socioeconomic, behavioral, and anthropometric risk factors for traumatic dental injuries in...
TRANSCRIPT
Socioeconomic, behavioral, and anthropometric risk factorsfor traumatic dental injuries in childhood: a cohort study
CARLOS ALBERTO FELDENS1, PAULO FLORIANI KRAMER1, ELIANE GERSON FELDENS1,LUANA MORAES PACHECO2 & MARCIA REGINA VITOLO3
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil, 2Graduate Program in Dentistry,
Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil, and 3Department of Nutrition, Universidade Federal de Ciencias da
Sa�ude de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2014; 24:
234–243
Aim. To investigate risk factors for the occurrence
of traumatic dental injuries (TDI) at 4 years of age.
Design. Prospective cohort study.
Methods. A birth cohort (n = 500) was recruited
from the public healthcare system in São Leopoldo,
Brazil. Demographic, socioeconomic, anthropomet-
ric, and behavioral variables were collected at
6 months, 1 year, and 4 years of age. Clinical
examinations at 4 years of age were carried out by
a single examiner using the Andreasen classifica-
tion. Poisson regression was used to determine risk
factors for the occurrence of TDI at 4 years of age.
Results. A total of 23.7% of the children (80/
337) exhibited TDI at 4 years of age. The risk of
TDI was 35% lower among children who had
been breastfeed for ≥6 months relative risk (RR
0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.97) and more than twofold
higher among those who were bottle fed ≥ three
times a day (RR 2.37; 95% CI 1.10–5.11) at
12 months of age. Higher household income in
the first year of life and greater height at 4 years
of age were significantly associated with the
outcome.
Conclusions. The identification of behavioral,
socioeconomic, and anthropometric risk factors for
TDI in early childhood can contribute to the elab-
oration of prevention strategies.
Introduction
Traumatic dental injury (TDI) is among the
most prevalent oral health problems and has
physical, emotional, and economic conse-
quences for the affected individual and his/
her family1–5. There is, however, insufficient
scientific evidence on which to base public
health interventions in the primary dentition.
Nearly, all investigations into the association
between potential risk factors and TDI in the
primary dentition are cross-sectional studies,
which have inherent limitations regarding the
demonstration of causality6. Moreover, the
only risk factor that studies have consistently
indicated is overjet, which is difficult to treat
in the first years of life7–10.
A more comprehensive understanding of
the occurrence of TDI in childhood is needed,
with the identification of factors that can be
the target of interventions. The World Health
Organization recommends the reduction in
risk factors that stem from environmental,
economic, social, and behavioral causes to
improve the oral health of populations11.
There is, however, a gap in the scientific liter-
ature on the possible role of behavioral fac-
tors, especially nutritive and non-nutritive
sucking habits, and anthropometric factors.
Moreover, the findings on the relationship
between TDI and socioeconomic factors are
contradictory10,12–15. Longitudinal studies that
identify risk factors and address the intricate
network of associations can contribute to the
development of programs directed at control-
ling TDI11,16 on both the individual and
collective levels.
The aim of this study was to investigate
demographic, socioeconomic, anthropometric,
and behavioral variables that represent poten-
tial risk factors for the occurrence of TDI in a
birth cohort of preschool children in southern
Brazil.
Correspondence to:
Carlos Alberto Feldens, Rua João Telles 185/1301, Porto
Alegre-RS, Brazil 90.035.121.
E-mail: [email protected]
234 © 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12066
Methods
Subjects and study design
The present prospective cohort study was
nested in a randomized trial (registered with
ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00629629)
carried out in the city of São Leopoldo, Brazil
(approximate population: 200,000 inhabit-
ants) to investigate the effectiveness of nutri-
tional advice on breastfeeding and healthy
weaning17 based on the recommendations of
the World Health Organization. Five hundred
mothers were recruited from the maternity
clinic of the only publicly funded hospital in
the city, which mainly serves the low-income
population. The overall project also investi-
gated risk factors for general and oral out-
comes.
A sample size of 300 four-year-old children
was calculated in the larger study to detect a
difference of 35% in the occurrence of dental
caries between the intervention and control
groups18. This sample size was compatible
with the size required to estimate the associa-
tion between TDI and family structure at
4 years of age (n = 296) employing a 95%
confidence level, 80% statistical power, and
prevalence rates 24% and 11% for TDI
among exposed and non-exposed individuals,
respectively11.
