solid waste and recycling issues study · 115 s. andrews avenue, room gc430, fort lauderdale, fl...

Scoring Sheet Combination Initial and Final Evaluation Meeting

RFP No. R2113804P1 Solid Waste and Recycling Issues Study

June 9, 2017

115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Finn Name Gretchen Cassini Thomas Hutka Henry Sniezek Purvi Bhogaita Sylvia V. Glazer

Arcadis U.S., Inc. 92 83 84 88 94

HOR Engineering, Inc. 93 75 79 85 73

Scientia Environmental, LLC 27 50 41 26 32

Waste Assessment 47 73 ·54 76 48 Group LLC

TIE BREAKER CRITERIA

1. Vendor located within Broward County as set forth in Subsection 21.31.c.

2. Vendor which provides domestic partner benefits.

Total

441

405

176

298

3. Vendor that has the lowest dollar volume of work, calculated by payments to vendor, by County over a five (5) year period from the date of the submittal.

4. A re-vote or re-assessment of only the tied vendors.

5. Preference to vendor receiving a majority of the total first-place votes.

Local Preference may not be applied to CCNA or Federally funded/governed procurements DELETE if not applicable

PREFERENCE FOR LOCAL VENDORS - RFP's

Ranking

1

2

4

3

For all other competitive solicitations in which objective factors used to evaluate the responses from vendors are assigned point totals, if, upon the completion of final rankings (technical and price combined, if applicable} by the evaluation committee, a non-local business is the highest ranked proposer and the ranking of a local proposer is within five percent (5%) of the ranking obtained by the non-local proposer, the highest-ranked local proposer shall have the opportunity to proceed to negotiations with the county.

Scoring Sheet

Combination Ini t ial a nd Final E v a luation M eeting

RFP No. R2113804P1

Solid Waste and Recyc ling Issues Study

June 9, 2017

115 S. Andrews Ave nue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301

Arcadis U.S., HOR Sciantia

Evaluation C r iteria - Project Spec ific C r i te ria Maximum Inc.

Engineering, Environmental, (Complete text of questions provided sep•ratcly) Points Inc. LLC

1. ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATIONS (Total Maximum 36 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.a 6 ( ;-, ~ 1.. See Evaluation Criteria · question 1.b 12 12 12. 2-See Evaluation Criteria • question 1.c 12 1 ?_ 12 2. See Evaluation Criter ia - question 1.d 6 (o Co Co

2. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL APPROACH

(To tal Maximum 16 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.1 5 5 5 1.._ See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.2 5 4 5 L See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.3 8 ~ ~ L

3. PAST PERFORMANCE (Total Maximum 35 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria· question 3.a 5 i:; s () See Evaluation Criteria· question 3.b 10 tft 1~ f24(f See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.c 10 10 10 0 See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.d 5 ~ ~ 0 See Evaluation Cri teria - question 3.e 5 5 5 2-

4. WORKLOAD OF FIRM

Soe Evaluation Criteri a . question 4 4 4 3 t_ POINTS POINTS POINTS

5. LOCATION ENTERED BY ENTERED BY ENTERED BY PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 CJ 0 0 6. WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET POINTS POINTS POINTS

ENTERED BY ENTERED BY ENTERED BY REQUIREMENTS PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

Soc Evaluation Criteria - question 6 2 l J. ;)_ TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE

CALCULATED BY CALCULATED BY CALCULATED BY PURCHASING PU RCHASING PURCHASING

TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY Max 100 q i q3 ~ 7 PURCHASING Ono Hundred

Gretchen Cassini Name

Waste Assessm ent Group LLC

2. 4-:3' {n

2-2--:i,

1 11&. 5 -~

2-_L

3 POINTS

ENTERED BY PURCHASING

POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

~ TOTAL SCORE

CALCULATED BY PURCHASING

+7

r-L ~ By s igning th is document I certify that I have ab ided b y the Cone or Silence Ord inance and have no t been innuenced or coerced by

Signature anyone in the assignment o f the points by me ror this procurement

-



June 9, 2017


Arcadls U.S., HOR Scientia

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specific C riteria Maximum Inc.

