soil survey of massac county, illinois

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

NaturalResourcesConservationService

In cooperation withIllinois AgriculturalExperiment Station

Soil Survey ofMassac County,Illinois

The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of smallareas.

To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to MapSheets. Note the number of the map sheet and go to that sheet.

Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are inthat area. Go to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name andshows the page where each map unit is described.

The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailedsoil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may addressyour specific needs.

iii

How To Use This Soil Survey

Additional information about the Nations natural resources is available onlinefrom the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov.

iv

National Cooperative Soil Survey

This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effortof the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, Stateagencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. TheNatural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) hasleadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2000. Soil names anddescriptions were approved in 2002. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in thispublication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2002. This survey was madecooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the IllinoisAgricultural Experiment Station. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnishedto the Massac County Soil and Water Conservation District. Financial assistance wasprovided by the Massac County Board, the Illinois Department of Agriculture, and theUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Soil maps in this survey maybe copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could causemisunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the smallareas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale.

Nondiscrimination Statement

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all itsprograms and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, or,where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexualorientation, genetic information, or political beliefs, as a means of reprisal, or becauseall or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Notall prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who requirealternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,audiotape, etc.) should contact USDAs TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice andTDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights,1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 800-795-3272(voice) or 202-720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

v

ContentsCover ............................................................................................................................ iHow To Use This Soil Survey .................................................................................... iiiContents ....................................................................................................................... vForeword ..................................................................................................................... xiIntroduction ................................................................................................................. 1

General Nature of the County ................................................................................... 3How This Soil Survey Was Made .............................................................................. 5

Detailed Soil Map Units ............................................................................................. 799GSandstone and Limestone Rock Land, 35 to 90 percent slopes ..................... 8131BAlvin fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ................................................. 9131CAlvin fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes ............................................... 9131C2Alvin fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ...............................10131D2Alvin fine sandy loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded.............................. 11131FAlvin fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes.............................................12164AStoy silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................................12164BStoy silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ............................................................13164C2Stoy silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ...........................................14165AWeir silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...........................................................15175BLamont fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ............................................15175C2Lamont fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ...........................16175D2Lamont fine sandy loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded .........................17214BHosmer silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ......................................................18214C2Hosmer silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ......................................18214C3Hosmer silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded ........................19214D2Hosmer silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded ....................................20214D3Hosmer silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded ......................21308BAlford silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ..........................................................22308C2Alford silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded .........................................22308C3Alford silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded ...........................23308D2Alford silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded .......................................24308D3Alford silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded..........................25308EAlford silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes ......................................................26308E2Alford silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded .......................................27308E3Alford silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded..........................27308FAlford silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes ......................................................28339CWellston silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes ...................................................29339C2Wellston silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ....................................30339DWellston silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes .................................................30339D2Wellston silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded ..................................31339D3Wellston silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded .....................32339FWellston silt loam, 18 to 35 percent slopes .................................................33340C2Zanesville silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ...................................34340C3Zanesville silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded .....................34340DZanesville silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes ................................................35340D2Zanesville silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded .................................36

vi

340D3Zanesville silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded ...................37453C2Muren silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded.........................................38453D2Muren silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded .......................................39691DBeasley silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes ..................................................39691FBeasley silt loam, 18 to 35 percent slopes ..................................................40691GBeasley silt loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes ..................................................41801BOrthents, silty, undulating ............................................................................42802DOrthents, loamy, hilly ...................................................................................42864Pits, quarries ..................................................................................................43865Pits, gravel .....................................................................................................43955DMuskingum and Berks soils, 10 to 18 percent slopes ..................................44955D2Muskingum and Berks soils, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded ...................45955FMuskingum and Berks soils, 18 to 35 percent slopes ..................................46955GMuskingum and Berks soils, 35 to 70 percent slopes .................................47956BBrandon-Saffell complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes ...........................................48956C2Brandon-Saffell complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded ...........................49956C3Brandon-Saffell complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded .............50956DBrandon-Saffell complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes .......................................51956D2Brandon-Saffell complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded .........................52956D3Brandon-Saffell complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded ...........54956E2Brandon-Saffell complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded .........................55956FBrandon-Saffell complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes ........................................56986DWellston-Berks complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes .......................................57986D2Wellston-Berks complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded ........................58986FWellston-Berks complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes .......................................59986GWellston-Berks complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes .......................................601843ABonnie and Petrolia soils, undrained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently

flooded ..............................................................................................................611846AKarnak and Cape silty clays, undrained, 0 to 2 percent slopes,

frequently flooded ..............................................................................................633070ABeaucoup silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ..........643071ADarwin silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........................653071LDarwin silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long

duration .............................................................................................................653072ASharon silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........................663072LSharon silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long

duration .............................................................................................................673108ABonnie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........................683108LBonnie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long

duration .............................................................................................................693180ADupo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ...........................693288APetrolia silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ..............703288LPetrolia silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long

duration .............................................................................................................713382ABelknap silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded .......................72

vii

3382LBelknap silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, longduration .............................................................................................................73

