sotr final web

Upload: lydia-depillis

Post on 05-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    1/8

    STATE OF THEANACOSTIA RIVER

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    2/8

    WELCOMETO OUR SECOND ANNUAL STATE OF THE RIVERREPORT FOR THE ANACOSTIA RIVER!

    is report card is your guide to how well our communities,environmental groups, and governments are meeting the goal o a

    shable and swimmable nacostia River, per the terms o the lean

    ater ct. ur objective is to provide a benchmark o progress and

    create accountability or decision makers entrusted with the health othe river. e have analyzed scientic data gathered or core river health

    parameters and provided a summary so that citizens and public ocials

    can better understand the progress (or lack thereo) toward a healthy

    nacostia River.

    adly today people who know the nacostia are primarily amiliar with it as the orgotten river,

    subject to decades o pollution and neglect. Few people know the proud history o the nacostia

    River, when it was a major shipping destination. n colonial times Bladensburg was a bigger port thanBaltimore and the river was 40 eet deep to the banks. Freedmen could earn an honest living working

    the rivers wharves. Fish were so bountiul they could be scooped up rom boats, and the marshes othe river were amous or their waterowl hunting.

    e river can again be a thriving community asset. isit its banks yoursel to see the surprising beauty

    and abundance o wildlie. ake your voice heard in eorts to restore this once proud river to its

    proper place in the lie o our communities.

    Jim FosterPresident, nacostia atershed ociety

    Anacostia Watershed Society has a mission to

    protect and restore the Anacostia River andits watershed communities by cleaning the

    water, recovering the shores, and honoring theheritage. We believe that by working together

    with businesses, governments, faith-basedorganizations, and youth we can create sustainable

    solutions that improve our communities, empower

    our residents, and create economic prosperity thatwill result in a clean river. We want to change theway people think about the Anacostia and make

    the river a destination through our new campaignto Rediscover Your Anacostia!

    www.anacostiaws.org

    Data set: All available, professionally collected data was used. The data

    sets include those collected by DC government, Maryland Department

    of Natural Resources, and the Anacostia Watershed Society.

    The data was compared with thresholds developed by Mid-Atlantic

    Tributary Assessment Coalition (MTAC).

    For the 2011 State of the Anacostia River Report, 2010 data set was used

    because it was the most recent available data.

    For trend analysis, data sets from 1984 to 2010 were used depending on

    the parameter and the section of the river.

    DISCLAIMERS

    Design by Communication Visual, www.com-vis.com / Cover photos by Krista Schlyer, www.enviro-pic.org

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    3/8

    PENNAVE

    EAST CAPITOL ST

    NEW YORK AVE

    BLADENSBURG RD

    11THSTREET

    BENNING RD

    STATE OF

    THE 2011

    THE ANACOSTIA RIVER

    SOUTHCAPITOLSTREET

    BA C D F

    PASS FAIL

    POTOMACRIV

    ER

    MARYLAND

    DC

    MARYLANDANACOSTIAB FAIL

    UPPER DCANACOSTIA

    C FAIL

    LOWER DCANACOSTIA

    C FAIL

    Northwest Branch

    Northeast Branch

    THERE ARE FOUR main obstacles to a shable and swimmablenacostia ecal bacteria, toxics, trash, and stormwater. eseissues must be addressed or us to have a healthy river.

    e analyzed water quality data o the tidal nacostia Riverto assess the river in three sections: the aryland portion

    o the nacostia (MD nacostia), the upper portion o thenacostia in DC (Upper DC nacostia), and the lower portiono the nacostia in DC (ower DC nacostia). e parametersused or assessment were issolved xygen, Fecal Bacteria,

    ater larity, hlorophyll (a), and ubmerged quaticegetation (SAV).

    On a pass/fail scale, assessingparameters against Ecologicalresholds developed by MTAC, allsegments received failing grades.

    For the rst time AWS is also using thehesapeake Baywide coheck system toscore parameters. e nacostia received

    an overall and ater larity scored

    a , showing a clear downward trendeven as other parameters show modest

    improvements.

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    4/8

    WATER QUALITY REPORT CARD

    DISSOLVED

    OXYGEN (DO)

    Measureofdissolvedoxygeninthewater

    Criticaltothesurvivalofaquaticlife

    FECAL

    BACTERIA

    InDC,CombinedSewerOverowsdumpraw

    sewagedirectlyintotheAnacostiaRiverany

    timerainexceedsthedrainscapacity

    MDhastwoproblems:leakingsewerpipes

    andanimalwaste

    WATER CLARITY

    (SECCHI DISK DEPTH)

    Measureofhowmuchlight

    penetratesthewatercolumn

    Aectsthehealthofaquaticgrasses

    CHLOROPHYLL (a)

    Measureofmicroalgaebiomass

    Canimpactwaterclarityand

    dissolvedoxygenlevels

    SUBMERGED AQUATIC

    VEGETATION (SAV)

    Habitatformanyaquatic

    organisms.