Mothers who gave birth to a single child at
full term (≥37 weeks) with normal birth
weight (≥2500 g) and who had no impedi-
ment to breastfeeding (HIV/AIDS) were
invited to take part in the larger study until
the required sample size for the cohort was
reached. After being informed of the research
procedures, 90% of mothers agreed to partici-
pate. The potential risk factors (demographic,
socioeconomic, and behavioral variables)
were collected through interviews and
anthropometric measures. The outcome (TDI)
was determined through a clinical dental
examination at 4 years of age.
Six-month evaluation – demographic and socioeco-
nomic data collection. When the children were
6 months of age, trained fieldworkers held
face-to-face structured interviews with the
mothers. The questionnaire was previously
tested in a pilot study involving 16 mothers
of children aged 12 months attending primary
care services. The following demographic and
socioeconomic variables were investigated:
child’s gender, mother’s schooling (number of
years of study), monthly household income
per capita, mother’s occupation status, family
structure, and number of residents in the
home. Family structure was considered
nuclear (child living with mother and father)
or non-nuclear (child not living with both
parents). Household income per capita was
calculated by dividing the monthly income of
the family by the current Brazilian minimum
monthly wage at the time of the study
(approximately US $100).
Twelve-month evaluation – anthropometric, behav-
ioral, and clinical data collection. When the
children had completed 12 months of life,
dietary behavior was assessed at a municipal
health center using structured interviews
addressing the onset, duration, and frequency
of feeding practices in the previous 6 months.
For this study, total duration of breastfeeding
and number of bottle feedings per day at
12 months of age were analyzed. Parents
were also asked whether the child had used a
pacifier in the first year of life. Anthropomet-
ric variables (weight and height) were col-
lected by trained students from the nutrition
department using standardized methods for
the calculation of weight for age, height for
age, and body mass index (BMI), which were
subsequently categorized in tertiles. A clinical
dental examination was also performed at the
health center by a single experienced pediat-
ric dentist for the determination of the num-
ber of erupted teeth and the occurrence of
early childhood caries (ECC). The dental
examination was conducted with the child
lying on a stretcher and with the aid of a
mouth mirror. The teeth were previously
brushed and dried with gauze. ECC was
assessed based on case definitions of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH)19: the
presence of one or more decayed (d1+), miss-
ing, or filled tooth surfaces in any primary
tooth (d1+mfs ≥ 1). Intra-examiner reproduc-
ibility was previously assessed with 35 chil-
dren aged 10–18 months in two dental
Risk factors of dental trauma in childhood 235
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
examinations spaced 10 days apart (kappa
score = 0.88).
Four-year evaluation – anthropometric, behav-
ioral, and clinical data collection. Between 48
and 53 months of age, the children were
again submitted to the anthropometric evalu-
ation using the same procedures as those
employed at twelve months of age, with the
calculation of weight for age, height for age,
and BMI, subsequently categorized in tertiles.
On the same day as the anthropometric
examinations, the mothers were interviewed
for the collection of behavioral data on
whether the child practiced regular physical
activity during the week (soccer, ballet, swim-
ming, judo, etc.), the mean number of hours
the child spent watching television per day
and whether the child attended a daycare
center (at least one shift per day).
Dental examinations were conducted at a
municipal health center at the 4-year evalua-
tion by the same pediatric dentist who per-
formed the 12-month assessment. The
examiner was blinded to the children’s base-
line variables. The teeth were inspected with
the aid of a mouth mirror, with the child
seated in an ordinary chair. ECC was
assessed following the same criterion used at
the 12-month assessment19. TDI was
recorded based on the descriptions proposed
by Andreasen20: crown discoloration, enamel
fracture, enamel/dentin fracture with or
without pulp exposure, subluxation, lateral
luxation, extrusive luxation, intrusive luxa-
tion, and avulsion. Because none of the chil-
dren were affected at the outset of the
cohort, the frequency of children presenting
TDI at the 4-year evaluation represented the
cumulative incidence in the first 4 years of
life, defined as the proportion of a fixed pop-
ulation that becomes affected with a particu-
lar health condition within a given period of
time6.