3422ACape silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ..................743422A+Cape silt loam, overwash, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........743426AKarnak silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........................753426A+Karnak silt loam, overwash, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded .....763426LKarnak silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long

duration .............................................................................................................773449LArmiesburg-Sarpy complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded,

long duration .....................................................................................................783597AArmiesburg silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........793597LArmiesburg silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded,

long duration .....................................................................................................807131AAlvin fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded .......................807131BAlvin fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded .......................817131C2Alvin fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded.......827131D2Alvin fine sandy loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded, rarely

flooded ..............................................................................................................837460AGinat silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded .................................847462ASciotoville silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded ..........................857462BSciotoville silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded ..........................857462C2Sciotoville silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded .........867462C3Sciotoville silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded, rarely

flooded ..............................................................................................................877462D2Sciotoville silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded ........887462D3Sciotoville silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded, rarely

flooded ..............................................................................................................897463AWheeling silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded ...........................907463BWheeling silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded ...........................907463C2Wheeling silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded...........917463D2Wheeling silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded .........927463E2Wheeling silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded .........937483AHenshaw silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded ...........................947711AHatfield silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded ..............................947711BHatfield silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded ..............................957711B2Hatfield silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded, rarely flooded ................968070ABeaucoup silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally

flooded ..............................................................................................................978071ADarwin silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ....................988072ASharon silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ....................988108ABonnie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ....................998109ARacoon silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ................. 1008180ADupo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ..................... 1018288APetrolia silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ....... 1028382ABelknap silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ................ 102

viii

8420APiopolis silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ....... 1038422ACape silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ........... 1048422A+Cape silt loam, overwash, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally

flooded ............................................................................................................ 1058426AKarnak silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ................. 1068426A+Karnak silt loam, overwash, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally

flooded ............................................................................................................ 1078427BBurnside silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ............... 1078469AEmma silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ......... 1088469BEmma silty clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ......... 1098469C2Emma silty clay loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded, occasionally

flooded ............................................................................................................ 1108597AArmiesburg silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally

flooded ............................................................................................................ 1118693AHurst silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ........... 111MWMiscellaneous water .................................................................................... 112WWater .............................................................................................................. 112

Use and Management of the Soils ......................................................................... 113Interpretive Ratings ................................................................................................ 113Agronomy .............................................................................................................. 114

Limitations and Hazards Affecting Cropland ...................................................... 114Limitations and Hazards Affecting Pastureland.................................................. 116Yields per Acre .................................................................................................. 118Land Capability Classification ........................................................................... 119Prime Farmland ................................................................................................. 120

Hydric Soils ........................................................................................................... 121Forestland Management ........................................................................................ 122Forestland Productivity .......................................................................................... 123Windbreaks and Environmental Plantings .............................................................. 123Recreation ............................................................................................................. 124Wildlife Habitat ...................................................................................................... 125Engineering ........................................................................................................... 127

Building Site Development ................................................................................. 128Sanitary Facilities ............................................................................................. 129Construction Materials ...................................................................................... 131Water Management ........................................................................................... 133

Soil Properties ......................................................................................................... 135Engineering Index Properties ..................................................................................... 135Physical Properties .................................................................................................... 136Chemical Properties ................................................................................................... 138Water Features .......................................................................................................... 139Soil Features ............................................................................................................. 140Classification of the Soils ....................................................................................... 143Soil Series and Their Morphology .............................................................................. 143

Alford Series .......................................................................................................... 144

ix

Alvin Series ........................................................................................................... 145Armiesburg Series ................................................................................................. 146Beasley Series ...................................................................................................... 147Beaucoup Series ................................................................................................... 149Belknap Series ...................................................................................................... 150Berks Series ......................................................................................................... 151Bonnie Series ........................................................................................................ 152Brandon Series ...................................................................................................... 153Burnside Series ..................................................................................................... 155Cape Series ........................................................................................................... 156Darwin Series ........................................................................................................ 157Dupo Series ........................................................................................................... 158Emma Series ........................................................................................................ 160Ginat Series .......................................................................................................... 161Hatfield Series ....................................................................................................... 163Henshaw Series .................................................................................................... 165Hosmer Series....................................................................................................... 167Hurst Series .......................................................................................................... 168Karnak Series ........................................................................................................ 170Lamont Series ....................................................................................................... 172Muren Series ......................................................................................................... 173Muskingum Series ................................................................................................. 174Petrolia Series ....................................................................................................... 176Piopolis Series ...................................................................................................... 177Racoon Series ....................................................................................................... 178Saffell Series ......................................................................................................... 180Sarpy Series ......................................................................................................... 182Sciotoville Series ................................................................................................... 182Sharon Series ........................................................................................................ 184Stoy Series ............................................................................................................ 186Weir Series ........................................................................................................... 188Wellston Series ..................................................................................................... 189Wheeling Series .................................................................................................... 191Zanesville Series .................................................................................................... 192

