smart top drive automation improves drilling performance ... · oscillation improves slide drilling...
TRANSCRIPT
Smart Top Drive AutomationImproves Drilling Performance andPrevents Downhole Tool Failures
IADC Southern Arabian Peninsula Chapter
February 15th, 2018
Top Drive AutomationOvercoming Inefficiencies Through Scalable Technology
2
Performance Limiters Cost-Efficiency Challenges
SolutionROCKit® REVit™
Inefficient weight transfer when slide drilling
Rotary steerable failures caused by stick slip
Additional mud lubricants to improve sliding
MWD / Bit damage from stick slip
Lower ROP when slide drilling
Decreased ROP from damage to cutting structure
Tool face orientation time (invisible NPT)
Oscillation Improves Slide DrillingReduces Drag and Increases ROP
3
• Patented technology for oscillating drill pipe based on quill position
• Oscillations reduce friction along wellbore to improve weight transfer
• Oscillation regime can be adjusted to provide maximum drill sting
rotation without affecting toolface orientation
• Increases ROP when sliding
Case Study: West Texas (2016)Effect of Oscillation on ROP and WOB Transfer Efficiency
5
• 85% Faster Slide ROP
• Increased WOB transfer
efficiency
41% higher Diff. Press. with
50% less weight from
surface
Case Study: Barnett Shale (SPE/IADC 118656)Increase Sliding ROP
6
Increased sliding ROP in lateral by 100%
Accurate Position ControlReduce Flat Time While Setting Toolface and Steering
7
• Quickly orient toolface prior to sliding
• Fine steering adjustments from HMI without picking up off bottom
• Maintain toolface across connections330°
300°
240°
210° 150°
120°
60°
30°
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Autonomous Slide with PLC
control from 9521-9541 ft MD with
advisory tolface set to 30 degrees
Inclination ~40 degrees
Each dot is one MWD toolface
reading. Red dots show a steering
move, blue dots are largely within
tolerance
Case Study: Barnett Shale (SPE/IADC 118656)Aggregate Time Savings
8
Eliminated 3 days from drilling program
Case Study: Middle EastUnderstanding Efficiency Gains
9
8 3/8” Curve Section
Average Slide ROP -ROCKit® Off 15 ft/hr
Average Slide ROP -ROCKit® On 17 ft/hr
Drilling Time Savings 5 hrs
# of Tool Face Orientations 70
Time Savings Per Orientation 10 min
Orientation Time Savings 11.7 hrs
SECTION TIME SAVINGS 16.7 hrs
5 7/8” Lateral Drain
Average Slide ROP -ROCKit® Off 7 ft/hr
Average Slide ROP -ROCKit® On 10 ft/hr
Drilling Time Savings 19.2 hrs
# of Tool Face Orientations 27
Time Savings Per Orientation 10 min
Orientation Time Savings 4.5 hrs
SECTION TIME SAVINGS 23.7 hrs
TOTAL TIME SAVINGS 40.4 hrs
Top Drive Stick Slip MitigationOperating Principle
10
• Soft Torque Rotary System implementation
• Torque maxima correspond to speed minima and vice-versa.
Two waves destructively interfere with each other (like noise
cancelling headphones)
• Real-Time Stick Slip Mitigation
Top Drive Stick Slip MitigationField Observations – Surface Data with RSS
12
* Stick Slip Severity = 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒−𝑀𝑖𝑛 𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒
On
Off
On
Off
On
Off
Before
REVit™
After
REVit™
Hours
Saved
Before
REVit™
After
REVit™
Trips
Saved
Before
REVit™
After
REVit™
Hours
Saved
Before
REVit™
After
REVit™
Trips
Saved
BAA 128.39 111.12 17.27 0.64 0.80 (0.16) 205.56 176.35 29.21 2.00 1.00 1.00
BBB 114.68 99.87 14.81 0.36 0.33 0.03 205.61 188.33 17.29 1.00 1.00 0.00
BCC 105.03 91.25 13.79 0.13 0.00 0.13 186.01 142.67 43.34 1.13 0.00 1.13
BDD 162.17 139.29 22.88 1.43 0.50 0.93 233.63 187.30 46.34 1.60 0.25 1.35
BEE 139.01 124.80 14.21 1.00 0.50 0.50 187.07 165.88 21.19 1.40 1.50 (0.10)
BFF 125.50 121.94 3.56 1.00 0.75 0.25 227.25 157.94 69.31 1.50 0.00 1.50
BGG 135.37 127.66 7.71 1.00 1.00 0.00 228.56 184.11 44.45 1.67 1.33 0.33
Rig
Vertical
Avg. Drilling Hours Avg. Unplanned Trips
Lateral
Avg. Drilling Hours Avg. Unplanned Trips
Case Study: Williston BasinStick Slip Mitigation Across Field
14
• Improved drilling performance across 7 rigs and 6 different counties
• Reduced unplanned trips due to bit wear and/or BHA failure.
• Over 100 wells REVit™ successfully reduced the time spent to drill the
vertical and horizontal portions of the well
Case Study: Middle EastExtended Bit Life and Improved Performance
15
C
B
A
C
B
A
• Eliminated 4 bit runs
• Significantly increased bit run length (3x in 22” section, 1.8x in 16” section)
Top Drive AutomationOvercoming Inefficiencies Through Scalable Technology
16
Performance Limiters Cost-Efficiency Challenges
SolutionROCKit® REVit™
Inefficient weight transfer when slide drilling
Rotary steerable failures caused by stick slip
Additional mud lubricants to improve sliding
MWD / Bit damage from stick slip
Lower ROP when slide drilling
Decreased ROP from damage to cutting structure
Tool face orientation time (invisible NPT)