sistema universitario ana g. méndez, inc. school for ... 540 dlp 2013... · de los diferentes...
TRANSCRIPT
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Inc.
School for Professional Studies
Florida Campuses
Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, and Universidad del Turabo
CRJU 540
Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes
© Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Inc. 2013
Derechos Reservados
© Ana G. Méndez University System, Inc. 2013
All rights reserved
April 5, 2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes2
Please include all applicable information below:
Prepared based on the course syllabus (2008) of the School of Education, with the
collaboration of:
Lucette Cardona, M.A., J.D., Module Development Specialist
Felix Mangual, J.D., Content Evaluator
Luis L. Díaz, English Language Specialist
Bárbaro Forteza, Spanish Language Specialist
Joe Hernández, Curriculum and Instructional Design
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes3
TABLA DE CONTENIDO/TABLE OF CONTENTS
Página/Page
GUÍA DE ESTUDIO ...................................................................................................................... 4
STUDY GUIDE ............................................................................................................................ 20
TALLER UNO.............................................................................................................................. 35
WORKSHOP TWO ...................................................................................................................... 43
TALLER TRES ............................................................................................................................ 49
WORKSHOP FOUR .................................................................................................................... 57
TALLER CINCO/WORKSHOP FIVE ........................................................................................ 65
ANEJO A/APPENDIX A NATIONAL PROFICIENCY LEVELS FOR
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ......................................................................................... 75
ANEJO B/APPENDIX BTHE WRITING PROCESS6-TRAITS WRITING RUBRIC .............. 80
APÉNDICE C / APPENDIX C ORAL PRESENTATION RUBRIC .......................................... 88
APÉNDICE D / APPENDIX D: GUIDELINES TO PREPARE THE PORTFOLIO.................. 93
APÉNDICE E/ APPENDIX E: SELF-REFLECTION ................................................................. 95
APÉNDICE F / APPENDIX F ANALITICAL ESSAY RUBRIC ............................................... 98
APÉNDICE G / APPENDIX G STUDY CASES AND EXERCISES ...................................... 104
APÉNDICE H / APPENDIX H ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION
EVALUATION........................................................................................................................... 106
APÉNDICE I / APPENDIX I FINAL PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS ......................................... 109
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes4
GUÍA DE ESTUDIO
Título del Curso: La Policía y los Cambios Jurídicos
Codificación: CRJU 540
Créditos: 3
Duración: 5 semanas
Prerrequisito: Ninguno
Descripción:
Estudio de la dinámica que envuelve la función de la policía, al ser impactada por los
cambios que operan desde el nivel legislativo y las subsecuentes interpretaciones
judiciales. Se analizará el efecto que ello tiene en la investigación criminal y la forma
en que se afectan los derechos de las personas que cometen delitos.
Objetivos de Contenido Generales:
Al finalizar el curso, se espera que el estudiante haya adquirido las destrezas para:
1. Conocer,comprenderyexplicar la función de la policía. 2. Analizar, a base de las decisiones jurisprudenciales, los cambios operacionales y
ajustes que tiene que desarrollar la policías cuando los tribunales emiten opiniones
que varían drásticamente el curso usual de las operaciones en el campo de
investigación e intervención con los ciudadanos.
3. Estudiar el impacto de los cambios jurisprudenciales en los procesos de:
identificación de sospechosos, arrestos, allanamientos, registros, vistas preliminares,
reglas de procedimiento criminal, reglas de evidencia, legislación que enmiende la
ley penal y/o que cree nuevos delitos, situaciones resultantes de la aplicación de la
Ley de Tránsito y otras funciones de prevención, custodia y protección de vidas y
propiedades.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes5
4. Describir las enmiendas constitucionales directamente relacionadas con los
cambios jurisprudenciales y que de forma directa impactan la función de la policía.
5. Entender los procedimientos investigativos utilizados por la policía, las
limitaciones en su diligencia en el campo y los posibles conflictos legales que
pueden surgir en su empleo según requerido por la ley.
6. Considerar los cambios sociales y tecnológicos a nivel nacional y mundial y
proyectar como estos podrían afectar de forma futura la función de la policía a nivel
nacional.
Objetivos de Lenguaje Generales:
Al finalizar el curso, se espera que el estudiante haya adquirido las destrezas para:
a. Escuchar: Entender la función general y operacional de la policía.
b. Hablar: Debatir y analizar las diferentes decisiones jurisprudenciales que afectan
la operación diaria de la policía, así como los posibles conflictos constitucionales
que han llevado a la creación de dichas reglas.
c. Leer:Analizar información relacionada a la función de la policía, decisiones
jurisprudenciales que afectan la operación de la policía, y su aplicación por medio
de los diferentes métodos investigativos utilizados por el sistema.
d. Escribir:Redactar documentos relacionados con los temas de la función de la
policía también, sobre el efecto de la decisiones jurisprudenciales en su operación
diaria y su trascendencia futura a nivel nacional y mundial que surjan de los
diferentes cambios sociales y tecnológicos.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes6
Requisitos del Laboratorio de Lenguaje o Laboratorio Electrónico: (Tell Me
More,Net Tutor, WimbaVoice, Biblioteca Virtual y Voice E-mail.)
� Requisitos Mínimos de Laboratorio de Lenguaje: Los estudiantes deben
demostrar que ellos han cumplido con las horas de uso en el laboratorio de
lenguaje (inglés y español) por curso. El facilitador podría requerir más horas de
práctica basada en las necesidades para las destrezas auditivas, orales, de lectura y
escritura en cualquiera de los lenguajes mencionados. El total de horas de
práctica en el laboratorio de lenguaje o e-lab deben de estar integradas en la
sección de actividades del módulo.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes7
Descripción del Proceso de Evaluación:
Criterios Taller Porcentaje
Asistencia 1-5 15%
Prueba 5 15%
Trabajos escritos 1-5 20%
Discusiones en clase 1-5 10%
Presentaciones Orales 3,5 15%
Portafolio digital 1-5 5%
Trabajo de Investigación Final 5 20%
100%
1. Asistencia y Participación en clase – (Talleres 1 y 3 – Español; Talleres 2 y 4 - Inglés; Taller 5 – Inglés/Español) (Apéndice H)
La asistencia a cada taller es obligatoria y el estudiante recibirá 15 puntos por cada clase.
El ausentarse afectará la nota final. La participación en clase será evaluada mediante las
discusiones de los diferentes temas y las actividades que se desarrollen en el transcurso
del taller y el estudiante recibirá 15 puntos por su participación. Además, se evaluarán los
siguientes criterios:
a. dominio del material discutido en clase
b. cumplimiento con las tareas asignadas en clase
c. puntualidad en la entrega de trabajos.
Para aprobar el curso, es requisito la asistencia.
2. Prueba
Se administrarán una prueba en el taller el último taller (5). La misma debe ser redactada
mitad en el idioma inglés y mitad en idioma español (50% y 50%). El formato de la
prueba puede ser objetivo, de tema a desarrollar o preguntas cortas a discreción del
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes8
facilitador. A través de sus contestaciones, cada estudiante debe evidenciar que domina
la materia o el tema al que se hace referencia.
3. Diario Reflexivo
El diario reflexivo consistirá en un texto narrativo, a modo de ensayo, en el idioma que
corresponda al taller, de una página en la última versión del estilo APA y se realizará
semanalmente. En este diario, el estudiante deberá escribir todo aquello que documente el
crecimiento de su conocimiento en clase. Se debe llevar a cabo un diario reflexivo por
clase y estos deben ser añadidos al portafolio digital (refiérase al manual del portafolio
digital). Estos formarán parte del portafolio digital.
5. Ensayos Analíticos (Talleres 1, 2, 3, 4,5 – Apéndice F)
a. Los ensayos analíticos tratarán los siguientes temas:
Ensayo analítico siguiendo el modelo APA donde se expliquen todas las facetas o
funciones de la policía. El ensayo debe incluir una discusión profunda acerca de las
funciones de la policía desde la función de seguridad hasta su función gubernamental y
política como entidad encargada de velar por el cumplimiento de la ley. Este ensayo será
redactado en español y se entregará al inicio del Taller Uno.
Se redactarán un ensayo del caso asignado. El ensayo debe contener una narrativo de
los hechos así como, la controversia y la decisión emitida por la corte con una
explicación de su razonamiento El ensayo será escritos en inglés y se entregarán al inicio
del Taller Dos.
Un ensayo estilo APA donde describa los diferentes avances tecnológicos utilizados
por la policía en los últimos 10 años en el proceso de investigación a nivel federal y
estatal. Luego, analicé e integre de acuerdo con la discusión de las Enmiendas de la Carta
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes9
del Ciudadano de los Estados Unidos, “Bill of Rights” (Enmiendas IV, V, VI, VII, VIII y
XIV) llevada a cabo durante el taller anterior (Taller 2) cual o cuales estarían en peligro
de ser quebrantadas por el uso de la nueva tecnología. Este ensayo debe ser entregado y
el mismo debe contener un mínimo de dos (2) páginas. Este ensayo debe ser redactado en
Español.
� Se redactará un ensayo analítico siguiendo las reglas APA acerca de las operaciones
encubiertas bajo las agencias federales (FBI) y el protocolo o procedimiento para su
autorización, monitoreo y control de este tipo de operación. También, como parte del
análisis los estudiantes deben explicar los posibles conflictos constitucionales y
legales de este tipo de operación. El ensayo debe incluir un mínimo de tres (3)
páginas y debe ser redactado en Ingles.
� Se redactará un ensayo analítico acerca de la historia de los Derechos Humanos y su
relación con el movimiento de los Derechos Civiles en los Estados Unidos. Este
ensayo será redactado en inglés y entregado al inicio del Taller Cuatro.
� Se redactará un ensayo como parte del trabajo de investigación final donde el
estudiante tendrá la oportunidad de investigar acerca de modalidades de crímenes
recientes y sus elementos, los esfuerzos de las agencias del orden público tanto
federal como estatal para resolver o controlar la incidencia del crímen asignado.
También, llevarán a cabo un estudio exhaustivo de las diferentes estrategias
operacionales que sean puesto en práctica para el control y monitoreo de la actividad
criminal asignada así como recientes leyes que se están aplicando en base a las
decisiones en casos resueltos en esa área. El ensayo deberá ser redactado en español y
será entregado al comienzo del Taller Cinco.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes10
6. Trabajo Final/ Proyecto de Investigación
Cada estudiante preparará un ensayo escrito de un mínimo de cuatro (4) páginas donde se
discutirán las diferentes estrategias operacionales que sean puesto en práctica para el
control y monitoreo de la actividad criminal asignada así como recientes leyes que se
están aplicando en base a las decisiones en casos resueltos en esa área.(los efectos de la
decisiones judiciales en las investigaciones criminales) los crímenes del futuro. El trabajo
escrito debe ser individual pero, el facilitador puede modificar la actividad dependiendo
del tamaño del grupo.
El trabajo debe incluir una discusión de los siguientes puntos:
� Descripción del crimen con sus elementos que lo conforman.
� Las diferentes modalidades que existen del crimen asignado, si existe más de una
forma de llevar a cabo dicho crimen.
� Discusión de las agencias y departamentos se encargan del monitoreo y control de
dicho crimen a todos los niveles (estatal [FL solamente] y federal).
� Evaluación de las leyes y (decisiones judiciales actuales y su influencia en la
investigaciones de violaciones de lay) sistemas actuales para manejar y controlar la
ocurrencia del asignado crimen. Si o No. Explique.
� Cualquier otro esfuerzo o ajuste que haya sido puesto en función por los agentes del
orden públicotanto a nivel local como estatalpara conducir una investigación efectiva
y así, librar una lucha efectiva contra el crimen asignado.
� Sugerencias en término de recursos para controlar el crimen asignado.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes11
o Incluya ejemplos de recursos financieros, infraestructurales y
operacionales que serían necesarios para controlar la incidencia del crimen
asignado. También, puede incluir cualquier otro recurso que usted
entienda necesario para el control del crimen asignado.
� Consecuencias económicas y políticas de este problema a nivel nacional e
internacional.
En la preparación del tema se deben consultar al menos tres (3) fuentes de información
confiables. Recuerde que su trabajo debe ser original y debe dar crédito a la fuente
cuando cita o parafrasea. El trabajo escrito será evaluado con los Anejos A, B y F.
El trabajo final debe incluir una presentación oral elaborada en PowerPoint. El facilitador
indicará el tiempo sugerido de acuerdo al tamaño de la clase. Las presentaciones serán
evaluadas con el Anejo C. (Refiérase al Anejo I para detalles y temas)
Portafolio Digital
El Digital Performance Portfolio Assessment debe ser uno de los instrumentos para
evaluar el progreso lingüístico y académico de los estudiantes. Debido a la naturaleza del
modelo bilingüe instruccional, el facilitador debe documentar que el estudiante esté
progresando hacia la meta de dominar dos idiomas académicamente. El portafolio debe
cumplir con los estándares establecidos. El facilitador subirá el documento Digital
Performance Portfolio AssessmentHandbook a la plataforma electrónica Blackboard de
la cual los estudiantes podrán accederlo.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes12
Escala Evaluativa:
Se aplicará la curva estándar para evaluar en este curso:
100 – 90% A
89 – 80% B
79 – 70% C
69 – 60% D
59 – 0% F
Libro(s)
Jeffery, Walker & Craig, Hemmens. (2011). Legal Guide for Police: Constitutional
Issues (9th ed.). Burlington MA: Anderson Publishing. ISBN:978-1-4377-5588-
6. Precioestimado: $35.00.
Burns G. Ronald & Crawford, Charles (2002).Policing and Violence(Revised ed.). New
Jersey, New York: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 0-13-028437-8. Estimated Price: $55.00.
Libro(s) Electrónico(s)
Judicial Process: Law, Courts, and Politics in the United. (2012)
http://books.google.com/books?id=x7fOVPmlS4MC&pg=PA247&dq=police+an
d+judicial+changes+in+the+US&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NwdvUefxM5SC8AS_2ICw
BQ&sqi=2&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=police%20and%20judicial%2
0changes%20in%20the%20US&f=falsePrecio Estimado: Gratuito – Google
Books
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes13
Descripción de las Normas del Curso
1. Este curso sigue el modelo “Discipline-Based Dual LanguageImmersionModel®”
del Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Inc. el cual está diseñado para
promover el desarrollo de cada estudiante como un profesional bilingüe. Cada
taller será facilitado en inglés y español, utilizando el modelo 50/50. Esto
significa que cada taller deberá ser conducido enteramente en el idioma
especificado. Los idiomas serán alternados en cada taller para asegurar que el
curso se ofrezca 50% en inglés y 50% en español. Para mantener un balance, el
módulo debe especificar que se utilizarán ambos idiomas en el quinto taller,
dividiendo el tiempo y las actividades equitativamente entre ambos idiomas. Las
primeras dos horas son estrictamente en español y las últimas dos en inglés.
