social return on investment (sroi) · pdf fileour responsibilities me guide you through the...
TRANSCRIPT
A STEP BY STEP GUIDE
7 Principles
6 Stages of SROI Process 1) Establishing Scope & Identifying Key Stakeholders
2) Mapping Outcomes
3) Evidencing Outcomes & Giving Them a Value
4) Establishing Impact a. Consulting Stakeholders
b. Developing Monitoring Tools
5) Calculating the SROI
6) Reporting, Using & Embedding
(A Guide to Social Return on Investment, Cabinet Office, 2009)
2
Kerry Traynor
HOW THE PROCESS WILL WORK
Monthly meetings
Focus on each stage of SROI
Workshop approach: presentation & discussion
Completion of SROI worksheet
You - in consultation with your stakeholders
Homework! Finishing off and checking
SROI analysis completed within 6 months
Use shared monitoring forms and keep data safe
3
Kerry Traynor
OUR RESPONSIBILITIES
Me Guide you through the process
Provide accurate and honest information
Source benchmarking data
SROI calculations
Develop final report
You Attend workshops or arrange catch-up
Think carefully, be honest and give as much detail as you can
Consult your stakeholders
Do your homework!
4
Kerry Traynor
7 PRINCIPLES OF SROI
Involve stakeholders
stages 2, 3 and 4 require stakeholder consultation
stakeholder-informed not stakeholder-led
Understand what changes
Value the things that matter
Only include what is material
Do not over-claim
Be transparent
Verify the result
5
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – ESTABLISHING SCOPE
1. Purpose
2. Audience
3. Background
4. Resources
5. Who will carry out the work?
6. The range of activities on which you will focus
7. The period of time to be considered
8. Type of analysis
6
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 1. PURPOSE
1. What is the purpose of this SROI analysis?
2. Why do you want to begin this process now?
3. Are there specific motivations driving the work, such as
strategic planning or funding requirements?
The purpose of this SROI analysis is to explore the social value
being created, both individually and collectively, by an emerging
network of creative and social organisations. A key aim of the
analysis is to explore the extent to which the network is
contributing to the proposed social change prioritised by the local
authority’s new strategic regeneration plan, A Vision for Sefton.
7
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 2. AUDIENCE
1. Who is this analysis for?
2. This should cover an initial assessment of how you will communicate with your audiences
This analysis is aimed at stakeholders interested in funding or otherwise supporting organisations within the network. It is also aimed at communicating the impact of the network to a broader audience including potential participants, partner organisations and other local organisations in the creative and social sectors.
Some stakeholders will be engaged in the analysis through consultation or through other means. On completion of the analysis, a range of key stakeholders will be invited to a launch event for the final report, and invited to comment. The final report will also be made available online and parts of it will be used to inform a variety of communications and funding bids.
8
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 3. BACKGROUND
1. Consider the aims and objectives of your organisation and how
it is trying to make a difference.
2. If you are focusing on specific activities you will need to
understand the objectives of those activities.
3. It is important that you have a clear understanding of what
your organisation does and what it hopes to achieve by its
activities.
The Creative Communities Consortium aims to … by …
[Your organisation] aims to … by …
9
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 4. RESOURCES
1. What resources, such as staff time or money, will be required?
2. Are these available?
Workshops: 8 hours (8 x 1hr workshops Jan – July 2013)
Homework: 8-16 hours (1-2 hrs per month)
Consultation: 4-6 hours
TOTAL: 20-30 hours
10
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 5. WHO WILL CARRY OUT THE
WORK?
1. Can you undertake the SROI analysis internally, or will you need to bring in external help?
2. Make sure you have the right mix of skills and support from the start.
3. Generally, you will need skills or experience in finance, accounting, evaluation and involving stakeholders.
An external associate will lead the analysis, guiding organisation/ project representatives through the process step-by-step. She has experience in the areas noted above, as well as in research and management in the creative and social sectors, and teaching in higher education in relevant subjects. External funding has been secured to cover costs. The network/associate also have access to a range of forums and support organisations providing information and advice on the SROI process.
11
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 6. RANGE OF ACTIVITIES
1. Will you be analysing all the activities of your organisation, or just specific ones?
2. You might want to separate the activities related to a particular source of funding, or those that are a priority for you.
3. Keep your scope small if this is your first SROI.
4. Clearly describe what you intend to measure. For example, if the activity is “our work with young people” this may cover several different projects or services. You may actually mean something more specific, like “mentoring support provided to young people”.
The aim is to analyse all of the KEY activities of member organisations. However it is recognised that this may not be feasible within the timescales and with the resources available within organisations. It is therefore recommended that members prioritise the projects/services you wish to include in the analysis and work through them one by one within the time you have available.
NB. Not including one or more projects will not necessarily have a negative impact on your final SROI calculation, since both the relevant inputs and outputs will be omitted from the final calculations.