Engineering, Environmental,

(Comploto toxt of questions provided scparatoly) Points Inc. LLC


See Evaluation Criteria· question 1.a 6 5' ~ .3 See Evaluation Criteria • question 1.b 12 If q (p See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.c 12 II ~ Z-Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 1.d 6 (o (/:, J(


(Total Maximum 1 B Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.1 5 '( cf L( See Evalualion Cr iteria - question 2.a.2 5 3 3 3 See Evaluallon Criteria ·question 2.a.3 8 (p ~ .3

3. PAST PERFORMANCE (Total Maximum 35 Points) ··'

See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.a 5 ~ ''* '{ z. See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.b 10 9J 0 § See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.c 10 Cf 8 t-/ See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.d 5 '-( t/ 2-See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.o 5 s- i../ 3

4. WORKLOAD OF FIRM

See Evaluation Criteria - question 4 4 <-./ ~ Lj POINTS POINTS POINTS


Soe Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 0 0 0 6. WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET POINTS POINTS POINTS

REQUIREMENTS ENTERED BY ENTERED BY ENTERED BY PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

Soe Evaluation Criteria • quest ion 6 2 ;)_ J__ ~ TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE

CALCULATED BY CALCULATED BY CALCULATED BY PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY Max 100 <g3 7S- s-o PURCHASING One Hundred

Thomas Hutka -'"°'

Waste Assessment Group LLC

t/ 1 ~ &>

l/ 3 q

z $5

s-S" ~

l/ POINTS


s-POINTS


~ TOTAL SCORE


73

Nam~ _j /J /Y J 17 J{/ - r;jqft7 By signing this document I certify that I have abided by the Cone o f , =r1- ~ Silence Ordinance and have not been influenced or coerced by

Signature - ' I anyone in the assignment of the points by me for this procurement.



June 9, 2017


Arcadis U.S., HOR Sc ientia

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specific C rite r ia Maximum Inc.

Engineering, Env ironmental ,

(Complete text of questions provided separately) Points Inc. LLC

1. ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATIONS (Total Maximum 36 Po ints)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.a 6 6 s 3 See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.b 12 \l \ 0 4-See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.c 12 \O lO 4-See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.d 6 5 5 5


(Total Maximum 18 Points)

See Evaluation Criter ia · question 2.a.1 5 4 4- I See Evaluation Criteria · question 2.a.2 5 4 4- 2. See Evaluation Criteria . question 2.a.3 8 7 4 /Jr 7 4. ft)/ 3 ?A'))_,//


See Evaluation Criteria · question 3.a 5 4- 4 z_ See Evaluation Criteria · question 3.b 10 11 q ~ See Eva luation Criteria - question 3.c 10

°' 7 3

See Evaluation Cri teria - question 3.d 5 4 4- 2. See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.e 5 5 4- z.

4. WORKLOAD OF FIRM

See Evaluation Criteria - quest ion 4 4 4- 4 2-POINTS POINTS POINTS


See Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 f) CJ 0 6. WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET

POINTS POINTS POINTS ENTERED BY ENTERED BY ENTERED BY

REQUIREMENTS PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

See Evaluation Criteria - question 6 2 ;)__ d---- ').__ TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE


TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY Max 100 <Zf 71 t/- I PURCHASING One Hundred

Henry Sniezek .

Wast e Assessm ent Group LLC

3

6 b 5

2.

7

3 ~m--

2-

0 5 ~

z

2-POINTS


s POINTS


~ TOTAL SCORE


S<f

Name ~

~?,,,_ By s igning this document I certify tha t I have abided by the Cone o f

Signaturit' V ~

Silence Ordinance and have not been influenced or coerced b y a nyone in the assignment of the points b y me for this procurement.



