snap count results wave 2 - safely home · 2016-06-13 · snap count results – wave 2 13 may 2016...
TRANSCRIPT
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Snap Count results – wave 2 13 May 2016
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
1 Research approach
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Background and methodology
The Western Cape Government launched a seatbelt campaign on 18 March 2016 as part of their Safely Home initiative and required a pre-campaign benchmark that would assess current levels of compliance with seatbelt usage, in order to compare and track any shifts in compliance post campaign exposure. This report details the 2nd wave of counts.
We conducted observations at the same 4 intersections in Cape Town, where details for every occupant within each vehicle was captured and seatbelt usage was counted.
1. CBD: Christiaan Barnard and Hertzog Boulevard
2. Mitchell’s Plain: Spine Rd and AZ Berman
3. Khayelitsha: Spine Rd and Govan Mbeki
4. Northern Suburbs: Voortrekker Rd and De La Rey
1,226 vehicles were counted in total equating to 2,399 occupants (drivers and any passengers)
The observations were done on 3 May 2016, during two time slots:
AM: 07:30 – 09:00 | PM: 16:00 – 17:30
3
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Note: the following icons and definitions have been used in this report
• Small child – estimated to be younger than 6 years i.e. baby, toddler, pre-schooler.
• Older child – estimated to be 6 years or older i.e. school-going children.
• Adult – estimated to be 18 years or older
• Sedan/Hatch – a passenger vehicle with two or four doors with or without an extended boot e.g. VW Golf, BMW 3 series, Toyota Corolla or Tazz
• SUV/4x4 – a large passenger car that is equipped with four-wheel drive for on- or off-road ability e.g. Land Rover, Toyota Fortuner, Kia Sportage
• Minivan/Combi – a small passenger van used to transport people for private use, NOT a minibus taxi e.g. VW Caravelle, Mercedes Vito
• Minibus taxi – a passenger carrying public transport vehicle
• Metered taxi – private public transport vehicle, easily identifiable by the taxi sign on the roof
• Bus – public transport vehicle including Golden Arrow and MyCiti, Jammie Shuttle
• Van – a light delivery vehicle, typically covered and without side windows, used for transporting goods
• Lorry/Truck – large delivery vehicles that transport heavy goods
• Single cab bakkie – no back seats with a canopy at the back (open or closed)
• Double cab bakkie – has a row of back seats with a canopy at the back (open or closed)
Passenger types Vehicle types
4
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Note: certain information was captured for different vehicle types as shown here. Therefore measures are only reported where applicable
Sedan/ Hatch
SUV/ 4x4
Minivan/Combi
Minibus taxi
Metered taxi
Bus Van Lorry/ Truck
Single cab
bakkie
Double cab
bakkie
Driver
Front passenger
Back passenger
Back section
Open/closed canopy
5
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
2 Profile of vehicles counted
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Majority of the cars counted were Sedans/Hatches. More than half of all cars had passengers, mostly adult
No. of cars going through each intersection
CBD n=308
Khayelitsha n=305
Mitchell’s Plain n=310
Northern Suburbs n=303
Types of cars going through each intersection
61
10
7
6
5
4
3
3
2
1
54
4
24
3
4
3
2
2
4
0
54
2
12
13
6
3
3
4
4
1
69
6
2
1
4
8
2
5
2
1
Profile of vehicles counted
41% Driver only 59% Any passengers*
2% Child passengers only
13% Mix of adult & child passengers
85% Adult passengers only
* Excludes back of bakkie passengers
7
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Types of passengers across vehicle types
100 100 97 96 92 82 82 78 74
3 1
7 1 9
9
4 7 11 17 13 18
Lorry/
Truck
Metered
Taxi
Single
Cab
Van Minibus
Taxi
Minivan/
Combi
Sedan/
Hatch
Double
cab
SUV/
4x4
Mix
Child only
Adult only
8
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
3 Overall compliance
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
68 81
31
67 46
60 47
58
32 53
25
49
11 32
20 31
18 16 23 9
32 19
