solar photovoltaic outline applications

9
Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010 ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 1 Solar Photovoltaic Solar Photovoltaic Applications Applications Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering 483 Alternative Energy Alternative Energy Engineering II Engineering II April 26, 2010 2 Outline Midterm exam results Meet on Wednesday at PPM Conference room for photovoltaic tour Photovoltaic basics Applications of photovoltaic systems Costs and cell efficiencies • Conclusions 3 Midterm Results Number of students: 30 Maximum possible score: 90 Mean: 43.8 • Median: 43 Standard Deviation: 15.4 10 18 23 24 31 32 32 34 34 37 37 40 41 41 42 44 46 48 49 50 51 52 54 54 56 58 58 67 69 81 4 Midterm Problem One Given: Spectral emissivity Find: Solar radiation absorbed 0.88 3.5 μm 0.24 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Wavelength (μm) Emissivity [ ] ( ) ( ) 8710 . 0 9859 . 0 1 24 . 0 0 9859 . 0 88 . 0 ) 300 , 20 ( 1 24 . 0 ] 0 ) 3200 , 20 ( [ 88 . 0 = + = μ = λ + μ = λ = ε = α K m T f K m T f solar solar For 800 W/m 2 incoming solar radiation the absorbed radiation is (0.8710)(800 W/m2) = 696.8 W/m 2 . b. If the surface is opaque, what happens to the radiation that is not absorbed? It is reflected. 5 Midterm Problem One II c. What is the emissive power of the surface if its temperature is 340 K? [ ] ( ) ( ) 2413 . 0 00201 . 0 1 24 . 0 0 00201 . 0 88 . 0 ) 190 , 1 ( 1 24 . 0 ] 0 ) 190 , 1 ( [ 88 . 0 340 340 = + = = + = = = K m T f K m T f K K μ λ μ λ ε α ( ) ( ) 4 4 2 8 4 340 10 6704 . 5 2413 . 0 K K m W x T E = = σ ε E = 182.8 W/m 2 d. What is the total amount of radiant energy leaving the surface? It is sum of the emissive power, 182.8 W/m 2 , plus reflected energy, 800 W/m 2 – 696.8 W/m 2 = 103.2 W/m 2 . Total radiant energy leaving the surface is 286.1 W/m 2 . 6 Midterm Problem Two Given: problem one surface is absorber plate in solar collector at 340 K. Glass plate has T = 320 K and ε = 0.85. h gap = 3.5 W/m 2 ·K. Find: heat transfer, per unit areabetween the absorber plate and the lower glass plate? ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [ ] 2 4 4 4 2 8 2 2 4 2 4 2 2 8 . 107 1 85 . 0 1 2413 . 0 1 320 340 10 6704 . 5 320 340 5 . 3 1 1 1 m W K K K m W x K K K m W A Q T T A T T A h Q c top g P g P c g P c g p top = + + = + + = ε ε σ

Upload: others

Post on 19-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 1

Solar Photovoltaic Solar Photovoltaic ApplicationsApplications

Larry CarettoMechanical Engineering 483

Alternative Energy Alternative Energy Engineering IIEngineering II

April 26, 2010

2

Outline• Midterm exam results• Meet on Wednesday at PPM

Conference room for photovoltaic tour• Photovoltaic basics• Applications of photovoltaic systems• Costs and cell efficiencies• Conclusions

3

Midterm Results• Number of students: 30• Maximum possible score: 90• Mean: 43.8• Median: 43• Standard Deviation: 15.410 18 23 24 31 32 32 34 34 37

37 40 41 41 42 44 46 48 49 50

51 52 54 54 56 58 58 67 69 814

Midterm Problem One• Given: Spectral

emissivity• Find: Solar radiation

absorbed

0.88

3.5 μm

0.24

00.1

0.20.30.40.5

0.60.70.8

0.91

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Wavelength (μm)

Emis

sivi

ty

[ ]( ) ( ) 8710.09859.0124.009859.088.0

)300,20(124.0]0)3200,20([88.0=−+−=

⋅μ=λ−+−⋅μ=λ=ε=α KmTfKmTfsolarsolar

For 800 W/m2 incoming solar radiation the absorbed radiation is (0.8710)(800 W/m2) = 696.8 W/m2.b. If the surface is opaque, what happens to the radiation that is not absorbed? It is reflected.

5

Midterm Problem One IIc. What is the emissive power of the surface

if its temperature is 340 K?[ ]

( ) ( ) 2413.000201.0124.0000201.088.0)190,1(124.0]0)190,1([88.0340340

=−+−=⋅=−+−⋅=== KmTfKmTfKK μλμλεα

( ) ( )442

84 340106704.52413.0 K

KmWxTE

⋅==

σε E = 182.8 W/m2

d. What is the total amount of radiant energy leaving the surface? It is sum of the emissive power, 182.8 W/m2, plus reflected energy, 800 W/m2

– 696.8 W/m2 = 103.2 W/m2. Total radiant energy leaving the surface is 286.1 W/m2.