Los cursos de lenguaje deben ser desarrollados en el idioma correspondiente, en
inglés o en español, según aplique.
2. El curso es conducido en formato acelerado y bilingüe, esto requiere que los
estudiantes sean sumamente organizados, enfocados y que se preparen antes de
cada taller de acuerdo al módulo. El estudiante debe hacer todo esfuerzo para
desarrollar las destrezas en los dos idiomas usando los recursos de lenguaje
disponibles dentro y fuera de la institución. El convertirse en un profesional
bilingüe es un proceso complejo y exigente. Cada taller requiere un promedio de
diez (10) horas de preparación y en ocasiones requiere más para poder tener éxito
lingüístico y académico.
3. La asistencia a todos los talleres es obligatoria. El estudiante que se ausente al
taller deberá presentar una excusa razonable al facilitador. El facilitador evaluará
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes14
si la ausencia es justificada y decidirá como el estudiante repondrá el trabajo
perdido, de ser necesario. El facilitador puede elegir una de estas dos alternativas:
(a) permitirle al estudiante reponer el trabajo o (b) asignarle trabajo adicional
además del trabajo que el estudiante tenga que reponer.
Toda tarea a ser completada antes del taller deberá ser entregada en la fecha
asignada. El facilitador ajustará la nota de las tareas repuestas.
4. Si un estudiante se ausenta a más de un taller el facilitador tendrá las
siguientes opciones:
a. Si es a dos talleres, el facilitador reducirá la nota existente en un
grado.
b. Si el estudiante se ausenta a tres talleres, el facilitador reducirá la
nota existente en dos grados.
5. La asistencia y participación en actividades en la clase y presentaciones orales es
extremadamente importante pues éstas no se pueden reponer. Si el estudiante
provee una excusa válida y verificable, el facilitador determinará una actividad
equivalente a evaluar que sustituya la misma. Esta actividad deberá incluir el
mismo contenido y componentes del lenguaje como la presentación oral o
actividad que requiera repuesta.
6. En actividades grupales, el grupo será evaluado por su trabajo final. Sin embargo,
cada miembro de grupo deberá participar y cooperar para lograr un trabajo de
excelencia. Los estudiantes también recibirán una calificación individual.
7. Se espera que todo trabajo escrito sea de la autoría de cada estudiante y no
plagiado. Se requiere que todo trabajo sometido al facilitador cumpla con las
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes15
reglas para citar apropiadamente o que esté parafraseado y citado dando crédito al
autor. Todo estudiante debe ser el autor de su propio trabajo. Todo trabajo que
sea plagiado, copiado o presente trazos del trabajo de otro estudiante o autor será
calificado con cero. El servicio de SafeAssignTM de Blackboard será utilizado
por los facilitadores para verificar la autoría de los trabajos escritos de los
estudiantes. Es responsabilidad del estudiante de leer la política de plagio de su
universidad. Si usted es estudiante de UT, deberá leer la Sección 11.1 del Manual
del Estudiante. Si es estudiante de UMET y UT, refiérase al Capítulo 13,
secciones 36 y 36.1 de los respectivos manuales.
Se espera un comportamiento ético en todas las actividades del curso. Esto
implica que TODOS los trabajos tienen que ser originales y que para toda
referencia utilizada deberá indicarse la fuente, bien sea mediante citas o
bibliografía utilizando el estilo APA, versión 6. No se tolerará el plagio y, en caso
de que se detecte casos del mismo, el estudiante se expone a recibir cero en el
trabajo y a ser referido al Comité de Disciplina de la institución. Los estudiantes
deben observar aquellas prácticas dirigidas para evitar incurrir en el plagio de
documentos y trabajos pues va en contra de la ética profesional.
8. Para el facilitador poder hacer cambios a las actividades del módulo o guía de
estudio, deberá ser aprobado por el Director de Facultad y Currículo antes de la
primera clase. Es requisito que el facilitador discuta y entregue una copia de los
cambios a los estudiantes al principio del primer taller.
9. El facilitador establecerá los medios para contactar a los estudiantes proveyendo
su correo electrónico de SUAGM, teléfonos, día y horario disponibles.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes16
10. El uso de celulares está prohibido durante las sesiones de clase; de haber una
necesidad, deberá permanecer en vibración o en silencio.
11. La visita de niños y parientes no registrados en el curso no está permitida en el
salón de clases.
12. Todo estudiante está sujeto a las políticas y normas de conducta y
comportamiento que rigen al SUAGM, al curso y a un adulto profesional.
Nota: Si por alguna razón no puede acceder a las direcciones electrónicas ofrecidas en el
módulo, notifique al facilitador pero no se limite a ellas. Existen otros motores de
búsqueda y sitios Web que podrá utilizar para la búsqueda de la información deseada.
Algunos de éstos son:
• www.google.com
• www.ask.com
• www.pregunta.com
• www.findarticles.com
• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu
• www.eric.ed.gov/
• www.flelibrary.org/
• http://www.apastyle.org/
Para comprar o alquilar libros de texto o referencias nuevas o usadas puede visitar:
• http://www.chegg.com/(alquiler)
• http://www.bookswim.com/ (alquiler)
• http://www.allbookstores.com/ (compra)
• http://www.alibris.com/(compra)
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes17
Éstos son sólo algunas de las muchas compañías donde puede comprar o alquilar libros.
El facilitador puede realizar cambios a las direcciones electrónicas y/o añadir otras de
índole profesional y que contengan las investigaciones más recientes del tópico del
módulo, de ser necesario.
CUMPLIMIENTO DE LA LEY DE INVESTIGACIÓN:
Si el facilitador o el estudiante requirieran o desearan hacer una investigación, o la
administración de cuestionarios o entrevistas, éstos deberán referirse a las normas y
procedimientos de la Oficina de Cumplimiento y solicitar su autorización. Para acceder a
los formularios de la Oficina de Cumplimiento pueden visitar este enlace
http://www.suagm.edu/ac_aa_re_ofi_formularios.asp y seleccionar los formularios que
necesite. Además de los formularios el estudiante/facilitador podrá encontrar las
instrucciones para la certificación de investigación en línea. Estas certificaciones
incluyen: Institutional Review Board (IRB), Health Information Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA), y Responsibility Conduct for Research Act (RCR).
Si el facilitador o el estudiante requirieran o desearán una investigación o la
administración de cuestionarios o entrevistas, éstos deberán referirse a las normas y
procedimientos de la Oficina de Cumplimiento y solicitar su autorización. Para
acceder a los formularios de la Oficina de Cumplimiento pueden visitar este enlace:
http://www.suagm.edu/ac_aa_re_ofi_formularios.asp y seleccionar los formularios
que necesite. Además de los formularios el estudiante/facilitador puede encontrar
las instrucciones para la certificación de investigación en línea. Estas certificaciones
incluyen: IRB Institutional Review Board (IRB), Health Information Portability
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes18
and Accountability Act (HIPAA), y Responsibility Conduct for Research Act
(RCR).
De tener alguna duda, favor de comunicarse con las Coordinadoras Institucionales o a la
Oficina de Cumplimiento a los siguientes teléfonos:
Sra. Evelyn Rivera Sobrado, Directora Oficina de Cumplimiento
Tel. (787) 751-0178 Ext. 7196
Srta. Carmen Crespo, Coordinadora Institucional Cumplimiento – UMET
Tel. (787) 766-1717 Ext. 6366
Sra. Josefina Melgar, Coordinadora Institucional Cumplimiento – Turabo
Tel. (787) 743-7979 Ext.4126
Dra. Rebecca Cherry, Coordinadora Institucional Cumplimiento - UNE
Tel. (787) 257-7373 Ext. 3936
Filosofía y Metodología Educativa
Este curso está basado en la filosofía educativa del Constructivismo. El Constructivismo
es una filosofía de aprendizaje fundamentada en la premisa, de que, reflexionando a
través de nuestras experiencias, podemos construir nuestro propio entendimiento sobre el
mundo en el que vivimos.
Cada uno de nosotros genera sus propias “reglas” y “modelos mentales” que utilizamos
para darle sentido a nuestras experiencias. Aprender, por lo tanto, es simplemente el
proceso de ajustar nuestros modelos mentales para poder entender nuevas experiencias.
Como facilitadores, nuestro enfoque es el de mantener una conexión entre los hechos con
las experiencias y fomentar un nuevo entendimiento en los estudiantes. También,
intentamos adaptar nuestras estrategias de enseñanza a las respuestas de nuestros
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes19
estudiantes y motivar a los mismos a analizar, interpretar, predecir información y
aplicarla a la vida diaria.
PRINCIPIOS DEL CONSTRUCTIVISMO:
1. El aprendizaje es una búsqueda de significados. Por lo tanto, el aprendizaje debe
comenzar con situaciones en las cuales los estudiantes estén buscando activamente
construir un significado.
2. Para construir “un significado” se requiere comprender todas las partes: globales y
específicas (“fromwholetoparts”). Ambas partes deben entenderse en el contexto del
todo. Por lo tanto, el proceso de aprendizaje se enfoca en los conceptos primarios en
contexto y no en hechos aislados.
3. Para enseñar bien, debemos entender los modelos mentales que los estudiantes
utilizan para percibir el mundo y las presunciones que ellos hacen para apoyar dichos
modelos.
4. El propósito del aprendizaje, es para un individuo, el construir su propio significado,
y no sólo el memorizar las respuestas “correctas” y repetir el significado de otra
persona. Como la educación es intrínsecamente interdisciplinaria, la única forma
válida para asegurar el aprendizaje es hacer de la evaluación
5. parte esencial de dicho proceso, asegurando de que ésta provea a los estudiantes con
información sobre la calidad de su aprendizaje.
6. La evaluación debe servir como una herramienta de auto-análisis.
7. Proveer herramientas y ambientes que ayuden a los estudiantes a interpretar las
múltiples perspectivas que existen en el mundo.
8. El aprendizaje debe ser controlado internamente y analizado por el estudiante.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes20
STUDY GUIDE
Course Title: Policing and Judicial Changes
Code: CRJU 540
Credits: 3
Time Length: 5 weeks
Pre-requisite: None
Description:
Study of the dynamics surrounding the role of the police and the operational changes
caused by the legislative and judicial interpretations. It will analyze the effect this has on
the criminal investigation and the way they affect the rights of people who commit
crimes.
General Content Objectives:
At the end of course, the student will be able to:
1. Know, Understand, and Explain the police “policing” function.
2. Analyze, based on court decisions, operational changes, and adjustments that
have to be developed by the police, when courts issue opinions that vary
dramatically, usual course of operations in the field of research, and
intervention with citizens.
3. Study the impact of new court decisions and case law in the following processes:
identification of suspects, arrests, search & seizure, court hearings, rules of
criminal procedure, rules of evidence, legislation amending the criminal law
and / or create new crimes, any situations rising from the application of the
Traffic Law and other functions of prevention, care and protection of life and
property.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes21
4. Describe the constitutional amendments directly related to changes on police
operation and case law that has impacted the role of the police.
5. Understand the investigative procedures used by the police, the limitations in their
diligence in the field and potential legal disputes that may arise in their
employment as required by law.
6. Consider the social and technological changes nationally and globally and to
project how these could affect the future role of the police nationwide.
General Language Objectives:
a. Listening: Understand the function and operation of the police.
b. Speaking: Discuss and analyze the various court decisions that affect the daily
operation of the police, and possible constitutional conflicts that have led tothe
creation of these rules.
c. Reading: Analyze data related to the role of the police, court decisions affecting
the operation of the police, and its implementation through different research
methods used by the system.
d. Writing: Draft documents relating to the themes of the role of the police as well
as, on the effect of judicial decisions in daily operations and future importance
nationally and globally arising from the different social and technological
changes.
E-Lab (Language Lab) Requirements (Tell Me More, Net Tutor, Wimba Voice, Virtual
Library, & Voice E-mail.)
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes22
� Language Lab Minimum Requirement: Students must demonstrate that they
have complied with the hours of language lab or e-lab usage for each language
(English and Spanish) per course. The facilitator may require a higher number of
hours for language lab practice based on the language needs for listening,
speaking, reading, and writing skills in either or both languages. The total
amount of language lab or e-lab hours is integrated in the activities for each
workshop in the module.
Description of the Evaluation Process:
Criteria Workshop Appendix Percentage
Attendance 1-5 15%
Test 5 15%
Written assignments 1-5 20%
Class discussions 1-5 10%
Oral Presentations 3,5 15%
Digital portfolio 1-5 See the manual 5%
Final Research Project 5 20%
Total 100%
Attendance
Attendance and class participation – (Workshops 1 and 3 – Spanish; Workshops 2 and 4 -
English; Workshop 5 – English/Spanish) (Appendix H)
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes23
a. Attendance to every workshop is mandatory. The student will receive 15 points per
class. Absences will affect the final grade. The following criteria will also be evaluated:
b. Mastery of the material discussed in class.
c. Completion of assigned work.
d. Turn work in on time.
Attendance is requisite in order to pass the class.
Test
A test will be administered in the last workshop (5). The test should be written in both
languages, Spanish and English (50% and 50%). The format of the test may be objective,
short questions or essay questions at the discretion of the facilitator. The answers on
correct answers on the test will demonstrate mastery of the content and language skills
required in this course.
Grading Scale:
The following grading scale will be applied to the test:
100 – 90% A
89 – 80% B
79 – 70% C
69 – 60% D
Reflective Journal
The Reflective Journal must be written in English in a narrative essay form, one page
long, in APA style on a weekly basis. The reflective journal is a continuous narrative
where the student will write everything that documents the growth of his/her knowledge
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes24
in class. The journals will be part of the digital portfolio grade and should be included
inside the portfolio. (Refer to the Digital Performance Portfolio Handbook.)
