|

Smart parking -Technology meets policy22 September 2015Berlin

Ivo Cré, Polis

|2 October 2015 2

|

Balancing objectives

Service

Streetregulation

Revenueraising

2 October 2015 3

Information- Total cost- AvailabilityPublic spaceReservationFree timePost-Payment optionsApps at kioskOpen data policy

Access to parking in function to transport alternativesImproved public space

Functional dfferentiation of use (E.g. forced rotation, temporary residents parking in off street)

Direct use of revenueFor parking investmentsIncreased revenueFom off-street parkingVAS of parking ITSPPP

Complexer value chains

|

Technology in relation to objectives (2013)

2 October 2015 4

Enforcement Informedtraveler

Parking rightsand

Payment

Informedoperator

- - -

+ + ++ / -

+ + +

|

Objectives of the afternoon

- Understanding cities’ needs withregards to parking technologies

- Understanding the technologiescurrently used in cities.

- Can we go beyond using technologyto be efficient on the ‘push’ side?

2 October 2015 5

|

Key notes and introductions

Words of welcome - Martin zur Nedden, Head of DifuPush and Pull: project introduction – Martina Hertel, Difu and RobertPressl, FGMLocal challenges: parking and new technologies, parking searchtraffic and residential parking - Steve Ison – Push and Pull referencegroup memberFair and efficient enforcement – Guiliano Mingardo, ErasmusUniversity

2 October 2015 6

|

Session 1 – cities’ challenges

Trends in use of public space in urban areas – new tasks formunicipalities, the example of Berlin- Hermann Blümel, City of BerlinParking space management and the promotion of energy-efficienttransport modes - Tomasz Zwolinski, City of KrakowIntegrating innovation in the new parking strategy - Louis de Geest,City of GentQ and A

2 October 2015 7

|

Session 2 - technology solutions

Parking Madrid, the Madrid parking app - Sergio Fernandez-Balaguer,EMT-MadridThe TIDE experience with sensor parking – Valentino Sevino, AMAT-MilanoHow will parking apps change parking? - Sven Lackinger, evopark

2 October 2015 8

|

Session 3 – Are the challenges met bytechnology?

Can we go beyond using technology to be efficient on the ‘push’side?

2 October 2015 9

|

What do cities want to achieve?Policy goals

Answer to citizens needs (increased expectations on livingenvironment)Modal shiftReduce negative impacts of car useReduce emissions

2 October 2015 10

|

Barriers

(relative and absolute) Dwindling numbers of car useLack of integrated PT and Parking planningEarmarking also has negative impactsLegal issues – privacyLegislative lag (local practice vs national law)

2 October 2015 11

|

What do cities want to achieve?Management goals

See direct impactAvoid road pricingIncrease financial resources for sustainable modesProtect financing and sustainance of particular programmes,organisationsAchieve public acceptanceBetter monitoring: capture data for better decision makingReduce costs – financial efficiency

2 October 2015 12

|

What do cities want to achieve?Operational goals

Link parking to energy supply (EVs)Manage residential parkingRaise revenue in a fair way – also from shared modesBetter enforcement in a - Frequent – effective – efficient – friendly –fair – transparent – wayManage space (– avoid chaos)

2 October 2015 13

|2 October 2015 14

Policy goalsAnswer to citizens needs (increased expectations on living environment)

Modal shift – space shiftReduce negative impacts of car use - Reduce emissions

Management goalsRealise direct impactIncrease financial resources forsustainable modesReduce costs – financial efficiencyAchieve public acceptanceBetter monitoring: capture data forbetter decision making

Operational goalsLink parking to energy supply(EVs)Manage residential parkingRaise revenue in a fair way – alsofrom shared modesBetter enforcementPush to off-streetManage space (– avoid chaos)Price differentiation (zones,vehicle quality etc.)

|

Lowtech has advantages

Quicker, less costly implementationOther objectives can be served (employment)

Workplace Parking LevyParking mediatorReplacement of car parking by bicycle parking (large numbers!)

2 October 2015 15

|

Technology on offer

PushSensors (street surface, lamp post) – RFIDANPRDigital parking rightsNational parking rights register(City proprietory) parking app (payment and information)Pay and display machines

PullInteractive (bicycle) parking maps / parking availability appCombined charging and parking(Free floating) shared carsBig dataOpen data

2 October 2015 16

|

What do we do with...

Parkatmyhouse.com (booking single spaces on residents’ property) add capacity lower public revenue, generate traffic?

Impacts of car sharingAutonomous vehicles

2 October 2015 17

|

Quote of the day...

Technologies help parking to move awayfrom being a second best solution fortransport demand management.

2 October 2015 18

|2 October 2015 19