snr-qso with espadons: tests, impacts, and...

7
SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibility Claire Moutou, January 27 2016, update August 18 2016 The scope of the document is to review the tests of the SNR-QSO mode with ESPaDOnS (ESP) in January 2016, to review applicability for this mode as well as follow up on its performance on subsequent 2016 data. 1. Preliminary notes In January 2016, the ESP control commands were modified in order to take into account a goal SNR and to stop the exposure once the SNR calculated by the exposuremeter has achieved the requested goal. The exposuremeter SNR value is calculated from the received flux per second and calibrated into SNR at 730nm; this calibration includes a necessary correction for the spectrograph (air) temperature, (see sec. 5). The transmission evolution due to mirror degradation with time from aluminization is not taken into account, as for the ETC. Note that for exposure times <15s, the SNR from the exposuremeter is less accurate and underestimates the real SNR –this should not be used directly to avoid saturating spectra. In Polar mode, each exposure of a sequence is treated independently and thus the 4 exposure times have different exposure times. Changing the individual exposure times in a polar sequence has an effect on the heliocentric correction of each exposure, and thus, on the final velocity profile of the spectrum. At the very small levels of polarization that ESP records, this impact can create an unwanted spectral shift and spurious polarization detections. The main goal of the tests done in January was to quantify this impact. 2. Test description The first test (Jan 22, 2016) showed that the ‘go’ command executes as expected, in both modes: when the SNR goal is not achieved before the time set in the Instrument configuration, then the exposure stops normally at this value; otherwise it stops at the goal SNR value. In Polar mode, the four exposures have slightly different exposure times, and we verified that this does not cause any problem for the quicklook nor the pipeline. The second test was to insert a SNR-mode flag in PH2, and copy the SNR goal given in PH2 into the ‘go’ command. This was executed successfully on Jan 25, 2016. The third test (jan 25 and 26) was to evaluate the limits where SNR mode should be applied. We compare these spectra with the same star observed with same exposure times and varying SNR and with similar exp times and SNRs. To mimic the change of exposure time in a polarimetric sequence, we defocused the telescope during a

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

SNR-QSOwithESPaDOnS:Tests,impacts,andfeasibilityClaireMoutou,January272016,updateAugust182016The scope of the document is to review the tests of the SNR-QSO mode withESPaDOnS (ESP) in January2016, to reviewapplicability for thismodeaswell asfollowuponitsperformanceonsubsequent2016data.

1. PreliminarynotesIn January 2016, the ESP control commandsweremodified in order to take intoaccount a goal SNR and to stop the exposure once the SNR calculated by theexposuremeter has achieved the requested goal. The exposuremeter SNR value iscalculatedfromthereceivedfluxpersecondandcalibratedintoSNRat730nm;thiscalibrationincludesanecessarycorrectionforthespectrograph(air)temperature,(seesec.5).Thetransmissionevolutionduetomirrordegradationwithtimefromaluminizationisnottakenintoaccount,asfortheETC.Notethatforexposuretimes<15s,theSNRfromtheexposuremeterislessaccurateand underestimates the real SNR –this should not be used directly to avoidsaturatingspectra.InPolarmode,eachexposureofasequenceistreatedindependentlyandthusthe4exposuretimeshavedifferentexposuretimes.Changingtheindividualexposuretimes in a polar sequence has an effect on the heliocentric correction of eachexposure,and thus,on the finalvelocityprofileof thespectrum.At theverysmalllevelsofpolarizationthatESPrecords,thisimpactcancreateanunwantedspectralshift and spurious polarization detections. The main goal of the tests done inJanuarywastoquantifythisimpact.

2. TestdescriptionThefirsttest(Jan22,2016)showedthatthe‘go’commandexecutesasexpected,inboth modes: when the SNR goal is not achieved before the time set in theInstrumentconfiguration,thentheexposurestopsnormallyatthisvalue;otherwiseit stops at the goal SNR value. In Polar mode, the four exposures have slightlydifferentexposuretimes,andweverifiedthatthisdoesnotcauseanyproblemforthequicklooknorthepipeline.ThesecondtestwastoinsertaSNR-modeflaginPH2,andcopytheSNRgoalgiveninPH2intothe‘go’command.ThiswasexecutedsuccessfullyonJan25,2016.Thethirdtest(jan25and26)wastoevaluatethelimitswhereSNRmodeshouldbeapplied.WecomparethesespectrawiththesamestarobservedwithsameexposuretimesandvaryingSNRandwithsimilarexptimesandSNRs.Tomimicthechangeofexposure time in a polarimetric sequence, we defocused the telescope during a

Page 2: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

polarizationsequenceinSNRmode,inordertohaveequalSNRacrossthesequenceanddifferentexposuretimes.