12
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 7. PERIOD OF TIME
1. SROI is often annual
2. Often corresponds with financial accounting timescales
3. Can be specific to a project timescale
The analysis will cover ONE YEAR, corresponding with the
majority of members’ financial accounting timescales.
This means including all activities/projects/services that will take
place within that year, even if they do not run continuously
throughout the year.
13
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – 8. TYPE OF ANALYSIS
Type of analysis Evaluative
Conducted retrospectively
Based on actual outcomes that have already taken place
Can be challenging if correct data has not been collected
Forecast Predicts how much social value will be created if activities meet intended outcomes
Especially useful in planning stages
Help to show how investment can maximise impact
Useful for identifying what should be measured once project is up and running
Ensures that right data is collected to enable an evaluative SROI in the future
We will be undertaking a FORECAST analysis.
On completion of the first year, an EVALUATIVE analysis will be undertaken, comparing the forecast with actual outcomes.
14
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.1 – ADJUSTING THE SCOPE
Adjusting your scope in response to new information is good practice and is not unusual
You may wish to review your scope after considering the numbers and types of stakeholders you need to involve
This will determine the resource required and it may mean you need to start with fewer activities
We will revisit our scope at the relevant stage.
Please keep your scope in mind during the initial stages and make a note if you think you need to review your scope.
15
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.2 – IDENTIFYING STAKEHOLDERS
Stakeholders are identified as people, groups or organisations
that experience change as a result of your activities
Don’t hold back – identifying a stakeholder group here does
NOT mean you will have to engage or consult them all!
Now decide which stakeholders are most relevant to your
activity and should be included in your analysis
Make a note explaining your decisions for including or excluding
each stakeholder – we will need these at a later date
Now transfer the names of the stakeholder groups you have
chosen to include onto the SROI Impact Map – Stage 1
16
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 1.2 – IDENTIFYING CHANGES
Describe the key change(s) that each stakeholder group
experience
Changes may be positive or negative
Changes may be intentional or unintentional
Be descriptive, but succinct!
17
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2 – MAPPING OUTCOMES
2.1 Beginning your Impact Map
2.2 Identifying Inputs
2.3 Valuing Inputs
2.4 Clarifying outputs
2.5 Describing outcomes
Remember our themes:
Improving Health & Wellbeing
Improving Skills, Employability
Improving Organisations
Improving Physical Spaces
18
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2.1 – BEGIN YOUR IMPACT MAP
A different Impact Map for each key activity/service/project
Enter the following information at the top of the form:
Name of Organisation
Organisation Objectives
Activity
Activity Objective
Contract/Funding/Dept
Purpose of Analysis (this will always be Forecast)
Your Name
Date of Completion
19
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2.2 – IDENTIFYING INPUTS
Investment refers to the financial value of the inputs
Identify the contributions of stakeholders
ESSENTIAL to the delivery of the activity
Inputs are used up in the course of the activity
Mainly money, time or in-kind goods and services
Funders or customers might invest money
Volunteers or partners might invest time
Beware of double-counting inputs – eg. if you have a surplus
Do NOT include time contributed by beneficiaries
20
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2.3 – VALUING INPUTS
Create financial values for all inputs
Regardless of whether any money changes hands
Ensures transparency about the full cost of your activity
For volunteers – use a value equivalent to average hourly rate
for the type of work they are doing
For volunteers – can also include an allocation of overheads as
you might with an employed person eg. NI, desk space, IT etc.