    Takeupnutrients,increasewater

    clarity,etc. Theamountoflightreachingthe

    bottomdirectlydeterminesifSAV

    cansurvive.

    Parameters * Section grade

    MARYLAND ANACOSTIA

    ENTIRE

    ANACOSTIA:

    % Score0

    Grade

    F

    Trend

    Degraded

    Estimated years

    to meet criterion

    n/a

    % Score 92 54 31 75

    63

    B-

    Grade for each parameter A C D B+

    Trend Improving ImprovingDegradingin

    recentyearsImproving

    Estimated years to meet

    criterion8 87 n/a 43

    UPPER DC ANACOSTIA

    % Score 61 33 26 60

    45

    C

    Grade for each parameter B- D D B-

    Trend Improving ImprovingDegradingin

    recentyears

    Seems

    improving

    Estimated years to meet

    criterion28 39 n/a Insucientdata

    LOWER DC ANACOSTIA

    % Score 56 55 39 59

    52

    C

    Grade for each parameter C+ C+ D+ C+

    Trend Improving ImprovingDegradingin

    recentyearsImproving

    Estimated years to meet

    criterion54 25 n/a 59

    This assessment is based on 2010 water quality data.

    The higher % score indicates better water quality.*Assessment o SAV is available only or the entire Anacostia River.Overall Grade: C-

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    5/8

    IS THE MD ANACOSTIA REALLY CLEANER?e two large ree-fowing tributaries (the

    Northwest and the Northeast Branches)

    upstream o the MD nacostia sectionprovide DO-rich water as they bubble down

    to Bladensburg. Further, although this wateralso contains excess nutrients, actors such

    as better tree canopy in tributaries, and lowerwater temperature do not allow algae to grow

    excessively as compared to the tidal portion

    o the river. is trend is also refected in

    the better hlorophyll (a) score compared todownstream sections.

    is year Fecal Bacteria in the MD nacostia was

    better than usual. n past years it has been theworst o all sections and it is unknown at this

    point i this change is a result oWSSCs ongoingeorts or o variation in the weather pattern.

    e table shown here explains that the most

    upstream section had been on average the

    most polluted with ecal bacteria. n general

    all sections seem to be improving and the MDnacostia may be improving the most quickly.

    WSSC is certainly working hard to x brokenpipes and other sewage discharges.

    ater larity is declining in all sections in recent

    years, primarily due to uncontrolled stormwater

    runo. s a result SAV has entirely disappearedrom the nacostia River since 2003. loudy

    water does not allow sunlight to reach the river

    bottom so that SAV can grow. e volume andvelocity o stormwater runo rom roads, parking

    lots, and roos scours and erodes our streambedsand banks, reeing and transporting excessive

    amounts o sediment that cloud the water and llin downstream channels.

    hile the river is improving gradually overall,

    it is still in a critical condition. n summer 2011,AWS and governments alike were mystied bywhat turned out to be a black-colored algal bloomon the river, caused by a type o algae known as

    a dinofagellate. nother dinofagellate called

    esteria has at times ravaged the aryland

    coast with sh kills this time we were luckybecause the algae was not toxic.

    While the riveris improvinggradually overall,it is still incritical condition.

    Black algal bloom in the Anacostia

    Averages of % Score over 5-year

    periods for fecal bacteria

    5-year avg.

    20012005

    5-year avg.

    20062010

    MD

    AnacostiaD

    29.9 C

    50.5

    Upper DC

    AnacostiaC-

    40.9 C

    50.7

    Lower DC

    AnacostiaC

    52.8 B

    67.4

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    6/8

    POLITICAL REPORT CARD

    Stormwater Toxics Trash Overall Plan

    DCNew MS4 Some progress but

    work remains

    Bag bill,

    trash traps

    MCPiloting neighbor-

    hood-scale retrofts

    Unknown Bag bill, but

    little else

    Good restoration

    work

    PGC New SW regs,MS4 permit delay

    Unknown No movement on

    Trash TMDL

    No overall plan

    MD weak model MS4 Toxic sourcesnot well

    documented

    Trash diet

    pending

    Will WIP be

    adequate?