Analytical Essays (Workshops 1, 2, 3, 4,5 – Appendix F)
a. The essays will be about the following topics:
� Analytical APA essay, written in Spanish, where the students will explain the
different roles of the police as a government entity. It must include a discussion
from the origin of the police to their security and political role as the law
enforcement authority. The essay will be submitted in workshop one.
� APA Essay, written in English, that summarizes the case assigned. The essay
must include a narrative of the facts, controversy of the case, court decision and
reasoning of the court. It will be submitted in the second workshop.
� APA essay that discusses the last ten years of technology advances used by the
police through their criminal investigations and the possible constitutional
challenges that this new technology may bring using the following U.S. Bill of
Rights Amendments: IV, V, VI, VII, VIII and XIV. The essay should include a
minimum of two (2) pages and must be submitted in workshop three.
� APA rules about undercover operations under federal agencies (FBI), the protocol
in place, in terms of authorization, monitoring, and control of these operations.
Also, the students should include an analysis of the constitutional and legal issues
that may take place in these sensitive operations. The essay must include a
minimum of three (3) pages and should be submitted in workshop four (4).
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes25
� APA essay, in Spanish, that discusses the assigned crime. Students must refer to
Appendix I to complete this essay. The essay must include a minimum of four (4)
pages and it will be submitted in workshop five (5).
Final Written Report and Oral Report
Each student will prepare an essay with a minimum of four (4) pages related to the the
new modality of crime assigned. Both exercises can be individual and/or in a group
depending upon the size of the class and the facilitator’s indications. The report must
include the following topics:
� Brief description of the crime together with it elements.The elements of a crime are a
series of components which must be present in order for it to be demonstrated that
someone is guilty of a crime.
� The development and different modalities, if more than one, of that specific crime.
� The government agencies and departments that have the duty with the control and
monitoring of that crime (state agencies [Florida only] and federal agencies).
� Research and evaluation of new case law and its influence at an operational level in
the control and monitoring of the assigned crime.
� All other efforts and adjustments at all levels (state and federal) made by law
enforcement to effectively investigate and control the occurrence of the assigned
crime.
� Evaluation of the laws and available recourses of law enforcement to effectively
manage and control the occurrence of the assigned crime.
� What would you do differently to create a better enforcement and control of that
specific crime?
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes26
o Include examples of financial, operational, and infrastructure resources
that will be needed to be put in place in order to control that crime
occurrence. Also, include any other resources that, from your point of
view, should be included.
� What are the economic and political consequences of this crime at a national and
local level?
In preparation for this topic, a minimum of three (3) reliable sources of information
must be used. Remember that your work must be original and appropriate credit should
be given to the original source. The report will be evaluated using Appendixes A, B and
F.
The final project will include an oral presentation developed on PowerPoint. The
facilitator will indicate the length of the presentation will depend on the size of the class.
The oral presentation will be evaluated using Appendix C. The written part of the final
Project will be written in Spanish and the oral presentation will be in English to comply
with the bilingual format of Workshop 5. (Refer to Appendix I for further instructions
and topics.)
Digital Portfolio
Each student must prepare a digital portfolio. Prior to the first workshop, the facilitator
must upload the last edition of the official Digital Performance Portfolio Assessment
Manual to Blackboard. During the first workshop, the facilitator must discuss in detail
the process and expectations of the use of the digital portfolio to demonstrate linguistic
and academic progress to achieve the goal of becoming a dual language professional.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes27
Grading Scale:
The following grading scale will be applied in this course:
100 – 90% A
89 – 80% B
79 – 70% C
69 – 60% D
59 – 0% F
Book(s)
Jeffery, Walker & Craig, Hemmens. (2011). Legal Guide for Police: Constitutional
Issues (9th ed.). Burlington MA: Anderson Publishing. ISBN:978-1-4377-5588-
6. Precioestimado: $35.00.
Burns G. Ronald & Crawford, Charles (2002).Policing and Violence(Revised ed.). New
Jersey, New York: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 0-13-028437-8. Estimated Price: $55.00.
E-Book (s)
Judicial Process: Law, Courts, and Politics in the United. (2013)
http://books.google.com/books?id=x7fOVPmlS4MC&pg=PA247&dq=police+an
d+judicial+changes+in+the+US&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NwdvUefxM5SC8AS_2ICw
BQ&sqi=2&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=police%20and%20judicial%2
0changes%20in%20the%20US&f=false Estimated Price: Free–Google Books
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes28
Description of Course Policies
1. This course follows the SistemaUniversitario Ana G. Méndez, Inc. Discipline-Based
Dual Language Immersion Model® designed to promote each student’s
development as a Dual Language Professional. Workshops will be facilitated in
either English or Spanish, strictly using the 50/50 model. This means that each
workshop will be conducted entirely in the language specified for the workshop. The
language used in each workshop needs to be alternated to insure that 50% of the
course is conducted in English and 50% in Spanish. To maintain this balance, the
course module will indicate that both languages must be used during the fifth
workshop, dividing the workshop activities between the two languages. The first
twohours will be in Spanish and the last two hours in English. The 50/50 model
does not apply to language courses where the delivery of instruction must be
conducted in the language taught (Spanish or English only).
2. The course is conducted in an accelerated and dual language format. This requires
that students prepare in advance for each workshop according to the course module.
Students must be structured, organized, committed, and focused to ensure linguistic
and academic success. In order to achieve proficiency expectations in English and in
Spanish, the student must strive to take advantage of all language resources in the
university and in their community since becoming a dual language professional is a
complex and challenging task. Each workshop requires an average of ten hours of
preparation, but could require more.
3. Attendance to all class sessions is mandatory. A student who is absent to a workshop
must present a reasonable excuse to the facilitator who in turn will evaluate the reason
for the absence. If it is justified, the facilitator will decide how the student will make
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes29
up the missing work, if applicable. The facilitator will decide on the following: allow
the student to make up the work, or allow the student to make up the work and assign
extra work to compensate for the missing class time.
Assignments required prior to the workshop must be completed and turned in on the
assigned date. The facilitator may decide to adjust the grade given for late
assignments and/or make-up work.
4. If a student is absent to more than one workshop, the facilitator will have the
following options:
a. If a student misses two workshops, the facilitator may lower one grade
level based on the student’s existing grade.
b. If the student misses three workshops, the facilitator may lower two
grade levels based on the student’s existing grade.
5. Student attendance and participation in oral presentations and special class activities
are extremely important as it is not possible to assure that they can be made up. If the
student provides a valid and verifiable excuse, the facilitator may determine a
substitute evaluation activity if he/she understands that an equivalent activity is
possible. This activity must include the same content and language components as the
oral presentation or special activity that was missed.
6. In cooperative learning activities, the group will be assessed for their final work as a
group. However, each member will have to collaborate to assure the success of the
group. Students will also receive an individual grade for their work.
7. It is expected that all written work will be solely that of the student and should not be
plagiarized. That is, the student must be the author of all work submitted. All quoted
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes30
or paraphrased material must be properly cited, with credit given to its author or
publisher. It should be noted that plagiarized writings are easily detectable and
students should not risk losing credit for material that is clearly not their own.
SafeAssignTM, a Blackboard plagiarism deterrent service, will be used by the
facilitators to verify students’ ownership of written assignments.It is the student’s
responsibility to read the university’s plagiarism policy. If you are a UT student, read
Section 11.1 of the Student Manual, and if you belong to UMET or UNE, refer to
Chapter 13, Sections 36 and 36.1 of the respective manuals.
Ethical behavior is expected from the students in all course related activities. This
means that ALL papers submitted by the student must be original work, and that all
references used will be properly cited or mentioned in the bibliography. Plagiarism
will not be tolerated and, in case of detecting an incidence, the student will obtain a
zero in the assignment or activity and could be referred to the Discipline Committee.
8. In order for the Facilitator to make changes to activities and the study guide, the
Faculty and Curriculum Director must approve such changes before the first day of
class. The Facilitator must discuss the approved changes with students in the first
class workshop. A written copy of the changes must also be provided to students at
the beginning of the first workshop.
9. The facilitator will establish a means of contacting students by providing the SUAGM
e-mail address, phone number, hours to be contacted, and days available.
10. The use of cellular phones is prohibited during sessions; if there is a need to have one,
it must be on vibrate or silent mode during class session.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes31
11. Children or family members that are not registered in the course are not allowed to
the classrooms.
12. All students are subject to the policies regarding behavior at the university
community established by the institution, and in this course.
Note: If for any reason you cannot access the URL’s presented in the module, notify the
facilitator immediately but do not stop your investigation. There are many search engines
and other links you can use to search for information. These are some examples:
• www.google.com
• www.ask.com
• www.pregunta.com
• www.findarticles.com
• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu
• www.eric.ed.gov/
• www.flelibrary.org/
• http://www.apastyle.org/
To buy or rent new or used textbooks or references you can visit:
• http://www.chegg.com/(rent)
• http://www.bookswim.com/ (rent)
• http://www.allbookstores.com/ (buy)
• http://www.alibris.com/(buy)
The facilitator may make changes or add additional challenging, research-based, and
professional educational Web Resources, if deemed necessary to reflect current trends in
the course topics.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes32
RESEARCH LAW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT:
If the facilitator or the student is required, or wants to perform a research, or needs
to administer a questionnaire or an interview individuals, he/she must comply with
the norms and procedures of the Institutional Review Board Office (IRB) and ask
for authorization. To access the forms from the IRB Office or for additional
information, visit the following link:
http://www.suagm.edu/ac_aa_re_ofi_formularios.asp and select the forms needed.
Furthermore, in this Web site the student/facilitator will find instructions for
several online certifications related to IRB processes. These certifications include:
IRB Institutional Review Board, Health Information Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA), and the Responsibility Conduct for Research Act (RCR).
If you have any questions, please contact the following institutional coordinators:
Mrs. Evelyn Rivera Sobrado, Director of IRB Office (PR)
Tel. (787) 751-0178 Ext. 7196
Miss. Carmen Crespo, IRB Institutional Coordinator– UMET
Tel. (787) 766-1717 Ext. 6366
Sra. Josefina Melgar, IRB Institutional Coordinator – Turabo
Tel. (787) 743-7979 Ext.4126
Rebecca Cherry, Ph.D., IRB Institutional Coordinator - UNE
Tel. (787) 257-7373 Ext. 3936
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes33
Teaching Philosophy and Methodology
The activities for the course reflect the educational philosophy of Constructivism.
Constructivism is an educational philosophy founded on the premise that, by reflecting
on our experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world in which we live.
Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make sense
of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply the process of adjusting our mental
models to accommodate new experiences.
One of the main goals facilitators have is assisting students in making connections
between their prior knowledge of facts, and fostering new understanding that is relevant
to real live experiences. We will also attempt to tailor our teaching strategies to student
responses and encourage students to analyze, interpret, and predict information.
CONSTRUCTIVISM GUIDING PRINCIPLES:
1. Learning is a search for meaning. Therefore, learning must start with the issues
around which students are actively trying to construct meaning.
2. Meaning requires understanding “wholes” as well as “parts”. The “parts” must be
understood in the context of “wholes”. Therefore, the learning process focuses on
primary concepts, not isolated facts.
3. In order to teach well, we must understand the mental models that students use to
perceive the world, and the assumptions they make to support those models.
4. The purpose of learning is for an individual to construct his or her own meaning, not
just memorize the "right" answers and regurgitate someone else's meaning. Since
education is inherently interdisciplinary, the only valuable way to measure learning is
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes34
to make assessment part of the learning process, thus ensuring that it provides
students with information on the quality of their learning.
5. Evaluation should serve as a self-analysis tool.
6. Provide tools and environments that help learners interpret the multiple perspectives
of the world.
7. Learning should be internally controlled and mediated by the learner.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes35
TALLER UNO
Objetivos específicos de contenido
Al finalizar el taller, los estudiantes serán capaces de:
1. Comprender la función pública de la policía (“policing”).
2. Conocer la trayectoria histórica y evolución de agencias de orden públicoen el
ámbito federal con referencias comparativas a las (organizaciones estatales y
locales) de Florida.
3. Identificar los diferentes departamentos que forman y ayudan a llevar a ejecutar la
función de la policía.
Objetivos específicos de lenguaje
Al finalizar el taller, los estudiantes serán capaces de:
1. Escuchar: Entender la función pública de la policía.
2. Hablar: Discutir los conceptos que fundamentan la historia y evolución del orden
público y la policía.
3. Leer: Resumir la función y estructura organizacional agencias de orden público a
nivel federal y estatal.
4. Escribir: Elaborar un escrito donde se discuta la función de la policía como
fuerza de seguridad encargada de mantener el orden público y como departamento
de gobierno encargado de que se cumplan las leyes dispuestas por el estado o
nación.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes36
Enlaces electrónicos
Biblioteca virtual
http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/
APA
http://www.suagm.edu/umet/biblioteca/pdf/guia_apa_6ta.pdf
http://www.slideshare.net/myrrodriguez/manual-estilo-apa-6ta-edicin
Glosario Definiciones
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/political+science
http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195123715.001.0001/acref-
9780195123715
US Government History:
http://www.usa.gov/Citizen/Topics/History-American.shtml
Documentos Históricosy Archivos en General
http://www.usa.gov/Topics/Reference-Shelf/Documents.shtml
http://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/
http://www.ushistory.org/documents/
Asignaciones antes del taller
1. Lea el módulo cuidadosamente y venga preparado para aclarar cualquier duda en
referencia al mismo ya sea, temas, tareas o evaluación de ser necesario.
2. Lea los enlaces electrónicos recomendados y otros materiales de referencia para la
discusión en clase. Lea cuidadosamente el contenido de este taller establecido por
los objetivos específicos y las matrices valorativas ya que se utilizarán para
evaluar su conocimiento, participación y habilidades lingüísticas.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes37
3. Investigue el vocabulario clave del taller en la red electrónica y elabore un
glosario para entregar con el vocabulario clave de la lección.
4. Elaboré un Ensayo analíticosiguiendo el modeloAPA donde se expliquen todas
las facetas o funciones de la policía. El ensayo debe incluir una discusión
profunda acerca de las funciones de la policía desde la función de seguridad hasta
su función gubernamental y política como entidad encargada de velar por el
cumplimiento de la ley.
