social cohesion action plan of council of europe and spiral methodology the different possible ways...
TRANSCRIPT
Social Cohesion Action Plan of Council of Europe Social Cohesion Action Plan of Council of Europe and SPIRAL methodology and SPIRAL methodology
The different possible waysThe different possible ways
Division R&D Social Cohesion
Salaspils 2nd and 3rd February 2012
Conseil de l‘Europe – Council of Europe
2-Defining
the well-being/ill-being criteria
1- Setting up a coordination group
3- Using criteria to evaluate policies/social
interventions
8-reviewing/learningcapitalizing
6-Acting / implementing
7 – reevaluating (ex post)
5- deciding/ committing
4-Planning improvements and pilot actions (action plan preparation
CYCLE OF PROGRESS
CYCLE OF CONSULTATION
Common framework of local processes8 phases for progress in policies/action involving citizens /communities
Three ways for SPIRAL
1- Rapid way: using criteria of well-being at european levelpoverty reduction process
analyzing and improving impact of existing policies and actions
Action plan for fighting poverty through coresponsibility
2- Intermediary way: collecting criteria with citizens (HG)larger implication of citizens – larger scope of pilot actions of co-responsibility
possibility to improve global relevance of policies
Action plan to develop co-responsibility for well-being of all.
3- Deep way: building indicators of progress in well-beingDeep analyze of situation of people in terms of well-being
Possibility to develop individual and collective/ territorial projects of life
Project of Territory of Coresponsibility
Deep way
Deep way: Using criteria of ill-being/well-being to build indicators of progress in well-being of all.
Transversal scale of signification of progress indicators
Satisfactory situation but without
having achieved
the objective
of progress
5-Ideal
situation
4Good
situation
3- Medium situation
2Unsatisfa
ctory situation
1 Very
unsatisfactory
situation
Situation of risk of
degradation in chain and/or
irreversibility
The objective of progress is
achieved but without
guarantee of sustaina-
bility
The objective of progress is achieved
with guarantee of
sustaina-bility
No satisfactory
situation but without short term
risk
Rethinking how to measure
Transversal scale of signification of progress indicators
Satisfactory situation but without
having achieved
the objective
of progress
5-Ideal
situation
4Good
situation
3- Medium situation
2Unsatisfa
ctory situation
1 Very
unsatisfactory
situation
Situation of risk of
degradation in chain and/or
irreversibility
The objective of progress is
achieved but without
guarantee of sustaina-
bility
The objective of progress is achieved
with guarantee of
sustaina-bility
No satisfactory
situation but without short term
risk
Rethinking how to measure
Criteria of ill-being/well-being
Scale of values By combinaison of criteria
Duple Criteria (negative/positive
5- ideal
situation
4- Good situation
3- Medium Situation
2-Unsatis-factory
situation
Very unsatisfac-tory situation
Degrees
Validation by citizens
values
Elaboration of value for every degree
Building indicators of progress in WBA
Building indicators of progress in WBA
Table 427 – Indicators of progress in well-being – Example of employment
Scale of meaning 1 - Very unsatisfactory
2 – unsa-tisfactory 3 – Average 4 - Good 5 – Ideal
Range of values
Having no job or possibility of getting one
through lack of training and
unavailability of jobs of suitable
standard
Having no job but being
trained; jobs corresponding to the training
available
Having a job albeit
unrewarding and/or in an unpleasant atmosphere
and/or poorly remunerated
Having a rewarding job in
a pleasant atmosphere with
decent remuneration, but without a
permanent contract or not in a thriving enterprise
Having a rewarding job in a pleasant atmosphere with decent
remuneration, with a
permanent contract and in
a thriving enterprise
Examples of criteria
Being trained no yes yes yes yes
Jobs available no yes yes yes yes
Having a job no no yes yes yes
Rewarding job no no no yes yes
Pleasant atmosphere no no no yes yes
Decent remuneration no no no yes yes
Permanent contract no no no no yes
Thriving enterprise no no no no yes
Key: No = negative expression of the criterion; Yes = positive expression of the criterion.
2-Building indicators of
progress in well-being of all from the criteria and indicators of resources
1- Reinforcing the coordination group
3- Using indicators to evaluate the situation of
the inhabitants
8-reviewing/learningcapitalizing
6-Acting / implementing
7 – reevaluating (ex post)
5- deciding/ committing
4-Planning a Territorial project of co-responsibility for the well-being of all
CYCLE OF PROGRESS
CYCLE OF CONSULTATION
Second cycle of consultation and progress
4- How to develop social cohesion strategy and action
plan in Latvia and Estonia
1. The process began in Salaspils
2. From this experience and other interested towns, may be possible to have a group of pilot towns in Sweden as a basis for a bottom up approach at national level.
3. Council of Europe can give support to do so
Ideas to be discussed
Collaborative Website
https://spiral.cws.coe.int
1.Access to the concepts for a large public
2.Information on tools and methods for local processes
3.Specific space for networks
4.Specific space for working groups on relevant themes (human rights an poverty, creating jobs by reinforcing social links and social innovation in the public sphere, etc),
https://spiral.cws.coe.int
Thank you for your attention
https://spiral.cws.coe.int