Formation of the Soils ............................................................................................ 195Factors of Soil Formation ...................................................................................... 195Processes of Soil Formation ................................................................................. 197

References ............................................................................................................... 199Glossary .................................................................................................................... 201Tables ....................................................................................................................... 217

Table 1.Temperature and Precipitation ................................................................ 218Table 2.Freeze Dates in Spring and Fall ............................................................. 219Table 3.Growing Season..................................................................................... 219Table 4.Acreage and Proportionate Extent of the Soils ....................................... 220Table 5.Cropland and Pastureland Limitations and Hazards ............................... 223

x

Issued 2009

Table 6.Land Capability and Yields per Acre of Crops and Pasture .................... 233Table 7.Prime Farmland ..................................................................................... 240Table 8.Map Units With Major Components of Hydric Soils ............................... 241Table 9.Map Units With Minor Components of Hydric Soils ............................... 245Table 10.Forestland Management, Part I ............................................................ 247Table 10.Forestland Management, Part II ........................................................... 260Table 10.Forestland Management, Part III .......................................................... 268Table 11.Forestland Productivity ......................................................................... 281Table 12.Windbreaks and Environmental Plantings ............................................ 295Table 13.Recreational Development, Part I ......................................................... 332Table 13.Recreational Development, Part II ........................................................ 347Table 14.Wildlife Habitat ..................................................................................... 361Table 15.Building Site Development, Part I ......................................................... 370Table 15.Building Site Development, Part II ........................................................ 385Table 16.Sanitary Facilities, Part I ...................................................................... 403Table 16.Sanitary Facilities, Part II ..................................................................... 422Table 17.Construction Materials, Part I .............................................................. 439Table 17.Construction Materials, Part II .............................................................. 451Table 18.Water Management, Part I ................................................................... 469Table 18.Water Management, Part II .................................................................. 483Table 18.Water Management, Part III ................................................................. 500Table 19.Engineering Index Properties ............................................................... 520Table 20.Physical Properties of the Soils ........................................................... 572Table 21.Chemical Properties of the Soils .......................................................... 589Table 22.Water Features .................................................................................... 603Table 23.Soil Features ........................................................................................ 615Table 24.Classification of the Soils ..................................................................... 623

xi

This soil survey contains information that affects land use planning in MassacCounty. It contains predictions of soil behavior for selected land uses. The survey alsohighlights soil limitations, improvements needed to overcome the limitations, and theimpact of selected land uses on the environment.

This soil survey is designed for many different users. Farmers, foresters, andagronomists can use it to evaluate the potential of the soil and the managementneeded for maximum food and fiber production. Planners, community officials,engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers can use the survey to plan landuse, select sites for construction, and identify special practices needed to ensureproper performance. Conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists inrecreation, wildlife management, waste disposal, and pollution control can use thesurvey to help them understand, protect, and enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may imposespecial restrictions on land use or land treatment. The information in this report isintended to identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or landtreatment decisions. Statements made in this report are intended to help the landusers identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations that affect various land uses.The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing lawsand regulations.

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils areseasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are shallow to bedrock. Some are toounstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils arepoorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soilpoorly suited to basements or underground installations.

These and many other soil properties that affect land use are described in this soilsurvey. The location of each soil is shown on the detailed soil maps. Each soil in thesurvey area is described. Information on specific uses is given for each soil. Help inusing this publication and additional information are available at the local office of theNatural Resources Conservation Service or the Cooperative Extension Service.

William J. GradleState ConservationistNatural Resources Conservation Service

Foreword

1

MASSAC COUNTY is near the southern tip of Illinois, near the confluence of theMississippi and Ohio Rivers (fig. 1). The Ohio River flows along the southern andsouthwestern boundaries of Massac County. Metropolis is the county seat and thelargest city in the county. Farming, in combination with forestry, contributes a majorpart to the total income of the county. Corn, soybeans, wheat, hogs, and beef cattleare the leading farm products. Mermet Lake Conservation Area and Fort Massac StatePark in Massac County provide outdoor recreation in the area.

Massac County has an area of 242 square miles. A significant part of the acreageconsists of bottom land and low terraces along the Cache and Ohio Rivers. Theseareas are used mainly for the production of corn, soybeans, and wheat. The distinctlysteep uplands of Massac County are used principally for woodland.