5. Leer información acerca de la historia del orden público en los Estados Unidos
6. Investigar y organizar una gráfica donde se señalen los diferentes departamentos
de ley y ordende la Florida(Estatal, Condado y Ciudad) y las funciones
principales de cada uno de esos departamentos.
7. Laboratorio de Idiomas/Laboratorio Electrónico: Tome el examen de
ubicación de idiomas del programa TELL ME MORE y realice los ejercicios
interactivos en el Laboratorio de idiomas de acuerdo al nivel de inglés y de
español que Ud. haya recibido. Entregue el formulario del Laboratorio de Idiomas
firmado asegurando que Ud. ha hecho los ejercicios asignados a su nivel por
semana.
Vocabulario clave de la lección
1.Policía
2.Agencia Federal
3.Policía Estatal
4.Oficina del Alguacil(Sheriff’s Office)
5.“Policing”
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes38
Lista de materiales suplementarios para el taller
1. Organizador gráfico KWL
2. Glosario de la lección
3. Material investigado
4. Caballete de Hojas Sueltas
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes39
Componentes de SIOP(ShelteredInstructionObservationProtocol): La “X” en la línea
indica las estrategias de enseñanza que se utilizarán para ayudar a los estudiantes a
mejorar su dominio de destrezas de lenguaje y académicas en cada clase.
A. Preparación de la lección B.Scaffolding _X_ Adaptación del contenido _X_ Modelaje _X_ Enlaces con el conocimiento previo _X_ Práctica dirigida _X_ Enlaces con el aprendizaje previo _X_ Práctica independiente _X_ Estrategias incorporadas _X_ Instrucción comprensible Estrategias de CALLA(Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) El facilitador debe especificar la estrategia(s) que usará en cada lección y explicarlas a los estudiantes. _X_ Cognitiva 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _X_ Metacognitiva 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _X_ Socioafectiva 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________
C. Opciones de agrupamientoD. Integración del proceso
_X_ Grupo completo _X_ Escuchar _X_ Grupos pequeños _X_ Hablar _X_ Trabajo en parejas _X_ Leer _X_ Trabajo independiente _X_ Escribir E. Aplicación (Actividades)
_X_ Dinámicas _X_ Significativas y relevantes _X _Rigurosas _X_ Vinculadas a los objetivos _X_ Promueven la participación
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes40
Actividades integradas
1. El facilitador realizará un ejercicio rompe hielo para que el grupo se conozca.
2. El facilitador discutirá los objetivos y la evaluación del curso. Asimismo,
explicará y aclarará las dudas sobre el curso, el módulo y su uso.
3. El facilitador invitará a los estudiantes a completar las dos primeras columnas del
organizador gráfico K-W-L sobre su conocimiento existente y lo que desean saber
sobre el tema de aprendizaje de este taller.
4. El facilitador desarrollará una corta presentación donde explicará el trasfondo
histórico de los Derechos Humanos.
5. Los estudiantes discutirán junto al facilitador las palabras del vocabulario clave de
la lección.
6. En grupos pequeños, los estudiantes discutiránsus análisis en referencia a las
diferentes fases o funciones de las agencias de orden público y ofrecerán,
ejemplos de cada una. Los ejemplos serán presentados al resto de la clase a la vez,
que señalan los puntos más importantes de su análisis grupal.
7. El facilitador y los estudiantes discutirán las gráficas que describen la
organización de las agencias de orden público enFlorida.
8. El facilitador explicará la organización de los diferentes cuerpos del orden público
a nivel federal.
9. Los estudiantes de forma individual compararán la organización de agencias
orden público federales con la organización de agencias de orden públicoestatales
y buscarán semejanzas y diferencias entre ambas. Los análisis serán discutidos en
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes41
mesa redonda con el facilitador. Cada estudiante debe entregar una hoja con su
análisis al facilitador.
10. El facilitador repasará de forma general los conceptos discutidos y contestará
cualquier pregunta o duda en referencia al tema.
11. El facilitador discutirá las tareas para el próximo taller además, de asignar el tema
a cada estudiante para las presentaciones del próximo taller.
Evaluación
1. Individual: Los estudiantes redactarán su diario reflexivo acerca del contenido
del taller. Referirse al manual del portafolio digital.
2. Grupal:Los estudiantes participarán en la discusión acerca de las diferentes
funciones o facetas de las agencias de orden publico
3. Escrita: Los estudiantes analizarán de forma escrita las semejanzas y diferencias
entre la organización de la policía federal y la policía estatal.
4. Oral/Auditiva:Los estudiantes presentarán en alta voz sus análisis con sus
ejemplos acerca de la funciones o facetas de las agencias de orden público
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes42
Cierre del taller
1. Individual:Los estudiantes participarán en una actividad denominada “Saquen el
boleto,” en la cual tendrán la oportunidad de resumir lo que han aprendido en este
taller, reflexionar sobre qué significa para ellos lo aprendido, relacionarlo con lo
que saben, considerar cómo aplicarlo y pensar qué esperan aprender en el taller
próximo.Para esta actividad utilizarán la tabla K-W-L y completarán la última
columna.
2. Grupal:Los estudiantes prepararán un programa noticioso informando lo que
aprendieron en este taller.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes43
WORKSHOP TWO
Specific Content Objectives
At the end of the workshop, students will be able to:
1. Identify the US Constitutional Amendments that are directly related to the field of
Law Enforcement.
2. Understand the effect of the selected US Constitutional Amendments to the field of
Law Enforcement.
3. Know the court decisions and case law that has impacted Law Enforcement functions.
Specific Language Objectives
At the end of the workshop, students will be able to:
1. Listening: Validate the importance of the US Constitutional Amendments on Law
Enforcement functions.
2. Speaking: Discuss and identify key cases that set the scenario for judicial decisions
and new procedures.
3. Reading: Summarize research-based information on cases.
4. Writing: Develop a document where the student will analyze and summarize
jurisprudence that created changes in police work operational performance.
Electronic Links (URLs)
Virtual library
http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/
APA
http://www.apastyle.org/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes44
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
US Constitution
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/
US Bill of Rights
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/ConstitutionResources/LegalLandmarks/
LandmarkSupremeCourtCases.aspx
Assignments before the Workshop
1. Review and Summarize the following Amendments of the US Bill of Rights:
a. Amendment IV
b. Amendment V
c. Amendment VI
d. Amendment VII
e. Amendment VIII
f. Amendment XIV
2. Prepare an Essay along with an oral presentation using Power Point. The essay
should summarize the case assigned. The case summary must include:
a. The parties of the case
b. Facts of the case ( Students shall use their own words)
c. Controversy or Question to the court
d. Decision, and the arguments used by the court to support the decision.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes45
e. Immediate impact on Law Enforcement operations or case significance for
law enforcement operational function.
*Please refer to Appendix G to see the list of available cases for the
exercise. The facilitator may add or eliminate cases as needed depending
on the size of the class.
3. Search for the definitions of the core vocabulary words on the Internet and other
printed resources (E-lab activity).
4. Language Lab/E-Lab:Continue working on completing the twenty hours (20)
hours of the language lab.
Core Vocabulary
1. U.S. Constitution
2. Bill of Rights
3. Amendments to the Constitution
4. Common Law
5. Case Law
6. Controversy (legal case)
List of Supplementary Materials for the Workshop
1. Core Words Glossary
2. Field-Related Literature(Cases)
3. PowerPoint presentations
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes46
SIOP Components (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol):The “X” on the line
indicates the teaching strategies that will be used in each class to support and increase
students’ linguistic and academic performance.
A. Lesson Preparation B. Scaffolding _X_ Adaptation of Content _X_ Modeling _X_ Links to Background Knowledge X__ Guided Practice _X Links to Past Learning X__ Independent Practice _X_ Strategies Incorporated X__ Comprehensible Input CALLA Strategies (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) The facilitator must specify the CALLA learning strategy/strategies that will be used in the lesson and explain each one to the students. X__ Cognitive 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ X__ Metacognitive 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _X_ Social/Affective 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________
C. Grouping Options D. Integration of Processes _X_ Whole Group _X_ Listening _X_ Small Group _X_ Speaking __ Partners _X_ Reading _X_ Independent Work _X_ Writing E. Application (Activities) _X_ Dynamic _X_ Meaningful/Relevant _X_ Rigorous _X_ Linked to Objectives
_X_ Promote Engagement
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes47
Integrated Activities
1. The facilitator will lead a review activity on Workshop One.
2. The facilitator will guide a group discussion of the core vocabulary words and its
relevance to the workshop topic.
3. The facilitator will explain the structure of the U.S. Constitution and the
importance of the U.S. Bill of Rights to the field of law enforcement.
4. The students, in pairs, will be assigned by the facilitator, a selected Amendment
from the Bill of Rights. Each pair should discuss their summary about the main
points of the assigned amendment and discuss their findings with the class.
5. Using a PowerPoint presentation, the facilitator will explain to the students what
“case law” means and how judicial decisions become law based in the Common
Law system of the United States.
6. The students will present their oral presentations about the cases.
7. In groups, with different cases, the students will review their own assigned court
case against the other members of the group. Each group should create a common
listing of the specific amendment challenges in each case and the reasoning that
the court used to solve the case.
8. The students, together with the facilitator, in a round table discussion, will
analyze each group’s findings from the prior exercise and will create a graph that
summarizes all the information discussed.
9. The facilitator will clarify any remaining questions or doubts about the workshop
and discuss the homework for the next workshop.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes48
Assessment
1. Individual: Students will write their self-reflection on the content of the
workshop. They must refer to the Digital Performance Portfolio Assessment
Handbook for the template pertaining to this activity.
2. Group: Students will debate the importance of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill
of Rights.
3. Written: Students will discuss the cases to create a list of court decisions that
have modified federal and state laws.
4. Oral: The students will discuss each case to learn about the court reasoning and
decisions.
Lesson Wrap-Up
1. Individual: Students will complete an individual graph that highlights each
relevant court reasoning and court decision.
2. Group: In small groups the students will discuss a new concept or idea learned in
the workshop. Finally, students will share their reflection with the whole class.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes49
TALLER TRES
Objetivos específicos de contenido
Al finalizar el taller, los estudiantes serán capaces de:
1. Identificar los diferentes avances tecnológicos utilizados por las agencias de orden
público durante la investigación criminal.
2. Demostrar conocimiento sobre los retos constitucionales que puedan surgir a raíz
del uso de la nueva tecnología.
3. Conocer el Título II (2) del “USA PATRIOT Act” y como esté afecta el proceso
de investigación en cuanto a las labores de vigilancia a nivel federal.
Objetivos específicos de lenguaje
Al finalizar el taller, los estudiantes serán capaces de:
1. Escuchar: Entender las función y uso de los diferentes avances tecnológicos
durante la etapa de investigación criminal.
2. Hablar: Describir los diferentes retos constitucionales que puedan surgir por el
uso de la nueva tecnología.
3. Leer: Clasificar los diferentes artículos que componen el Título 2 del “USA
PatriotAct”
4. Escribir: Resumirán la importancia y función del “USA Patriot Act”, Título 2, a
nivel federal.
Enlaces electrónicos
Biblioteca Virtual
http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/
APA
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes50
http://www.suagm.edu/umet/biblioteca/pdf/guia_apa_6ta.pdf
http://www.slideshare.net/myrrodriguez/manual-estilo-apa-6ta-edicin
Bill of Rights
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
USA Patriot Act
http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm
Core Vocabulary
http://www.britannica.com/
http://www.encyclopedia.com/
Asignaciones antes del taller
1. Investigue y desarrolle un ensayo estilo APA donde describa los diferentes
avances tecnológicos utilizados por la policía en los últimos 10 años en el proceso
de investigación a nivel federal y estatal. Luego, analicé e integrede acuerdo con
la discusión de las Enmiendas de la Carta del Ciudadano de los Estados Unidos,
“Bill of Rights”(Enmiendas IV, V, VI, VII, VIII y XIV) llevada a cabo durante el
taller anterior (Taller 2) cual o cuales se afectarían por el uso de la nueva
tecnología. Este ensayo debe ser entregado y el mismo debe contener un mínimo
de dos (2) páginas.
2. Investigue las definiciones de las palabras del vocabulario clave del taller y
elabore un glosario (laboratorio electrónico).
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes51
3. Desarrolle una gráfica donde se explique la función, importancia de los diferentes
artículos que componen el Título 2 del “USA Patriot Act”. La gráfica será para
entregar.
4. Laboratorio de Idiomas/Laboratorio Electrónico: Complete horas para ser
registradas en el registro de horas del laboratorio de idiomas.
Vocabulario clave de la lección
1. USA Patriot Act
2. Investigación criminal
3. Poder de Vigilancia ( Agentes/Policía)
4. Telecomunicaciones privadas
5. Comunicaciones electrónicas
6. Ordenes de Vigilancia (“Surveillance Warrants”)
Lista de materiales suplementarios para el taller
1. Vocabulario de la lección
2. Material de lectura suplementario
3. Caballete de Hojas Sueltas (“Easel Pad”)
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes52
Componentes de SIOP (ShelteredInstructionObservationProtocol):La “X” en la línea indica las estrategias de enseñanza que se utilizarán para ayudar a los estudiantes a mejorar su dominio de destrezas de lenguaje y académicas en cada clase.
A. Preparación de la lección B.Scaffolding _X_ Adaptación del contenido _X Modelaje _X_ Enlaces con el conocimiento previo _X_ Práctica dirigida _X Enlaces con el aprendizaje previo _X Práctica independiente _X_ Estrategias incorporadas X__ Instrucción comprensible Estrategias de CALLA(Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) El facilitador debe especificar la estrategia(s) que usará en cada lección y explicarlas a los estudiantes. _X_ Cognitiva 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _XMetacognitiva 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _X_ Socioafectiva 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________
C. Opciones de agrupamientoD. Integración del proceso
_X_ Grupo completo _X_ Escuchar _X_ Grupos pequeños _X_ Hablar _X_ Trabajo en parejas _X_ Leer _X_ Trabajo independiente _X_ Escribir E. Aplicación (Actividades)
_X_ Dinámicas _X_ Significativas y relevantes _X _Rigurosas _X_ Vinculadas a los objetivos _X_ Promueven la participación
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes53
Actividades Integradas
1. Los estudiantes repasarán el contenido del taller anterior usando la actividad
llamada “Células de aprendizaje.” Para esta actividad, los estudiantes
desarrollarán preguntas acerca del taller anterior y luego trabajarán con un
compañero, haciendo y respondiendo preguntas alternadamente.
