slic fe 2011tom macmaster
Upload: scottish-library-information-council-slic-cilip-in-scotland-cilips
Post on 11-May-2015
877 views
DESCRIPTION
Post 16 educational reformsTRANSCRIPT
The Changing Learner Landscape :
Government proposals for post 16 education
Tom MacMasterHead of ICT, Digital Services and Library ServicesCarnegie College, Dunfermline
Health Warning
This is my interpretation of what’s going on. I’m speaking on behalf of myself not Carnegie College!
Purpose
1. To highlight the current reviews affecting post 16 education
2. To discuss some of the implications of these reviews
3. To think about key issues and future service delivery models
4. To consider how this affects Library service delivery
THE REVIEWS
So where are we going in the future?
Current Situation – Reviews, reviews and more Reviews
Griggs review on Governance of Colleges
McCllelland – Review of ICT Infrastructure in Scotland
Higher Education Information Directors Scotland (HEIDS) Above Campus IT Shared Services Report – funded by SFC
Roe Review of Post 16 Education and Vocational Training in Scotland
Griggs Review of College Governance
Remit
to consider whether current institutional governance arrangements in the college sector in Scotland deliver an appropriate level of democratic accountability given the level of public funding institutions receive; and
to examine the structure of college governance and make recommendations for change, including at sector-wide level, which will support the role of colleges in economic and social development in a highly challenging future financial climate
Expected to conclude by end of 2011
No clear route for providing evidence, no request for consultation
McCllelland Review of ICT Infrastructure in the Public Sector in Scotland. (June 2011)
Wants to radically change how ICT is adopted and deployed in public sector
Shared IT platforms – self sufficient operating mode no longer affordable
In F/HE, ‘The deployment of shared services in ICT is still relatively low and less than a third of the institutions had at least one shared service.’
Complete Paradigm Change Required (but convergence and connection rather than build anew)
National Oversight Board – FE/HE Governance Board
HEIDS – Above Campus Shared IT Services Report (July 2011)
Indicative projects for sharing –
IT Continuity, Collaboration Tools, Blackboard Licensing, Hosted VLE, Student Record Systems, Subscription Resources.
What about shared Repositories, Library Management Systems?
Working Groups already set up and progressing developments
Roe Review (August 2011)
Willy Roe, CBE – Chair of SDS Scotland (now retired)
Key Player in Government Plans for Role of Colleges
Modern Apprentices, Careers, My World of Work, Employability
45 Recommendations including the creation of a learner centred system that offers access to the world of work, operates collaboratively, is transparent and accountable, is market led with strong employer engagement….performance driven….embraces innovation, gains more from technologies etc etc
Recommends a Personal Development Account with a Learning Portal, an Open College and shared services
More Reviews and Consultation!
Scottish Government Spending Review – the Budget
SFC Review into funding of Colleges – methodology, distribution
Putting Learners at the Centre review – consultation ends 23 Dec
College Regionalisation – proposals for implementing Putting Learners at the Centre (Govt. AND Funding Council)
Spending Review - Budget Cuts
Financial Year College Programme
University Programme
College and University Capital
2012-13 506.9 1002.2 60.7
2013-14 494.7 1041.5 45.9
2014-15 470.7 1061.7 56.4
• 12/13 – cut 7% to 23% - depending on how calculated - Likely 20+%
• HE provision increased but not in Colleges?• Capital cut by £36.1m for Colleges and Universities – implications?
• Lots of Don’t knows
Funding Council Guidance
• Letter of guidance to SFC
• all16 to 19 year olds should be guaranteed an appropriate place in learning – Colleges have central role to play
• Where possible, Colleges should work with other agencies to provide similar offer to 20 – 24 year olds
• Improving employment chances and retention• Courses should lead to SCQF qualifications• Reduced budget means a need for substantial savings• Regional Funding to be in place for 2012 - 2013• Radical change, systemic change• HE needs to deliver on wider access, efficiencies, articulation
Relationship between reviews
Putting Learners At The Centre
GriggsSFC Funding
Budget
Colleges of the future
HEIDS
Roe
ICT
The Key Review – Putting Learners at the Centre (Sept 2011)
Joint Consultation Paper from Government and SFC – College Regionalisation: Proposals for Implementing ‘Putting Learners at the Centre’ (Nov 2011)
Consultation open till 23rd December 2011
Latest Documents
Putting Learners at the Centre review – reformed post 16 education system
The key review – key word ‘interconnectedness’
Legislation Core Purpose The Learner Journey Linked to Jobs and Growth Effective and Sustainable
Growth Regionalisation Simplification of funding Enhanced role for Education
Scotland and SFC Influence by Roe, McCllelland
Post 16 education must be
Sustainable Diverse Open for all Excellent Flexible International Learner centred Well-led Focussed on jobs and growth
What does this mean for Colleges?