6

Midterm Problem Two• Given: problem one surface is absorber plate

in solar collector at 340 K. Glass plate has T = 320 K and ε = 0.85. hgap = 3.5 W/m2·K.

• Find: heat transfer, per unit areabetween the absorber plate and the lower glass plate?

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )[ ]2

4442

8

2

2

42

4

22

8.107

185.01

2413.01

320340106704.5

3203405.3

111

mWKK

KmWx

KKKm

WA

QTTATTAhQ

c

top

gP

gPcgPcgptop

=−+

−⋅+

−⋅

=⇒−+

−+−=

εε

σ

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 2

7

Midterm Problem Two II• Is Q in part a less than, greater, than or

equal to Qtop? It is equal• Find: heat transfer coefficient, UP-g2, between

the absorber plate and the lower glass plate?

( ) ( ) ( ) KmW

KKm

W

TTA

Q

TTAQ

UgP

c

top

gPc

topgP

⋅=

−=

−=

−=− 2

2

222

39.5320340

8.107

• Is UP-g2 less than, greater, than or equal to Utop? It is greater; it has the same heat flow, Qtop, with a smaller temperature difference

8

Midterm Problem Three• Given: solar collector rating sheet.• Find: efficiency for Tin = 40oC, I = 800

W/m2 and ambient temperature = 20oC

• Find: Tout for water using test flow rate from sheet and previous data

%1.628002001203.0

8002026090.3709.001203.026090.3709.0

22=−−=−−=η

IP

IP

( ) ( )C

CkgJ

mLm

mkg

smL

sWJm

mW

CcmIAT

cmQTT o

o

o

p

cin

p

uinout 1.46

418410

100048

1411.2800%1.6240

6

3

3

22

=

⋅+=η

+=+=&&

9

Midterm Problem Three II• Find: fraction of 90 therms/month from

collector for solar radiation = 4 kWh/m2/day for 30-day month with τα/(τα)n = 0.94, = 17.8oC, and F’R/FR = 0.97.

• FRUc = negative slope = 3.975 W/m2⋅oC and FR(τα)n = intercept = 0.715; 90 therms/mo = (90x105Btu/therm)(1.055 kJ/Btu)(GJ/106 kJ) = 9.495 GJ/mo. Htotal= (30 days) (4 kWh/m2/day) (0.0036 GJ/kWh) = 0.432 GJ/m2/month. FRUc = (3.975 W/m2⋅oC)(10-9 GJ/W⋅s)(3600 s/hr)(24 hr/day)(30 days/mo) = 0.01030 GJ/m2/mo,

aT

10

Midterm Problem Three III

• f = 1.029Y – 0.065X – 0.245Y2 + 0.0018X2 + 0.0215Y3 = 1.029(0.0715) –0.065(0.2086) – 0.245(0. 0715)2 + 0.0018(0.2086)2 + 0.0215(0.0715)3 = 5.89% of the monthly heating load is supplied by solar

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2086.08.17100495.9

97.001030.0411.2 22

'=⎥

⎤⎢⎣

⎡−

⋅=

⎥⎥⎦

⎢⎢⎣

⎡−

Δ= CC

GJmo

momGJmTT

Dt

FFUFAX oo

arefR

RcRc

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) 0715.0495.9

432.0

94.097.0715.0411.222,

'=

⎥⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢⎢

⎡⋅=

⎥⎥⎦

⎢⎢⎣

τατα

τα=

moGJmomGJ

mD

HFFFAY totali

nR

RnRc

11

Wednesday Class Meeting• Meet in PPM

Conference room

• Entrance from Lot C6

• Near corner of Halsted and Etiwanda

12Slides with NIST logo shown here

taken from this presentation

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 3

13 14

Cells in Modules in Arrays

• Solar cell

• Solar module • Solar array

15

Basic Concepts• Direct conversion of light energy into

electrical current• Based on adsorption of light photon with

energy E = hν = hc/λ– Planck’s constant: h = 6.62607x10-23 J·s– Light speed: c = 299,792,458 m/s– frequency(s-1) = ν wavelength (m) = λ

• E = hν also basis for spectrum of blackbody radiation

16

Semiconductors• Conductors have lots of free electrons

to conduct heat and electricity• Insulators have almost no free electrons• Pure semiconductors can produce

some free electrons leaving electron-deficient atoms known as holes

• Doped semiconductors add materials with different number of valence electrons

17

Semiconductors II• Silicon has 4 electrons in valence band• Adding phosphorus with 5 electrons in

its valance band makes it easier for the doped material to release free electrons– This is called an n-type material

• Adding aluminum with 3 electrons in its valance band makes it easier for the doped material to produce holes– This is called a p-type material