Intra-examiner reliability regarding the
diagnosis of TDI and ECC was previously
assessed in two dental examinations con-
ducted 14 days apart involving 20 children
aged three to 5 years. The mean Kappa index
for intra-examiner agreement was 0.94 for
TDI and 0.90 for ECC.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the
PASW program version 17.0. Unadjusted and
adjusted relative risks of exhibiting TDI were
estimated using Poisson regression models
with robust variance. The multivariable
model followed a hierarchical approach21
from distal to proximal determinants per-
formed on three levels: (i) demographic and
socioeconomic variables; (ii) anthropometric
and behavioral variables at 12 months; (iii)
anthropometric and behavioral variables at
4 years; (iv) and TDI. The backward stepwise
procedure was used to select covariates on
each level. Therefore, the final model esti-
mates relative risks of the selected variables
after adjusting for variables on the same level
or higher levels. A hierarchical approach pre-
vents distal factors from being improperly
adjusted for proximal factors, with a conse-
quent reduction in or elimination of the
effects of the former21. Explanatory variables
with a P-value < 0.15 in the adjusted assess-
ment of risk factors were maintained in the
final regression model. Interactions between
risk factors in the final model were tested
using the Wald test for heterogeneity. An
additional analysis was performed to investi-
gate the possibility that the occurrence of
ECC may have confounded the reported asso-
ciations. Figure 1 summarizes the theoretical
model adopted in this study. Comparisons of
baseline variables (weight and length at birth,
mother’s schooling, and household income)
between children who were lost to follow-up
and those who remained in the cohort were
performed using the chi-squared test and
t-test for independent samples. A two-tailed
P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Ethical considerations
This study received approval from the
Human Research Ethics Committee of the
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (Bra-
zil). The procedures, possible discomfort, and
possible benefits of the study were fully
explained to parents, and informed consent
was obtained prior to the investigation.
236 C. A. Feldens et al.
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Children with TDI or caries requiring
professional intervention were referred for
treatment at the Pediatric Dental Clinic of
the Lutheran University of Brazil. At the 12-
month and 4-year evaluations, all children
underwent nutritional and development
assessments. Children with anemia, over-
weight, wasting syndrome, stunting, or
developmental problems were referred to
their primary care pediatricians for further
assessment and treatment.
Results
Dental examinations were carried out on
68% (340/500) of the children recruited at
birth. The following were the reasons for
losses between birth and the 4-year evalua-
tion: family moved to another city (n = 67),
refusal to participate (n = 45), address not
found (n = 41), infant given up for adoption
(n = 1), genetic disease (n = 2), death of child
(n = 2), severe illness of mother (n = 1), and
death of mother (n = 1). Three children were
excluded from the analysis of TDI at 4 years
of age due to crown destruction or tooth loss
stemming from dental caries, resulting in a
final sample of 337 children.
Age at the time of examination ranged from
48 to 53 months (mean: 50.5 months; stan-
dard deviation: 1.7 months). The male gender
accounted for 57.0% of the sample. Mother’s
schooling ranged from 1 to 13 years; 71.5%
of mothers had eight or fewer years of formal
education. Nearly 85% of the families earned
an income per capita below the national mini-
mum wage. At 12 months of age, most chil-
dren had more than six teeth and were bottle
fed once to twice per day; half of the children
used a pacifier. At 4 years of age, a great vari-
ation in height was observed, ranging from
92.0 to 117.2 cm (mean 103.1 cm); only 1/5
of the children attended preschool and only
7.3% performed regular physical activity; the
time spent watching television ranged from 0
to 13 h per day (mean: 2.4 h; standard devia-
tion: 2.1 h) (Table 1).
A total of 23.7% (80/337) of the children
exhibited TDI at 4 years of age; 65 of whom
had only one tooth affected, 13 had two teeth
affected, and two had more than two teeth
affected. In the overall sample, 98 teeth had
suffered TDI. Maxillary central incisors were
the most frequently affected by TDI (85.7%),
followed by maxillary lateral incisors
(10.2%), and mandibular central incisors
(4.1%). The most common type of injury was
enamel fracture (n = 44; 44.9%), followed by
crown discoloration (n = 34; 34.7%), and
enamel/dentin fracture (n = 11; 11.2%). The
other types of TDI encountered were lateral
luxation (n = 4), avulsion (n = 4), and intru-
sive luxation (n = 1).
The unadjusted model (Table 2) demon-
strates that the frequency of TDI was signifi-
cantly greater among children whose families
had a higher household income, those with a
shorter period of breastfeeding in the first
year of life, and those who bottle fed more
often at 12 months. A greater height for age
at 12 months and 4 years was also associated
with the occurrence of TDI.
The multivariable analysis (Table 3) demon-
strated that the risk of TDI was significantly
greater among children whose families had a
higher household income and those with a
greater number of teeth erupted at 12 months
of age. Children having been breastfed for at
least 6 months had a 35% lower risk of TDI
at 4 years of age, whereas bottle feeding three
or more times a day at 12 months of age was
associated with a greater than twofold
increased risk of TDI at 4 years of age. More-
over, children with a greater height for age at
Demographic variablesSex
Family structureNumber of residents in home
Socioeconomic variablesMother’s schooling
Mother’s work statusIncome per capita
Anthropometric variables(12 months)
Weight for ageHeight for age
Body mass indexNumber of teeth
Behavioral variables(12 months)
Breastfeeding durationNumber of bottles/day
Pacifier use
Anthropometric variables(4 years)
Weight for ageHeight for age
Body mass index
Behavioral variables(4 years)
Daycare attendanceWeekly physical activityHours watching TV/day
Traumatic dental injuries
Figure 1. Conceptual hierarchical framework for traumatic
dental injuries (TDI).
