social atlas 2010

8/7/2019 Social Atlas 2010

1/142

www.mkiobservatory.org.uk

www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/regeneration

Strategy & Regeneration

Social Atlas 2010


2/142

Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2009/10 1

CONTENTSForeword 2 Heelands 81

Executive Summary 3 Hodge Lea 82

Introduction 4 Kents Hill 83

Floor Targets 5 Kingsmead 84

Milton Keynes summary of trends 6 Lathbury 85

Borough Profile 8-22 Lavendon 86

Estates & Settlements 23 Leadenhall 87

Data definitions and methods 24-26 Little Brickhill 88

Estate level indicators 27 Loughton 89

Summary of indicators for estates 28-29 Loughton Lodge 90

Estate summary of trends 30-31 Medbourne 91

Ashland 32 Middleton/Milton Keynes Village 92

Astwood 33 Monkston 93

Bancroft 34 Monkston Park 94

Bancroft Park 35 Moulsoe 95

Beanhill 36 Neath Hill 96

Blakelands 37 Netherfield 97

Blue Bridge 38 New Bradwell 98

Bolbeck Park 39 Newport Pagnell 99

Bow Brickhill 40 Newton Blossomville 100

Bradville 41 North Crawley 101

Bradwell 42 Oakhill 102

Bradwell Common 43 Old Farm Park 103

Brickfields 44 Old Wolverton 104

Broughton & Atterbury 45 Oldbrook 105

Browns Wood 46 Olney 106

Caldecotte 47 Oxley Park 107

Calverton 48 Peartree Bridge 108

Campbell Park 49 Pennyland 109

Castlethorpe 50 Ravenstone 110

Central Bletchley 51 Shenley Brook End 111

Central Milton Keynes 52 Shenley Church End 112Chicheley 53 Shenley Lodge 113

Clifton Reynes 54 Sherington 114

Coffee Hall 55 Simpson 115

Cold Brayfield 56 Springfield 116

Conniburrow 57 Stacey Bushes 117

Crownhill 58 Stantonbury 118

Denbigh East 59 Stoke Goldington 119

Downhead Park 60 Stony Stratford 120

Downs Barn 61 Tattenhoe 121

Eaglestone 62 Tinkers Bridge 122

Emberton 63 Two Mile Ash 123

Emerson Valley 64 Tyringham & Filgrave 124

Far Bletchley 65 Walnut Tree 125

Fenny Stratford 66 Walton Park 126

Fishermead 67 Warrington 127

Fullers Slade 68 Water Eaton 128

Furzton 69 Wavendon 129

Galley Hill 70 Wavendon Gate 130

Gayhurst 71 West Bletchley 131

Giffard Park 72 Westcroft 132

Granby 73 Weston Underwood 133

Grange Farm 74 Willen 134

Great Holm 75 Willen Park 135

Great Linford 76 Woburn Sands 136

Greenleys 77 Wolverton 137

Hanslope 78 Woolstone 138

Hardmead 79 Woughton Park 139

Haversham/Little Linford 80 Woughton-on-the-Green 140


3/142

2 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2009/10

FOREWORD

Developing a thriving neighbourhood: what do the data say about MK?

It has been a challenging year in which to be the lead council

member for regeneration and the economy but also a veryheartening year. I have seen at first hand the enthusiasm withwhich the council, town and parish councils, other agencies andresidents are now working in partnership to make ambitious plansfor a better future. I strongly believe that local communities knowtheir areas best, and that our job is to enable them to improve lifethere.

The Social Atlas is produced because we need to start our plansfor the future from where we are now. Each of us sees a smallpart of the picture; the social atlas helps us look at it as a whole. Itgives us a snapshot of statistical facts for Milton Keynes andassists us in shedding light on the nature of our communities and some of the issues theyface. As well as informing action needed, I hope it will help each community understanditself better; decide what it likes, and what it needs to change.

The success of Milton Keynes will be judged by how well all of our communities thrive. Wemust ensure that our services and programmes reach those that most need them and thatour established communities have the same attention and focus as the newer developingareas. The Social Atlas is an ideal tool in helping us to identify where we need to focus ourenergy. Every area has its strengths and weaknesses. Hopefully using this document wecan focus attention on where our help is needed most and work with partners to improve andenhance life on MK estates.

Jenni FerransCabinet Member for Economic Development,Regeneration & Community Cohesion

In case of queries about the data, contact either:

Lesley PotterMilton Keynes IntelligenceSpatial PlanningMilton Keynes CouncilCivic OfficesMilton KeynesMK9 3HQ01908 [email protected]

Paul EdwardsMilton Keynes IntelligenceSpatial PlanningMilton Keynes CouncilCivic OfficesMilton KeynesMK9 3HQ01908 [email protected]

An electronic copy of this publication can be found on the MKi Observatory web site, where

datasets can also be downloaded: www.mkiobservatory.org.uk


4/142


EXECUTIVE SUMMARYMilton Keynes as a whole is relatively affluent and most people enjoy a good quality oflife but significant numbers of residents experience disadvantage in one or morecategories. Some examples are below:

Income

On average 237 per 1,000 dwellings in Milton Keynes get housing or council taxbenefit, a means tested benefit. This has risen for the second year in succession,probably reflecting the current economic situation. The highest rate is 585 per 1,000dwellings in Beanhill, a rate which has fallen from last year.

Children & EducationThere are seven indicators in this category covering a diverse range of topics

affecting children. Numbers of children getting free school meals is a traditionalindicator of disadvantage that shows a large variation across estates. The average is13% of pupils with the highest, 45%, in Netherfield.

As educational attainment has a strong association with future disadvantage,the following 3 indicators focus on this. To try to estimate the proportion of young

people not going into higher education we look at the proportion of 18-24 year olds notgetting student awards. The average across Milton Keynes is 89%. The remainingindicators look at educational attainment in schools. Firstly, the proportion attainingbelow level 4 in Key Stage 2 English. The Milton Keynes average is 21%, with greatvariation across estates. The English average is 19%. Performance has improvedsince introduction of the tests. In 1997, nationally 37% of pupils were failing to reachlevel 4, and 41% of pupils in Milton Keynes. The second of these indicators assessesthe proportion of pupils gaining less than 5 GCSEs at grade A*-C includingMathematics and English. The Milton Keynes average is 52%, the highest is 100% in 7estates. The English average is 49% of pupils.

Community Factors

Community factors include those affecting how people feel about their homeenvironment. There are several different factors in this category including domesticfires; recorded crime and neighbour complaints.

Domestic fires have been found to correlate strongly with disadvantage.Looking over a rolling 5-year period, on average there were 8.3 fires per 1,000dwellings in Milton Keynes from 2004 to 2009. The highest was 36.2 per 1,000dwellings in Central Milton Keynes. Crime data has been included for violent crime,burglaries and criminal damage. The highest rates of both violent crime and criminaldamage occur in Central Milton Keynes because of the high visitor population. CentralMilton Keynes also saw the highest rate of neighbour complaints to EnvironmentalHealth with 130 complaints per 1,000 dwellings. The Milton Keynes average was 34

per 1,000 dwellings.

Health & DisabilityThere are 6 health and disability indicators listed in the grid profiles, although

only 4 of these are used in the calculation of the overall rankings. Teenageconceptions: on average there were 62 conceptions per 1,000 girls aged 15 to 19. A 2-year average time period is considered, but the rate has risen substantially. Disabledconcessionary fares and clients of disabled services are included as pointers towardsareas where the population has a greater need for support. Some of the variations inthese factors are explained by the dominant style of dwelling in the estate, for examplemore bungalows.

The final 3 indicators focus on hospital activity. The emergency admission rate

was 101 per 1,000 population per year. Non-emergency hospital admissions wereincluded for information; this indicator was not included in the overall rankings. Visits toaccident and emergency were also included in the estate profiles.


5/142


INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this series of documents is to enable people working towards Social Inclusion

to identify:

the most significant social inclusion issues

geographic concentrations of need the relative severity of social exclusion compared with other areas and the national

picture

a snapshot position

geographic areas and issues where development of services and initiatives might be

focused

to measure change

It also serves to prompt discussion on possible causes of inequality and suggestions for

actions to achieve improvement.

The data used are primarily locally collected data, intended to highlight areas with a high

need for public services. Earlier work included developing a framework to structure

information gathering, along the lines of those used by the government in Opportunity for

All and by bodies such as the Joseph Rowntree Trust. The framework has the following

categories:

Income

Children

Young adults

Adults aged 25 to retirement

Older people

Community factors

Health and disability

The indicators included this year are directly comparable, with the only difference being a

recent change in the computer system used to record family referrals data, which may lead

to differences.