Learner must come first
Focus on employment, skills and job readiness
Younger demographic
Closer working with others
Regional funding and regional working Governance options
Timeline – fast
Regional funding to be in place by AY 12/13 New structures to be complete in 2 to 3 yrs Fast moving landscape – change coming quickly
Highlands and Islands
North East
Tayside Scotland
Regional Groupings
Fife
Edinburgh and Lothians
BordersD & G
Glasgow
West
Ayrshire
Lanarkshire
Forth Valley
Excludes Newbattle Abbey, Sabhal Mor Ostaig and land based colleges
What does this mean for Colleges?
Ouch!!
More seriously, the documents detail the following -
Colleges need a much sharper focus on outcomes
Planning, funding and delivery is based on a regional approach, responding to the economic needs of that region
Boundaries should be invisible to students
Funding is simpler and needs based
More information in December 2011 regarding specific funding and activity levels for 2012 - 2013
Regional Provision will:
Create a more strategic approach to planning and delivery
Help every community and young person access appropriate College education
Enhance the capability to deliver part time learning
Better develop provision for employers
Major campuses will remain where they are – where there is no presence, colleges will be required to consider how they make adequate provision
Create cost efficiencies that can free resources to redirect to learners
Framework for joint working between partners – Employers, Schools, Colleges, Universities
Courses:
Putting Learners at the Centre articulates that Government investment in Colleges is to provide people with
The skills they need to get a job, keep a job, or get a better job and develop a career
SFC funds must meet this purpose
Measured by outcome agreements agreed with Regions with Colleges concentrating on courses leading to RECOGNISED qualifications (including Voc, non advanced and advanced) and supporting the senior phase of CfE, including school college partnership programmes
Funding likely to be allocated to regions on basis of each regions’ share of people with low qualifications
Funding:
From 2013 – 2014, propose a simplified approach
Subject Based Payment reflecting cost of provision in an efficient College
Payment reflecting additional costs of teaching students with additional needs (DPG18 and XLSPs) will be incorporated in above payment and separate fund for complex additional needs to be created which could include students from areas of extreme social deprivation – more work required on this system
Additional costs for remote or rural areas
Student support to be regionalised on the basis of student places and historical proportions of FT FE student bursary and childcare take up. May keep funds back till evidence of demmand
Student Numbers:
Intend to simplify the current system and base it on converting learning hours required per credit to full time equivalent student places
Retention rates must improve and evidence base for drop our reasons must be better
Cut off point may rise to 50% of course duration rather than 25%
Looking for transparency rather than tricks
Regional Structures and Accountability:
‘Putting Learners at the Centre signals a Government wish for a fundamental change in accountability arrangements for College funding. Colleges now have to meet their own activity targets, provide education of at least acceptable quality and maintain financial viability’
‘Government proposes that Colleges will become directly accountable for how well collectively they serve the needs of their region, on the basis of negotiated outcome agreements for each region’
Reflects Return on Investment expected by Govt and SFC for their investment – Negotiated SMART outcome agreements
Regional Structures :
4 Broad Options
Merged College : well established route to merger
Federation of Colleges: Joint Board to receive and account for funding. New fundable body created. New concept, but analagous to funding of HE in UHI
‘Lead College’ : A College in one area becomes the body funded and accountable to SFC with contractual arrangements between it and the other Colleges
Collaboration: Colleges funded directly but agree collaboration tom meet regional needs
Colleges asked to find best way with implementation timetable but with efficiencies always in mind
Radical, Fast Moving Change
Regional Funding from 2012 – 2013
Transitional arrangements to be put in place to deal with shifts in funding and setting clear direction of travel
Most regions to implement structural change in 2012 – 13
New Structures operational in most regions 2013 – 2014
New Structures operational in remaining regions 2014 – 2015
Review and monitoring of outcome agreements
Library Service Delivery
Library Services will be part of the change process
Technology will drive this as it will Curriculum Delivery
Faced Change before – Incorporation in 1993
Learners at the Centre stresses the need for Learner Engagement
Learners Value Libraries
Libraries Collaborate already
Learners at the Centre implies more independence and personalised learning (CfE )
Library Service Delivery
Information Literacy Vital
Learners will need access to quality resources and support in using them
Learners need Study Points
Learners at the Centre emphasises Articulation and Progression Routes
Part Time Learners, Distance Learners and Online Learners still exist
Learners Will be:
Younger- remember the focus on 16 – 19
Used to using technology
Likely to have a mobile device
Used to personalised spaces – facebook, online gaming worlds
Have had access to Glow
All impacting on Library Service Delivery
Over to you…………………………..