Massac County is a subset of Major Land Resource Areas 120A (Kentucky andIndiana Sandstone and Shale Hills and Valleys, Southern Part) and 134 (SouthernMississippi Valley Loess) (18). See figure 1.

Massac County was established in 1843 out of Johnson and Pope Counties. Thearea was settled by people from the southern states and families of German andScotch descent. The population density is approximately 63 people per square mile(22). Approximately 125,000 acres are in farmland and 29,000 acres are timberland.

Massac County is in the southeastern corner of Illinois. This area has a variety of

Soil Survey ofMassac County, IllinoisBy Dwayne R. Williams, Bryan C. Fitch, and Samuel J. Indorante, Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Original fieldwork by Walter D. Parks, B.J. Weiss, C.C. Miles, and R.D. Busby,Soil Conservation Service

Update fieldwork by Dwayne R. Williams, Edward C. Workman, Samuel J. Indorante,and W. Matt McCauley, Natural Resources Conservation Service

Other fieldwork by Leon R. Follmer, Illinois State Geological Survey, and Bryan Fitch,United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service

Map compilation and geographic information assistance by Jon D. Bathgateand Edward C. Workman, Natural Resources Conservation Service, andDana R. Grantham, Private Contractor

Map digitizing completed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service DigitizingCenter in Salina, Kansas

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service,in cooperation withIllinois Agricultural Experiment Station

Soil Survey of Massac County, Illinois

2

Figure 1.Location of Massac County and major land resourceareas (MLRAs) in Illinois.


3

landforms and relief. A large part of the county consists of alluvial plains and terracesalong the Ohio River and the eastern part of the Cache River Valley. The Ohio Riverforms the southern and southwestern boundary. Massac County is bounded byPulaski County on the west, by Johnson County on the north, by Pope County on thenorthwest, and by McCracken County, Kentucky, on the south. Massac Countyconsists of small towns, forests, barrens, wetlands, orchards, vineyards, pasture, andcropland. The county has an area of approximately 242 square miles and has apopulation of about 15,000. Metropolis is the county seat and has a population ofabout 6,300. Other towns and villages are New Columbia, Mermet, Big Bay, andBrookport. Massac County was established in 1843. Metropolis is at the site of FortMassac, established originally by the French in 1757.

Massac County is served by three State highways, one interstate highway, and anumber of hard-surfaced county roads. Crossing the Ohio River to Kentucky is abridge at Brookport. Several railroads cross Massac County. Barge traffic on the OhioRiver is an important method of commercial and industrial transportation.

There are approximately 434 farms in Massac County (22). The average farm is 287acres in size (22). Most farm owners or operators, however, supplement their incomeby working off the farm. Along with agriculture, a number of small businesses andindustries provide employment in the county. The top five crop commodities, by acres,are soybeans, hay, corn, wheat, and orchards (22). The top three livestockcommodities, by number, are hogs, cattle, and sheep (22). The Shawnee NationalForest occupies about 2,785 acres.

The range in elevation for the county is about 300 feet, from the lowest elevationalong the Ohio River near the western boundary of Pulaski County to the highestelevation on a hill near Barnes Creek in the eastern part of the county near the PopeCounty line (fig. 2).

General Nature of the CountyThis section gives general information about the survey area. It discusses

physiography, relief, drainage, and geology and climate.

Physiography, Relief, Drainage, and Geology

Most of Massac County is in the Cretaceous Hills subsection of the Upper GulfCoastal Plains section of the Coastal Plains Province, which is a northern extension ofthe coastal plains of the southeastern part of the United States. This loess-coveredupland is underlain with Cretaceous-age and Tertiary-age sands and gravel. Part ofMassac County is in the Lesser Shawnee Hills subsection, Shawnee Hills section ofthe Interior Low Plateaus Province (7). This dissected upland is underlain byMississippian-age limestone, sandstone, and shale (23). Massac County is in MajorLand Resource Areas 120A (Kentucky and Indiana Sandstone and Shale Hills andValleys, Southern Part) and 134 (Southern Mississippi Valley Loess).

The northern and eastern parts of Massac County have a general elevationbetween 500 and 580 feet above sea level, with an average relief of 300 feet betweencreek bottom lands and ridgetops. A gently rolling area across central Massac Countyhas a general elevation between 360 and 440 feet and a relief of 40 to 100 feet. TheOhio River and Cache River bottom lands are between 300 and 330 feet above sealevel, and the Ohio River terraces are between 310 and 360 feet above sea level.

During at least a part of the glacial age, the Ohio River flowed more or less fromeast to west from present-day Golconda, Illinois, to the northern part of the surveyarea, and then southwestward through the valley now occupied by the Cache River.The present Ohio River Valley along the southern and southwestern parts of MassacCounty was originally the Tennessee River Valley until the silting of the older Ohio


4

Valley caused the Ohio River to cut through and divide east of Paducah, Kentucky, andto claim the lower Tennessee Valley. During the glacial age, the older Ohio Valley wasan important source of loess.

