singapore property weekly issue 217
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
1/15
Issue 217Copyright © 2011-2014 www.Propwise.sg. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.propwise.sg/http://www.propwise.sg/
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
2/15
ContributeDo you have articles and insights and articles that you’d like to share
with thousands of readers interested in the Singapore property
market? Send them to us at [email protected], and if they’re good
enough, we’ll publish them here, on our blog and even on Yahoo!
News.
AdvertiseWant to get your brand, product, service or property listing out to
thousands of Singapore property investors at a very reasonable
cost? Head over to www.propwise.sg/advertise/ to find out more.
CONTENTS
p2 7 Reasons Why Property Prices Won’t
p8 Singapore Property News This Week
p13 Resale Property Transactions
(July 1 – July 7 )
Welcome to the 217th edition of the
Singapore Property Weekly .
Hope you like it!
Mr. Propwise
FROM THE
EDITOR
mailto:[email protected]://www.propwise.sg/advertise/http://www.propwise.sg/advertise/mailto:[email protected]
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
3/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 2Back to Contents
Recover Soon
By Property Soul (guest contributor)
There was a recent article in the Straits Times
with the headline “Time to review property
cooling measures”. The argument is that as: i.
Private home prices are down ii. HDB flat
prices have dropped iii. Oversupply has
worsened iv. Rents have weakened v. Interest
rates have risen vi. The real estate industry
has shed jobs, it may be time for the
government to review the cooling measures.Many people fail to see that the government
can only do so much to cool or stimulate the
property market.
7 Reasons Why Property Prices Won’t
http://propertysoul.com/author/propertysoul/http://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/time-to-review-property-cooling-measureshttp://propertysoul.com/author/propertysoul/http://propertysoul.com/author/propertysoul/http://propertysoul.com/author/propertysoul/
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
4/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 3Back to Contents
After all, it is an open market and there are
many factors that can lead to the continual
boom or downturn of the market, such as
supply and demand, the economic outlook,
market confidence, etc.
I am re-reading James Rickards’s book The
Death of Money: The Coming Collapse of the
International Monetary System. Below are
some new inspirations from this interesting
read.1. Regime Uncertainty
When the Singapore government finally
decides to withdraw the cooling measures, it
may do little to help restore fallen prices.
Remember those government measurestaken to stimulate the property market back in
year 2005? The loan-to-value limit was raised
to 90%. But not many buyers were interested.
The “regime uncertainty” theory from Charles
Kindleberger explains the reason behind the
lack of investment during the Great
Depression:
“… even when market prices have declined
sufficiently to attract investors back into the
economy, investors may still refrain because
unsteady public policy makes it impossible to
calculate returns with any degree of accuracy
… the added uncertainty caused by activistgovernment policy ostensibly designed to
improve conditions that typically makes
matters worse.”
From mid-June, stocks in China tumbled 30
percent from their seven-year high. Then the
Chinese government and Chinese
brokerages suddenly announced drastic
measures to revive the stock market. The
intervention might have saved the market
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_P._Kindlebergerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_P._Kindlebergerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_P._Kindlebergerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_P._Kindlebergerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_P._Kindleberger
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
5/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 4Back to Contents
from the brink of collapse and demonstrated
how powerful and cash-rich the government
is (and compared with China’s $3 trillion
reserves the money spent is just peanuts).
However, the whole incident exposes the
vulnerability of the fundamentals and further
undermines the market confidence of the
investors.
After all, who needs government to step in if a
market is healthy enough to recover on itsown?
2. Market Oversupply
With 24,800 vacant private homes, an
additional 22,000 to be completed this year,
and another 21,000 to be ready next year,
hat kind of population growth do we need in
Singapore to absorb the surplus?
Like what Rickards says: “In the end, if you
build it, they may not come, and a hard
landing will follow.”
3. Wealth Effect
Rickards points out the fact that two assetclasses – stocks and housing – represent the
wealth of most people (which is certainly the
case in Singapore). When prices of stocks
and properties go up, people “feel richer and
more prosperous and are willing to save less
and spend more.”
It is a chicken-and-egg situation: Low
borrowing rates and easy money make
properties look affordable, attracting
Singaporeans to put more money in
properties, thus driving property prices to new
highs.
The same happens in reverse on the way
down.
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
6/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 5Back to Contents
4. Wealth Inequality
The wealth effect only benefits the “haves”,
not the “don’t haves”.
Wealth becomes heavily concentrated in theprivileged class who own properties, or
businesses who own a stake in the industry
(property developers, real estate agencies,
banks, brokers, etc.).
