PRESENTED BY:-

TARACHAND FULMALI (ROLL NO-T4704)

VIVEK KARANJAWKAR (ROLL NO-T4723)

BADAL PANCHAL (ROLL NO-T4726)

CLASS :- FINAL YEAR B.TECH

YEAR :-2014-2015

GUIDED BY:

MR. MUJAHID. ANSARI

Assistant Professor

M.I.T. (T), Aurangabad

PROJECT AIM

Our main aim to study Acoustic and Mechanical properties

of PVC Pipe.

Targeted Remedies

By using high density filler (using Barium Sulphate).

By reducing coefficient of friction between inside wall of

pipe and flowing water.

INGREDIENTFormulation

1

Formulation

2

Formulation

3

Formulation

4

In phr In phr In phr In phr

PVC 100 100 100 100

TBLS 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Lead Stearate - - - -

Calcium Stearate 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45

Calcium carbonate 12 - - 8

Barium sulfate - 4 8 8

wax 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Stearic acid 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

TYPICAL FORMULATIONS FOR PVC PIPE

PROPERTIES CALCIUM CARBONATE BARIUM SULPHATE

Molecular formula CaCO3 BaSO4

Odour Odourless Odourless

Appearance Fine white powder white crystalline

Density 2.83 g/cc 4.5 g/cc

Melting point 825 °C 1345 °C

PROPERTIES OF FILLERS

Formulation preparation

Material procured

Weighing the

material

MixingPipe

extrusion

TestingResult

analysis

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

Pipe Extrusion

Machine description

FORMULATIONS ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 3 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 PRESSURE

1 170 °C 225 °C 200 °C 205°C 180 °C 55mmHg

2 170 °C 220 °C 220 °C 215 °C 180 °C 70mmHg

3 200 °C 220 °C 210 °C 210 °C 190 °C 60mmHg

4 190 °C 210 °C 205 °C 205 °C 190 °C 90mmHg

PROCESS PARAMETER

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

FORMULATION 1 FORMULATION 2 FORMULATION 3 FORMULATION 4

ASH CONTENT

Ash Content: (ASTM D 2584, D 5630)

TESTING

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

FORMULATION 1 FORMULATION 2 FORMULATION 3 FORMULATION 4

COMPRESSION STRENGTH (Kg/Sq.cm)

Compression Test (ASTM D 695)

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

FORMULATION 1 FORMULATION 2 FORMULATION 3 FORMULATION 4

HARDNESS

Hardness Test (ASTM D 2240)

SOUND TESTING INSTRUMENT

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

FORMULATION 1 FORMULATION 2 FORMULATION 3 FORMULATION 4

SOUND TESTING (IN dB)

Sound Testing

Material RATE

Formulation 1 Formulation 2 Formulation 3 Formulation 4

QtyTotal

amountQty

Total

amountQty

Total

amountQty

Total

amount

PVC 75 25 1875 25 1875 25 1875 25 1875

TBLS 158 0.25 39.5 0.25 39.5 0.25 39.5 0.25 39.5

Lead Stearate 117 0.13 16.02 0.13 16.02 0.13 16.02 0.13 16.02

Calcium Stearate 90 0.112 10.120.11

210.12 0.112 10.12 0.112 10.12

Calcium

carbonate7 3 21 - - - - 2 14

Barium sulphate 247 - - 1 247 2 494 2 494

Wax 120 0.2 24 0.2 24 0.2 24 0.2 24

Stearic acid 77 0.3 23.1 0.3 23.1 0.3 23.1 0.3 23.1

Total amount for

1 batch2008.74 2234.74 2481.74 2495.74

Amount/ foot 40.174 44.69 49.63 49.91

COST ANALYSIS

CONCLUSION

After complete evaluation and analysis, we conclude that formulation 3 is

providing optimum output for our target i.e minimum sound generation and

mechanical properties on higher side.

It was overall an effective and informative experience for us to work on this

project in industry. Starting from raw material dealing to practical working

on machines were noteworthy. This project supported our technical and

theoretical knowledge during practical approach.