slac damage tests

9
1 G.E. Ellwood Advanced Materials Group 1 SLAC Damage Tests • Used pulse time of 1ps, with a gap of 0.1s between pulses. • Used heat deposition file supplied by Luis using the very fine mesh on a small volume. • Studied the .010<z<.015m range. • Used the same mesh, 20x20x120μm. • Coupled Field elements.

Upload: asher-rose

Post on 31-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

SLAC Damage Tests. Used pulse time of 1ps, with a gap of 0.1s between pulses. Used heat deposition file supplied by Luis using the very fine mesh on a small volume. Studied the .010

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SLAC Damage Tests

1G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 1

SLAC Damage Tests

• Used pulse time of 1ps, with a gap of 0.1s between pulses.

• Used heat deposition file supplied by Luis using the very fine mesh on a small volume.

• Studied the .010<z<.015m range.

• Used the same mesh, 20x20x120μm.

• Coupled Field elements.

Page 2: SLAC Damage Tests

2G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 2

1st example

-.015m < z < .015m

2nd Example

.010m < z < .015m

The peak temperature rise is

only seen in the .010m < z

< .015m

region.

What happens on the other region has very little effect on the peak values. This reduces the number of elements needed significantly.

Page 3: SLAC Damage Tests

3G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

Time (s)

Tem

per

atu

re (

°C)

Tem

p.

rise=

17.5

°C

Tem

p.

rise=

16.6

°C

Temp. loss = 10.7°C

Temp. loss = 10.8°C

Temperature v. Time at Hottest Node

Initial run with coarse mesh

Maximum temperature is a lot lower than would be seen with a finer mesh.

Page 4: SLAC Damage Tests

4G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 4

Comparison – Hottest Node

0

50

100

150

200

250

0.00E+00 2.00E-13 4.00E-13 6.00E-13 8.00E-13 1.00E-12 1.20E-12

Time (s)

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Full range

Reduced Z

Plotted temperature at hottest node during the first bunch heating, which used the same heating regime.

Hottest nodes had the same global location, but different numbering due to meshing.

The temperatures were exactly the same, despite the different geometry.

Page 5: SLAC Damage Tests

5G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 5

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12

Time (s)

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Tem

p. r

ise

= 2

33.0

2°C

Tem

p. r

ise

= 2

33.3

17°C

Smaller time steps are required in this region

Heat loss = 197.482°C

Page 6: SLAC Damage Tests

6G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 6

Page 7: SLAC Damage Tests

7G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 7

Coarse v. Fine mesh – relative to highest value

Page 8: SLAC Damage Tests

8G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 8

0.00E+00 2.00E-07 4.00E-07 6.00E-07 8.00E-07 1.00E-06 1.20E-06

Time (s)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0.00E+00 2.00E-02 4.00E-02 6.00E-02 8.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.20E-01

Te

mp

era

ture

(°C

)

337ns bunch gap0.1 bunch gap

Page 9: SLAC Damage Tests

9G.E. Ellwood

Advanced Materials Group 9

0.00E+00

1.00E+07

2.00E+07

3.00E+07

4.00E+07

5.00E+07

6.00E+07

7.00E+07

8.00E+07

9.00E+07

0.00E+00 2.00E-02 4.00E-02 6.00E-02 8.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.20E-01

Time (s)

Von

Mis

es S

tres

s (M

Pa)