soil investigations.pdf

Upload: landon-mitchell

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    1/48

    Soil investigations for assessing the design

    Prof G L Sivakumar Babu

    Department of Civil Engineering

    Indian Institute of Science

    Email: [email protected];

    [email protected]

    Mobile No 9448480671

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    2/48

    Ob ectives

    to ground? How to use them in the analysis of civil

    engineering structures

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    3/48

    Geophysical Methods

    Mechanical Wave Measurements Crosshole Tests (CHT)

    Downhole Tests (DHT) Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves

    Seismic Refraction

    Suspension Logging

    Electromagnetic Wave Techniques Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    Electromagnetic Conductivity (EM)

    Surface Resistivity (SR)

    Magnetometer Surveys (MT)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    4/48

    Mechanical Wave Geophysics Nondestructive measurements (s < 10-4%)

    -

    types (conducted across surface).

    Measurements of wave dispersion:

    velocity, frequency, amplitude, attenuation.

    Determine layering, elastic properties,

    , , Four basic wave types: Compression (P),

    S ear S , ay e g , an ove .

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    5/48

    Mechanical Wave Geophysics Compression (P-) wave is fastest wave;

    .

    Shear (S-) wave is second fastest wave.

    Is irectiona an po arize . Most

    fundamental wave to geotechnique. Rayleigh (R-) or surface wave is very close

    to S-wave velocit 90 to 94% . H brid

    P-S wave at ground surface boundary.

    -

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    6/48

    Mechanical Body Waves

    P-wave

    S-wave

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    7/48

    Mechanical Body Waves

    S RTime

    Oscilloscope

    SourceReceiver (Geophone)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    8/48

    Mechanical Waves (Compression)

    P - Wave Velocities

    Weathered Rocks

    Intact Rocks

    Steel

    Till

    Ice

    Sea Water

    Clay

    Sand

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

    Fresh Water

    Compression Wave Velocity, Vp (m/s)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    9/48

    Mechanical Waves (Shear)

    S - Wave Velocit ie

    Weathered Rocks

    Intact Rocks

    Steel

    Till

    Ice

    Sea Water

    Clay

    Sand

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000

    Fresh Water s =

    Shear Wave Velocity, VS (m/s)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    10/48

    Geophysical Equipment

    Seismograph Spectrum Analyzer

    Portable Analyzer Velocity Recorder

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    11/48

    Seismic Refraction

    oscilloscope

    Note: Vp1 < Vp2

    t1t2

    Determine depthto rock la er z

    Source

    (Plate)

    t3t4

    il: V

    x1x2 xx4zR

    Rock: Vp2

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    12/48

    Seismic Refraction

    0.020

    )

    xV Vc p2 p1

    0.015

    econd

    1

    2

    V V

    c

    p2 p1

    0.010

    Time(s p2

    m/s

    0.005

    Travel

    1 Depth to Rock:

    c = .

    0.000

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    p1 =m/sc = .

    alues

    Distance From Source (meters)

    x values

    t

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    13/48

    Shear Wave Velocity, Vs

    Fundamental measurement in all solids

    , , , ,

    Initial small-strain stiffness represented

    by shear modulus: G0 = Vs2alias G = G = G

    Applies to all static & dynamic problems at

    - s Applicable to both undrained & drained

    loading cases in geotechnical engineering.

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    14/48

    Seismic

    Equipment

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    15/48

    Crosshole TestingOscilloscope

    ASTM D 4428

    Pump

    t x = fctn(z)from incl inometers

    Downhole

    Vs = x/tHammer(Source) Velocity

    TransducerTest

    Receiver)xpackerSlo e

    PVC-casedBorehole

    PVC-casedBorehole

    Note: Verticality of casing

    must be established by

    slope inclinometers to correctdistances x with depth.

    InclinometerInclinometer

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    16/48

    Testing Equipment

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    17/48

    Downhole TestingOscilloscopePump

    with normal load

    tx

    Hammer

    packerz2

    Test

    Depth

    Interval

    HorizontalVelocity

    Transducers

    eop oneReceivers)

    Shear Wave Velocit : R12 = z12 + x2

    Cased

    Borehole

    Vs = R/t 2 = z2 x

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    18/48

    In-Situ Surface Wave Testing

    Signal

    Analyzer

    SensorsSource

    Accelerometer

    L a y e r 1

    RayleighSurface

    L a y e r 2

    aves a y e r L a y e r 4

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    19/48

    Shear Wave Measurements

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    20/48

    Seismic Piezocone Test (SCPTu)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    21/48