Risk factors of dental trauma in childhood 237
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
4 years had an 80% greater risk of TDI. No
interactions were found among the variables
in the final model. The adjusted relative risks
of TDI were virtually unchanged after adjust-
ing for ECC at 1 year of age: income ≥ 1
BMW (1.66, 95% CI: 1.08–2.55; P = 0.021),
total breastfeeding duration ≥6 months (0.65,
95% CI 0.43-0.97; P = 0.035), and number of
bottles/day at 12 months ≥ 3 (2.37, 95% CI
1.10-5.10, P = 0.027). The relative risk and
P-value remained the same for the 3rd tertile
of height for age. Similarly, no significant
change in the estimates was observed after
adjustment for ECC at 4 years of age.
No difference was found between the chil-
dren lost to follow-up and those who remained
in the cohort at 4 years of age regarding poten-
tial risk factors for childhood outcomes: weight
at birth (P = 0.871), length at birth
(P = 0.122), mother’s schooling (P = 0.423),
and household income (P = 0.477).
Discussion
This is the first cohort study to investigate risk
factors associated with TDI in the first 4 years
of life based on socioeconomic, anthropo-
metric, and behavioral variables. Approxi-
mately 25% of the children had clinical signs
of TDI, demonstrating the high frequency of
this outcome in the early years of life. Most
studies investigating the prevalence of TDI in
different populations report rates ranging
from 20 to 40% among preschoolers7–9,22,23.
Differences in the distribution of potential risk
factors in different communities may lead to
divergent degrees of susceptibility. Moreover,
the variation in the prevalence of TDI among
children and adolescents has been attributed
to the different diagnostic criteria and exami-
nation methods employed12,24,25.
Previous studies found that breastfeeding
and non-nutritive sucking habits were associ-
ated with malocclusion8,26,27, whereas accen-
tuated overjet and open bite were associated
with the occurrence of TDI7,9,10. No previous
longitudinal study has, however, investigated
the relationship of early feeding practices and
non-nutritive sucking habits with TDI in the
primary dentition. In the present investiga-
tion, breastfeeding for 6 months or more was
a protection factor and a high frequency of
bottle feeding at 12 months of age was a risk
factor for the occurrence of TDI. Moreover,
these findings remained significant even after
controlling for confounding factors and the
adjustment of the final model, indicating an
independent effect on the occurrence of the
outcome.
It is plausible that both breastfeeding
and non-nutritive sucking habits exert an
influence on the facial pattern of children,
Table 1. Demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioralcharacteristics of sampled children.
Variables n (%)
GenderMale 192 (57.0)Female 145 (43.0)
Mother’s schooling≤4 years 66 (19.6)5–8 years 175 (51.9)>8 years 96 (28.5)
Income per capita<1 BMW 277 (84.7)≥BMW 50 (15.3)
Mother’s work status (child aged 6 months)Yes 115 (37.1)No 195 (62.9)
Family structureNuclear 236 (70.4)Non-nuclear 99 (29.6)
Number of residents in home<4 87 (26.0)4–5 180 (53.7)>5 68 (20.3)
Number of teeth at 12 months≤6 136 (40.6)>6 199 (59.4)
Total breastfeeding duration<6 months 125 (37.3)≥6 months 210 (62.7)
Number of bottles/day at 12 monthsNone 85 (25.2)1–2 201 (59.6)≥3 51 (15.2)
Pacifier use at 12 monthsNo 167 (49.7)Yes 169 (50.3)
Daycare attendanceYes 62 (18.6)No 272 (81.4)
Weekly physical activity at 4 yearsYes 24 (7.3)No 307 (92.7)
Hour watching TV/day at 4 years<2 141 (43.0)2–4 129 (39.3)>4 58 (17.7)
*1 BMW = Brazilian monthly minimum wage (R$ 180 or US$ 80).
238 C. A. Feldens et al.
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Table 2. Unadjusted relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of exhibiting traumatic dental injuries (TDI) at4 years of age.