Massac County is drained by a number of creeks that flow south and east into theOhio River. A part of eastern and northern Massac County drains west to the CacheRiver.

Ground-water supplies in Massac County vary from good or excellent on bottomlands and terraces, where aquifers of sand and gravel occur at various depths, to pooron the uplands of Massac County, where consolidated bedrock occurs (11).

Climate

Table 1 gives data on temperature and precipitation for the survey area as recordedat Brookport, Illinois, in the period 1971 to 2000. Table 2 shows probable dates of thefirst freeze in fall and the last freeze in spring. Table 3 provides data on the length ofthe growing season.

In winter, the average temperature is 36.7 degrees F and the average dailyminimum temperature is 27.6 degrees. The lowest temperature on record, whichoccurred at Brookport on December 2, 1982, was -21 degrees. In summer, theaverage temperature is 77.0 degrees and the average daily maximum temperature is87.9 degrees. The highest temperature, which occurred at Brookport on July 14, 1966,was 105 degrees.

Growing degree days are shown in table 1. They are equivalent to heat units.During the month, growing degree days accumulate by the amount that the averagetemperature each day exceeds a base temperature (50 degrees F). The normalmonthly accumulation is used to schedule single or successive plantings of a cropbetween the last freeze in spring and the first freeze in fall.

The total annual precipitation is 48.17 inches. Of this, 27.36 inches, or about 57percent, usually falls in April through October. The growing season for most crops fallswithin this period. The heaviest 1-day rainfall during the period of record was 5.32inches, recorded at Brookport on February 14, 1989. Thunderstorms occur on about60 days each year, and most occur between May and August.

The average seasonal snowfall is 8.3 inches. The most snowfall during a winter was

Figure 2.A generalized relief map of Massac Countyshowing the highest point, more than 590 feetabove sea level (orange dot), and lowest the point,less than 300 feet above sea level (blue dot), in thecounty.


5

35.3 inches in 1984-85. The heaviest 1-day snowfall on record was 10 inches,recorded on March 9, 1994.

The average relative humidity in mid-afternoon is about 58 percent. Humidity ishigher at night, and the average at dawn is about 86 percent. The sun shines 68percent of the time possible in summer and 47 percent in winter. The prevailing wind isfrom the southwest. Average windspeed is highest, around 9 miles per hour, fromNovember to April.

How This Soil Survey Was MadeThis survey was made to update and digitize the 1975 soil survey of Massac

County (20). Major land resource areas (MLRAs) are geographically associated landresource units that share a common land use, elevation, topography, climate, water,soils, and vegetation (18). Massac County is a subset of MLRA 120A (Kentucky andIndiana Sandstone and Shale Hills and Valleys, Southern Part) and MLRA 134(Southern Mississippi Valley Loess) (fig. 1). Map unit design is based on each soilsoccurrence throughout the MLRA. In some cases a soil component may be referred tothat does not occur in the Massac County subset but that has been mapped within theMLRA.

This soil survey includes a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas andtheir location and a discussion of their properties and the subsequent effects onsuitability, limitations, and management for specified uses. During the 1975 soil surveyand as part of this update, soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape ofthe slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; andthe kinds of soil parent materials. Soil scientists also studied and described soilprofiles with the aid of a soil probe or spade. A soil profile is a sequence of naturallayers, or horizons, and extends from the soil surface to the unconsolidated material ata depth of about 6 feet. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other livingorganisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Soil scientistsdescribed new soil profile descriptions and studied profile descriptions from previousfieldwork.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in the county occur in an orderly pattern that isrelated to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the county.Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind orsegment of the landscape. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in thesurvey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landscape, soilscientists develop a concept, or soil-landscape model, of how the soils were formedand the geographic distribution of the soils. Thus, during mapping, this model enablesthe soil scientists to predict with considerable accuracy the kind of soil or soils at aspecific location on the landscape.

Individual soils on the landscape commonly merge into one another as theircharacteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate map, however, soilscientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only alimited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by anunderstanding of the soil-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions ofthe kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they observed.The maximum depth of observation was about 80 inches (6.7 feet). Soil scientistsnoted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rockfragments, distribution of plant roots, soil reaction, and other features that enable themto identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining theirproperties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soilcharacteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for


6

comparison to classify and interpret soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system oftaxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind andcharacter of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. Afterthe soil scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared theindividual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so thatthey could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience andresearch.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the survey areagenerally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Fieldobservations and measurements are also made on selected soils. Soil scientistsinterpret the data from these analyses and tests, as well as the field-observedcharacteristics and the soil properties, to estimate the expected behavior of the soilsunder different uses. Information from other soil surveys and soil studies are also usedto develop soil interpretations.