18

Semiconductors III• Joining n-type and p-type materials

results in a pn junction• Electrons and holes flow across junction

to rejoin• External circuit is more efficient

mechanism for electrons to rejoin holes• Solar cell is pn junction where photons

provide energy for electrons to become free electrons

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 4

19

Semiconductors to Solar Cells• Physics of solids visualizes valance

band where electrons are linked to atom and conduction band for free electrons

• Free electrons have higher energy• Band gap is energy difference between

valance band and conduction band• Photon from sunlight must have enough

energy to move electron from valance to conduction band

20

Silicon Band Gap = 1.11 eV• E = 1.11 eV = hc/λ gives λ = 1.12 μm• Less energetic photons (λ > 1.12 μm)

will not release an electron• Higher energy photons (λ < 1.12 μm)

will release electron and produce heat• Radiant energy not releasing electron

will be reflected or absorbed• For λT ≤ (1.12 μm)(5800 K) = 6578.45 μm·K solar fraction is 77.5% (not all used)

21http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/solarcell/javasolarcellfigure1.jpg

Link to Demo

22

Solar Cell Current Density

• See Hodge pp 231-232 for derivation– Current density JL = IL/A delivered to load– Internal current densities across p-n junction:

p-to-n, J0, and n-to-p, Jr, net Jj = Jr – Jo

– Cell output current density Js; JL = Js – Jj

– e0 = electron charge = 1.60218x10-19 J/V– k = Boltzmann’s constant = 1.381x10-23 J/K– V = cell voltage

kTVe

oosL eJJJJ0

−+=

23

Solar Cell Output• JL = 0 gives open circuit voltage

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−=⇒=−+= 10

0

0

o

soc

kTVe

oosL JJ

ekTVeJJJJ

sooskTe

oosL JJJJeJJJJ =−+=−+=00

• V = 0 gives short circuit current

kTVe

s

o

s

o

s

LkTVe

oosL eJJ

JJ

JJeJJJJ

00

1 −+=⇒−+=24

Solar Cell Output II• For given open circuit voltage, e0 and

temperature, T, find J0/Js

1

110

0

0 +=⇒⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−=

kTVeJ

JJJ

ekT

ocso

s

• Use this J0/Js to plot JL/Js versus V

1

11110

00

+

−−=

⎥⎥⎦

⎢⎢⎣

⎡−−=

kTVe

eeJJ

JJ

oc

kTVe

kTVe

s

o

s

L

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 5

25

Solar Cell Power• P = ILV = JLAV

⎟⎟⎟⎟

⎜⎜⎜⎜

+

−−===

1

110

0

kTVe

eAVJJJAVJAVJP

oc

kTVe

ss

LsL

⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟

⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜

+

++−+=

⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟

⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜

+

+⎟⎟⎟⎟

⎜⎜⎜⎜

+

−−=

1

11

11

110

000

0

0

0

0 00

kTVe

kTVe

kTVe

kTVe

s

kTVe

kTVe

s

kTVe

kTVe

soc

oc

ococ

e

ekTVeee

AJ

e

ekTe

AVJ

e

eAJdVdP

0120 max0max00

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ −++⇒=

kTVeee

dVdP PkT

VekTVe Poc

• dP/dV = 0 gives Pmax

Solve numerically for VPmax = V at Pmax

26

Solar Cell Parameters

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1

V/Vopen circuit

I load

/I sho

rt c

ircui

t and

P/P

max

CurrentP/PmaxV at PmaI at Pmax

27 28

29 30

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 6

31 32

33 34

35

http://www.solarbuzz.com/Photos/moduleprices10-4.jpg

36

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 7

37

Photovoltaic Shipments

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/solarreport/solarpv,html

38

Module Types• Crystalline silicon from a wedge of

single-crystal or polycrystalline silicon– Cast, thin-film, or ribbon

• Thin-film from layers of semiconductor material, such as amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS)

• Concentrator uses lenses that gather and concentrate sunlight onto the cell

39

Type of Modules Shipped

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/solarreport/solarpv,html

40

Cell and Module Costs

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/solarreport/solarpv,html

• From manufacturers’ survey

41 42

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 8

43

SF Valley Photovoltaic Costs• From www.findsolar.com• Supply 25% of average 860 kWh/mo• 1.49 kW (peak) – 148 ft2 area• Cost $10,416 ($2,531 after incentives)

– $7000/kW(peak) for entire system• Savings $22/month, $10,995 for 25

years with 4%/year cost increase• Return on investment = 9.3% with

incentives, –3.24% without incentives44

45 46

47 48

Photovoltaic Solar April 26, 2010

ME 483 – Alternative Energy Engineering II 9

49 50

Is Efficiency Important?• Yes and no• Solar energy is free• What is cost per square meter of solar

photovoltaic cell?– Solar cell costs most expensive

• Low efficiency, low cost could be better– Auxiliary costs for structure

• High efficiency will always be better here

51

Organic Photovoltaic• η < 6%• Lower

cost than Silicon

• Lifetime a few 1000 hours

• Goals: 10% and 10,000 h

http://www.robaid.com/wp-content/gallery/cache/ 198__400x300_nist-organic-photovoltaics.jpg 52

Solar Conclusions• Promise of large amounts of pollution-

free energy with significant limitations– Low energy flux requires large area– Costs for current solar materials are not

justified by cost savings– Solar peak matches electricity demand and

thermal storage extends generation time– Science of solar energy well understood,

but problems with pervious commercial – Still need significant cost reductions to

make solar PV cost effective