The ideals restricting choices for indicators are that:

They should be capable of being collected at ward and/or below ward level

They should be commonly available across all local authorities

They should ideally allow for national comparisons

They should have an acknowledged relationship with disadvantage.

Useful developments since the first document have been:

1. The setting up of the Office for National Statistics website for the Neighbourhood

Statistics Service. Extensive amounts of data, from the 2001 census and other

administrative data sources, are available at local level at no cost. The site can be

found at www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk

2. The development and updating of the Index of Multiple Deprivation, a multi-

dimensional indicator available to lower-super output area level, published in 2000,

2004 and 2007.3. The development of the MK Observatory, a web-based data resource to share, map

and visualise data. The web site can be found at: www.mkiobservatory.org.uk


6/142


LOCAL AUTHORITY LEVEL DATA

Floor Targets 2010

Floor targets are indicators aimed at helping government and councils to narrow the gap

between deprived areas and the national average in terms of health, education, crime,employment and housing. They will also identify areas where progress is not being made.

They will enable all those involved in neighbourhood renewal to identify priority areas,

monitor progress and compare themselves with others.

The table below outlines how Milton Keynes compares to the national and regional average.

Data coloured in red indicates Milton Keynes data is worse than the national average.

Table 1: Floor Targets 2010, Milton Keynes, South East and England

For more information on floor targets, including other comparator geographies and time

series analysis please visit www.fti.communities.gov.uk/fti/

IndicatorMilton

Keynes

England South

East

Economic

Overall employment rate 2009 (Quarter 2) 78.9 73.9 78.3

Burglary: offences per 1,000 households 2008/9 11.2 12.5 8.7

Vehicle crime: offences per 1,000 population 2008/9 13.0 10.0 8.2

Robbery: offences per 1,000 population 2008/9 1.3 1.5 0.7

Overall crime rate (recorded crime BCS Comparator) 2008/9 60.4 49.7 44.3

Sexual Offences: per 1,000 population 2008/9 1.2 0.9 0.9

Violence against the person: per 1000 population 2008/9 26.4 16.4 16.1

% of 16 year olds achieving 5+ GCSEs grades A*-C 2008/9 69.5 70.0 70.2% of 11 year olds achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4 English 2008/9 79.0 80.0 81.0

% of 14 year olds achieving Key Stage 3 Level 5 English 2006/7 74.0 74.0 76.0

Male life expectancy at birth 2006-8 78.1 77.9 79.2

Female life expectancy at birth 2006-8 81.8 82.0 83.0

Mortality rate: circulatory diseases 2006-8 77.9 74.8 62.5

Mortality rate: cancer 2006-8 113.2 114.0 106.3

Mortality rate: suicide and undetermined injury 2006-8 7.0 7.8 7.5

Conception rate: under 18's per 1,000. 2006-8 41.5 40.9 33.0

Transport

Overall road accident rate: all casualities (per 1,000 pop) 2007 5.2 4.3 4.4

Road casualties:people k illed and seriously injured (per 1,000 pop) 2007 0.4 0.5 0.5

Road casualties:children k illed and seriously injured (per 1,000 pop) 2007 0.2 0.3 0.2

% residents satisfied with local parks and open spaces 2008 82.5 72.6 76

Crime

Education

Health

Environment


7/142


SUMMARY OF INDICATOR TRENDSTable 2: Summary of Indicator Trends

Note: this definition assumes higher uptake of services is worse, in reality the converse could

be true in that more eligible persons are being identified. All comparisons are between rates

so are unaffected by population growth.

* Policy changes since the 2001 Social Atlas may have encouraged an increase in the

number of Family Referrals.

2001 2009

Income Indicators

Housing/Council Tax Benefit claimants

Free School Meals Uptake

Children Indicators

Family Referrals*

Children with Special Educational Needs

Young Adults Indicator

18-24 year olds not receiving student awards

Older people Indicator

Older People clients of Neighbourhood Services

Community Indicators

Violent Crime

Burglary Dwelling

Criminal Damage

Domestic Fires

Neighbour Complaints

Health and Disability Indicators

Disabled Concessionary Fares

Disabled Clients of Neighbourhood Services

Emergency Hospital Admissions

Trend Since

data shows improving trend since the 2001Social Atlas(SA)/2009 data

data shows worsening trend since the 2001SA/2009 data

data broadly constant (within 10%) since the 2001SA/2009 data

only baseline data available or insufficient data available to determine a trend

Indicator trend key:


8/142


THE DATA AT WARD LEVEL

Map 1: Milton Keynes Ward Boundaries


9/142


BOROUGH PROFILE

There are 23 wards in Milton Keynes, as can be seen in map 1. Many datasets are available

nationally published at ward level. This often allows for national comparison of data such as

those listed below.

Income

Income Support Claimants August 2009: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

Income Support is a means-tested benefit available to certain groups of people on

low incomes.

Children

Lone Parent Claimants of Income Support August 2009: DWP.

Young Adults

Youth Unemployment April 2010: NOMIS

Income Support August 2009: DWP.

Student Award Claimants Sept 2009: Buckinghamshire County Council

Older People

Pensioner Credit Claimants August 2009: DWP. A new benefit for pensioners.

Pension Credit has two elements: a top up element to bring pensioners up to aguaranteed income level and a savings credit element which will reward those who

have small levels of savings.

Community

Neighbour Complaints: MKC 2009-10

Health and Disability

Life Expectancy 2004-2008 Average: MKC 2009

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) Claimants August 2009: DWP

DLA is a benefit for people Under 65 who have an illness or disability. It provides

extra money for people who need help with personal care and/or help with walking. It

is not means-tested and can be claimed both when in work, or when claiming other

benefits.

Incapacity Benefit (IB) and Severe Disablement Allowance August 2009: DWP

IB is a contributory benefit for people with illnesses or disabilities who are unable to

work, and who have made sufficient National Insurance (NI) contributions.


10/142


INDEX OF MULTIPLE DEPRIVATION 2007

What is it?

Map 2: IMD 2007 Overall Deprivation Rank

The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 (IMD 2007) is

the government measure of deprivation. It is used toanalyse patterns of deprivation, identify areas that

would benefit from special initiatives or programmes

and as a tool to determine eligibility for specific

funding streams.

It combines a number of indicators, chosen to cover a

range of economic, social and housing issues, into a

single deprivation score for each small area in

England. This allows each area to be ranked relative

to one another according to their level of deprivation.As with the 2004 indices, IMD 2007 has been

produced at District Level and at Lower Super Output

Area level (LSOA), of which there are 32,482 in the

country. There are 139 LSOAs in Milton Keynes.

Milton Keynes District

The map to the right shows the IMD 2007 mapped for the districts in England. The figures for

Milton Keynes show that:

Milton Keynes is ranked 212 out of 354 Local Authority Districts (with 1 being the

most deprived), this is a slight improvement on the 2004 rank of 204.

Districts ranked closely to Milton Keynes include; Solihull, Kettering, Cheltenham and

West Dorset.

Milton Keynes Lower Super Output Area Analysis

As stated previously IMD 2007 was released at LSOA level. Map 3 overleaf shows the

results for Milton Keynes Super Output Areas.

The table to the left shows the number of LSOAs in Milton

Keynes within the most/least deprived 10%, 20%, 30% LSOAs

in England with a comparison to the 2004 Index. The table

shows that of the 139 LSOAs in Milton Keynes there are 6 which

are within the 10% most deprived in England. This compares to

5 in 2004. Overall there are 22 LSOAs within the most deprived

30%, the same number as with the 2004 Index. There are 14

LSOAs within the least deprived 10% in England, the same

number as in the 2004 Index.

LSOAs Within Decile:

90-100%80-90%

70-80%

60-70%

50-60%

40-50%

30-40%

20-30%

10-20%

0-10%

Deprivation Rank

Least

Most

Table 3: LSOAs in MKwithin the 30% most & 30%

2004 2007

0-10% 5 6

10-20% 8 9

20-30% 9 7

0-10% 14 14

10-20% 26 35

20-30% 31 23

Number of LSOAs

Within Most Deprived

Within Least Deprived


11/142


Map 3: IMD 2007 deciles in Milton Keynes compared to England

The map outlines that there are 6 LSOAs in MK which are within the most deprived 10% in

England. These areas cover a large part of Woughton Ward and part of Eaton Manor

Ward. Overall there are 22 LSOAs within the most deprived 30%. There are 14 areas

within the least deprived 10%: these are in rural areas, Newport Pagnell and some areas inthe city.