2. El facilitador guiará una discusión acerca del uso de la tecnología y el trabajo
investigativo de la policía. Además, de explicar la importancia de la tecnología y
los cambios en forma general, que la misma ha llevado al procedimiento de la
investigación criminal.
3. El facilitador dividirá a los estudiantes en cinco (5) grupos donde se discutirán
los avances tecnológicos de los últimos (diez) años y el efecto de esta nueva
tecnología sobre las enmiendas de la Constitución que protegen los derechos de
los ciudadanos “Bill of Rights” como fue asignado en las tareas del taller. Una
vez los estudiantes discutirán sus hallazgos en torno a la comisión asignada
elaborarán una presentación sencilla donde comunicarán sus hallazgos al resto del
grupo.
4. El facilitador ofrecerá una discusión breve en referencia al origen y propósito
general del “Patriot Act” además, de introducir el Título 2 del acta.
5. Utilizando un organizador gráfico, el facilitador junto a los estudiantes dividirán
el Titulo 2 del “Patriot Act” en sus diferentes artículos que lo componen.
6. En grupos los estudiantes y utilizando el organizador gráfico desarrollado
discutirán los artículos asignados a cada grupo por el facilitador y definirán el
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes54
propósito y relevancia de dicho artículo en la función investigativa de la policía
federal y estatal.
7. El facilitador conducirá una sesión de torbellino de ideas para explorar si existe la
posibilidad de añadir o eliminar otros artículos de ley bajo el Título 2 del “Patriot
Act” además, explicar el efecto de los correspondientes artículos en los derechos
del acusado o sospechoso.
8. El facilitador asignará los temas a discutirse en el proyecto final, “The Crimes of
the New Millenium”. Los temas serán asignados a discreción del facilitador y se
presentarán en el quinto taller.
9. El facilitador discutirá las tareas para el próximo taller.
Evaluación
1. Individual: Los estudiantes redactarán su diario reflexivo acerca del contenido
del taller. Refiérase al manual del portafolio digital para una plantilla del diario.
2. Grupal: Los estudiantes analizarán los avances tecnológicos en conjunto con las
seleccionadas enmiendas constitucionales y analizarán el efecto de la tecnología
en la preservación de la privacidad y otros derechos básicos garantizados por la
constitución.
3. Escrita: Los estudiantes prepararán una gráfica con los artículos más importantes
del Título 2 del “Patriot Act” en referencia a la labor policiaca de vigilancia e
investigación. También, definirán por escrito la relevancia y propósito de los
artículos del Título 2 del “Patriot Act”.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes55
4. Oral/Auditiva: Los estudiantes participarán en la discusión de diferentes ideas
que puedan surgir en el futuro como posibles artículos para ser incluidos en el
Título 2 del U.S.A “PatriotAct” por el gobierno. Además, de discutir los efectos
de estos artículos en los derechos del acusado o sospechoso.
Cierre del taller
1. Individual: Cada estudiante discutirá con el compañero que se encuentre a su
lado los tópicos más importantes del taller.
2. Grupal:En pequeños grupos losestudiantes participarán en la
actividadCongresista por un minuto. Cada grupo tratará de acuerdo a la discusión
de los derechos de los acusados o sospechoso de definir posibles áreas donde sería
factible crear nueva legislación para lograr una más amplia protección al acusado
o sospechoso frente a la creciente amplitud de la capacidad investigativa de la
policía.
Para esta actividad los estudiantes pueden utilizar el formato siguiente:
1. Nuestro área se trata:_________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
2. Nuestro equipo concluyo que se podría ampliar los derechos de los acusados o
sospechosos de la siguiente manera:___________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes56
_____________________________________________________________________
3. Como ayudaría esta posible legislación a mantener una sociedad más segura en
términos de seguridad, función primordial de los cuerpos de orden y como a su vez
protegemos a los ciudadanos de los excesos de control del
gobierno:________________________________________________________________
________
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
4. Nuestra discusión demostró: ______________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes57
WORKSHOP FOUR
Specific Content Objectives
At the end of the workshop, students will be able to:
1. Know how “undercover operations”work from the authorizing, monitoring, and
control processes to legal aspects.
2. Understand the concept of “entrapment”, how will this affect the undercover
operation and the leading court decisions.
3. Learn what A “Confidential informant” is and the possible challenges that Law
Enforcement can come across when utilizing an informant in criminal
investigations.
4. Understand Law Enforcement work and the possible legal liabilities, immunities,
and defenses under Title 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242,Title 42 U.S.C. Sect. 1983 and
Title XLVI of Florida Law.
Specific Language Objectives
At the end of the workshop, students will be able to:
1. Listening: Understand “undercover operations” authorizing, monitoring, control
processes, and the legal aspects that surround this type of investigative procedure.
2. Speaking: Discuss the challenges of undercover operations, the use of
“Confidential informants”, and the concept of entrapment and Title 18 U.S.C. 241
and 242, Title 42 U.S.C. Sect. 1983 and Title XLVI of Florida Law.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes58
3. Reading: Comprehend the concept of entrapment and the leading court decisions
that serve as a guideline for this defense.
4. Writing: Write a document about “undercover operations” and the legal and
constitutional issues that may arise from that type of investigation. Summarize
theTitle 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242, Title 42 U.S.C. Sect. 1983 and Title XLVI of
Florida Law the elements of a claim under these sections, the defenses and
immunities.
Electronic Links (URLs)
Virtual library
http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/
APA style
http://www.apastyle.org/
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
FBI Undercover Operations
http://vault.fbi.gov/FBI%20Undercover%20Operations%20/FBI%20Undercover%20Ope
rations%20Part%201%20of%201/view
Title 42 U.S.C. Sect. 1983
http://www.constitution.org/brief/forsythe_42-1983.htm
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes59
Assignments before the Workshop
1. Write an analytical essay following APA rules, about undercover operations
under the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the protocol in place in terms
of the authorizing, monitoring, and control of these operations. Also, the students
should include an analysis of the constitutional and legal issues that may take
place in these sensitive operations. The essay must include a minimum of three
(3) pages.
2. Research and be prepared to discuss the “entrapment” concept, defined in your
own words; what it is and how it is used.
3. Read and brief the following two (2) cases:
a. Sherman vs. United States 356 US 369 (1958)
b. United States vs. Russell 411 US 423 (1973)
c. Hampton vs. United States 425 US 484 (1976)
Each case brief shall include the name of the parties involved, a narrative in the
students own words of the facts of the case, the controversy or issue of the case,
and finally, the court decision and reasoning.
5. Summarize in your own words Title 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242, Title 42 U.S.C. Sect.
1983 and Title XLVI of Florida Lawemphasized the elements of a claim under
Section 1983 and the defenses and immunities under both sections.
4. Language Lab/E-Lab: Continue working on completing the twenty (20) hours of
language lab.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes60
Core Vocabulary
1. Undercover operations
2. Undercover activities
3. Undercover employee
4. Informant(documented and undocumented)
5. Entrapment
6. Legal Defenses
7. Legal Immunities
8. Legal claim
9. Elements of a claim
10. Liabilities
11. Civil Liabilities
12. Administrative Liability
13. Criminal Liability
List of Supplementary Materials for the Workshop
1. Supplementary Materials
2. Vocabulary/glossary
3. Case
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes61
SIOP Components (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol):The “X” on the line
indicates the teaching strategies that will be used in each class to support and increase
students’ linguistic and academic performance.
A. Lesson Preparation B. Scaffolding _ XAdaptation of Content X Modeling _X_ Links to Background Knowledge X Guided Practice _X Links to Past Learning X Independent Practice __ XStrategies Incorporated X Comprehensible Input CALLA Strategies (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) The facilitator must specify the CALLA learning strategy/strategies that will be used in the lesson and explain each one to the students. _ X_ Cognitive 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ __ X Metacognitive 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ __ XSocial/Affective 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________
C. Grouping Options D. Integration of Processes _X_ Whole Group _X_ Listening _X_ Small Group _X_ Speaking _X_ Partners _X_ Reading _X_ Independent Work _X_ Writing E. Application (Activities) _X_ Dynamic _X_ Meaningful/Relevant _X_ Rigorous _X_ Linked to Objectives
_X_ Promote Engagement
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes62
Integrated Activities
1. The facilitator, along with the students, will take part in an activity known as
Learning Cells, to review the previous workshop. Students will individually
develop questions about any of the objectives covered in Workshop Three or
other learning activities. Working with a partner, they will alternate asking and
answering each other’s questions.
2. The facilitator will introduce the topic with a brief background of undercover
operations.
3. The students will share with the person next to them their findings about the
possible legal and constitutional issues of the undercover operations. Each group
has to mention at least two (2) legal issues or constitutional challenges, of these
types of investigations.
4. The facilitator will call students at random to present their definitions of
“entrapment.” what it is and how it can be avoided.
5. In groups, the students will present the case briefs assigned. Depending on the
size of the class the facilitator can divide the classroom in two groups to discuss
the cases or can each be assigned a part of the brief from every group.
6. The class will be divided in three (3) groups. Group One will discuss Title 42
U.S.C sect. 1983 elements of a claim and the defenses and immunities. Each will
make a list of the most important points included in the assigned part of the
document, the Title 42 U.S.C. Group two will discuss Title 18 U.S.C. Article 241
& 242 with the defenses and immunities. Group three will discuss Title XLVI of
Florida Law defenses, immunities and liabilities. After the discussion one student
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes63
from each group will read the outcome to the class and everybody, along with the
facilitator, will set up a final listing from each group to be kept by the students as
a reference. *The facilitator may assign different groups depending on class size.
6. Individually each student will receive and read a copy of the case Owen vs. City
of Independence, 445 US 622 (1980). After each student individually reads the
case, the facilitator will divide the class in to three (3) groups to create a case brief
that includes facts, controversy, and court decisions. Once the students complete
the assigned portion of the case they will share it with the rest of the class.
7. The facilitator will lead a general discussion of police legal liability under the
case discussed, Owen vs. City of Providence, and the importance of being aware
of this issues as a criminal justice professional
8. The facilitator will outline and review, with the students, the main topics for the
test. Workshop 5.
9. The facilitator will discuss the homework for the next workshop.
Assessment
1. Individual: Students will write their self-reflection based on the content of the
workshop. They must refer to the Digital Performance Portfolio Assessment
Handbook for a template to complete this activity.
2. Group: Students will analyze different cases on entrapment and legal liability.
3. Written: Students will elaborate a list of the elements on a claim and the
immunities and defenses based on Title 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242, Title 42 U.S.C.
Sect. 1983 and Title XLVI of Florida Law.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes64
4. Oral: Students will explain the cases related to entrapment, the important
elements of a claim under Title 42 U.S.C. Sect. 1983, along with immunities and
defenses described in the code. Also, discuss orally a case on legal liabilities of
police officers. (Same suggestion, try to get criminal liability instead)
Lesson Wrap-Up
1. Individual: Every student will turn to the classmate on their left and share
something they learned in this workshop.
2. Group: Students will participate in an activity known as Simultaneous Round
Table. Divided in small groups, each student will receive a paper and a pencil.
The papers are labeled with a team number (rather than the students’ own
names)the paper will be passed around the group. The teacher will read aloud a
topic covered in this workshop. Students will be given two minutes to respond in
writing to the teacher’s prompt and then they will pass the papers to each group
member four or five times. Each time the paper is passed to a student, he or she
must read what is already on the list and then add additional ideas.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes65
Taller Cinco/Workshop Five
NOTA: Este taller es bilingüe. Tanto, el
Facilitador como los estudiantes, deberán
utilizar el idioma asignado para cada tarea
y actividad. ¡No mezcle los dos idiomas!
UTILICE SOLAMENTE UN IDIOMA
A LA VEZ! Las primeras dos horas
deberán ser en español, y las dos últimas
horas deberán ser en inglés.
NOTE: This is a bilingual workshop.
Both the facilitator and the student must
use the language assigned for each
homework and activity. Do not mix both
languages! USE ONE LANGUAGE AT
A TIME- KEEP BOTH LANGUAGES
SEPARATE!The first two hours must be
in Spanish. The last two hours must be
in English.
Objetivos específicos de contenido
Al finalizar el taller, los estudiantes serán capaces de:
1. Evaluar los crímenes del nuevo milenio y la función de las agencias de orden
público en la lucha y sobre el control de estos crímenes.
2. Entender los efectos operacionales causados por los actos terroristas de
Septiembre 11 en las agencias de orden público tanto a nivel federal como estatal
y local.
3. Comprender el impacto del “USA PATRIOT Act” en lasfunciónes, de las
agencias de orden público federales, estatales y localesen el proceso investigativo
4. Entender el creación desarrollo y estructura organizacional del departamento de
Seguridad Nacional (Homeland Security).
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes66
Objetivos específicos de lenguaje:
Al finalizar el taller, los estudiantes serán capaces de:)
1. Escuchar: Evaluar los retos futuros de las agencias de orden público federales,
estatales y locales en el surgimiento de nuevos crímenes y los factores
operacionales que estas nuevas modalidades imponen a las mismas.
2. Hablar:Analizar la restructuración del gobierno después de los incidentes del
9/11.
3. Leer:Entender los Títulos que modifican el manejo del proceso investigativo bajo
el USA PATRIOT Act y el impacto de esos artículos en la función de las agencias
de orden público.
4. Escribir: Redactar un ensayos analíticos en referencia a los retos futuros de las
agencias de orden público como también, sobre la restructuración del gobierno
después el 9/11 y la creación y desarrollo del departamento de Seguridad
Nacional(Homeland Security).
Enlaces electrónicos:
Biblioteca virtual
http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/
APA
http://www.suagm.edu/umet/biblioteca/pdf/guia_apa_6ta.pdf
http://www.slideshare.net/myrrodriguez/manual-estilo-apa-6ta-edicin
Cyber Crimes
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/cyber
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes67
USA PATRIOT Act
http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm
Homeland Security
http://www.dhs.gov/
Asignaciones antes del taller
Tareas a ser discutidas en las primeras dos (2) horas de instrucción:
1. Investigue y redacte un ensayo APA en español acerca del delito asignado en la
actividad final “Crimes of the New Millenium”. Refiérase al Anejo I para más
detalles en referencia a la estructura del trabajo. El ensayo debe contener un
mínimo de cuatro (4) páginas.