    FED SW not adequatelyaddressed by

    Bay TMDL

    Some progress but

    work remains

    Trash diet results

    pending

    Urban Waters pilot

    program + new

    restoration und

    DC Washington, DC

    MC Montgomery County, MD

    PGC Prince George's County, MD

    MD State of Maryland

    FED Federal Government

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    7/8

    TO CREATE THE POLITICAL REPORT CARDwe assessed each level o government rom local

    (ashington, DC; ontgomery ounty, MD;rince Georges ounty, MD) to state (aryland)

    to ederal (primarily EPA and other agencies'activity) to give an overall sense o how each isdoing with respect to certain nacostia Riverrestoration activities. o make the most eective

    comparisons, we evaluated clean-up activities or

    three major pollutants (stormwater, toxics, and

    trash) as well as the jusridictions overall plan orrestoring the nacostia River. (Bacteria was not

    assessed because implementation o our consent

    decrees with WSSC and DC ater will address the

    major sources o pollution.)

    e istrict o olumbia has the best overall

    grade, based on a strong new 4 permit that

    will curb stormwater pollution, leading on

    creation o the bag bill and using the proceeds tound additional trash reduction measures, and

    having an overall plan to achieve a swimmable

    and shable nacostia River. DC did howeverreceive a mixed grade or toxics remediation,refecting an incomplete they are taking

    strong steps to move orward at certain sites,

    but much work remains to be done at those

    sites and other sites still must be brought into aclean-up ramework.

    ontgomery ounty also scores well on

    stormwater based on their strong MS4 permit,stormwater utility program, and neighborhood-

    scale retrot projects. verall they score

    well or strategic retrot and restoration

    work, as well as research into problems like

    illicit discharge. However, while we applaud

    the county or implementing a bag bill and

    mandating commercial recycling, they arethus ar doing little else to remove trash rom

    the tributaries. Finally, we are unaware o anyserious work that has been done to assess toxics

    in county streams.

    rince Georges ounty gets a mixed score on

    stormwater: their new stormwater regulations

    are above state minimums but needed to goarther to ensure the health o county streams.

    e stormwater retrot portion o the countysWIP is pretty good but the implementation piece

    needs work. AWS applauds ounty xecutiveRushern Baker or supporting the bag bill, butthe county agencies have not moved on trashTMDL implementation.

    e are concerned about the state o arylands

    activities with regard to the states model MS4permit and proposed hesapeake Bay WIP. arlydrats o both are weak on urban stormwater

    mitigation, with the MS4 template permit havingmany technical shortcomings that will hindereective stormwater retrots.

    e ederal government gets high marks or

    developing the Urban aters pilot program(including the nacostia) and a dedicated

    und or nacostia restoration projects. eare also glad or the initiative several ederal

    agencies have shown in securing a cleanup othe ashington Gas toxic site, but we wish they

    could get more involved at other sites where

    progress has been slower.

    Pepco's Benning Road facility

    A combined sewer outfall

  • 8/2/2019 Sotr Final Web

    8/8

    OUR ULTIMATE GOAL a wabl and fhabl Anaca Rv. Tugh uvau pga cad u by u Advcacy, Envnnal Educan, Rcan,

    and Swadhp a, AWS nchng wad h gal. In d g h, w nd

    duc wa, cal baca, ah, and xc. T gd nw yu can hlp!

    Here are a few ways to help protect and restore the Anacostia River:

    Usewaterwisely. Preventstormwaterrunowithrainbarrels,cisterns,andraingardens.

    Gonativenativeplantsaremadeforourclimatesotheyneedlesswateringandfertilizer.

    Usefertilizerwiselyandsparingly.

    Dontushhazardouswaste,chemicals,orharshcleansersdownthetoiletorthedrain.

    Bringyourownbagstothestore!Plasticbagslittertheriver.

    Pickuptrashyouseeonthegroundbeforeitendsupintheriver.

    BecomeacommunityleaderbyparticipatingintheWatershedStewardsAcademy.

    ReceiveActionAlertsfromAWS.Stayinformedofthelatestwatershedissues

    by subscribing to our ree email updates & event announcements.

    SupporttheAnacostiaWatershedSocietybydonatingandvolunteering!

    For additional information on the Anacostia River, visit www.anacostiaws.org.

    We invite you to Rediscover Your Anacostia by volunteering at

    a cleanup or tree planting, paddling a canoe down the river,

    observing wildlife in the Bladensburg Wetlands and Kenilworth

    Marsh, or participating in one of our other educational,

    stewardship, and recreation programs held throughout the year.

    e nacostia atershed ociety would like to thank the ollowing organizations or technical

    assistance and/or unding or this report card:

    USDA nvironmental Microbial and Food afety Laboratory for the use ofa laboratory to allow usto analyze water for fecal bacteria

    DDOE for providingAWS with water quality monitoring data