90-100%

80-90%

70-80%

60-70%

50-60%

40-50%

30-40%

20-30%

10-20%

0-10%

Deprivation Rank

Least

Most


90-100%

80-90%

70-80%

60-70%

50-60%

40-50%30-40%

20-30%

10-20%

0-10%

Deprivation Rank

Least

Most


12/142


Map 4: Child Wellbeing Index 2007

The Child Well-being Index (CWI) was produced for Communities and Local Government(CLG) by the Social Policy Research Unit and the Social Disadvantage Research Centre atthe University of Oxford. It is an index created to estimate child well-being and is made up ofseven domains: Material well-being, Health, Education, Crime, Housing, Environment, andChildren in need.


90-100%

80-90%

70-80%

60-70%

50-60%

40-50%30-40%

20-30%

10-20%

0-10%

Highest

Lowest


13/142


UNEMPLOYMENT

In April 2010 there were 7,306 people in Milton Keynes

claiming Job Seekers Allowance. As a percentage of the

working age population in Milton Keynes this is 4.6%. Milton

Keynes has a similar unemployment rate to other urban areasin the South Midlands. Milton Keynes has a significantly higher

unemployment rate than both the national average (3.9%) and

the South East Region (2.8%).

1,290 claimants in MK had been claiming for more than one

year in April 2010, 17.6% of total claimants. This compares to

15.5% in the South East region and 16.7% in the UK.

The number of claimants in Milton

Keynes remained roughly the same(+0.25%) between April 2009 and April

2010. Figure 1 shows the

unemployment rate for Milton Keynes,

the South East and the UK.

There are 11 wards in MK with higher

unemployment rates than the UK.

Campbell Park (8.2%) Eaton Manor

(7.8%) and Woughton (7.6%) have the

highest unemployment rates in MK.These wards are within the 6%

highest ranked wards in the UK. Olney

has the lowest unemployment rate in

Milton Keynes and is within the 30% lowest unemployment for wards in the UK.

Figure 2: Unemployment Rates for Milton Keynes Wards, April 2010

Table 4: Unemployment ratesfor selected areas, April 2010

Region %

Milton Keynes 4.6South Eas t Region 2.8

UK 3.9

Bedford 4.1

Luton 5.0

Northampton 4.6

Wellingborough 4.2

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.55.0

Apr-0

0

Apr-0

1

Apr-0

2

Apr-0

3

Apr-0

4

Apr-0

5

Apr-0

6

Apr-0

7

Apr-0

8

Apr-0

9

Apr-1

0

Date

%

UKMKSE

Figure 1: Unemployment Trends, April 2000 - 2010

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

.

CampbellPark

EatonManor

Woughton

Bradwell

BletchleyandF

ennyStratford

Wolverton

Denbigh

Stantonbury

S

tonyStratford

Whaddon

Middleton

LinfordSouth

WaltonPark

Furzton

LinfordNorth

LoughtonPark

E

mersonValley

Danesborough

NewportPagnellSouth

Newpor

tPagnellNorth

Sherington

HanslopePark

Olney

MiltonKeynes

Rate(%)

UK Ave. = 3.9


14/142


OVERSEAS MIGRANT WORKERS IN MILTON KEYNES

All European Economic Area (EEA) and Swiss nationals are free to enter and live in the

United Kingdom. From 1st May 2004, 8 Eastern European 'accession states' joined the EU

(the A8). Workers from the A8 countries who find employment in the UK are required to

register with the Home Office under the Worker Registration Scheme as soon as they findwork. They are then issued with a worker registration certificate, issued for a 12-month

period. This proves that they can live and work in the UK while they are working in that job. If

they change jobs before the 12 months they have to renew their registration. Once 12

months has been completed under the Worker Registration Scheme they can apply for an

EEA Residence permit.

Table 5: Origin of Worker Registration Scheme applicants working in Milton Keynes

Since the accession states joined the EU a total of 3,770 have registered under the scheme

for a workplace address in Milton Keynes. This does not imply that there are over 3,000

residents from the accession states. The workers may not live in Milton Keynes. We have no

information about how long the workers remained with the employer, or in the country.

It is evident that the flow of workers has reduced, with only 365 registering in the current

year, continuing the downward trend. The vast majority of WRS migrants are from Poland -

67% in the 23 months to the end of March 2006 and almost 74% overall. However, in the

most recent 12 month period, the numbers from Latvia and Lithuania have risen sharply.

The most common job that migrants came to do in Milton Keynes is 'warehouse operative';

the occupation stated by 41% of WRS applicants. 18% stated 'process operative', and a

further 7% packers so factory work attracts two thirds of these migrants.

Figure 3: Most stated occupations of WRS applicants in 2009/10

Czech Rep Estonia Hungary Latvia Lithuania Poland Slovakia Slovenia

May 04 - March 06 55 10 45 30 170 780 70 0 1,160

Percentage 4.7 0.9 3.9 2.6 14.7 67.2 6.0 0.0 100.0

April 06 - March 07 17 6 20 16 70 795 50 0 960

Percentage 1.8 0.6 2.1 1.7 7.3 82.8 5.2 0.0 100.0

April 07 - March 08 16 4 25 8 55 635 36 0 770Percentage 2.1 0.5 3.2 1.0 7.1 82.5 4.7 0.0 100.0

April 08 - March 09 16 3 20 10 50 375 35 4 515

Percentage 3.1 0.6 3.9 1.9 9.7 72.8 6.8 0.8 100.0

April 09 - March 10 8 9 17 55 75 200 9 1 365

Percentage 2.2 2.5 4.7 15.1 20.5 54.8 2.5 0.3 100.0

May 04 - March 10 112 32 127 119 420 2,785 200 5 3,770

Percentage 3.0 0.8 3.4 3.2 11.1 73.9 5.3 0.1 100.0

Milton Keynes applications Country of origin Total

41%

18%

7%

4%

3%

3%

2%

22%

Warehouse Operative

Process operative (other

Factory worker)

Packer

Food processing operative

(fruit / veg)

Waiter, waitress

Maid / Room attendant

(hotel)

Kitchen and catering

assistantsAll Other Occupations


15/142


INCOME

Overall in Milton Keynes a smaller proportion of the population claim income support than for

England as a whole. Milton Keynes had a rate of 44.6 per 1,000 working age population

compared to 49.0 per 1,000 in England.

There is significant variation in the rates of income support claimants between the wards in

Milton Keynes. Woughton ward has more than double the national rate. Estates covered by

this ward include Beanhill, Coffee Hall, Eaglestone, Leadenhall, Netherfield and Tinkers

Bridge. Eaton Manor Ward is also significantly above national average rate of income

support claimants.

Figure 4: Income Support Claimants for Milton Keynes Wards, August 2009

CHILDREN

In August 2009, 3,385 Lone Parent families claimed Income Support in Milton Keynes. This

is a rate of 21.5 per 1,000 working age population and is slightly higher than that of England

as a whole (18.5 per 1,000). There are 12 wards in Milton Keynes with a higher than the

England average of lone parents claiming Income Support. Eaton Manor and Woughton

Wards are more than twice the national average.

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Woughton

EatonM

anor

CampbellPark

StonyStra

tford

BletchleyandFennyStratford

De

nbigh

Bradwell

Wolv

erton

Stanton

bury

Walton

Park

Fu

rzton

Wha

ddon

LinfordS

outh

Midd

leton

LinfordNorth

Loughton

Park

EmersonV

alley

NewportPagnellSouth

NewportPagnellNorth

Sherington

Danesborough

O

lney

Hanslope

Park

Claimantsper1,000population

Eng. Ave=49.0


16/142


Figure 5: Lone Parent Income Support Claimants for Milton Keynes Wards, August 2009

YOUNG ADULTS

Table 6 shows the number and

percentage of 18-24 year olds

claiming Job Seekers Allowance inApril 2010 and 16-24 year olds

claiming Income Support in August

2009. The cells marked in green

mean they are higher than the

England rate.

Campbell Park (13.7%) and

Bletchley and Fenny Stratford

(13.5%) have the highest % of 18-24

years claiming Job SeekersAllowance. This compares to 5.5%

in England.

Bletchley & Fenny Stratford, and

Eaton Manor Wards have double the

England average (3.8%) of 16-24

year olds claiming Income Support.

Very low levels of young adults claim

Job Seekers Allowance or IncomeSupport in the rural areas of Milton

Keynes.