Soils vary across the landscape and with time. Predictions about soil behavior arebased not only on how soils occur on the landscape but also on such variables asclimate, biological activity, and local land use. Some soil conditions are very stable andpredictable over long periods of time. Examples are clay content in the subsoil andcation-exchange capacity. Some soil conditions change rapidly over the course of ayear but are still predictable. Examples are monthly soil moisture status within certaindepths of the soil profile and monthly depth and duration of ponding in a detailed soilmap unit.

Interpretations for some of the soils are field tested through observation of the soilsin different uses and under different levels of management. National and regional soilinterpretations are modified as necessary to fit local conditions, and some newinterpretations are developed to meet local needs. Map unit descriptions,interpretations, and tables for this soil survey were generated using the National SoilSurvey Information System (NASIS), Version 5.0.

Aerial photographs were taken in 1993. Soil scientists also used U.S. GeologicalSurvey topographic maps enlarged to a scale of 1:12,000 and orthophotographs torelate land and image features. Selected areas of the county were reinvestigated toupdate and refine local soil-landscape models. Soil boundaries from the 1975published soil maps were drawn on the orthophotographs. Adjustments of soilboundary lines were made to coincide with the U.S. Geological Survey topographicmap contour lines, Digital Elevation Models (DEMs), and tonal patterns on aerialphotographs.

The descriptions, names, and delineations of the soils in this survey area may notfully agree with those of the soils in adjacent survey areas. Differences are the resultof a better knowledge of soils, modifications in series concepts, or variations in theintensity of mapping or in the extent of the soils in the survey areas.

7

The map units on the detailed maps represent the soils or miscellaneous areas inthe survey area. The map unit descriptions in this section, along with the maps, can beused to determine the suitability and potential of a unit for specific uses. They also canbe used to plan the management needed for those uses. More information about eachmap unit is given under the headings Use and Management of the Soils and SoilProperties.

A map unit delineation on a map represents an area dominated by one or moremajor kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and namedaccording to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils or miscellaneous areas.Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of thesoils. On the landscape, however, the soils and miscellaneous areas are naturalphenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena.Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined fora taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can bemapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every mapunit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and someminor components that belong to other taxonomic classes.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in themap unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are callednoncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in the mapunit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioralcharacteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management.These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in smallareas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. The contrastingcomponents are mentioned in the map unit descriptions. A few areas of minorcomponents may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentionedin the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it wasimpractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneousareas on the landscape.

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes theusefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate puretaxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landformsegments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation ofsuch segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development ofresource plans, but if intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation isneeded to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives the principal hazardsand limitations to be considered in planning for specific uses.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. All the soils of aseries have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, andarrangement. The soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope,stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. Onthe basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of theareas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil

Detailed Soil Map Units


8

phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example,Alford silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded, is a phase of the Alford series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.These map units are undifferentiated groups or complexes.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areasthat could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similarinterpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion ofthe soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can bemade up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up ofall of them. Bonnie and Petrolia soils, undrained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequentlyflooded, is an undifferentiated group in this survey area.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricatepattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. Thepattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in allareas. Wellston-Berks complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, is an example.

This survey includes miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil materialand support little or no vegetation. Pits, quarries, is an example.

Table 4 gives the acreage and proportionate extent of each map unit. Other tables(see Contents) give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, andpotentials for many uses. The Glossary defines many of the terms used in describingthe soils or miscellaneous areas.

99GSandstone and Limestone Rock Land, 35 to 90percent slopes

General Description

This map unit consists of rock outcrops of sandstone and limestone interspersedwith very stony or bouldery soils and vertical bluffs.

Setting

Landform on landscape: Escarpment on upland

Composition

Sandstone Rock Land and similar inclusions: 45 percentLimestone Rock Land and similar inclusions: 40 percentDissimilar inclusions: 15 percent

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have lesser slope or greater slope

Dissimilar inclusions: Well drained Alford soils and moderately well drained Zanesville soils on the upper

part of backslopes

Interpretive Groups

Land capability classification: 7ePrime farmland: Not prime farmlandHydric soils: No


9

131BAlvin fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Hillside in valleyPosition on landform: Summit and shoulder

Composition

Alvin and similar soils: 90 percentDissimilar soils: 10 percent

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Well drained Lamont and Wheeling soils in similar slope positions Somewhat poorly drained Roby soils in less sloping areas

Soil Properties and Qualities

Parent material: Loamy alluvium and/or eolian sandsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Moderately rapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.6 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: LowPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very lowWater erosion susceptibility: LowWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups

Land capability classification: 2ePrime farmland: All areas are prime farmlandHydric soil: No

131CAlvin fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Hillside in valleyPosition on landform: Backslope and shoulder