Variables NWith TDI
P* RR (95% CI) Pn (%)
Socio-demographic variables in first year of lifeGenderMale 192 52 (27.1) 0.097 1.40 (0.94–2.10) 0.102Female 145 28 (19.3) 1.00
Family structureNuclear 236 56 (23.7) 0.920 0.98 (0.64–1.48) 0.979Non-nuclear 99 24 (24.2) 1.00
Number of residents in home<4 87 18 (20.7) 0.504 1.004–5 180 45 (25.0) 1.21 (0.74–1.96) 0.443>5 68 17 (25.0) 1.21 (0.67–2.16) 0.524
Mother’s schooling (years)≤4 66 10 (15.2) 0.143 1.005–8 175 45 (25.7) 1.70 (0.91–3.17) 0.097>8 96 25 (26.0) 1.72 (0.89–3.33) 0.109
Mother’s work statusYes 115 31 (27.0) 0.443 1.17 (0.79–1.73) 0.441No 195 45 (23.1) 1.00
Income per capita<1 BMW 277 60 (21.7) 0.029 1.00≥BMW 50 18 (36.0) 1.66 (1.08–2.56) 0.021
Anthropometric and behavioral variables at 12 months of ageWeight for age (at 12 months)1st tertile 111 22 (19.8) 0.209 1.002nd tertile 112 28 (25.0) 1.26 (0.77–2.06) 0.3563rd tertile 111 30 (27.0) 1.36 (0.84–2.21) 0.208
Height for age (at 12 months)1st tertile 111 19 (17.1) 0.017 1.002nd tertile 110 26 (23.6) 1.38 (0.81–2.34) 0.2323rd tertile 114 35 (30.7) 1.79 (1.10–2.94) 0.020
BMI (at 12 months)1st tertile 112 28 (25.0) 0.940 1.002nd tertile 112 24 (21.4) 0.86 (0.53–1.38) 0.8573rd tertile 110 28 (25.5) 1.02 (0.65–1.60) 0.938
Number of teeth at 12 months≤6 136 22 (16.2) 0.006 1.00>6 199 58 (29.1) 1.80 (1.16–2.80) 0.009
Total breastfeeding duration<6 months 125 43 (34.4) 0.001 1.00≥6 months 210 37 (17.6) 0.51 (0.35–0.75) 0.001
Number of bottles/day at 12 monthsNone 85 9 (10.6) 0.001 1.001–2 201 54 (26.9) 2.54 (1.31–4.91) 0.006≥3 51 17 (33.3) 3.15 (1.52–6.53) 0.002
Pacifier use at 12 monthsNo 167 39 (23.4) 0.845 1.00Yes 169 41 (24.3) 1.04 (0.71–1.52) 0.845
Anthropometric and behavioral variables at 4 yearsWeight for age (4 years)1st tertile 111 22 (19.8) 0.222 1.002nd tertile 111 27 (24.3) 1.23 (0.75–2.02) 0.4203rd tertile 112 30 (26.8) 1.35 (0.83–2.19) 0.222
Height for age (4 years)1st tertile 112 16 (14.3) 0.002 1.002nd tertile 110 27 (24.5) 1.72 (0.98–3.01) 0.0583rd tertile 112 36 (32.1) 2.25 (1.33–3.81) 0.003
(Continued)
Risk factors of dental trauma in childhood 239
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
especially anterior open bite and maxillary
overjet8, making them more or less susceptible
to TDI. Clarification regarding the network
of associations involving feeding practices,
non-nutritive sucking habits, and TDI can
contribute to the development of prevention
strategies directed at preschoolers. In this pop-
ulation, pacifier use and bottle feeding in the
first month of life have been associated with a
shorter period of breastfeeding28. Moreover,
advising new mothers about breastfeeding
is reported to reduce pacifier use in the first
year of life and other outcomes29, which
demonstrates the feasibility of this type of
intervention.
Associations between TDI and anthropo-
metric variables have been increasingly inves-
tigated in recent years. A number of studies
suggest that obesity is a risk factor for TDI in
both schoolchildren24,30 and preschoolers15.
In this study, TDI was more frequent among
children in the highest tertile for height for
age at 4 years, and this finding has no obvi-
ous explanation. It is plausible that a child’s
height may be related to deficits in balance
and muscle strength, which are two impor-
tant intrinsic risk factors for falls and injuries
that were not evaluated in this study31. A
systematic review found that the height of a
fall is a major risk factor for the incidence
and severity of injuries in children32. In a
study involving American children, each one-
unit increase in fall height increased the risk
of injury by a factor of 2.333. In this study,
the considerable variation in height among
the children may have contributed to the
results. It is also possible that taller children
are more exposed to activities of greater risk.
The frequency of TDI in the three categories
of height for age indicates some degree of a
dose–response effect, with little chance that
Table 2 (Contd.)
