source localization mfd 2010, 17 th feb 2010 diana omigie and stjepana kovac

24
Source localization MfD 2010, 17 th Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Upload: merlin

Post on 05-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Source localization MfD 2010, 17 th Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Source localizationMfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010

Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Page 2: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Source localization:

I Aim / Application

II Theory

a) What is recorded (EEG / MEG)

b) Forward problem Forward solutions

c) Inverse problem Inverse solutions

d) Inverse solutions: discrete vs. distributed

III The buttons in SPM

Page 3: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

I Aim

To find a focus of brain activity by analysing the electrical

activity recorded from surface electrodes (EEG) or SQUID

(Superconductive Quantum Interference Device; MEG)

Page 4: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

I Application:

- focal epilepsy:

spikes

seizures

- evoked potentials:

auditory evoked potentials

somatosensory evoked potentials

cognitive event related potentials

-

Page 5: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

IIa What is recorded

Lopez daSilva, 2004

EPSP

-

Layer IV

radial

tangential

Page 6: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

IIb Forward problem Forward solutionHow to model the surfaces i.e. the area between

recording electrode and cortical generator?

Plummer, 2008Realistic shape – (BEM isotropic, FEM anisotropic)

Skin, CSF, skull, brain

Page 7: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

IIc Inverse problem Inverse solutions

+-

+ -

Discrete:

- Equivalent current dipole

Distributed (differ in side constraint):

- Minimum norm

(Halmalainen & Ilmoniemi 1984)

-LORETA (Pascual-Marqui, 1994)

-MSP – multiple sparse priors (Friston, 2008)

...........

Page 8: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

IIc Inverse problem Inverse solutionsDiscrete source analysis Distributed source analysis

Current dipole represents an extended brain area

Each current dipole represents one small brain segment

Number of sources < number of sensors Number of sources >> number of sensors

The leadfieldmatrix has more rows (number of sensors) than colums (number of sources)

The leadfieldmatrix has more colums than rows

Result:Source model and source waveforms

Result: 3D Volume imagefor each timepoint

Page 9: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Two aspects of source analysis are original in SPM:

- Based on Bayesian formalism: generic inversion it can

incorporate and estimate the relevance of multiple

constraints (data driven relevance estimation – Baysian

model comparison)

- The subjects specific anatomy incorporated in the

generative model of the data

SPM source analysis

Page 10: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

III The buttons in SPM :Graphical user interface for 3D source localisation

Page 11: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

III EEG/MEG imaging pipeline

0) Load the file

1) Source space modeling

2) Data co-registration

3) Forward computation

4) Inverse reconstruction

5) Summarizing the results of the inverse reconstruction as an

image

Page 12: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

0) Load the file

Page 13: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

1) Source space modeling

MRI

template

MRI – individual

head meshes (boundaries of different

head compartments)

based on the

subject’s

structural scan

Template –

SPM’s template

head model

based on the

MNI brain

Page 14: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

1) Source space modeling

Select mesh size:

- coarse

- normal

- fine

Page 15: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

2) Data co-registration

Co-register

Fiducials –

landmark based

coregistration

Surface matching

Page 16: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

2) Data co-registration

Methods to co-register

– “select” from default locations

– “type” MNI coordinates directory

– “click” manually each fiducial

point from MRI images

Page 17: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

3) Forward computation

Forward Model

Recommendation:

Single shell for MEG

BEM for EEG

Page 18: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

3) Forward computation

Page 19: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

4) Inverse reconstruction

Invert

Imaging

VB-ECD

Beamforming

Page 20: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

4) Inverse reconstruction

Default – click “Standard”:

• “MSP” method will be used. MSP : Multiple Sparse Priors (Friston

et al. 2008a)

Alternatives:

• GS (greedy search: default):

– iteratively add constraints (priors)

• ARD (automatic relevance determination):

– iteratively remove irrelevant constraints

• COH (coherence):

– LORETA-like smooth prior …

Page 21: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

4) Inverse reconstruction

TIME Time course of the region with maximal activity

SPACEMaximal intensity projection (MIP)

Page 22: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

5) Summarizing the results of inverse reconstruction as an image

Window

? Timewindow of

interest (ms peri-

stimulus time)

? Frequency band of

interest (default 0)

? Evoked/ induced

inversion applied

either to each trial

(induced) and then

averaged or

inversion applied to

the averaged trials

(evoked)

Page 23: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

5) Summarizing the results of inverse reconstruction as an image

3D NIfTI images allow GLM

based statistical analysis

(Random field theory)

Page 24: Source localization MfD  2010,  17 th  Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Sources

- indicated under figures

- Stavroula Kousta / Martin Chadwick (2007, MfD)

- Maro Machizawa / Himn Sabir (2008, MfD)

- SPM 8 manual

- BESA tutorials (http://www.besa.de), M. Scherg