When prices are rising faster than wages,
housing becomes unaffordable for the
common people who are the end consumers
of all the housing products. The average
people do not get anything from inflated
housing prices, except the adverse effect o
inflation.
5. Asset Bubble
Cheap money widens the disparity between
the rising costs of housing and the
unchanged affordability of home buyers, all
disguised under the continual growth of debt.
But many people fail to see that this wealth
effect is superficial in the sense that it doesn’tcome from real economic growth of the
country. In other words, the booming property
market is not created out of an increase in
productivity, trade surplus or foreign direct
investment.
When the real estate market softens, the networth of people who are asset rich in
properties diminishes with the deflated asset
bubble.
6. Asymmetric Information
Many buyers are looking for great bargains inthis market. They assume that sellers would
hang on to their properties if they are not so
desperate to sell. This belief causes buyers to
lower the prices they are willing to pay.
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
7/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 6Back to Contents
However, not all sellers letting go of their
properties now are desperate sellers. They
refuse to sell at unreasonably-low prices and
ithdraw their properties from the market.
The see-saw situation results in fewer
properties for sale and lower transaction
volumes every quarter.
7. Self-fulfilling Expectations
Buyers are sitting on the fence and holding
back home purchases. Investors are losing
appetite for property investment and looking
for a safe haven to park their wealth. The
drop in transaction volumes and prices
eventually becomes a self-fulfilling
expectation.
A persistent depressed market, coupled with
adverse factors like supply glut, interest rate
hike, soft rental market, etc., requires strong
holding power to tide through the storm. And
holding power means having healthy level of
cash reserves and high liquidity of other
assets.
Unfortunately, the near-zero-interest rate
discourages savings which has depleted bank
savings and fixed deposits in the past fewyears. The market can be more vulnerable
than what it appears to be. The loss of market
confidence can trigger a ripple effect which
causes frenzied dumping to cover losses.
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY I 217
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
8/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 7Back to Contents
It doesn't matter what the industry
stakeholders are saying. It is still early to say
that the Singapore property market is
recovering. To be prudent investors, take the
hint from James Rickards:
“The key to wealth preservation is to
understand the complex processes and to
seek shelter from the cascade.”
By guest contributor Property Soul, a
successful property investor, blogger , and author of the No B.S. Guide to Property
Investment.
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY I 217
http://propertysoul.com/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://propertymarketinsights.com/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://aktive.com.sg/store/no-b-s-guide-to-property-investment/http://propertysoul.com/
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
9/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Singapore Property This Week
Page | 8Back to Contents
Residential
D ev e lo p e r s s o l d 4 2% f e w e r p r i v a te h o m e s
i n J u n e
In June, developers sold 372 private homes.
This was 42% lower than the 643 private
homes sold in May. Not only so, developers
have been cutting back on the supply of new
homes. According to data from URA, no new
projects were launched in June. On the other
hand, buyers have also been negatively
impacted by cooling measures such as the
total debt servicing ratio that restricts buyers’
ability to finance their properties. This has led
market experts to believe that the
government will not be lifting the cooling
measures any time soon. Desmond Sim from
CBRE Research believes that developers
would sell about 6,000 to 7,000 private
homes this year. However, Chia Siew Chuin
from Colliers International believes that
buyers will return to the market if project units
are reasonably priced.
(Source: Business Times)
SRX: c o n do r en ts d o w n b y 0.5% w h i le
HDB rents up by 0.1%
According to the Business Times, the
residential leasing market remains weak in
June due to a limited pool of tenants.
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Iss e 217
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
10/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 9Back to Contents
In June, rents of private condos and
apartments slipped by 0.5% month-on-month.
Particularly, rents in the city suffered the
largest drop as rents fell by 0.8%. Rents in
the suburban region also fell by 0.7%.However, rents in the city-fringes remained
the same. On the other hand, rental volumes
rose by 1% to 3,777 units in June, up from
the 3,739 units rented in May. Eugene Lim
from ERA Realty said that the increase in
rental volumes was not due to demand.Instead, he believes tenants are moving
because they have found another place with
a lower rent or is of better quality. In the HDB
rental market, rents have increased by 0.1%
month-on-month in June. Five-room HDB
flats saw the highest increase in rents by
1.2%. Three-room flats also experienced a
0.3% increase in rents. However, four-room
and executive flats recorded a 0.5% fall in
rents. Lim believes that the weak private
residential market will continue to impact the
HDB rental market such that rents will remain
low.