Variables NWith TDI
P* RR (95% CI) Pn (%)
BMI (4 years)1st tertile 111 27 (24.3) 0.483 1.002nd tertile 110 29 (26.4) 1.08 (0.69–1.71) 0.7283rd tertile 113 23 (20.4) 0.84 (0.51–1.37) 0.477
Daycare attendanceYes 62 15 (24.2) 0.862 1.04 (0.64–1.71)No 272 63 (23.2) 1.00 0.862
Weekly physical activityYes 24 8 (33.3) 0.225 1.48 (0.81–2.71)No 307 69 (22.5) 1.00 0.200
Hours watching TV/day<2 141 31 (22.0) 0.661 0.91 (0.52–1.58) 0.7402–4 129 32 (24.8) 1.03 (0.59–1.77) 0.922>4 58 14 (24.1) 1.00
BMW, Brazilian monthly minimum wage.*Chi-squared test.
Table 3. Final multivariable model: adjusted relative risks(RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of exhibitingtraumatic dental injuries at 4 years of age.
Variables RR (95% CI) P
GenderMale 1.39 (0.93–2.08) 0.111Female 1.00
Income per capita<1 BMW 1.00≥1 BMW 1.66 (1.08–2.56) 0.021
Number of teeth at 12 months≤6 1.00>6 1.74 (1.13–2.67) 0.011
Total breastfeeding duration<6 months 1.00≥6 months 0.65 (0.43–0.97) 0.034
Number of bottles/day at 12 monthsNone 1.001–2 1.79 (0.90–3.57) 0.099≥3 2.37 (1.10–5.11) 0.027
Height for age at 4 years1st tertile 1.002nd tertile 1.47 (0.83–2.60) 0.1863rd tertile 1.79 (1.03–3.11) 0.039
BMW, Brazilian monthly minimum wage.
240 C. A. Feldens et al.
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
the association was found by chance. The
inclusion of anthropometric variables in mul-
tivariable models in future studies investigat-
ing the causality of TDI in children could
contribute to the clarification of this issue.
The observation that behavioral variables at
4 years of age, such as frequency of attending
a daycare center, practice of physical activity,
and number of hours spent watching televi-
sion, were not associated with the outcome
does not necessarily mean that these forms of
behavior exert no influence on the occur-
rence of TDI. Because these variables were
collected at 4 years of age, it is plausible that
the time in which the children were exposed
was much lower in comparison with the
behavioral variables collected in the first year
of life. Studies involving schoolchildren indi-
cate that a significant number of cases of TDI
occur in and around schools, with little or no
interference from teachers with regard to
either prevention or immediate care28,29. In
contrast, the characteristics of activities devel-
oped in the preschool phase and the greater
monitoring of supervisors at daycare centers
may have contributed toward a similar fre-
quency of TDI among children attending day-
care centers at 4 years of age. Moreover, the
low frequency of children who practiced
physical activity may also account for the lack
of an association with the outcome. This
notion is supported by the difference in the
frequency of TDI between children who prac-
ticed physical activities (33.3%) and those
who did not practice such activities (22.5%).
As the associations between TDI and these
forms of behavior in early childhood are
examined for the first time in this study, simi-
lar investigations should be carried out in
populations with different characteristics.
Conflicting findings are reported regarding
the influence of socioeconomic factors on the
occurrence of TDI in different populations.
Although a number of studies report higher
rates of TDI among children with a lower
socioeconomic status12,13,34, other investigations
report an association with a higher socioeco-
nomic status10,14,15, which is in line with the
present findings. This divergence may be par-
tially explained by the use of different socio-
economic indicators. Family income, social
class, parents’ level of education, parents’
occupation, and type of school measure dif-
ferent aspects and have different meanings in
different communities, which may affect the
findings and conclusions35. Moreover, it is
possible that socioeconomic status exerts an
influence in different ways, depending on
cultural aspects and issues related to access to
safe environments, protective equipment for
the avoidance of TDI, and healthcare services
in each country. It has been suggested that
the greater occurrence of TDI among children
with a higher socioeconomic status in devel-
oping countries (as in the present case) is due
to the greater exposure of such children to
situations of risk without the existence of safe
environments1,10,14.
This study has limitations that should be
addressed. Firstly, a considerable number of
children were lost to follow-up, which is a
common problem in cohort studies, mainly in
populations with a high degree of mobility.