69
33 54
40 53
42
68 47
75
51
89 68
80 69
82 84 77 91
SUV/ 4x4 Double CabMetered TaxiSedan/ Hatch Van Single Cab Lorry/ TruckMinivan/ Combi Bus Minibus Taxi
No. wearing seatbelts (W1) No. not wearing seatbelts (W1)
30
30
26
42
56
66
51
72
70
70
74
56
44
34
49
26
W1
W2
W1
W2
W1
W2
W1
W2
51% of all vehicle
occupants are compliant in Wave 2 Mitchell’s
Plain
Khayelitsha
Northern suburbs
CBD
Overall compliance has significantly improved, with just over half of all vehicle occupants wearing a seatbelt. Compliance in Khayelitsha and Mitchell’s Plain remain comparatively lower
40%
51%
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
No. wearing seatbelts (W2) No. not wearing seatbelts (W2)
Per vehicle type
Per intersection
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance
10
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
4 Occupant compliance
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
78 91
41
76 60
68
44 57
32
53
33 46 39 37
17 24 18 16 31
11
22 9
59
24 40
32
56 43
68
47
67 54 61 63
83 76 82 84 69
89
Driver compliance has significantly improved, again showing the highest compliance of all vehicle occupants
Driver compliance per vehicle type
56%
50% 56%
of all drivers are compliant in Wave 2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
No. wearing seatbelts (W2) No. not wearing seatbelts (W2) No. wearing seatbelts (W1) No. not wearing seatbelts (W1)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance
12
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
72 71 40
70 43 61
30 58 67 50
18 46
5 40
9 26 16 7
67 83
50 0 40 17
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
67
7 0
0
100
0 0
22 33
0
100
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 33
0
100
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
SUV/ 4x4 Double Cab Sedan/ Hatch Van Metered Taxi Single Cab Lorry/ Truck Minivan/ Combi Minibus Taxi
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
Just under half of front passengers were wearing a seatbelt this wave. This is a significant improvement on Wave 1 compliance
Front passengers wearing seatbelts per vehicle type
48%
32%
48% of all front seat passengers
are compliant in Wave 2
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance
13
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Almost all front seat passengers were adults
Profile of front passengers Types of front passengers per vehicle type
Adult 96% 100% 100% 88% 90% 97% 95% 82% 97%
Small child 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 3% 3%
Older child 0% 0% 0% 12% 10% 1% 5% 16% 0%
95%
1%
4%
14
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
32
67
9 26 36
0
100
0 17
31
7
28
100 0
40
50 33
21
35
0 0
13 67
43
0 0 0
SUV/ 4x4 Sedan/
Hatch
Double Cab Metered
Taxi
Minivan/
Combi
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
While back passengers still show the poorest compliance of all occupants, it boasts the largest improvement – more than doubling seatbelt wearing wave-on-wave
Back passenger compliance per vehicle type
34%
13%
34% of all back seat passengers
are compliant in Wave 2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance
15
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
While many back seat passengers were adults, a third were children
Profile of back passengers Types of back passengers per vehicle type
Adult 74% 100% 64% 68% 75%
Small child 0% 0% 0% 7% 13%
Older child 26% 0% 36% 24% 13%
69%
7%
24%
16
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Presence of back passengers per vehicle type
36
64
Open
Closed
Again, two-thirds of canopies (back sections) were closed, making it difficult to observe if there were passengers inside. Less than 10% were seen to have passengers in this section in Wave 2
21
79
Yes
No
98 95 80
94 75
93 74 86
2 5 20
6 25
7 26 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
80 75 56
68 73 66 66 54
20 25 44
32 27 34 34 46
Van Single Cab Double Cab Lorry/Truck
Presence of back passengers
Open vs. closed canopies Canopy types per vehicle
8
92
34
66
W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2
Note: data ranked on W2
17
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