Volunteering England has some useful information
21
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2.4 – CLARIFYING OUTPUTS
A quantitative summary of the work undertaken
50 people trained
25 children involved
6 artworks created
5 businesses created
May be several different outputs for each activity or each
stakeholder group
Outputs can be repeated for different stakeholder groups
22
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2.5 – DESCRIBING OUTCOMES
An outcome is what happens as a result of the output
50 people trained = 10 trainees get jobs
25 children involved = 20 children improve confidence and self esteem
6 artworks created = 6 playgrounds improved
5 businesses created = jobs created
Relate outcomes to the stakeholder group
Broad stakeholder groups might have broad outcomes
Eg. A govt funded project for refugees might list “better integration of refugees” as an outcome for the state
Use your judgement
23
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2.5 – DESCRIBING OUTCOMES
An outcome is what happens as a result of the output
50 people trained = 10 trainees get jobs
25 children involved = 20 children improve confidence and self esteem
6 artworks created = 6 playgrounds improved
5 businesses created = jobs created
Relate outcomes to the stakeholder group
Broad stakeholder groups might have broad outcomes
Eg. A govt funded project for refugees might list “better integration of refugees” as an outcome for the state
Use your judgement
24
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 2 – REVIEWING YOUR IMPACT MAP
This chain of events is often described as a theory of change
Make sure you have only included material outcomes
Check that you aren’t missing anything significant or including
something that is not relevant
Decide what you will finally include before you move on to the
next stage of measurement
If you decide to exclude any outcomes make a note of this and
your reasons – we will need this at a later stage
25
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3 – EVIDENCING OUTCOMES AND GIVING
THEM A VALUE
Recap previous session Remember outcomes should include numbers
3.1 Developing outcome indicators
3.2 Collecting outcomes data
3.3 Establishing how long outcomes last
3.4 Putting a value on outcome
Remember our themes: Improving Health & Wellbeing
Improving Skills, Employability
Improving Organisations
Improving Physical Spaces
26
Kerry Traynor
TOOLS – HEALTH & WELLBEING
Improving Health & Wellbeing
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale
Warwick Edinburgh Mental WellBeing
Scale (WEMWBS)
Outcomes Star Wellbeing
Outcomes Star Mental Health Recovery
Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation
(CORE) - 34-item questionnaire measuring
“a pan-theoretical core of clients' global
distress”, including subjective well-being,
commonly experienced problems or
symptoms, and life/social functioning”
27
Kerry Traynor
TOOLS – CHILDREN’S WELLBEING
Leuven Scale of Child Involvement – measures engagement in activity
UNICEF’s 2008 report Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries presents a new index of childhood well-being, constructed around six domains, one of which was subjective well-being (defined in terms of self-reported satisfaction with health, school and life overall).
The TellUs survey, developed and conducted by OfSted, is an extensive (13 page) self-report survey based around the five core dimensions of the ECM framework. It includes a question on happiness.
New Philanthropy Capital – Feelings Count – developed specifically for use in the charity sector for use with 11–16-year-olds. 41 questions incorporating 5 existing models. Seven core aspects of subjective well-being incl. self-esteem, resilience, emotional well-being, peer relationships, family relationships, satisfaction with school environment, and satisfaction with local community environment.
NEF/Action for Children developed a sample questionnaire for primary school aged children using a ladder to rate overall life satisfaction and smiley faces to rate 9 questions about emotional wellbeing, relationships and physical indicators of stress.
The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) is a 14-item instrument that was developed for NHS Health Scotland and (from 2008) is included in the core module of the annual Scottish Health Survey – now validated for use with 13-15-year-olds.
28
Kerry Traynor
TOOLS – SKILLS AND EMPLOYABILITY
Improving Skills & Employability
Outcomes Star Work – Triangle Consulting
Distance Travelled Guide – developed by ESF
Formula One – developed for Neighbourhood Learning Centres
The Personal Power Pack - developed by Gloucestershire Council Adult Education
The SOUL (Soft Outcomes Universal Learning) Project – developed by the Norfolk
voluntary and community sector
29
Kerry Traynor
TOOLS – IMPROVING ORGANISATIONS
Jobs created/safeguarded
Financial indicators -Turnover, ratio of public/private revenue, surplus, stability
PQASSO spider diagram
1. Planning
2. Governance
3. Leadership and management
4. User-centred service
5. Managing people
6. Learning and development
7. Managing money
8. Managing resources
9. Communications and promotion
10. Working with others
11. Monitoring and evaluation
12. Results
30
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.1 – DEVELOPING OUTCOME INDICATORS
An indicator is a way of finding out whether and how much change has happened
Create at least ONE indicator for each outcome
More indicators will strengthen (triangulate) your data
Balance between subjective/perceptions and objective/verifiable
Subjective and objective can both be self reported, but third party data would strengthen a case eg. For health improvements, subjective data might be participant perceptions of improvements to health or wellbeing. Objective data might be number of medical appointments/medication reduced.
Check they are measurable and within our means
Remember our themes: Improving Health & Wellbeing
Improving Skills, Employability
Improving Organisations
Improving Physical Spaces
31
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.2 – COLLECTING OUTCOMES DATA
Identify WHERE you can collect data on outcomes from
Maybe already available from internal or external sources Membership organisations, government departments, market research firms,
consulting companies, partner organisations etc.
Published research from universities, government departments or research organisations etc.
Maybe you need to collect new data from stakeholders Beneficiaries, project staff, partners etc.
Identify HOW you will collect the data
Bespoke monitoring forms
121 sessions / Interviews / focus groups
Questionnaires (face-to-face, telephone, post, email, internet)
From partner/third party agencies (data protection issues…)
32
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.2 – COLLECTING OUTCOMES DATA
WHO will you ask?
Total population or representative sample? What proportion?
Random, purposive, probabilistic or convenience
Use your judgement – choose a sample you feel is defensible and within budget
WHO will collect it?
Do you have (can you make) time?
Think about bias / power relationships - can you swap with colleagues?
Is there anybody external?
WHEN will you collect it?
Plan ahead
Start, middle and end
Every 2 weeks / 6 months / annually
Post-project tracking?