To minimize this problem, identification data
were collected in detail by the researchers at
the outset of the study. Selection bias,
however, is unlikely to be a major problem,
considering the similarity in baseline charac-
teristics between those lost to follow-up and
those who remained in the cohort. Secondly,
the lack of assessment of TDI at different ages
may have led to the misclassification of the
outcome, especially luxation, which can heal
and may not be detected in a subsequent
evaluation. Although some lesions may have
received restorative treatment and hindered
the diagnosis at 4 years of age, this is not
believed to have distorted the results, as a
very small number of children had visited the
dentist and the filled component represented
only 2.3% of the dmft �ındex17. Thirdly,
malocclusion was not collected in this
investigation. The inclusion of overjet in the
analysis, however, would possibly not have
altered the findings, as this variable would
serve as a mediator between the observed
behavior and outcome, which is a condition
that a confounding variable cannot conceptu-
ally assume6. Even if overjet mediates the
relationship between associated behaviors and
TDI, it seems much more advisable to concen-
trate efforts on the encouragement of ade-
Risk factors of dental trauma in childhood 241
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
quate breastfeeding and a reduction in bottle
feeding than the use of orthodontic appli-
ances for the correction of malocclusion at
this age.
In conclusion, a shorter breastfeeding period
and high frequency of bottle feeding in the
first year of life are risk factors for the occur-
rence of TDI in early childhood. With regard
to the implications for clinical practice, man-
agement, and public policies, advising mothers
about early feeding practices should be consid-
ered in the development and implementation
of prevention strategies directed at caries,
malocclusion, and TDI in childhood. This
represents a common risk approach, which
appears to be the most effective strategy for
disease prevention36. A higher socioeconomic
status and greater height for age were also
associated with the outcome and should be
investigated in depth in further studies.
Why this paper is important to pediatric dentists
● There are few cohort studies concerning TDI in pri-
mary dentition
● This paper provides information about behavioral,
socioeconomic, and anthropometric risk factors for
the occurrence of TDI in preschool children.
● These findings can help pediatric dentists in clinical
practice, contributing to the advising of parents and
elaboration of prevention strategies of TDI at the pop-
ulation level.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they do not have
any conflict of interest.
References
1 Aldrigui JM, Abanto J, Carvalho TS et al. Impact of
traumatic dental injuries and malocclusions on qual-
ity of life of young children. Health Qual Life Out-
comes 2011; 9: 78.
2 Traebert J, Lacerda JT, Foster Page LA, Thomson
WM, Bortoluzzi MC. Impact of traumatic dental
injuries on the quality of life of schoolchildren. Dent
Traumatol 2012; 28: 423–428.3 Porritt JM, Rodd HD, Baker SR. Parental qual-
ity-of-life impacts following children’s dento-alveolar
trauma. Dent Traumatol 2013; 29: 92–98.4 Kramer PF, Feldens CA, Helena Ferreira S, Bervian
J, Rodrigues PH, Peres MA. Exploring the impact of
oral diseases and disorders on quality of life of
preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
2013; 41: 327–335.5 Dam�e-Teixeira N, Alves LS, Ardenghi TM, Susin C,
Maltz M. Traumatic dental injury with treatment
needs negatively affects the quality of life of Brazilian
schoolchildren. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013; 23: 266–273.6 Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology,
2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, 1998.
7 Bonini GC, B€onecker M, Braga MM, Mendes FM.
Combined effect of anterior malocclusion and inade-
quate lip coverage on dental trauma in primary
teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28: 437–440.8 Norton E, O’Connell AC. Traumatic dental injuries
and their association with malocclusion in the pri-
mary dentition of Irish children. Dent Traumatol
2012; 28: 81–86.9 Piovesan C, Guedes RS, Casagrande L, Ardenghi TM.
Socioeconomic and clinical factors associated with
traumatic dental injuries in Brazilian preschool
children. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 464–470.10 Feldens CA, Kramer PF, Ferreira SH, Spiguel MH,
Marquezan M. Exploring factors associated with
traumatic dental injuries in preschool children: a
Poisson regression analysis. Dent Traumatol 2010; 26:
143–148.11 Watt RG. Strategies and approaches in oral disease
prevention and health promotion. Bull World Health
Organ 2005; 83: 711–718.12 Dam�e-Teixeira N, Alves LS, Susin C, Maltz M. Trau-
matic dental injury among 12-year-old South Brazil-
ian schoolchildren: prevalence, severity, and risk
indicators. Dent Traumatol 2013; 29: 52–58.13 Marcenes W, Murray S. Changes in prevalence and
treatment need for traumatic dental injuries among
14-year-old children in Newham, London: a deprived
area. Community Dent Health 2002; 19: 104–108.14 Cortes MIS, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. Prevalence
and correlates of traumatic injuries to the perma-
nent teeth of school-children aged 9-14 years in
Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Dent Traumatol 2001; 17:
22–26.15 Granville-Garcia AF, de Menezes VA, de Lira PI.
