six sigma 66 66 sam tomas, cfpim, crm, c.p.m. kokopelli

21
Six Sigma 6 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

Upload: heidi-tibbetts

Post on 31-Mar-2015

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

Six SigmaSix Sigma

66Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M.

Kokopelli

Page 2: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

2

What is Six Sigma?

• Sigma is the Greek letter “” that represents the “standard deviation” or variability of a group of items from their average value.

• A Six Sigma program is therefore a variability reducing program.– The key objectives include improved processes, product

performance, and reliability

Six Sigma is a reference to a particular goal of reducing defects to near zero.

Page 3: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

3

What Else is Six Sigma?

• A concept that provides a relatively new way to measure how good a product is. It relates to a manufacturing or service failure rate of only 3.4 rejects per million operations, or a yield of 99.99 99 99 8%.

When a product is six sigma, it tells us that the quality level is excellent.

Page 4: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

4

Why Six Sigma?

• The inadequacy of 99.9% accuracy can be illustrated as follows:– 22,000 checks will be deducted from the wrong bank

accounts in the next 60 minutes– 880,000 credit cards in circulation will have incorrect

cardholder information on their magnetic strips– 268,500 defective tires will be shipped this year– 18,322 pieces of mail will be mishandled the next hour– 14,208 defective computers will be shipped this year

Why spend money to achieve six sigma quality when perhaps 99% or 98% perfect would be totally adequate?

Page 5: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

5

But With Six Sigma Quality -

• Drug prescriptions– One incorrect drug prescriptions

every 25 years.

• Surgical operations– One incorrect surgical operation

every 20 years

• Mail Delivery– Only one article of mail lost

every 35 years

Page 6: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

6

The Bathtub Curve• Shows reliability of a product in terms of failure rate

per month• The curve presents two shaded areas

– Latent defect rate• Causes early failure after a product is delivered

– Inherent failure rate• Function of product design, materials, processes, and

technologies used in manufacturing.

• Defects in manufacturing are caused by:– Narrow design margins for the product– Insufficient manufacturing process controls– Poor incoming materials/parts quality

Page 7: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

7

The Bathtub Curve

Design-Related (Inherent) Failures

Quality Failures due toProcess & Material

Wear outFailures

Time

Failu

re R

ate

Failu

re R

ate

IInfant

Mortality

IIUseful

Life

IIIWear out

Overall Life Characteristic curve

LatentDefects

Inherent Failure Area

Time

Page 8: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

8

6 Sigma Versus 4 Sigma

• Even well controlled processes experience shifts in the mean as great as ± 1-1/2 standard deviations.

• A normal 4 sigma process plus a 1-1/2 sigma shift in the process average would result in 4 sigma variations of 6,210 defects per million operations.

Why attempt to achieve 6 sigma when 4 sigma (99.9937%) may be adequate?

Page 9: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

9

Yield Rates ofSix Sigma Products

• It is possible to build a product in which each component is a six sigma component and yet have the product exhibit yields of only 90%, 80%, 70%, 60% etc.

• What we are talking about is rolled-throughput yield or the probability that all product, process and material characteristics will simultaneously conform to their respective standards.

Page 10: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

10

Improvement Efforts Required to Reach Six Sigma

4

310 X Improvement

66,810 dpm

6,210 dpm

530 X Improvement

223 dpm

670 X Improvement

3.4 dpm

Dpm = defects per million

10

Page 11: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

11

Where are Average Companies in Quality?

• Approximately 2 Sigma– IRS – Tax advice over the phone

• Approximately 4 Sigma (Average)– Restaurant bills– Doctor prescription writing– Payroll processing– Order write-ups

• Approximately 6 Sigma– Best in class – Seiko, HP Inc., etc.

• 6.5 Sigma– Domestic flight fatality rate (0.43 ppm)

2

4

6

6.5

Page 12: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

12

Relationship of Defects to Other Factors

• The 6 sigma concept indicates there are strong relationships between product “defects” and such factors as:– Reliability– Product yields– Cycle times– Inventories– Schedules

The higher the sigma value, the more reliable the process being monitored and the higher the improvement in all areas.

Page 13: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

13

Financial Implicationsof Low Sigma

• The lower the sigma level, the higher the repair costs

• A 4 sigma company spends more than 15% of its sales dollars for internal and external repairs

• A 6 sigma company spends about 1%• Over the long run, a 4 sigma company will

not be able to compete with a 6 sigma company.

Page 14: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

14

What is the Cost of Quality? Goal: Improve cost, quality, and schedule

performance via process improvement and reduction of process variations.

Sigma Level Defects Per Million Opportunities Cost of Quality

2 308,537 (Noncompetitive companies) N/A

3 66,807 25-40% of sales

4 6,210 (Industry average) 15-25% of sales

5 233 5-15% of sales

6 3.4 (World Class) 1% of sales

Note: Each sigma improvement represents a 10% net improvement in income.

Page 15: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

15

The Tools of Six Sigma

• Design to standard parts/ materials• Design to standard processes• Design to known capabilities• Design for assembly• Design for simplicity

• Parts standardization• Supplier SPC (SSPC)• Supplier certification• ERP/MRP

• Process optimization• Process characterization• Process standardization• Short-cycle manufacturing• Statistical process control

Region ofSix Sigma Synergy

Design

Process Material

Page 16: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

16

Overcome Process Variation:First Strategy

• Anticipate problems – develop controls during the design cycle for both the product and the manufacturing process steps to include the following:– Define 6 sigma tolerances on all critical product and

process parameters– Minimize the total number of parts in the product– Minimize the number of process steps– Standardize on parts and procedures– Use SPC during initial design and prototype

design phases

Page 17: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

17

Overcome Process Variation:Second Strategy

• Use statistical process control (SPC) on the process to continually isolate, control and eliminate variation resulting from people, machines and the environment.

Page 18: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

18

Overcome Process Variation:Third Strategy

• The third strategy addresses suppliers– Institute a supplier qualification program using

SSPC techniques– Require suppliers to provide process control plans

and process control charts– Minimize the number of suppliers used– Work towards a long term “win-win” partnership

with all selected suppliers

Page 19: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

19

Five Steps to Six Sigma for Manufacturing

1. Identify product characteristics necessary to satisfy customers (Use QFD)

2. Determine if characteristics are controlled by part, process or both

3. Decide max allowed tolerance for correct performance

4. Determine existing process variations5. Change product design, process, or both to

attain the correct characteristics

Page 20: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

20

What Are Some Possible Applications for Six Sigma?

• In the stockroom– Used to reduce parts counts that are found to be inaccurate

• In personnel– Used to reduce the number of requisitions unfilled after 30 days

• In customer service– Used to measure number of calls unanswered on the 2nd or 3rd ring

• In sales– Used to track errors in completing order forms

• In order fulfillment– Used to eliminate returns because of wrong product being shipped

• In finance– Used to reduce the instances of accounts being paid after a specified time

limit has elapsed

Page 21: Six Sigma 66 66 Sam Tomas, CFPIM, CRM, C.P.M. Kokopelli

Six SigmaSix Sigma

Dilbert