simulation of proton transfer in biological systems

1
Simulation of Proton Transfer in Biological Systems Hong Zhang, Sean Smith Hong Zhang, Sean Smith Centre for Computational Molecular Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia 1 Introduction •Proton transfer plays a vital role in biological systems Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP): monitoring of protein-folding, gene expression, protein movement and cell development. EVB state 1 2 Methodology •QD: transferring protons. 3 Preliminary Results The The characteristic first passage time characteristic first passage time for for proton/deuteron transfer are computed and proton/deuteron transfer are computed and corresponding corresponding isotope effect isotope effect is compared with the is compared with the measured one (in qualitatively agreement). measured one (in qualitatively agreement). The calculated vibrational period for The calculated vibrational period for oscillation of the proton on the excited state is oscillation of the proton on the excited state is 73.5 fs 73.5 fs at the excitation wavelength of 400 nm, at the excitation wavelength of 400 nm, which is in agreement with the experimental which is in agreement with the experimental result from EGFP. result from EGFP. The origin of the The origin of the early-time (prompt) early-time (prompt) stimulated emission stimulated emission is tentatively explained in is tentatively explained in terms of off-resonance excitation at 400 nm and terms of off-resonance excitation at 400 nm and contribution from the fastest component for contribution from the fastest component for proton transfer in GFP. proton transfer in GFP. Currently we are exploring to use more Currently we are exploring to use more sophisticated methods including mixed quantum sophisticated methods including mixed quantum dynamics/molecular dynamics method for GFP dynamics/molecular dynamics method for GFP simulation. simulation. GROMOS: extend our QD codes into the context of GROMOS: extend our QD codes into the context of Gromos package. Gromos package. Introduce new coupling scheme between QD and MD Introduce new coupling scheme between QD and MD part. part. CPMD/GROMOS + QD: A QM/MM QD/MD package. CPMD/GROMOS + QD: A QM/MM QD/MD package. Fig. 2. Evolving excited state wavepackets for proton motions at four distinctive stages for off– resonance excitation case at 400 nm. (a) -30 fs to -25 fs. Photo-absorption processes are shown. (b) 10 fs to 15 fs. Some wave packets excited to the upper surface dump back onto the ground state. (c) 34 fs to 37 fs. Fastest component of proton transfer has appeared. (d) 72 fs to 74 fs. Most of the packets has moved back into A* well. Recent results from model real time quantum Recent results from model real time quantum calculations of proton transfer in GFP calculations of proton transfer in GFP regarding 4 electronic states (labeled A, A*, regarding 4 electronic states (labeled A, A*, I, I*) are presented. I, I*) are presented. Important processes ( Important processes ( photo-absorption photo-absorption and and proton-transfer proton-transfer in the excited state); in the excited state); The vibrational period on the excited The vibrational period on the excited state; state; The The isotope effect isotope effect of proton transfer; of proton transfer; The origin of the The origin of the early-time stimulated early-time stimulated emission emission is tentatively explained is tentatively explained. EVB state 2 •The proposed mechanism for the photoisomerization of wild-type GFP is from the neutral form of the chromophore (A) which converts to the anionic form (B) by going through the intermediate state (I). •By using mixed quantum/classical calculations, hopefully we can predict the whole process of the proton transfer. •Challenges: both electronic and nuclear quantum effects, motion of protein environment. Hong Zhang, Dr. Research Fellow and Q&M Dynamics Group Leader Centre for Computational Molecular Science Chemistry Building 68, The University of Queensland Qld 4072, Brisbane. tel: (617) 3346 9073 email: [email protected] web: http:// www.ccms.uq.edu.au / D A H D A H 2 2 12 12 1 1 nuc nuc nuc EVB R V V V R V R V t R r t R r V r T t t R r i EVB H , , ˆ , Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Chem Phys, 6, 884-894, 2004 (invited review). Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Comm, 6, 12-20, 2003 (invited review). Zhang & Smith, Chem Phys, 308, 297-304, 2005. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys, 2005 (accepted). Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 120: 1161-1163, 2004. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 120: 9583-9593, 2004. Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Chem Phys 6: 4240-4246 2004. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 118: 10042-10050, 2003. Zhang & Smith, J Theor Comput Chem, 2, 563-571, 2003. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 117: 5174-5182, 2002. Zhang & Smith, J Phys Chem A 106: 6129-6136, 2002. Zhang & Smith, J Phys Chem A 106: 6137-6142, 2002. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 116: 2354-2360, 2002. Zhang & Smith, Chem Phys Lett 347: 211-219, 2001. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 115: 5751-5758, 2001. Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Chem Phys 3: 2282-2288, 2001. -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 V g (10 3 cm -1 ) r(au) (a) A I 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 1 2 3 4 5 V e (10 3 cm -1 ) r(au) (b) A* I* -3 0 -29 -28 -2 7 -26 -2 5 0 .00 0 0 0 .0 0 01 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0 .00 0 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 (a ) P s i ( e ) r( au) t(fs) 11.0 11 .5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13 .5 14 .0 14.5 15.0 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0 1 2 3 4 5 (b ) P s i (e ) r ( a u ) t(fs) 34 35 36 37 0.000 0.001 0.002 0 1 2 3 4 5 (c) P s i ( e ) r (a u ) t(fs) 72 73 74 0.000 0.001 0.002 0 1 2 3 4 5 (d ) P s i ( e ) r( au) t(fs) Fig. 1. Model potential energy surfaces of ground state (a) and excited state (b) in GFP. Open circles are from the suggested illustrative PESs given by Vöhringer et al., while solid lines are the interpolated full PESs used in the Fig. 3. (a) Time evolution of excited-state population for off-resonance excitation at 400 nm. Solid line represents proton transfer case while dashed line represents deuteron transfer case. (b) Same as in (a), but for on-resonance excitation case at 434 nm. 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0 100 200 300 400 Population(e) t(fs) 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0 100 200 300 400 Population(e) t(fs) 4 Conclusions and Future Work 5 Some Related Publications Lanczos representation method; Real Chebyshev method; FFT/split operator method. 2)QM/MM method. DFT in CPMD: chromophore; GROMOS force field: all other atoms. •MD: all other atoms. GROMOS; Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics. •PES: 1)empirical valence bond.

