social network sites: an overview
DESCRIPTION
A short lecture I gave to an undergraduate HCI class to highlight research & findings on social network sites (SNSs).TRANSCRIPT
Social Network Sites: An OverviewUMBC IS-303: Fundamentals of Human-Computer Interaction
Jessica VitakMichigan State UniversityUniversity of [email protected] / @jvitak
SNSs: What are they?
boyd and Ellison (2007) define SNSs as “web-based services that allow individuals to:
(1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system;
(2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and
(3) view and traverse their list of connectionsand those made by others within the system.”
SNSs: Updated Definition
Ellison and boyd (in press): A social network site is a networked communication platform in which participants:
1) have uniquely identifiable profiles that consist of user-supplied content, content provided by other users, and system-level data;
2) can publicly articulate connections that can be viewed and traversed by others; and
3) can consume, produce, and interact with streams of user-generated content.
Who uses SNSs?
Sour
ce: M
adde
n &
Zic
khur
, 201
1. P
ew In
tern
et P
roje
ct.
v
SNS users are more likely to be:
• Women• Young
No statistically significant differences based on:
• Race• Income• Education• Geographic location
Source: Madden & Zickhur, 2011. Pew Internet Project.
What other SNSs exist besides Facebook?
Foreign-based SNSs (Cyworld, QQ)
Children’s SNSs (Club Penguin, Webkinz)
Demographic-specific SNSs (BlackPlanet)
SNSs for animals (Dogster, Catster)
Professional SNSs (LinkedIn)
And on… And on…
Why do people use SNSs?
Joinson (2008)“Looking at,” “Looking up” or “Keeping up with” People? Motives and Uses of Facebook
Social connection Shared identities Viewing/sharing photos Social investigation Social network surfing Status updating
Papacharissi & Mendelson (2011)Toward a New(er) Sociability: Uses, Gratifications and Social Capital on Facebook
Expressive info seeking Habitual pass time Relaxing entertainment Cool, new trend Companionship Professional achievement Escape Social interaction Meet new people
Why do people use SNSs?
What SNS users do: Broadcasting
What SNS users do: Commenting
What SNS users do: “Liking”
What SNS users do: Private Messages
Impression Management on SNSs
Impression Management: Sum of behaviors individuals engage in to either control or manipulate observers’ attributions of them
What are negative effects of using SNSs?
Facebook addiction?
Negative social outcomes Losing your job Getting caught in a lie Losing health benefits Underage drinking
Making us more narcissistic? More depressed? Lonelier? Increased fear of missing out (FOMO)?
* Take these with a grain of salt. Many are based on anecdotal rather than empirical evidence.
Benefits to Using SNSs
Social Capital: benefits derived from interactions with your social network
BondingBridging
Bridging Social Capital
Bonding Social Capital
Maintained Social Capital
* Source: Bernie Hogan
Research at MSU
Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe (2007) Intensity of Facebook use (FBI) predicts social capital
Steinfield, Ellison, & Lampe (2008) People with lower self-esteem benefit more from their use of
Facebook than those with higher self-esteem
Vitak, Ellison & Steinfield (2011) & Ellison, Vitak, Gray & Lampe (r&r) Engaging with your network is important
Research at MSU
Lampe et al. (2011): How do students use Facebook to collaborate on school work?
Positive Collaboration: Arrange group meeting Ask for help Manage group project
Negative Collaboration Sharing homework answers Sharing quiz/test answers
Research at MSU
Gray et al. (2012): Can Facebook improve college retention? Example: Inigral’s Schools application
College Friends on Facebook
Facebook Collaboration
Behaviors
Bonding Social
Capital
Social Adjustment to College
Persistence at College
+
+
+
+
Research at MSU
Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe (2011) Actual friends matter more than
total friends when it comes to perceptions of social capital
Total FB Friends
Actual Friends
Among undergrads: 25%Among MSU staff: 37%
Tong et al. (2008): When you have too many “friends” on a SNS, people rate you as less socially attractive
How
muc
h I l
ike
you
# of FB Friends
What does it mean to be a Facebook “Friend”?
Robin Dunbar claims you can only manage meaningful relationships with 150 people.
Dunbar: “Our minds are not designed to allow us to have more than a very limited number of people in our social world. The emotional and psychological investments that a close relationship requires are considerable, and the emotional capital we have available is limited.”
Facebook users have *a lot* of Friends
Vitak (2012): Most users reported having many Facebook Friends M = 500, Median = 433, SD =
361, range: 62 – 1600
And many were weak ties* 8% of network considered close
ties 52% of network considered very
weak ties
Weak Ties
3rd Tier
2nd TierSt
rong
Tie
s
* Measured using four of Aron et al.’s (1992) Inclusion of Other in Self items
Pew data: SNS users vs. non-users
How big is your social network? Average American: 634 ties Average Internet user (669)
vs. non-user (506) ties Average cell phone user:
664 ties Average SNS user: 636 ties
* Source: Hampton et al. (2011)
Public Displays of Connection*
On SNSs, links between two users are (sometimes): Mutual Public Unnuanced
Displaying connections can help someone else establish that you are who you say you are
* Donath & boyd (2004)
SNSs & Context Collapse
Selective Self-Presentation: We present different versions of the self depending on our audience
Context collapse occurs when we “perform” for different audiences at same time (e.g., weddings)
Ego
Context Collapse on Facebook
Impact of Context Collapse
Marwick & boyd (2011) Treat public space (Twitter) as if it were bounded
Vitak, Lampe, Gray, & Ellison (2012) Strategies for maintaining work/personal life boundary
Vitak (2012) Engaging with privacy features Increased disclosures Increased perceptions of social capital
ResourcesEllison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873-892.
Madden, M. & Zickhur, K. (2011). 65% of Online Adults Use Social Networking Sites, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington.
Tong, S.T, .Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J.B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531-549.
Stutzman, F., Vitak, J., Ellison, N., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2012). Privacy in interaction: Exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook. In Proceedings of the 6th annual International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
Vitak, J., Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Gray, R. (2012). “Why won’t you be my Facebook Friend?”: Strategies for dealing with context collapse in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual iConference (pp. 555-557). New York: ACM.
Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 329-347.
Gray, R., Vitak, J., Easton, E., & Ellison, N. (2012, May). Harnessing social technology in students’ transition to college: Facebook’s role in student adjustment and persistence. Paper presented at the International Communication Association 62nd Annual Conference, Phoenix.
Vitak, J. (2012, May). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Paper presented at the International Communication Association 62nd Annual Conference, Phoenix.