(Source: Business Times)
P r iv at e r es i d en t i al r es al e p r ic es d r o p b y
1.6% year-on-year
Data from SRX showed that year-on-year,
non-landed private residential resale prices
have fallen by 1.6% year-on-year, this June.
Particularly, in the core central region, and
outside central region, private residential
resale prices have fallen by 7.1% and 2.3%
respectively. However, resale prices in the
city fringes have climbed by 6%.
Nonetheless, the overall resale price index for
non-landed private homes has increased by
0.4% month-on-month in June from May.
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
11/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 10Back to Contents
Also, the overall median transaction over X-
value (TOX) remained zero in June. Eugene
Lim from ERA Realty believes that this may
indicate that prices in the resale market have
stabilised as this is the third consecutivemonth that the TOX was at zero.
(Source: Business Times)
Q2 GCB sales increases to $282m
In Q2 this year, a total of 11 good class
bungalows (GCBs) changed hands. This
totals up to $282.3 million, up from the 4
deals that were completed in the first quarter.
Not only so, in June, a record price per
square foot was achieved for a furnished
bungalow in Bishopsgate at $2,190 psf. The
bungalow which had two storeys and a
basement was sold for a total of $33 million.
According to Newsman Realty, buyers’
interest in GCBs has increased over the last
three months. Newsman Realty believes that
the value of GCB transactions this year may
even exceed $700 million as sellers are more
realistic about pricing expectations.
(Source: Business Times)
M ND : H DB i s r es p o n s ib l e f o r r ec ti fy i n g
defects i n BTO and n ot DBSS f l ats
According to the Ministry of National
Development, HDB is responsible for
rectifying defects in BTO flats, while private
developers are responsible for the flaws in
DBSS projects. However, HDB may be roped
in to help DBSS developers resolve matters.
Desmond Lee Minister of State for National
Development said that HDB provides broad
planning parameters and sets the buyers’
eligibility requirements. As such, private
developers of DBSS projects are responsible
for the design, pricing and construction quality
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
12/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 11Back to Contents
of the flat. Lee added that the structural
integrity and safety of buildings are a priority
and should not be compromised.
(Source: Business Times)
Commercial
I n c r e a s i n g i n t e r e s t r a t e s m a y n o t b e b a d
for o f f i ce capi tal val ues
While interest rates have increased over the
last year, it may not necessarily have anegative impact on office capital values. An
analysis in the Business Times which mapped
the movement of office property price index
(PPI) in relation to the three-month Singapore
interbank offer rate (Sibor) from Q3 1987 to
Q1 2015, showed that of all the quartershere the three-month Sibor rose, the office
PPI increased in 60% of them. This could be
because interest rates usually rise in tandem
ith economic growth. As the economy
grows, investors’ confidence in real estate
investments may also increase. This will prop
up demand for real estate. Not only so,
property prices may increase further when the
current inventory does not satisfy theincrease in demand. As such, a higher
interest rate may not always be bad news for
the office market.
(Source: Business Times)
P r o p e r t y m a r k e t u n l i k e l y t o r e b o u n d e v e n i f coo l i ng m easures are rel axed
According to a property seminar by the Real
Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore
(Reads), the property market is unlikely to
rebound even if some cooling measures were
to be relaxed. Chua Hak Bin from the Bank of
America Merrill Lynch believes that the
property market will stagnate in the next few
years.
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
13/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 12Back to Contents
It is believed that the oversupply of private
housing, the low demand and the rising
vacancy rate will further weaken the property
market. Not only so, manufacturing activities
have remained subdued and the supply of
multiple-user factory space has exceeded
demand. This has pushed rental prices down,
said Lee Nai Jia from DTZ. Christine Li from
Cushman & Wakefield added that office
leases as a proportion of total leases by floor
area has fallen to only 4% in H1 this year,
down from 15% in 2014. Alice Tan from
Knight Frank also cautioned that the retail
market outlook may not be optimistic if
existing market conditions persist.
(Source: Business Times)
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
http://www.moneymatters.sg/
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
14/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 13Back to Contents
Non-Landed Residential Resale Property Transactions for the Week of Jul 1 – Jul 7
Postal
DistrictProject Name
Area
(sqft)
Transacted
Price ($)
Price
($ psf)Tenure
1 MARINA BAY RESIDENCES 732 1,600,000 2,186 993 DOMAIN 21 883 1,300,000 1,473 99
3 QUEENS 1,195 1,500,000 1,255 99
3 QUEENS 1,184 1,430,000 1,208 99
3 QUEENS 1,184 1,420,000 1,199 99
4 REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY 1,550 2,550,000 1,645 99
4 CARIBBEAN AT KEPPEL BAY 1,281 1,950,000 1,522 99
4 CARIBBEAN AT KEPPEL BAY 1,227 1,860,000 1,516 99
4 THE INTERLACE 1,464 1,700,000 1,161 99
4 TERESA VILLE 1,959 2,000,000 1,021 FH5 PASIR PANJANG LODGE 1,249 1,100,000 881 FH
8 KERRISDALE 1,259 1,290,000 1,024 99
9 URBAN SUITES 1,572 4,150,000 2,641 FH
9 THE COSMOPOLITAN 1,399 2,965,000 2,119 FH
9 RIVERGATE 1,894 3,700,000 1,953 FH
9 ORCHARD TOWERS 1,970 2,538,000 1,288 FH
11 THE LINC 1,851 2,900,000 1,566 FH
11 NEWTON LODGE 1,216 1,650,000 1,357 FH
12 THE INTERWEAVE 344 635,000 1,844 FH14 THE SUNNY SPRING 1,023 1,022,000 999 FH
15 THE VIEW @ MEYER 1,851 3,000,000 1,620 FH
15 THE SEA VIEW 1,647 2,620,168 1,591 FH
15 THE SEAFRONT ON MEYER 1,604 2,480,000 1,546 FH
Postal
DistrictProject Name
Area
(sqft)
Transacted
Price ($)
Price
($ psf)Tenure
15 THE SEA VIEW 1,647 2,450,000 1,488 FH15 CAMELOT BY-THE-WATER 2,637 3,800,000 1,441 99
15 EVERITT EDGE 484 690,000 1,425 FH
15 THE MAKENA 1,152 1,470,000 1,276 FH
15 CRYSTAL RHU 1,281 1,580,000 1,233 FH
15 LAGUNA PARK 1,615 1,420,000 879 99
15 NEPTUNE COURT 1,270 1,080,000 850 99
16 COSTA DEL SOL 1,227 1,630,000 1,328 99
16 BREEZE BY THE EAST 2,045 2,050,000 1,002 FH
16 SUNHAVEN 2,034 1,580,000 777 FH17 HEDGES PARK CONDOMINIUM 1,001 960,000 959 99
18 OASIS @ ELIAS 1,389 1,100,000 792 99
19 PRIMO RESIDENCES 603 828,000 1,374 FH
19 OASIS GARDEN 1,227 1,438,000 1,172 FH
19 THE MINTON 1,109 1,220,000 1,100 99
19 KENSINGTON PARK CONDOMINIUM 1,668 1,700,000 1,019 999
19 CHUAN PARK 1,528 1,350,000 883 99
20 THOMSON IMPERIAL COURT 2,142 1,650,000 770 FH
21 SIGNATURE PARK 1,033 1,130,000 1,094 FH21 SPRINGDALE CONDOMINIUM 1,152 1,188,888 1,032 999
21 SOUTHAVEN I 1,442 1,190,000 825 99
22 THE LAKEFRONT RESIDENCES 764 1,030,000 1,348 99
22 THE CENTRIS 1,292 1,250,000 968 99
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
-
8/20/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 217
15/15
SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 217
Page | 14Back to Contents
NOTE: This data only covers non-landed residential resale propertytransactions with caveats lodged with the Singapore Land Authority.Typically, caveats are lodged at least 2-3 weeks after a purchasersigns an OTP, hence the lagged nature of the data.
Postal
DistrictProject Name
Area
(sqft)
Transacted
Price ($)
Price
($ psf)Tenure
22 THE MAYFAIR 893 850,000 951 99
22 THE LAKEFRONT RESIDENCES 2,422 2,204,020 910 99
22 PARC VISTA 1,259 1,095,000 869 99
22 LAKEPOINT CONDOMINIUM 2,217 1,180,000 532 99
23 HILLVIEW REGENCY 1,119 1,050,000 938 99
23 GUILIN VIEW 1,259 1,068,000 848 99
25 WOODHAVEN 592 730,000 1,233 99
25 WOODHAVEN 700 790,000 1,129 99
26 MEADOWS @ PEIRCE 1,184 1,380,000 1,166 FH
27 ORCHID PARK CONDOMINIUM 1,668 1,120,000 671 99