Upload: galvin-randolph

Post on 03-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

D. A. H. D. A. H. Simulation of Proton Transfer in Biological Systems. Hong Zhang, Sean Smith. Centre for Computational Molecular Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia. 1 Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulation of Proton Transfer in Biological Systems

Simulation of Proton Transfer in Biological SystemsHong Zhang, Sean SmithHong Zhang, Sean Smith

Centre for Computational Molecular Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia

1 Introduction

•Proton transfer plays a vital role in biological systems — Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP): monitoring of protein-folding, gene expression, protein movement and cell development.

EVB state 1

2 Methodology

•QD: transferring protons.

3 Preliminary Results

         

The The characteristic first passage timecharacteristic first passage time for proton/deuteron transfer are for proton/deuteron transfer are computed and corresponding computed and corresponding isotope effectisotope effect is compared with the is compared with the measured one (in qualitatively agreement). measured one (in qualitatively agreement). The calculated vibrational period for oscillation of the proton on the The calculated vibrational period for oscillation of the proton on the excited state is excited state is 73.5 fs73.5 fs at the excitation wavelength of 400 nm, which is at the excitation wavelength of 400 nm, which is in agreement with the experimental result from EGFP. in agreement with the experimental result from EGFP. The origin of the The origin of the early-time (prompt) stimulated emissionearly-time (prompt) stimulated emission is tentatively is tentatively explained in terms of off-resonance excitation at 400 nm and contribution explained in terms of off-resonance excitation at 400 nm and contribution from the fastest component for proton transfer in GFP. from the fastest component for proton transfer in GFP.

Currently we are exploring to use more sophisticated methods including Currently we are exploring to use more sophisticated methods including mixed quantum dynamics/molecular dynamics method for GFP mixed quantum dynamics/molecular dynamics method for GFP simulation. simulation. GROMOS: extend our QD codes into the context of Gromos package. GROMOS: extend our QD codes into the context of Gromos package. Introduce new coupling scheme between QD and MD part. Introduce new coupling scheme between QD and MD part. CPMD/GROMOS + QD: A QM/MM QD/MD package. CPMD/GROMOS + QD: A QM/MM QD/MD package.