3. ResultsJan25testID-OG#odometer

Texpmax[s]

SNRgoal Exp1 Exp2 Exp3 Exp4 Comments

E93-131889425p

60 950 Ef50740SNR695Texp60

Ef48440SNR683Texp60

Ef48324SNR676Texp60

Ef51111SNR695Texp60

Reference0SNRgoalnotachieved

E97-31889429p

45 - Ef49047SNR599Texp45

Ef50848SNR602Texp45

Ef49855SNR597Texp45

Ef50092SNR598Texp5

Reference1noSNRgoal

E93-151889441p

60 500 Ef52221SNR501Texp32.4

Ef43292SNR501Texp37.0

Ef22723SNR467Texp60

Ef4094SNR258Texp60

SNR-modewithdefocus

Foreachspectrum,themeanstellar(LSD)profilewascalculated.Inred,theSNR-modeprofileminustheReference0profile.Inwhite,forcomparison,asubtractionoftheprofilesofbothreferencespectra.Left:intensity,right:polarizationStokesV.Theplotshavebeenshiftedforclarity.Notethescale:welookatthe10-4level!ConclusionofJan25:Whenthefluxvariationsareextreme(facteur~15)duringapolarsequence,spurioussignalsareindeedproduced.Moredatawithmildervariationsareneeded.ASNR-modesequencew/ofluxvariationsisalsomissing.

Reference0-SNRmodewithextremefluxvariations

Reference0–Reference1

Page 3: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

Jan26testID-OG#odometer

Texpmax[s]

SNRgoal Exp1 Exp2 Exp3 Exp4 Comments

E93-21889635p set1

180 300 Ef8358SNR300Texp67.5

Ef8301SNR303Texp69

Ef8370SNR300Texp68.1

Ef8516SNR301Texp66.8

SNRmodenormal3%varetime

E93-21889639p set2

180 300 Ef9118SNR301Texp62.5

Ef9012SNR302Texp63.8

Ef8581SNR301Texp65.2

Ef8697SNR304Texp65.6

SNRmode5%varetime

E93-21889643p set3

180 300 Ef8208SNR303Texp70.5

Ef8710SNR300Texp65.2

Ef9340SNR302Texp61.3

Ef8709SNR302Texp64.3

SNRmode14%varetime

E93-21889647p set4

180 300 Ef6919SNR301Texp82.3

Ef8390SNR300Texp67.8

Ef5812SNR301Texp96.4

Ef7824SNR301Texp73.1

SNRmode35%varetime

E93-21889651p set5

180 300 Ef7326SNR301Texp77.2

Ef8418SNR300Texp67.7

Ef5904SNR301Texp96.6

Ef7408SNR301Texp77.2

SNRmode35%varetime

E93-21889655p set6

180 300 Ef8606SNR302Texp66.1

Ef8943SNR300Texp63.4

Ef8636SNR302Texp66.6

Ef7857SNR301Texp71.9

SNRmode17%varetime

E93-21889659p set7

180 300 Ef7950SNR301Texp69.9

Ef7720SNR301Texp74

Ef8539SNR301Texp65.8

Ef7718SNR301Texp73.6

SNRmode11%varetime

E93-161889663p set8

180 - Ef8464SNR499Texp180

Ef7934SNR482Texp180

Ef8572SNR502Texp180

Ef8565SNR502Texp180

Etimemodereference

Exposuremeterplotsoftheflux/secondforset4(above)andreferenceset8(below).

Page 4: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

ComparisonofintensityandpolarLSDprofilesforset1(SNRmodeinstableconditions),set4(SNRmodeinvariableconditions)andset8(etimemode).Nospuriousdetectioninpolarisseen.Smalldepthdifferencesinintensityspectra,probablyduetothedifferenceofSNRbetweenset8(~500)andothers(~300).Noneofthesetswithmodifiedfluxwithinthesequenceproducesaspurioussignalinpolarization.Thereisalwaysasmalldifferenceinintensityprofiledepth,butthishasnoconsequence.Conclusion:evenwith35%variationsinthefluxandexposuretimesduringapolarizationsequence,thereisnoappearanceofspuriouspolarsignals.ItisveryencouragingandmeanswecansafelyusetheSNRmodeinmostclearconditions,whenfluxvariationsonlyarisefromtheunavoidablecenteringand/orslightturbulencefluctuations.IwouldnotrecommendusingSNRmodeinpolarwhenfluxvariationsarelargerthan~30%overthesequence,tobesafe.

4. ApplicabilityandlimitsofESPSNR-QSO

- SNR-QSOmodecanalwaysbeappliedinStar+SkyandStar-Onlymodes,aslongasaSNRgoalisgivenbythePI.Thiscouldbethedefaultmodeinspectroscopy.Onecaveatisthecaseofvariablestars,orstarsofill-knowntemperatures,forwhichitwouldbebettertoslightlyincreaseratherthandecreasethee-timeinrealtime.ThesecasesarenotdealtwithinthecurrentsoftwareandweshouldurgePIstoputsomemargin(ie,higherSNRgoals)iftheyhavedoubts.

- SNR-QSOcanbeused(ascoded,with4differentexposuretimes)inthePolarmodewhenconditionsareclearandforcertaintypesofstars.