5 Occupant compliance per intersection
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
86 100
76 79
48
78
33
64 57 60
37 57 50 50
38 17
32 36 19
14 24 21
52
22
67
36 43 40
63 43 50 50
100
62 83
68 64 81
Yes (W1) No (W1)
84 91
68 73
50 63
50 53 32
53
31 50
40 50
33 17
32 25 17
16 9
32 27
50 37
50 47 68
47
69 50
100
60 50
67 83
68 83 83
Yes (W1) No (W1) Yes (W2) No (W2) Overall
Driver
66% (56%)
71% (62%)
CBD compliance
Yes (W2) No (W2)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
19
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
CBD compliance
Front passengers
Back passengers
90 89 58 69
29 50
0 50
0 50
30 33 67
25 7 13
67
0
100
0 0
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
57% (45%)
47% (22%)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
100 60
0 50 8 32 0 0
0
0 50
100
100
100
0
0
67
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
(none counted)
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
20
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
100 100 83 77 83
70 74 55
67 51
62 53 50 43 48
30 40
100
33
0 0 17 23 17
30 26 45
33 49
38 47 50 57 52
70 60
0
67
Yes (W1) No (W1) Yes (W2) No (W2)
Northern Suburbs compliance
46
100
68 81
58 74
40
73
33
73
40
65
40
62
17
58
33 54
100
33
54
32 19
42 26
60
27
67
27
60
35
60
38
83
42
67 46
67
Yes (W1) No (W1)Overall
Driver
72% (50%)
69% (63%)
Yes (W2) No (W2)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
21
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
Northern Suburbs compliance Front passengers
Back passengers
100
24 89
50 83 59 80
33 78 67 78
5 71
0 60
19 43
100 40
100 100 100
50 100
0
50
100
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
0 0 0 0 36
100 75
21 66
0 0
67
0
13
0
60
0
44 0
20 100
0 50
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
79% (37%)
61% (28%)
(none counted)
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
22
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Khayelitsha compliance
49 66
37 41 23
39 38
10 29
11 25
13 22 20
7 14 4 0
51 34
63 59 77
61
100
62
90 71
89 75
87 78 80
93 86 96 100
Yes (W1) No (W1)
Overall
70
92
50
83
56 60
13
46 45
20 38 38
20 17 15 7 0
30
8
50
17
44 40
87
54
100
55
80 62
100
62 80 83 85 93 100
Yes (W1) No (W1)
Driver
30% (30%)
46% (43%)
Yes (W2) No (W2)
Yes (W2) No (W2)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
(none counted)
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
23
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
25 50 57 44 28 35 33 33 13 15 16 3 20 0 0 0 0
0
100
33 0 0 0
100
0
0 0%
0
0
0 0
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
Khayelitsha compliance
Front passengers
Back passengers
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
0 0 0
100
0
0
0
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
21% (22%)
1% (5%)
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
24
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Mitchell’s Plain compliance
21
95
0
80
30
79
33 49
4
48 31
13 18 30
6 14 3 0 0
79
5
100
20
70
21
67 51
96
52 69
87 82 70
94 86 97 100 100
Yes (W1) No (W1)Overall
24
88
33
67
41 58 50
7
47
25 30
6 14 0 0
76
12
67
33
59 42
100
50
93
53
75 70
94 86 97
71
100 100 100
Yes (W1) No (W1)
Driver
42% (26%)
39% (32%)
Yes (W2) No (W2)
Yes (W2) No (W2)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
(none counted)
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
25
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Mitchell’s Plain compliance
Front passengers
Back passengers
50
100 100 67 75
37 62
0 50 40 33 6 0 0 0
0
0
29
50
0
33
0
67
25
25
0
0
25
0
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
48% (27%)
38% (5%)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
0
100 100
0
100
5 23 0 0
100
0 3
31
0
80
100
18
31
0
0
38
Adult Older Child Small Child (car seat) Small Child (seatbelt)
W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2 W1 W2
(none counted)
Note: data ranked on W2 compliance (%) = wave 1 figures
26
3.14 X AXIS
6.65 BASE MARGIN
5.95 TOP MARGIN
4.52 CHART TOP
11.90 LEFT MARGIN
11.90 RIGHT MARGIN DO NOT ALTER SLIDE MASTERS – THIS IS A TNS APPROVED TEMPLATE
© TNS
Snap Count results – wave 2 13 May 2016