2. Complete un resumen en sus propias palabras que cubra desde el Título 3 hasta el
Título 10 del USA PATRIOT Act”. El resumen debe incluir los diferentes artículos
que componen cada Título del acta y sus objetivos.
3. Prepare una tabla organizacional del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional
(Homeland Security). La tabla debe ser de la creación original del estudiante. La
tabla debe mencionar cada Agencia su función.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes68
Assignments to be discussed during the last two hours of instruction (2):
1. Develop a PowerPoint presentation in English about the “Crimes of the
Millennium.” Please refer to Appendix I for further instructions.
2. Prepare an APA three (3) page essay discussing the government changes after 9/11
in terms of security and the creation/development of the Department of Homeland
Security.
3. Review the concepts discussed in the past workshop for the test.
4. Complete and bring the Digital Performance Portfolio Assessment.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes69
Vocabulario académico clave (Debe
reflejar los objetivos y conceptos claves
del taller.) Verifique que el estudiante
domine el vocabulario clave en los dos
idiomas.
1. Terrorismo
2. Contraterrorismo
3. Lavado de dinero
4. Institución Financiera
5. Crimen Organizado
6. Robo de Identidad
7. Crímenes Cibernéticos
8. Fraude por Computadoras
Academic Core Vocabulary (Must
reflect objectives and important concepts
of the workshop.) Verify that the student
masters the core vocabulary in both
languages.
1. Terrorism
2. Counterterrorism
3. Money Laundering
4. Financial Institution
5. Racketeering
6. Identity Theft
7. Computer Fraud
8. Cyber Crimes
List of Supplementary Materials for the Workshop:
1. Organizational Charts
2. PowerPointPresentations
3. Reading materials
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes70
SIOP Components (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol):The “X” on the line
indicates the teaching strategies that will be used in each class to support and increase
students’ linguistic and academic performance.
A. Lesson Preparation B. Scaffolding _X_ Adaptation of Content _X_ Modeling _X_ Links to Background Knowledge _X_ Guided Practice _X_ Links to Past Learning _X_ Independent Practice _X_ Strategies Incorporated _X_ Comprehensible Input CALLA Strategies (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) The facilitator must specify the CALLA learning strategy/strategies that will be used in the lesson and explain each one to the students. _X_ Cognitive 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _X_ Metacognitive 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________ _X_ Social/Affective 1)_______________________ 2)_______________________
C. Grouping Options D. Integration of Processes _X_ Whole Group _X_ Listening _X_ Small Group _X_ Speaking _X_ Partners _X_ Reading _X_ Independent Work _X_ Writing E. Application (Activities) _X_ Dynamic _X_ Meaningful/Relevant _X_ Rigorous _X_ Linked to Objectives
_X_ Promote Engagement
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes71
Actividades Integradas:
1. El facilitador repasará el material aprendido en el taller anterior y responderá
cualquier pregunta que surja por parte de los estudiantes.
2. El facilitador presentará mediante el uso de PowerPointguiará una discusión
general de los retos que presentan los nuevos crímenes en la función operacional
diaria de la policía a nivel estatal y federal.
3. Los estudiantes se dividirán en grupo para discutir desde el Título 3 hasta el
Título 10 del “USA PATRIOT Act” a cada grupo y según el tamaño se le
asignarán un título para ser discutido en grupo y luego, explicados al resto de la
clase.
4. En mesa redonda durante la discusión de los diferentes títulos del ‘USA
PATRIOT Act” el facilitador se asegurara que los estudiantes comprendan como
estos artículos han cambiado la labor diaria de las agencias de orden público.
Integrated Activities:
1. The facilitator, along with the students, will discuss the government changes after
9/11 and the creation and development of the Department of Homeland Security.
The discussion should be guided to emphasize how these changes impacted the
operational function of federal, state and local law enforcement agenciesThe USA
PATRIOT ACT tittles should be integrated as part of the discussion.
2. Students will share, with the rest of the class, their final project presentation about
the “Crimes of the Millennium”.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes72
3. Students will take the final test. The test should be written in two languages,
Spanish and English, 50% & 50%
4. Students will submit, to the facilitator, the digital portfolio that follows the Digital
Performance Portfolio Assessment Manual.
Assessment:
1. Individual: Students will write their self-reflection based on the content of the
workshop. They must refer to the Digital Performance Portfolio Assessment
Handbook for a template to complete this activity. Students will take a final exam.
2. Group: Students will analyze the government security changes after 9/11 and the
effect of these changes in the operational function ofthe police at state and federal
level.
3. Written: Students will write an essay about the creation and development of the
Department of Homeland Security
4. Oral: Students will make a presentation on the crime assigned. Also, they will
orally discuss the relevant titles of the “USA PATRIOT Act”.
Lesson Wrap-Up: LAST TWO HOURS OF THE WORKSHOP
1. Individual: Students will participate in an activity known as Letters. Students will
assume the identity of a person who believes they have discovered a new crime
modality. The student will explain the crime and describe what resources
currently exist to fight that crime.
2. Group: Divided in groups of three (3), students will summarize the content of the
course and identify specific parts of the course’s content that have impacted them.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes73
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes74
APÉNDICES / APPENDIXES
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes75
AnejoA/Appendix A
NATIONAL PROFICIENCY LEVELS FOR DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION
Retrieved from: WIDA Consortium http://www.wida.us/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes76
“Can Do” Listening Rubric
National Proficiency Levels Criteria Starting
• Identifies objects • Names concrete objects • Points to picture/object of the word heard • Follows simple commands • Repeats words or simple phrases • Understands simple messages – gestures, pointing
Emerging
• Draws a picture • Requires continuous repetition • Follows verbal dictations • Checks-off words that were heard • Repeats information heard to determine comprehension • Understands slow speech and multiple repetitions
Developing • Understands more details of spoken language • Needs limited or no repetition and slow speech • Understands basic academic vocabulary which is frequently used in class discussion • Understands class discussions with some difficulty • Understands most of what was said
Expanding • Needs limited or no repetition at normal speed speech • Understands academic vocabulary used in class discussions • Understands class discussions with little difficulty • Understands nearly everything said
Bridging • Needs no repetition at normal speed speech • Understands elaborate academic vocabulary used in class discussions • Understands class discussions with no difficulty • Demonstrates a native-like English speaker’s understanding of what is said
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes77
“Can Do” Speaking Rubric
National Proficiency Levels
Criteria
Starting • Names concrete objects • Responds a simple yes or no to questions • Repeats words or simple phrases • Uses one word commands • Mispronounces words making it difficult to be understood • Breaks speech into parts making comprehension difficult • Uses limited or no vocabulary to support message
Emerging • Uses a few more words to respond to questions although grammatically incorrect • Uses one-, two-, and multiple-word commands • Uses verb tenses interchangeably • Misuses words in daily speech • Repeats spoken words or phrases to improve understanding due to pronunciation flaws • Uses grammar and word order incorrectly • Uses vocabulary (emerging stage) to support oral messages
Developing • Responds using longer phrases/sentences • Initiates and carries out conversations; however, there may be interruptions due to thinking of th
correct words to say • Applies grammar and word order correctly most of the time • Demonstrates correct use of basic academic vocabulary which is frequently used in class
discussions and/or oral assignments. • Speaks with some hesitation • Uses vocabulary to support oral messages • Speaks with less difficulty, but listener must pay close attention to pronunciation.
Expanding • Responds using elaborate phrases/sentences • Uses and interprets idiomatic expressions • Converses more fluently in social settings • Uses academic vocabulary frequently in class discussions • Participates in class discussions using academic content with slight hesitation • Misuse of grammar and word order seldom occurs and does not interrupt meaning • Pronounces most words accurately and clearly
Bridging • Speaks fluently • Uses elaborate academic vocabulary in all class discussions correctly • Participates in class discussion using academic content without hesitation • Uses appropriate vocabulary to support oral messages at all times • Uses correct grammar and word all the time • Speaks with native-like pronunciation and intonation
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes78
“Can Do” Reading Rubric
National Proficiency Levels
Criteria
Starting • Lacks comprehension of a wide array of written material (not developed) • Lacks ability to interpret graphs, charts, tables, and forms in textbooks (not developed) • Struggles with use of pre-reading and reading skills (not developed) • Lacks ability to apply reading strategies in order to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (not
developed) • Struggles with use of strategic reading skills (in order to plan his/her reading assignments, diagnose deficiencies,
resolve deficiencies independently or with the help of others, etc.) (not developed)
Emerging • Improving comprehension (slowly emerging) of a wide array of written material (e.g., fictional and non-fictional texts that bridge personal, professional and academic themes, news articles, short stories, short novels, etc.)
• Demonstrates correct interpretation of basic graphs, charts, tables and forms in textbooks • Applies limited pre-reading (e.g., activation of prior knowledge, semantic maps, etc.) and reading skills (e.g.,
skimming, scanning, inferences, paragraph frames, DRA, SQ4R, etc.) (slowly emerging) • Struggles with ability to use limited reading strategies to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (e.g.,
definition, restatement, examples, surrounding words, etc.) is • Strives to understand (even when not successful) the relationship between ideas (e.g., time, logical order,
comparison/contrast, cause/effect), and reading patterns in order to identify literary genres (as listed above) • Applying successful reading skills (as listed above) are still emerging
Developing • Comprehends a wide array of written material (as listed above) • Interprets basic graphs, charts, tables and forms • Applies correctly pre-reading and reading skills (as listed above) • Applies correct use of reading strategies to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (as listed above)-
evidence of emerging. • Understands the relationship between ideas (as listed above)-evidence of emerging.. • Uses strategic reading skills (as listed above) that are evident.
Expanding • Comprehends a wide array of level-appropriate written materials (as listed above) with mature accuracy • Interprets increasingly complex graphs, charts, tables, and forms accurately • Applies pre-reading and reading skills (as listed above) very strongly • Applies strategies to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (as listed
above) which is clearly evident • Identifies signal words to understand the relationship between ideas (as listed above), and reading patterns to
identify literary genres (as listed above)- emerging strongly • Understands the relationship between ideas (as listed above)-strongly evident. • Uses strategic reading skills (as listed above) with mature accuracy
Bridging • Comprehends various types and lengths of level appropriate written materials (as listed above)-fully developed • Interprets complex graphs, charts, tables, and forms accurately • Applies pre-reading and reading skills (as listed above)-fully developed • Applies reading strategies to determine the meaning of unfamiliar words in a text (as listed above) with accuracy • Understands the relationship between ideas (time, logical order, comparison/contrast, cause/effect) Demonstrates fully developed strategic reading skills (as listed above)
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes79
“Can Do”Writing Rubric
National Proficienc Levels
Criteria
Starting • Lacks clear writing and focus.. Details are limited or unclear. There’s no clear distinction to what is important and what is supported.
• Lacks engaging and drawing a conclusion. Paper simply starts and ends. Lack of transitions make it difficult to understand the paper.
• Writes with limited use of vocabulary or specific words to transmit meaning of the essay. Misuse of parts of speech makes it difficult to understand the writing.
• Rambles- use of incomplete sentences that are too long to understand. Sentences follow a simple structure and or style.
• Struggles with spelling, punctuation capitalization and other writing conventions. This makes it very difficult to understand the writing.
• Lacks strategic writing skills (e. g., knowledge of the writing process; declarative, procedural and conditional knowledge; and strategies for inquiry, drafting [such as investigating genre, considering audience, and responding to purpose], and for product revision) that are clearly not developed.
Emerging • Writes sentences that are still unclear there seems to be a guide to a focused topic; however, it may drift at times. There is an attempt in details to support main idea. Reader can still feel confused.
• Attempts to write an introduction and or conclusion. Use of transitions helps, but paper is in need of more details.
• Struggles with some vocabulary terms that are used inappropriately. Greater command of the parts of speech is developing,. but many words are still used incorrectly.
• Attempts to create a style of sentence structure here and there; although, for the most part it sticks to one style.
• Shows need of improving spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other writing conventions. It is still difficult to read the writing; but there are sig of improvement.
• Demonstrates emerging strategic writing skills.
Developing • Writes with an unclear focus. Writing appears to be on one topic, but shifts to another topic at times. Support of main idea is lacking. Reader is lef with unanswered questions.
• Attempts to write a proper introduction and conclusion however, both are dull or unclear. Transitions help connect ideas although at times they distract the flow.
• Selects and uses words appropriately; however, they are not higher level and need more vigor.
• Formulates well-written sentences; however, style and structure of sentences are repetitious.
• Demonstrates control of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other writing conventions. However, the writing could read and sound better by improving conventions.
• Utilizes strategic writing skills properly (now evident).
Expanding • Writes with a focus in mind; however, there is room for improvement. Needs more relevant details to support the main idea. Some readers’ questions can be answered, while others are left with doubt.
• Uses a proper introduction and conclusion, however, some improvement is needed. Needs to continue using transitional words are properly in order allow the proper flow of ideas.
• Selects and uses vocabulary words that are much more livelier and appropriate. Some common wording can be improved.
• Writes with a definite style, and sentence structure is “catchy” with few mistakes.
• Demonstrates good control of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other writing conventions. Mistakes are few and nothing distracts from the writing.
• Applies mature strategic writing skills.
Bridging • Writing is clear and focused on a narrowed topic. Details are relevant and accurate, and they support the main ideas. Reader’s questions are answe • Writing has a clear introduction that’s hooks the reader and conclusion that leaves a lasting impression. Use of transitions helps the reader to conne
ideas. Reading flows and not dull. • Words used in the writing are specific and accurate. Vivid verbs and modifying words are present. Words used enhance the meaning of the writing • There is a variety in length and structure of the sentences. The style of sentences varies on how they begin. Sentences create fluency and rhythm. • Excellent control of spelling, punctuation capitalization and other writing conventions. • Strategic writing skills are fully developed.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes80
Anejo B/Appendix B
THE WRITING PROCESS
6-TRAITS WRITING RUBRIC
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes81
Six-Traits of Writing Rubric
Student’s Name:________________________________________ Date:_____________ Facilitator:__________________________________ Course: ______________________ Assignment:_____________________________________________________________ Instructions: This rubric will be used to evaluate all written work done by the student in both Englishand Spanish. Please refer to the trait that you are evaluating (i.e., Ideas and Content) and write the score in the appropriate box. Select the criteria per level (6= highest, 1=lowest) that best reflects the student’s writing ability. Refer to all the Appendix (D) sheets that describe, in detail, all the writing traits that you are evaluating in order to complete this rubric properly.