    Seismic Piezocone Test

    Obtains Four Inde endent

    VsMeasurements with Depth:Hybrid of Penetrometer

    one ress, qt Penetration Porewater Pressure,u Sleeve Friction, fs

    60ou12 Arrival Time of Downhole Shear

    Wave, ts

    qc

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    22/48

    Automated Seismic Source

    Electronically-actuated Self-contained Left and rightl i tiolarization Modified beam uses finto enhance shear wavegeneration Successfully tested todepths of 20mepths of 20m Capable of being usedwith traditional impulsehammerammer

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    23/48

    Sounding Memphis, Shelby County, TN

    0 10 20 30 40

    q t (MPa)

    0 100 200 300

    fs (kPa)0 1000 2000 3000

    u2 (kPa)

    0 100 200 300 400

    Vs (m/sec)d = 35.7 mm

    5 5 5

    0

    5Vs

    10

    15

    h(m

    )

    10

    15

    10

    15

    10

    15 fs

    20

    25

    Dept

    20

    25

    20

    25

    20

    25

    u2

    30

    35

    30

    35

    30

    35

    30

    35

    qt

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    24/48

    Seismic Flat Dilatometer (SDMT)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    25/48

    Geophysical Methods

    Electromagnetic Wave

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    26/48

    Electromagnetic Wave Geophysics

    Nondestructive methods

    Non-invasive; conducted across surface. Measurements of electrical & ma netic

    properties of the ground: resistivity

    , , ,

    and magnetic fields.

    over w e spec rum n requenc esHz < f < 1022 Hz).

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    27/48

    Electromagnetic Wave Geophysics

    Surface Mapping Techniques:

    Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    Electrical Resistivity (ER) Surveys

    Electromagnetic Conductivity (EM)

    Downhole Techniques

    Resistivity probes, MIPs, RCPTu 2-d and 3-d Tomography

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    28/48

    Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    GPR surveys conducted on gridded areas

    Pair of transmitting and receiver antennae Short im ulses of hi h-fre EM wave

    Relative changes in dielectric properties

    .

    Depth of exploration is soil dependent (up

    to 30 m in dry sands; only 3 m in wetsaturated clay)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    29/48

    Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    Xadar Sensors & Software GeoRadar

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    30/48

    Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    Crossing an underground utility corridor

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    31/48

    Penetrating Radar (GPR)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    32/48

    Ground Penetrating

    Radar GPR

    Geostratigraphy

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    33/48

    Examples of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    Use u in Locating Un ergroun Uti ities

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    34/48

    Results from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    35/48

    Results from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    36/48

    Electrical Resisitivity Measurements

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    37/48

    Electrical Resistivity (ER) Surveys

    Resisitivity R (ohm-m) is an electrical.

    Arrays of electrodes used to measure

    c anges in potentia .

    Evaluate changes in soil types and variationsin pore fluids

    , ,

    sinkholes), stratigraphy, contaminant plumes.

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    38/48

    Resisitivity

    easuremen s

    What will be gained by

    changing electrode

    spac ng

    Depth of ER survey:i.e., greater spacingn uences eepe

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    39/48

    Electrical Resisitivity Measurements

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    40/48

    Electrical Resisitivity Measurements

    Resistivity Values (ConeTec & GeoProbe, 1997)

    Glacial Till

    Weathered Rocks

    Loose Sands

    Sands & Gravels

    Loam

    1 10 100 1000 10000

    ay

    Bulk Resistivity, (ohm-meters)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    41/48

    lect ical Resistivit

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    42/48

    Electromagnetic Conductivity (EM)

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    43/48

    Magnetometer Surveys (MS)

    Measure relative changesn e ear s magne c

    field across a site.

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    44/48

    Applicability of In-Situ Tests

    SPT

    CLAYS SILTS SANDS GRAVELS Cobbles/Bould ers

    ethod

    CPT

    u

    Test DMT

    In-Si

    VST

    0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

    Geophysics

    ra n ze mm

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    45/48

    Equivalent Elastic Modulus

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    46/48

    Equivalent Modulus with Strain Level

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    47/48

    Equivalent Modulus for Monotonic Loading

    1

    o

    0.8

    o,G

    /G

    Cyclic

    0.4

    0.6

    usRat

    Monotonic

    0.2Modul

    Loading

    0

    1E-06 1E-05 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

    Shear Strain

  • 7/29/2019 Soil Investigations.pdf

    48/48

    Conclusions

    Knowledge of state of ground and stateof structure is enhanced usin extensive

    instrumentation

    instrumentation is are useful to design

    ,

    structures under complex stress and