Composition


Inclusions



10



Parent material: Loamy alluvium and/or eolian sandsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Moderately rapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.6 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: LowPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: LowWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups


131C2Alvin fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes,eroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner or thicker surface horizons Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet



Parent material: Loamy alluvium and/or eolian sandsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Moderately rapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.6 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: Low


11

Accelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: LowWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups


131D2Alvin fine sandy loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes,eroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner or thicker surface horizons Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet



Parent material: Loamy alluvium and/or eolian sandsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Moderately rapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.6 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: LowAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: LowWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups

Land capability classification: 4ePrime farmland: Farmland of statewide importanceHydric soil: No


12

131FAlvin fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Hillside in valleyPosition on landform: Backslope

Composition


Inclusions


Dissimilar inclusions: Well drained Lamont and Wheeling soils in similar slope positions


Parent material: Loamy alluvium and/or eolian sandsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Moderately rapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.6 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: LowPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups

Land capability classification: 6ePrime farmland: Not prime farmlandHydric soil: No

164AStoy silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Loess hill on uplandPosition on landform: Summit

Composition

Stoy and similar soils: 90 percentDissimilar soils: 10 percent

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons


13

Dissimilar inclusions: Moderately well drained Hosmer soils in shoulder and backslope positions Poorly drained Weir soils on summits


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Somewhat poorly drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: SlowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: SlowDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 10.0 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.0 foot; January to MayPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: High for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: LowWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups

Land capability classification: 2wPrime farmland: All areas are prime farmlandHydric soil: No

164BStoy silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Loess hill on uplandPosition on landform: Summit and shoulder

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons

Dissimilar inclusions: Moderately well drained Hosmer soils in shoulder and backslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Somewhat poorly drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: SlowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: SlowDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 10.0 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.0 foot; January to MayPotential frost action: High


14

Corrosivity: High for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: HighWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


164C2Stoy silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded

Setting

Landform on landscape: Loess hill on uplandPosition on landform: Backslope and shoulder

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thicker or thinner surface horizons

Dissimilar inclusions: Moderately well drained Hosmer soils in shoulder and backslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Somewhat poorly drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: SlowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: SlowDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 9.2 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.0 foot; January to

MayAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: High for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very highWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups



15

165AWeir silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Flat on uplandPosition on landform: Summit

Composition

Weir and similar soils: 90 percentDissimilar soils: 10 percent

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons Soils that have darker surface horizons

Dissimilar inclusions: Moderately well drained Hosmer soils in shoulder and backslope positions Somewhat poorly drained Stoy soils in shoulder and footslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Poorly drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Very slowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: SlowDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 9.1 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.5 percentShrink-swell potential: HighHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): At the surface; January to

JunePonding (average depth during wettest periods or after heavy rainfall): 0.2 footFlooding: NonePotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: High for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: HighWater erosion susceptibility: LowWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups

Land capability classification: 3wPrime farmland: Farmland of statewide importanceHydric soil: Yes

175BLamont fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes

Setting

Landform on landscape: Dune in valleyPosition on landform: Summit and shoulder

Composition

Lamont and similar soils: 90 percentDissimilar soils: 10 percent


16

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Areas that are occasionally flooded Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Roby soils in lower areas Well drained Alvin and Landes soils in similar slope positions


Parent material: Eolian depositsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: RapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.6 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.8 to 1.5 percentShrink-swell potential: LowPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and moderate for concretePotential for surface runoff: NegligibleWater erosion susceptibility: LowWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups


175C2Lamont fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes,eroded

Setting

Landform on landscape: Dune in valleyPosition on landform: Shoulder and backslope

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Areas that have thinner or thicker surface horizons Areas that are occasionally flooded

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Roby soils in lower areas Well drained Alvin soils in similar slope positions


Parent material: Eolian depositsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapid


17

Permeability below a depth of 60 inches: RapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.3 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: LowAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and moderate for concretePotential for surface runoff: LowWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high

Interpretive Groups


175D2Lamont fine sandy loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes,eroded

Setting

Landform on landscape: Dune in valleyPosition on landform: Backslope

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Areas that have thinner or thicker surface horizons Areas that are occasionally flooded Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Roby soils in lower areas Well drained Alvin soils in similar slope positions


Parent material: Eolian depositsDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Moderately rapidPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: RapidDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 7.3 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: LowAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: ModerateCorrosivity: Low for steel and moderate for concretePotential for surface runoff: LowWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Moderately high


18

Interpretive Groups


214BHosmer silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes

Setting


Composition

Hosmer and similar soils: 85 percentDissimilar soils: 15 percent

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons Well developed fragipan soils that have a thinner loess cap Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 1.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Stoy soils in summit and shoulder slope positions Well drained Alford soils in shoulder and summit positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Moderately well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Very slowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Very slow to moderateDepth to restrictive feature: 20 to 36 inches to a fragipanAvailable water capacity: About 8.0 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.5 feet; January to AprilPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very highWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


214C2Hosmer silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded

Setting



19

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner or thicker surface horizons Well developed fragipan soils that have a thinner loess cap Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 1.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Stoy soils in summit and shoulder slope positions Well drained Alford soils in shoulder and backslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Moderately well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Very slowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Very slow to moderateDepth to restrictive feature: 20 to 36 inches to a fragipanAvailable water capacity: About 7.5 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.5 feet; January to AprilAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very highWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


214C3Hosmer silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severelyeroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thicker surface horizons Well developed fragipan soils that have a thinner loess cap Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 1.5 feet


20

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Stoy soils in summit and shoulder slope positions Well drained Alford soils in shoulder and backslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Moderately well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Very slowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Very slow to moderateDepth to restrictive feature: 20 to 36 inches to a fragipanAvailable water capacity: About 7.2 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.5 feet; January to AprilAccelerated erosion: Surface layer is mostly subsoil materialPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very highWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


214D2Hosmer silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded

Setting

Landform on landscape: Loess hill on uplandPosition on landform: Backslope

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thicker or thinner surface horizons Well developed fragipan soils that have a thinner loess cap Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 1.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Stoy soils in summit and shoulder slope positions Well drained Alford soils in backslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Moderately well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Very slowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Very slow to moderateDepth to restrictive feature: 20 to 36 inches to a fragipanAvailable water capacity: About 7.5 inches to a depth of 60 inches


21

Organic matter content of surface layer: 1.0 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.5 feet; January to AprilAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very highWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


214D3Hosmer silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes,severely eroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons Well developed fragipan soils that have a thinner loess cap Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 1.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Somewhat poorly drained Stoy soils in summit and shoulder slope positions Well drained Alford soils in backslope positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Moderately well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: Very slowPermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Very slow to moderateDepth to restrictive feature: 20 to 36 inches to a fragipanAvailable water capacity: About 7.2 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateHighest perched seasonal high water table (depth, months): 1.5 feet; January to AprilAccelerated erosion: Surface layer is mostly subsoil materialPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: Very highWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low


22

Interpretive Groups


308BAlford silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes

Setting


Composition

Alford and similar soils: 90 percentDissimilar soils: 10 percent

Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons Soils that have less clay in the subsoil Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Moderately well drained Hosmer and Zanesville soils that have fragipans; in similar

positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.2 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModeratePotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: LowWater erosion susceptibility: ModerateWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


308C2Alford silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded

Setting



23

Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner or thicker surface horizons Soils that have less clay in the subsoil Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet


positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.2 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


308C3Alford silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severelyeroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thicker surface horizons Soils that have less clay in the subsoil Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet


24


positions


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.1 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateAccelerated erosion: Surface layer is mostly subsoil materialPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


308D2Alford silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions



positions Well drained Wellston soils in lower slope postions Areas where sandstone, limestone, or material weathered from cherty limestone

outcrops


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: Moderate


25

Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.1 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


308D3Alford silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severelyeroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions



positions Well drained Wellston soils in lower slope positions Areas where sandstone, limestone, or material weathered from cherty limestone

outcrops


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.1 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 1.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateAccelerated erosion: Surface layer is mostly subsoil materialPotential frost action: High


26

Corrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


308EAlford silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes

Setting


Composition


Inclusions

Similar inclusions: Soils that have thinner surface horizons Soils that have less clay in the subsoil Soils that have a seasonal high water table at a depth of less than 3.5 feet

Dissimilar inclusions: Well drained Wellston soils in lower slope positions Areas where sandstone, limestone, or material weathered from cherty limestone

outcrops


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.2 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModeratePotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups



27

308E2Alford silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded

Setting


Composition


Inclusions


Dissimilar inclusions: Well drained Baxter soils in lower slope positions Areas where sandstone, limestone, or material weathered from cherty limestone

outcrops


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.1 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of surface layer: 0.5 to 2.0 percentShrink-swell potential: ModerateAccelerated erosion: Surface layer has been thinned by erosionPotential frost action: HighCorrosivity: Moderate for steel and high for concretePotential for surface runoff: MediumWater erosion susceptibility: HighWind erosion susceptibility: Low

Interpretive Groups


308E3Alford silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severelyeroded

Setting


Composition



28

Inclusions


Dissimilar inclusions: Well drained Baxter soils in lower slope positions Areas where sandstone, limestone, or material weathered from cherty limestone

outcrops


Parent material: LoessDrainage class: Well drainedSlowest permeability within a depth of 40 inches: ModeratePermeability below a depth of 60 inches: ModerateDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesAvailable water capacity: About 12.1 inches to a depth of 60 inchesOrganic matter content of s

soil survey of massac county, illinois

Documents