Criteria per Level (From Highest to Lowest)
Writing Traits 6 5 4 3 2 1 1. Ideas and Content
2. Organization 3. Voice
4. Word Choice 5. Sentence Fluency
6. Conventions Totals (Add all the totals down, then
across to obtain the Grand Total.) Grand
Total: Final Score:_________________ Scoring Scale: (36-0) Outstanding: 33-36 points = A Very Good: 29-32 points = B Satisfactory: 24-28 points =C Fair: 19-23 points =D Poor: 0-18 points = F
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes82
Six Traits for Analytic Writing Rubrics
Trait #1: Idea and Content Criteria per Level Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from
https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
6
The writing is exceptionally clear, focused and interesting. It holds the reader’s attention throughout. Main ideas stand out and are developed by strong support and rich details suitable to audience and purpose. The writing is characterized by • clarity, focus, and control. • main idea(s) that stand out. • supporting, relevant, carefully selected details; when appropriate, use of resources provides strong, accurate, credible support • a thorough, balanced, in-depth explanation/ exploration of the topic; the writing makes connections and shares insights. • content and selected details that are well suited to audience and purpose.
5
The writing is clear, focused and interesting. It holds the reader’s attention. Main ideas stand out and are developed by supporting details suitable to audience and purpose. The writing is characterized by • clarity, focus, and control. • main idea(s) that stand out. • supporting, relevant, carefully selected details; when appropriate, use of resources provides strong, accurate, credible support. • a thorough, balanced explanation/exploration of the topic; the writing makes connections and shares insights. • content and selected details that are well-suited to audience and purpose.
4
The writing is clear and focused. The reader can easily understand the main ideas. Support is present, although it may be limited or rather general. The writing is characterized by • an easily identifiable purpose. • clear main idea(s) • supporting details that are relevant, but may be overly general or limited in places; when appropriate, resources are used to provide accurate support. • a topic that is explored/explained, although developmental details may occasionally be out of balance with the main idea(s); some connections and insights may be present. • content and selected details that are relevant, but perhaps not consistently well chosen for audience and purpose.
3
The reader can understand the main ideas, although they may be overly broad or simplistic, and the results may not be effective. Supporting detail is often limited, insubstantial, overly general, or occasionally slightly off-topic. The writing is characterized by • an easily identifiable purpose and main idea(s). • predictable or overly-obvious main ideas or plot; conclusions or main points seem to echo observations heard elsewhere. • support that is attempted; but developmental details that are often limited in scope, uneven, somewhat off-topic, predictable, or overly general. • details that may not be well-grounded in credible resources; they may be based on clichés, stereotypes or questionable sources of information. • difficulties when moving from general observations to specifics.
2
Main ideas and purpose are somewhat unclear or development is attempted but minimal. The writing is characterized by • a purpose and main idea(s) that may require extensive inferences by the reader. • minimal development; insufficient details. • irrelevant details that clutter the text. • extensive repetition of detail.
1 The writing lacks a central idea or purpose. The writing is characterized by • ideas that are extremely limited or simply unclear. • attempts at development that are minimal or non-existent; the paper is too short to demonstrate the development of an idea.
Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes83
Trait #2: Organization Criteria per Level
6
The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its development. The order and structure are compelling and move the reader through the text easily. The writing is characterized by • effective, perhaps creative, sequencing; the organizational structure fits the topic, and the writing is easy to follow. • a strong, inviting beginning that draws the reader in and a strong satisfying sense of resolution or closure. • smooth, effective transitions among all elements (sentences, paragraphs, and ideas). • details that fit where placed
5
The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its development. The order and structure are strong and move the reader through the text. The writing is characterized by. • effective sequencing; the organizational structure fits the topic, and the writing is easy to follow. • an inviting beginning that draws the reader in and a satisfying sense of resolution or closure. • smooth, effective transitions among all elements (sentences, paragraphs, and ideas). • details that fit where placed. .
4
Organization is clear and coherent. Order and structure are present, but may seem formulaic. The writing is characterized by • clear sequencing. • an organization that may be predictable. • a recognizable, developed beginning that may not be particularly inviting; a developed conclusion that may lack subtlety. • a body that is easy to follow with details that fit where placed. • transitions that may be stilted or formulaic. • organization which helps the reader, despite some weaknesses.
3
An attempt has been made to organize the writing; however, the overall structure is inconsistent or skeletal. The writing is characterized by • attempts at sequencing, but the order or the relationship among ideas may occasionally be unclear. • a beginning and an ending which, although present, are either undeveloped or too obvious (e.g. “My topic is...”, “These are all the reasons that…”) • transitions that sometimes work. The same few transitional devices (e.g., coordinating conjunctions, numbering, etc.) may be overused. • a structure that is skeletal or too rigid. • placement of details that may not always be effective. • organization which lapses in some places, but helps the reader in others.
2
The writing lacks a clear organizational structure. An occasional organizational device is discernible; however, the writing is either difficult to follow and the reader has to reread substantial portions, or the piece is simply too short to demonstrate organizational skills. The writing is characterized by • some attempts at sequencing, but the order or the relationship among ideas is frequently unclear. • a missing or extremely undeveloped beginning, body, and/or ending. • a lack of transitions, or when present, ineffective or overused. • a lack of an effective organizational structure. • details that seem to be randomly placed, leaving the reader frequently confused.
1
The writing lacks coherence; organization seems haphazard and disjointed. Even after rereading, the reader remains confused. The writing is characterized by • a lack of effective sequencing. • a failure to provide an identifiable beginning, body and/or ending. • a lack of transitions. • pacing that is consistently awkward; the reader feels either mired down in trivia or rushed along too rapidly. • a lack of organization which ultimately obscures or distorts the main point.
Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes84
Trait #3: Voice Criteria per Level
6
The writer has chosen a voice appropriate for the topic, purpose and audience. The writer seems deeply committed to the topic, and there is an exceptional sense of “writing to be read.” The writing is expressive, engaging, or sincere. The writing is characterized by • an effective level of closeness to or distance from the audience (e.g., a narrative should have a strong personal voice, while an expository piece may require extensive use of outside resources and a more academic voice; nevertheless, both should be engaging, lively, or interesting. Technical writing may require greater distance.). • an exceptionally strong sense of audience; the writer seems to be aware of the reader and of how to communicate the message most effectively. The reader may discern the writer behind the words and feel a sense of interaction. • a sense that the topic has come to life; when appropriate, the writing may show originality, liveliness, honesty, conviction, excitement, humor, or suspense.
5
The writer has chosen a voice appropriate for the topic, purpose, and audience. The writer seems committed to the topic, and there is a sense of “writing to be read.” The writing is expressive, engaging or sincere. The writing is characterized by • an appropriate level of closeness to or distance from the audience (e.g., a narrative should have a strong personal voice while an expository piece may require extensive use of outside resources and a more academic voice; nevertheless, both should be engaging, lively or interesting. Technical writing may require greater distance.). • a strong sense of audience; the writer seems to be aware of the reader and of how to communicate the message most effectively. The reader may discern the writer behind the words and feel a sense of interaction. • a sense that the topic has come to life; when appropriate, the writing may show originality, liveliness, honesty, conviction, excitement, humor, or suspense.
4
A voice is present. The writer demonstrates commitment to the topic, and there may be a sense of “writing to be read.” In places, the writing is expressive, engaging, or sincere. The writing is characterized by • a questionable or inconsistent level of closeness to or distance from the audience. • a sense of audience; the writer seems to be aware of the reader but has not consistently employed an appropriate voice. The reader may glimpse the writer behind the words and feel a sense of interaction in places. • liveliness, sincerity, or humor when appropriate; however, at times the writing may be either inappropriately casual or personal, or inappropriately formal and stiff.
3
The writer’s commitment to the topic seems inconsistent. A sense of the writer may emerge at times; however, the voice is either inappropriately personal or inappropriately impersonal. The writing is characterized by • a limited sense of audience; the writer’s awareness of the reader is unclear. • an occasional sense of the writer behind the words; however, the voice may shift or disappear a line or two later and the writing become somewhat mechanical. • a limited ability to shift to a more objective voice when necessary.
2
The writing provides little sense of involvement or commitment. There is no evidence that the writer has chosen a suitable voice. The writing is characterized by • little engagement of the writer; the writing tends to be largely flat, lifeless, stiff, or mechanical. • a voice that is likely to be overly informal and personal. • a lack of audience awareness; there is little sense of "writing to be read." • little or no hint of the writer behind the words. There is rarely a sense of interaction between reader and writer.
1 The writing seems to lack a sense of involvement or commitment. The writing is characterized by • no engagement of the writer; the writing is flat and lifeless. • a lack of audience awareness; there is no sense of “writing to be read.” • no hint of the writer behind the words. There is no sense of interaction between writer and reader; the writing does not involve or engage the reader.
Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes85
Trait #4: Word Choice Criteria per Level
6
Words convey the intended message in an exceptionally interesting, precise, and natural way appropriate to audience and purpose. The writer employs a rich, broad range of words, which have been carefully chosen and thoughtfully placed for impact. The writing is characterized by • accurate, strong, specific words; powerful words energize the writing. • fresh, original expression; slang, if used, seems purposeful and is effective. • vocabulary that is striking and varied, but that is natural and not overdone. • ordinary words used in an unusual way. • words that evoke strong images; figurative language may be used.
5
Words convey the intended message in an interesting, precise, and natural way appropriate to audience and purpose. The writer employs a broad range of words which have been carefully chosen and thoughtfully placed for impact. The writing is characterized by • accurate, specific words; word choices energize the writing. • fresh, vivid expression; slang, if used, seems purposeful and is effective. • vocabulary that may be striking and varied, but that is natural and not overdone. • ordinary words used in an unusual way. • words that evoke clear images; figurative language may be used
4
Words effectively convey the intended message. The writer employs a variety of words that are functional and appropriate to audience and purpose. The writing is characterized by • words that work but do not particularly energize the writing. • expression that is functional; however, slang, if used, does not seem purposeful and is not particularly effective. • attempts at colorful language that may occasionally seem overdone. • occasional overuse of technical language or jargon. • rare experiments with language; however, the writing may have some fine moments and generally avoids clichés.
3
Language is quite ordinary, lacking interest, precision and variety, or may be inappropriate to audience and purpose in places. The writer does not employ a variety of words, producing a sort of “generic” paper filled with familiar words and phrases. The writing is characterized by • words that work, but that rarely capture the reader’s interest. • expression that seems mundane and general; slang, if used, does not seem purposeful and is not effective. • attempts at colorful language that seem overdone or forced. • words that are accurate for the most part, although misused words may occasionally appear, technical language or jargon may be overused or inappropriately used. • reliance on clichés and overused expressions.
2
Language is monotonous and/or misused, detracting from the meaning and impact. The writing is characterized by • words that are colorless, flat or imprecise. • monotonous repetition or overwhelming reliance on worn expressions that repeatedly distract from the message. • images that are fuzzy or absent altogether.
1
The writing shows an extremely limited vocabulary or is so filled with misuses of words that the meaning is obscured. Only the most general kind of message is communicated because of vague or imprecise language. The writing is characterized by • general, vague words that fail to communicate. • an extremely limited range of words. • words that simply do not fit the text; they seem imprecise, inadequate, or just plain wrong.
Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes86
Trait #5: Sentence Fluency Criteria per Level
6
The writing has an effective flow and rhythm. Sentences show a high degree of craftsmanship, with consistently strong and varied structure that makes expressive oral reading easy and enjoyable. The writing is characterized by • a natural, fluent sound; it glides along with one sentence flowing effortlessly into the next. • extensive variation in sentence structure, length, and beginnings that add interest to the text. • sentence structure that enhances meaning by drawing attention to key ideas or reinforcing relationships among ideas. • varied sentence patterns that create an effective combination of power and grace. • strong control over sentence structure; fragments, if used at all, work well. • stylistic control; dialogue, if used, sounds natural.
5
The writing has an easy flow and rhythm. Sentences are carefully crafted, with strong and varied structure that makes expressive oral reading easy and enjoyable. The writing is characterized by • a natural, fluent sound; it glides along with one sentence flowing into the next. • variation in sentence structure, length, and beginnings that add interest to the text. • sentence structure that enhances meaning. • control over sentence structure; fragments, if used at all, work well. • stylistic control; dialogue, if used sounds natural.
4
The writing flows; however, connections between phrases or sentences may be less than fluid. Sentence patterns are somewhat varied, contributing to ease in oral reading. The writing is characterized by • a natural sound; the reader can move easily through the piece, although it may lack a certain rhythm and grace. • some repeated patterns of sentence structure, length, and beginnings that may detract somewhat from overall impact. • strong control over simple sentence structures, but variable control over more complex sentences; fragments, if present, are usually effective. • occasional lapses in stylistic control; dialogue, if used, sounds natural for the most part, but may at times sound stilted or unnatural.
3
The writing tends to be mechanical rather than fluid. Occasional awkward constructions may force the reader to slow down or reread. The writing is characterized by • some passages that invite fluid oral reading; however, others do not. • some variety in sentences structure, length, and beginnings, although the writer falls into repetitive sentence patterns. • good control over simple sentence structures, but little control over more complex sentences; fragments, if present, may not be effective. • sentences which, although functional, lack energy. • lapses in stylistic control; dialogue, if used, may sound stilted or unnatural.
2
The writing tends to be either choppy or rambling. Awkward constructions often force the reader to slow down or reread. The writing is characterized by • significant portions of the text that are difficult to follow or read aloud. • sentence patterns that are monotonous (e.g., subject-verb or subject-verb-object). • a significant number of awkward, choppy, or rambling constructions.
