Social Contract Theory

The ideas behind the Declaration of Independence and the

American Revolution

Journal Prompt What would your life be like without

government?– Consider services the government

provides – freedoms government limits– your safety, health, happiness and

property Would you like to live without

government? Why or why not?

Social Contract Theory is about

1. Why people theoretically choose to give up some of their power in order to form a government

2. The purpose of government

Who are the main social contract theorists?

Rousseau,Thomas Hobbes, & John Locke wrote about social contract theory in 1600s & 1700s.

John Locke’s ideas are the foundation of the Declaration of Independence

The Second Treatise on Government by John Locke

Written 1679-83

124-page PERSUASIVE ESSAY.

Why did he write it?

Purpose of Locke’s Second Treatise on Government

To explain the role or purposes of gov’t Justify resisting the power of the king To protect property rights and increase

Britain’s wealth. (Locke was a big land owner)

Social Contract theorists like John Locke based their ideas about government on

a fictitious “state of nature”

What is this state of nature?

What does “the state of nature” mean?

What life is “naturally” like before people created governments

Do we really know what this is? No. It is what different philosophers imagine life would be like without government.

What do you think the state of nature, or life without government would be like?

According to Locke, in the state of nature everyone

Is equal Has liberty Follows “natural laws of reason” -

– don’t harm others’ LIFE/HEALTHor – LIBERTY or – PROPERTY POSSESSIONS– Everyone has to preserve himself and others

Has executive power- everybody has the right to punish others for breaking these natural laws

Natural laws of the state of nature: don’t mess with someone’s

Life

Liberty

Property

The state of nature is dangerous!

If everybody has the right to punish people who break the natural laws then what is life like in the state of nature?

Violent! Chaotic!

Here’s how Thomas Hobbes’ described life in the state of nature,

or life w/o government

Life in the state of nature is essential a state of constant violence, a state of war. It is... “short,

nasty, and brutish”

If everyone has executive power to punish then

People who are selfish or revengeful or unfair will be extra lenient on their friends and hard on people they dislike when punishing people who break the natural laws

x

Trade State of Nature for Gov’t

State of nature can easily turn into a state of war, in which nobody’s life, liberty or property is safe. So…

Give up some liberties to leave the state of nature and form a civil society, to form a GOVERNMENT.

You give the GOVERNMENT your executive power to punish people who mess with your life, liberty or property.

The purpose of government according to John Locke is to

Protect people’s natural rights

LifeLiberty

Property

Definition of Political Power

“right of making laws and penalties for the regulating and preserving of property and of employing the force [power] of the community [to enforce those laws] and in the defense of the common-wealth from foreign injury; and all this for the public good.”

(Locke, 8)

Forming a government to protect yourself

from the violence of the state of nature

is called...

A social contract

Right to revolution

According to John Locke, people have a right to rebel or change the government when it no longer protects their LIFE, LIBERTY & PROPERTY.

This what the Founding Fathers used as the reason for declaring independence from England.

Right to revolution…

“… governments are dissolved from within when they fail to protect, life, liberty and property: contrary to their trust… by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it [the power] devolves [goes back to]the people, who have a right to… provide for their own safety and security, which is the end for which they are in society.”

“The [goal] of government is the good of mankind….

Which is best for mankind,A) that the people should be exposed to the boundless whim of tyranny?

B) that the rulers should sometimes be opposed, then they grow exorbitant in their use of power and employ it for the destruction, and not the preservation of the properties of their people? …people have a right to … erect a new [form of government]… as they think good.”

Should people revolt immediately or over little things?

“Great mistakes in the ruling part, many wrong and inconvenient laws, and all the slips of human frailty, will be born by the people without mutiny or murmur.

But, if a long train of abuses, prevarications [lies] and artifices… make the design visible to the people…. It is not to be wondered that they should then... endeavor to put the rule into such hands which may secure them the the ends for which government was at first erected.”

Compare John Locke’s ideas with the Declaration of

Independence

Life

Liberty

PropertyPursuit of

Happiness

Long train of abuses

Natural Rights of men

Dissolve government