June 9, 2017


Arcadis U.S., HOR Sclentia

Evaluation Criteria - Project Sp ecific C ri teria Maximum Eng ineering, Environmental , Inc.

(Complete toxt of questions provided separately) Points Inc. LLC


See Eva luation Criteria . question 1.a 6 UJ ( /) I See Evaluation Criteria · question 1.b 12 II q I See Evaluation Criteria · question 1.c 12 11 JO I Seo Evaluation Cri teri a · question 1.d 6 (/J &; (/J


(Total Maximum 18 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria. question 2.a.1 5 y 5 () Seo Eva luation Criteria - question 2.a.2 5 t- / 5 n See Evaluation Cr iteria - question 2.a.3 8 7 (o f)


See Evaluation Criteria . question 3.a 5 j ~ 0 See Evaluation Criteria • question 3.b 10 JO ,o 10 Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 3.c 10 q· 9 CJ See Evaluation Criteria · question 3.d 5 -5 _j n See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.e 5 ' f) 5 I

4. WORKLOAD OF FIRM

See Evaluat ion Cr iteria - question 4 4 0 2 i-/ POINTS POINTS POINTS


See Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 (!) 0 0 6. WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET

POINTS POINTS POINTS ENTERED BY ENTERED BY ENTERED BY

REQUIREMENTS PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 6 2 iX.. ~ ~ TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE


TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY Max 100

&?5 gS' ;)_ {, PURCHASING One Hundred

Purvi Bhogaita Name


'-( Co 7 ~

If 3 0J

:~

9 9

.5 3

'I POINTS


S' POINTS


;;z TOTAL SCORE


7b

(_ 7)~ E/l?U._JA~ By signing this document I certify tha t I have abided by the Cone of

S ilence Ordinance and have not been influenced or coerced by Signature 0 anyone in the assignment of the points by me for this procurement.

~

fPJ

nG



June 9, 2017


Arcadis U .S., HOR Scientia

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specific Criteria Maximum Inc .

Engineering, Envi ronmental,

(Complete text of questions provided separately) Points Inc . LLC

1. ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATIONS (Total Maximum 36 Points) -

See Evaluation Criteria · question 1.a 6 h '-I §.. See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.b 12 /,,/(_ In ~ See Evaluation Criteria· question 1.c 12 II 9 ~-

See Evaluation Criteria - question 1.d 6 ~ 0 0 2. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND TECHNICAL

APPROACH (Total Maximum 1 B Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.1 5 $ ? See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.2 5 6 .3 I See Evaluation Criteria - question 2.a.3 8 C?J ~


See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.a 5 s- 4 I See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.b 10 /D /0 ;2J See Evaluation Criteria - question 3 .c 10 / () 7 I

j

See Evaluation Criteria - question 3.d 5 s- L/ . , J

See Evaluation Criteria • question 3.e 5 .s- ~" q ·! il'

. 4. WORKLOAD OF FIRM ,J

See Evaluation Criteria - question 4 4 I I _l'?i --~ I POINTS POINTS POINTS


See Evaluation Criteria · question 5 5 0 0 CJ

6. WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET POINTS POINTS POINTS

ENTERED BY ENTERED BY ENTERED BY REQUIREMENTS PURCHASING PURCHASING PURCHASING

See Evaluation Criteria • question 6 2 ~ J_ ')_ TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE


TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY Max 100 q <f 7 3 3 J. PURCHASING One Hundred

Sylvia V. Glazer


~

4 ~ s-(" h

~ I

a....

I /() ~ ~ ~ -

I POINTS


5" POINTS


~ TOTAL SCORE


t_J-g

"m•/l.iir V ~ ~signing this document I certi fy that I have abided b y the Cone o f S ilence Ord inance and have not been influenced or coerced by

Sigr'6tur r I II I A' anyone in the assignment o f the points by me for this p rocurement.

I(/ u {/

~

I"

solid waste and recycling issues study · 115 s. andrews avenue, room gc430, fort lauderdale, fl...

Documents