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

EatonManor

Woughton

Bletchley&Fe

nnyStratford

C

ampbellPark

Wolverton

StonyStratford

Denbigh

Stantonbury

Bradwell

Middleton

Whaddon

Furzton

WaltonPark

LinfordSouth

Em

ersonValley

LinfordNorth

L

oughtonPark

NewportP

agnellSouth

NewportPagnellNorth

H

anslopePark

Olney

Sherington

D

anesborough

M

iltonKeynes

Per1,000

Eng A ve. = 18.5

18-24 % 16-24 %

Bletchley & Fenny Stratf ord 155 13.5 115 8.1

Bradw ell 165 11.8 85 4.7

Campbell Park 215 13.7 115 6.0

Danesborough 10 3.1 10 2.4

Denbigh 95 12.8 60 6.3

Eaton Manor 115 11.9 95 7.7

Emerson Valley 65 5.4 55 3.2

Furzton 45 6.1 40 4.1

Hanslope Park 10 4.2 5 1.5

Linford North 35 4.6 25 2.5

Linford South 65 7.6 30 2.7

Loughton Park 65 4.8 55 2.9

Middleton 65 7.4 50 4.3

New port Pagnell North 30 4.2 15 1.6

New port Pagnell South 25 3.6 25 2.7

Olney 25 4.7 10 1.3

Sherington 15 5.5 5 1.3

Stantonbury 90 9.2 65 5.1

Stony Stratford 90 8.7 80 6.2

Walton Park 60 6.0 50 3.5

Whaddon 75 9.3 55 5.2

Wolverton 160 11.7 120 6.8

Woughton 155 12.9 105 6.9

Milton Keynes 1830 7.0 1260 4.9

England 363,265 5.5 238,490 3.8

Unemployment Income Support

Table 6: Youth Unemployment and Income Support


17/142


Figure 6 shows the number of Student Award claimants per 1,000 18-24 years old for wards

in Milton Keynes. A significant number of Milton Keynes wards fall beneath the MK average

(110.8 per 1,000 18-24 year olds). Woughton and Eaton Manor Wards have particularly low

proportions. Olney, Sherington and Walton Park wards have the highest proportions.

Figure 6: Student Award claimants 2009 per 1,000 18-24 year olds

OLDER PEOPLE7,200 people aged 60 and over were in claiming Pension Credit in August 2009. This is

185.4 per 1,000 population age 60 and over, slightly lower than the England average of

198.7 per 1,000. 7 out of 23 wards in Milton Keynes are above the national average with

Woughton (325.8 per 1,000) standing out as significantly higher than the other wards.

Bradwell, Furzton, Eaton Manor, Linford South, Campbell Park and Stantonbury Wards also

have a higher than average number claiming Pension Credit.

A total of 30,460 people in Milton Keynes claimed a state pension in August 2009. This is128.7 per 1,000 population, significantly lower than the England average of 185.9 per 1,000,

reflecting the young profile of Milton Keynes population.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Woughton

EatonManor

Wolverton


Denbigh

CampbellPark

Stantonbury

Whaddon

Middleton

Bradwell

NewportPagnellNorth

Furzton

LinfordSouth

NewportPagnellSouth

StonyStratford

HanslopePark

LoughtonPark

Danesborough

LinfordNorth

EmersonValley

WaltonPark

Sherington

Olney

Per1,000

M K Ave. = 110.8


18/142


Figure 7: Pension Credit Claimants for Milton Keynes Wards, August 2009

The graph below shows there are significant variations between the wards in Milton Keynes

of the proportion of people claiming a state pension. Sherington, Danesborough and

Bletchley and Fenny Stratford Wards are significantly above the England average. The

wards with the lowest state pension claimants are Emerson Valley (52.3 per 1,000),

Middleton (52.7) and Walton Park (63.4).

Figure 8: State Pension Claimants for Milton Keynes Wards, August 2009

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

Sherington

Danesborough

Ble

tchley&FennyStratford

HanslopePark

StonyStratford

Olney

Whaddon

Denbigh

NewportPagnellNorth

LinfordNorth

NewportPagnellSouth

LinfordSouth

Stantonbury

EatonManor

Bradwell

Woughton

Wolverton

Furzton

LoughtonPark

CampbellPark

WaltonPark

Middleton

EmersonValley

MiltonKeynes

Per1,000

Eng Ave. = 185.9

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

400.0

Woughton

Bradwell

Furzton

EatonManor

LinfordSouth

CampbellPark

Stantonbury

Bletchley&FennyStratford

LoughtonPark

S

tonyStratford

EmersonValley

LinfordNorth

Wolverton

Denbigh

WaltonPark

Newport

PagnellSouth

Whaddon

Newport

PagnellNorth

D

anesborough

Olney

Sherington

Middleton

HanslopePark

MiltonKeynes

Per1,000

Eng A ve. = 198.7


19/142


NEIGBOURHOOD COMPLAINTS AT WARD LEVEL

Neighbour complaints are an important tool for assessing the quality of life enjoyed in a

neighbourhood. These are complaints by residents about their neighbours made to the

Environmental Health service. Historically, the greatest numbers of complaints are about

excessive and untimely noise. This year has seen complaints about various causes of noiseincluding construction and street works. The rate of neighbour complaints per 1,000

dwellings has risen compared to the previous year, for the fourth year in sucession. Some

large differences are apparent when examined at ward level, although every ward with the

exception of Danesborough has experienced an increase.

The rural areas show generally lower complaints about neighbours, after accounting for the

number of dwellings, than the urban areas. Olney ward has the lowest number of complaints

per 1,000 dwellings; nearby Sherington is also low and both areas have seen a substantial

increase from the previous year. The lower level of complaints could be a result of the lower

housing density in these areas. Campbell Park and Bletchley & Fenny Stratford are thewards with the highest rate of complaints. Campbell Park has shown a rise from the previous

year, and has the highest rate of complaints in the borough.

Figure 9: Rate of Neighbour Complaints by Ward per 1,000 Dwellings 2008/9 to 2009/10

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Cam

pbellPark

BletchleyandFenny

Stratford

W

olverton

EatonManor

Bradwell

W

oughton

Middleton

WaltonPark

Sta

ntonbury

Denbigh

LinfordSouth

Dane

sborough

Linf

ordNorth

Emers

onValley

Stony

Stratford

Whaddon

Furzton

Hans

lopePark

Loug

htonPark

NewportPagnellSouth

NewportPag

nellNorth

S

herington

Olney

Per1,000dwellings

Rate 08/09

Rate 09/10


20/142


HEALTH AND DISABILITY

Life expectancy is a focus of national government targets to reduce inequalities in health

outcomes. Life expectancy is linked to social circumstances, and despite improvements the

gap is large, and in some areas is widening. Specifically by 2010, the target is to reduce the

gap in life expectancy at birth, by area, by 10%. Life expectancy at birth does not reflect thelife experience of any individual. Instead, it provides a summary of the mortality experience of

the individuals living in a particular area, over a period of time. Gaps in life expectancy can

be observed between local authority areas. For example, in 2006/2008 in England a

difference of 10.7 years was observed between areas with the highest life expectancy at birth

for boys, and areas with the lowest. The gap when Scotland is included is even higher, at

13.6 years. The gap for girls in England was 10.1 years. The gaps within these areas can be

even wider. The current situation for Milton Keynes can be seen from the chart below.

Figure 10: Persons Life Expectancy at Birth by Ward, 2004 to 2008 Average

The average life expectancy in Milton Keynes for 2004-2008 was 79.3 years, slightly higher

than the previous year although this may be due to statistical fluctuations. The range was

almost 12 years, a substantial increase based on a substantially higher life expectancy in

one particular ward. This ward is Middleton with a life expectancy at birth of 86.2 years.Woughton has the lowest life expectancy of 74.4 years, but this has risen by around 1 year

since the previous calculations.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Bletchley & Fenny Stratford

Bradw ell

Campbell Park

Danesborough

Denbigh

Eaton Manor

Emerson Valley

Furzton

Hanslope Park

Linford North

Linford South

Loughton Park

Middleton

Newport Pagnell North

Newport Pagnell South

Olney

Sherington

Stantonbury

Stony Stratford

Walton Park

Whaddon

Wolverton

Woughton

Life Expectancy (Years)


21/142


The life expectancy at birth was 77.3 years for males, range 9.9 years. This is higher than

previously although the range has increased. This is equivalent to the 77.27 years average

male life expectancy for the UK, but below that for England & Wales of 77.54 years.

Middleton had the highest life expectancy for males of 81.9 years. Woughton has the lowest

life expectancy for males of 72.1 years.

The life expectancy at birth for females in Milton Keynes has risen to 81.3 years, and the

range has risen to 14.1 years. This is below the female life expectancy in England & Wales,

2005/2007 which was 81.74 years although these are not directly comparable because of the

different time periods covered. Middleton had the highest life expectancy of 90.6 years with

Hanslope Park second with 88.0 years. Woughton again had the lowest at 76.6 years, an

increase from the previous figure. There is a reasonably high level of consistency over time

between the rankings of life expectancy (the relative position of wards) for the calculations.

There is some variation due to statistical uncertainty surrounding such small-area

calculations which is to be expected.

Nationally available disability benefits data provide us with results at ward level. Milton

Keynes has a lower proportion of residents claiming Severe Disability Living Allowance,

Incapacity Benefits and Disability Living Allowance than for England as a whole. Woughton

ward is consistently higher than the national average for both disability benefits. It has almost

twice the average Incapacity Benefit/Severe DLA rate. Eaton Manor Ward also has higher

than the national average in both benefits.

Figure 11: Disability Benefit Claimants for Milton Keynes Wards, August 2009

Indicators such as Disabled Concessionary Fares and Clients of Disabled Services at Milton

Keynes Council are useful at looking at local health and disability. They have been useful inpointing out several areas of need, such as Beanhill, Coffee Hall, Pennyland, Stacey Bushes

and Willen Park. These can be seen in the estate indicators section.

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Woughton

EatonManor

Denbigh

Stantonbury


StonyStratford

CampbellPark

LinfordNorth

Bradwell

LinfordSouth

Whaddon

Furzton

LoughtonPark

Wolverton

WaltonPark

HanslopePark

NewportPagnellNorth

NewportPagnellSouth

EmersonValley

Middleton

Sherington

Danesborough

Olney

MiltonKeynes

Per1,000population

Disability Living Allowance (Eng Ave. 49)

Incapacity Benefit and severe DLA (Eng Ave. 55.4)


22/142


Map 5: Smoking Prevalence estimates by Estate per 1,000 population aged 16-74*

*Derived from national data: smoking prevalence estimates were calculated based on General Household Survey

2006 national smoking rates by gender and socio-economic class. These were applied to 2001 census estate

level estimates of the socio-economic structure of the population to get an estimate of the numbers of smokers by

estate. This was then calculated as a proportion of the total estate population aged 16-74. The proportion of the

population in different socio-economic groups is assumed not to have altered significantly since 2001.


23/142


Map 6: Average annual Smoking Cessation successful 4-week quitters, 2007-2009 by Estate per 1,000

population aged 16-74


24/142


25/142


DEFINITIONS AND METHODSDescribing the data used in the estate profiles and the source of the data.

INCOME

Housing/Council Tax Benefit June 2010

Postcoded information on claimants was aggregated to estates/settlements and

expressed per 1,000 dwellings. Estates and settlements are then ranked according to this

figure. Milton Keynes average = 237.3 per 1,000 dwellings claim benefit.

CHILDREN

Family Referrals April 2009 - March 2010

Counts of families referred to Social Services by estate expressed per 1,000

dwellings. Milton Keynes average = 27.5 per 1,000 dwellings.

Note: this data has been derived from a new system, so may not be directly

comparable with pre 2008 data

Nursery Place Non-uptake 2010

Count of 3 and 4 year olds not attending a nursery or play school. Milton Keynes

average = 282.2 per 1,000 3 and 4 year olds.

Nursery school information comes from summer 2009 nurseries and the 2010 school

census.

Children with Special Educational Needs (4 to 18 year olds) March 2010

Postcoded data on children statemented with special educational needs is

aggregated and expressed per 1,000 pupils. Estates and settlements are then ranked

according to this figure. Milton Keynes average = 35.5 per 1,000 pupils.

Free School Meals March 2010

Postcoded information was aggregated to estates and settlements and expressed

per 1,000 pupils. Estates and settlements are then ranked according to this figure. Milton

Keynes average = 125.4 per 1,000 pupils.

Educational attainment 2009

The proportion of eligible pupils attaining BELOW Key Stage 2 level 4+ in English

expressed per 1,000. Milton Keynes average: 212.3 per 1,000 pupils.

The proportion of eligible pupils gaining LESS THAN 5 GCSEs at grade A*-C

INCLUDING Mathematics and English expressed per 1,000. Milton Keynes average: 521.5

per 1,000 pupils.

YOUNG ADULTS

18-24 year olds Not Receiving Student Awards September 2009

Postcoded information is aggregated and expressed per 1,000 18 to 24 year olds.Milton Keynes average = 891.0 per 1,000 18 to 24 year olds.


26/142


Note: this data has been derived from a new system, so may not be directly

comparable with previous data

OLDER PEOPLE

Older People Clients of Neighbourhood Services April 2009 - March 2010

Postcoded data on clients is aggregated and expressed per 1,000 pensioners.

Estates and settlements are then ranked according to this figure. Milton Keynes average =

73.4 per 1,000 pensioners.

COMMUNITY FACTORS

Domestic Fires Data April 2004 to March 2009

Bucks Fire and Rescue Services postcoded data on domestic fires is aggregated to

estates and settlements and expressed per 1,000 households. Milton Keynes average = 8.3

per 1,000 households over 5 years.

Violent Crime April 2009 - March 2010

Recorded Violent crime at estate and settlement level is expressed per 1,000 total

population. Milton Keynes average = 25.6 per 1,000 people.

Burglary (Dwellings) April 2009 - March 2010

Recorded Burglary from dwellings at estate and settlement level is expressed per

1,000 dwellings. Milton Keynes average = 12.0 per 1,000 dwellings.

Criminal Damage April 2009 - March 2010

Recorded Criminal Damage is expressed per 1,000 population at estate and

settlement level. Milton Keynes average = 16.7 per 1,000 people.

Social Rented Housing March 2010

MKC Council and Registered Social Landlord rented stock at estate and settlement is

expressed per 1,000 dwellings. Milton Keynes average = 190.7 per 1,000 dwellings

Neighbour Complaints April 2009 - March 2010

Milton Keynes Council Environmental Health postcoded data on domestic nuisance

complaints is aggregated to estate and settlement and expressed per 1,000 dwellings. Milton

Keynes average = 34.3 per 1,000 dwellings.

Adult Continuing Education April 2009 - March 2010

Postcodes of clients enrolled in Adult Continuing Education courses were aggregated

to estate and settlement level and expressed per 1,000 population not enrolled on ACE.

Milton Keynes average = 979.1 per 1,000 people.


Teenage Conceptions (Under 20 year olds) January 2008 - December 2009 annualised.Births and terminations data for teenage girls aged under 20 are aggregated to estate

and settlement and expressed as an annual average per 1,000 15 to 19 year old girls.


27/142


Estates and settlements are then ranked according to this figure. Milton Keynes average =

61.9 per 1,000 15 to 19 year old girls. Concerns over data volatility mean that extreme

caution should be used in the use of this indicator.

Disabled Concessionary Fares August 2010

Postcoded data is aggregated to estate and settlement and expressed per 1,000

population. Milton Keynes average = 11.7 per 1,000 people.

Disabled Clients of Neighbourhood Services April 2009 - March 2010

Postcoded data from Neighbourhood Services on teams for Learning disability,

Physical disability, Mental Health, Duty Team, Joint Elderly and Mental Health, and the

Hospital is aggregated to estate and settlement and expressed per 1,000 population. Milton

Keynes average = 8.9 per 1,000 people aged 18-64.

Emergency Admissions April 2008 - March 2010

The number of Emergency Admissions into hospital are expressed per year per

1,000 population. Milton Keynes average = 101.3 per 1,000 people.

Non Emergency Admissions April 2008 - March 2010

The number of Non Emergency Admissions into hospital are expressed per year per

1,000 population. Milton Keynes average = 124.9 per 1,000 people.

A&E Attendances April 2008 - March 2010

The number attendances at the accident and emergency (A&E) are expressed per

year per 1,000 population. Milton Keynes average = 235.4 per 1,000 people.

Population Denominators - Population figures used in this publication are estimates from the

2009/10 Population Bulletin. Age specific populations are estimates based on postcoded

figures from Buckinghamshire Health Authority Patient Registration data from the July 2009

patient register, these figures were then adjusted to match the 2009/10 Population Bulletin

figures.


28/142


ESTATE PROFILES

The information contained in this atlas is derived from the work done for Milton Keynes

Councils Social Inclusion and Health Inequalities Programme. The profiles at estate and

settlement level were prepared to highlight the extent of social exclusion in Milton Keynes

and its concentration in particular areas, with a view to targeting areas to improve localservices and community networks. The intention is to continue to develop using these

indicators, so that the effects of any actions tackling the many aspects of social exclusion

can be monitored.