During existing contact or separately?
33
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.3 – ESTABLISHING HOW LONG
OUTCOMES LAST
Some outcomes last longer than others – maybe 1-5 years
Some depend on continuing intervention, some do not
If you believe the outcome will last beyond the activity, then it
will continue to generate value
Timescale usually number of years – the benefit period
Estimate the duration of each of your outcomes
Ideally you would ASK your beneficiaries
If this is not possible you can use other research to support
your estimate
Do not overstate your case and lose credibility
34
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.4 – PUTTING A VALUE ON THE OUTCOME
Create financial values for all outcomes
Monetisation of the outcome – assigning proxies
Proxies = approximations
All values are subjective – markets decide
Widely used in environmental and health economics – less so
in the creative and social sectors
35
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.4 – PUTTING A VALUE ON THE OUTCOME
Health & Wellbeing
Cost saving for NHS of GP clinic appointments
Cost saving for NHS of counselling services
Improving Skills & Employability - moving into employment creates:
Increased income to individual - net of tax
Reduced costs to government - benefits
Improving Organisations
More efficient organisations reduce need for public subsidy
New jobs create increased income for the government – employment taxes
Improving Physical Spaces
Increased land use
Reduced vandalism
36
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 3.4 – PUTTING A VALUE ON THE OUTCOME
Proxies that are more challenging..
Contingent valuation – asking people directly how they
value things
Revealed preference – inferring valuations from the prices
of market-related goods
Travel cost methods – translates inconvenience into money
eg. costs of someone travelling to access a service
Average household spending – on categories such as
leisure, health or home improvement – to see how much
people value these types of activity (see Family Spending
Survey)
37
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 4 – ESTABLISHING IMPACT
4.1 Deadweight and Displacement
4.2 Attribution
4.3 Drop-Off
4.4 Calculating your Impact
38
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 4.1 – DEADWEIGHT
DEADWEIGHT is a measure of the amount of outcome that would
have happened even IF THE ACTIVITY HAD NOT TAKEN PLACE.
Eg. a regeneration programme finds that there had been a 7%
increase in economic activity since the programme began. However
the national economy grew by 5% during that time. So you would
need to consider how much of the 7% was due to your intervention.
This will always be an estimate – don’t worry about “proving” your
estimate.
We may be able to access national datasets such as British Social
Attitudes Survey to get an idea of nationwide trends for comparison.
39
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 4.1 – DISPLACEMENT
DISPLACEMENT is an assessment of HOW MUCH OF YOUR
OUTCOME DISPLACED ANOTHER OUTCOME.
Does not apply in every SROI but must be aware.
Eg. crime being moved from one area to another.
Eg. an employed person moving from one job to another – as
they are displacing a potential outcome of moving somebody
out of unemployment and into employment.
40
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 4.2 – ATTRIBUTION
ATTRIBUTION is an assessment of HOW MUCH OF THE
OUTCOME WAS CAUSED BY THE CONTRIBUTION OF OTHER
PROJECTS OR SERVICES.
Eg. a new cycling scheme finds a significant decrease in carbon
emissions. However a congestion charge was also introduced
and an environmental awareness programme began, so you
have to ATTRIBUTE some of the outcome to their contribution.
41
Kerry Traynor
STAGE 4.3 – DROP-OFF
Remember in section 3 we considered how long we think each outcome will last…
DROP-OFF is an assessment of the REDUCTION IN THE INFLUENCE OF YOUR INTERVENTION IN A LONG TERM OUTCOME.
Only complete this for outcomes that last LONGER than ONE YEAR.
Eg. Your intervention is a training programme which helps unemployed people return to work. In the first year you could justify that your intervention played a very large part in helping them get a job, However if they are still employed after 2 or 3 years then that may be due more to their own commitment, development of on-the-job skills and networking.
You can use a standard approach eg. 50% drop in Y2, 20% in Y2, 20% in Y3, 10% in Y4.
Eg. an outcome of 100% that lasts for 3 years and drops off by 10% per year would be 100% in Y1, 90% in Y2 and 81% in Y3.
42
Kerry Traynor
NEXT STEPS
I will type up your Impact Maps to build in your work from today
I will email these to you ASAP with some suggestions for development
Before the next session please consider these comments and develop your map further if necessary
Please also give some thought to Stakeholder Consultation – we will plan this together in the next session but please think about which of your stakeholders:
Would be thoughtful and give a range of views – unexpected feedback is good!
Would be willing and able to comment on your analysis
Would be available during the time you have available
Think about past participants rather than current ones if possible
Consider asking funders, partners and non-users for their views
Remember you don’t have to meet them in person – an email/phone conversation is fine
Try to get a representative sample eg. cross age/gender/type
You don’t have to use/show the Impact Map if you don’t want to – think of other (creative!) ways of presenting and discussing the contents
44
Kerry Traynor