soft/hard complementarity current work and initial perspectives epsrc network meeting 1 mar 01
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“Soft”/”Hard” ComplementarityCurrent Work and Initial Perspectives
EPSRC NetworkMeeting 1
Mar 01
![Page 2: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Topics for discussion
MoD’s Modelling and Simulation Strategy for Analysis
Some personal perspectives from the “Unconventional Analysis” Workshop held last Oct
Current work and issues
![Page 3: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MoD M&S Strategy for Analysis
![Page 4: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MoD M&S Strategy for Analysis: Overview
Version 2 now available
– Written by CDA on behalf of MoD stakeholder community
– Copies can be made available
Contains four Thrust Areas:
– 1. Flexible analysis techniques
– 2. Functionality focus areas - C2 and logistics/sustainability
– 3. Improving the quality and integrity of the analytical process
– 4. Making the best use of technology developments
![Page 5: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Updated Strategy: Key Tenets
A UK MoD Modelling and Simulation Strategy for Analysis
– Used to drive strategies and implementation plans in individual areas
– Not just for CDA/DERA but for all analysis done on MoD’s behalf
Builds on the previous (1997) version
Less model-centric
– Analyst at least as important as the software
– Principles should apply equally to all OA techniques
Embraces work on role of Synthetic Environments in OA
![Page 6: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Thrust 1: Flexible Analysis Techniques
Critical Principles
Delivery of “faster, better, cheaper” analysis
– but still of an appropriate quality
Transition from perception that analyst’s role is
Running the model…to
…supporting the decision (maker)
using analytical techniques
as appropriate to assist
![Page 7: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Thrust 3: Improving the quality and integrity of the analytical process
Critical Principles
Crucial element is fitness for purpose (FFP)
– Determine if something is valid in the context of what it is being used for
FFP embraces ideas from Verification, Validation and
Accreditation
An ability to prove FFP in a timely fashion and at commensurate
cost is also essential
Relies on assessment of Methodology, User, Data, Review,
(Concept)
![Page 8: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Thrust 4: Making best use of technology development
Critical Principles
Capture current practice and capabilities
Maintain an awareness of likely relevant changes in
technology that could be used to support analysis
Provide guidance on best practice and changes to best
practice arising from technology opportunities
![Page 9: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Some Personal Perspectives from the Unconventional Analysis Seminar
![Page 10: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Perspectives (1)
Knowledge of the social processes into which the OR is being fed is vital
This particularly influences "new" methods but applies generally to OR
The hard/soft divide and the debate it engenders is both unhelpful and potentially divisive
– Spectrum vs Quantisation ?
– Techniques such as MCDA crystallise the debate
• They are hard to really soft modellers but soft to really hard modellers !
![Page 11: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Perspectives (2)
Judgements are necessary in all OR and must be made by appropriately qualified and/or empowered individuals.
Analysts need to be aware of all OR techniques
– This needs to be better facilitated by the OR community
– Also demands a willingness to embrace newer methods as appropriate but
equally not to ignore the "classical" OR methods that still have much to offer
There is strength in (managed) diversity
– Back towards our original multi-disciplinary roots ?!
![Page 12: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SummaryCurrent Work and Issues
Current work
– Ideas flowing from MoD M&S Strategy• Work on fitness for purpose across all M&S• Work on best practice capture and promulgation
– Method Logbooks, building on previous work on model validation logbooks
Issues
– What can “Soft” learn from “Hard” ?
– What can “Hard” learn from “Soft” ?
– How can we use them together to best effect ?
– How can we escape the divisive nature of such terminology in future ?
![Page 13: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Underlying Principle 1Using Models of an Appropriate Level
of Complexity
The analytical approach must be simple enough to be understandable, yet able to represent adequately the key features of the problem under consideration
It has long been understood by Operational Analysts that, in dealing with complicated situations, simple models that provide useful insights are often to be preferred to models that get so close to the real world that the mysteries they intend to unravel are repeated in the model and remain mysteries. (The Lanchester Legacy, Vol III Chapter 9 (Bowen, McNaught))
![Page 15: Soft/Hard Complementarity Current Work and Initial Perspectives EPSRC Network Meeting 1 Mar 01](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649b58550346318e8d765b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Put another way...
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.”
….Albert Einstein