The profiles also contain summary demographic information about the estate population, and

key results from the 2001 census.

Population June 09 = 500

2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank

(of 108) IndicatorsValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

INCOME

82 76 Housing/Council Tax Benefit June 2010 111.9 47.2

CHILDREN AND EDUCATION

69 35 Family Referrals 2009-10 14.4 52.5

12 5 Nursery Place Non-uptake 2010 485.8 172.1

65 64 Free School Meals March 2010 60.6 48.3

56 65 Special Educational Needs March 2010 30.3 85.4

76 78 Below KS2 L4+ English 2009 0.0 0.0

27 79 Below 5+ A*-C Maths & English GCSE's 2009 666.7 127.8

51 49 18-25 WITHOUT Student Awards Sep 2009 865.5 97.1

OLDER PEOPLE

92 88 Clients of Older People Services 2009/10 11.8 16.1

COMMUNITY FACTORS

72 76 Domestic Fires 2004/9 3.6 43.5

46 101 Violence Against Person 2009/10 15.8 61.6

76 26 Burglary Dwellings 2009/10 7.2 60.3

64 87 Criminal Damage 2009/10 9.9 59.1

89 87 Council & Social Rented Housing March 2010 0.0 0.0

86 76 Neighbour Complaints 2009/10 7.2 21.1

68 62 Adult Continuing Education Students 2009/10 976.3 99.7


S N/A Teenage Conceptions Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 S S

73 88 Disabled Concessionary Fares August 2010 5.9 50.8

83 84 Clients of Disabled Services 2009/10 2.8 31.6

47 76 Emergency Hospital Admissions 2008/10 98.0 96.8

57 46 Non Emergency Hospital Admissions 2008/10 117.0 93.7

56 64 Accident and Emergency Attendance 2008/10 213.0 90.5

Social Atlas Rank = 70

IMD Rank = 90

BLUE BRIDGE

How the valuecompares withthe MKaverage

If more than100 it is more

than average.

e.g. 172.1means abovethe average.

If less than100 it is lessthan averageso its a goodthing.

S = Suppresseddue to issues ofconfidentiality

Actual value forthe particularindicator

N/A = It was notranked for thatindicator as it wasnot applicable

This shadingindicates avalue higherthan 50%above theMK average

This shadingindicates avaluebetween the

average and50% above.

Its positionout of 109estates forthatindicator.

1=worst off

Overall rank from theSocial Atlas: 1 has the

most issues and 109 theleast

Rank of population weighted averageIMD deprivation score at estate level:

1 is the most deprived 108 the least.


29/142


SUMMARY OF INDICATORS FOR ESTATE & SETTLEMENTS

Housing/Council

TaxBenefit

FamilyReferrals

FreeSchoolMea

ls

SpecialEducationalNeeds

TeenageConcep

tions

NotStudentsage

d18-24

Pupilsnotgetting

5+A*-CGCSEs

Pupilsnotgetting

KS2L4+English

NurseryUptake

DomesticFires

NeighbourComp

laints

Council&SocialRent

ViolentCrime

BurglaryDwelling

CriminalDamage

OlderPeopleSer

vices

DisabledConces

sionaryFares

DisabledClients

EmergencyAdmissions

ACE

Ashland 42 37 67 92 S 105 1 76 19 88 73 53 26 46 29 96 48 90 72 8

Astw ood 99 94 97 23 68 87 46 1 99 3 92 80 91 38 104 68 97 90 91 1

Bancroft 84 32 60 32 S 63 27 54 82 31 78 89 102 33 99 64 52 68 71 82

Bancroft Park 71 39 97 92 S 86 1 76 99 88 92 89 99 29 60 96 50 90 75 106

Beanhill 1 1 3 4 17 6 10 11 42 13 37 2 21 11 11 16 1 1 3 13

Blakelands 67 45 66 92 50 60 65 76 9 88 30 89 62 68 49 61 75 89 58 11

Blue Bridge 82 69 65 56 S 51 27 76 12 72 86 89 46 76 64 92 73 83 47 68

Bolbeck Park 37 78 84 74 68 72 75 32 27 26 90 39 96 41 56 40 15 11 22 87Bow Brickhill 87 94 97 8 68 55 94 76 33 69 83 72 98 42 58 59 74 62 100 10

Bradville 27 16 17 29 48 20 25 14 33 30 44 28 31 28 33 57 35 34 38 50

Bradw ell 38 29 33 58 46 50 23 49 72 51 76 44 64 79 75 38 46 57 33 72

Bradw ell Common 30 51 22 41 62 48 30 24 10 57 19 41 32 30 48 47 71 49 54 70

Brickfields 41 66 45 64 24 44 36 51 32 74 39 N/A 85 86 93 33 41 77 24 39

Broughton & Atterbury 57 13 19 47 4 29 38 22 52 63 14 65 36 54 44 96 83 88 65 34

Brow ns Wood 46 63 27 77 45 34 72 52 51 88 87 36 41 43 43 74 7 75 44 76

Caldecotte 90 83 70 89 14 88 31 45 23 84 18 76 45 92 87 91 94 80 96 52

Calverton 85 94 23 92 68 80 94 1 75 6 92 83 30 95 72 65 97 90 74 79

Campbell Park 81 30 72 92 2 9 1 6 21 76 12 46 9 89 27 96 91 82 85 42

Castlethorpe 88 94 79 24 S 81 46 69 22 83 88 64 92 78 101 32 67 90 108 6

Central Bletchley 19 40 34 44 11 19 44 31 48 38 38 N/A 10 64 24 69 17 36 17 85

Central Milton Keynes 40 52 11 2 3 3 1 76 24 1 1 34 1 62 1 87 39 27 52 88

Chicheley 44 50 9 3 68 105 87 N/A 12 88 92 42 63 95 104 56 97 90 77 98

Clifton Reynes 102 22 97 92 68 95 N/A 76 3 88 92 89 89 95 88 66 97 90 42 100

Coffee Hall 5 11 5 10 23 12 17 26 44 17 22 4 20 22 6 15 4 6 5 30

Cold Brayfield 31 94 97 92 68 93 94 N/A 99 88 92 89 103 95 38 7 97 5 97 91

Conniburrow 6 10 6 13 36 25 20 13 65 8 7 11 7 8 7 19 33 20 39 90

Crow nhill 32 23 29 46 35 54 40 47 80 32 66 32 48 80 31 84 22 10 61 65

Denbigh East 94 57 36 92 S 35 27 N/A 1 88 11 N/A 18 20 21 8 88 90 2 63

Dow nhead Park 59 43 82 15 43 78 71 67 90 78 59 71 68 50 66 13 66 33 56 31

Dow ns Barn 16 54 31 40 18 21 46 32 57 25 34 24 39 74 40 41 18 29 31 55

Eaglestone 24 28 30 60 31 8 15 61 58 7 56 10 5 18 10 10 3 61 6 7

Emberton 79 68 62 49 S 47 61 76 5 88 75 58 86 19 104 25 43 65 68 44

Emerson Valley 58 44 57 71 30 56 60 50 91 73 42 50 59 75 67 50 59 63 66 58

Far Bletchley 26 24 39 43 38 30 19 44 46 53 33 N/A 38 52 42 67 30 38 23 37

Fenny Stratford 29 27 23 26 39 22 46 18 74 14 24 N/A 4 1 5 17 25 16 9 81

Fishermead 4 4 2 21 10 13 32 10 95 4 3 7 13 12 20 76 26 44 29 54

Fullers Slade 7 2 7 19 7 16 18 29 89 16 8 5 15 17 15 34 13 26 37 17

Furzton 43 48 43 82 58 36 54 43 78 58 62 45 49 57 51 53 55 51 57 41

Galley Hill 54 75 41 48 25 52 75 3 6 48 29 60 35 91 76 26 62 22 55 96

Gayhurst 108 94 97 92 S 98 94 76 99 10 64 89 80 95 22 96 97 90 106 102

Giffard Park 69 82 80 85 64 66 75 76 27 64 82 88 79 71 54 77 58 74 86 66

Granby 9 72 97 92 1 105 N/A 76 99 36 13 N/A 17 39 2 96 20 3 4 25

Great Holm 68 81 58 76 40 49 70 62 54 46 55 75 76 70 83 49 9 35 51 97

Great Linford 33 20 37 36 56 75 59 17 83 37 51 22 55 34 47 4 31 52 25 46

Greenleys 21 8 8 16 21 7 9 30 97 9 6 12 22 65 19 35 19 56 30 33

Hanslope 76 76 69 27 S 46 35 42 81 61 49 63 77 94 89 79 82 64 109 16

Hardmead 56 94 97 92 68 104 N/A N/A 99 88 92 35 103 2 104 2 11 4 46 107

Haversham/Little Linford 92 85 87 92 S 77 94 76 63 88 48 82 74 15 102 51 61 87 89 57Heelands 15 19 18 25 37 26 45 52 49 44 57 14 37 56 35 24 69 37 34 14

Hodge Lea 10 5 20 20 26 17 43 38 50 15 17 6 29 47 39 52 5 17 15 47

Kents Hill 51 55 63 28 20 84 64 21 36 66 45 48 60 69 82 12 60 46 32 51

Kingsmead 104 74 93 78 S 58 93 62 60 68 61 89 75 85 86 96 86 90 90 22

Ranks of estates are shownfor each indicator

1 = Most 'diff iculties'

108 = Least 'difficulties'

N/A = Data not available

OR Very small numbers

Top Twenty estates w ith

difficulties are shaded


30/142


Housing/Co

uncilTaxBenefit

FamilyRefe

rrals

FreeSchoo

lMeals

SpecialEdu

cationalNeeds

TeenageConceptions

NotStudentsaged18-24

Pupilsnotg

etting5+A*-CGCSEs

Pupilsnotg

ettingKS2L4+English

NurseryUp

take

DomesticF

ires

NeighbourComplaints

Council&S

ocialRent

ViolentCrim

e

BurglaryDw

elling

CriminalDa

mage

OlderPeopleServices

DisabledConcessionaryFares

DisabledClients

Emergency

Admissions

ACE

Lathbury 105 94 55 92 68 101 1 76 12 88 92 89 103 95 104 5 97 90 7 104

Lavendon 83 42 74 63 68 89 89 76 41 71 81 68 61 81 85 81 54 55 102 5

Leadenhall 28 21 35 34 S 24 1 71 94 33 79 9 2 45 3 78 27 15 10 60

Little Brickhill 61 41 97 1 68 74 N/A 76 7 56 2 33 67 13 78 60 90 47 43 94

Loughton 62 80 92 68 57 91 67 65 68 41 52 49 83 23 84 14 57 59 76 84

Loughton Lodge 108 94 97 92 68 105 N/A N/A 99 88 92 89 103 95 104 96 97 90 103 107

Middleton/Milton Keynes Village 93 61 61 55 52 62 82 59 87 80 50 56 52 77 94 83 84 76 84 99

Monkston 63 53 50 87 47 32 63 54 40 39 46 43 50 55 45 94 81 40 94 69

Monkston Park 74 60 54 73 9 40 34 70 18 85 47 15 66 16 36 96 95 86 93 26

Moulsoe 22 94 49 83 S 53 67 32 3 2 92 19 87 95 53 96 87 70 99 9

Neath Hill 23 33 28 31 S 18 24 38 8 19 23 23 27 40 55 3 28 12 35 40

Netherf ield 2 3 1 9 6 1 14 15 39 5 16 1 6 6 12 11 23 18 13 32

New Bradw ell 14 15 14 18 8 11 12 28 86 24 15 17 12 37 8 37 42 41 19 59

New port Pagnell 65 58 77 69 61 45 57 67 53 50 70 73 65 82 73 29 63 73 64 27

New ton Blossomville 100 46 97 38 S 94 N/A 76 10 88 92 66 97 95 95 39 79 54 105 4

North Craw ley 77 93 91 67 S 41 46 76 99 79 80 74 101 59 90 30 89 71 88 15

Oakhill 96 65 85 91 16 57 75 62 66 12 65 89 3 95 91 96 97 85 49 80

Old Farm Park 60 36 71 75 44 85 86 48 98 64 20 26 51 36 65 82 64 28 92 45

Old Wolverton 72 94 88 59 S 61 89 76 84 88 92 51 14 27 63 71 24 14 1 74

Oldbrook 25 18 21 11 28 28 21 20 38 29 53 30 33 24 46 54 21 39 59 56

Olney 78 86 75 80 67 79 81 75 88 86 89 69 82 58 71 27 85 69 87 18

Oxley Park 98 56 81 61 5 10 56 45 79 67 71 77 40 90 68 96 96 90 80 24

Peartree Bridge 20 9 38 49 34 2 10 76 33 11 4 13 24 5 37 86 14 21 28 64

Pennyland 18 90 25 42 S 38 13 6 37 20 5 21 44 71 32 44 8 8 26 75Ravenstone 89 77 32 92 68 103 94 76 99 88 92 78 103 95 92 20 76 90 101 23

Shenley Brook End 53 25 51 81 60 83 74 57 43 55 63 27 57 84 80 95 70 53 82 67

Shenley Church End 50 71 78 53 63 71 85 40 59 70 74 54 78 66 74 63 65 48 83 61

Shenley Lodge 36 35 44 90 66 73 37 60 85 45 40 20 71 14 30 31 45 25 50 48

Sherington 91 89 95 79 S 97 75 73 27 59 85 57 100 83 100 93 72 90 81 19

Simpson 55 84 13 38 S 37 46 76 12 77 10 37 34 9 25 9 32 60 12 105

Springf ield 17 26 16 33 19 31 25 15 26 40 27 25 28 25 26 72 16 23 16 86

Stacey Bushes 8 14 4 51 13 4 8 12 45 34 36 3 11 59 13 73 2 13 21 29

Stantonbury 13 17 15 12 33 23 33 40 62 22 21 18 16 21 18 28 40 31 20 12

Stoke Goldington 75 91 94 14 68 68 91 76 92 23 92 59 84 88 98 62 38 90 77 3

Stony Stratford 49 79 53 72 65 69 58 32 73 60 67 60 47 44 52 23 29 42 40 101

Tattenhoe 73 31 76 65 51 70 87 65 56 87 68 67 81 87 77 89 56 81 67 35

Tinkers Bridge 3 7 10 6 15 14 41 5 31 21 9 8 8 3 9 55 10 9 11 20

Tw o Mile Ash 52 70 68 57 49 67 67 74 20 62 60 84 56 61 96 70 37 43 63 71

Tyringham & Filgrave 97 49 52 92 S 105 1 76 99 28 92 85 93 95 62 46 97 90 68 21

Walnut Tree 47 59 47 37 32 43 41 23 61 54 43 62 42 31 50 85 51 72 62 53

Walton Park 103 64 90 45 41 99 94 6 54 42 72 89 95 9 103 90 93 19 60 92

Warrington 66 94 97 92 68 96 94 N/A N/A 88 92 89 103 95 4 96 97 90 95 107

Water Eaton 11 6 12 22 22 5 16 27 47 18 26 N/A 19 26 14 21 12 50 14 43

Wavendon 95 87 89 62 68 92 46 76 92 81 41 55 70 63 34 43 68 90 104 2

Wavendon Gate 45 67 42 86 55 42 66 37 69 47 35 47 53 35 79 75 53 67 73 49

West Bletchley 35 34 40 54 12 27 22 58 70 27 32 N/A 25 48 41 36 36 24 27 28

Westcroft 48 12 48 66 42 64 73 36 71 35 25 31 43 67 57 1 77 32 41 62

Weston Underw ood 106 94 72 92 68 102 N/A 76 75 88 92 86 94 95 28 96 97 90 97 89

Willen 86 92 86 30 59 90 84 71 77 75 69 81 58 32 61 42 80 79 79 73

Willen Park 12 88 83 17 S 82 46 76 27 88 91 38 88 51 69 6 6 2 8 78

Woburn Sands 70 73 59 7 S 59 83 6 2 52 58 70 72 53 81 45 47 58 107 36Wolverton 34 47 26 70 27 33 55 25 64 49 28 51 23 49 16 22 34 30 36 93

Woolstone 101 94 96 52 53 100 91 76 96 88 31 87 73 4 97 18 78 66 53 95

Woughton Park 107 94 97 5 68 76 N/A 76 99 88 92 89 103 95 17 88 97 7 48 77

Woughton-on-the-Green 39 94 64 35 68 65 38 3 12 88 84 16 69 7 23 48 44 84 70 103

Ranks of estates are show n

for each indicator

1 = Most 'diff iculties'

108 = Least 'difficulties'