Dental trauma and associated factors in Brazilian
preschoolers. Dent Traumatol 2006; 22: 318–322.16 Spinks A, Turner C, McClure R, Nixon J. Commu-
nity based prevention programs targeting all injuries
for children. Inj Prev 2004; 10: 180–185.17 Feldens CA, Giugliani ERJ, Duncan BB, Drachler
ML, V�ıtolo MR. Long-term effectiveness of a nutri-
tional program in reducing early childhood caries: a
randomized trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
2010; 38: 324–332.18 Feldens CA, Kramer PF, Vidal SG, Faraco Junior IM,
V�ıtolo MR. Traumatic dental injuries in the first year
of life and associated factors in Brazilian infants.
J Dent Child 2008; 75: 7–13.19 Drury TF, Horowitz AM, Ismail AI, Maertens MP,
Rozier RG, Selwitz RH. Diagnosing and reporting
early childhood caries for research purposes. A
242 C. A. Feldens et al.
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
report of a workshop sponsored by the National
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the
Health Resources and Services Administration, and
the Health Care Financing Administration. J Public
Health Dent 1999; 59: 192–197.20 Glendor U, Marcenes W, Andreasen JO. Classifica-
tion, epidemiology and etiology. In: Andreasen JO,
Andreasen FM, Andersson L (eds). Textbook and
Color Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth, 4th
edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007: 217–254.21 Victora CG, Huttly SR, Fuchs SC, Olinto MTA. The
role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological
analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol
1997; 26: 224–227.22 Kramer PF, Zembruski C, Ferreira SH, Feldens CA.
Traumatic dental injuries in Brazilian preschool chil-
dren. Dent Traumatol 2003; 19: 299–303.23 Wendt FP, Torriani DD, Assunc�ão MC et al.
Traumatic dental injuries in primary dentition:
epidemiological study among preschool children
in South Brazil. Dent Traumatol 2010; 26: 168–173.24 Soriano EP, Caldas Ade F Jr, Carvalho MVD, Amo-
rim-Filho HA. Prevalence and risk factors related to
traumatic dental injuries in Brazilian schoolchildren.
Dent Traumatol 2007; 23: 232–240.25 Bendo CB, Scarpelli AC, Vale MP, Ara�ujo Zarzar
PM. Correlation between socioeconomic indicators
and traumatic dental injuries: a qualitative critical
literature review. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 420–425.
26 Peres KG, Barros AJ, Peres MA, Victora CG. Effects
of breastfeeding and sucking habits on malocclusion
in a birth cohort study. Rev Saude Publica 2007; 41:
343–350.27 G�ois EG, Ribeiro-J�unior HC, Vale MP et al. Influence
of nonnutritive sucking habits, breathing pattern
and adenoid size on the development of malocclu-
sion. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 647–654.28 Feldens CA, Vitolo MR, Rauber F, Cruz LN, Hilgert
JB. Risk factors for discontinuing breastfeeding in
southern Brazil: a survival analysis. Matern Child
Health J 2012; 16: 1257–1265.29 Feldens CA, Ardenghi TM, Cruz LN, Cunha Scalco
GP, V�ıtolo MR. Advising mothers about breastfeed-
ing and weaning reduced pacifier use in the first
year of life: a randomized trial. Community Dent Oral
Epidemiol 2013; 41: 317–326.30 Nicolau B, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. The relation-
ship between traumatic dental injuries and adoles-
cents’ development along the life course. Community
Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 306.
31 Granacher U, Gollhofer A. Is there an association
between variables of postural control and strength
in prepubertal children? J Strength Cond Res 2012;
26: 210–216.32 Khambalia A, Joshi P, Brussoni M, Raina P, Mor-
rongiello B, Macarthur C. Risk factors for uninten-
tional injuries due to falls in children aged
0-6 years: a systematic review. Inj Prev 2006; 12:
378–381.33 Haney SB, Starling SP, Heisler KW, Okwara L. Char-
acteristics of falls and risk of injury in children
younger than 2 years. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010; 26:
914–918.34 Lalloo R. Risk factors for major injuries to the face
and teeth. Dent Traumatol 2003; 19: 12–14.35 Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S et al. Socioeco-
nomic status in health research: one size does not fit
all. JAMA 2005; 294: 2879–2888.36 Sheiham A, Watt RG. The common risk factor
approach: a rational basis for promoting oral health.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28: 399–406.
Risk factors of dental trauma in childhood 243
© 2013 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd