social media & democracy

18
SOCIAL MEDIA & DEMOCRACY CASE STUDY ON USHAHIDI IN AFGHANISTAN 1

Upload: frans-staal

Post on 17-May-2015

1.092 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Media & Democracy

1

SOCIAL MEDIA & DEMOCRACYCASE STUDY ON USHAHIDI IN AFGHANISTAN

Page 2: Social Media & Democracy

2

USHAHIDI

Ushahidi is a tool that is build for democratizing information, increasing transparency and lowering the barriers for individuals to share their stories.

First website created by a community of Kenyan bloggers, developed into a free software platform

Egypt

http://www.u-shahid.org/cr/

Afghanistan

http://www.fefa2010.com/

Page 3: Social Media & Democracy

3

USHAHIDI PLATFORM

Combines existing technology

• Open source software

• PHP (Kohana PHP5 framework)

• Built-in support for SMS gateways

• Clickatell for sending• FrontlineSMS for receiving

• Google Maps API for geocoding

Page 4: Social Media & Democracy

4

SMS REPORTING AND FEEDBACK CYCLE

Page 5: Social Media & Democracy

5

RESEARCH TOPICS• Ushahidi

• Theoretical propositions on

• IT system performance• Democracy• Media effects on society & democracy• Internet effects on society & democracy

• Influence of

• Societal factors• Design decisions• Deployment decisions

Page 6: Social Media & Democracy

6

SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEM

Socio-technical levels (Whitworth, 2009)

Page 7: Social Media & Democracy

7

WEB OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Web Of System Performance (Whitworth, 2009)

Page 8: Social Media & Democracy

8

WHAT IS A DEMOCRACY?

Dennis and Snyder (1997): “All democracies share certain important precepts – open debate with sufferance of unpopular opinions, and decisions taken by honest voting and thereupon accepted.”

Tocqueville, Democracy in America

• Importance of associations

• Importance of free press

• Third wave of democratization

1. Industrial revolution

2. Post WWII era

3. ICT revolution

Page 9: Social Media & Democracy

9

MEDIA SYSTEM DEPENDENCY THEORY

MSD theory (S. J. Ball-Rokeach & DeFleur, 1976)

Page 10: Social Media & Democracy

10

INFLUENCE ICT ON DEMOCRATIC GROWTH

Hypothetical Model for the influence of Communication Technologies and Endogenous Sociocultural Structures on Democratic Growth Based on Relationships Identified by MSD theory (Groshek, 2009)

Page 11: Social Media & Democracy

11

ALIVE IN AFGHANISTAN

Page 12: Social Media & Democracy

12

ALIVE IN AFGHANISTAN

Page 13: Social Media & Democracy

13

ALIVE IN AFGHANISTAN

Alive in Afghanistan

• Presidential elections of 2009

• Parliamentary elections of 2010

Afghanistan

• 42 % below national poverty line

• 18 % literacy rate (age >15)

• Important media: Radio and Mobile Telephony

Page 14: Social Media & Democracy

14

ALIVE IN AFGHANISTAN

Page 15: Social Media & Democracy

15

ALIVE IN AFGHANISTAN

Page 16: Social Media & Democracy

16

SOCIETAL FACTORS INFLUENCING SUCCESS• Level of Education

• Literacy• Digital literacy• Concepts of democracy, participation, etc.

• Location: Urban/Rural

• Wealth

• Age: Junior/Senior

• Trust in Government: Sociopolitical (in)stability, corruption

• Level of democracy

• Level of development

• Cultural factors: Religion, emancipation, importance of family

• Level of Communication Infrastructure

Page 17: Social Media & Democracy

17

DESIGN & DEPLOYMENT DECISIONS• Good Partnerships

• Marketing of the platform

• Creating alternative ways to interact

• ‘Social’ rules: Policies on crowdsourcing, privacy, community building, etc.

• Contingency planning

• Estimating feasibility of citizen-reporting

Page 18: Social Media & Democracy

18

FINAL THOUGHTS

Hypothetical Model for the influence of Communication Technologies and Endogenous Sociocultural Structures on Democratic Growth Based on Relationships Identified by MSD theory (Groshek, 2009)