N/A = Data not available

OR Very small numbers

Top Twenty estates w ith

difficulties are s haded


31/142


ESTATE SUMMARY OF INDICATORS TRENDS

Name Hous

ing

/Counc

ilTax

Bene

fit

Fam

ilyRe

ferra

ls

Free

Sc

hoo

lMea

ls

Spec

ialEducat

iona

lNee

ds

No

tStuden

ts1

8-2

4

Pup

ilsno

tge

tting

5+A*-C

GCSEs

Domes

tic

Fires

Ne

ighbour

Com

plaints

Violen

tCrime

Burg

lary

Dwell

ing

Crim

ina

lDamage

Older

Peop

leS

erv

ices

Clien

ts

Disa

bledConcess

ionary

Fares

Disa

bledClient

s

Emergency

Ad

miss

ions

Ashland

Astw ood Bancroft Bancroft Park Beanhill Blakelands Blue Bridge Bolbeck Park Bow Brickhill Bradville Bradw ell Bradw ell Common Brickfields Broughton & Atterbury Browns Wood Caldecotte Calverton Campbell Park Castlethorpe Central Bletchley Central Milton Keynes

Chicheley

Clifton Reynes Coffee Hall Cold Brayfield Conniburrow Crownhill Denbigh East Downhead Park Dow ns Barn Eaglestone Emberton Emerson Valley Far Bletchley

Fenny Stratford

Fishermead Fullers Slade Furzton Galley Hill Gayhurst Giffard Park Granby Great Holm Great Linford Greenleys Hanslope Hardmead Haversham/Little Linford Heelands Hodge Lea Kents Hill Kingsmead

Stayed the same (+10%) Improved, gone down Got worse, increased Zero or very small values


32/142


Name Housing/CouncilTaxBenefit

F

amilyReferrals

F

reeSchoolMeals

S

pecialEducationalNeeds

N

otStudents18-24

P

upilsnotgetting5+A*-CGCSEs

D

omesticFires

N

eighbourComplaints

V

iolentCrime

B

urglaryDwelling

C

riminalDamage

O

lderPeopleServicesClients

D

isabledConcessionaryFares

D

isabledClients

E

mergencyAdmissions

Lathbury Lavendon Leadenhall Little Brickhill Loughton Loughton Lodge Middleton/Milton Keynes Village Monkston Monkston Park Moulsoe Neath Hill Netherfield

New Bradw ell

Newport Pagnell New ton Blossomville North Craw ley Oakhill Old Farm Park Old Wolverton Oldbrook Olney Oxley Park Peartree Bridge Pennyland Ravenstone Shenley Brook End Shenley Church End Shenley Lodge Sherington Simpson Springfield Stacey Bushes Stantonbury Stoke Goldington Stony Stratford Tattenhoe Tinkers Bridge Two Mile Ash Tyringham & Filgrave Walnut Tree Walton Park Warrington Water Eaton Wavendon Wavendon Gate West Bletchley Westcroft Weston Underw ood Willen Willen Park Woburn Sands Wolverton Woolstone Woughton Park Woughton-on-the-Green Milton Keynes

Stayed the same (+10%) Improved, gone down Got worse, increased Zero or very small values


33/142

Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2009/10


2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

INCOME42 N/A Housing/Council Tax Benefit June 2010 217.2 91.5


37 N/A Family Referrals 2009-10 23.3 84.6

19 N/A Nursery Place Non-uptake 2010 463.4 164.2

67 N/A Free School Meals March 2010 57.1 45.6

92 N/A Special Educational Needs March 2010 0.0 0.0

76 N/A Below KS2 L4+ English 2009 0.0 0.0

1 N/A Below 5+ A*-C Maths & English GCSE's 2009 1000.0 191.7

105 N/A 18-25 WITHOUT Student Awards Sep 2009 0.0 0.0

OLDER PEOPLE

96 N/A Clients of Older People Services 2009/10 0.0 0.0

COMMUNITY FACTORS

88 N/A Domestic Fires 2004/9 0.0 0.0

26 N/A Violence Against Person 2009/10 23.9 93.4

46 N/A Burglary Dwellings 2009/10 11.6 97.1

29 N/A Criminal Damage 2009/10 18.6 111.5

53 N/A Council & Social Rented Housing March 2010 126.3 66.2

73 N/A Neighbour Complaints 2009/10 11.6 33.9

8 N/A Adult Continuing Education Students 2009/10 989.4 101.1



48 N/A Disabled Concessionary Fares August 2010 10.6 91.2

90 N/A Clients of Disabled Services 2009/10 0.0 0.0

72 N/A Emergency Hospital Admissions 2008/10 83.1 82.0

96 N/A Non Emergency Hospital Admissions 2008/10 61.5 49.3

44 N/A Accident and Emergency Attendance 2008/10 235.4 100.0

RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

1 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 192.7 271.2

104 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 54.5 38.24 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 640.0 126.4

101 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 109.1 52.6

107 Aged 70+ - 2009 3.6 5.0

5 Non White British Pupils 2010 571.4 169.4

N/A 16-74 Year Olds with No Qualifications N/A N/A

N/A 16-74 Year Olds with Qualifications Below Level 3 N/A N/A

N/A Children in Workless Households N/A N/A

N/A Population with Limiting Long Term Illness N/A N/A

32

2001 Census

Ashland Social Atlas Rank = 51IMD Rank = N/A

Demography


34/142



2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

INCOME99 98 Housing/Council Tax Benefit June 2010 53.3 22.5









OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

3 7 Domestic Fires 2004/9 27.4 330.2



104 58 Criminal Damage 2009/10 0.0 0.0





68 47 Teenage Conceptions Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 0.0 0.0






RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

70 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 57.3 80.6

43 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 140.6 98.672 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 453.1 89.5

35 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 276.0 133.0

55 Aged 70+ - 2009 72.9 100.7


17 16-74 Year Olds with No Qualifications 309.7 127.1

75 16-74 Year Olds with Qualifications Below Level 3 574.2 86.2

35 Children in Workless Households 142.9 106.8

18 Population with Limiting Long Term Illness 176.5 125.5

33

2001 Census

ASTWOOD Social Atlas Rank = 86IMD Rank = 46

Demography


35/142



2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100










OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

31 25 Domestic Fires 2004/9 9.6 116.2



99 79 Criminal Damage 2009/10 3.3 20.0





S 47 Teenage Conceptions Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 S S






RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

89 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 45.8 64.4

81 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 113.4 79.584 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 421.4 83.2

14 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 330.9 159.4

43 Aged 70+ - 2009 88.4 122.2






34


IMD Rank = 76

Demography

2001 Census

BANCROFT


36/142



2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100










OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

88 91 Domestic Fires 2004/9 0.0 0.0



60 92 Criminal Damage 2009/10 10.5 62.8





S S Teenage Conceptions Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 S S






RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

78 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 51.6 72.6

98 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 74.2 52.043 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 509.7 100.7

31 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 287.1 138.3

50 Aged 70+ - 2009 77.4 106.9






35


IMD Rank = 43

Demography

2001 Census

BANCROFT PARK


37/142


Population June 09 = 2,000

2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100










OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

13 16 Domestic Fires 2004/9 16.0 193.2



11 8 Criminal Damage 2009/10 32.7 195.8











RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

51 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 65.3 91.9

34 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 148.7 104.365 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 474.1 93.6

55 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 231.2 111.4

47 Aged 70+ - 2009 80.6 111.4






36


IMD Rank = 2

Demography

2001 Census

BEANHILL


38/142



2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100










OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

88 91 Domestic Fires 2004/9 0.0 0.0



49 41 Criminal Damage 2009/10 12.6 75.4





50 S Teenage Conceptions Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 43.8 70.7






RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

86 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 47.0 66.1

87 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 104.8 73.562 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 480.9 95.0

36 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 274.2 132.1

41 Aged 70+ - 2009 93.0 128.5






37


IMD Rank = 107

Demography

2001 Census

BLAKELANDS


39/142



2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100










OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

72 76 Domestic Fires 2004/9 3.6 43.5



64 87 Criminal Damage 2009/10 9.9 59.1











RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

85 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 47.6 67.0

102 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 64.1 44.977 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 445.1 87.9

12 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 333.3 160.6

30 Aged 70+ - 2009 109.9 151.8






38


IMD Rank = 90

Demography

2001 Census

BLUE BRIDGE


40/142



2010Rank

(of 109)

2009Rank


per 1000

Index Value

MK=100










OLDER PEOPLE


COMMUNITY FACTORS

26 23 Domestic Fires 2004/9 10.3 123.6



56 90 Criminal Damage 2009/10 11.7 70.1











RankValue

per 1000

Index Value

MK=100

99 Aged 0 to 4 - 2009 33.9 47.7

80 Aged 5 to 15 - 2009 114.9 80.575 Aged 16 to 49 - 2009 446.4 88.2

38 Aged 50 to 69 - 2009 270.2 130.2

17 Aged 70+ - 2009 134.6 185.9


50 16-74 Year Olds with No

social atlas 2010

Documents