Fig. 2. Evolving excited state wavepackets for proton motions at four distinctive stages for off–resonance excitation case at 400 nm. (a) -30 fs to -25 fs. Photo-absorption processes are shown. (b) 10 fs to 15 fs. Some wave packets excited to the upper surface dump back onto the ground state. (c) 34 fs to 37 fs. Fastest component of proton transfer has appeared. (d) 72 fs to 74 fs. Most of the packets has moved back into A* well.

Recent results from model real time quantum calculations of proton Recent results from model real time quantum calculations of proton transfer in GFP regarding 4 electronic states (labeled A, A*, I, I*) transfer in GFP regarding 4 electronic states (labeled A, A*, I, I*) are presented. are presented. Important processes ( Important processes (photo-absorptionphoto-absorption and and proton-transferproton-transfer in the in the excited state); excited state); The vibrational period on the excited state; The vibrational period on the excited state; The The isotope effectisotope effect of proton transfer; of proton transfer; The origin of the The origin of the early-time stimulated emissionearly-time stimulated emission is tentatively is tentatively explainedexplained.

EVB state 2

•The proposed mechanism for the photoisomerization of wild-type GFP is from the neutral form of the chromophore (A) which converts to the anionic form (B) by going through the intermediate state (I). •By using mixed quantum/classical calculations, hopefully we can predict the whole process of the proton transfer.•Challenges: both electronic and nuclear quantum effects, motion of protein environment.

Hong Zhang, Dr. Research Fellow and Q&M Dynamics Group Leader Centre for Computational Molecular Science Chemistry Building 68, The University of Queensland Qld 4072, Brisbane. tel: (617) 3346 9073 email: [email protected] web: http://www.ccms.uq.edu.au/

D AH

D AH

2212

1211

nuc

nucnucEVB RVV

VRVRV

tRrtRrVrTt

tRri EVBH

,,ˆ,

Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Chem Phys, 6, 884-894, 2004 (invited review). Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Comm, 6, 12-20, 2003 (invited review). Zhang & Smith, Chem Phys, 308, 297-304, 2005. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys, 2005 (accepted). Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 120: 1161-1163, 2004. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 120: 9583-9593, 2004. Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Chem Phys 6: 4240-4246 2004. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 118: 10042-10050, 2003. Zhang & Smith, J Theor Comput Chem, 2, 563-571, 2003.Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 117: 5174-5182, 2002. Zhang & Smith, J Phys Chem A 106: 6129-6136, 2002. Zhang & Smith, J Phys Chem A 106: 6137-6142, 2002. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 116: 2354-2360, 2002. Zhang & Smith, Chem Phys Lett 347: 211-219, 2001. Zhang & Smith, J Chem Phys 115: 5751-5758, 2001. Zhang & Smith, Phys Chem Chem Phys 3: 2282-2288, 2001.

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 1 2 3 4 5

Vg(1

03 cm

-1)

r(au)

(a)

A I

20

22

24

26

28

30

0 1 2 3 4 5

Ve(1

03 cm

-1)

r(au)

(b)

A*

I*

-30-29

-28-27

-26-25

0.0000

0.0001

0.0002

0.0003

0.0004

0.0005

0

12345

(a)

Psi

(e)

r(au

)

t(fs)

11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0

12345

(b)

Psi

(e)

r(a

u)

t(fs)

3435

3637

0.000

0.001

0.002

0

12345

(c)

Psi

(e)

r(au

)

t(fs)

72

73

74

0.000

0.001

0.002

01

23

45

(d)

Psi

(e)

r(au)

t(fs)

Fig. 1. Model potential energy surfaces of ground state (a) and excited state (b) in GFP. Open circles are from the suggested illustrative PESs given by Vöhringer et al., while solid lines are the interpolated full PESs used in the simulation.

Fig. 3. (a) Time evolution of excited-state population for off-resonance excitation at 400 nm. Solid line represents proton transfer case while dashed line represents deuteron transfer case. (b) Same as in (a), but for on-resonance excitation case at 434 nm.

0

0.0005

0.001

0.0015

0 100 200 300 400

Po

pu

latio

n(e

)

t(fs)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0 100 200 300 400

Po

pu

latio

n(e

)

t(fs)

4 Conclusions and Future Work

5 Some Related Publications

Lanczos representation method; Real Chebyshev method; FFT/split operator method.

2)QM/MM method. DFT in CPMD: chromophore; GROMOS force field: all other atoms.

•MD: all other atoms.

GROMOS; Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics.

•PES: 1)empirical valence bond.