1
The writing is difficult to follow or to read aloud. Sentences tend to be incomplete, rambling, or very awkward. The writing is characterized by • text that does not invite—and may not even permit—smooth oral reading. • confusing word order that is often jarring and irregular. • sentence structure that frequently obscures meaning. • sentences that are disjointed, confusing, or rambling. Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes87
Trait #6: Conventions Criteria per Level
6
The writing demonstrates exceptionally strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Errors are so few and so minor that the reader can easily skim right over them unless specifically searching for them. The writing is characterized by • strong control of conventions; manipulation of conventions may occur for stylistic effect. • strong, effective use of punctuation that guides the reader through the text. • correct spelling, even of more difficult words. • paragraph breaks that reinforce the organizational structure. • correct grammar and usage that contribute to clarity and style. • skill in using a wide range of conventions in a sufficiently long and complex piece. • little or no need for editing.
5
The writing demonstrates strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Errors are so few and so minor that they do not impede readability. The writing is characterized by • strong control of conventions. • effective use of punctuation that guides the reader through the text. • correct spelling, even of more difficult words. • paragraph breaks that reinforce the organizational structure. • correct capitalization; errors, if any, are minor. • correct grammar and usage that contribute to clarity and style. • skill in using a wide range of conventions in a sufficiently long and complex piece. • little need for editing.
4
The writing demonstrates control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage). Minor errors, while perhaps noticeable, do not impede readability. The writing is characterized by • control over conventions used, although a wide range is not demonstrated. • correct end-of-sentence punctuation, internal punctuation may sometimes be incorrect. • spelling that is usually correct, especially on common words. • basically sound paragraph breaks that reinforce the organizational structure. • correct capitalization; errors, if any, are minor. • occasional lapses in correct grammar and usage; problems are not severe enough to distort meaning or confuse the reader. • moderate need for editing.
3
The writing demonstrates limited control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage). Errors begin to impede readability. The writing is characterized by • some control over basic conventions; the text may be too simple to reveal mastery. • end-of-sentence punctuation that is usually correct; however, internal punctuation contains frequent errors. • spelling errors that distract the reader; misspelling of common words occurs. • paragraphs that sometimes run together or begin at ineffective places. • capitalization errors. • errors in grammar and usage that do not block meaning but do distract the reader. • significant need for editing.
2
The writing demonstrates little control of standard writing conventions. Frequent, significant errors impede readability. The writing is characterized by • little control over basic conventions. • many end-of-sentence punctuation errors; internal punctuation contains frequent errors. • spelling errors that frequently distract the reader; misspelling of common words often occurs. • paragraphs that often run together or begin in ineffective places. • capitalization that is inconsistent or often incorrect. • errors in grammar and usage that interfere with readability and meaning. • substantial need for editing.
1
Numerous errors in usage, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. In fact, the severity and frequency of errors are so overwhelming that the reader finds it difficult to focus on the message and must reread for meaning. The writing is characterized by • very limited skill in using conventions. • basic punctuation (including end-of-sentence punctuation) that tends to be omitted, haphazard, or incorrect. • frequent spelling errors that significantly impair readability. • paragraph breaks that may be highly irregular or so frequent (every sentence) that they bear no relation to the organization of the text. • capitalization that appears to be random. • a need for extensive editing.
Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes88
APÉNDICE C / APPENDIX C:
ORAL PRESENTATION RUBRIC
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes89
/
AnejoC/Appendix C
Oral Presentation Rubric
Student: ______________________________________________________________
Topic: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________
Criteria Value Points Student’s Score
Presentation
Student holds attention of entire
audience with the use of direct eye
contact, seldom looking at notes.
10 point
Demonstration meets stated purpose
very clearly, showing control and
organization.
10 point
All aspects are outstanding and creative,
making the product a definite
contribution to the targeted area.
10 point
For scope of subject, very original, in
addition to appropriate, using a variety
of authentic-only resources.
10 point
Excellent knowledge of procedure;
effective delivery; time limit observed.
10 point
Interaction between students-students,
students-teacher, teacher-students is
fluent and effective at all times of the
demonstration.
10 point
Outstanding use of technology and/or
visual aids helped students grasp full
understanding of the content delivered
10 point
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes90
through the technique.
Language
Demonstrates a command of standard
English (vocabulary, syntax and flow of
ideas)
10 point
Uses correct pronunciation of the language. 10 point
Student uses a clear voice with a good
projection and intonation.
10 point
Total Points 100 ( 70% content and 30%
language)
_________ Total score
Facilitator Signature: _________________________________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes91
Anejo C/Appendix C
Matriz de Valoración de Presentación Oral
Nombre:__________________________________ Fecha:_________________
CRITERIOS VALOR PUNTOS OBTENIDOS
Presentación
Mantiene la atención de toda la audiencia utilizando el contacto visual directo y mirando las notas de ser necesario ocasionalmente.
10 puntos
Los movimientos son adecuados y ayudan a la audiencia a visualizar el contenido de la presentación.
10 puntos
El estudiante expone el perfil diagnóstico de una manera detallada y completa.
10 puntos
El estudiante hace un análisis completo de sus observaciones, de la ejecución y de los resultados finales del avalúo administrado.
10 puntos
El estudiante demuestra un conocimiento completo al responder todas las preguntas con explicaciones y elaboraciones.
10 puntos
El estudiante presenta la información en una
10 puntos
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes92
secuencia lógica e interesante la cual la audiencia puede seguir sin problema. Utiliza la tecnología adecuadamente.
10 puntos
Lenguage Demuestra habilidad en el manejo del idioma inglés estándar (vocabulario, sintaxis y flujo de ideas)
10 puntos
El estudiante utiliza una voz clara con buena proyección y entonación.
10 puntos
Usa una pronunciación correcta durante la presentación
10 puntos
Total de Puntos: 100 puntos ( 70% contenido y 30% language)
Puntaje Total: __________
Firma del Facilitador:____________________________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes93
APÉNDICE D / APPENDIX D: GUIDELINES TO PREPARE THE PORTFOLIO
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes94
Apéndice D / Appendix D
GUIDELINES TO PREPARE THE PORTFOLIO
Refer to Performance Portfolio Assessment Handbook
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes95
APÉNDICE E/ APPENDIX E: SELF-REFLECTION
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes96
APPENDIX E
SELF-REFLECTION
Directions: Please complete the following blanks:
This entry is an example of my strengths:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This entry is an example of an area I really need to improve:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This entry is an example of an area I have improved: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I think this exercise has been very helpful for my learning because:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes97
ANEJO E
AUTORREFLEXIÓN
Instrucciones: Complete los siguientes espacios en blanco:
Este ingreso es un ejemplo de mis fortalezas:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Este ingreso es un ejemplo de un área que realmente necesito mejorar:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Este ingreso es un ejemplo de un área que he mejorado:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Considero que este ejercicio ha sido muy útil para mi aprendizaje porque:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes98
APÉNDICE F / APPENDIX F:
ANALITICAL ESSAY RUBRIC
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes99
APPENDIX F
ESSAY RUBRIC
STUDENT:_________________________________ DATE:_______________________
CRITERIA VALUE POINTS STUDENT SCORE
Content
Thesis is clear & well stated.
10 points
Major or relevant details are exposed in essay.
10 points
Accurately explains and develops thesis and its implications based on research studies that support the author’s ideas about the topic providing exact data and precise examples.
10 points
Analysis of the topic is comprehensive and clear.
10 points
Draw conclusions based on research facts only.
10 points
Establish a writer relationship with the subject, providing a clear perspective on the presented subject matter and engaging the audience attention.
10 points
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes100
Note: The score obtained by the student should be recorded as follows:
Grading Scale:
The following grading scale will be applied in this course:
100 – 90% A
89 – 80% B
79 – 70% C
69 – 60% D
59 – 0% F
Demonstrate a comprehensive grasp of significant ideas to reach a higher level of understanding in an organizational manner.
10 points
Language
Demostrate a command of standard English (vocabulary, syntax and flow of ideas)
10 points
Uses grammar and style appropriately and correctly
10 points
Uses spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and APA format correctly throughout the document (cover page, essay body, and list of references)
10 points
Total Points
___________________
100 points (70% content and 30% language)
Total Score:
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes101
APÉNDICE F / APPENDIXF :
MATRIZ DE VALORACIÓN DEL ENSAYO
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes102
MATRIZ DE VALORACION DEL ENSAYO
NOMBRE DEL ESTUDIANTE:____________________________________________
TEMA:________________________________ FECHA:_____________________
CRITERIOS VALOR PUNTAJE OBTENIDO
La introducción es clara y bien establecida.
Se exponen los detalles más importantes o relevantes del tema.
Comunica las ideas basadas solamente en los resultados de las investigaciones educativas a través de múltiples citas y referencias bibliográficas.
El análisis del tema es profundo y claro.
La información presentada en el ensayo corresponde a las investigaciones educativas más recientes y debidamente validadas.
Establece una relación del autor (es) con el tema, brindando una perspectiva clara sobre el tema presentado y atrayendo la atención de la audiencia o lector
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes103
Elabora conclusiones basadas en los resultados de la investigaciones educativas solamente, las cuales cita en todo el documento adecuadamente.
Lenguaje
Demuestra un uso profesional del idioma Español (vocabulario, sintaxis y flujo de ideas)
Incluye un excelente manejo de diversos tipos de oraciones a través del ensayo.
Utiliza la ortografía, la puntuación y el formato APA correctamente en todo el documento
Puntaje total: 100 pts. (70% contenido y 30 % lenguaje)
Puntaje Total:
Escala Evaluativa:
Se aplicará la curva estándar para evaluar en este curso:
100 – 90% A
89 – 80% B
79 – 70% C
69 – 60% D
59 – 0% F
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes104
APÉNDICE G / APPENDIX G :
Study Cases and Exercises
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes105
CASES FOR WORKSHOP THREE (3) PRESENTATIONS:
The case summary must include:
� a. The parties of the case � b. Facts of the case (Students shall use their own words) � c. Controversy or Question to the court � d. Decision and the arguments use by the court to support the decision. � Immediate impact on police operation or case significance to the police operational
function. ***The facilitator may add or eliminate cases as needed depending on the size of the class.
CASE: CASE CITATION: NAME OF THE STUDENT:
Gideon vs. Wainwright 372 US 335 (1963)
Mapp vs. Ohio 367 US 643 (1961)
Miranda vs. Arizona 384 US 436
Terry vs. Ohio 392 US 1 (1968)
Arizona vs. Hicks 480 US 321 (1987)
Brewer vs. Williams 430 US 387 (1977)
U.S. vs. Ross 456 US 798 (1982)
Rochin vs. California 342 U.S. 165 (1952)
Tennessee vs. Garner 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
Chimel vs. California 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
Carroll vs. U.S. 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes106
APÉNDICE H / APPENDIX H:
ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION EVALUATION
EVALUACIÓN DE LA PARTICIPACIÓN EN CADA TALLER
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes107
APPENDIX H
ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION EVALUATION
Criteria Workshop
1
Workshop
2
Workshop
3
Workshop
4
Workshop
5
Daily Attendance
(15 points each)
Shows mastery of the topics
discussed in class
(5 points)
Completed assigned work
(5 points )
Turn work in on time
(5 points)
30 points /Workshop
Total Points:______________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes108
APENDICE H/APPENDIX H
EVALUACION DE ASISTENCIA Y PARTICIPACION EN CADA TALLER
Asistencia a clases
(15 puntos c/u)
Taller 1 Taller 2
Taller 3 Taller 4 Taller 5
Demostración del dominio de los
temas discutidos en clase
(5 puntos)
Cumplimiento con las tareas asignadas
(5 puntos)
Puntualidad en la entrega de trabajos
(5 puntos)
Total de puntos por taller
Total de puntos: ________________
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes109
APÉNDICE I / APPENDIX I:
FINAL PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
“CRIMES OF THE NEW MILLENIUM”
INSTRUCCIONES PARA EL PROYECTO FINAL
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes110
APPENDIX I/ANEJO I
FINAL PROJECT-CRIMES OF THE NEW MILLENIUM
WORKSHOP FIVE
CRIMES STUDENTS/GROUPS
Identity Theft
Computer Intrusion/Computer Hacking
Internet Fraud and Spam
Child Pornography or Exploitation
Terrorism
Trafficking in explosive, incendiary devices, or firearms over the Internet
Internet Harassment(Cyber stalking)
Advanced Technologies in Counterfeiting of Currency
Copyright piracy (e.g., software, movie, sound recordings)
Trademark counterfeiting
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes111
Instructions:
Each student will prepare an essay with a minimum of four (4) pages related to the
assigned New Millennia Crime. Both exercises can be individual and/or in a group
depending upon the size of the class and the facilitator’s discretion.
The report must include the following topics:
� Brief description of the crime together with its elements. The elements of a crime are
a series of components which must be present in order for it to be demonstrated that
someone is guilty of a crime.
� The development and different modalities, if more than one, of that specific crime.
� The government agencies and departments that have the duty with the control and
monitoring of that crime (state agencies [Florida only] and federal agencies).
� Research and evaluation of new case law and its influence at an operational level in
the control and monitoring of the assigned crime.
� All other efforts and adjustments at all levels (state and federal) made by law
enforcement to effectively investigate and control the occurrence of the assigned
crime.
� Evaluation of the laws and available recourses of law enforcement to effectively
manage and control the occurrence of the assigned crime?
� What would you do differently to create a better enforcement and control of that
specific crime?
o Include examples of financial, operational and infrastructure resources that
will be needed to be put in place in order to control that crime occurrence.
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes112
Also, include any other resources that, from your point of view, should be
included.
� What are the economic and political consequences of this crime at a national and
local level?
In preparation for this topic, a minimum of three (3) reliable sources of information
must be used. Remember that your work must be original and appropriate credit should
be given to the original source. The report will be evaluated using Appendixes A, B and
F.
The final project will include an oral presentation developed in PowerPoint. The
facilitator will indicate the length of the presentations according to the size of the class.
The oral presentation will be evaluated using Appendix C. The written part of the final
Project will be written in Spanish and the oral presentation will be in English, to comply
with the bilingual format of Workshop 5.
The written portion of the project shall follow the following format:
I. Introduction
a. Development of the assigned crime.
II. Analysis
a. Based in the guiding questions explained above.
III. Conclusion
IV. References and Resources (Three[3] Minimum)
The oral presentation must include everything covered in the written portion of the
project. *Due to the bilingual nature of the Fifth Workshop (5) the group will complete
Updated 01/14/2013
CRJU 540 Law Enforcement and Judicial Changes113
the written part of the project in Spanish and the oral presentation in English. The project
will be evaluated using Appendixes A, B, C, F and I.
Updated 01/14/2013