- Unsuitablestarsmaybespectroscopicbinaries,fastrotators,extremevariables.SothePIshouldhavethepossibilitytooptoutofSNRmode.

set1-set8:SNRmodecomparedtoetimemodeset4-set8:SNRmodewith35%etime/fluxvariationscomparedtoetimemode

Page 5: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

- UnsuitableconditionsforSNRmodeincludecloudynightswherethefluxmayvarybyafactor>1.3duringasequence.Thesemaybebaddataanywayforspectropolarimetrysincethephotocenterofexposuresvaries.

- TheuseofSNRQSOisthusacombinationofPIoptionandskyconditions.Itshouldbepossiblefortheobserver(orthesoftware)tobypassthePIwillingnesstouseSNRmodeifconditionsarenotgoodenough,resultinginverydifferentexposuretimesinapolarsequence.WeshouldavoidsituationswheresomeexposuresofapolarsequencearestoppedbyetimeandothersbySNR.

- EnforcingtheuseoftheSNRmodeshouldbedoneatPH2level,sinceweneedpreciseinformation.Requiredparametersare:magnitude,Teff(FT),SNRgoal(OB),maximumexposuretimeperexposure(inIC).DefaultvaluescanbechosenforSNR_wave,IQlimit(verylargeimpact),Airmasslimit(verylowimpact),extinctionlimit(verylargeimpact),sincewetryobservinginanyconditionswithESP.Weneedtochecktheconsistencyofthesenumbersbeforehand,forinstancewhensavingtheOBsortheOGsandwithawebapplication.

- Technicalimplication:weneedamechanismtoconstantlyvalidatetheexposuremetercalibrationforSNR.Itcanbedonedailyoncalibrations,whentheexposuretimeexceeds15s.Ifpossible,theopticalalignmentoftheexposuremetershouldnotbetouched.

5. Exposuremetercalibration(update)

Verificationoftheexposuremetercalibrationanditsdependencywiththetemperatureinthespectrograph.SNRmeasuredbythepipelineat730nmasafunctionoftheSNRcalculatedinrealtimebytheexposuremeter,inpolarmode.Inwhite,alldatafrom2015whenexposuretimeis>10s.Inred,themostrecentdata,fromDecember2015toJanuary2016.Ontheright,alineardependencywithESPtemperatureiscorrectedforandthescatterisreduced.Thereisnotemperaturedependencyinthespectroscopicmode.

Page 6: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

Itseemsthetemperaturecorrectioncouldbeadjusted–stillsomescatterinhighSNRregime.MostrecentdatamayrepresentdifferentthermalconditionssincetheinstallationoftheGRACESwalls,whichcouldexplaintheneedfora(minor)adjustment.TheSNRcalculatedforthelongcomparisonexposuresdoneeachdayofanESPrunatleastoncecanbeusedtocheckthereliabilityoftheexposuremeteralignment,especiallyincasesomethingismovedinsidethespectrograph.SNR_expo=705+-20inpolarmodeon60sHCexposuresSNR_expo=570+-20inspectro-SSmodeon60sHCexposuresTheplotbelowshowsthebehaviorofthisSNRasafunctionoftemperature[valuesbetween16-17ocorrespondtotherunQ13-Nov23toDec03,temperaturemainlydecreasingduringtherun;valuesbetween13-15ocorrespondtotheJanuary2016run,temperatureincreasingduringtherun].Thereisnoobvioustrendwiththisparameter.

Conclusion:theSNRmeasuredbytheexposuremeterdailyduringarunarefairlystableandcanbeusedtocheckthevalidityoftheexposuremeterpositionandcalibration.Ifmoreprecisionisneeded,aprocedureinvolvingtheflatfieldlampandexposures>15scouldbeputinplace,withafrequentmonitoring.Thatmaynotbeneeded,butweneedtokeepaneyeonthecomparison60sexposureduringrunsandatcheckout.IfSNRdropsto<500(polar)or<350(spectro),egthefluxdropsbyafactor2,awarningshouldbesenttotheRemoteObserverandSNR-QSOshouldbeputonholduntilitisinvestigated.

Page 7: SNR-QSO with ESPaDOnS: Tests, impacts, and feasibilitycfht.hawaii.edu/.../QSO/QSOSNR/SNR_ESP_Aug2016_web.pdf · 2016-08-18 · between 16-17o correspond to the run Q13-Nov23 to Dec03,

6. ReportonSNRmodeperformancefromFeb2016tomidAugust2016Timegain:16A11.5h,16B5.7h/16A391h,16B95.97hrequested(3%,6%)TimegainonprogramsthatrequestedSNRmode:-inPOL:16A5.3h,16B1.8h/16A11.7h,16B7.87hvalidated(45%,23%)-inS+S:16A5.8h,16B3.2h/16A11.6h,16B10.74hvalidated(50%,30%)ComparisonoftherequestedandmeasuredSNR:top)atthewavelengthrequestedbythePI,andcomparedtotheLEpipelinemeasurement,bottom)atthedefaultwavelength(730nm)andcomparedtotheexposuremeterSNRestimate(alignedbyconstruction).Thegreenandredlinesshow20%variationinSNR.Onlyvalidatedexposuresareshown.

Diamonds=polarmodeCrosses=Star+Skyspectro

16B

16B

16A

16A