – Protecting, Enhancing and Expanding Natural Assets;
Policy EQ2 – Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation;
Policy EQ7 – Water Quality;
Policy EV5 – Rural Employment;
Policy EV11 – Sustainable Travel.
6.10. It is recommended that the salient points of these policies (i.e. the measures they require in order to protect international sites) are also included in the supporting text of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document.
Recommendation 4: Inclusion of Relevant Mitigation Measures from Footprint Ecology Reports
6.11. It is strongly recommended that the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document commits to the mitigation measures outlined in the most up to date version of the Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase SAC Mitigation Report
19.
6.12. In order to comply with the Footprint Ecology report the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document may need to commit to suitable alternative natural greenspace being provided alongside any other appropriate mitigation measures as part of all allocation sites within 15 km of the Cannock Chase SAC. The Plan should also commit to a requirement for developer contributions towards mitigation for new residential accommodation within all allocation sites within 15 km of the SAC (with additional measures for large developments of 50+ houses).
17
This sentence must be based on the conclusions of the HRA Stage 1 – Screening assessment once it is completed. 18
South Staffordshire Local Development Framework – Core Strategy Development Plan Document (Version 4,
February 2012) 19
26
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
6.13. It should be noted that these measures may change as any other relevant evidence emerges and, therefore, the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document must include the most up to date mitigation measures available at the time of the HRA of the DPD.
Recommendation 5: Exclusion of Certain Allocation Sites from the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document
6.14. It is strongly recommended that the following allocation sites are not taken forward into the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document to avoid likely significant effects on Mottey Meadows SAC:
089 – Wheaton Aston;
094 – Wheaton Aston;
378 – Wheaton Aston.
6.15. It is also strongly recommended that the following allocation sites are not taken forward into the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document to avoid likely significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC:
012 – Huntington;
013 – Huntington;
014 – Huntington;
015 – Huntington; and,
017 – Huntington.
27
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
7. Conclusions
7.1 Atkins Limited (Atkins) has been commissioned by South Staffordshire Council to undertake a Habitats Regulations Assessment Review of the South Staffordshire Site Allocations Document – Issues and Options Consultation (March 2014).
7.2 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) is required by Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) (the Habitat Regulations) for all plans and projects which may have likely significant effects on international sites. This report completes a review of each of the potential allocation sites outlined within the Site Allocations DPD, undertaken as part of the initial stages of HRA Stage 1 screening process. There are a total of 133 potential allocation sites in 16 village locations across South Staffordshire. The purpose of this HRA Review is to highlight whether any of the potential allocation sites are likely to lead to significant effects on the international sites within and in proximity to South Staffordshire.
7.3 There is one international site within South Staffordshire (Mottey Meadows SAC) and an additional six international sites within 20 km. A total of eleven international sites were eliminated from the HRA Review including Fens Pools SAC, Midlands Meres and Mosses Ramsar site (Phase 2 site), Pasturefields Saltmarsh SAC, West Midland Mosses SAC, Severn Estuary SPA/SAC/Ramsar site and Humber Estuary SPA/SAC/Ramsar site. These international sites have been eliminated from the HRA process because the international sites are not considered to be vulnerable to effects arising from policies within the Site Allocations DPD.
7.4 The international sites considered in this HRA Review are Mottey Meadows SAC, Cannock Chase SAC and Cannock Extension Canal SAC. None of the proposals within the Plan are directly connected with or necessary to the management of these three international sites.
7.5 It is considered that potential allocation sites in one village location (Wheaton Aston) could lead to likely significant effects on Mottey Meadows SAC and that the potential allocation sites in fourteen village locations (Penkridge, Brewood, Coven, Wheaton Aston, Cheslyn Haye, Great Wryley, Essington, Featherstone, Codsall, Bilbrook, Perton, Kinver, Wombourne and Huntington) could lead to likely significant effects on Cannock Chase SAC. The allocation sites in the aforementioned locations have been assessed as potentially requiring detailed assessment (and mitigation) as part of the HRA of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document (including Stage 1 – Screening and potentially Stage 2 – Appropriate Assessment).
7.6 The HRA Review confirmed that there are no likely significant effects on Cannock Extension Canal SAC anticipated from any of the allocation sites proposed in any of the sixteen village locations.
7.7 A number of recommendations have been put forward to help avoid and/or reduce the likelihood of any likely significant effects on Mottey Meadows SAC and Cannock Chase SAC when the Site Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document is produced. These recommendations include:
A commitment to completing the necessary stages of the HRA process on the Site
Allocations Development Plan Document – Publication Document when it is produced
(including Stage 1 – Screening as a minimum);
The inclusion of text relating to HRA and the HRA process within the Site Allocations
Development Plan Document – Publication Document;
Providing cross-references and key salient points to pertinent policies within the overarching
South Staffordshire Core Strategy Development Plan Document including policies EQ1,
EQ2, EQ7, EV5 and EV11;
28
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Inclusion of relevant mitigation measures to protect Cannock Chase SAC from the most up
to date evidence available at the time of the production of the Site Allocations Development
Plan Document – Publication Document, including the Footprint Ecology Cannock Chase
SAC Mitigation Report (December 2012)
Exclusion of certain potential allocation sites from the Site Allocations Development Plan
Document – Publication Document in Wheaton Aston and Huntington.
29
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Appendices
30
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
A. Appendix A
Response from Environment Agency in relation to Humber Estuary and Severn Estuary International Sites
31
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
B. Appendix B
Environment Agency Confirmation of No Likely Significant Effects on Cannock Chase SAC from Reduced Abstraction Rates at Milford and Bednall
32
South Staffordshire Site Allocations DPD – Options Consultation: HRA Review
Atkins The Axis 10 Holliday Street Birmingham B1 1TF Email: [email protected]
© Atkins Ltd except where stated otherwise. The Atkins logo, ‘Carbon Critical Design’ and the strapline ‘Plan Design Enable’ are trademarks of Atkins Ltd.